Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA EPIC-18-90 - CARLSON FERRIN ARCHITECTS - LARRY'S MARKET
LARRY'S MARKET S. 144TH AND PACIFIC HIGHWAY (TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD.) EPIC -18 -90 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS y fill/ ,rg ki MARGOT HEYNE ` ^� 2700 First Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 Organizer Mobile Phone: 949 -31 Local Union No. 46 Phone: 441 -4600 5 5 N /FERRIN A R C H I T EC TS Terre Meinershagen 206/ 441 -3066 1928 Pike Place Market Seattle, WA 98101 3rd Floor Champion Bldg. WAC 197 -11 -970 • FINAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal To construct a 56,000 square foot supermarket, including a cafe and 313 stall parkinglot. Proponent Carlson /Ferrin Architects Location of Proposal, including street address, if any s. 144th and Pacific Hwy. S.; Section 22, Twn, 23, Rge. 4; Tukwila. WA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC--1q- °gyp The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. El Q There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by proposal for 15 days from the date belowe lead agency will not act on this Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address „ 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, T kW ' A '8188 Date �`, Zp Signature Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter 3oulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. '.opies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and ?lanning Department. 'M.ONS 1t CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PROJECT: DATE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PHONE ti (206) 433 -1800 CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor EPIC- 18 -90: Larry's Market No. 1 September 27, 1990 To construct a 56,000 square foot supermarket, including a cafe and 313 -stall parking lot. S. 144th and Pacific Highway South; Section 22, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 Carlson /Ferrin Architects THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review of this proposal consisted of an analysis based on the following documents included in the environmental record: o Documents from King County (pre- annexation): - Letter from King Co. to Supermarket Development Corp. (5/3/90) , - King County Zone Reclassification Application (9/14/89) - Environmental Checklist prepared by Supermarket Development Corp. for King County (9/7/89) • o Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Terra Associates for Larry McKinney (4/29/90) o Memo regarding traffic impacts from Tukwila Public Works to Department of Community Development (9/7/90) letter regarding traffic study from WSDOT to City of Tukwila (6/13/90) o Environmental Checklist prepared by Larry's Markets, Inc. for City of Tukwila (7/9/90) o Traffic Impact Analysis by the Transpo Group (7/9/90) o Letter regarding Smokehouse from Larry's Markets, Inc. to City of Tukwila (8/8/90) o Technical Information Report (Soils, Hydrology) by DOWL Engineers (8/10/90) PROJECT: DATE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FILE REFERENCE: CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Larry's Market No. 1 September 27, 1990 To construct a 56,000 square foot supermarket, including a cafe and 313 -stall parking lot. S. 144th and Pacific Highway South; Section 22, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 Carlson /Ferrin Architects EPIC -18 -90 THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review of this proposal consisted of an analysis based on the following documents included in the environmental record: o Documents from King County (pre- annexation): - Letter from King Co. to Supermarket Development Corp. (5/3/90) - King County Zone Reclassification Application (9/14/89) - Environmental Checklist prepared by Supermarket Development Corp. for King County (9/7/89) o Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Terra Associates for Larry McKinney (4/29/90) o Memo regarding traffic impacts from Tukwila Public Works to Department of Community Development (9/7/90) letter regarding traffic study from WSDOT to City of Tukwila (6/13/90) o Environmental Checklist prepared by Larry's Markets, Inc. for City of Tukwila (7/9/90) o Traffic Impact Analysis by the Transpo Group (7/9/90) o Letter regarding Smokehouse from Larry's Markets, Inc. to City of Tukwila (8/8/90) o Technical Information Report (Soils, Hydrology) by DOWL Engineers (8/10/90) MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 2 BACKGROUND This area was recently annexed to the City of Tukwila (9/1/90). As part of the annexation process, the City Council adopted pre- annexation zoning for this area. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The proposal includes construction of a new supermarket facility, consisting of enclosed supermarket, outdoor cafe, enclosed receiving dock and screened compactor /container. Also included is the construction of a 313 - stall, landscaped parking lot; a storm water runoff control system; installation of perimeter landscaping and sidewalks. To accomplish the proposal, clearing and grading of the site for the building pad and parking lot would be required. No fill would be required. DESIGN FEATURES The materials used for supermarket would include a combination of split face, grey concrete block; corrugated, anodized aluminum siding and roofing; and green- and white - painted aluminum for accent and window trim. The site landscaping would include shade trees in the parking lot; shade trees and lawn along the streets; and barrier shrubs and screening conifers at the rear. PERMITS REQUIRED o Board of Architectural Review approval o Grading permit o Building permit o Utility /street use permits • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 3 CHECKLIST ITEMS A. EARTH The site is mostly flat, with some areas sloped approximately 7 %. Soils consist mainly of gravelly sands, dense silty sands, and localized fill soils. Excavations of up to about 13 feet would be needed to accommodate the development. No fill would be required. The silty sands on the site create a potential for erosion during construction. Installation of permanent subsurface drainage systems along cuts and implementation of standard erosion control measures would mitigate erosion and sedimentation potentials. An underground fuel tank has been removed from the site. Soils from the tank excavation indicated no contamination. B. WATER Approximately 78% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. Storm water runoff from parking areas will contain oil, heavy metals, and other pollutants. Implementation of storm water runoff control system, oil separators and the proposed biofiltration swale would mitigate effects of pollutants downstream. C. AIR Short term impacts to air quality include dust generation and emissions from equipment during construction. Implementation of dust control measures during construction, such as watering exposed soil surfaces and equipment traffic areas, would mitigate short term air quality impacts. Most emissions from on -site food preparation are to be contained within the equipment itself. Consequently, . no significant long term impacts to air quality are expected. MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 4 D. PLANTS Currently, tall grass and herbaceous plants cover most of the site, while the upper, west portion contains patches of blackberries. A few mature ornamental conifers and shrubs occur in the southern half of the site. The proposed landscape design adds new trees, shrubs and groundcover, which would help mitigate loss of existing vegetation cover. E. VISUAL QUALITY The revised development plans submitted (9/7/90) for review by the Board of Architectural Review include features which would affect the visual quality of the site and the surrounding area. Issues such as building design, site and landscape design, glare generated from the project will be addressed as part of the design review process. F. NOISE Operation of construction equipment would result in a short term increase in noise levels near adjacent apartment buildings and surrounding commercial businesses. Limiting construction activities to week days as provided under TMC 8.22.160 would partially reduce short term noise impacts. Some long term noise impacts would be generated by the normal operations of the facility, including deliveries, trash disposal /collection, mechanical equipment operation, and increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The proposed loading dock is recessed approximately eight feet (4' below grade, with 4' wall) which would help mitigate some of this noise. • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 5 G. TRAFFIC It is estimated that the new supermarket would generate approximately 1,040 driveway trips, with the greatest volume occurring during the weekday p.m. peak hour. To serve the proposed facility, a new access drive would be created on both Pacific Highway South (SR 99) and S. 144th. Currently, the intersection of SR 99 and 144th is signalized. The SR 99/144th intersection experiences a relatively high accident rate (approximately 12 accidents /year), with half of these accidents attributable to unprotected left turns off of SR 99. Implementation of the proposal is expected to reduce the current level of service at this intersection from LOS C to LOS F. The intersection of SR 99/146th is currently controlled by a stop sign. Increases in traffic generated by the supermarket facility and other sources are expected to decrease the operation of the SR 99/146th intersection from LOS D to LOS E. Pedestrians currently use the site for a diagonal short- cut to residential areas to the west. These pedestrian trips would most likely increase as a result of the proposal, and would shift to the perimeter of the site. Proposed sidewalks provided along streets bordering the site would help mitigate the increase in, and displacement of pedestrian traffic. (See Conditions #1, #3, #5.) Installation of left turn lanes, limiting driveway access, and the addition of traffic signals would help mitigate traffic and safety impacts generated by the proposal. (See Conditions #6, #7.) H. UTILITIES The proposed facility will result in an increase in impervious surfaces and potential runoff. (See Condition #8.) • MDNS: Larry's Market September 27, 1990 Page 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate since the environmental review indicates no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. MITIGATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Along South 144th Street and South 146th Street, the project shall: a) Dedicate a 10' right -of -way; b) Provide development frontal street improvements to South 144th and South 146th Street including the following: construct curb, gutter and'6' sidewalk with street widening, drainage and utilities relocations as needed. 2. The owner shall sign an agreement for the Project's proportionate share of future undergrounding for South 144th Street and for 146th Street along the Project's frontage. 3. Along Pacific Highway South, the Project shall: a) Dedicate 4' easement or right -of -way for a sidewalk; b) Provide frontal improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalk, and drainage relocations in accordance with Pacific Highway South section: 84' curb to curb (inside), 5' planting strip /landscaping and 6' sidewalk. 4. The owner shall sign an agreement for the Project's proportionate share of future undergrounding Pacific Highway South frontage and signalization on South 146th Street intersection. 5. An off -site pedestrian walkway fronting the existing Exxon site along SR 99 and South 144th Street shall be provided. This condition assumes that Exxon will grant permission for a portion of its property to be used for a pedestrian walkway. Owner shall initiate and coordinate arrangements for such an agreement. 6. Additional traffic analyses shall be conducted for the S. 146th Street and SR 99 intersection prior to isusance of Certificate of Occupancy. • • MDNS: Larry's Market September 27, 1990 Page 7 A signal warrant analysis and collision diagram shall be used to determine future intersection improvements. The fair share cost of the analysis and of signalization is to be based on the amount of increased intersection traffic by Larry's Market divided by the increase from 1990 to 1995. 7. Prior to issuance of the building permit, channelization shall be evaluated for SR 99 at the Project driveway, and S. 144th at the Project driveway and Kentucky Fried Chicken driveway for left turn storage. 8. A evaluation of downstream drainage capacity for one - fourth mile downstream of the Project to determine deficienies shall be provided. The owner shall sign an agreement for the Project's proportionate share of storm drainage improvements on Pacific Highway South. larrmdns PAGES 6 & 7 (CONDITIONS) HAVE BEEN REPLACED BY 2 SEPARATE PAGES IN PUBLIC WORKS' COMPUTER -- ALL CONDITIONS NOW TRAFFIC ONLY MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 6 CONCLUSIONS Issuance of appropriate probability proposal. AND RECOMMENDATIONS a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is since the environmental review indicates no of significant adverse environmental impacts from the MITIGATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANTS 1. To protect significant trees adjacent to the site, plans submitted for a Grading Permit shall denote drip lines of significant trees in relation to construction limit lines. For significant trees affected by construction, the plans shall specify detailed measures for root and limb protection during construction. TRAFFIC 2.. Fronting the Project, a 10' right -of -way on South 144th Street and a minimum.3.5'right -of -way and /or easement for Pacific Highway South (SR 99) shall be dedicated, providing a 6' sidewalk, 5' planter strip and 42.5' of roadway on the west side of the SR 99 centerline. 3. The owner shall sign a No Protest Agreement LID for: A. Commercial street improvements on SR 99 for 84' curb to curb roadway /7 lane configuration, including curb /gutter, sidewalk planting strip, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation /undergrounding, street lighting, and signalization modifications. The Project shall be given credit for right -of way donations and frontal improvements which directly meet improvements or right -of -way requirements for SR 99. MDNS: Larry's Market 9/27/90 Page 7 3., cont. B. Undergrounding of utilities on S. 144th and S. 146th. 4. The Project shall provide frontal improvements on S. 144th, S. 146th and SR 99. Improvements are to include 6' sidewalks only, street widening, curb /gutter, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation, street lighting, and signalization modifications. 5. The Project shall provide off -site pedestrian walkway fronting existing Exxon site along SR 99, or 150% cash assignment for these improvements prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Additional traffic analyses shall be conducted for S. 146th and SR 99 intersection prior to issuance of a Building Permit. A. A signal warrant analysis and collision diagram shall be used to determine future intersection improvements. The cost of this analysis is to be shared by the Project and the proposed new motel on 146th (Dondero), based on the contribution of each to intersection traffic. B. The cost of the Project's contribution to future intersection improvements to be determined by the Project's traffic divided by 1990 to 2000 traffic increase. 7. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, channelization shall be evaluated for SR 99 at Project driveway, and for S. 144th at Project's driveway and Kentucky Fried Chicken driveway for left turn storage. UTILITIES 8. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, an evaluation of downstream drainage capacity for runoff from the project site shall be provided. 11 ( DAT TIMF, t / UUU N hib i AREA CODE-) .1.:- 4 • -- O i a Op OF E S G E Iffiiziffil � ltdag 11L� IMENI MY/.®`' 1 "® ' SIGN PHONED RETURNED ETTD ❑ GALL Will ❑ WAS ❑ URGENT 1=0:: Washington State WAF Department of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007 -6538 (206) 562 -4000 Mr. Vernon M. Umetsu City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Umetsu: Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation ✓� �,��s :, X'. e-ria� September 18, 1990 SR 99 MP 21.10 CS 173200 Traffic study comments for Larry's Market #1 relocation King Co. File No. 220 -89 -R This letter is in response to traffic study that we received from The Transpo Group on August 17, 1990. The project proposes to move the existing Larry's Market from the northwest corner to the southwest corner of the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection. The relocated Larry's Market will increase the size from the existing 31,900 gsf to 54,332 gsf. The anticipated date of completion and full occupancy is 1992. The development is projected to produce a total of 11,312 daily trips with 315 AM peak hour trips and 1043 PM peak hour trips. In a June 11, 1990 phone conversation with Mr. Hal Eden of Carlson /Ferrin Architects, it is the Department of Transportation's understanding that the developer is delaying this project until this area of King County is officially annexed into the City of Tukwila. This action is expected to take place in September of 1990. Therefore, the following comments on the traffic study assume that the development is in the City of Tukwila. (1) The AM peak period was not included in the LOS analysis. Since certain movement volumes may be more critical during this peak, both peak periods should be included in the analysis. (2) Pass by trips are estimated to make up 16% of the driveway trips. The Trip Generation Manual does not list a pass by trip percentage for supermarkets in Table V -5. The pass by percentage for shopping centers is not applicable for supermarkets. Additional published justification needs to be submitted for our review before we will acce ass ftiE - I_ for C I f ,� 1 �') I °J ytr Z 0 19 0 SEP 201990 CITY OF TUKWILA DI Am11111Nn nGDr September 18, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Page 2 (3) Diverted trips are estimated to make up 59% of the driveway trips. The study states that the trips diverted from other grocery stores would not be new to the street system if a large enough study area is selected. We do not accept this rational. The diverted trips will be new to the streets impacted by this development according to the definition in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. For example, vehicles which enter the current Larry's Market site from the south will now be required to make a left turn at the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection• thus creating a new impact. Also, no trip reduction can be claimed for the existing Larry's Market trips because they were never mitigated initially. Plus, the Trip Generation Manual does not identify a procedure for estimating the'percentage of diverted trips for any land use. These trips should be included in the new trip volumes at all impacted intersections. (4) Due to the factors listed above, the trip distribution and LOS's should be recalculated at all the previously analyzed intersections. (5) The SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection was identified as having a relatively high accident rate, however, not so high as to require any mitigation. We disagree. This location is within a 1990 Hazardous Accident Location as identified by WSDOT which ranks 11th out of the 215 identified locations. Four pedestrian accidents occurred at this intersection during a recent three year analysis period. The subject development will increase pedestrian travel through the intersection. We recommend improvements to pedestrian facilities at the intersection be part of the off site mitigation for this project. This could include concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk on all corners. (6 The SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection is part of an interconnected signal system along SR 99. The software used to calculate LOS's (NCAP) cannot analyze interconnected signals. The Department is currently in the process of optimizing the signal timings along this corridor. Plus, the timings should be optimized for all signal' analyses to begin with even if it is not the timing currently being operated. Because of this, we do not believe timing changes are adequate mitigation at the intersection. We concur with the recommendation contained within the traffic study for the installation of an eastbound double left turn lane on S. 144th St. • • September 18, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umatsu Page 3 (7) In order to help mitigate the traffic impacts generated by the commercial development of the site, we recommend the city impose upon the developer the requirements of the SR 99 route continuity plan. This plan specifies a 7 -lane roadway design with a 13 foot wide two -way left turn lane. This plan has an alternative based on recommendations from a recent Puget Sound Council of Governments study. The outside lanes would be used exclusively for HOV (high occupancy vehicle) purposes. Also, a median barrier down the center of SR 99 is proposed in the future to restrict left turn movements on and off the highway. We do not know when or if these recommendations will be implemented on SR 99. In the meantime, frontage improvements include construction of cement concrete curb, gutter and 5 foot sidewalk along the site's entire SR 99 frontage together with the associated roadway widening and enclosed drainage system. The front face of the curb should be located approximately 42.5 feet from the SR 99 centerline. (8) We concur with the study recommendation to limit the SR 99 site access to right -in /right -out only. (9) Mr. Doug Johnson of METRO (684 -1597) has requested through King County (see enclosed letter) that an existing bus zone adjacent to the new supermarket property be upgraded. This will need to be coordinated with METRO and Mr. Gene Holeman of WSDOT Traffic Operations at 562 -4248. If any of the proposed bus shelter is within WSDOT right of way, an air space lease will be needed. Ms. Pat Sautter should be contacted at 562 -4383 if an air space lease is necessary. (10) For any changes to channelization on SR 99, a full size channelization plan needs to be submitted for review and approval. The channelization plan should be a minimum scale of 1 " =50'; showing both sides of the highway or the entire intersection (whichever is applicable), while including lane widths, tapers, pavement markings, lane markers, existing accesses, and stationing of all breaks in continuity. Terminology stated in the State Standard Specifications should be used when referring to pavement 'markings and lane markers. A copy of the WSDOT District 1 Checklist for Channelization Plans is included to assist in the plan preparation. • • September 18, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umatsu Page 4 Once we have received the above requested information, we will finalize our comments. In the meantime, should you have any technical questions concerning comments 2 -6, please feel free to call Eric Bonn of our Traffic Analysis section at 562 -4236. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562 -4274) or Robert Eichelsdoerfer (562 -4297) of my Developer Services section. Sin ely, / 0 I S L. LUTZ, PA. iplities/Develweer vices Engineer RTE:rte cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Ron Cameron, City of Tukwila Paulette Norman, K.C. Dept. of Public Works Barbara Questad, King County SEPA Center Doug Johnson, METRO Larry McKinney Hal Eden, Carlson /Ferrin Architects Erin Bard, The Transpo Group Encl. WSDOT. DISTRICT 1 CHECKLIST FOR CHANNELIZATION PLANS NOTE TO DESIGNER: ALL ELEMENTS SIIOWN IN THIS CHECKLIST MUST BE INCLUDED IN YOUR CHANNELIZATION PLAN. IF AN ELEMENT IS MISSING, THE PLAN WILL NOT BE REVIEWED BUT WILL BE RETURNED WITHOUT ANY ACTION. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS: 1. Use the latest updates of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the WSDOT Design Manual. Use terminology specified in the WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction and the WSDOT Design . Manual. Use plan scale of 1" = 50'. 2. Show entire roadway width with all elements listed below. Where new channelization matches with existing highway sections, show no less than 300 feet of the existing highway section beyond the match line(s) with all elements listed below. REOUIRED CHANNELIZATION DESIGN ELEMENTS: Township, Range, and North Arrow — Street and Highway Names and /or Designations Property Lines and WSDOT Right -of -Way Lines Curve Data and Control Points: PC, PI, and PT — Stations of Intersecting Roadway and Road Approaches _ Roadway Centerline: Bearing and 100 -ft Stations (Note: See WSDOT Right -of -Way plan for references in stations.) _ Construction Centerline (if applicable): Bearing and 100 -ft Stations Begin/End Stations of Roadway Widening _ Show All Pavement Markings, Arrows, etc.: Begin/End Stations of Tapers and Striping on Highway and Intersecting Roadway Widths of Lanes and Shoulders on State Highways and Intersecting Roadways Corner Radii for Intersecting Roadway and Road Approach Intersection Left Turn Radii: Typical R = 50 ft. Distance from Centerline to Face of Curb: Show Dimensions of Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk (if applicable) chnlzn 120789 , ®mET'RD' -- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 March 16, 1990 Ms. Barbara Questad King County Building and Land Development Division S.E.P.A. Center 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 -1400 'aECEIVED MAR ? 01990 WSDOT DIST 1 UTILITIES Re: Supermarket Development Corporation Project Proposal - South 144th Street & Pacific Highway South Dear Ms. Questad: It is my understanding that the Supermarket Development Corporation is submitting a project proposal for the property located at South 144 Street and Pacific Highway South. Metro Transit maintains a bus zone adjacent to this property on Pacific Highway South about 120 feet south of South 144th Street. I would like to request that certain improvements to this bus stop be incorporated into the Supermarket Development Corporation project. I am specifically interested in the addition of a concrete footing for a Metro passenger waiting shelter. This footing would be about 5 feet x 10 feet and could be located behind the new 5 foot concrete sidewalk that the State Department of Transportation will probably require here. If this concrete footing is constructed, Metro will provide the shelter and assume all responsibility for its repair and maintenance. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at 684 -1597. Thank you. Sincerely, --A - Doug Johnson Transit Planner DJ:jt cc: Robert Eichelsdoerser, Washington State Department of Transportation Stan Love, Supermarket Development Corporation A !I • VI Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting (] Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit ui ut:,i1(�urtoN hereby declare that: ❑ Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [] Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice ❑ Other O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project 4/1/14r 1141/14e File Number MO ^°1 -1712- 0/ �. '7) 11 R -0 19 . BARRERAS, JOSE 0. 13220 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 BOE, ROBERT S. 13514 - 35TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 BROWNFIELD, PAT 11622 - 24TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 CARLISLE, DAVED 13819 - 38TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 DRAGANOV, SHARON 13224 - 32ND AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 FERNAU, DARYL 3215 S. 133RD. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 GJERDRUM, JOHN 3236 S. 135TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 GREENE, RON & LINDA 3116 S. 133RD ST. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 HENDRICKS, JACK B. 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 WESLEY, LORE 13044 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 c.f3,; V c f,c,J O r) n IJ-&r S HENDRICKS, MARK R. 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 HENDRICKS, SUE 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 JUHASZ, PAUL L. 11849 - 25TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 LIVERMORE, DAVID 13212 - 31ST AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 LUNZ, BETTY 13315 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MC GIBBON, RUBY M. 14120 - 34TH PLACE S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MOORE, JAY 12627 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MORTENSON, SCOTT 12634 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MULLET, STEVE 3303 S. 132ND SEATTLE, WA 98168 WELCH, JOHN T. 2700 S. 133RD, SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SALLE, BERNARDO 13003 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCHMAUTZ, JIM & DIANNE 14051 - 35TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCHWALD, DAWN J. 3505 S. 137TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCOTT, ADELE 13020 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SIMPSON, RICHARD 13832 - 37TH S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 STRIKER, GREGORY W. 14406 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SWEDELUIS, LARRY 3131 S. 133RD. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 THISTLE, FLOYD E. 3226 S. 130TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 THOMS, DALE J. 14031 - 33RD. AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. :98168 THORTON, JERRY B. 3219 S. 142ND PLACE SEATTLE, WA. 98168 BARRERAS, JOSE D. 13220 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 BOE, ROBERT S. 13514 - 35TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 BROWNFIELD, PAT 11622 - 24TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 CARLISLE, DAVED 13819 - 38TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 DRAGANOV, SHARON 13224 - 32ND AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 FERNAU, DARYL 3215 S. 133RD. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 GJERDRUM, JOHN 3236 S. 135TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 GREENE, RON & LINDA 3116 S. 133RD ST. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 HENDRICKS, JACK B. 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 WESLEY, LORE 13044 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 c V w �vlr� -y o rI F6fC - (411.&01 to e,r-s HENDRICKS, MARK R. 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 HENDRICKS, SUE 3514 S. 142ND SEATTLE, WA. 98168 JUHASZ, PAUL L. 11849 - 25TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 LIVERMORE, DAVID 13212 - 31ST AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 LUNZ, BETTY 13315 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MC GIBBON, RUBY M. 14120 - 34TH PLACE S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MOORE, JAY 12627 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MORTENSON, SCOTT 12634 MILITARY RD. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 MULLET, STEVE 3303 S. 132ND SEATTLE, WA 98168 WELCH, JOHN T. 2700 S. 133RD, SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SALLE, BERNARDO 13003 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCHMAUTZ, JIM & DIANNE 14051 - 35TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCHWALD, DAWN J. 3505 S. 137TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SCOTT, ADELE 13020 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SIMPSON, RICHARD 13832 - 37TH S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 STRIKER, GREGORY W. 14406 - 34TH AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 SWEDELUIS, LARRY 3131 S. 133RD. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 THISTLE, FLOYD E. 3226 S. 130TH SEATTLE, WA. 98168 THOMS, DALE J. 14031 - 33RD. AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA. 98168 THORTON, JERRY B. 3219 S. 142ND PLACE SEATTLE, WA. 98168 1, 2,Dicuin 11 c • I- 1 U A V l I u : U 1 S I R i a U T I O N Ill( Y7 t2 hereby declare that: O Determination of Nonsignificance ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [] Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice Ithi Notice of Public Hearing [] Notice of Public Meeting (J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [] Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit Q Other ❑ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project LAaArr 4 ? NIM1/ 'k,tk File Number q0' q tuvilb , le-1 , 1970. Ise Resident - Apartment e Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168. Resident - Apartment 8 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 12 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Residenlar Apartment 18 VictorigrArms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 23 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 'Resident - Apartments Villanelle Apartment 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 23 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident Apartment 31 Villanellr Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 33 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 34 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South.146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 35 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Victoria Arms 3440 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartmen 3742 South 146th Str t Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 3742 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 3742 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 9816A i Residenft Apartment 9 Villanerrb Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Villanelle Apartments 3458. South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 12 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Villanelle Apartments 3458 South 146th Street Caattla WA 9A1AA Resident - Apartments Pacific Court Apartm s 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Cep + +lc WA QAiRR i ResidenlIk Apartment 23 Pacific urt Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 31 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 1' 1 r ,Riverton View Apts. •16 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 17 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 18 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 19 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 20 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 21 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 22 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 23 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 24 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident 14420 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Motel Manager 14440 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 1 Residenla Apartment 1 Pacific urt Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident- Apartment 8 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Pacific Court Apartments 4028 S. 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartmedli45 Colonial Garden ApIrtments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 14416 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 14416 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 14416 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 14416 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 14416 Pacific Hwy South Seattle WA 98168 Resident 14412 Pacific Hwy S. Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 1 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 2 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 3 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 4 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverto View Apts. # 5 Reside South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 6 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 7 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 8 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 9 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 10 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 11 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 12 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 13 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 14 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Riverton View Apts. # 15 Resident 3455 South 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 uee • Resident - Apartme23 Colonial Garden Ap ments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 31 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 33 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street c tt10 WA QA1RA Residue - Apartment 34 Coloni Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 35 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 36 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 37 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 38 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 39 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 40 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 41 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 42 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 43 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 44 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street . Saat.t_1a WA QA1RA 1 1 Resident - Apartme 1 Colonial Garden Apa tments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 981.68 Resident - Apartment 2 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th-Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Reside ill- Apartment 12 Coloni Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Colonial Garden Apartments 3465 S. 144th Street n _ _ 16 L 1 _ S_.. # . • Resident - Apartm 23 La Rochelle Apartm is 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 31 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 33 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Comt•+lo WA O01RO Resid - Apartment 34 La Roenlle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 35 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 36 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 37 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 38 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 39 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 40 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apart t 1 La Rochelle Apart ents 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 La. Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street seattle WA 98168 Resiiihnt - Apartment 12 La qUghelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 La Rochelle Apartments 3445 S. 144th Street. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 • Resident - Apartment 109 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 ., • Resident - Apartment 110 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 111 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 112 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 113 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 114 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 115 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 116 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 117 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 118 Samara Apts X4:14 South 144th St. c Resident •Apartment 119 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 120 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 121 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 122 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 123 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 124 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 125 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 126 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 127 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 128 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 129 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. { Resident - Apartment • Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 87 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 88 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 89 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 90 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 91 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 92 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 93 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 94 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 95 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98i68 Resident - Apartment 96 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA q$41AA f Resident Apartment 97 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. _ Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 98 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 99 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 100 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 101 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 { Resident - Apartment 102 Samara Apts t,.. 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 t L. Resident - Apartment 103 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 104 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 105 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 106 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 107 Samara Apts 1414 South 144th St. Resident - Apartment Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 • Resident - Apartment 65 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 66 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 67 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 68 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 69 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 70 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 71 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 72 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 73 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 74 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Resident Apartment 75 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 76 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 77 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 78 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 79 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 80 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 81 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 82 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 83 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 84 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 85 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Resident - Apartmentle Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 43 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 44 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 - - Resident - Apartment 45 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 46 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 47 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 _ - Th Resident - Apartment 48 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 49 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 50 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 51 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 52 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. c ct. ck, Resident Apartment 53 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 54 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 55 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 56 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 57 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 58 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 59 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 60 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 61 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 62 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 63 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th qt. Resident - Apartment Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 J C_ Resident - Apartment 23 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. 0 Resident Apartment 31 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 33 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 34 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 35 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 36 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 37 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 38 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 39 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 40 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 41 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. 1 Resident - Apartment 14626 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Motel Manager South City Motel 14242 Pacific Highway South Seattle WA 98168 Resident 14341 37th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. __Seattle WA_981_68__ Resident - Apartment 2 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. C Resided. Apartment 9 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 12 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Samara Apts 3434 South 144th St. Resident - Apartment. 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 45 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 46 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 47 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 48 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident 3531 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident 3705 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 1 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 2 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 3 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 4 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 1 i Resident Unit 5 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 6 4011 South 146th Street r Seattle WA 98168 r C.. Resident - Unit 7 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 8 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Unit 9 4011 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident 14603 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Seattle Community Center Church 3505 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 1 14626 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 14626 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 14626 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 14626 35th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 r Resident - Apartment. 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 23 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 26 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 27 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 28 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 29 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 30 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 31 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 32 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street r f c L f Residen Apartment 33 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 34 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 35 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 36 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 37 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 38 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 39 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 40 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 41 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 42 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 43 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Resident 3460 South 148th Street Seattle WA 98168 • Resident - Apartment 1 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 2 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 3 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 4 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 5 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th StrPPt f C C Residen- Apartment 11 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 12 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 14 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 15 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street 'Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 01 Cara Apartments 3515 South 146th Street -4; South`7146th°Street attle; ,WA .98168 esiVdent - Apartment 5 - Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 6 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 7 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 8 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 9 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 10 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 11 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 12 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 13 /ictoria Arms 1430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 esident - Apartment 14 ictoria Arms 1.30 South 146th Street ?attle WA 98168 Cr • (1 C r c t C: c Resident partment 15 Victoria Its 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 16 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 17 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 18 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 19 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 20 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 21 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 22 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 23 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 24 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Seattle WA 98168 Resident - Apartment 25 Victoria Arms 3430 South 146th Street Cca11-10 WA QA1A • 1 F i t i - A U A V I I u F U I; I R i u r I O N ptcua n fi Zhereby declare that: An Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting (J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Determination of Nonsignificance ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice Other ❑ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project 44r1r14( r6, ktk File Number 60 - �Z {cilvt.b4) h$ 004000 - 090102 OLYMPIA .PIZZA SPAGHETTI HOUSE LTD 3236'12TH AVE W SEATTLE. WA, 904000- 0910 -01 MACKLAND LIVING TRUST PO B0X:46697 SEATTLE WA • G`7-r., °,7.1insM,•:,r:- -.'p• -•- -.. • )04000-0912-09• DEFEO PATRICK +R__ICHARD P 0 BOX 488 BELFAIR WA ?04400-0005 -09 LEMMON HAROLD 223 SW 142ND -_ SEATTLE WA • 900280 98119 499999 98146 029999 98528 813538 98166 '.04400- 0040-06. NICHIREN SHOSHU SOKA GAKKAI849999 FRED ZEITSU 3505 S` 146TH SEATTLE WA 98168 X52304- 9011-00 MCKINNEY LARRY H 261927 14900 INTERURBAN.AVE S 0240 TUKWILA WA 98168 :52304- 9092-02 MALEFAIT LEON T 14242 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE WA 439999 98168 :52304 - 914004 LIVENGOOD LYNN H E0175 5024 LAKE WASHINGTON.BLVD NE RENTON' VA 98055 :52304- 9178-09 JENNINGS BEULAH G 14319 37TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 290340 98168 .52304- 9182 -03 MCKINNEY LARRY H 280624 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S 0240 TUKWILA WA 98168 523049186-09 SAMARA - APARTMENTS INC 29229 18TH AVE S FEDERAL' WAY WA 651510 98003 1 004000- 0905 -08 SCHANKEL 900805 2101 S 32411. ST :135 - BELMOR PRK KEOERAL WAY WA 98003 004000 - 0911-00 DEFEO PATRICK +RICHARD 029999 P 0 BoX 488 BELFAIR WA 98528 004000 - 0915 -06 FROST BOYD 4011 S .146TH SEATTLE WA 204400 - 0025 -05 NICHIREN SHOSHU ACADEMY 677777 P 0 BOX 1427 00379-001 SANTA MONICA CA 90406 152304-9010 -01 MCKINNEY LARRY H 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S 0240 TUKWILA WA 280624 t0 • 98168 • 152304-9088-08 MCKINNEY LARRY H 280624 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S 0240 TUKWILA WA 98168 152304- 9140 -04 LIVENG000 LYNN H E0175 5024 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE RENTON WA 98055 152304-9152 -09 MCKINNEY LARRY H 280624 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S 0240 TUKWILA WA 98168 152304-9179 -03 STOKES NORMAN D 14325 37TH AVE SOUTH SEATTLE WA 152304- 9185-00 WEST LENA M 5007 N 8EtI I S SPOKANE WA 152304- 9187 -08 HALL JOYCE A 14331 37TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 839999 98168 521473 99205 290552 98168 to • • 0 0 1 • 1 s •. .• • t".. ****************************************?4***************************************44 * BATCH NUMBER: * CUSTOMER NAME 4.41,4 .1.t-IFV4 4F 4* 4-v4'4444 4.c * 47*- 7.4 4444 004000-0093-00 GUEST FRED K+H VENETIA 2109 COVEMONT DE SE HUNTSVILLE AL AK COMMENTS CARLSON/FERRIN AR N 47447.‘4474444v4474"44474W4441.1.444,:444,4444.,444444Ve-44444.44 N H 004000-0100-01 A .933753 GUEST FRED K+H VENETIA 933753 ::-. r' 2109 COVEMONT.DR.SE 35801 vk: HUNTSVILLE AL- 35801 4 • .. 004000-0105-06 QUINTET INVESTMENT INC 700957 C/O CORNELL.STEWART C ASSOC INC 2633 EASTLAKE AVE E n07 SEATTLE WA 98102 004000-0115-04 SUPERMARKET DEV CORP 9N9999 10700 MERIDIAN'AVE N :SUITE 406 SEATTLE WA 98133 004000-0136-09 EXXON CORP PO BOX 53 HOUSTON TX 004000-0146-07 YOSHIKAWA TERRY 3714 W COMMODORE WY SEATTLE WA 502138 77001 961743 98199 4 004000-0106-05 EIDE THELMA E 14021 SE 200TH KENT WA 057117 98042 004000-0134-01 EXXON CORP PO BOX 53 HOUSTON TX, 004000-0145-08 YOSHIKAWA TERRANCE 3714 W COMMODORE WAY. SEATTLE WA • 004000-0150-00 ALBANESE RALPH G 14424 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S i!: SEATTLE WA 502139 77001 952977 98199 913239 98168 1 •' )EMI I LC WA 98168 004000 - 0190 -02 MIN RICHARD H +MU YEON 709999 16716 145TH AVE SE RENTON WA • 004000- 0194 -08 HOLMES W S & DRBOHLAV 14404 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE WA • 6 004000-0252 -07 CHO YOUNG SOO 14442 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE WA 8' 004000 - 0254-05 KYUNG WAN KIM 706 S MARINE HILLS WAY FEDERAL WAY WA •:. 98055 J E0481 93188 059999 98168 953512 98003 004000- 0294 -07 SUPERMARKET DEVELOPMENT INC909999 10700 MERIDIAN AVE N SUITE 406 SEATTLE WA 98133 004000-0305-04. SUPERMARKET DEVELOPMENT C0R9N9999 10700 MERIDIAN AVE N SUITE 406 SEATTLE WA 9813.3 004000- 0315 -02 JONES V EARLINE 3835 38TH SW • SEATTLE WA 004000- 0327 -08 • D & 8 PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 15134 SEATTLE WA ). 004000- 0844 -02 . ' POLLINGER JOHANN & HILDEGARDC0481 2659 S 150TH 4), WA 98188 876847 98126 7N1330 98115 004000 - 0854 -09 • WYNN HAROLD 2007 5 112TH SEATTLE WA • 004000-0874-05 j WYNN HAROLD 953289 98168 953289 SEATTLE WA • 004000-0191 -01 WATER DIST 125 PO BOX 6147 SEATTLE WA 98188 004000 - 0250 -09 IVIE RANEE 8 3803 S 243RD ST KENT WA 004000 - 0253 -06 OEMULLING DONALD A 14452 PACIFIC HWY .S SEATTLE WA 617777 98188 8N9999 98032 C1274 98168 004000- 0288 -05 SUPERMARKET DEV CORP 9N9999 10700 MERIOIAN AVE N _SUITE 406 SEATTLE WA - 98133 004000- 0300 -09 SUPERMARKET DEVELOPMENT C0R9N9999 10700 MERIDIAN AVE N SUITE 406 SEATTLE WA 98133 004000 - 0310-07 GINN CHESTER L' 3530 S 146TH ST SEATTLE WA R1276 98168 004000 - 0325-00 0 C 8 PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 15134 SEATTLE WA 7N1330 98115 004000 - 0332-01 D & 8 PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 15134 SEATTLE WA 7N1330 98115 004000 - 0853-00 CHEN HENRY & CHEM WEI JEN 872133 4661 138TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 004000-0865-06 OBRIEN TIMOTHY'M 14217 59TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 0681 98188 004000-0890-05 WYNN HARrl1 ft '&11^7. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TASK FORCE MEMBERS BARRERAS, JOSE D. 13220 Military Rd. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 544 -2497 hm: 242 -5854 BOE, ROBERT S. 13514 - 35th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 237 -3304 hm: 242 -7496 BROWNFIELD, PAT 11622 - 24th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 382 -2245 hm: 246 -0764 CARLISLE, DAVID 13819 - 38th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: hm: 242 -9796 DRAGANOV, SHARON 13224 - 32nd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 244 -7641 hm: 242 -0464 FERNAU, DARYL 3215 S. 133rd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: hm: 243 -3326 GJERDRUM, JOHN 3236 S.135th Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 657 -7633 hm: 242 -8759 GREENE, RON & LINDA 3116 S. 133rd St. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 624 -0466 x285 hm: 244 -3388 • • Cascade Task Force Page 2 HENDRICKS, JACK B. 3514 S. 142nd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 244 -7573 hm: 244 -7573 HENDRICKS, MARK R. 3514 S. 142nd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 393 -3229 hm: 244 -7573 HENDRICKS, SUE 3514 S. 142nd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: hm: 244 -7573 JUHASZ, PAUL L. 11849 - 25th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 :wk: 243 -3570 hm: 243 -3570 LIVERMORE, DAVID 13212 - 31st Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 881 -7000 hm: 243 -1512 LUNZ, BETTY 13315 - 34th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: -- hm: 242 -1577 MC GIBBON, RUBY M. 14120 - 34th Place S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 242 -3420 hm: 244 -8427 MOORE, JAY 12627 Military Rd. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: -- hm: 248 -0440 • • Cascade Task Force Page 3 MORTENSON, SCOTT 12634 Military Rd. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 545 -5253 hm: 244 -5308 MULLET, STEVE 3303 S. 132nd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 953 -7009 hm: 241 -6454 SALLE, BERNARDO 13003 Pacific Highway S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 433 -9885 hm: 431- 5483/722 -9022 SCHMAUTZ, JIM & DIANNE 14051 - 35th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: hm: 241 -5477 SCHWALD, DAWN J. 3505 S. 137th Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 621 -6162 hm: 243 -4057 SCOTT, ADELE 13020 - 34th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 682 -6103 hm: 244 -9061 SIMPSON, RICHARD 13832 - 37th S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 526 -3971 hm: 243 -7715 STRIKER, GREGORY W. 14406 - 34th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 244 -1928 hm: 241 -0882 • • Cascade Task Force Page 4 SWEDELUIS, LARRY 3131 S. 133rd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 523 -7541 hm: 242 -3807 THISTLE, FLOYD E. 3226 S. 130th Seattle, WA 98168 wk: -- hm: 242 -0146 THOMS, DALE J. 14031 - 33rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 234 -9575 hm: 243 -0349 THORTON, JERRY B. 3219 S. 142nd Place Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 346 -1749 hm: 753 -6748 WELCH, JOHN T. 2700 S. 133rd Seattle, WA 98168 wk: 242 -5504 hm: Wesley, Lori 13044 34th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98168 wk: hm: 242 -6263 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 TO: Jack Pace FROM: Phil Fraser r DATE: September 13, 1990 PHONE # (206) 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Amendments to Public Works Review of Traffic Impacts/ Mitigations - Larry's Market No. 1 Relocation (Transpo 7/9/90 Study) Following amendments are to the previous input on traffic mitigations for the subject development are as follows: 1. Provide street improvements to South 144th and South 146thStret including the following: 10' right -of -way, curb, gutter and sidewalk with street widening, drainage and utilities relocations as needed or as required. 2. Pacific Highway South: Provide frontal improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage in accordance with Pac Highway section; 84' curb to curb (inside), 5' of planters strip /landscaping and 6' sidewalk. 3. Sign "no protest" agreement for porportionate share of undergrounding for Pacific Highway South. 4. Sign "no protest" agreement for future undergrounding for South 144th Street /146th Street. PF /amc:7:larrys3 it 1 BTANN MARTINEZ . ❑ Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet ❑ Planning Commission Agenda Packet ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda Packet ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit U F U 1 f R LU T L O N hereby declare that: ❑ Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated Determination of Non- significance ❑ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice (❑ Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice O Other ❑ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on WAS PUBLISHED IN THE THURSDAY 9 -13 -90 EDITION OF THE VALLEY DAILY NEWS. Name of Project IARRY'S MARKFT File Number EPIC -18 -90 his certificate prol)es the Department of Health and Building & Land Development with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. King County Bldg. & Land Development Div. Parks, Planning and Resources Department "3600 - 136th PIa3 Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 -1400 KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Do not write in this box number name ❑ Building Permit [] ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ APPLICANT'S NAME A(20 L(i 110(d;1}IY VV YN1a PROPOSED USE 5UPEemARjCEl LOCATION SWC, I44t ST, '4No fFiG HIGHWAYSCUT1 -1- 112V Et2rOM ElEfITS `I Preliminary Plat or PUD Rezone or other SVr2MA2KErDEVEt.wpMEur COPP.) (Attach map & legal description if necessary) # # # # # # # # # # # # # WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a. 0 Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing water main feet from the site. OR Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ( ) -D2'6-- feet of water main to reach the site; and /or O (2) the construction of a distribution system on the site; and /or 0(3) other (describe) 2. a. 1 1 Th -water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive pla OR b. 1 ✓1 The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. # # size 3. a. r-Y The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the distt or city, or is within the county approved service area of a private water purveyc OR b. C] Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a. Water is /or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant t:5(3 feet from the building /property (or as marked on the attached map): OR b. Rate of Flow Duration ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours ❑ 1000 gpm or m're FOR 012 hours or more Dow test of gpm ❑ other calculation of 3 150 0 gpm (Commercial Building Permits require flow test or calculation) lJ Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. COMMENTS/CONDITIONS ALL. %l e.e- 3 cp Y ij pl c- I i l o g ?- L/ civcl 0 :6- c /t1.S:4lied ham{ de vrttyr,e-r1' Per up p ` /2J C0 e) (f c 7� l 0 ei J &- /S 1 q l4c-e vcij- I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true.. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. • Phq Ujee-ick gsT 741/2,r- Agency Name ( Titf4 e —IF 278 f;ci ,k /!k, (eel /- oA) Signatory Name. Signature Date Supermarl41 Development Corporation September 7, 1989 Mr. Frank Pearson King County Water District #125 PO Box 68147 Seattle, WA 98168 Subject: Riverton Heights SWC 144th St. & Pacific Highway South Dear Frank: Enclosed is a King County Certificate of Water Availability, the completion of which is required by the King County Building and Land Development Division for zoning reclassification. Please accept this letter as a request on behalf of Supermarket Development Corporation for your office to complete the certificate. The proposed use of the 5 acre parcel at the above captioned location is for a supermarket. The facility anticipated is in the 55,000 to 60,000 square foot range. While not confirmed, it would be reasonable to expect this store to contain, in addition to the standard supermarket departments, at least a deli, a bakery, and a fresh sea food department. There is also the possibility of an in -store chinese kitchen for the preparation of oriental food. Frank, I am also enclosing a zoning area map, a legal description for the rezone parcels, a legal description for the overall property on which the proposed supermarket would be built, a site plan, and a self- addressed prestamped envelope for your use in returning the completed certificate. You help in completing this form as soon as possible is most appreciated. If I may be of further help, please don't hesitate to call at 365 - 9190. Sincerely yours, SUPE T DEVELOP NT CORPORATION F. Stanton Love FSL /mp 10700 Meridian Avenue N. Suite 406 Seattle, Washington 98133 -9014 (206) 365 -9190 FAX (206) 361 -0434 _9 -1990 15:45 FKUPI Nurtriwe Li.�y _�, h• PRE- AOALICA "llON Project Summary CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 f- FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre - application File # `�() .—c�i b-"Id Date Received: OJZOJ9d Meeting Date p- 610 Timei_:56 Routing: E] BLDG Q FIRE cE--PLNG; Q PWD [J POLICE El PKS & REC 1. PROJECT INFORMATION PeIie1J S-144704 1 5.14wN Project Name t- A(r'(4 1- Y(Y Po 1 Site Addresses Esc PGTerIYIIN, P. Description of Proposal cC 1f(ucflop cE j1 NeW i1 �1-crr Lw itN ar� Arc ) C i 1. Acreage of Site (gross) Anticipated Period of Construction: From '► _ I 1 To -AT 16161 Will project be developed in phases? Ekes No If yes, describe Identify existing easements on site: jI,A 2. BUILDING INFORMATION Total Building Square Footage !�4.1. 3 2_ F • Type of Construction 111 hs (1985 UBC) Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s): BUILDING USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION 1st Floor 2nd Floor. . G;{?1C:' 3rd Floor 7 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE • r,2 ■1.2- t3 Mak AMEN 1---- - - •- -- - ._--- --7-- TOTAL 1 TOTAL (For additional floors please fill out another sheet) Storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on premise or area of construction? ❑Yes Ei No If yes, explain: Number of parking stalls proposed: Regular '2.-it) Compact lel Handicappe44 3. APPLICANT Contact Personat-1406P _ Company r % P Ar 11W Address �i. r C A�1.� . zip_LOI Phone #4H1 - 3C1 Prepared by:_�E1� '�._F ,�� - — Date JOI•-) 91),11110 19' M.eeeei ao-r,erf ke_/77 .A77-' rx.gh 0,,„,(A,,..) ku„, trzte. „iv-% ei ZeILLIVL 4CG,(le p'10516/ kel,a0ZU15 10.714 i2(1 &;%417;02- 3`eeS 1.6-7071, feOre C • ). CeT)VY171a //4/-04- -/ree,,5 (67Air? 14614( 420'1 W0b71C ▪ 1908 City of Tukwila ,t TO: Dpi I.A 130L/A) FAX #:. -t (` -lQ Z. -- - O Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor FROM: .f1 N A) .J I r6e-A T fitdDATE:.f) /1/ / d m PAGES INCLUDING L [ THIS PAGE: FAX #: .51 2 � - -`J Ce 5 PHONE #:._./5(:716 7 U MEMORANDUM 6.24- I Sgt Atm i'): PAW $OLIN g u'. Al4N 4Eca NTKAWA 4 3I 300 PAW. of /10 • M t5 MDNS for lcfirriB Mk +. r;sjit4-. • Fleoe RUB vu¢ a calf ‘va- u1 knccfi roily) 4144 616amtukt. ctat 4-4 6401- (40 demopi i60 *tdorviiihti CTIllbF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NUMBER: (206) 431 -3665 TO: LISA (VALLEY DAILY NEWS) DATE: 9 -11 -90 TITLE: FROM: COMPANY: VALLEY DAILY NEWS TITLE: DIANN MARTINEZ SECRETARY /RECEPTIONIST DEPARTMENT: PUBLISHING DEPARTMENT: DCD FAX NO. 872 -6600 NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED. INCL. THIS COVER SHEET: SENT BY (INITIALS): DM PLEASE PUBLISH ATTACHED PUBLIC NOTICE IN THE LEGAL SECTION OF THE 8WNBAY THURSDAY 9 -13 -90 ADDITION OF THE VALLEY DAILY NEWS. rf4Y.:yn..... r.r ...•..s.,,....y urrry rlx;.... HF.4N?✓Hy,.a.y N+H,YS rn r;rr..:vrr.r:lnr/+.v m .. ty .. ... •••• r..w ... r.r .y r. rr...n•.r.�F : r+r 1. err v••,v IF THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT CLEARLY RECEIVED. PLEASE CALL: 431 -3670 i;}: r.;,; �r.. �•{ fC H•:!'/. 75i`r /,.,rJ.fgY.7:rl/,°.{!1H ^?: 1..:?if :; f %:.¢,'!7rNN�y y {x.v« {.� %N'JJ.ri:v ..N7'�.• {iy:!NN/ ? +ln;rs; {;v {r�; �c;�w.y " ..... .: :;,wr,;�kyyr,..r �. ..w..f /.,.r:r,r:r ,,r. ii r rir r� y.; �•,.;» r�r .Nua:� {a,,rr,.5�.:?� /yir.}rr,: . %•: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Office: (206) 431 -3670 90/15/90 09/11/90 08:59 FAX 206 431 3665 TUK PUB WORKS 2001 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TRANSACTION # 1155 CONNECTION TEL 9*p•8541006 CONNECTION ID A START TIME 09/11 08:57 USAGE TIME 01'48 PAGES 2 A WAC 197 -11 -970 • MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal To construct a 56,000 square foot supermarket, including a cafe and 313 stall parking lot. Proponent Calson /Ferrin Architects Location of Proposal, including street address, if any S. 144th and Pacific Hwy. S.; Section 22,_ Twn. 23. Rue. 4: Tukwila, WA_ Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -18 -90 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS 0 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this 9 -27 -90 proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address , 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwi l 1 9818 D ate 6 •i ? O Signature -♦ Phone 433 -1846 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS PROJECT: DATE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FILE REFERENCE: • • CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Larry's Market No. 1 September 10, 1990 To construct a 56,000 square foot supermarket, including a cafe and 313 -stall parking lot. S. 144th and Pacific Highway South; Section 22, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 Carlson /Ferrin Architects EPIC -18 -90 THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review of this proposal consisted of an analysis based on the following documents included in the environmental record: o Documents from King County (pre- annexation): - Letter from King Co. to Supermarket Development Corp. (5/3/90) - King County Zone Reclassification Application (9/14/89) - Environmental Checklist prepared by Supermarket Development Corp. for King County (9/7/89) o Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Terra Associates for Larry McKinney (4/29/90) o Memo regarding traffic impacts from Tukwila Public Works to Department of Community Development (9/7/90) letter regarding traffic study from WSDOT to City of Tukwila (6/13/90) o Environmental Checklist prepared by Larry's Markets, Inc. for City of Tukwila (7/9/90) o Traffic Impact Analysis by the Transpo Group (7/9/90) o Letter regarding Smokehouse from Larry's Markets, Inc. to City of Tukwila (8/8/90) o Technical Information Report (Soils, Hydrology) by DOWL Engineers (8/10/90) • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 2 BACKGROUND This area was recently annexed to the City of Tukwila (9/1/90). As part of the annexation process, the City Council adopted pre- annexation zoning for this area. