The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-18-87 - FOODMAKER - JACK IN THE BOXJACK -IN- THE -BOX (FOODMAKER) BUILDING FOR DRIVE -IN FAST -FOOD RESTAURANT WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY & STRANDER BLVD. EPIC -18 -87 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, JOANNE JOHNSON O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [[ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [i Planning Commission Agenda Packet ( J Short Subdivision Agenda Packet hereby declare that: Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action 0 Official Notice 0 Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit Li Shoreline Management Permit Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAIL STOP PV -11. OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BETTY Name of Project File Number (=�1� - / 7 OCTOBER 19, 1987 , 19 . WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal CONSTRUCT_ ONE -STORY BUILDING FOR USE.AS,A DRIVE -IN FAST -FOOD RESTAURANT (JACK -IN- THE -BOX) Proponent FOODMAKER, INC. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any VALLEY HIGHWAY AND STRANDER BLVD. S.E. CORNER OF WEST Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-18 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XJ There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tuk,i , ' - 981.8 Date ( , /3 /7 / g) Signature Phone 433 -1845 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC -18 -87 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: FILE TO: n BLDG Jj PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT JACK -IN- THE -BOX RESTAURANT LOCATION S.E. CORNER OF W. VALLEY HWY AND STRANDER BLVD DATE TRANSMITTED 9 -18 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR JACK PACE FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9 -24 -87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 10 12 COMMENTS PREPARED BY Rebecca_ l x C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: )(x\ up EPIC -18 -87 FILE TO: n BLDG ri PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE P& R PROJECT - JACK -IN- THE -BOX RESTAURANT LOCATION S.E. CORNER OF W. VALLEY HWY AND STRANDER BLVD DATE TRANSMITTED 9 -18 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR JACK PACE FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9 -24 -87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE r COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: EPIC -18 -87 FILE TO: jAil BLDG F1 PLNG El P.W. FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT JACK -IN- THE -BOX RESTAURANT LOCATION S.E. CORNER OF W. VALLEY HWY AND STRANDER BLVD DATE TRANSMITTED 9 -18 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR JACK PACE FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9 -24 -87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT n0 144 (12.,Ah.w.eit, 1, ttL, of 0 193,...cAL .,;■1 1 :Z4,1. , DATE q -0711-77 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ✓ D (2 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC -18 -87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: n BLDG n PLNG [ P.W. FIRE El POLICE n P & R PROJECT JACK -IN- THE -BOX RESTAURANT LOCATION S.E. CORNER OF W. VALLEY HWY AND STRANDER BLVD DATE TRANSMITTED 9 -18 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR JACK PACE FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9 -24 -87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 2- ,S .74 Qtirn4 ey i„"ti f4 6re CeP e �,- ,42r? DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 FREIHEIT & HO ARCHITECTS, INC., P.S. 10940 N.E. 33rd Place #202 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 8274100 TO C, t 4-9 CDC fiC� �w 1es? 1k; J -. Fibs r rd r 1SEP 151987 CITY OF i i.sl;`dviL/ PLANNING GGPT. 6/200 -,c,i hce,,,lA --er k c lV1C U ., 1 to 9 t 5cb WE ARE SENDING YA ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ] iirin kenoUnaL DATE DATE JOB NO . 1 e6 ATTEN 11111 a ON r (c-c. ' k/a^ ` RE: C (G fri .-tke &3)( '1-lc--it)in5a1,.t. / --f-c)A-t) i Ic3i. 04--; 1 i -I.-Li 'P-erim 1 -}- ,4 pp I err -I-ioo 1 the following items: ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 04--; 1 i -I.-Li 'P-erim 1 -}- ,4 pp I err -I-ioo 1 frk-Nie ropittwel 4E31 C - fd &-- )pple , • it r. (Aec k -C£r - et -I./i re-1 h tMai 61 tR=N i w - n e ig1 is THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections XFor review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints REMARKS 'COPY TO PRODUCT 2404 /Ares / Inc-, cemn, saa man. SIGNED: Dglti6e If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. RECEIVED CITY OF ruKwiLA SEP 4 1987 Control No. Epic File No. e —(8— %) 7 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. q 3O BUILDING 0 91RONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT. TUKWTJ,A, WA_ 2. Name of applicant: FOODMAKER, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: DAVID HILLS — FREIHEIT & HO ARCHITECTS, INC., P.S. 10940 NE 33RD PL, BELLEVUE, WA 827 -2100 4. Date checklist prepared: 8/24/87 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN DURING NOVEMBER 1987, AND WILL BE COMPLETED IN APPROXIMATELY 90 DAYS AFTER COMMENCING. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NONE KNOWN 8.. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE KNOWN 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE KNOWN 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. ' BUILDING PERMITS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no-. need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized 'Here. CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE WILL BE A SINGLE STORY BUILDING OF APPROXIMATELY 2110 SF. THE SITE IS 0.765 ACRERS. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE USED AS A RESTAURANT. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not . required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. THE SITE HAS NOT BEEN ASSIGNED AN ADDRESS AT THIS TIME. LOCATION IS S.E. CORNER OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AND STRANDER BOULEVARD. (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NONE KNOWN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B.' ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? LESS THAN 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. SAND WITH SOFTSILTS AND SCATTERED ORGANIC MATERIALS. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NONE KNOWN e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. FILL WILL BE USED IN ORDER TO SET BUILDING AT REQUIRED ELEVATION. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 80 -90 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: DRAINAGE CONTROT, DESIGN WILL STABLIZE THE SITE_ 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. EMISSIONS WILL BE GENERATED BY TYPICAL LIGHT — FRAME WOOD CONSTRUCTION AND FROM A RESTAURANT WITH 42 PARKING SPACES. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: REQUIREMENTS OF BUILDING AND MECHANICAL CODES WILL BE MET. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NONE KNOWN . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NONE KNOWN 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NOT KNOWN 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.NO Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the - general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. RUN OFF FROM THE BUILDING ROOF AND PARKING LOT AREAS WILL BE DIRECTED INTO STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: APPRI TELY DESIGNED DRAINAGE CONTROL WILL ENSURE CONTROL OF WATER RUN OFF. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other T shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ALL VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SIGNIFICANT TREES WHICH INTEGRATE WITH THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: PROVIDE GENEROUS AMOUNT OF NATIVE PLANTINGS. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE -KNOWN c. Is the site part of i migration route? If so, explain. NONE KNOWN d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. GAS WILL BE USED FOR COOKING EQUIPMENT AND HVAC. ELECTRICITY WILL BE USED FOR LIGHTING. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: REQUIREMENTS OF WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE WILL BE MET. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE KNOWN 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NO 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE KNOWN 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NOISE WILL BE GENERATED IN THE AMOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH A RESTAURANT WHICH HAS OCCUPANCY FOR 68. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? VACANT b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT KNOWN c. Describe any structures on the site. NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A 9. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NOT KNOWN h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NOT KNOWN i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? APPROXIMATELY 5 -10 PEOPLIWILL WORK IN BUILDING J. • Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NW. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NfNR 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: MEET CURRENT BUILDING AND ZONING CODES. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N.A. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N.A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? HIGH POINT OF BUILDING ROOF IS 17' -6 ". ROOFING MATERIAL WILL BE CONCRETE TILE. WALLS WILL BE STUCCO. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: PROVIDE ARCHITECTURALLY DESTGNED BUILDING AND LANDSCAPING. Evaluation for Agency Use Only '11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? LIGHT WILL BE PRODUCED BY LOT LIGHTING AND BUILDING ILLUMINATION UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 11:00 PM. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NONE KNOWN c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE KNOWN d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: APPRO)Q1{ATELY DESIGNED LOT LIGHTING WILL CONTROL LIGHT -RD GLARE IMPACTS. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE KNOWN b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SITE IS SERVED BY WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AND STRANDER BOULEVARD. 'b.' Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NOT KNOWN c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? PROVIDE 42 SPACES. NONE ELIMINATED. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. THAT GENERATED BY A RESTAURANT WITH 42 PARKING SPACES. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: MEET CITY OF TUKWILA TRAFFIC ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. PROJECT WILL BE SERVED BY EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICES. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a. Cir le utilities ly av• able �lectrici t fuse service is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. WATER: CITY OF TUKWILA; SEWER: CITY OF TUKWILA ELECTRICITY: PUGET POWER; GAS: WA. NATURAL GAS." TELEPHONE: PACIFIC NW BELL. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: "tX/ticAq. q-4.7 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only y- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tiveinformation, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Mr vie 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: )44./\; Evaluation for [Pl587 CITY OF!JKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Nfpry 1 1a_lh . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: (q, �. -23-