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The proposal includes construction of a new supermarket facility, consisting of enclosed supermarket, outdoor cafe, enclosed receiving dock and screened compactor /container. Also included is the construction of a 313 - stall, landscaped parking lot; a storm water runoff control system; installation of perimeter landscaping and sidewalks. To accomplish the proposal, clearing and grading of the site for the building pad and parking lot would be required. No fill would be required. DESIGN FEATURES The materials used for supermarket would include a combination of split face, grey concrete block; corrugated, anodized aluminum siding and roofing; and green- and white - painted aluminum for accent and window trim. The site landscaping would include shade trees in the parking lot; shade trees and lawn along the streets; and barrier shrubs and screening conifers at the rear. PERMITS REQUIRED o Board of Architectural Review approval o Grading permit o Building permit o Utility /street use permits • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 3 CHECKLIST ITEMS A. EARTH The site is mostly flat, with some areas sloped approximately 7 %. Soils consist mainly of gravelly sands, dense silty sands, and localized fill soils. Excavations of up to about 13 feet would be needed to accommodate the development. No fill would be required. The silty sands on the site create a potential for erosion during construction. Installation of permanent subsurface drainage systems along cuts and implementation of standard erosion control measures would mitigate erosion and sedimentation potentials. An underground fuel tank has been removed from the site. Soils from the tank excavation indicated no contamination. B. WATER Approximately 78% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. Storm water runoff from parking areas will contain oil, heavy metals, and other pollutants. Implementation of storm water runoff control system, oil separators and the proposed biofiltration swale would mitigate effects of pollutants downstream. C. AIR Short term impacts to air quality include dust generation and emissions from equipment during construction. Implementation of dust control measures during construction, such as watering exposed soil surfaces and equipment traffic areas, would mitigate short term air quality impacts. Most emissions from on -site food preparation are to be contained within the equipment itself. Consequently, no significant long term impacts to air quality are expected. • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 4 D. PLANTS Currently, tall grass and herbaceous plants cover most of the site, while the upper, west portion contains patches of blackberries. A few mature ornamental conifers and shrubs occur in the southern half of the site. The proposed landscape design adds new trees, shrubs and groundcover, which would help mitigate loss of existing vegetation cover. At the project's southwestern property line, adjacent to an apartment building, is a grove of large, mature shade trees. There is a possibility of damage to the limbs and roots of these trees due to construction activities. (See Condition #1.) E. VISUAL QUALITY The revised development plans submitted (9/7/90) for review by the Board of Architectural Review include features which would affect the visual quality of the site and the surrounding area. Issues such as building design, site and landscape design, glare generated from the project will be addressed as part of the design review process. F. NOISE Operation of construction equipment would result in a short term increase in noise levels near adjacent apartment buildings and surrounding commercial businesses. Limiting construction activities to week days as provided under TMC 8.22.160 would partially reduce short term noise impacts. Some long term noise impacts would be generated by the normal operations of the facility, including deliveries, trash disposal /collection, mechanical equipment operation, and increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The proposed loading dock is recessed approximately eight feet (4' below grade, with 4' wall) which would help mitigate some of this noise. • • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 5 G. TRAFFIC It is estimated that the new supermarket would generate approximately 1,040 driveway trips, with the greatest volume occurring during the weekday p.m. peak hour. To serve the proposed facility, a new access drive would be created on both Pacific Highway South (SR 99) and S. 144th. Currently, the intersection. of SR 99 and 144th is signalized. The SR 99/144th intersection experiences a relatively high accident rate (approximately 12 accidents /year), with half of these accidents attributable to unprotected left turns off of SR 99. Implementation of the proposal is expected to reduce the current level of service at this intersection from LOS C to LOS F. The intersection of SR 99/146th is currently controlled by a stop sign. Increases in traffic generated by the supermarket facility and other sources are expected to decrease the operation of the SR 99/146th intersection from LOS D to LOS E. Pedestrians currently use the site for a diagonal short- cut to residential areas to the west. These pedestrian trips would most likely increase as a result of the proposal, and would shift to the perimeter of the site. Proposed sidewalks provided along streets bordering the site would help mitigate the increase in, and displacement of pedestrian traffic. (See Conditions #2, #3, #4, #5.) Installation of left turn lanes, limiting driveway access, and the addition of traffic signals would help mitigate traffic and safety impacts generated by the proposal. (See Conditions #6, #7.) H. UTILITIES The proposed facility will result in an increase in impervious surfaces and potential runoff. (See Condition #8.) MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate since the environmental review indicates no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. MITIGATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANTS 1. To protect significant trees adjacent to the site, plans submitted for a Grading Permit shall denote drip lines of significant trees in relation to construction limit lines. For significant trees affected by construction, the plans shall specify detailed measures for root and limb protection during construction. TRAFFIC 2. Fronting the Project, a 10' right -of -way on South 144th Street and a minimum 3.5'right -of -way and /or easement for Pacific Highway South (SR 99) shall be dedicated, providing a 6' sidewalk, 5' planter strip and 42.5' of roadway on the west side of the SR 99 centerline. 3. The owner shall sign a No Protest Agreement LID for: A. Commercial street improvements on SR 99 for 84' curb to curb roadway /7 lane configuration, including curb /gutter, sidewalk planting strip, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation /undergrounding, street lighting, and signalization modifications. The Project shall be given credit for right -of way donations and frontal improvements which directly meet improvements or right -of -way requirements for SR 99. • MDNS: Larry's Market 9/10/90 Page 7 3., cont. B. Undergrounding of utilities on S. 144th and S. 146th. 4. The Project shall provide frontal.improvements on S. 144th, S. 146th and SR 99. Improvements are to include 6' sidewalks only, street widening, curb /gutter, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation, street lighting, and signalization modifications. 5. The Project shall provide off -site pedestrian walkway fronting existing Exxon site along SR 99, or 150% cash assignment for these improvements prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Additional traffic analyses shall be conducted for S. 146th and SR 99 intersection prior to issuance of a Building Permit. A. A signal warrant analysis and collision diagram shall be used to determine future intersection improvements. The cost of this analysis is to be shared by the Project and the proposed new motel on 146th (Dondero), based on the contribution of each to intersection traffic. B. The cost of the Project's contribution to future intersection improvements to be determined by the Project's traffic divided by 1990 to 2000 traffic increase. 7. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, channelization shall be evaluated for SR 99 at Project driveway, and for S. 144th at Project's driveway and Kentucky Fried Chicken driveway for left turn storage. UTILITIES 8. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, an evaluation of downstream drainage capacity for runoff from the project site shall be provided. •.+J LC♦ L111L•J Le j- L U►4ues Llje peodirtment of Health and 8u��`lding & Land Developm t (ith information necessary to 'valuate development proposals. Pltle return to: King County ' Building & Land Development Division Parka, Planning and Resources Department 3600 - 136th Mace Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006-1400 KIM cou;ITY CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY �.: tnls Cox nurser name ❑ Buileing Permit • ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Short Subdivision �1� ® Rezone or other PPL =AN'T'S NAME i1AeOLO DO8OrHYWYU1∎1 (Sew- DEVEtQpMq►JT Q p%e 1 J W ?CS_D USE )tIPEeMAi �ET- • )CATION SVJG 144'�`Sr. AN RCIFIGHI®NwAy UT71 l ! • (Attach map t legal description if necessary) / A N A N # 0 0 ! SEWER AGENCY INFORMATION a. OR b. D a. OR b.� a. OR b. ❑ Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4 II t Sewer service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an. existing 2 size sewer 70' feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) and /or feet of sewer trunk or latteral to reach the site ❑ (2) the construction of a collection system on the sites and /or ❑ (3) other (describe) (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) The sewer system improvement is in comprehensive plan. The sewer system improvement plan amendment. conformance with a County approved sewer will require a sewer comprehensive The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. Service is subject to the following: a. Connection charge: b. Easement(s): c. Other: hereby certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This rtification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT Agency Name MANAGER Title 79 T �1, MATELICH Signatory Name -8 -87 S gnature Date 1' Supermarke Development Corporation September 7, 1989 Mr. Terry Matelich Val Vue Sewer District 14816 Military Road South PO Box 68063 Seattle, WA 98168 • Subject: Riverton Heights SWC 144th St. & Pacific Highway South Dear Terry: Enclosed is a King County Certificate of Sewer Availability, the completion of which is required by the King County Building and Land Development Division for zoning reclassification. Please accept this letter as a request on behalf of Supermarket Development Corporation for your office to complete the attached certificate. The proposed use of the 5 acre parcel at the above captioned location is for a supermarket. The facility anticipated is in the 55,000 to 60,000 square foot range. While not confirmed, it would be reasonable to expect this store to contain, in . addition to the standard supermarket departments, at least a deli, a bakery, and a fresh sea food department. There is also the possibility of an in -store chinese kitchen for the preparation of oriental food. Terry, I am also enclosing a zoning area map, a legal description for the rezone parcels, a legal description for the overall property on which the proposed supermarket would be built, a site plan, and a self- addressed prestamped envelope for your use in returning the completed certificate. You help in completing this form as soon as possible is most appreciated. If.I may be of further help, please don't hesitate to call at .365 -9190. Sincerely yours, SUPF/RMARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION F. Stanton Love FSL /mp 10700 Meridian Avenue N. Suite 406 Seattle, Washington 98133 -9014 (206) 365 -9190 FAX (206) 361 -0434 • • !IL__ S E P 7 1990 t,:3-1Y Or t Ji VV LA I-LAN<N NG DEPT. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PHONE 11 (206) 433.1800 Gary L. VanDusen. Mayor TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: 9/7/90 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Impacts /Mitigations - Larry's Market #1 Relocation (Transpo 7/9/90 Study) Public Works has reviewed the TRANSPO 7/9/90 report for Larry's Market #1 Relocation at S. 146th /SR -99 and provides the following comments: 1. Fronting the project dedicate 10 L.F. right -of -way South 146th St., 10 ' L.F. right -of -way on South 144th Street and approximately 3 1/2' right -of -way and /or easements for Pacific Highway South to provide a 6' sidewalk, 5' planter strip and 42.5 of roadway on the west side of the Highway 99 centerline. 2. Sign No Protest Agreement LID for: A. Commercial street improvement Pacific Highway South for 84' curb to curb roadway /7 lane configuration, including C /G, sidewalk plant strip, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation /undergrounding, street lighting, signalization, modifications and undergrounding. Development to be given credit for right -of -way donations and frontal improvements which directly meet improvements or right -of -way requirements of Pacific Highway South 'improvement. B. Undergrounding on S. 144th St. and S. 146th St. 3. Provide frontal improvements on S. 144th St., S. 146th St., and on Pacific Highway South. Improvements to include 6' sidewalks only, street widening, C /G, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation, street lighting, signalizaion/ modifications and undergounding. 4. Provide off -site pedestrian walkway at: A. S.W. corner Pacific Highway South and S. 144th St. fronting existing Exxon site or cash assignment (150 %) for improvement prior to CO. B. S. 146th St. from development property line west to Military Road. Walkway shall be minimum 5' beyond edge of roadway, paved - Construct or provide 150% cash assignment (acceptable to City Attorney) prior to occupancy, if allowed by City Engineer. The City will require future South 146th St. Developer's to reimburse Larry's Market for a proportionate share of the pedestrian walkway. The proportionate share will be based on trip generation and for the pedestrian walkway construction costs. 5. Additional traffic analysis /studies will be made to South 146th /Pacific Highway intersection prior to issuance of Building Permit. A. Signal warrant analysis and collision diagram to be used to determine future intersection improvements. Cost of this analysis to be shared by Dondero and Larry's based on their intersection traffic. B. Costs of future intersection improvements con- tribution to be determined by developer traffic divided by 1990 to 2000 traffic increase. 6. Evaluate channelization prior to issuance Permit: A. Pacific Highway South /driveway B. S. 144th /Larry's driveway and K F left turn storage 7. Evaluation of downstream drainage capacity of runoff from Larry's is being provided (prior to issuance of Building Permit). Full system deficiency identification and correction will be part of the Pacific Highway improvement project (LID) of Building driveway for PF /pf:1 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PHONE k (206) 433.1800 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Rick Beeler K, FROM: Ron Cameron DATE: September 7, 1990 c SUBJECT: South 146th Street Pedestrian Path (Larry's Market - Military Road Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor South 146th Street has no pedestrian facilities between Pacific Highway South and Military Road. The street serves a substantial amount of apartments and condos. It has about 20 feet of width and no shoulder movements. Peds walk in the travelway. We've received complaints at the Council meetings from people about the roadway and no ped facilities. were particular concerns. Phil and substantial ped traffic and walking annexation open houses and at the hazard of having to walk in Comments about school children I have observed the street, seen in the street. The proposed development will increase ped traffic. It should not be approved unless there is a ped improvement. No ped improvement is scheduled, as this has just been annexed. The Developer has agreed to providing it if any other developer within 5 years repays a proportionate share of the ped path cost. RC /amc:5:ped CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: 9/6/90 M E M O R A N D U M PHONE # (206) 433.1800 SUBJECT: Larry's Market - Review of Traffic Impacts/ Mitigations (Amendment to Prior Review Comments) Off -site pedestrian walkway improvements fronting Exxon site at S. 144th Street /SR -99 and along S. 146th Street from West edge of Larry's to Military Rd. The City Engineer, Ron Cameron and myself have reviewed the pedestrian patterns in S. 144th Street, Pacific Hwy. South and S. 146th Street to Military Hwy. We are in agreement with the Traffic Consultant's findings on the existence of a pedestrian pathway along S. 144th Street from the West End of the development to Military Rd.. However, a significant amount of ped. activity was observed along S. 144th Street and SR -99. This ped. movement was in the roadway and constitutes an unsafe mixing of vehiclular and ped. activities. This development will further aggrivate this situation by the addition of ped. /vehicular trips and conflicts along SR -99 and S. 146th Street unless complete ped. links are provided along S. 146th from SR -99 to Mili- tary Rd. and also, along SR -99 from S. 144th St. to S. 146th Street - - -at the time of the development. To properly mitigate these added ped /vehicular conflicts and provided an adequate separation of vehicular and pedestrian activities, the pedestrian walks as described above are necessary. Also, I refer to the 6/13/90 WSDOT letter attached, that identifies 4 ped accidents in the intersection of S. 144th /SR -99 in a three year period. WSDOT states in their letter: "...The subject development will increase pedestrian travel through the intersection. We recommend improvements to pedestrian facilities at the intersection be part of the off -site mitigation for Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor this project..." Public Works staff believe that our prescribed pedestrian walkway at the intersection provides some of this mitigation. xc. Development file: Larry's Market CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 September.6, 1990 Dave Bolin Carlson Ferrin, Architects P.S. 77 South Main Seattle, Wa. 98104 PHONE # (206) 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor RE: Larry's Market at South 146th Street and Pacific Highway South Site Plans (Larry's Market No. 1) Request for Resubmittal Dear Sir: Public Works Department staff has reviewed the site plans and request your plans be resubmitted to address the following comments: 1. On the Utility Permit Application it shall be noted that under water and sanitary sewer permits these permits to be obtained via the Val Vue Sewer District and Water District # 125. Include copies of "Letters of Availability" from Val Vue Sewer District and Water District # 125 and approvals from districts of site plans for their respective utilities with your final site plan submittal to the City. 2. Water: Identify size and type (materials) of existing lines you are tapping into and extending. It is recommended that your water system be brought up to SR99 from dead end line to existing main in South 144th Street to provide for a loop system (refer to Water District 125 for confirmation). 3. Traffic plans to address impacts /mitigations as follows: Per the attached 9/04/90 Memorandum, revise your plan to reflect the required traffic revisions. 4. Provide 2 handicap ramps at 2 intersections instead of the one per intersection as currently shown on plans. 5. Identify General Note on plans: "City of Tukwila Development Standards shall apply by these plans for water, sewer, roadway and drainage improvements ". 6. Sewer: For existing 6" sanitary side sewer, show type of pipe material, invert elevations at connection points to main and building and provide for cleanout at exit of building. (The lines on your drawing indicate side sewer and gas line tied into the roof drain. Please correct and show lines extending into building). 7. Identify outside grease trap with double baffle for proposed restaurant and food processing facilities (refer to Pat Brodin, Senior Sewer and Water Engineer at 433 -0179 for sample). 8. Fire Line: 6" fire service with detector check valve shall be identified in notes per the City of Tukwila's Standard Plan. 9. Water /Sewer /Drainage: Identify size, type of material, bedding, and backfill requirements for water, sewer and drainage systems on the respective site plans. 10. Utility relocates due to new frontal improvements: Refer to City's Undergrounding Ordinance for required undergrounding of all utilities including fire poles, light poles to be relocated on SR99 as part of this development. 11. Page C -3; identify size of restrictive plate on Section 7/4 (control structure). 12. Dowl Engineers TIR (8/10/90) Drainage Study: Complete Section III off site analysis and include /address off -site deficiencies improvements. Requested is resubmittal of the above requested documents along with six (6) sets of revised plans to my attention via the Permit Coordinator addressing the above issues. I will be happy to meet with you and /or your engineers to review our comments to assure that they are appropriately address. At the time of resubmittal it would be appropriate to set up a meeting with myself so that we can go over these many issues for a fuller understanding of how they were addressed through your resubmittal. Please call me at 433 -0179. xc: Permit Coordinator Development File: Larry's Market PF /amc:5:larrys2 September 5, 1990 Mr. David S. Bolin 77 South Main Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Larry's Market No. 1 Dear Mr. Bolin: The intent of this letter is to summarize the status of the Larry's Market design review app ication. As we discussed at our meeting today and by phone last week, the design revisions submitted 81/22/90 by the owner's architect will require substantial modifications in order to satisfy B.A.R. design review criteria. Important design issues related to the building facades along Pacific Highway South and 146th must be resolved before staff can recommend approval of the project. In particular, staff is concerned with the building's • relationship td the street • scale • visual interest, and • quality of materials and finishes. You and the architect have agreed to explore additional design alternatives which would address these issues. Final materials must be re- submitted by Friday, 9/7/90 in order to maintain your scheduled place /on the B.A.R. agenda for 9/27/90. ■ • • Mr. David Bolin 9/5/90 Page 2 As you are aware, the project's SEPA determination must be made prior to the B.A.R. hearing. Accordingly, all SEPA issues must be resolved a minimum of 20 days prior to 9/27/90 (fifteen days for posting plus five days for notice preparation) if the decision requires a public comment period. Planning staff has stressed to Public Works the importance of expediting their review of and response to outstanding traffic issues. Should you have any questions regarding these items, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Ann Siegenthaler Assistant Planner �y. • • CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVAR." L5 1( //„ \1). TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: 9/4/90 � �'J UI� I J t'1 1 PHONE 11 (206) 433.18 CITY Or i LAVV LA ° PLANNING tlErPIF,VanDese 4uiANDUM Mayor (FA 46 per 661/44AA E W46 co./14414w/ tzm, Pitu, ,I3bLih; TrriAtsrOi nowt SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Impacts /Mitigations - Larry's Market #1 Relocation (TRANSPO 7/9/90 Study) Public Works has reviewed the TRANSPO ,7/9/90 report for Larry's Market #1 Relocation at S. 146th /SR -99 and provides the following comments: S. 146th Street: a. S. 146th Street is considered a local collector street with only 40 ft. right -of -way; 60 L.F. right of way is required. The development shall donate their half of needed R/W (10 L.F.) as part of development. b. Frontal improvements along S. 146 Street, to include drainage, undergrounding, 6 foot sidewalk, associated roadway, rechannelization and utility relocations. Per the City's Undergrounding Ordinance, relocation of power poles is necessary, as part of Development. o c. A paved pedestrian walkway on South 146th between the development west property and Military is required to offset impacts of this Development. The walkway is to provide a pedestrian travelway out of the roadway for increased pedestrian traffic. d. The development shall participate in its proportionate share for a future S. 146th Street /SR -99 signalization. Increase in ADT Increase 1990 -1992 ADT In order to complete our review of this traffic analysis Public Works requests a collision diagram /accident path for the intersection of S. 146th Street and Pacific Hwy. South (SR -99) be provided as part of this analysis. Accident records from the State are to be used in your analysis. A signal warrant analysis is required. Specific evaluation of pedestrians is also needed and include peds crossint Pacific Highway South at 146th. SR -99 (PACIFIC HWY SOUTH): a. SR -99 is a principal arterial. A channelization diagram, identifying existing R/W shall be provided, verified per WSDOT 6/13/90 letter and include proposed frontal improvements for City review to determine final R/W donations acceptable frontal improvement locations if needed. Frontal improvements shall be per WSDOT's 7 lane configuration, (84 ft. curb to curb). b. RE: Item No. b under S. 146th Street o c. This development will contribute significant ped trips along SR -99 from development to intersections of S. 146 and S. 144th. Therefore, off- site pedestrian walkway (paved) link to be provided from the development's North property line along Exxon site to S. 144th Street and on South 144th Street between Larry's and Pacific Highway South. d. The issue of the proposed SR -99 mid block access to the development for full access or right in /right out can not be determined until the SR -99 channelization plan has been submitted to the City for review. The channelization plan needs to show opposing driveways. S. 144th Street a. The channelization diagram needs to identify dimensioning of roadway; location of existing roadway and exsiting R /W; and identification of existing (and proposed if information is available) access points for businesses on north and south sides of S. 144th Street that relate to proposed S. 144th Street channel - ization. Particularly, it needs to show left turn access to both sides of South 144th Street. This information is needed before the city can determine appropriateness of the rechannelization diagram, frontal improvements and intersection improvements in S. 144th Street. b. RE: Item b under S. 146th Street c. S. 144th Street is considered a local collector street with only 40 L.F. of existing right -of -way. 60 1.f. R/W shall be its final width. By this development, a 10 1.f. right of way is to be dedicated for your half of the right of way donation as part of this development. Show on your channelization and site plans. Finally, in developer's up by WSDOT. follows: reference to the WSDOT letter of 6/13/90, the traffic engineer needs to addres issues brought Specific issues the City wants addresed are as a. Peak Periods - AM and noon b. Pass by - drivebys c. Driveways In review of DOWL Engineer's Technical Information Report - Hydraulic Analysis for Larry's Market dated 8/10/90, the off -site analysis in Section III of this report was provided with a blank form, not filled in. This analysis requested at the time of the City's Development Review Committee meeting has not been provided by this report. Therefore, requested is this down stream analysis so we may determine the adequacy of the downstream storm drainage infrastructure, and associated impacts of this development. Also, as stated in the DRC meeting, additional analysis of this drain system beyond the 1/4 mile may be required after further review. In order for Public Works Staff to complete their review of the development impacts /mitigations, the above issues need be addressed through a submittal of ammendments to the traffic report and hydraulic analysis. 7/ CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: 9/4/90 9: i DUM ( 6 (r N I V;I:7Ni 9 SF S 1g4n CITY (Jr 1;;s:wy't.L.i. ;. PHONE # (206) 433.18 0 p LAN NI N ( [ 'p VOADBs4t. Mayor SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Impacts /Mitigations - Larry's Market #1. Relocation (TRANSPO 7/9/90 Study) Public Works has reviewed the TRANSPO 7/9/90 report for Larry's Market #1 Relocation at S. 146th /SR -99 and provides the following comments: S. 146th Street: a. S. 146th S Street is considered a local collector street with only 40 ft. right -of -way; 60 L.F. right ofoway is required. The development shall donate their half of needed R/W (10 L.F.) as part of development. 4/ b. Frontal improvements along S. 146 Str t, to include drainage, undergrounding, 6 foot sidewalk, associated roadway, rechannelization and utility relocations. Per the City's Undergrounding Ordinance, relocation of power poles is necessary, as part of Development. ■, . A paved pedestrian walkway on South 146th between the `��, development west property and Military is required to ` 1b��{ offset impacts of this Development. The walkway is to Q provide a pedestrian travelway out of the roadway for l increased pedestrian traffic. u 0 c, (4)? COQ) h /etl -, d. The development shall participate in its proportionate 11 share for a future S. 146th Street /SR -99 signalization. \ Increase in ADT . • Increase 1990 -1992 MART 1 4/361- In order to complete our review of this traffic analysis IN 1.10 • Public Works requests a collision diagram /accident-path for . the intersection of S. 146th Street and Pacific Hwy. South (SR -99) be provided as part of this analysis. Accident records from the State are to be used in your analysis. A' signal warrant analysis is required. Specific evaluation of pedestrians is also needed and include peds crossing Pacific Highway South at 146th. SR -99 (PACIFIC HWY SOUTH): a. SR -99 is a principal arterial. A channelization diagram, identifying exist g R/W shall be provided, verified per WSDOT 6/13/90 1 tter and include proposed frontal improvements for. City review to determine final R/W donations acceptable' frontal improvement locations if needed. Frontal improvements shall be per WSDOT's 7 lane configuration, ,&ee A-/ / (84 ft. curb to curb) . it/o Z�0 Gi/✓" /-52-, G ri vuue /%a) AP b. RE: Item No. b under S. 146th Street V0 This development will contribute significant ped trips along SR -99 from development to intersections of S. 146 and S. 144th. Therefore, off- site pedestrian walkway $ (paved) link to be provided from the development's North property line along Exxon site to S. 144th Street and on South 144th Street b tween Larry's and Paci is Highway South. /-p �l� 0,- 0,� ' 1 Ses . e,- 71- / d. The issue of the proposed SR -99 mid block access to the development for full access or right in /right out can not be determined until the SR -99 channelization plan has been submitted to the City for review. The channelization plan needs to show opposing driveways. S. 144th Street a. The channelization diagram needs to identify dimensioning of roadway; location of existing roadway and exsiting R /W; and identification of existing (and proposed if information is available) access points for businesses on north and south sides of S. 144th Street that relate to proposed S. 144th Street channel - ization. Particularly, it needs to show left turn access to both sides of South 144th Street. ///.C�c6- - nu:r y fA) This information is needed before the city can determine appropriateness of the rechannelization diagram, frontal improvements and intersection improvements in S. 144th U� IF b. RE: Item b under S. 146th Street c. S. 144th Street is considered a local collector street with only 40 L.F. of existing right -of -way. 60 1.f. R/W shall be its final width. By this development, a 10 1.f. right of way is to be dedicated for your half of the right of way donation as part of this development. Show on your channelization and site plans. Finally, in reference to the WSDOT letter of 6/13/90, the developer's traffic engineer needs to addres issues brought up by WSDOT. Specific issues the City wants addresed are as follows: a. Peak Periods - AM and noon b. Pass/ :y - drivebys c. Drivewa s In review of DOWI, Engineer's Technical Information Report - Hydraulic Analysis for Larry's Market dated 8/10/90, the off -site analysis in Section III of this report was provided with a blank form, not filled in. This analysis requested at the time of the City's_Development Review Committee meeting has not been provided by this report. Therefore, requested is this down stream analysis so we may determine the adequacy of the downstream storm drainage infrastructure, and associated impacts of this development. Also, as stated in the DRC meeting, additional analysis of this drain system beyond the 1/4 mile may be required after further review. OliIn order for Public Works Staff to complete their review of the development impacts /mitigations, the above issues need be addressed through a submittal of ammendments to the traffic report and hydraulic analysis. �` I Cor.'rol No. Permit No.(001 1 f- 11) .90 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 • WATER METER PERMIT (PERMANENT) (,wWr'Eit_ oNL1*) Issue Date Q;- a'5i-Q(: Expiration Date 1(1- aq -610 SITE ADDRESS 12770 Gateway Drive NAME OF PROJECT Boeing Credit Unio NAME OF OWNER Boeing Employees Credit Union PHONE 544-3447 ADDRESS 7700 East Marginal Way Seattle, Wa. ZIP 98108 NAME OF CONTRACTOR SDL Corporation PHONE 455 -2101 ADDRESS 2100 112th Ave. N.E. Bellevde-, wa. Zr 9b009 MONTHLY SERVICE BILLING TO: BECU 7700 E. Marginal Way S. Seattle, Wa. 9bi08- TYPE OF INSTALLATION: Ei Single - family [I Multi - family - Number of units: ititNNUMBER OF METERS: 1 IZE OF METER(S): 0 1" 0 1" 0 1i" Q2" Q3" Q4" Commercial /Industrial - Number of s9Aarere,g t• 9495 6" (Motel /Hotel - Number of its: / Other " FEES: Regular Connection 'JE PAID: ?,)6/ cJ�_� (401/388.102) $ Install. Fee (deposit) L, v RECEIVED BY cIIi'vi (401/386.520) $1, 000.00 Admin. Plan Check ,t 11 (000/345.830) $ 10.00 •' ��� %7 Inspection Fee (401/342.400) $ 15.00 Turn -on Fee v� DEVELOPER'S COST TO CONSTRUCT (401/343.405) $ 25.00 \ K, WATER METER BOX AND SERVICE 1 200.00 FROM MAIN TO TOTAL: $ �(` METER BOX IS $1,200.00 v �� - RECEIPT NO REFUND /BILL TO: BECU SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: (401/388.101) $ I understand that the charge for the meter i, tal installation is based on the actual cost of u. I agree to pay the installation fee (deposit) on balance of the cost when billed (overpayment will the regular connection charge, administrative pia fee as part of this application. GATE PAID: RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO.: a on portion of the water meter /service s •lus labor including 17% overhead. the 'ping of this application and the e re unded). Further, I agree to pay ec fee, inspection fee, and turn -on I further understand that the water service piping from the public main to the water meter box and shut -off valve (curb stop) shall be constructed at my sole expense. I understand this document constitutes the bill of sale and list of materials (see reverse side), and I agree upon completion of its installation and sign -off of this permit that these facili- ties are hereby turned over to the City to operate and maintain. Water line to the building must al be inspected b the Water Department (433- 1860). • APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ,�+�.L,. !J T7i.t-/'' TITLE Ao -e 4_ 3 , .7er Approved By: / cc: Applicant Inspector Senior Accountant City Shops -Water Dept. INSPECTOR USE ONLY I hereby certify that the permit holder whose name and address appears on this record has satisfactorily met the standards and conditions f r the project approved herein. 6 3 Field Inspection Date tai- % City Inspector Work Order # This permit was not signed -off because (U .WMDD 1 11 Initials Date s) • <c-' w� BILL OF SALE KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, That ��ee in 7'.,1 7 er5 6e,0,/, a general p rtnership and existing by virtue of t e law o the ' �` "` ^ , and doing business in the f State of located a i277o 64.4cw�Y 2),-.',e. , City of a.e. ,; e� Washington, in �.7� County, for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) lawful money of the United States, to it in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the City of Tukw la the following described personal property, located at )Z77O 64.4e..", Dr., City of Tukwila, Count of K' State of Washington, to wit: Y ing, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: /a "2 -) 0 Graz w4-1 P2_ _ LIST OF MATERIALS /ASSET DESCRIPTION (Number of) / water meter box(es) (located at the above address and (number of) ya linear feet of (size 2.- -inch meter service line(s), with appurtenances, made of (e) SiQ installation cost of $ /200'. �- material, with an for this turnover. , constitutes the list of materials The seller herin convenants, agrees and warrants that it is the owner of said property and that the same is free from all liens and encumbrances and that it will defend the sale of said property, made, against all and every Y goods, and chattels, hereby mad same or to ry person or persons whomsoever, lawfully claiming y part thereof. EXECUTED at (City) this 2$ day of 4'..y ..-s 1 , Washington, , 19 f . SELLER: EDGin, BY: -. TITLE s Pr�G E...t meet. BY: TITLE: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of On this day personally appeared before me _ to me known to be the individual described nand who xecu ed the ithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for th signed nde purposes there mentioned. e uses and in , fo GIVEN under my hand and official seal this Jf day of 19� . eun�r '', � ........ ... •• Imo, .�. i , . �*- • - Notary Public in and for the Sta 0. p JG M i Z1 Washington residing at • .'.P.; OF wASI-ts 7a: c P 1.' ANA! 37- avi r kt -rh1- POale Wolegs 7S -aer fr/16`go I av l o; emep-m ots vaa pdvg i61� �.�f ply'.• 7 / &e —4.10; es 77.71 elexik ale at/es - rccaki,; QX ? Otemieles 'dad; sepdziled r /l/ eee il/gd on g zo a idea-- 67- INT,1 : �� s� //ss-tees 90,74 47e.wer e44s 0:0t «�� Peestity -Worms 5skak s 7,1; idavaad e .,1417 W .0� ? 4 '/ 7 116 :1- getattftidedi it • CITY QF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN LAND 11;E PERMIT ROUTING FORM PERMIT NO.: WIC- I$ -10 PROJECT ADDRESS Parksiaec Piaase review the attached prvjscta plans and respond with ap roriate .: Indicate 'crucial concerns. by checking the box next to the lino s on h h that cin the `space below,' :...: ...> t..::! .... ;..:, . nncern fs noted �: � L� Page 16 - Item # 14d - Ron Cameron, City Engineer is currentl reviewing the traffic study and he is in contact with Trans o. Y will provide his comments with regards to impacts and mitigations for new roadways, sidewalk and other street pr right -of -way) to Ann after Transpo's response toem his s resubmittal requests (includes addressing WSDOT's 6/13/90 letter). Page 17 - 16a - Water - Require an availability letter from Water District #125 to confirm that water is available and /or an infrastructure requirements are necessary. Y Page 17 - 16a - Require a sewer availability letter from Val Vue Sewer District to confirm sewage system is available and any impacts or mitigations to sewer system will be required as a result of this Development. Page 7 - Item c.,1) - Development shall provide hydrological analysis for downstream system from Development to river prior to Public Works final determination of questions in this catagory and /or any mitigations required as a result of this development. Y pacts = and hydraulic analysis shall be per King County 1990 Design Manual. G ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested Plan a ❑ p ro Plan check date: e I / U Comments prepared by: CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LAND OE PERMIT ROUTING FORM PERMIT NO.: PlC- 1810 PROJECT ADDRESS Buildin Iaonin ':... Pub Wks: IU 1e r- Nau I 4iet tr ty *St. DATE TRANSMITTED 7//o STAFF COORDINATOR /i,o Lam( • Please review the attached.,: proje plans and respond.`with :appropriate ! >carnme.nts in the` space below. Indicate crucial concerns by checking the box next to the lines) an which that concern .is `noted.... Fire. Police RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /g/,j DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED ❑ ftizie koi, bw cgh e ❑ Gin s e,uc 9 sada J 76q ;us 7 ❑ �� 07. ik -P06 s77 s- s- 6 e m Pi sa. ., ❑ cez,id � 07. ,,,e-f , r n ❑ 1 1 / /JUG 1 1990 ❑ ❑ a ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: s Y OF TUKWILA LAND JOE PERMIT ROUMG FORM D PARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: EPIC- 18-/O PROJECT ADDRESS /ARR`ig km T- N 146.1 1444 f' rscqcr, %4. 4 DATE TRANSMITTED 7 /loo STAFF COORDINATOR Aryl 47" tease reiniew the . attached projects plans Inc respond wi #h appropriate rn erl #s in the; space below. Indicate cruciat concerns by checking the box. next tq the ;line(s) on which that concern is noted RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /g/�ji3 (01,c0 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Ithle ❑ / e L e Y,�G4 Goul.�G GG 9szrr>sGIr,& J ` I' '75% a4vel2e TteigeG T ❑ //4' 5-9YGZUZik part do2ed77QXs- g- 6a rn liI? P.rc. /hip, SO. g ❑ �.� d � n ,d,�y�,� ree7.40E ! n ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: 09/08/89 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LAND ilk PERMIT ROUTING FORM PERMIT NO.: tC- 18-10 TO: PROJECT ADDRESS 1,7APVg I T— Neu, Isla. 1, ,61)40- retix,frz 7A4A0 STAFF COORDINATOR A M 4.; DATE TRANSMITTED RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /g/�,j (pj DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Please review the attached projects plans and respond with appropriate comments in the space below Indicate crucial concerns by checking the box next to the Iine(s) on which that concern is noted. Li //hu ,Aiit 6— e Hikei-wfaTeem46,4 fizM'ar.& iretece. 75% GLxper0. .%245 TrarAteG n „7 �1 &i -poc 3- s- 6 d N P.r,,. _ g eedry Fl U n DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: 09/08/89 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LANDeSE PERMIT ROUTING FORM PERMIT NO.: EPIC- 18-10 TO Building [Punning IX Pub Wks .First ParkstRec PROJECT 1 /ARZ ' ti��-e i r— NEW t40 L� ADDRESS rs /t� %4. DATE TRANSMITTED """`� 7/) /0 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY g (p) STAFF COORDINATOR �'w 6�w G f �( COO DINATOR - �Srk►'l DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Please review the attached projects plans and respond with appropriate comments in the space bele., Indicate crucial concerns by checking the box next to the lines) on which that concern is noted. ❑ /fizz try ? i ziY,ir GA G _ sGr it ,75% v245' TizeAte ❑ �� tea« ,-�� n s- 5-,bated Pe6. Alurr so_ ❑ ='! 1,07-x/7; ,7. ❑ 4697(i ,d ❑ a El ❑ DRC review requested Plan check date: —/— ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan Comments prepared by: 09/O8/86 Acinplairkets 14900 Interurban Ave. So., Suite 275 • Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206 - 243 -2951 cc;/t .OrZizze D 6t' August 8, 1990 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Ann Siegenthaler Re: Smokehouse I am writing this letter in response to your concerns about our Smokehouse. Our Smokers consist of two pieces of equipment; the Smokehouse Oven and the Smoke Generator. The Smokehouse is a stainless steel, roll -in, convection oven (low temperature). It is heated with electricity. The Smoke Generator provides smoke to the oven. It works by dispensing cleaned alder chips onto an electrically heated plate. It holds 10 lbs. of chips at a time but uses only what is needed. The chips come in 40Ib. plastic bags and we keep 2 to 4 bags in stock. This Smoker will be used to smoke seafood, approx. 1000IbJday or one rack per day. To smoke one rack will take 1 to 2 lbs. of chips during a 3 to 4 hour time period. Larry's Markets currently operates three "Smokehouses ", two in Seattle and one in Kirkland. We have never had a complaint from neighbors about smoke or smells. Enclosed is an engineering report, "Environmental Quality Concerns ", from Enviro -Pak, the manufacturer of the equipment. I hope that this will answer your EPA concerns. The Smoker that we plan to use in our new store will be moved from our existing store which is right across the street at 14227 Pacific Hwy. S. You are welcome to look at it and we can even walk around outside the store to try to smell it. Larry's Markets does want to be a good neighbor. Si c rely, John Sabee Director of Store Planning NM Q AU G 101990 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • • iEmriro-Pak August 6, 1990 Mr. John Sabey LARRY'S MARKETS 14900 interurban Ave. S, Suite 275 Seattle, WA 98168 RE: ENVIRO -PAK OVENS Dear Mr. Sabey: Thank you for-calling and advising of your possible problem with the local EPA. Included is a general writeup that we have supplied to otters in the past when such a confrontation arose. We believe this should be of help to you and to the inspector. Also included are bulletins on various Enviro -Pak ovens for your review. We would like to talk to you sometime about the differences in Enviro -pak ovens versus Vortron or Koch. Let us know if we can help further. Sincerely, ;Gil Martini, ident GJM /nb 2'd AU G 101990 CITY L: , ..� b �. , LA PLANK C TPT. 15450 S.E. Fur•MorCt. •Cldc% -._. 1-100-T1.1-OVEN • 503 - 655 -7R FAX -,;3_;;: -=, f33f 0 A Division of Tech•Mark. Inc, 89E9SS9E0S >1dUW —H931 : =:0 U6, tint! MINI -PAK FORCEPAIR OVEN SERIES 0 I 2 ;• Puts a new profit center into any retail operation • Also ideal for the smaller volume manufacturer • Unmatched versatility for hams. bacons, roast beef, prime ribs, pastrami, turkey, chicken, sausages and fish. • Cuts cooking time significantly over other systems • Provides absolute product uniformity • Total range of options and accessories for economy, convenience and efficiency with any product With any other smokeoven you may see only a few of these features... •: All stainless steel construction with welded seams • Fully adjustable, gasketed air intake and exhaust dampers • Product shower, pre -piped and fitted (350 size and up) • Built -in smoke chip pan (hand load units) burns natural hardwoods (optional) SPECIFICATIONS • interior disassembles for fast. easy cieanin0 • Floor drain built into stainless steel floor • High density insulation assuring energy efficiency • High volume air recirculation for fast cookie =d and smoking • Complete, easy installation in trJctions for "do -it- yourself" ..one point hookup for each utility is all that is required • Dozens of cooking recipes and tips for all woes at products • Stainless steel truck(s) — models 350, 490 and 980 • Ten smokesticks included with all Mini -Pak ovens ...with Enviro -Pak, you get them ail! Model Dimensions Approx. Floor Space Required Truck Sizes Electrical cleating j stow. Shipping tape. j HP i peight CVU- 150E(HL) 38"w , 411!2 "d• 64 "h 3 1/2'w x 7'd NA 11saaov 1 Ph/60 Hz 3 INd i ;/d 1 600 lbs. CVU- 350E(HL) ' 48 "w 51 1/2 "d' 82 "h 4 1/2'w x 8'd NA 'I'P ?60° i4 ,; 1 3/4 1 1100 lbs. CVU-350E(i) 48 "w 51 1/2"d• 82 "h 1 4 112'w x 8'd 31 3/4 "w x 36 "d x 58 "h ' " , , H _ :v 4 1 300 Ibs, CVU•490E(r) 53 "w 51112 "d' 89 "h I 4 112'w x 9'd 33 "w x 40 "d x 66 "h ioevra 270 N •5 ' {v 1 2 1 .600 lbs. CVU- 980E(T) 53 "w 981/2 "d• 89 "h : 4 1/2'w x 12'd 33 "w x 40 "d x 66 "h 230vr3 Ph/60 HE 2a3V /3 Ph/60 Hz j ' w _ _ 2.100 lbs. 'Door and rear accessories removable — deduct 11 1/2 ". "Does not include area for servicing or local fire and electrical code requirements. Floor area dimensions do not Include space requirements for control panel. OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES "Mlcro'Pak" Control— microprocessor totally automates oven con- trol, accepts unlimited programming, eliminates Toss from errors. _mechanIcal Backup System "Envtro-Gen" Smoke Generators —fully automatic units produce ke. Hooper -fed, up to 10 -hour capacity. "Envtro•Mist" Liquid Smoke Atomizer --all stainless steel system offers more uniform product, easier cleaning, no pollution or fire hazard. Internal Meet Probe —tells product temperature at a glance. Oven shuts off or sounds alarm automatically when pre -set product tem- perature is reached. Automatic shower optional. EmPak Specifications `:tec' .c _hand. notice Humidifer— vaporizer unit to produce rr =.murn yield and prevent moisture loss. Recorder —probe option to provide perm. nsnt record of cocking. Screens and SmokestIcics —each oven order includes 10 smoke- sticks, and additional sticks may be ordered- All•stalnless steel screens available for a wide variety of products. Built-In Steam Generator —may be used `c' -team cooki =r for humidity to prevent moisture loss (avaiiab1e 01 all models except 980). 15450 S.E. For -Mor Ct. For more information call toll-free: Clackamas, OR 97015 1- 800 - 228 —OVEN FAX: 503 - 655 -6368 In Oregon: 503.655 -7044 2'd Distributed by more tt Tn 611 dl trIbutOrS located throughout the U.S., Canada, Mexico and New Zealand 89E9SS9E0S >16t1W —H331 '__ : ,L_, OE, r • • Engineering Repgrl Subject: Environmental Quality Concerns To: All Sales Personnel A number of times over the years we have encountered situations where loca]. "Environmental Quality Departments' have raised a question or an objection to a pending installation of one of our ovens. Their question or objection came about due to misinformation or lack of knowledge of our particular oven design. We are confident that the problem arises when someone refers to o,ne of our ovens, either verbally or in writing, as a "smokehouse ". Immediately, this conjures up "dragons belching fire" in the minds of the DEQ people, especially since they believe they are the only true guardians of our air quality. Our ovens are just that, "ovens ", in which baking, cooking, drying, steaming of a variety of food products can take place. An "yes ", if someone wishes to add "smoke" -for smoke flavoring, that. can be accomplished as well. Obviously, it is the addition of "smoke" that alarms the DEQ. But let's look at the modern ways in which "smoke" is added. An understanding of the oven and its workings should calm all fears. Smo' - - - or can be added in a number of ways. If flavor is a soaking, the product smoke has be a marinade or bri ced. product is smoke flavor, but no actual ke flavor is brushed on t• roduct, no smoke will be produced. - If smoke is added in vapor form it is done in one of two ways: 1) ,iqui4 ftmoke System. Liqui• -moke (a chemical derivative of wood tars) can be atoms • within the oven into a fine "fog" th coats the pr • ct (and all the surfaces ; the oven) . This pro.. s a smoke flavor. - . again, no smoke "fog" leaves - - oven. U- nitiating the liquid smoke system, - - •wer is turned off automatically, as is th - =t - the gasketed intake and exhaust damper- - "closed ". -- • -mpers will not open until - quid smoke "dwell" time occurred. By that - e no "vapor" exists. 5d 89E9SS9EOS >i6tiW -H331 bU Dl ;H • • 2) Natural Smoke Generator If smoke is created by placing hardwood chips on a not plate, natural smoke is created. The generator is always at a negative pressure (in other words, the smoke must travel to the oven) . But here again, as in the previous example,, when "smoke" is required the intake and exhaust dampers are closed and only the smoke damper is open., The smoke is recirculated and recirculated until it has been entirely deposited on the product or the inner surfaces. The "smoke cycle " -is always shorter than the cook cycle, so there is time to thoroughly evacuate the smoke generator and allow it to cool before the end of the cycle. Therefore, there is no or little smoke that can escape from the oven. Whatever amount, it is less than EPA allowances. Hopefully, this gives you sufficient data to answer any future objection. • b ' d 89E9SS9E0S >i6dW -H931 •v L pp ; tO N CO r co OO U m O L 7) e0 G1 C r •r• W •r• C U 7 .0 N ~ 4- O CO O CO r O • Y •r• 1', 7 U 40 F- = U 411,k) to el nArtn tz.4401* II • Purpose of Checklist: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 010 kfl_M ` 111V11 101 • JUL 10 1990 9,A PLANNING DEPT. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ContrIko. Epic File No. ' /G- /c5 —?' Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST '�� & (),\ A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Larry's New No. 1 2. Name of applicant: Larry's Markets, Inc. (David Bolin, Owner's Representative) 3. Address and phone number of appl icant and contact person: 77 South Main, Seattle, WA 98104 (624 -1886) Contact: Carlson /Ferrin Architects, P.S., 1925 Post Alley, Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Terre Meinershagen 4. Date checklist prepared: 7/9/90 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence Construction: Early Fall 1990 Completion: Summer 1991 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Redevelopment of existi g commercial building and site on adjacent property North of South 144th Street in the future. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1. SEPA Checklist & DNS (Mitigated) (King County Submittal) 2. Traffic Impact Analysis, dated 7/9/90, prepared by the Transpo Group, Inc. 3. Preliminary and Final Geo- Technical Study , prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 4. Preliminary and Supplemental Environmental, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 1. State Highway Access Permit - Highway 99 2. Standard Site and Building Construction Permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Retail Supermarket Facility with Landscaped Parking Area,, Standard Enclosed Receiving Dock and Screened Compactor /Container. Building Size Approximately: 55,000 SF Site Size: 218,941 SF 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If•a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Location: Between South 144th and 146th Streets on West Side of Pacific highway South Riverton Heights, (Sec. 22, TWP. 23, RGE 4) Legal Description, Vicinity Map, Topographic Map Submitted w thBAR$ubmittal. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): 'Flat,` rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand with varying degrees of gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading to smooth site for building pad and parking areas. No fill will be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Small amounts of erosion could occur during construc- tion activity in areas of existing or proposed slopes, depending on weather. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% Evaluation for Agency Use Only edge /.Ydst • 4ropy9X.15 % • Evaluation fdr Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Attempt to complete site and grading work during dry season. Provide erosion control standards and Construction in accordance with City of Tukwila standards. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and Vehicle Emissions during construction. Private Vehicle Emissions upon completion. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 410 Ilk Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the .project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach . available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would` be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Trench drain will be utilized to lower seasonal perched ground water table along west side. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if. any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain leaders from building will discharge directly into existing storm drain system. Surface water from paved areas will be collected and detained in underground facilities. Oil separator and BioFiltration swale will be used. Release rate will be maintained at PreDevelopment levels or lower. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4IM II! Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Compliance with City of Tukwila Runoff and Water Quality Standards. Collection, storage, and release as described in 3.C. 1 above. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation Lots of weeds b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Small trees, shrubs, other organic material. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping as indicated inBARSubmittal. Nature Wetland type plants at Pad Filtration Swale. Other plant materials selected for durability, screenin y ar round and seasonal color. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Planting near BioFiltration Swale selected to provide food and cover for small birds and mammals. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 7'- rea;4- hear' slhi s s6i- anl' 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and Natural Gas for heating, cooling, refrigeration, lighting, and general retail operation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building to comply with current Energy Code requirements, refrigeration system equipped with heat reclaim for domestic hot water and space heat. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only -�- � � ,6orc6goe-0( • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction Noise. Private Vehicular Traffic. Loading Dock operations. Roof Top refrigeration and HVAC equipment. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Building. Screen Walls, Retaining Walls, and Landscaping will help reduce noise to surrounding prQpgrty. Location and screening of roof .. -.'., - • e noise im•act. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently vacant. Adjacent properties are commercial uses North, Soutfi, and East; Multifamily residential to the West. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 50 -60 Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The retail supermarket is compatiable with C -2 Zoning and existing uses on surrounding properties. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what, is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 31' -6" Mean height above average grade 35' -0" Max ridge height Principal materials are painted concrete block and metal siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views from East to Multifamily housing on West side would be reduced. Views onto site would be improved from vacant lot to building and landscaping. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Screen walls and planting at loading areas. Increased landscape areas around parking and building. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of, day would it mainly occur ?. Parking lot lighting during evening and night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existingstreet lighting will aid in safety and security. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Building and Parking Area lighting will be selected with cutoff provisions to prevent glare to adjacent properties. Focus of lighting will be on building and parking surface to promote safety and convenience. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Unknown. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportationo a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Surrounded by South 144th, Pacific. Highway South and South 146th, access will be from South 144th and Pacific Highway South.. See Site Plan submitted with BAR. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Provide 210 standard. 99 compact, 4 handicapped 313 Stalls Total. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads_ or streets. Improvements to streets as ;described in attached Traffic Study for City of Tukwila requirements. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 11,312 trips per day Peak volumes would occur - P.M. peak hour. See attached Traffic Study. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Location of Site Access, and Street Improvements per Traffic Study. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. In fact, as operation is maintained, supervised and lighted 24 hours a day, security_ should improve over that of an 'empty lot'. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N /A; Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities • a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: jelectricityl lnatural gas,' jwateri !reuse service] septic system, other. Cable Television b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utilities to be provided from currently available sources. Some improvements to off-site water will be required. Construction will be for hook -ups. C. Signature. The above answers my knowledge. I relying on them Signature: are true and complete to the best of understand that the lead agency is i s ec'sion. Date Submitted: July 10, 1990 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only CARLSON /FWRIN A R CH We are sending _ ou the following: Attached /❑ Prints ❑ Submittal ❑ Under Separate Cover ❑ Originals ❑ Samples ❑ For Your: ❑ Information and Use ❑ Preview and Comment ❑ As Requested Action Required: ❑ As Indicated ❑ No Action Required ❑ For Signature & Return If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. ix TRANSMITTAL To: C1-11 df LLLtzwr.t fi _` 0 50)...11.(16a1F2 w0 u,le -uu tc.� Ilil Attention: T MEMORANDUM T S Injil..lr41414/Wrgi JUL, 10 1990 cITY OF KWILA E_ PLAN DEPT Date: Jh L4 10) 1`l°l0 Project No.: 'tool. 6Z Re: 41249- 1 tS !z' &, s ,&A7 k?. 1 1 Cm % CtEK -CAST 1 On' f ( p►aAUt1StS ( C ,cj SW/ Ff-V SAA) qt lOO By: MZ.P 1 u,/F-Pg4"6"T5O cc: 1 c 1925 Post Alley Seattle, WA 98101 206/441 -3066 i • WWashington State r Department of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007 -6538 (206) 562 -4000 Mr. Vernon M. Umetsu City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Umetsu: TiVA JUN 18 1990 C`a Y ur: Z-u¢:�;Vi�A ?�G Li�.PT • e Berentson ry of Transportation June 13, 1990 SR 99 MP 21.10 CS 173200 Traffic study comments for Larry's Supermarket King Co. File No. 220 -89 -R This letter is in response to traffic study and site plan that we received from Supermarket Development Corporation. The proposed development, located at the southwest corner of the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection, is for the construction of a 60,000 sq. ft. supermarket retail facility with associated parking on a total of 5 acres. The anticipated date of completion and full occupancy is 1991. The development is projected to .produce a total of 7530 daily trips with 529 peak hour trips. In a June 11, 1990 phone conversation with Mr. Hal Eden of Carlson /Ferrin Architects, it is the Department of Transportation's understanding that the developer is delaying this project until this area of. King County is officially annexed into the City of Tukwila. This action is expected to take place in September of 1990. Therefore, the following comments on the traffic study and site plan assume that the development is in the City of Tukwila. (1) The AM peak period was not included in the analysis. Since certain movement volumes may be more critical during this peak, both peak periods should be included in the analysis. (2) Pass by trips are estimated to make up 44% of the driveway trips. The Trip Generation Manual does not list a pass by trip percentage for supermarkets in Table V -5. ,The pass by percentage for shopping centers is not applicable for supermarkets. Additional published justification must be submitted for our review before we will accept a pass by percentage for trip reduction. • • June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Page 2 (3) Diverted trips are estimated to make up 40% of the driveway trips. The Trip Generation Manual does not identify a procedure for estimating the percentage of diverted trips for any land use. These trips should be included in the new trip volumes at all impacted intersections. (4) The Department would model the two way left turn lane ( TWLTL) for LOS calculations for the left turn movements from the development by reducing the conflicting northbound traffic volume. In general, the reduction in volumes for a TWLTL as described above is greatest when the speed limit is between 25 and 35 mph. (5) With the speed limit at 45 mph, we would normally not allow a reduction in the northbound volumes greater than 50 %. At this site, the TWLTL terminates approximately 40 feet north of the proposed access. We do not believe left turning vehicles will use the TWLTL as a refuge in this situation, therefore, no reduction in the conflicting northbound volume is appropriate. The subject study used a 100% reduction of northbound in calculating the LOS of D at the SR 99 site access. Our preliminary analysis of this location using no reduction results in an LOS of E. We recommend that the SR 99 access be limited to right -in /right -out movements only. We also recommend that the access throat be delineated by curbing for a minimum of 50 feet back from the driveway stopbar to eliminate traffic conflicts as vehicles enter and exit SR 99. For the city's information, attached is a copy of a detail that WSDOT District 1 uses for right in /right out driveways. Due to the factors listed above, the trip distribution and LOS should be recalculated at all the previously analyzed intersections. (6) The SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection was identified as having a relatively high accident rate, however, not so high as to require any mitigation. We disagree. This location is within a 1990 Hazardous Accident Location as identified by WSDOT which ranks 11th out of the 215 identified locations. Four pedestrian accidents occurred at this intersection during a recent three year analysis period. The subject development will increase pedestrian travel through the intersection. We recommend improvements to pedestrian facilities at the intersection be part of the off site mitigation for this project. June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umatsu Page 3 (7) In addition, the 1991 LOS is predicted to be D without the development and E with the development. Limiting the SR 99 site access to right -in /right -out will likely further degrade the operation of this intersection. For the above listed reasons, we recommend that the development propose mitigation at the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection that would improve safety and maintain the existing LOS D. In order to help mitigate the traffic impacts generated by the commercial development of the site, we recommend the city impose upon the developer the requirements of the SR 99 route continuity plan. This plan specifies a 7 -lane roadway design with a 13 foot wide two -way left turn lane. This plan has an alternative based on recommendations from a recent Puget Sound Council of Governments study. The outside lanes would be used exclusively for HOV (high occupancy vehicle) purposes. Also, a median barrier down the center of SR 99 is proposed in the future to restrict left turn movements on and off the highway. We do not know when or if these recommendations will be implemented on SR 99. In the meantime, frontage improvements include construction of cement concrete curb, gutter and 5 foot sidewalk along the site's entire SR 99 frontage together with the associated roadway widening and enclosed drainage system. The front face of the curb should be located approximately 42.5 feet from the SR 99 centerline. (8) Mr. Doug Johnson of METRO (684 -1597) has requested through King County (see enclosed letter) that an existing bus zone adjacent to the supermarket property be upgraded. This will need to be coordinated with METRO and Mr. Gene Holeman of WSDOT Traffic Operations at 562 -4248. If any of the proposed bus shelter is within WSDOT right of way, an air space lease will be needed. Ms. Pat Sautter should be contacted at 562- 4383 if an air space lease is necessary. June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Page 4 (9) For any changes to channelization on SR 99, a full size channelization plan must be submitted for review and approval. The channelization plan should be a minimum scale of 1 " =50'; showing both sides of the highway or the entire intersection (whichever is applicable), while including lane widths, tapers, pavement markings, lane markers, existing accesses, and stationing of all breaks in continuity. Terminology stated in the State Standard Specifications should be used when referring to pavement markings and lane markers. Enclosed' is a copy of a WSDOT District 1 "Checklist for Channelization Plans" to help in the preparation of the plans. (10) The traffic analysis should be stamped and signed by a licensed PE familiar with traffic engineering. Once we have received the above requested information, we will finalize our comments. In the meantime, should you have any technical questions concerning comments 2 -4, please feel free to call Eric Bonn of our Traffic Analysis section at 562 -4236. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562 -4274) or Robert Eichelsdoerfer (562 -4297) of my Developer Services section. Sinc ely, RTE:rte ES L. LUTZ, P ilities / Developer ervices Engineer cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Ron Cameron, City of Tukwila Paulette Norman, K.C. Dept. of Public Works Barbara Questad, King County SEPA Center Doug Johnson, METRO Larry McKinney Hal Eden, Carlson /Ferrin Architects Erin Bard, The Transpo Group Encl. CIMETRO • Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 March 16, 1990 ECE1VED MAR ? 01990 Ms. Barbara Questad King County Building and Land Development Division S.E.P.A. Center 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 -1400 WSDOT DIST 1 UTILITIES Re: Supermarket Development Corporation Project Proposal -. South 144th Street & Pacific Highway South Dear Ms. Questad: It is my understanding that the Supermarket Development Corporation is submitting a project proposal for the property located at South 144 Street and Pacific Highway South. Metro Transit maintains a bus zone adjacent to this property on Pacific Highway South about 120 feet south of South 144th Street. I would like to request that certain improvements to this bus stop be incorporated into the Supermarket Development Corporation project. I am specifically interested in the addition of a concrete .footing for a Metro passenger waiting shelter. This footing would be about 5 feet x 10 feet and could be located behind the new 5 foot concrete sidewalk that the State Department of Transportation will probably require here. If this concrete footing is constructed, Metro will provide the shelter and assume all responsibility for its repair and maintenance. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at 684 -1597. Thank you. Sincerely, Doug Johnson Transit Planner DJ: jt cc: Robert Eichelsdoerser, Washington State Department of Transportation Stan Love, Supermarket Development Corporation WSOOT DISTRICT 1 EXTEND CURB 10 FT. MIN. BEYOND POINT OF TANGENCY OF CURB RETURN NOTE: IF CURB EXTENDS GREATER THAN 50' BEYOND POINT OF TANGENCY OF CURB RETURN INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL R3 -5. TYPE 2R ARROW (HOT PLASTIC) R3-5 APPROACH EDGE OF TFRU LANE THRV LANE SLOP DOUBLE YELLOW 50' MN DESIRABLE t 2Z MAX" CENTER STRIPE TYPE 1 ARROW (HOT PLASTIC) =er • DIFFERENCE FROM THRV LANE SLOPE PROFLE CONTROLS -APPROACH TYPE C-I,C -2 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CURB RAMP PER STD PLAN F -6 R=2.5' % 12' SHY EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE 85 °— 95° STATE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL APPROACH - SINGLE APPROACH TYPE G -1 TYPICAL RIGHT IN /OUT ONLY ACCESS FOR CURB LANE DESIGN • } T7 M op • 77? /vs �� Did( (Ai c Nl /\( S 4- Je c ? a % _G �_U 7-- n( ° -- / )) !( S w ( c,if - -- SP A! -�= (_e.S_ _SC o e6" 0 F -- (p_e-rc,t.j f 1> 1 -Try o A[ $ S -� -� -� C. - A-f P- 2.€--s -� c v k F E D Z 1 5-c,j - ?-7_G47-"co - ---- -�-t — — 6,)(c, SUE/14(7- nl c CifiCCCS ors &PPc(c - Y/c,cT y 0P 1</ffc Nile- Li i r ui-jewiLa $RE- APPLICATIiSN CHECKLIST PROJECT: LARRYS MARKET DATE. JUNE 28, 1990 TIME* 2:3° SITE ADDRESS' S144TH /.146TH /PACIFIC HY S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals Center. Channelization /Striping /Signing A Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk v Excavation (public) Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) Flood Zone Control Hauling (2,000 Bond, Cert. Ins.) 2L Landscape Irrigation Moving an Oversized Load [_ Sanitary Side Sewer VALyUE through the City's Permit Center :. ' Sewer Main Extension (private) 1 7- Sewer Main Extension (public) VAL' Vu[ Storm Drainage 1 Water Main Extension (private) Water Main Extension (public) Water Meter (exempt) s. Water Meter (permanent) ? Water Meter (temporary) Other 61kots cyFtLL ® 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). w011 IaS° 3. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center.for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 4. Water and sewer assements may apply and will be determined during the utility plan review, (Z process. t # !1 m LJ 0 /as VAL u sl=to L1\ Ptsil1t"c:r) 5. Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1233, or obtain waiver.) � Hfdro1 iicat]u eot� . (Kl►.4 ck)ut tr'-� 1`•190 D\Stl».� ImAm)1 s'1ktv011R: 6. Provide Hydrological- Geotechnical analys s. SOILS 14190(\1- .1111 "L kcc,uMPAN'/ A -PP'At 1Cr+. 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of grading /fill permit application.. \O Q�rlt"(' 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVO datum and recognized bench marks). 9. Provide traffic analysis /trip generation study for Wit= AITAchtn (0 /a$ /90 ML -`11.c, 10. Provide developers agreement for D1-Pr OS or-, Uu i _o v / C.i 's ReV(IAt.,/p fl, 11. Provi.43,UL w �"it\FEtc S'Ru -j o owin. easements and maintenance agreements �. 1 I L1 S, (it 1,1= n Til (ft 1 -w L) So L i i - `DLP LNO.S -nk i+1r l= t ( VIVO O t- "Lil -Pn ►..t lJry Or f/1.,/)Z "121v,N11.0s 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your deve- lopment. 13. Obtain Metro Waste Discharge permit or approval (684 - 2300). 14. Complete Industrial Waste Survey and return to Metro (self addressed and stamp provided). 15. Review the following City Studies plan. submittal: Fp v\ir when designing C your project and pre.aring your STC)r�„ oa>�Ir.,AC� �� F tJNFt,nCth A, D. s oft cc w\►cf� 'Q' bu1-y A ?Le ATLANIALS DrLLu■1n -- SC)AL S /$1briCTAATIQ'N SYS TUI UCJ(1�,). �.LL 5'"1Ru (\Nu,fki "fib (St 14-tMOUCD /A13n7�Ou•Aer) s t- i-q(A. is t'nr�.rr�► -�r. Iry n S • b ,S ■Q 20. k"Tuk tI(r- M,oVCY^!\lVC1--'� JChecklist prepared by (staff): inn -°fit 1t+••d �Nv 'Cb\fFIG" - Date W-28/9'' 9' �If you should have any questions regarding the permit process forms and handouts, contact th'e Permit Center at 433 -1851. 4REAPP5, 1/90) or would like to obtain additional C a' F - i4FFit 1bD1 PiTIMIuii) L-1 'P\n 1(A ¶V 10 t L-1- RN-) $ 04191.-- 1 PYIA\ k2/.q( S. (9 b �-- PL� w VI'UL WV-91 - >M I �- TUtst) v kl\. vl co wr P (moo 2 j�. s-, I Lit, / 9c/ - G 4--v) T:NAT-1-1-z--ND S*, j l,( L-( L Lr w\ i TTS Rtpz - v - /')7)121 Tl l_ 11l c � I- 1 1 rv\ p vv \„21 o`er S . (Lilt 4-:\,/ TA t"1 I/ 6 r 71-d k 77 4 „.-- - 7- 1/\^-^z5J- . (Li c.,14 — w\-a v c-it,"S n UFO S/I �'' J !AAP s -V-D o &L, P� Cow N0 PA07-Hrr- /C f-ba / /1,trur cc (7_ / (\I 0 S. L, b l=— /37/94-/ fi -� • City of TUktM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTtiEN1 6300 5oulhcenter Tukwila. (206) 433 -0179 Ross A. E:,_i.n t, P.E. MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Cameron FROM: " Phil Fraser DATE: ' 6/28/90 SUBJECT': Larry's Market Trip Generation /Distribution study for Larry's Market shall be provided to assist Public Works Engineering in the determination of impacts /mitigation requirements for the proposed development. This generation /distribution study shall provide for peak periods A.M., Noon, P.M. and AWDT, for the following: 1. Existing conditions 2. Phase I Larry's Market (proposal) 3. Phase II Larry's Market Redevelopment Volumes (existing and development) to be shown on standard ITE diagram format. LOS (for 1, 2 & 3 above) 1. S. 144th Street /Pacific Highway South 2. Pacific Highway South /Mid -block access 3. S. 146th Street /Pacific Highway South 4. S. 152nd Street /Pacific Highway South 5. Others identified by WSDOT (SR99) SAFETY /OTHER 1. Safety (pedestrians particularly) on S. 144th Street from Pacific Highway South to Military road - identify pedestrian volumes and pedestrian crossing issues on S. 144th Street Pacific Highway frontal improvements: a. Construct = 7 lanes with 8 ft. sidewalk if there are safety or capacity issues and an LID process is not being seriously considered by Tukwila. b. If pedestrian vehicle traffic determined to be recently safe and LID process is adopted by Tukwila, then development participates in no protest LID. S. 144th Street Improvements as determined by Traffic Study xc. Development File: Larry's Market PF /pf:arline Fire District # 2 FIRE DISTRICT RECEIP. Name of Project/Proposal- New Supermarket Location of Project /Proposal: SW C 144th St . and Pacific Hwy So ( Riverton Height (Address, cross streets, tax account number, legal description) SEC TWN RNG. Name of Applicant: KROLL PAGE Supermarket Development Corp. (Harold & Dorothy Wynn) Contact: Stan Love Address of Applicant: 10700 Meridian Ave. N. #406 Phone # 365 -9190 DESCRIPTION: TYPE OF PROJECT /PROPOSAL Check Appropriate Box(es) ❑ Apartment /Multifamily ❑ Commercial /Industrial ® Retail ❑ Residential: Single Family Residence ❑ Duplex ❑ Subdivision ® Rezone ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Unclassified Use ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Others: Describe Plot plans only Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project/proposal. This receipt shalt be valid for 30 days from date of signature. K.C.F.D.# 2 Agency Name Inspector Title Distribution: White: Applicant Yellow: King Co. BALD Pink: Fire District Neil T. Hayes Signatory Name Fire Dist: Mail BALD Copy To: King County Bldg. & Land Develp. 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 Attn: Permit Processing Note: APPLICANT: AT TIME OF APPLICATION TO BUILDING & LAND DEVELOPMENT, THE WHITE COPY MUST BE PRESENTED WITH PROJECT /PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL. Date • • (' 1 :. (l ill/ ... 1 ' —CI King County Building & Land Development Division Parks, Planning and Resources Department 3600. 136th Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 980064400 May 3, 1990 Mr. F.Stanton Love Supermarket Development Corp., 10700 Meridian Avenue North, Suite 406 Seattle, WA 98133 -9190 RE: 220 -89 -R - Ordinance 9400 Dear Mr. Love: The King County Council has enacted the attached ordinance granting a change of zoning from RM 900 to CG -P subject to pre and post- effective conditions. Ordinance 9400 will not become effective until the pre- effective conditions of the or- dinance are satisfied. All authority pursuant to such ordinance shall expire if any said conditions are not satisfied within the designated time period and the property shall con- tinue to subject to all laws, regulations and zoning as if the ordinance had not been ap- proved. Pre - effective conditions must be satisfied by April 2, 1991. Please advise this office of the fact that you have deeded the necessary property for the required right -of -way by sending us a copy of the signed deed. The Council may extend the period for satisfaction of said conditions if after a public hearing by the examiner the Council finds an extension will be in the public interest and the extension was requested by the applicant within the initial time period. (KCC 20.24.230) Post - effective conditions as contained in the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner's report must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit by this Division. Sincerely, 7C Gera 1 W. Marbett, Manager Land Use Controls Section GWM :tss Attachment • • King county. Building & Land Development Division Parks, Planning and Resources Department 31100. 1361h Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006.1400 May 3, 1990 TO: Pearl McElheran, Manager Real Property Division FM: Gerald W. Marbett, Manager Land Use Controls Section RE: Right -of-Way Division File 220 -89 -R (Harold Wynn, et al) The attached vicinity map(s) show the recent classification of property in King County. The applicant(s) listed below have been required to deed certain property to King County for additional right -of -way as a condition of approval of the reclassification. We would appreciate your drawing up the necessary deeds for the right -of -way and notifying us when they have been recorded. GWM:tss F. Stanton Love Supermarket Development 10700 Meridian Avenue North, Suite 406 Seattle, WA 98133 -9190 Attachments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1,114E Li..) 1011 1! March 29, 199• Inluced by Lois North 4206D/22 Proposed No. 90 -58 ORDINANCE NO. 9 4 00 AN ORDINANCE concurring with the recommendation of the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner, amending King County Zoning Resolution No, 25789, as amended, by reclassifying certain property upon the application of HAROLD WYNN, ET AL, designated Building and Land Development Pile No. 220 -89 -R. d 141-1.1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OP KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. This ordinance adopts and incorporates the findings and conclusions of the March 14, 1990 report of the zoning and subdivision examiner, filed with the clerk of the council on March 29, 1990 on the application of Harold Wynn, et al to reclassify certain property described building and land development file no. 220 -89 -R. SECTION 2, The recommendation of the zoning and subdivision in examiner to reclassify the subject.property from M -900 to CG -P, subject to conditions (modified) is hereby adopted by the council of King County. Those conditions, 16 if any, which must be satisfied before this ordinance becomes effective must • be satisfied within one year of council approval, or all authority granted by this ordinance shall expire and this ordinance shall be of no further force or effect. (If none, the effective date shall be ten days after enactment.) Upon this ordinance becoming effective, the building and land development division shall amend the official zoning maps of King County to reflect this action. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this 9.11411 day 24 of TaVIA4-124 G/ , 19 90 25 . PASSED this day of 7r,' / , 19 9Q 7 26 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 27 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 28 29 3U ATTF T; 31 Clerk of the Council 32 33 Chair • March 14, 1990 OFFICE OF THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON '`REPORT'AND.RECOMMENDATION TO THE KING COUNTY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: Building and Land Development File No. 220 -89 -P. ;�_ :_P,roposed Ordinance No. 90 -58 • HAROLD WYNN,'ET AL M -900 to CG 20,166 square feet located on the northwest corner of South 146th and Pacific Highway South, approximately 189 feet west of Pacific Highway South. ! . SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: Division's Preliminary: Division's ,Final: Examiner:., II ! r': J PRELIMINARY REPORT: Approve subject to conditions Approve subject to conditions (modified) Approve subject to conditions (modified) The.Building and Land Development Division's Preliminary Report,,on;Item No. 220 -89 -R was received by the,•Examiner on January 23, 1990. PUBLIC HEARING:.;i, After reviewing the.Building and Land Development Division's Report, examining available information on file with the, application and visiting the property and ''�r' surrounding area, the +Examiner conducted'a'public hearing onthe subject.as.follows: The hearing on Item No. 220 -89 -R was opened by the Examiner at 9:20 a..m.,.February 8.,. -1.990, in Room No. 2,' King County Building and ,Land Development, Division, 3600 - 136th Place Southeast, .Bellevue,-Washington; and closed at 11:15 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and the' exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes.` A verbatim recording. .of the. hearing is available in` the office of the • Zoning and, Su,bdivision,.Examiner.-. " • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record.in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following, FINDINGS: 1. General Information: STR:. 22 -23 -4 Location: Existing Zone: Requested,: Zone: Size: File No. 220 -89 -R PAGE 2 Northwest corner of South 146th Street and Pacific Highway South, approximately 189 feet west of Pacific Highway South. RM -900 CG 20,166 square feet 1. The applicant seeks to reclassify a 20,'166 square foot parcel from RM 900 to CG in order to accomodate a portion of a proposed grocery store development. The proposed 55,000 to 60,000 square foot grocery store project site comprises approximately 4.9 acres. 2. The Division recommends approval subject to frontage right- of- way :dedication.to South 146th Street and six additional post-effective conditions. The applicant does not object to those conditions and, in fact, has substantially complied with them or has demonstrated ability /intent to comply with them. 3. An environmental impact statement is not required. See Section D, page 3, preliminary report to the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner, dated February 8, 1990 (Exhibit. No. 1) and the Division's determination of non - significance, (MDNS) dated October 31, 1989 (attachment no. 1 of Exhibit No. 1). The October 31, 1989 MDNS requires that the following documents shall be provided to the Building and Land Development Division as a condition of development approval: A. A copy of -the Notice of Intent, filed with the Air Pollution Control Agency, to remove asbestos from existing building, B. A report reviewing information about the neighboring,; Exxon station, including the possibility''of ' contamination and the need for subsurface exploration and chemical testing (if available from Exxon) C. A report detailing whether possibly contaminated soils were found during site grading. If such soils are found, provide results of test reports and information about proper disposal of contaminated soil; D. A „copy,of notification to Washington State Department, of Ecology for removal of underground storage tanks. Remov,e,and close old underground storage tanks and any connecting piping in with Federal regulations (40 CFR, parts 280 and 281). Notify WSDOE 30 days priorito closure. Coordinate testing for soil and ground water contamination and subsequent remediation plans with Joe Hickey, WSDOE, Northwest Regional Office. The MDNS,further notes that additional SEPA review will,be, required at the time of building permit application for the purpose of reviewing traffic and drainage. No party or agency appealed or objected to the Division's SEPA determination. 4. A neighboring homeowner and purchaser of a neighboring .triplex expresses concern regarding required improvements to South 146th Street, building setbacks and landscaping. KCC 21.51.030.A.6 will require a 10 foot wide Type I landscape strip. The Type I landscape standard is the File No. 220 -89 -R PAGE 3 most intense, view obscuring standard contained in KCC 21.51. The street frontage along Pacific Highway South will require Type III landscaping. However, that portion of the project is not. within the 20,166. square foot subjectproperty. The same neighboring property owner expresses concern regarding potential lighting impacts on neighboring .1., 'residential properties. The applicant agrees to prepare a 'lighting plan which controls light-standard heights, deflection direction, and intensity. 5. The subject property is designated "highway oriented commercial' by the Highline Community Plan land use map. The subject property is located within an Urban Activity Center." The subject property is bounded on the north and east boundaries by CG classified property which comprises the remaining portion of the supermarket proposal. 6. Except as noted above, the facts, analysis and recommendation presented.in the Division of Building and Land Development Preliminary Report dated February 8, 1990 (published January 23, 1990) are accurate and they are incorporated here by reference. A copy of the Division of Building and Land Development report will be attached to the copies of the examiner's report which are submitted to 'the King County Council. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The.MDNS 'controls,regarding• hazardous materials are necessary and appropriate., Further, the'record reflects sufficient assurance that either; the applicant or Exxon Corporation will fully comply with the necessary controls. 2. Traffic impacts canbe,addressed as a condition of site plan approval. 3. Comprehensive Plan Policies CI -215, CI -216, and F -211, as well as Highline Community Plan Policy H -33, can be implemented through site plan review. 4. 'The requested relcassification is consistent with both the ;King County Comprehensive Plan and the Highline Community Plan. These plans encourage intense commercial uses within designated business areas. Approval'of this requested reclassification will result in more logical CG boundaries. 5. The Highline Community Plan land use. map designation for this property is inconsistent with the actual zoning on the property.' The Building and Land Development Division's conclusion - -that the request fulfills the intent of KCC 20.24.190.8 because the community plan land use designation implies either outright zoning to implement the land use designation or the presence of a 'potential designation - -is,a correct conclusion. In this particular case,.the community plan designation accompanied by a zone which does not implement that 'designation clearly implies that a reclassification is necessary po implement the plan, thereby specifically fulfilling the intent of KCC 20.24.190.8.' Because the subject property was not specifically considered when the Highline Community Plan area zoning 'was adopted, KCC 20.24.190.0 also has been met. RECOMMENDATION:: File No. 220 -89 -R PAGE 4 APPROVE CG -P:. with the following pre- effective and post - effective conditions: A. . Pre - effective condition'of'approval. . The applicant shall dedicate 8 feet of "right -of -way along the•South.'146th-Street frontage of the subject property. This pre-effective' condition of approval shall be fulfilled within one year following council approval of this report. • Post - effective condition of approval. Compliance with the following post- effective conditions of appro.val;shall-be assured through site plan review and approval as provided by KCC 21.46.150 through- -.200. 1. The applicant shall provide an outdoor lighting plan which limits light standards to no more than •1'8 feet high within 100 feet from any residentially classified property boundary; and which assures through proper light intensity, proper deflection, and other reasonable. controls, < that lighting impacts on neighboring residentially classified properties will be minimized. As an alternative to the lighting plan and analysis, the applicant may install only bollard :style light fixtures no more than 4 feet high 'within parking areas located within 100 feet from ,any residentially classified property. 2. No lighted signs shall directly face any ,residentially classified property. 3. The required site plan approval shall assure comformance with Comprehensive Plan Policies .CI -215, CI -216, and F -211. 4. The required site plan approval shall assure conformance with Highline Community Plan Policy H -33. 5. -Landscaping required by KCC 21.51 and KCCP Policy .,CI -215 shall not be reduced (as could otherwise be permitted pursuant to KCC 21.51.050) along South 146th Street or along any boundary in common with residentially classified property. Street trees shall be installed to the maximum .•extent reasonably feasible, except where. necessary to protect entering sight distance. Landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy permit issuance. The applicant shall post -a, bond which assures proper landscaping maintenance for a period not less than three years. The.bond _shall guarantee, at a minimum, compliance with the highest applicable KCC 21.51 and KCCP Policy ; CI -215 standards and shall guarantee that dead, diseased, stolen or vandalized plantings shall be -.replaced within 'three months, that the planting areas shall be maintained reasonably free of weeds and trash, and that the landscaping will be maintained properly with respect to pruning, trimming, watering and other measures necessary to create an attractive appearance and a healthy growing condition. • • File No. 220 -89 -R PAGE 5 All landscaped areas required by this condition of reclassification approval shall be planted in good soil (imported to the site if necessary) consistent with accepted nursery practices. A permanent water source shall be installed 'within 75 feet from all required landscaped areas. Any wall facing South 146th Street residentially classified ha facing any painted,in soft earth tones. Bright, be luminescent, garish or distinctly non - residential colors are specifically prohibited. Site plan review and approval shall assure compliance with other applicable County standards, such as those standards which apply to access, parking, internal circulation, fire, the various building, plumbing, electrical, and related codes, drainage, and traffic impacts. ,In particular, the development proposed for site -plan approval shall be assessed to determine appropriate mitigating drainage and traffic impact measures and controls. See also Condition No. 10, below. 8. A solid wood view obscuring fence, designed and constructed to assure residential esthetic compatibility, as well as long term durability, shallbe constructed along any boundary in common with residentially classified property. 9. The South 146th Street frontage of the subject property shall be improved.to applicable urban King County Road Standards KCRS 1987 (to the west boundary of the subject property). 10. The applicant shall prepare a traffic study to determine if 10 or more peak hour trips_(A.M. or P.M.) will travel through a single state intersection, as required by Washington State 'Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The study shall be reviewed by WSDOT and King County ''Traffic Planning, and mitigation imposed, if required, based on WSDOT's.recommendations. 11. A copy of the Notice of .Intent to remove asbestos from the existing building shall be filed with Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. 12. A report reviewing information about the neighboring Exxon station, including the possibility of contamination and the need for subsurface exploration and chemical testing (if available from Exxon) shall be reviewed by the Building and Land Development Division Technical Services ,Section, with appropriate mitigating measures imposed as circumstances warrant. This condition can be deferred to Exxon Corporation at the time of lot line adjustment between the two properties if executed. 13.''A report stating whether possibly contaminated soils were found during site grading shall be presented. If such soils are found, the applicant shall provide results of test reports and'information about proper disposal'of excavated contaminated soil, That report' shall • • File No. 220 -89 -R PACE 6 be reviewed by the Building and Land Development Division Technical Services Section. 14. A. copy of notification to Washington State :Department of Ecology (WSDOE) for removal of -; underground storage tanks (USTs) shall be provided. The applicant shall remove and close old USTs'and any connecting piping in compliance with Federal regulations (40 CFR, parts 280 and .;281). The applicant shall notify WSDOE 30 days prior to closure and shall coordinate testing for soil and ground water contamination and subsequent remediation plans with the Northwest r Regional Office of WSDOE. ORDERED. this 14th day of March, 1990. Robert .. >:tanl` -y itus Depu ti' Zoning and Subdivision Ex -..:' n e r TRANSMITTED this 14th day of March, 1990, by certified mail, to the following, parties of record: Supermarket Dev. Corp. /F. Stanton Love Harold Wynn, et al Johann Pollinger J. Marcy V. Earline Jones , Wm. L. Kelley Steven Korito TRANSMITTED this 14th day of March, 1990, to the following: Paulette Norman, Building and Land Development Division Dave Baugh,Building'and Land'Development.Division Heide Koch,,Building and Land Development Division Carol Chan, Community Planning Craig Larsen, Community Planning Wally Swofford, K.' C. Health Department WA State Dept.. 'of Ecology ' ' METRO, Gregory Bush WA State Dept. of Transp., James L. Lutz NOTICE'OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the recommendation of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of 70.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance)' on or before March 28, 1990. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and 6 copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument: in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the:King County Council on or before April 4,_1990. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within;l4.calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement-and argument are not filed within 21 calendar days.of -the date of this report, the Clerk of the • • File No. 220 -89 -R PAGE 7 Council shall place a proposed ordinance which implements the Examiner's recommended action on the agenda of the next available Council meeting. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 403, King County Courthouse, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. Action of the Council Final. The action of the Council approving or adopting a recommendation of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within twenty (20) days from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person applies for a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court in and for the County of King, State of Washington, for the purpose of review of the action taken. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 8, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING ON BALF FILE NO. 220 -89 -R - HAROLD WYNN, ET AL. Robert Stanley Titus was the.hearing examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing was Dave Baugh, representing Building and Land Development Division, F. Stanton Love and William L. Kelley. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Building and Land Development Division staff report, dated 2/8/90 No. 2 Rezone application, dated 9/15/89 No. 3 Environmental checklist No. 4 Determintion of non - significance, dated 10/31/89 No. 5 Site plan P6 No. 6 Assessor's map NW 22 -23 -4 No. 7 Affadavit of publication, dated 1/10/90 No. 8 Affadavit of posting dated 10/31/89; 10/21/89 No. 9 Topographic survey map, dated 9/15/89 No. 10 Supplemental environmental assessment, dated 9/27/89 No. 11 Letter from Stanton Love, dated 9/25/89 No. 12 Memo from Steve Bottheim, dated 10/24/89 No. 13 Memo from Paulette Norman, dated 10/17/89 No. 14 Submitted conditions 7 and 8 4616D /RST /sm • • Kin County Building dk land Development Division Parks, Planning and Resources Department 3600. 136th Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 980061400 TO THE APPLICANT: RE: APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION The information sought herein is necessary to evaluate the merits of your zone reclassification request and to assess the environmental impact. The environmental checklist will be the basis for determining if an environmental impact statement will be required prior to any approval of the request pursuant to the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW. You should fully inform yourself of the uses and building limitations of the zone you request in order to assure that the development you intend will be feasible within the classification. Your application will be evaluated on the basis of the information you provide, the King County Comprehensive Plan, pertinent provisions of the King County Code, testimony and evidence presented by interest- ed public agencies. Copies of the King County Comprehensive Plan and the King County Zoning Code are available for inpsection at our public counter, at the Main Branch of the Seattle Public Library and at the Governmental Research Assistance Library, 307 Municipal Building, Seattle. F -215 Page 1 of 8 • • King County Budding & Land Development Division Parks. Planning and Resources Department 3600.136th Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 880004400 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION: Prior to filing a zone reclassification application, the proposal should be discussed with Staff of Building and Land Development Division. Site plans may be required as a part of your application. See Item #7 of Application Documents, on page 3 of these instructions. FILING OF APPLICATION: Applications must be filed in order in the Building and Land Development Division Office at least 54 days prior to the hearing in which it is con- sidered. This application must be filed in person, not by mail. A filing fee is required, amount for which will be determined at the time of filing based on the adopted fee schedule. If payment is by check, it should be made out to the King County Office of Finance. HEARING: A public hearing will be held by the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner for the King County Council at which evidence supporting or against the proposal will be heard. There is a limitation on the number of applications which are accepted for each hearing. All applications received after the maximum number has been reached will be considered at the following month's hearing. REPORTS & RECORDS: Staff reports shall be available for public inspections two weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Files and pertinent records are available up to the date of public hearing. APPLICATION DISCUSSION: Parties for or against an application may discuss the matter with Build- ing and Land Development staff up to the date of public hearing. F -215 'Page 2 of 8 APPLICATION DOCUMENTS 1. APPLICATION FORM - Submit one original/ Fill out this form accurately and neatly. a. If the property involved in the application is made up of more than one parcel with more than one owner involved EACH parcel under separate ownership must be given the number indicated opposite the owner's name and address. b. If the application is on one or more parcels of property with more than one owner, it is not necessary for all owner's names to be notarized. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Submit two copies/ On a separate sheet of white, legal size, 8 1/2" x 14" paper type the legal description of the property for which reclassification is sought and attached to the application. The legal description of your property from the King County Department of Assessments. BE ABSOLUTELY SURE THE DESCRIPTION IS COR- RECT AND AGREES WITH THE PROPERTY OUTLINED ON THE ASSESSOR'S MAP. A current legal description is necessary before the application is acceptable. If the legal description is written from a survey map, that map should accompany the legal description. 3. ASSESSOR'S MAPS - Submit one set/ Submit up -to -date prints of the Assessor's maps, covering the area within the application and all property within 500' of the boundaries of it. Outline subject property in red pencil and give a parcel number to each ownership (see example of map on next page). Prints of these must be ordered from the King County Department of Public Works MAP COUNTER, Room 900. King County Adminis- tration Building, 206) 296 -6548. (DO NOT CUT OR TAPE THE MAPS TOGETHER). 4. APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - Submit 15 copies/ A11 items should be answered or discussed as concisely and candidly as pos- sible. If information requested does not apply to the proposed project, enter "n /a" (not applicable). Additional sheets may be used if desired. The ap- )licant will be contacted by Building and Land Development Staff if additional information or clarity is required; however, failure to respond may cause postponement of consideration of your request. CERTIFICATES OF WATER /SEWER AVAILABILITY - Submit one set/ lie attached forms concerning sewer and water availability to the site must be liven to the appropriate agency to complete (sewer district, water district, :ity, water association, water company) and then return with this application. 'his must be done whether or not public water or sewer service is planner for ;he proposed development. At the top of the form a space' is provided for a lescription of the site of the location of the property. In this space the egal description of the site should be inserted or attached on a separate ;beet if it is too lengthy. If completion of these forms is not possible, ex- 'lain why under questions #20 on the application form. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - f°hotographs, site plans, drawings of.building elevations, topographic maps, Jetitions, sketches, etc., may be submitted to support the application. . REQUIRED SITE PLANS - :f it has been determined by the Staff of this Division that site plans are tecessary, submit six (6) copies with your application. Contents of the plan eed to include the information as outlined in 21.46.200 of the King County oning Code. 0 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR N E. 12 - 2 L - 3 •e .uu r. roe• NOTE: In this example, you would need three other King County Assessor's 1/4 Section Maps in order to identify properties within a 500' radius. - Questions relating to this application process may be answered by calling: Division of Building and Land Development 3600 - 136th Place Southeast, Suite A Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 Telephone 296 -6650 296 -6655 (general information) F -215 2/85 Page 4 Of 8 APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLSSIFICATION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Application Number rec'd date Application Name Hearing Date Zone Exist stamp STR Zone Request Kroll & Book No. Zone Granted Acreage Ordinane # F.H.B. /C.D.A. Ref.File # Sensitive Area: Shorline Desig. Ag. Dist. L.S.A. Comm. Plan Area rea Location: Riverton Heights SWC 144th St. and Pacific Highway 99 South r * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *do not write above this line * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** (we) the undersigned owner(s) of property numbered opposite my (our) name(s) iereby petition for a zone reclassification of property described herein rom RM900 and CG .o CG STATE OF WASHINGTON) 'OUNTY OF KING ) Harold Wynn & :, Dorothy L. Wynn , being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a )roperty owner or officer of the corporation owing property shown on Parcel #1 )n assessor's map and that I have familiarized myself with the rules and !egulations of the Building and Land Development Division with respect to )reparing and filing this application and.that the following statments, .nswers and information submitted presents the argument in behalf of-this ap- +lication and are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge nd belief. 2007 South 112th St. address Seattle, WA 98168 ity state (206) 242 -5657 . telephone r' .not4ry'se1l L ;'her' property owners P1L W ignatu corporation or company name Subscribed and sworn to me thi 14th day ofSept. 19 89 Notary Pub1 State of Washington Y residing at My Commission Expires April 1, 1991. c n d for the Kent, and included in this application must be listed below op- 3site a parcel number which is also shown on the assessor's map and indicates le property owned by each applicant. arce1 ,3 ame address name addroa g City /State Signature City /S Zip Zip Phone Phone :ate below the name, address and phone number of person or perso Icted for further details on this application. Supermarket Development Corporation name (Stan Love) ity/State Seattle, WA 'age 5 of 8 10700 Meridian be con- Ave. No., Suite 406 address Zip 98133 -9014 Phone 365 -9190 • • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION FILE NO. L. Existing Zone: RM900 and CG . Requested Zone: CO 3. Acreage Approx. .69 Acres, Approx. 30,000 6. Sec. -Twp. R: 22-23 -4 Sq. Ft. 1. Water District King Co. #125 7. Sewer District Val Vue 5. Fire District #2 (Burien /Highline) 8. School District Highline S.D. #1401 3. Has an environmental impact statement (EIS) been prepared for the ,roposed development ( ) yes ( ) no. If yes, submit the environmental ;hecklist form. If no, do you believe an EIS should be prepared on his proposal? .0. List all buildings and land uses which are present on the property. Mobile home refurbishment business .1. Describe existing land uses on adjoining properties. Mobile home park, apartment complexes, A &W Drive -In restaurant, recretional vehicle sales and repair service, multi - family residential, Exxon service station on corner. .2. What is the proposed use of the property under the requested zone? Construction of a supermarket facility and parking lot. .3. Have you made this request or your planned development known to .nterested community groups or neighboring property owners? ( ) yea :x) no. If yes, who have you notified and what were their reactions? A. What effect will the proposed zoning and contemplated use of the subject property have on adjoining or neighboring properties? 1) Convenient shopping and related supermarket services. 2) Removal of unsightly debris and temporary structures. ? -215 ?age 6 of 8 • • L5. How can the uses permitted within the proposed zone be made compatible pith uses permitted on abutting property or dissimilar zoning? Most of the adjacent property is currently zoned CG. The proposal is an extension of the CG zoning that permits the positioning of a supermarket to best utilize parking space. Landscaping as a screen would help mitigate the proposed supermarket operation from the residents to the west. 6. Is this a logical expansion of any existing adjacent zone? Yes. The proposed rezone classification merely extends the current CG zoning. 7. To the best of your knowledge, was a reclassification request made on . his property at the time of the -last area zoning or at any other time in the ast? No 48. Since the last previous area zoning of the subject property, have pthorized public improvements, private development or other circumstances aterially or significantely affected the property? ( ) yes (X) no If yes, hat are the changed circumstances and how have they affected the property? 9. Public roads and /or other means, i.e., easements, by which access would a provided to the site. Direct access from north: 144th Street Direct access from east and south: Pacific Highway 99 South. ). The attached forms concerning.sewer and water availabiity must be com- .eted by the appropriate agency (sewer district, water district, city, water mpany or water association) whether or not public water or sewer service is tanner for the proposed development. If a waste disposal system other than iblic sewers is proposed, explain what type of system will be utilized. If iter service is planned to be provided by some means other than an existing ter purveyor, explain how it will be provided. The supermarket plans to use both city water and sewer systems. What King County Comprehensive Plan and relevant community plan finciples and policies regarding appropriate land use, access, :ilities, etc., support this request? The land use definition of the 1977 Community Plan and the 1981 Area Zoning both recognize the property for the proposed use /project. See site plan for access. Utilities are adequate to support the project. • • 2. You may submit any additional information (sketches, site plans, en- gineering reports, petitins, photographs, etc.) which you believe will jus- :ify, clarify, or will assist in the review of your requested zone re- :lassification. The Building and Land Development Division or the Zoning and subdivision examiner may at any time request further information or studies for these purposes. 1) Preliminary site plan 2) Photographs of existing land use 3) Boundary and topographical survey 3. Should the zone classification you are requesting be different than that hich is shown on the adopted community plan for the area, a response to the allowing criteria of the King County Code (KCC) should be included with your ,ubmittal: :CC 20.24.190. Additional examiner findings - Reclassifications and shoreline •edesignations. When the examiner issues a recommendation regarding an pplication for a reclassification of property or for a shoreline nvironment redesignation, the recommendation shall include additional find - ngs which support the conclusion that at least one of the following cir- umstances applies: The property is potentially zoned for the reclassification bein re q d and conditions have been met which indicates the reclassification is is ap - ropriate; or j.0 An adopted community plan or area zoning specifies that the property hall be subsequently considered through an individual reclassification pplication; or Where a community plan has been adopted but subsequent area zoning has not een adopted, that the proposed reclassification or shoreline redesignation is onsistent with the adopted community plan; or The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: 1. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment.de- ignation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted rivate development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject roperty have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or ontemplated in the current community plan or area zoning. 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect he subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other roperties in the vicinity such that area zoning or redesignation is not ap- ropriate; and 3. The requested reclassification or redesignation is required in he public interest. • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION REZONE PARCEL FROM CURRENT RM -900 AND C -G ZONING TO C -G ZONING THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE WEST 64.4 FEET OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 2 OF ADAMS HOME TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (The intent is to cause the RM -900 zoned rectangular parcel within Lot 28 to be reclassified to C -G, as is the balance of Lot 28). King County executive Jim Hill ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known. or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems. the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- DITION, complete the SCPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D. For nonproject actions. the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant." and "property or site" should be read as "proposal.' "proposer.' and 'affected geographic area." respectively. A. 'BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project. if applicable: New supermarket 2. Name of applicant: Supermarket Development 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact 10700 Meridian Ave. No., Suite 406 Seattle, WA 98133 -9014 4. Date checklist prepared: September 7, 1939 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County Building & Land Development Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): Construction anticipated in spring of 1990 completion anticipated fall of 1990. Corporation (Harold and Dorothy Wynn) person: phone: 206 - 365 -9190 contact: F. Stanton Love 7. Du you have any plans for future additions. expansion. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. No (Ch. 197 -11 RCW -0 l H983 Lawsl • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven -197 -11 -960 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to. -- this proposal. General soils engineering study. Contains site /soils assessment report. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Zoning reclassification of a small portion of site. Standard building /construction permits. 11. Give brief. complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) Retail supermarket facility with landscaped parking lot. Store size will probably be 55,000 - 60,000 sq. ft. Standard truck receiving docks and . enclosed trash compactor /container. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro - posed project. including a street address. if any. and section. township. and range. if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan. vicinity map. and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by' the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Location: Riverton Heights (Sec. 22, Twp. 23, Rge4) SWC 144th St. & Pacific Highway So. Parcel size: approximately 5 acres Facility: to face north with rear of building next to 146th St. Topo survey (attached) shows existing structures. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E' ;LL'ATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) other rolling. hilly. steep slopes. mountainous. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'.' 7% 2 1 I V!f Lµ51 [Ch. I47 -11 RCS'. -p 411 • • -Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, day, sand, gravel. peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sands with varying degrees of gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. no e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of rill. Grading to smooth site, and to reduce slope as needed. Site should require no fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so. generally describe. no g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction 1 for example. asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 90% - 95% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: None should be required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust. automobile. odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'' If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust and vehicle emission standard with construction. b. .Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'.' If so. generally describe. no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: No emissions other than vehicle after project is complete. This is a retail facility. 3 lCh. 197 -11 RCN —A 421 11953 Laws) SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year –round and seasonal streams, saltwater. lakes, ponds. wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription. purpose. and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a I00 –year floodplain' If so. note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface eaters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water.' Give general description. purpose. and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tank; or other sources. if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial. containing the following_ chemicals . . agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system. the number of 'such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None Iois; L.3%•1 (('h. 147-11 R(A1 —Q ; ?) 4 Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT SEPA Rules EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Parking lot run -off anticipated into storm sewer system. System runs north and east through duct and drainage ditches. Eventually runs into Duwamish River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. No waste materials generated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts. if any: Compliance with King Co. Title Code No. 9.04 (Storm Water Control) may require on site (beneath surface) retention tank to control run off rate. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder. maple. aspen. other X_ evergreen tree: fir. cedar. pine. other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup. bullrush. skunk cabbage. other water plants: water lily. eelgrass. milfoiI. other other types of vegetation lots of weeds b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered'' A few trees, some shrubs, many weeds. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping. use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: Perimeter of site and parking lot interior to contain trees, shrubs, sod, and various plants. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None birds: hawk. heron. eagle. songbirds. other: mammals: deer. bear. elk, beaver. other: fish: bass. salmon, trout. herring. shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. tch. 197 -11 RCW —p 441 5 none .1081 9R? Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil. wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing. etc. Electricity and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: Building to comply with energy code regulations. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any:. No health hazards produced b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment. operation. other)? None Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Vehicular traffic generally during morning, day and evening hours. building would also help block street traffic sound from Highway 99) 6 1i9 s3 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (The supermarket (Ch. 197 -11 RCt. —p 451 Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: Block wall along dock to reduce truck sound. Some landscaping to help absorb sound. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Retail. (drive in restaurant, recretional vehicle sales and service, service station, mobile home refurbishment). Residential (multifamily and mobile home park, apartments). b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Older . service facilities, restaurant w /metal canopy, mobile homes, service station. d. Will art) structures be demolished? If so. what? Old service facilities, restaurant. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site'' CG = 86.18% RM900 = 13.82% f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site'' Highway oriented commercial development If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? g. NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project'' 100 -150 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Approximately 10 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: None anticipated. • I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected kind uses and plans. if any: The retail supermarket is compatable with CG zoning. 7 !Ch. t97.11 RCAW ■D 461 l 1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules Part Eleven - 197 -11 -960'• TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low- income housing. NA b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle, or low- income housing. 20 low income housing c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: EVALUATION FOR . AGENCY LSE ONLY New locations have been found for all residents by Central Trailer Exchange (owner of mobile home park). Relocation expenses are being paid by Central Trailer Exchange. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed'' 26 -28 feet Block construction b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: Landscaping perimeter of project and on parking lot. Sod, trees, ground cover and bushes. I I. Light and Glare a. \hat type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? what time of day would it maini> occur? Parking lot light during evening and night hours. b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views'' No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal'' None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: Fixtures designed and installed to minimize if not eliminate glare and upward lateral spread. Focus of light to be on parking lot. 12. Recreation Lt. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational use:'' If so. describe. No 8 1 IJ\ 1 I..,w•l Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NA 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. national, state. or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NA – none b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological. scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NA – none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NA – none 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Paved two lane – 144th Street on north side paved four lane Pacific Highway 99 on east side of site. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop'! No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate' with project :330 spaces before project:40 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing_ roads or streets. not including driveways'' If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air transporta- tion? If so. generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed r ect ' I known. indicate when peak volumes %could occur. Infornntioti from Paulette `Nortttan (Traffic Dept.) Irti 10-it RrA%_p�>,I Estimate 6,500 – 7,u00 trips /day peak volumes. SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: Proposed access points carefully control traffic. Nothing else planned. 15. Public Sera ices a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. •No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ce. ephone sanitary se∎Zer septic system. other. atural ga efuse ser•- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All standard utilities currently available will be used. No special construction activities other than hook –ups to those existing utilities. C. SIGN.ATt.RE 'The above answers are tru the lead agency is relying Signature: Date Submitted: b knowledge. I understand that • dei• 1, (1983 Laws) 1Ch. 197 -11 RCN —p 491 1 1 1 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for 1 LA RR Y'S MARKET #1 RELOCATION i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i Prepared for: Larry's Markets July 9, 1990 Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: 9/7/90 MEMORANDUM ('HONE # 1206) 433 -1800 SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Impacts /Mitigations - Larry's Market #1 Relocation (Transpo 7/9/90 Study) Public Works has reviewed the TRANSPO 7/9/90 report for Larry's Market #1 Relocation at S. 146th /SR -99 and provides the following comments: 1. Fronting the project dedicate 10 L.F. right -of -way South 146th St., 10 ' L.F. right -of -way on South 144th Street and approximately 3 1/2' right -of -way and /or easements for Pacific Highway South to provide a 6' sidewalk, 5' planter strip and 42.5 of roadway on the west side of the Highway 99 centerline. 2. Sign No Protest Agreement LID for: A. Commercial street improvement Pacific Highway South for 84' curb to curb roadway /7 lane configuration, including C /G, sidewalk plant strip, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation /undergrounding, street lighting, signalization, modifications and undergrounding. Development to be given credit for right -of -way donations and frontal improvements which directly meet improvements or right -of -way requirements of Pacific Highway South improvement. B. Undergrounding on S. 144th St. and S. 146th St. 3. Provide frontal improvements on S. 144th St., S. 146th St., and on Pacific Highway South. Improvements to include 6' sidewalks only, street widening, C /G, right -of -way, drainage, utility relocation, street lighting, signalizaion/ modifications and undergounding. Provide off -site pedestrian walkway at: A. S.W. corner Pacific Highway South and S. 144th St. fronting existing Exxon site or cash assignment Gary L. VanDnsen. Alayor (150 %) for improvement prior to CO. B. S. 146th St. from development property line west to Military Road. Walkway shall be minimum 5' beyond edge of roadway, paved - Construct or provide 150% cash assignment (acceptable to City Attorney) prior to occupancy, if allowed by City Engineer. The City will require future South 146th St. Developer's to reimburse Larry's Market for a proportionate share of the pedestrian walkway. The proportionate share will be based on trip generation and for the pedestrian walkway construction costs. 5. Additional traffic analysis /studies will be made to South 146th /Pacific Highway intersection prior to issuance of Building Permit. A. Signal warrant analysis and collision diagram to be used to determine future intersection improvements. Cost of this analysis to be shared by Dondero and Larry's based on their intersection traffic. B. Costs of future intersection improvements con- tribution to be determined by developer traffic divided by 1990 to 2000 traffic increase. 6. Evaluate channelization prior to issuance Permit: A. Pacific Highway South /driveway B. S. 144th /Larry's driveway and K F left turn storage of Building driveway for 7. Evaluation of downstream drainage capacity of runoff from Larry's is being provided (prior to issuance of Building Permit). Full system deficiency identification and correction will be part of the Pacific Highway improvement project (LID) PF /pf:1 PUBLICRWORKS ROUTING SLIP DAarE TO: 7//7 ( )MAYOR (GARY) )CITY ADMINISTRATOR (JOHN) )P . DIRECTOR (ROSS E) ( CITY ENGINEER (RON) )SURF WATER ENGR (PHIL) ( )TRANSP ENGR (BRIAN) ( )CONST ENGR (GREG N) ( )WATER /SEWER ENGR (PAT) ( }ASSOC ENGR (BOB) ( }ASSOC ENGR (ROSS H) ( )INTERN ENGR (MARK) ( )INTERN ENGR (NANCY) ( )INSPECTOR (GREG V) ( )SUPT DIV I (TED) ( )SUPT DIV II (MARV) 1 ( ) ADMIN SECY (CAROL) ( )ADMIN CLERK II (KELCIE) ( )ADMIN CLERK I (ARLINE) ( )P.W. COORDINATOR (DOUG) FROM: COMME_ NTS : 4 • 44,6'0 3 N444e; )4 7/7711 e L 1j _ l �G� 70 RETURN TO: FILE: S!S t fit-4 � t � � OTHER: rrr 0 J NO SCALE LARRY'S MARKET Rose 7 Suggested Geometry S 144th Street � r North The Transpo Gtoup JIJL_ .L r_, '_at_t 44:5r1! I iJ FAX TRANSMITTAL. Date: •960 Transmit To: Borikl Transmitting to Fax Number:1 i i lf; Tmnspo Group FAX Number: 206-747-3688 From d ate-A The TRANSPO Group 14715 Bel -Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 -3940 (206) 641 -3881 / -ids b'9te99.� Number of pages transmitted (include this transmittal in count) : Sending Instructions: i TRANSPO Project Number Ohm- Comments: &AI r>� Sri") t.I I r u1- I UKWILA PREC.APPLICATION CHECKLIST PRE-APPLICATION FILE NO PRE- APP - 018 -90 MEETING DATE`_JUNE 28, 1990 TIME• 2:30 PROJECT: LARRYS MARKET SITE ADDRESS: S144TH /S146TH /PACIFIC HY S PUBLIC WORKS .DEPARTMENT Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals Center: Channelization /Striping /Signing Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk v Excavation (public) k Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) - Flood Zone Control Hauling (2,000 Bond, Cert. Ins.) A_ Landscape Irrigation Moving an Oversized Load [_ Sanitary Side Sewer VALVUe through the City's Permit Center: Sewer Main Extension (private) J Sewer Main Extension (public) Vet. Vila. 5r Storm Drainage Water Main Extension (private) Water Main Extension (public) Water Meter (exempt) w lam A. Water Meter (permanent) Water Meter (temporary) Other GiLAr7t5 s' f j 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). A j 3. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 4. Water and sewer assements may apply and will be determined during process. (Z1- /1 T() 1i 0 # vALvult s Lrt otsit1icy ) 5. 6. Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1233, or obtain D ri -r'. t2 -Dulnc.a .1 Frti ��, CKI►..4- C.aUNi`1 19 0 Provide Hydrological- Geotechnical analysis C SOILS l INE.t4''S R.w o N- sIIfl ■'L A- cc,uMPPN 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of grading /fill permit appli the utility plan review waiver.•) D\-St t MtAlvur. 51A7.30A '-/ APP L1ue“ tow tu', cation �nOt ViLL ) 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVD datum and recognized bench marks). 9. Provide traffic analysis /trip generation study for 10. P.•rovide developers agreement for D P"nS o«, Uuiccw)(L/ C.1-1 '5 R0I('J/pecurv- 11. Provi.- - o own • - asements and maintenance agreements A it -Acr1 M (4,1a8 /c9c' INAt>mo -; 1 L1 c 1 -, 0-11/--1-= `i"r fi1clftc 1 -jii-I 5oL(Ttd DLPON-OS _D p.; - TAIVA =lc ST1_04`/ bL�1v��h.(�Tl•nv or' F!NM. X24 i 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your deve- lopment. 13. Obtain Metro Waste Discharge permit or approval (684 - 2300). 14. Complete Industrial Waste Survey and return to Metro (self addressed and stamp provided). IS. Review the following City Studies when designing your project and pre aring your plan submittal: FPsa+\jr ? CI��vM C'I -rtc. -D14\16.A-tiis° 16. STvILh, DQAINAta 1.1Z -NT is Rt.1mr-b(lct :ra A. p. S oZ c(>t,Acff∎ T1' "PIP1 b��y ATLI° lM►�T1s1\.tAL - c.'ALE5 /1, c7fCTf1iR1(or.i Sy3 RTaNl,ll,itn. ALL h-uc:ittP��:� �' A�P i\tv\L C):S /A13At-, OUr r 5I.1 -Au. Tz� 11 N-r 1t =iC'1� �►v PLANS . ct ci 17 U.,,&"-j �fultrv.(N(r- N. , \ AU. t' 9 u irs1 Iecklist prepared by (staff): "P LV t 1 v., L h or-J i tlAf F I G Date you should have any questions regarding the permit process or would like to obtain additional ;rms and handouts, contact the Permit Center at 433 -1851. REAPP5, 1/90) Sc.��c c, r FAA rt- IL `mil IA 1 ►"i`j1�c'I, tv ,41)24' l , ,G L4, f - e/G LL/ ��� �� ,, • Washington State • Department of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007 -6538 (206) 562 -4000 June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon M. Umetsu City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation SR 99 MP 21.10 CS 173200 Traffic study comments for Larry's Supermarket King Co. File No. 220 -89 -R Dear Mr. Umetsu: This letter is in response to traffic ..study and site plan that we received from Supermarket Development Corporation. The proposed development, located at the southwest corner of the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection, is for the construction of a 60,000 sq. ft. supermarket retail facility with associated parking on a total of 5 acres. The anticipated date of completion and full occupancy is 1991. The development is projected to produce a total of 7530 daily trips with 529 peak hour trips. In a June 11, 1990 phone conversation with Mr. Hal Eden of Carlson /Ferrin Architects, it is the Department of Transportation's understanding that the developer is delaying this project until this area of. King County is officially annexed into the City of Tukwila. This action is expected to take place in September of 1990. Therefore, the following comments on the traffic study and site plan assume that the development is in the City of Tukwila. (1) The AM peak,. period was not included in the analysis. Since erfain movement volumes may be more critical dung"�cthis peak, both peak periods should be included -i-n the analysis. (2) Pass by trips are estimated to make up 44% of the driveway trips. The Trip- Generation Manual does not list a pass by trip-p'ercentage for supermarkets in Table V -5. The pass by percentage for shopping centers is not applica'b1e for supermarkets. Additional published justification must be submitted for our review befote we will accept a pass by percentage for trip reduction. June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Page 2 (3) Diverted trips are estimated to make up 40% of the driveway trips. The Trip Generation Manual does not identify a procedure for estimating the percentage of diverted trips for any land use. These trips should be included in the new trip volumes at all impacted intersections. (4) The Department would model the two way left turn lane (TWLTL) for LOS calculations for the left turn movements from the development by reducing the conflicting northbound traffic volume. In general, the reduction in volumes for a TWLTL as described above is greatest when the speed limit is between 25 and 35 mph. With the speed limit at 45 mph, we would normally not allow a reduction in the northbound volumes greater than 50 %. At this site, the TWLTL terminates approximately 40 feet north of the proposed access. We do not believe left turning vehicles will use the TWLTL as a refuge in this situation, therefore, no reduction in the conflicting northbound volume is appropriate. (5) The subject study used a 100% reduction of northbound in calculating the LOS of D at the SR 99 site access. Our preliminary analysis of this location using no reduction results in an LOS of F. We recommend that the SR 99 access be limited to right -in /right -out movements only. • We also recommend that the access throat be delineated by curbing for a minimum of 50 feet back from the driveway stopbar to eliminate traffic conflicts as vehicles enter and exit SR 99. For the city's information, attached is a copy of a detail that WSDOT District 1 uses for right in /right out driveways. Due to the factors listed above, the trip distribution and LOS should be recalculated at all the previously analyzed intersections. (6) The SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection was identified as having a relatively high accident rate, however, not so high as to require any mitigation. We disagree. This location is within a 1990 Hazardous Accident Location as identified by WSDOT which ranks 11th out of the 215 identified locations. Four pedestrian accidents occurred at this intersection during a recent three year analysis period. The subject development will increase pedestrian travel through the intersection. We recommend improvements to pedestrian aG444t -4es at the intersection be part of the off site mitigation for this project. C�L tort66sS d acs; June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umatsu Page 3 In addition, the 1991 LOS is predicted to be D without the development and E with the development. Limiting the SR 99 site access to right -in /right -out will likely further degrade the operation of this intersection. 'yrvv,-` -''\ For the above listed reasons, WY recommend that the development propose mitigations at the SR 99/S. 144th St. intersection that would impove safety and maintain the existing LOS-11. (7) In order to help mitigate the traffic impacts generated by the commercial development of the site, we recommend the city impose upon the developer the requirements of the SR 99 route continuity plan. This plan specifies a 7 -lane roadway design with a 13 foot wide two -way left turn lane. This plan has an alternative based on recommendations from a recent Puget Sound Council of Governments study. The outside lanes would be used exclusively for HOV (high occupancy vehicle) purposes. Also, a median barrier down the center of SR 99 is proposed in the .future to restrict left turn movements on and off the highway. We do not know when or if these recommendations will be implemented on SR 99. In the meantime, froze improvements include construction of cement concrete curb, gutter and(?"--- nd `5 f sidewalk along the site's entire SR 99 frontage together with the associated roadway widening and enclosed drainage system. The front face of the curb should be located approximately 42.5 feet from the SR 99 centerline. (8) Mr. Doug Johnson of METRO (684 -1597) has requested through King County (see enclosed letter) that an existing bus zone adjacent to the supermarket property be upgraded. This will need to be coordinated with METRO and Mr. Gene Holeman of WSDOT Traffic Operations at 562 -4248. If any of the proposed bus shelter is within WSDOT right of way, an air space lease will be needed. Ms. Pat Sautter should be contacted at 562- 4383 if an air space lease is necessary. June 13, 1990 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Page 4 (9) For any changes to channelization on SR 99, a full size channelization plan must be submitted for review and approval. The channelization plan should be a minimum scale of 1 " =50'; showing both sides of the highway or the entire intersection (whichever is applicable), while including lane widths, tapers, pavement markings, lane markers, existing accesses, and stationing of all breaks in continuity. Terminology stated in the State Standard Specifications should be used when referring to pavement markings and lane markers. Enclosed is a copy of a WSDOT District 1 "Checklist for Channelization Plans" to help in the preparation of the plans. (10) The traffic analysis should be stamped and signed by a licensed PE familiar with traffic engineering. Once we have received the above requested information, we will finalize our comments. In the meantime, should you have any technical questions concerning comments 2 -4, please feel free to call Eric Bonn of our Traffic Analysis section at 562 -4236. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562 -4274) or Robert Eichelsdoerfer (562 -4297) of my Developer Services section. Sincerely, RTE: rte ES L. LUTZ, P ilities / Devel.per ervices Engineer cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Ron Cameron, City of Tukwila Paulette Norman, K.C. Dept. of Public Works Barbara Questad, King County SEPA Center Doug Johnson, METRO Larry McKinney Hal Eden, Carlson /Ferrin Architects Erin Bard, The Transpo Group Encl. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION EXISTING CONDIIONS\ Roadway and Intersection Characteristics Traffic Volumes and Level of Service Traffic Accidents FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT Traffic Volumes and Level of Service Planned Roadway and Intersection Improvements 8 10 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Ass '11 Traffic Impacts ibmment ......... ..... : 15 11 Pedestrian Traffic ' . • SUMMARY APPENDIX - LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA LIST OF FIGURES; 1. Project vicinity Map', • • • • • .......... • 2. Site Plan . ... . .... ........... 3. 1989 Existing Traffic Volumes ...... • . 4. 1992 Traffic Volumes Without Project 5. Project Generated Traffic Volumes (Net) AM Peak Hour, Noon, PM Peak Hour. AWDT . , • .r, � . . ....... 6. 1992 Traffic Volumes With Proj ect ........ .. ... 7, Suggested Geometry ry S "144 t1; Street ....... . .... . ...v_ LIST OF TABLES . Existing PM Peak Hour Level of Service (1989) 2. Level -of- Service S ummary °1992 Without Project ,a 3. Traffic Volume - Peak, Period Summary 4. Trip Generation Summary r.. 5. Trip Distribution for New (Primary) Trips 6. Level -of- Service Summary - 1992 With Project rtes report doeuments,the traf analysis rmed the r . " , � c impa analysis rfonn a prn cation and expansion of the existing Larry's Market which is now loi for a nor t e ti orated on the north corner of the ASR, 99/5 144th Street intersection , . . ),.,: ii':0 i °''" r- west :.,, 144th ersection in the Sea-Tac area of King County :,Thii area is in the process of b '-Y if, �', being annexed to the City of Tukwila. The project e w 11 p jest SEPA review will be done by the city. The relocated Larry's Market would increase the store size from the existing 31.900 gross square feet (gsf) to 54.332 gsf. The project proposes to move the existing Larry's Market from the northwest corner to the southwest corner of the SR 99/8 144th Street intersection. The proposed project site was lately occupied by an MEW drive -_ m. in restaurant and a mobile home /RV sales and service facility. Figure ,1 shows the project .;` vicinity: Access to the site would be provided from driveways on S t 144th Street and SR 99. The driveway on SR 99 would be right -in. right -out only. site Y ire 2 shows the proposed t plan and location of driveways for the project. The project is .. r occupancy planned for 1992. in �r- The scope of the analysis was developed in conjunction with Ron Cameron of the4 City of Tukwila and Robert Eichelsdorfer of the Was Y ` i " Washington State Department of Trans porta tio n (WSDOT) Spe c i. fic ,.� .� in_ t , te r sectons addressed in this$ to aY a re aa s follows: ows • SR 99 at S 144th Street 89399.50 :_ ,, • 1r ST S Qt fi S 1547N ST 22 a,. d Om . . ICKE 110,. ST Ti ST.. IA;tr,OtAn:I'd wan I•.1 .• t 1pi t ••( 11..!tIj'.� Per scan craned try THOMAS 8RO$ MAPS Thls map is copy,pned W THOMAS BROS. MAPS. _. '� 11r. u,too j 10 Copy a 'C0 0duCe as a any pail thereat "nettle, b, personal use a rove. "*hour remission 0. 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, ; 'pm'dna* odsNildl eyl 0566069 Lipid egs t ey EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway and Intersection Characteristics Roadways in the project vicinity have the following characteristics. .� • SR 99 is a five -lane principal arterial with two travel lanes in each direction and ,,lane. a center two-way 1P+t- +,•., ' i mile per hour (mph). • SR 518 is four -lane freeway with a 55 mph speed limit. There is an eastbound on -ramp at SR 99 and westbound off -ramps at S 154th Street • fir' y S 144th Street is a two -lane collector arterial with turning tions. The speed limit is 25 mph. S 146th Street is a two -lane local access street with a 25 -mph speed limit two-lane local access street. x y S 152nd Street is a two -1 The speed limit is 25 mph S 154th Street is a two -lane minor arterial with turning lanes at intersections. The speed limit is 35 mph. Three of the study area intersections are s ignalized: SR 99/S 144th Street, SR 99/ S 152nd Street, and SR 99/S 154th Street. All other Intersections analyzed within the study area are controlled by stop signs on the minor legs. Traffic Volumes and Level of Service Traffic volume information was based on counts performed in summer and fall of 1989. Figure 3 shows existing PM peak -hour traffic volumes in the project vicinity. The PM peak hour was selected for analysis as the combination of background and project trips is highest during that period, creating the greatest impact. This is further discussed in the Trip Generation section of this report. The TRANSPO Group, Inc.;" Page 4 '' 3153,d3 MARKET Rgure 3 1989 Existing Traffic Volumes ranspo 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rwil:,'iv 1, !1✓',.L.f s'.�;� - .. _ .'.. _'jF+ln�.,,+ f4'`�,�•i,d.e - "'',.,, yi? ,::. Existing PM peak hour.levels of service (LOS) were calculated at the major intersec- • • Lions in the study area u the 1985 Highway a.. �' i9 �J �� Manual (Transportation Research - i . 4-, , ; a s i ems . ji'� �;j,'4 Board) methodology. Level of service is used to evaluate and quantify operating conditions , and traffic co estionnat intersections:' At s s; level s_ ` ''''• � signalized intersections; of service is mea -, sured in terms of the average vehicle delay. At stop-sign c , n r ' ' � i • I .:.„ r t : l f • � y p sigh controlled intersections, level of „• service is measured in terms of the reserve or unused capacity available for critical turning , movements.. Level -of- service values range from LOS A, indicating free - flowing traffic, to, LOS F, indicating ting extreme congestion and long vehicle delays. Table 1 shows the existing t PM peak -hour level of service at the study intersections.' Level -of- service criteria for Signal- ized and unsignalized intersections are presented in Appendix A.' li''''•'• r -' " ' 1 t-'1.- ("" ` ":'{ <' G, .. .r: 4 iC I, ' e !...i, , t #^aft Table 1. Existing PM Peak -Hour Level of Service (1989) Signalized Intersection' ?; LOS .:<< a +f +'i,> `Avg. Delayl • SR 99 /S 144th Street O "1* , ;' f 23.2 'xT Et fit�f'2, o 50.6 - ' SR 99/S 154th Street •'1'`'• • >60 • • SR 99/S 152nd Street } �` § 1'11 :! i Unsignalized Intersections'''`'` Movement2 Reserve • SR 99 /S 146th Street Eastbound Overall D ~ 115 SR 99 /SR 518 EB On -Ramp . • Southbound Left . D 182 S 154th Street/SR 518 WB Off -Ramp Northbound Left 199 1 .,: ; Average delay expressed In seconds per vehide. 2 : r - Worst movement shown. ` '\ �`• ; Reserve capacity expressed in vehicles per hour. • WWThe level-of-service analysis reveals that the SR 99/S 152nd Street intersection is 1B_ -iti• 1. Y a^4+ it :�:. ;. 7 y, +.... • . -..� .I.fle(7�tpr .'.. • . • currently approaching capacity (LOS E). The poor level of service+ Is P rimaril y •related to s -:I.tt yd9.i -� -.;r • . f F , •'ros.- '•�o'.i.: isa.1W 4 •,, ... : heavy southbound traffic on SR 99. The southbound traffic on SR 99 operates at LOS F. Over- capacyit�yy''conditions (LOS F) now exist at the intersection of SR 99/S 154th Street. "'� i-ioti' ^li1S •71`�t"4 i'SR 4'��1•*:z. -- }.- ji.•sR� Hyi( �"f�l - .rNr'.:h `w .Ili. The level -"of- service conditions rim YEA y primarily impact the southbound and eastbound move= ments The south and east traffic operations at this intersection operate at LOS F. • 89399.50' ' x7 �^ _ ' t ' The TRANSPO Group, Ina Traffic Accidents Historical traffic accident data at the study area intersections for the years 1986- 1989 was obtained from WSDOT, District 1. This information shows that the following two intersectiont within the study area have relatively high accident rates: SR 99/S 144th Street and SR 99/S 154th Street. • • ` The relatively high accident rate of 12.1 accidents/year at the SR 99/S 144th Street intersection is primarily due to rear end and left-tum accidents. An equal rate (3.5 acc/yr) of each of these accident types occurred. The rear-end accidents are likely caused by congestion on SR 99, which tends to make drivers impatient or inatte.ntive. As for the le.ft-turn accidents, they are likely affected by the lack of protected left-turn movements on S 144th Street. • . - • , • The accidents at the intersection of SR 99/S 154th Street are primarily rear-end accidents. An average of nine rear-end accidents occur annually. 52 percent of the average annual accident rate at this Intersection. Again, congestion is the contributing cause to rear-end accidents. . , • ' 4, • 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. . • • 4. e Page 7 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT Erdst.ing traffic volumes in the project vicinity were increased by a .1.0 percent f • • • • • e•-• ; , annual growth factor to obtain traffic volume forecasts in 1992' the estimated buildout year for Larry's Market. This growth factor was based on the average historical tr-affic volume 8. • t growth on SR 99 which is 0.9 percent annually arid was increased to 1.0 percent to account ; resulting 1992 PM peak-hour trallic volume forecasts in the project ;Vicinity. • ., for the effects of traffic generated other nearby developments. Figure 4 shows the • , I • Level of service was calculated at intersections in the study area using the estimated ,.. r , , •',.14 ' ' 1992 traffic volumes without the project. Table 2 illustrates the results of this analysts.rp , 1. For comparison purposes, existing level of service is also shown in Table" 2. '' ; I ,.,. Table 2. Level-of-Service Summary - 1992 Without Project Signalized Intersection • SR 99/S 144th Street • *- = SR 99/S 152nd Street SR 99/S 154th Street Existing ' ' 1992 W/O Pioject LOS Avg. DeIay1 LOS Avg. Delays C 23.2 E ; 50.6 F >60 D E 32.6 57.4 >60 Unsignalized Intersections Movement2 SR 99/S 146th Street " Eastbound Overall SR 99/SR 518 EB On-Ramp ' Southbound Left S 154th Street/ SR 518 WB Off-Ramp • Northbound Left • 1 ' Average delay expressed In seconds per vehide. 2 Worst movement shown. •, • 3 Reserve capacity expressed in vehicles per hour. . • . • . . ' .• • • ' • Reserve Reserve „ LOS 'Capacity3 LOS Capacitr3 • ••••••1•••_, • . . • • r ick 4.7 ;-. • • ' % The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • • • ; t"! Page 8, North 1592 I( 360 938 E• �E R ure4 1992 Traffic Volumes Without Project Transpo Group 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 9 ti , °A ' The level of service tit the intersection of SR 99/S 144th Street is forecast to . decrease from LOS C 'to LOS D with the 1992 traffic volume forecasts without the project. The level of service of the southbound Left turn at the SR 99 /SR 518 eastbound on -ramp intersection is expected to decrease from LOS D to LOS E. All other study area inters . ec- bons are .. ., maintain— n _.... .. expected to maintain operations and 1989 level of service. Otis t "t, } ,....p i 7t -... j 0 . Pi a .1';:;s: , <,. .. 1. 1 ! ? :'!f.:j !:- : >..v..,.y I ,i Sqe, :3dt,is/. r: ;F ^:' f :fid � ;a '` 1` 'W. Planned Roadway and :1•.,.. ' :ts,..:.• Intersection Improvements • The King County Department of Public Works' Capital Improvement Program (1989- , 1994). King County Transportation Plan (1987). and WSDOTs Sunshine Report were reviewed for planned street and intersection improvements in the project vicinity. King County has . long -range plans to pave the shoulders of S 144th Street from Military Road to SR 99. The estimated budget for the paving project is $53.000 in 1987 dollars. This project is identified as a medium priority project in the draft King County TransportationPlan and is currently R tl v ? unfunded. • • The City of Tukwila will be studying the impacts of installing a seven -lane section on SR 99 in the project vicinity. t ity 89399.50 t?'irif. J� t ' 1, �E }hiyt ti .. , r.. r <...4 1):31 :4'.t .aAvR.r ?,T-` P7Y.c4•- . ..i1 . 1 . ;111 FUTURE CONDITIONS, WITH PROJECT Trip Generation' P generation the . ".f,R The eneration for ,, ; ,, .. proposed Larry's Market project was estimated basyed.ryon • 1 . w Y... ..* may. K F;;' }YY' Ya�%i{+ 'actual cash register receipt data collected in May and June of 1990: The electronic cash registers have a feature that allows the number of hourly transactions to be recorded ' Each transaction + r r <i.% , NV' . represents one round trip —one trip entering the site and one trip leav the site, Therefore, to ,r.,:::: ete q !' c:� " r t,. Y ^¢�y�`tn{t, » ..' ,: . ,:. ;;�:i ��a determine the total driveway trips, the number of transactionsy�q:'1 multiplied by two. In addition. a factor of 5 percent was applied to the data to represen employee and delivery trips, 7 '.t'a' ,r .i.1,,�'jt.t .3. It '.T i`f••:i1 ' 1'' 1,,, '•�•t 4 ! 1'+ s t :z : i1- Finrl..+nv i.LS .�r,�+.e�r &g, ;The resulting trip rate from the cash register receipt data for the PM :peak hour is 192 trips per 1,000 r ,This is comparable <` s 1� parable to a study published in the issue of 1TE Journal which provides a rate of 23.4 trips per 1,000 gsf for "superstores" in the PM peak ' .: hour. TTE T } 4, Generattori publishes a trip generation rate of.8.82 per 1,000 gsf for stores in the PM peak, which is .less than one half of that used in this study. . [i... 1 H ir.fi - Vii. " 'r'' (t�e..`t '4:41' rLtaxtr��etS J5 y To determine the a ro date when PP P analysis period for this study, ,the time period w .-; the sum of the project - generated trips and background trips on the street system would be the highest was evaluated. Tube counts performed by WSDOT in 1990 on SR 99 at S 144th Street were obtained to determine the AM peak, noon. PM peak, and Saturday r hourly volumes. "The project . trip generation was performed for those time periods as well. On Saturday, the time period was 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. because the project trip generation for the Larry's Market peaks on Saturday at that time ''The volumes are summarized below in' Table 3. ' ' praas a :` .�, ,., t',. . • ,.,, t .1, za , tri t!1C,Y't,ti +Set ; .ii i.. y ii ' f'ff3�49Gt�k�4v ', y +. t'ft44.1r:h }'fi•iss�. • [ ' `•�p H y ..�.•y�.}' . ; 1X i' 7' tir• [ 1r'S.'� [ -'s, i nC '.,tY�.. . 89399.50 .' 7 "' The TRANSPO Group, Inc. ,, : , 5 . .,.. ,. < Page 11 Table 3. Traffic Volume = Peak- Period Summary Traffic' t Volumes . • .. Trip •- neration • Weekday • A -aS •. Vy�1 {� °t \AM Peak Hour' "� 1:" ik -: , Noon '.tt• t ".ry 7 PM Peak Hour • ., Saturday A y Y:% I l a ! , }:, Peak Hour (6.:00 -740 p.m.) ft. • 1,563;,:,5 1,824 9 1,043 • ;Egt,t;' •• • i� 1,001'-..; 1,183 . 1990 traffic volumes from the south leg of the SR 99/S 144th Street Intersection. . • i- .•iX.. -..., 1 'E., e. t•,,,. , ,.. ,•' • ' - ,: ;..;.c''-., ,.. J... . :,; - ;tf. ,. '1'a °,p' By reviewing Table 3, it is clear that the weekday PM peak hour results In both the • high neration for r'.'•.'. trip Ptg Larry's Market and the highest volumes on SR 99. •Therefore. the PM , :. <q , „t peak hour was selected as the analysis period. f. . . -- s• '1a k., i .1,0. , . if.,.- '11: - 4.‘..-.-•44.:-.1-'i- ! k{=:,:r I}- .. The project is expected to generate 315 AM peak -hour driveway trips, bog weekd "° f weekday ` noon driveway trips, %1,043 PM. peak -hour driveway trips and 11,312 daily • t ` ! ;: - ;, : • + driveway trips Nationwide studiesf A�h{�� avQ/e detezmined that new grocery stores do not generate all new trips, In fact, the drivewa 4# f r”. „ ,': ,. d, aytrips are made up of three components: diverted, pass -by, and new • ,, 4 • • I.. .. .r: ,L.. 'it w. °'f0. ;:'.y ..i -. ",G.. Diverted Trip � r . t ��:: t . D.;,_ Trips ':;5::s aft y::. "�'.L,. '`C.t' a1.' :F'�r— Diverted trips are those that deviate from primary z•t tn. $ ;�d.t;k;1 w '" rti i -`4`st f.Fo�°4 ae 42 , th� �1�,9�o1�yr�- normal route to reach the +•�f. u•(f �{'.a .�Y�.'�k + i V L ai lx ..,==o et. 'Y• F�•!tv di!a• • � \I•% f�. b.1 % . project site. For a grocery store, these trips are normally diverted from other nearby gro- >'. y , ... ....e:'. 4.:.17 ;l •. 1,, .t s . br1, t OK feN4101R. .i, :i3' = r:4:F'.. +: • ce ry sh oppi ng opportunities. Depending ing on the location of the other grocery , stores relative to the study area selected for a traffic analysis, diverted trips often are counted as new trips in the study area However, if a larger study area were selected which, included other gr eery stores where trips are diverted from, the trips would not be new to the street system. , Since the Lany's•Market is being relocated, all of the trips from the former site can be assumed to divert to the new site This represents 59 percent`of'the total driveway trips • at the new store site No further additions to the percentage ojf� }diverted trips ♦♦were l; assumed. This. is because no' other grocery stores are sufIIcienT . • tly,nearby to'create inversion that would appear as' diverted trips in the study area. '� 5 `�` p''' ` •-‘ • 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, Inc.. • Page 12 1 Pass -by Trips .._° q M r , molt 'iht :.' , , ' C t i s ` ' t ? - i i i "it'd w r r . Y 3 1 4 0 . isory,,,r .e ; *Ck,$ ? �t {, J a : Pass -by trips are thos., a .- te_ by 5±v, another purpose, such. as returning to home from work, .. r by the s �.^ es& and stopby ite These are already on'the street system bordering the.site. Factors affecting the number of pass= by trips at a grocery store site include the number of vehicles passing the site on the bor during arterials, the easetoffaccess to the site, and thetype,.of shopper opport ty avail- • able (for example a store with a deli would generate a greater number of pass „by trips than one without a de11):fl , To estimate the percentage of .pass -by trips associated with the proposed supermar- .> A 6 av .. { . a .. .+s•4 ..t s • L+.1tRW'MYATW4i' "'Sr _ }•+..:, -r 1 w {N{, ket, the regression equation found in the "Quantifying Pass -by TYips •. t+ .., • . {, • �- _ section ✓ of • Generation was used. ✓The, equation was developed from surveys at 38 retail Centers of f t; • r s.. ,..� .tan ..t,, , , _ a { ous sizes to.correlate the percentage of pass -by trips with the size of a shopping center. This data shows that smaller shopping centers tend to have a higher proportion of pass -, trips than larger retail centers. The higher percentage of pass bytrlps at smaller shopp • . • centers is likely. related to the existence of convenience stores or superm Out in those .t t •F `a1ssy• w -.: , w6.w ns.sY.w1.a •.Y." ..11;s13!' ral+ S. shopping centers.The1TE }sury +eys show pass -by trip percentages ranging from :8 to 82 ' • percent. Therefore,} using 1TE's regression equation to estimate . � � pass -by trips is reasonable. Based on the 1TE methodology, the percentage of pass -by trips for the Larry's. Market ,would be 44 percent. Normally, approximately 40 percent is used for a grocery store -- pe hour pass -by percentage.' Sixteen percent was selected for the pass -by percentage due to new activity at the relocated Larry's Market site. Many of the trips currently using the existing site,are pass -,. ", by trips. All of these existing trips; are considered diverted in this study but some portion of them are actually pass bys originating on SR 99 or S 144th Street. If the ass P bys due to '' the existing store and the expansion were combined, they would result in a 40 percentt b,1 1 '41, pass -by rate. • • • .., ' t4sn,I New Trips • This study focuses on PM peak-hour traMc operations —the time of day when v cle volumes in the project vicinity are at their greatest. In general, grocery stores generate'; • very few new or primary trips, especially during the PM peak hour €' It is not typical for e . •'::+ 7's is *•, :.: , • "1:44;14: *4TM+F: f;' 1±k4 wk,} { a'•�,ny, drivers to venture out to make an extra grocery trip during the PM peak hour'simpl , • tir iff t it 37i5!r' ' • Via, �::, Nk .4,y because a new store has opened. 89399.50 ,� r J Y if.'n e 1 7: ,. ; }, New trips at generated by population growth. The Puget Sound Council of ernment (PSCOG) estimates very little residential growth in the Sea -Tac area between 19 and 2000. An annual growth factor of 0.6 percent is used in their travel. forecasting model. Due to the low growth in the Sea-Tac area, most of the project driveway trips would not be new trips, but l already be the system. r ° a ' 4f,4 .-et, *41 '0•i?,.a '''yf '7` .x.te r. oi... 7)11 !y ".� +. .t nl:. tlh �iJ. - ;«r'X•.' triz;ia" 3,4:ei'' A single survey reported in TTE's Trip Generation states the new trip percentage fore, • grocery stores to be 20 percent New trip rates for shopping centers range from 5f .n - • 6 to 52 percent (per 1TE). A new trip rate of 25 percent was selected for Larry's Market to represent trips new to the study area.. Twenty -flve (25) percent is a reasonable figure since it is greater than the 20 percent quoted by 1TE for grocery stores and falls in the middle of the range for shopping center new trips. ; For this project, the trips due to the expansion are the pass -by (16 percent) and the . new trips (25 percent). This study assumes that 60 percent of the traffic activity due to the • -"Matiti9 grocery expansion will be new trips to the study area. Table4�summ store arhes the wvay ;, a� . . n x b driveway s A Z ?!• .::'r; tyre �`.t'. '• .f'���,cuf�iL4V� ic'ai i'' Percent - Trip Type , Driveway Trips ; • ; ; Daily In u1 ; Pass -by ; ,' :16% ' 4415iNt a 1,810 ... : 85 4,182 • • D'nrerted r3� sltr'.:;z 6,674'."x: t,,,, 3141• -301 • New <,. 222 ;rs;. 2.828 - , 133 ;tire b%+. Total @ Driveway ;f -100% -' '" - '` 11,312 532 . is 511 ' . ~f 1 89399.50, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. , J Trip Distribution and Assignment 4, , '' Trip distribution patterns for Larry's Market were developed for the new trips, the, pass -by trips, and the diverted trips. These distributions were based on existing travel patterns in the project vicinity, the location Of housing in the area, and the locations of the other supermarkets in the area.. The distribution of new or primary trips would be fairly uniform, due to the location of residential areas within the market area. Pass -by trips are biased to SR 99. •Diverted trips p are simply relocated from the existing Larry's site across S 144th Street. Table 5 s •' F,,,,� a ..� . summarizes the distribution an= trips.' Figure 5 and Figw shows the project generated traffic volumes and the total 1992 PM peak hour` traffic forecasts with the project. y i �°s Table 5. Trip Distribution for New (Primary) Trips Roadway SR99: . S 144th Street North South East 2 West g r`. Traffic Impacts & Mitigation Measures L..' Intersection Operations` -' Level of service was calculated at the six study area intersections and two site driveway intersections using the 1992 traffic volume forecasts th the project. Table 6 ,... 241, summarizes the results of the 1992 with project level -of- service analysis. For comparison purposes, level -of- service values for existing and future background conditions are also • shown in Table 6.. 89399.50 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 15 S :hi• 53 173 1880 • • 'S land St $ Iaam St 8 249 i+" ;•� "s aLL ' AM Peak Noon PM Peck AWOT 89399.50 fr" S 152)d St • 44S,R ��al:Y :.air. �f't Y'�lY •41' nr . `ti`Y a ',� 4 —546 Jaf 74 'V.j ,., S 154th St 529} --a tootind ;fa- r 5 - • ' . t iaL"vr. 144.. *s'ra.+x rte tie 1992 Traffic Volumes With Protect 89399.50 g; r, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 17 Table 6. • Level -of- Service Summary -1992 With Project Signalized Intersection f • SR 99/S 144th Street ,!.;•.,14;.,.( SR 99 /S 152nd Street i :ax, i.4 i SR 99 /S 154th Street • • Existing • , ;1992 W/O Project 1.1992 With Project' LOS. Avg Delayl LOS Avg Delay LOS . Avg Delay • +Cs �-�fit�P. _'.�.��.', �,� ��,C �;,L'• 232 50.6 0, . • F >60 ; I %ix:3241 %4d)' ;y ?-691:14t F >60 F >60 Unsignalized Intersections Reserve Movement2 LOS Capacity3 • Reserve Reserve LOS Capacitty3: LOS Capacity3 SR 99/S 148th Street y' ' Eastbound Overall '. D 115 D ` 113 " °w E' SR 99 /SR 518 EB On- Ramp ; �,: < ?' , . Southbound Left ,> ,'. , ; ,D 182 • f E l 60 rk• E S 154th Street/ SR 518 WB Of- Ramp'' ''� '} ;''' ' Northbound Left ` ` " ' D 199 D ' 111 ' D S 144th Street/Project Driveway ;,•i. ';.,. Northbound Left ": +: • ., . — — — D SR 99/Project Driveway Eastbound Left — — — B 1. Average delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. 2 Worst movement shown. • 3 Reserve capacity expressed in vehicles per hour. 1,•1 (_. "Y:' :i t. 64 54 ,. 101 142 383 • SR 99/S 144th Street - The level of service at this intersection is expected to :worsen from LOS D to LOS F in 1992 with the addition of the project traffic. • The drop in level of service is mainly due to an increase in activity on .'P S 144th Street. f+e V .If .� a� r{ � � a AJI Y+�i.�i F Wad wt24 1..; • 1 >.. .•. ." 1 i`. nre, ..,.tt • • - ,,..,c Yt'>'i" 1y,. s'sr irr..=}f^i'.'Mj The best solution to mitigate the poor operating condition would be to add a • :1, 1 M' •:q..,.. �flg:• •. +F.. .. q�.♦ v .7.. �, .r ry e..! 4"rt Oottsite .r.. ^io second eastbound left -tum lane and add left -turn phasing to the east and west •,., -- st:l w' ,mot . ..,_,•;. `IA ' , � .6 e.,.+ !r �i•i�lf7+'! 400° «tie1 -11'L' ` legs. There ia . inadequate right of way on S 144th Street to construct a second .a•. ,y r`y r. y. .'A «d «n . •. .... .. 1 'y'1 afjG 1".f's left -turn pocket and right - of-way acquisition can be lengthy. In the interim; the .,r,ti;..,•,.,` "'..' rrr' r. .,r ..Nook..:( -4 A'`Y:i.Y•�' «, i:irY e.r1/'•14. signal may be operated satisfactorily under the - existing geometry with the """ addition of left-turn phasing on the east and west legs. it • - i /s tf.r ruttrik+o ':af . ',.c: • h. Mr4 . %'kt t4 tr 1« • �.r'.. L r:. 'f (. - •i5. ••••, ;, , .,.r;i;r:•t : ,:...'t t14 -, + ",.. ,•.,,• i"ie:.tri**`Ct'4 1C('; A double left-turn lane is superior to this interim single lane solution because it •r 't ,,rt•», t,.t 4L, allows more storage for left turns, thereby allowing an incre ase of.the sig Caw ' ..t A 7.5 time allotted to the SR 99 thru phases. To clear a single left -turn lane, more • signal time is required to be allotted to that phase. (y {�� (� • Y �Y 9'1 10(.12Y' illy ewit oat Under the interim scenario, the intersection would operate at LOS E (43.7 sec /veh) and LOS D (38.8 sec /veh) for the two left -turn lanes scenario. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. . The City of Tukwila will soon be investigating, the widening of SR 99 to seven a,. � .. •. .. •a.2#i¢iq"wli�di�(.f aP:au L��.9ti lanes. , • If. SR.99 :were widened to a seven -lane section, the intersection would . operate at LOS D.¢�The project proponent has, indicated tha't� ythey will .construct ..; _ .. ...'., j�: 4 ..,S.:I�, 3.4'�Irrp!•�'�.�.�.J�jjw'a.i,j Yn,. frontage improvements,, if the city requests them, to match a future seven -lane section. In addition, a "no protest" letter to participate in funding an SR 99 corridor widening project would be provided. C .vV SR 99/S 146th Street - The eastbound, left-turn level of service at this iunsig a1Ized intersection will decrease from LOS D to LOS E 11;1992 with the *`project-generated volumes from Lany's Market.-No project trips would .be," added to this left -turn movement.' r, x s;; t eV VVOY4 SR 99/S 152nd Street The level of service at this intersection„willworsen from ' LOSE to LOS F. in 1992 with the project.: The project adds:70 vehicles during the PM peak hour which is 3.0 percent of • 1992 total: entering vehicles. LOS,,F .z, conditions are due to heavy southbound thru yolumespn.SR 99. Re f , , largely eavy •.t, allocating the signal timing to southbound flows improves this intersection to LOS C. It is clear that this retiming would meet north -south progression goals. on -SR 99 without over taxing the side - street ys capacity lt�GF i* 44, a Y TOar*ii„`'t am SR 99/S 154th Street - This intersection currentlyoperatesat,LOS,F and, continue to do so in 1992 with or without the project.. /The heavy southbound thru volumes are the main reason for poor intersection operations.' The seven lane SR 99 section would be the only mitigation that could improve operations to better than LOS F. Only minimal improvements can be made at this inter - section since there are physical restrictions limiting additions of travel lanes in the existing right of way. Re- optimizing the signal timing can reduce delays. However, the level of service would remain at LOS F. The project adds 70 trips to this intersection during the PM peak hour which is 2.4 percent of 1992 total S 154th Street /SR 518 WB Off-Ramp - The northbound left turn at this unsignalized intersection will operate at LOS D in 1992 with or without traffic volumes from Larry's Market. SRSR 518 EB On mm� . . LOS E conditions for the southbound left turn at• this unsignallzed intersection are y��♦ expected in 1992 with or without project-gent,,, crated traffic volumes from , . �. Larry's Market. The project does not contribute any vehicles to this movement. Prr lest drivewava - The project site is accessible :' •1: . a tp j by driveways on SR 99 and S 144th Street. It is estimated that 283 vehicles will enter the ro '• , ' r p jectvia a left turn from S 144th Street .d i ( a x wing the PM peak hour. This volume warrants a separate left-turn � r • pocket. It is suggested that a two -way, left -turn lane be installed on S 144th Street from the existing left -turn e project driveway. he SR 99 project driveway pocket at SR 99 to the Y• Turning movements at both driveways � w111 be right -in, right -out oruy.�,t� c� t . .g - . c : ys will operate at LOS D or better. Since there are two access alternatives, safety and traffic operation problems are not anticipated. fi,. .5_14. Stree* n.,,.,n+,..` P,; ` .9 z r. • The congestion at the SR 99/S 144th Street inter. section will create`queues for eastbound vehicles which '4* ^� ` , ` - 3" day �S -144 �± � ..: may block the project -, on -144th Street_zincl zadv b►; 'e t Q4 A : analysis :., was performed that indicates the average eastbound left . turn would be " a 160 feet. The project driveway is located 280 feet from the SR 99/ r. �Rr'• - .'. . -, -.- - S 144th Street intersection; therefore, the queue would not block the drivewa nor interfere with entering left turns. ,;;. ure 7 shows a suggested configuration for S 144th Street. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 1 'auk `dna9 OdSNYE1184J. 0766£69 Property Line „l. • o �S 1 Iedestrian Traffic ' When calculating trip generation for, the proposed relocated Larry's Market t# 1, it`s` was assumed that all of the project trips`would be vehicle trips.'' However; due to 'the tr ximity of several home's to the site some`of the trips would be pedestrian trips; 'Th ould add to trips the edestrian the P, already on the adjacent street system, especially if 144th Street. H 4-:4 4 Mt :,Li r i h,: . ,. . $'';1 s .i.ti , .Say 1.7 S 144th Street has 6 -foot to 8 -foot paved shoulders on both sides to accommodate Iedestrlan and bike traffic:' Pedestrians can be observed at all timeaduring daylight hours , on S 144th Street." Since it is relatively low volume and no traffic control exists between •' 1111 Road Sand SR 99, pedestrians tend to cross at any convenient point along " S 144th Street. z "No mitigation is available to safely control pedestrian crossings on it 144th Street? The project will construct concrete sidewalk along its frontage which will prove pedestrian safety in the immediate ty project vicinity by providing grade separation etween vehicular and pedestrian traffic ` ,''"' ' -' ' ": C ,T `; `-* , :3 :te: riil k 6. say;t f�41.r,kt;t° The proposed relocated Larry's Market #1 is estimated to generate 1,043 PM peak hour driveway trips, 25 percent, or 361 (133 in/ 128 out) of which are new The project traffic will have a direct impact on S 144th Street and the intersection of SR 99 at S 144th Street. Recommended mitigation is as follows: "` • • Construct left -turn lane on S 144th Street as shown.in Figure 7. f' r ;i • v :'t o i,;;7. err; . • Add left -turn phasing to the east and west legs at the SR 99/S 144th Street intersection. • ; Construct a second eastbound left -turn lane at SR 99/S 144th Street when right of way is available. ign a letter of "no protest" towards the widening of SR 99 to seven lanes:. Construct frontage improvements on S 146th Street, S 144th Street. and SR 99 to include pedestrian walkways. The project would have only a minor impact on the other study area intersections, and no further mitigation is suggested. Y• 89399.50 j The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 23 3 i4' 1'4 Level-of-Service _ :,1,�* ce Criteri .. ,;. Level -of - Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Stopped Delay Level of Service Per Vehicle (Seconds) A Less than 5.0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F Greater than 60.0 Level -of- Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Reserve Capacity Expected Delay A 400 or more Utile or no delay B 300 to 399 Short delays C 200 to 299 Average delays D 100 to 199 Long delays E 0 to 99 Very long delays F Less than 0 Failure - extreme congestion NEW wrr LH ONE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIL UILIjl1 Ili III tlll� QH U11,1101 II IIIIIIIMIII IIIIIIIIIII umo,.Eae. 1IIRI 1111mIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIUU D 11111111 IIIIIIIII k,11H1 11_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII SITE PLAN IGIIIIIIIT VICINITY MA' CARLSON /FERRIN r' U VelwaraacarEcrcour- KaEUTb.6a,iK— -� w LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South SITE PLAN _sr U CARLSON/ PERRIN L A • LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 pacific Highway South GRADING PLAN MILO 1 • • yy''�II . u• PLANT SCHEDULE Q 0 0 0 ram's Marker LEGEND Panic tiTw'aY s■m SECTION C — - �cili\Hi9h \pwh CARLSON/FERRIN r _r RE VIM allella1P1_16.10_ 1 Ills I I I I 4 I I L V /Iii 11,111fi� VDS) i� .ve ABBREVIATIONS ate GAL • Sao pn o lift i_ III �) 1 ) ■r .��,�j Ci -IiC aid• mow. ,e1 l ®1 1b 11111 1111 1111 1111111 111111rt ®]— _ L 4? _a API 4. O » bO NOTES Apartment Buliaing AGar {ment Building Apartment Building ri SCALE C.30' 0• 3 YI YII� Beck & Baird/Seattle MO w� 996121 Sub 5.16 12061 at at z.» • LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUL 0 9 1990 PERMIT CENTER gteEIVED an OF TUKWILA JP. iERMIT CENTER CQ 4re, 9..147, rr, TR a. • ,, .‘,.iT, ' 7./—C-4- \ ', ■ \ 1, , 1,,. , '': i:: 44 ,,,i': ii ' ' .." I ' I 1 ' h M- - - .\1 „. , r'77- . ....... ..!ildfigrattger: tm WI wif.. sffleinellialLIDIMMT:n .,.. -- 1 4 —1 _ _ J i;; 4RADE AT OOLONG WEST ELEVATION CARLSON/FERRIN _nrj U *ZHU! WitiMI—VIVW_ LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South BUILDING ELEVATIONS EAST WEST 1 • olJatn, I fri.JMNIM glt,rrot41- [F•ert, p•ce. t 1.44 - ..t.4 al'ettit turn. 7CI CO, I • ' Irk." • ' , 0.1 111111115111111111111111111111111111/N. CARISON/FERRIN WILDING 1.1.47 {10,r1 AN.SRAGE [OW. erAR4,-,,,TaRt.-Vt )1■,1212T1-1 ELEVATION • I 1 I, 114 I 111 . 111111 II 1,'11,11 111,1 hi,. 1,1111111,1111.11011111j )501.111.- \,,"101,1 LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South BUILDING ELEVATIONS NORTH SOUTH ^rs -•-^^ - /7L " ,„ /" /'•/ (-1 r^1 ""-•-•"r •cf'Diwo VIEW FROT1 ADJ4CENT MULTIFAMILY HOUSING CARLSON/FERRIN mr- 11 REVIELY INMLILIIAT-ViAD= • LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South 0 1 4017-144,17 1.4 ag riTtl • :411,111t I _ I • ,--.0•••••••••• $•••• ••••■• • •••:: dr 1 • 1101—t••••• - • Ail% LNAJO' •- VILIJ FROM S. 146TH STREET AND PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH CARLSON/FERRIN. _Fri II] treario.74t:AwagictiuwiCZ • LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South VIEW FROM PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH CARISON /FERRIN J ❑ REVIEW 90:1111....1 • LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 Pacific Highway South 1 1 LO'C1UL1 A a'w 101I 0 .•p-£Z: -S1 3S ' .. .if�ft p•L �ILH�'l01'11MLN 'L ' •; � gig 1 ,/ `0 '�' E 3 a 2 Ate II N '' ;~ _ Rib4 ' 0= 'S "3/0/1514 3 C ° ui - 1•11 b ojzV't Oro lS n ; M ' NO O w LOJ Q U (L"3 WW OCCZEI BE FIER 0.0.0',. <J (I) MAFS • AXLOT _ 7515 W I5. 702 153 51070:3 or •1 ASSLS=0 ID'LCCA ?II0 Y'._" i:ca+ Q [•- »:.is : r.- : ' ' Pt01247Y IM IS OtY CU,S. 61AM1tt1iOCO.RIT 6SC.�50n A. /.94'� �.J ^u�OO i]En.t•�1I .•'. I . Am. ••an.1�< dArea 1. 413P ,LOR �MSArv,7t41M 4� TO 5)66 ACCURATE 4.bwull -tS. :� v.T.,1 cls6._ ea sm. ��0�5 a >1.�.� WS�5 =2 'yu COUNTY C II�° N W 22_23_4 i mrn .,. ,.!!2•1•3.3•211. KING 'CD�i� 1 f �i S.S`JLS.D�I7I SCALE r_ loo• L.a. .i,uum. S :...' U i n ... la psis `nn _0.033 .'I� , 4._..'W. i•` I I 1 /e•, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 29 30 Ea LI LEI eEI ,•n 11..13 •.. » j • • •55 (rapeiruro 0.,•11 AL••• ..3.f.x 274.] 40.04 \AC 004100"' 321.47 j cuo 3413 SVW9.22 -23 -4- - 1322 1 DOWL E N G I N E E R S IA Division of DOWL, Incorporated 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 0 1990 PERMIT CENTER T.I.R. LARRY'S NEW NO. 1 August 10, 1990 W.O. #511106 15263 NE 90TH STREET • REDMOND • WASHINGTON • 98052 -3523 • 206 / B69 -2670 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW I 1 -3 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 11 1 -2 III. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS III 1 -2 IV. RETENTION /DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN IV 1 -23 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN V 1 VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES NONE VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS NONE VIII. OTHER PERMITS NONE IX. EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN IX 1 -3 X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/ X 1 -5 DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL XI 1 APPENDIX A DOCUMENTS DEMONSTRATING NO TYPE I WETLAND OR TYPE I OR II STREAM I. PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION The Larry's Market site is located between South 144th Street and South 146th Street on the westside of Pacific Highway South. The site is bounded on the west by apartment complexes. An Exxon station owns a parcel of ground in the northeast corner of the project site and an apartment complex owns a 115' + /- by 157' + /- parcel in the southwest corner of the site. The entire site is either paved with asphaltic concrete with intermittant v concrete pads or, for purposes of hydrology, hard - packed earth. EXISTING DRAINAGE The site drains to the east as sheet flow, no swales are present. Storm water flows are excluded from the subject site by apartment complex retaining walls on the west and existing storm drain systems on the north and south by South 144th Street and South 146th Street respectively. Sheet flow from the site enters an existing storm drain system on the west side of Pacific Highway South and then flows northerly, exiting the site at South 144th Street and Pacific Highway South. The site is indicated to be in the Lower Green River Basin (North Section) by Reconnaissance Report No. 24. However, the existing drainage systems show the site to be in the Duwamish River Basin with flows ultimately emptying into the Duwamish River via a small stream. The drainage system is piped for over 2,000 feet and then joins a unclassified stream. Appendix A includes a map depicting stream designation and an inventory stating wetland classification. The downstream analysiss discusses the offsite drainage to 1/4 mile downstream. 1 There are no wetlands within the site or within one mile downstream. ' Ground water seepage was encountered in localized areas during the soils investigation. 1 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ' The site is being developed by construction of a supermarket. The market will be used by the community for the purchase of food stuffs and sundries. 1 The improvements consist of the construction of the market and necessary vehicle drives and parking and truck loading and unloading facilities. r DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONCEPT Storm water runoff will be collected in a piped system and conveyed to a 1 detention tank (pipe). Drainage along the west side of the building will be conveyed to a catchbasin by a swale that runs north and enters the piped 1 conveyance system at the northwest corner of the truck loading ramp. Drainage flowing east near the north edge of the parking lot will be collected ' into the pipe system on the west side of the north entrance. After the storm water exits the detention tank it passes through a biofiltration swale to 1 improve water quality. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r •, k 47 : it •r,-' ,,- v.t .1'' i�a:„�:.5 Je;a/ r<- `+:t1,� �,' '?` •: . a • t t-t•' • TECHNICAL INFORMATION-REPORT, (TIR) WORKSHEET g vt at Y tt %l7ft.;. tiliu aPk sCAI. { King4 CountrBulldingiand .LandiDevelopmentalvlslonr-x !. PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER - Project O wner= =LA- 21ZY•- kSUkIE- V\ \( Address 525- M- Gi1_.v AST -- Phone -- Project Engineer "H'U H --K CAW N G Address Phone 2E.01v14 t, it4 ---%GS -261 O PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION n Subdivision El Short Subdivision LJ Grading Commerdal'' 17 Other ., PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 2 - -- Project Name L.A212..y: Sr:: J Location -- - _.__._ Township Z 4 Section - Project Size Upstream Drainage BasinSize -_AC= PART 4 OTHER PERMITS D DOF /G HPA ED COE 404 0 DOE Darn Safety FEMA Floodplain' El COE Wetlands �:�- , _� Q= ::- Shoreline'Management Rockery - El Structural Vaults? Ili Other`::. 0 HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN - Communi Drainage Basin D U W A IA 15 H. 'RN iZ T3AS11J PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS EJ River 0. CfItIC -c1l Sfr@afrl Reach ..� Depf@ssi0ns/sN"rales -"' -�` O Lake -O Steep Slopes _. o.= lakeside%Erosion we ( Floodpiain W@tland67 ._ 0 :Seeps/Spnn9s Q High Groundwater Tables -' Q Groundwater Recharge drier = - -: ..: i�`+ ia•.S ��z n�` �i� 'tw�a".g3'eo:^.�".- ,sC'"'rfi? c;'; PART 7 SOILS • Soil • Erosion Potentials t3 mo~K . ive Velodttes� • ! i =L Y _ �.. .: hfiYL.•f:.S:z4Y •C �.i ^re -a.t �L`. _ -. _. .fr.... .. ♦ •. 1;King C.Minty. Building and Land Development Division . . EcHN icAttiiNFORMATIoNTREpORTifriRy0woRKtHEET,- :44saw.,..- Page2 ot 2 1 1 1 • 1 1 Additional Sheets Attatched 1 PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS "Pl'"f",-1•MINIMOM ESC REabiREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 10 Sedimentation Facilities 123 Stabilized ConstructiOn Entrance , 1 Perimeter Runoff Control . Clearing and Grading Restrictions_ O Cover Practices Construction Sequenc . - F-7 1 MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS ••.• FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Stabilize Exposed Surface Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Umits of NGPES Other , • ; PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Grass Lined Channel C4 Pipe System - n Channel 1151 Wet Pond Brief Dedoription of System Operation - &I.,k--TA W - R.. - . • ••• Related Site Limiiationa ' 77 ED TAdditith* Sheets Ntaioneo - - - Rci ER3 Tank - - O Vault O Energy Dissapator O._ Infiltration , = Depression - E Flow Dispersal ED ::Waiver Regional Deten tioti i.Method�fMa1ys is 14`e IeR'Rg' - Compensation/Mitigation „--..7.of Eliminated Site Storage,. Facty - ' — Urnitation . - • • .--,-. • . :;„e, - - •-• • .• • • . , • , , . • PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS (May require special structural review) EZ:1 -tinRla*Atati LP?, • -r PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER .4T"n"lv.4.'"II--.4""m"*.-- in Filar a I, a oer'u Clerti"-`1YLlemy'supervision: avp,vi fted_1111, ciffici,...,..siviiirsiceirobvio;,.. • • 4-0 111 rumor 1LII , e nice itt ik magi stwRT[ � • .' � re EF' i� TH • SW 1065W J See Man 26 DIREC OR VERNIER WINES C,SM� Kr01 S 110 Z JO 0 R 101ST w N N 104TH S B0E1 0 110TH 16241 • t:7 L y1 .118T14—ST— II6TH PE 11. ] ♦!G.„ 11: TH OVTHf N EIGHTS PAR0 15150 BSTs RNfRTON 'T .,000ERAL i1;14, HOSP� ". l T .E. ,. n 5T ^ KENNEDY fNS RPO ENSMG • 5 145TH II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY • • Tho rntdy r".. 136 4 / 1 . � ' ;ie\ aie ' �r' r„ +1.. 1: SCi: ■ t_ : 1 " =I, cc ' c -7 Y Pc ', P t_o ET-4.w o o a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 dDOWL ALA.3KA ENGINEERS T E S T L A B COMPUTATIONS Project Name Lnpf,y r /14(A) # I Client Name Sheet / of Prep a by: 77/'Da 90 Checked by: Date - -£ • -1 i 1` i i —_a 4 . w/t r rr 7,d) , / /.Z� 3 Q Q. - i • E �- I `l E ; , -• i z l '� /pjelrr j _n /c1 (). 1 4= a /' 01, o e i 7'etf) --1 — �— E i ; — t 1 1 -- — ti nC li ( + f 606 I E � i i t � ( ! ( 1 t 17 . I.i i 1 1 .I i I 1 i i , i 1 i l i t I i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences April 29, 1990 Project No. T- 1096 -3 Larry and Suzie McKinney 525 McGilvra Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Larry's Market South 146th Street and Pacific Highway South King County, Washington Dear Mr. and Mrs. McKinney: We have completed the geotechnical engineering study you requested for the proposed Larry's Market located near Tukwila, Washington. We previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for this site and presented the results in cur report dated August 11, 1989. The purpose of our work was to explore the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the proposed building area in order to develop recommendations for foundations, retaining walls, surface and subsurface drainage, site preparation and earthwork. The scope of our work included observation of general site features, backhoe excavated test pits, laboratory tests, geotechnical engineering analyses and the preparation of this report. This report presents the results of our study and summarizes our conclusions and recommendations. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Our study indicates that most of the site is underlain by glacial till soils consisting of dense to very dense silty sand soils which extend to the depths explored. Gravelly sands were encountered in the southwest portion of the proposed building excavation and along the westerly site margin. Localized fill soils are present under the central part of the site. Light to moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at various depths in several of our test pits. Foundations may bear on dense native soils or on structural fill. Excavations should be sloped at stable angles or be supported by engineered retaining walls. 15301 N.E. 90th Street • Redmond, Washington 98052 • Phone (206) 881 -5570 • FAX No. 869 -9173 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3338 • Redmond, Washington 98073 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 In general, excavations of up to about 13 feet will be needed in the western portion of the site. The proposed cuts will encounter a combination of very dense, cemented silty sand soils and seeping gravelly sands. The silty sand soils are glacial till and will be difficult to excavate. They are also moisture - sensitive and will be difficult to compact during wet weather or under seeping conditions. The gravelly sands will be suitable for use as fill. Seepage is expected from the cuts. Hence, provisions for permanent subsurface drainage should be made along the west side of the site. There is an existing retaining wall about six feet high along the west property line. Cuts of up to 13 feet are planned in this area to create finish grades for the parking area. In this area, the excavations should be provided with temporary support during construction. Also plans can be revised to start the cut slope no closer than five feet from the wall and be inclined at a 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) slope. The following sections of this report describe our study and present our recommendations in greater detail. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site is located on Pacific Highway South from South 146th Street to South 144th Street in King County, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. It is planned to construct a new supermarket at the south end of the property and develop the remainder of the site as a parking lot. The existing Exxon station off the northeast corner of the site will be remodeled at a later dated. The existing conditions and proposed building area are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. This plan is based on a Boundary and Topographic Survey prepared by Tim Hanson and Associates, Inc. dated July 1989. The proposed building outline was transferred from a Site Plan by Carlson /Ferrin Architects dated April 17, 1990. The new supermarket will be constructed of concrete masonry units and will encompass an area of 56,000 square feet. Structural details had not been finalized at the tim8 of our study, however we anticipate th4 perimeter load bearing walls will carry four kips per lineal foot. Individual columns may carry loads of up to 100 kips. Cuts of up to 13 feet and fills of up to seven feet are planned to construct a level building pad for the new supermarket building. The finish floor elevation will be at Elev. 319. Cuts on the order of five to thirteen feet are planned for the western perimeter of the new parking lot. The remainder of the parking lot areas are near existing grades. Fills up to about five feet may be needed along the east side of the site. Retaining walls with heights of those discussed above will be needed to support the planned cuts and fills. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 If there are any changes from the planned construction as described by us, they should be reviewed by us. We recommend you submit final plans to us for review. Following our review, we can inform you if they comply with our recommendations or provide you with supplementary design information, as needed. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Subsurface conditions on the site were explored by excavating seven test pits with a rubber -tired backhoe on April 3, 1990. We returned on April 25 to excavate an additional six test pits. The test pits were excavated at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The locations of the test pits were determined by chain and compass measurements from known site features. The elevations of the test pits were determined by interpolation between topographic contours shown on the site plan. The field exploration was monitored continuously by our engineering geologist who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative soil samples and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Figure 3. Representative soil samples collected from the test pits were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Moisture content determinations were performed on all samples. The logs of the test pits are attached to this report as Figures 4 through 10. These logs present our interpretation of the field logs, taking into consideration the results of laboratory examination and tests. Grain size analyses were performed on representative soil samples, and the results are plotted on Figure 11. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is situated near the top of a north trending ridge between the Duwamish River and Puget Sound near Tukwila, Washington. The site is composed of three parcels, and excludes the property occupied by the Exxon Station to the northwest. At the time of our exploration, the previously existing buildings on the site had been demolished. The site consisted of a series of paved and unpaved, terraced parkin areas separated by fences. Elevations on the site range from Elev. 340 at the southeast corner to Elev. 298 at the northeast corner for an overall relief of 42 feet. The grades are gentle and average five percent. Flatter and steeper areas exist around levelled parking terraces. In the past, the property was occupied by a trailer sales and maintenance facility. An underground tank present on the site was removed from the site. The soils in the tank excavation indicated no signs of contamination. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 Streets are present along the north, east, and south sides of the property. Apartments are present to the west. A six foot high retaining wall is present along the west property line in the southwest corner adjacent to a four story apartment building. Subsurface As indicated by the test pits, subsurface soil conditions across the site are quite variable. In general, medium dense to very dense glacial till soils underlie the site at shallow depths and extend to the depths explored. Glacial till is an unsorted mix of sand, silt and gravel deposited at the base of the glacier which filled the Puget Sound basin between 15,000 and 30,000 years ago. The till was overconsolidated by the weight of the glacial ice sheet and is relatively impermeable. In Test Pits TP -5, TP -8 and TP -9 we encountered gravelly sand soils which extended to the depths explored. These gravelly sands were found to overlie glacial till soils in Test Pits TP -6, TP -7 and TP -10. Two to seven feet of old fill soils were encountered in Test Pits TP -4 and TP -6, at the east margin of Parcel A. Groundwater Light groundwater seepage was encountered at varying depths in Test Pits TP -2, TP -3, TP -7 and TP -10 through TP -13. This groundwater typically occurred as seepage perched above the less permeable glacial till soils, and flowed through the upper, weathered till soils. Light seepage was also encountered in the gravelly sand soils in Test Pit TP -5. Groundwater levels vary seasonally and should lessen or diminish during the dry, summer months and recharge during winter and spring. Heavy seasonal seepage is likely to be encountered in the proposed building and parking cuts. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on our study, it is our opinion that the project may be constructed as planned, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the project design and construction. Based on the preliminary site and grading plan provided, cuts up to 13 feet and fills up to seven feet will be required to achieve a finish floor at Elev. 319. Cuts of five to 13 feet are planned to construct the parking areas. The faces of the cut slopes may be supported by retaining walls or they may be sloped at stable inclinations of 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). Due to space considerations, it appears that retaining walls will be required to support the building and parking lot cuts. The west and portions of the south building walls may be designed as lower level basement or retaining walls. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 4 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 Cuts of about 13 feet are planned in the extreme western portion of the parking area adjacent to the existing retaining wall. To construct a new wall in this area, it will not be feasible to make temporary excavations adjacent to the existing wall without causing loss of support to the existing wall. At this location, we recommend starting excavations no closer than five feet from the wall and making them no steeper than 2:1. If the new wall must be constructed adjacent to the existing wall, we recommend providing temporary underpinning of the existing wall during construction and designing the new wall for surcharge pressures imposed by the existing wall. Building and retaining wall foundations may be designed as conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils. We do not recommend the construction of rockeries over four feet in height, since they cannot be engineered to support specific lateral earth pressures. Groundwater seepage may lessen or diminish during the dry summer months. This will facilitate earthwork for the planned excavations. However, long term provisions for interception and drainage of groundwater will be necessary in cut and /or retaining wall areas. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report is the property of Terra Associates and is intended for specific application to this project for your exclusive use and your representatives. This report may not be used by others without authorization of Terra Associates. The following sections of this report present more detailed recommendations for the various geotechnical engineering aspects of this project. These recommendations should be incorporated into the project design and construction. Foundations The proposed supermarket may be supported on continuous spread footings bearing on competent native soils present below the topsoil layer and any localized fill soils or on compacted structural fill. The near surface soils below the topsoil may be loose in some areas. Hence, depending on the depth of excavation required to reach footing grades, the near surface soils may need to be recompacted in place. The planned building grades will extend through the majority of the old parking lot fills on Parcel A. Footings should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade. Continuous and individual spread footings may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf). A minimum width of 18 inches should be used for all footings. A one -third increase in the above bearing pressure may be used when considering wind or seismic loads. All footings should be provided with steel reinforcement in accordance with structural requirements. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 5 1 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 Excavations Temporary excavations must be sloped such that instability does not occur. In general, we recommend temporary excavations over four feet high be no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). Localized caving of the sand soils may occur in the southwestern portion of the site. Permanent cuts of five to thirteen feet are planned for the west perimeter of the site. These cuts will encounter a combination of seeping, gravelly sands (outwash sand) and very dense, cemented silty sand (glacial till). Due to the potential for heavy groundwater seepage in the proposed excavations, we recommend that subsurface drains be installed at the toe of the cut slopes. Permanent cuts should be sloped no steeper than 2:1. Excavations in glacial till may be inclined no steeper than 1.5:1. Excavations that cannot be made at stable inclinations should be supported by structural retaining walls or basement walls. Retaining walls may be used in conjunction with stable cut slopes. There is an existing six foot high retaining wall along the north half of the northern most property line. Combined with the proposed thirteen foot cut, the new grade change would be nineteen feet. In this area, we recommend that all excavations be set back at least five feet from the toe of the existing retaining wall. The proposed cuts may extend east from this line, and be constructed as stable cut slopes and /or retaining walls. Retaining Walls Retaining wall foundations should bear on competent native soils or on structural fill placed above competent native soils. The foundations may be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf). All footings must extend beneath organic soils, and any loose fills, or all loose soils must be removed and replaced by structural fill. Based on information obtained in our test pits, competent native soils will be present at the base of the proposed building and parking lot cuts. In the' southwest portion of the site, a retaining wall may be constructed adjacent to the existing retaining wall along the west property line. If the new wall is within a 1.5:1 inclination of the toe of the existing wall, it must be designed for surcharge pressures imposed by the existing wall. If the new wall is to be constructed very near the existing wall, we recommend using a soldier pile wall which can be installed with minimal disturbance to the existing wall. Once the precise location and configuration of the wall has been developed, we will be pleased to assist you with evaluating the various options available and preparing appropriate design parameters. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 6 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 Lateral Loads Retaining walls should be designed to resist the lateral pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Where a surcharge slope of 2:1 is present above the wall, the design pressure should be 45 pcf. Where walls are restrained from free movement at the top, they should be designated for an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 pounds per square foot. Horizontal forces may be resisted by passive pressures equal to those imposed by a fluid with a density of 350 pcf. This value assumes that all footings are poured against structural fill or undisturbed native silt soils. A coefficient of friction of four tenths (0.4) may be used between concrete and soil. Walls must be provided with continuous subsurface drainage around them. This drainage will accommodate seasonal fluctuations in groundwater seepage. The drainage system should consist of a perforated pipe placed at the toe of the footings. The pipe should be embedded in free draining material such as pea - gravel. A twelve inch minimum width of pea - gravel or similar free draining material should be placed adjacent to the wall and extending to the top. The perforated pipe should drain by gravity to the storm drain system. Drainage Surface gradients on the site should be created to direct runoff away from the building and toward suitable discharge facilities. Perimeter foundation drains should be installed and tightlined to the storm drains. Retaining and basement wall drains should also be tightlined and discharged to the storm drain system. Roof gutter lines should be separately tightlined to adequate drainage facilities. All drains should be discharged into the storm drain system. The project grading should allow for water to flow away from the building and be collected in catch basins in the parking lot or similar facilities. Water should not be allowed to "pond" at any location. Site Preparation and Grading The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of old asphalt, fills and topsoil. The stripped topsoils may be used in non- struct_uLa1 areas. The proposed cuts should extend through localized fill soils, and will encounter both very dense glacial till and seeping gravelly sands. The glacial till will be difficult to excavate. Depending on the seasonal groundwater level, the gravelly sands will experience some caving during construction. For areas which will receive structural fill, following stripping, any loose areas noted should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill or clean crushed rock to a depth that will provide a stable base. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 7 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 Structural fill should be placed in thin layers and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D -1557 (Modified Proctor). The on -site glacial till soils are high in fines content, making them difficult to compact during rainy weather or when placed over existing wet conditions. The gravelly sands encountered at the southwest corner of the proposed excavation are suitable for use as structural fill, provided the groundwater seepage has diminished by the onset of construction. The quantity of these sandy soils is limited, therefore it may become necessary to import till soils. The old fills along the east margin of Parcel A are wet and clayey and are not suitable for use as fill. Pavement Construction Pavements on the site may be constructed on the recompacted native soils below the vegetation and topsoil or on compacted structural fill placed after stripping the areas of vegetation, topsoil and any debris, depending on the depth of cuts or fills required to reach design grades. Where structural fill is placed, the upper twelve inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the ASTM D -1557 maximum dry density (Modified Proctor). Below the top foot, a compactive effort of 90 percent is adequate. Regardless of the compaction effort, all subgrade areas must be in stable, non - yielding condition prior to paving. We also recommend evaluating the subgrade conditions during construction to determine the potential need for subsurface drains along the west edge of the site. The pavement section for lightly loaded traffic or parking areas should consist of two inches of Asphalt surfacing over four inches of Crushed Rock Base or three inches Asphalt Treated Base (ATB). Along heavy traffic channels or in truck loading areas, we recommend using two inches of asphalt over six inches of crushed rock base. Utilities Where utility lines are to be excavated and installed in the paved areas, we recommend that all bedding and backfill be placed in accordance with APWA specifications. Fill placement and compaction should be in accordance with the recommendations given earlier in this report. Additional Services It is recommended that we be provided the opportunity for a general review of the final design and specifications in order that earthwork and retaining wall foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and construction. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits excavated on the site. The nature and extent of variations in the test pits may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, we would be requested to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report prior to proceeding with the construction. Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 8 Mr. and Mrs. McKinney April 29, 1990 It is also recommended that we be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations; and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We recommend that Terra Associates, Inc. provide the following services during construction. 1. Examine cut areas to verify that conditions are as expected and provide recommendations for subsurface drains. 2. Examine all stripped subgrade areas and the proofrolling operations prior to the start of fill placement or earthwork. 3. Perform field density testing of structural fills as needed during placement and observe the grading and earthwork operation. 4. Examine retaining wall and building foundations prior to forming and concrete placement to evaluate that adequate foundation support is available. We request that a minimum of two working days' notice be given to schedule our services during construction. The following figures are included and complete this report: Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figures 4 through 10 Figure 11 Vicinity Map Site Plan Soil Classification Chart Test Pit Logs Grain Size Analyses We trust the information presented herein is adequate for your requirements. If you need additional information or clarification, please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. • Anil' Butail, P.E. President DHG /AB:tc cc: Carlson /Ferrin Architects Project No. T- 1096 -3 Page No. 9 �LiLEV Cent., l;.... ,; ,I iN .�Bti � , -t` .rnn�o. <i ;' °46: x2 j .!s _i ;. 4e W .748TH sT8 c :1 SW ?•• ,1154:. ST 'I '"'s i isti'- • __L-'.'x ss I sw 13! urn +� • 1 '.1 _ 50 =. 22 • 567. ST. I• - r « ( • 1 i 1 1---r —[F .— II j' I.I I \\ II e • SEATTLE TACOMA • l I 1 DOUGUSI INTERNATIONAL •67 • j;1 A /RPORTJ I I 1 1 SfA -TaC n. _ li • s , r: 4 S 167,•$: S s .,. s' s1 ICKE :)Or. s IsnK 7 7 sr REF: Thomas Bros' Maps, 1989. /1.4 TERRA r-- ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants VICINITY MAP LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096 -3 1 Date 4/90 1 Figure 1 1 1 1 1 1 • .—ko•- • • • •c a- • • • :-.;;;..s.„, is B-2 TP-2 . • PI.RCE 9 ..; . _ 71s=1.1 _ ' • No; ; F:F. EL 319 e sso -ts • ....A, (I) :AY , *pi VrItIrt • " REF: Boundary and Topographic Survey by Tim Hanson and Associates. Inc. dated July 1989. 1 • LEGEND TP-13 APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION AND NUMBER B-5 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS CONDUCTED FOR PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY TP-3 p APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST PITS EXCAVATED FOR PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCALE 1"=1001 TERRA AS1 - ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultant SITE PLAN LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096-3 Date 4/90 Figure SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER SYMBOL GRAPH SYMBOL COARSE GRAINED SOILS FINE GRAINED SOILS 8 0 2, 0 ., 0 0 u-,o c N L a - z c� c ou 2 E 0 0 u) tts as 0 2 N GRAVELS More than 50% of coarse fraction is larger than No 4 sieve. Clean Gravels (less tha,, 5% lines) Gravels vrith fines. SANDS More than 50% of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve. Clean Sands (less than 5% fines). Sands with fines. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is less than 50 %. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is greater than 50 %. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Well- graded gravels, gravel -sand rixtures little or no fines. Poorly- graded gravels, gravel -sand rnixlures little or no fines. Silty gravels, gravel- sand -silt mixtures. non - plastic fines. Clayey gravels, gravel- sand -clay; mixture, plastic fines. Well- graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. Poorly- graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures, non - plastic fines. Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayeYy fine sands or clayey silts with slight olast,c!ty, Inorganic clays of Ipw to. medj rn plasticity, •ravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean 111111 III 1111 1 Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medic;m to high plasticity, organic silts. Peat and other highly organic soils. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS 2" OUTER DIAMETER SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER 2.4" INNER DIAMETER RING SAMPLER OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER SAMPLER PUSHED SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED WATER LEVEL (DATE) WATER OBSERVATION WELL C Qu w pcf LL PI N TORVANE READING,.isf PENETROMETER READING. tsf MOISTURE, percent of dry weight DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot LIQUID LIMIT,perc-nt PLASTIC INDEX STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per fool TERRA ASSOCIATES Ceotechnical Consultants KEY TO TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. No. 1096 -3 I Date 4/90 I Figure 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEST PIT NO. TP-1 Logged By .JIlifi. Date 4-3-90 Elev 317± Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 --..,- — -. j1IP31 Brown, silty sandy GRAVEL over gravelly, silty SAND moist, medium dense. (FILL) 13 .s,.. SM Red tan to tan mottled, silty, fine SAN]) with gravel, moist to wet, medium dense to dense. 5--- ' al-i'LL, Grey, moderately ceffented, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT with gravel ?) very dense. (Glacial Till) — _ — 10 15 Test Pit completed to 6.0 feet. — . _.. o:ge encountered:. Old footing drain encountered at 2.5 feet. • TEST PIT NO. TP-2 Logged By DHG Date 4-3-90 Elev 313± 0 __ - Brown, organic silty SAND with gravel and roots, wet, loose. (Topsoil) Al SI Tan mottled, gravelly, silty SAND, t, medium dense. 5_ -, . ...-:. :..- SI __.......... _Grey, partially ceffented, graveLly, silty SAND(inoist to li.4.44 dense. (Glacial Till) ": __ Test Pit completed to 2,2 feet. ; — Lt igh Lseepage encounterecrfran 3 to 4 feet.) 10 — 15 . /77:11 TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096-3 I Date 4/90 I Figure 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEST PIT NO. TP-3 Logged By __ IliC _ Date 4-3-9° Elev Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 . . ......7.,-. SM Brown, gravelly, silty SAND, moist, medium dense. (FILL) 18 8 5 --.•:,: ___r 10 -- -- -- 15 SM Red tan to tan mottled, silty SAND with gravel,(wet\ Y medium dense to dense. al-ML Tan to grey, moderately cemented, silty fine SAND with gravel„m5iSt-tO i,,e.t, very dense. (Glacial Till) _Test.Pit_completed_to 11.5feet.. ,. _ . ... . Light seepage encountered at west end of test pit frail., 3.5 to 4.5 feet.: ' . -- Logged Date 4-3-90 • • TEST PIT NO. TP-4 By DFIG Elev. 326± 0 —• .. •• ' GM Brown, silty, sandy GRAVEL, moist, medium dense. (FILL) 5 • :: SM Grey, brown and blue-grey mixed, silty SAND with gravel, clay and organics, wet, loose. -: (FITT) 27 - Brown, organic, gravelly, silty SAND over Topsoil, damp i to uet, loose. (Topsoil) :: 10 NI :: Tan, mottled, silty SAND with gravel, uet, loose to RediUM dense. 18 ' -Pill) 31 Tan, weakly cemented, silty SAND, uet, dense. (Glacial Test Pit completed to 10.5 feet. _ r '--- No -seepage encouriefe-d-7 15 TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKEY King County, Washington ./, •• '1 TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Proj. 1096-3 I Date 4/90 I Figure 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEST PIT NO. TP-5 Logged By ___1)11(; Date 4-3-90 Elev. 330± Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 — — 5 ..., SM Brown tan, gravelly, silty SAND, moist, medium dense. (FILL) 9 11 17 - Topsoil, wet, loose. SP-31 Red tan, gravelly SAND with silt, damp, loose to medium dense. — SP-SM Tan mottled to tan, medium SAND with gravel and silt, moist to wet,medium dense. . SCI Tan, cerrented, silty SAND with gravel, het, dense. , ::•...*:(}1--CP Tan, sandy CRWEI., with cobbles and silt, moist, dense. 10 SP-3I Crey-tan, gravelly, medium SAND with silt, wet, dense. __ -- 15 Test Pit completed to 12.1 feet. Light seepage below 7.5 feet to depths explored. Logged Date 4-3-90 By CHG TEST PIT NO. TP-6 . . Elev 324± 0 ,Gvai Brown, silty sandy GRAVEL over organic silty SAND moist medium dense. (ILL) GP-al Red-tan, gravelly SAND with silt, damp to moist, loose to medium dense. - 5—: SM Tan mottled'i., silty SAND with gravel, wet, medium dense. :: SP-91 Tan, weakly cerrented, gravelly SAMnidth silt, het, medium den. Grades into moderately cemented silty SAND, moist, very dense. (Glacial ft S't 10 — Test Pit cceplete4 to 8.9 feet. o se(—ep"-7---age encount-er...) 15 /777.7 TERRA 17.771rA ASSOCIATES TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096-3 I Date 4/90 I Figure 6 Geotechnical Consultants 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEST PIT NO. TP-7 Logged By DIIG Date 4-3-90 Elev 329± Depth W • (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 SM Brown, gravelly, silty SAND, wet, medium dense. (FILL) 15 SP-S1 Red-tan to tan mottled, silty gravelly SAND, wet, medium dense. - ..■ SM-GM Tan, silty, gravelly SAND with cobbles, wet, dense. sm Tan, Jdytonoderate1y ceffented, silty SAND with gravel-rT1DiaiO-WeE,7 dense. .........-_____-- (Glacial Till) 10 — — __ __ 15 Test Pit completed to 9.8 feet. Light point source7STeepageS:TOTICOOntere frciii 3.5 feet to cl-eiTiths--exid-or-ed. ' - --- - --------"------ ' Old footing drain encountered at 4 feet. Logged Date 4-25-90 By DHG TEST PIT NO. TP-8 Bev 318± 0 - Dark brown organic., silty SAND with gravel, wet, loose. (FILL) sp-ai Red tan, silty, gravelly SAND moist, 'Tedium dense. 5 SP Grey, fine SAND with silt. damp. [tedium dense. 8 ML Tan mottled, SILT with SAND, moist, medium dense. 22 SP Grey-tan, fine SAND with silt, damp, medium dense to dense. — 10 15 Test Pit completed to 8.3 feet. No groundwater seepage encountered. • TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington ' r•- .• :' TERRA 1.,_,':,•.-:.,-;•47-:---f__.: ASSOCIATES f - - • : ' .. , Geotechnical Consultants Proj. 1096-3 1 Date 4/90 ■ I Figure 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEST PIT NO. TP-9 9 Logged By DHG Date 4-25-90 Elev. 325± Depth • W (hj USCS Soil Description M) 0 --� 5 __ ; bM V3to 12 imheo of To il and Sxi) Red-tan, silty, gray ellySAND, moist' loose. 22 SP Red tan, cobbly, gravelly SAND with silt, noiat to dump' medium denae' ML` Tan, incerbedded, weakly cemented SAND with ailt and fine sandy SILT, dump to moist, dense. ' 3M Grey-tan, silty SAND with gravel, wet, dense. 10 __ _ _ 15 Test Pit completed to 8.8 feet. No seepage encountered. . Logged Date 4-25-90 • TEST PIT NO. Tr-10 By DHG Bev. 335± u . - 12 inches of Sod and Topsoil • • 3M Red-tan to tan, mottled, silty, gravelly SAND, moist to wet, loose to medium dense. SM Grey-tan, silty, gravelly SAND, wet, medium dense to dense. 17 -7.f. SM Crey, strongly cemented, gravelly, silty SAND, moist to wet, very dense. (Glaical Till) 1U--'/'~ -_ __ _ _ 15 Test Pit completed to 9'7 feet. Light point source seepage encountered at 5 feet. TEST PIT LOGS LARRYuS MARKET King County, Washington ,�,^,~,~ � TERRA �����K-K���� � ^"�^^^�~_"' ^" �.� ' Geotechnical Consultants Proj. 1096-3 1 Date 4/90 U Figure 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Logged By DING Date 4 -25 -90 Depth (ft.) USCS 0 5 10 15 TEST PIT NO. TP -11 Soil Description Elev. 316± W (a /o) — — SP T - Dark brown, organic, silty SAND, wet, loose. (Topsoil) 19 ____41..... S ::..cpilL 6 to 8 inches of Topsoil Red -tan, silty fine SAND, wet, loose to medium dense. :\ 6 Si R SP1-i`g Grey, strongly cemented, gravelly, silty fine SAND, moist to wet, very dense. (Glacial Till) 8 — — __ Grey -tan, strongly cemented, gravelly, silty SAND, moist to wet, very dense. 9 Test Pit completed to 5.9 feet. Very light seepage encountered from 2 to 2.5 feet. Test Pit completed to 7.8 feet. TEST PIT NO. TP -12 Logged By DUG Date 4 -25 -90 Bev 314± f ' `._ SP T Tan, fine SAND with silt. mist. loose. (Fill) 21 ____41..... S 6 to 8 inches of Topsoil :\ 6 Si R Red tan to tan mottled, gravelly, silty SAND, mist to 2 SP1 G Grey -tan, strongly cemented, gravelly, silty SAND, moist to wet, very dense. 9 Test Pit completed to 7.8 feet. 10 J TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096 -3 I Date 4/90 Figure 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Logged By DIIG Date 4 -25 -90 Depth (ft.) USCS 0 5 10 15 TEST PIT NO. TP -13 Soil Description Elev. 307± W ( %) TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096 -3 I Date 4/90 1 Figure 10 - 12 inches of Sod and Topsoil 17 _ SM -ML Red -tan, very silty fine SAND with gravel, moist to wet, loose to medium dense. I�. SM Grey -tan, strongly cemented, gravelly, silty SAND, moist to wet, very dense. (Glacial Till) — — Test Pit completed to 6.0 feer. Light seepage encountered from 2 to 4 feet. TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096 -3 I Date 4/90 1 Figure 10 in >- J z _ w 1- w 2 0 cc } = _N >- J z w w C/) K Z to S 0 Z w a x N w i 0 cc w w 2 z w W 2 0 z z C7 Z z W a 0 LL 0 w N_ N - t00 Z00 E00' P00' 900' 800' l0 Z0' CO' P0' 90• 00Z 00l 09 OZ 0 C '1, 'I; �I c I. L O 0 O PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT 0 O a 0 t0 0 O IIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIuIIIIIIIIIIInIIIlIIIuIIIluIUUhIu• MOOMMEMMOMMMOOMOMMINIMOMMONIMMOOMMOMOMOOMMOMMEMEMO MMIMMOIMMEMEMMEMEMMEMINIMMIMMENNUMMOIMMEMMEMMINIMMERM ■■ u■■/ l■ uIuIuIIIIlI■■ IliUuIIIuIIIIuIu ■■■uIIIuuIIIII■i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ mmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmvmsnmmmmmmmmmmmmwmm lII• lU■■ IU■UIIOMMONO■MMOMOM■■MUIMMODUII lIuIUIIIU 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111 J III1PIP` JjjP' 111,1 ' ■■ t_ ■ iiiiiiiiiiiiii �� ummu n� Z 0 0 CO 0 n 0 f0 0 N 0 0 O CI PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 0 0 t00' Z00 c00. P00' 900' 800' l0 Z0' £0' P0' 90' 80" N m w Z'f- w e. J p• 9' Z 8 LLI l 0) z_ Z [L C7 8 0 0Z OE 0 1 09 08 00t 00Z 00£ 0 w Z f 0 f w CI) CC 0 0 w z w m ¢ 0 0 0 Z Cn J w m i3 Cn w J CO CO 0 U J J � o 7 C of 0 o O a 0 to 4) 0 C/) 0 Cn _ 0. 0) 0 CU o me ium AND with _ravel Fine to coarse SAND with silt. I cr) � a ( Cr) t\ M M tf1 1 1 H H ❑ • TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS LARRY'S MARKET King County, Washington Proj. 1096 -3 Date 4/90 Figure 11 III. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS (See Attached Maps) The storm drainage leaves the site in a 12 -inch concrete pipe on a slope of 2.1 percent. The existing storm system at that point is capable of carrying 5.2 cfs. The 12 -inch storm drain continues northerly along the west side of Pacific Highway South for about 1,200 feet and then increases in size to an 18 -inch concrete pipe. The piped storm drain system continues downstream from the 1/4 mile point. The tributary area at this point i acres. /9S 14103 9 14123 9 4125 (NUKIH o.- B6 0 14;)!2 - -� -]- ;' 14118 ` ^ r , t 2 3 C7) 4 86. c' 7 8 5 1� �r 5 6 c Vc 14124 --15 -- 14 , 0 12 S �A 0, 11 , 10 h ‘ 1641 1 14132 1� 1 ., re, 86 ., 8 / 86 N M H ST l 42ND -- -110 .h' U4IS /C AT /c'�s..; 3 0.80 AC. E ''ER v, CC 51.17' ON L. 2 /9 TL. /1 1.16 AC 1.242 NORMAND 'GZ Sc V 6 ti ZZ 03?.AC. 264 TL /O 294.65 L / /Se o. 1 143 25 ° C, T ° 0.40 AC. o O.6 I AC.. /, N `� -L. '� /00 1, r. i F 2f, 4 7 �, U 31 .-jam•% / 60 / 0.r � G• /60 . /40 • 1— 1 . ' rAC. °v 41 1.03 P.C. N KVV1LA '< °P A 1 /) r 204 272.86 ;r, /00 S - �. ._ T -•• /44TH- -S1 --1-= . 9.9 ii3.8 / ,�-tz' A(y' „wSCbr r ft0e 103.8 i S �� io0 1� 1 1, �- 1 '1 I:.:. ;..:I to . ce n °'' ♦T . ` `.to 11•: 1 ' 1 .. . 1 � 1 P 1 t- ' 4228 — 08 AC. 1�1rr ':0 ti /1d 45 m 0 0 ♦-' I C 1442.4 o til 13 14 4a5I 0 -j23 11.435 1 UGE CT. MOTEL lee e /46TH /248 / /S. 8 IV. RETENTION /DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AD 0 W L ALASKA ENGINEERS TESTL AB COMPUTATIONS Project Name LAtZ.2.`‹ I Client Name c,,c0z tZ12. Sheet 1 of Prepared by: Date 8-2• Checked by: Date 1;11 ; • ; . • 1 • __I__ • j; I 4-14- — 5-17 I I I • I 1 1 I I 1 ' 1 f 1 4 I ' ; --" -- 1 ; ; I ; , . , ; ; APNZTME..1.1-1! • I. i • I • 4 i ' I I • * • i • 1 4, i 4 1 t I 1 1 , -a...4.. ...a-4 ............... ,.., .. .....-4-1- r 1 -- A- --1--- -4,- ; • , ., i . :- ; 1 , i • i I 1 ! NIZTHM.ENn.L._ -r t- ' ! -1 • I - I t ' i ; ; , 14...--9k-l• ,ve--1-- :..1 r I I 1_ ! t : , , • . ; ; . 1 I . . ,zr • • A!' . .. I .; I ; 1 , I --; -I ; ; , 1 I ; ; CE1T • - 1 • ' -- 1 I .LL 1:)..../Z■WC, 0 ; ! r I 1 ! 1 --; j 1 1 - -; ----i--- r- - ; I -- - -1- .171,yp LIc.:.. Ll_GROU P; ; .7." --/- i P I GO I i = ' ; l' -1---- ; ; ,- - , i . 1 ; 1----- 1 1---- 1 4,.; i 0 , , • [-- 1___1/ '"----. 1 _____,______i_ _ i E --:, I 2• , - , ' - -----( - -;1 / ■ I. 1 ' ___ _i____ : I -,-A, 1 •-• I i- I I j --t-- I ; an E - Z:. 4 i -; ! : ■ 1 1-q+ e' ..Li • UIS' . * : 1 1 . '4 -l- l- t • • 1.1N4--F-2-i, - ---- 1. 1. _ i_____ 4 -„ 1.----i,, 13.174—C. -- --,----: - ---. 1- -----T- i , t i -- 1 _LI I. . H ._ _,„ I 1 1 _ i • 1 1-11.._„ra___cuts !II I 1 1--- . -r.E12...zi , 0(A ' I i , 1 . , , L__ i f --; 1 • ' 1 --:,- 1 -=--- 0 , , , ! 1 _. __ - i -1 i i____11 lid; —I ••11..1 1 1 , , , , ! 1, [-it; .1 Iiii r__! I 1111111 1 H1i1 :Hi!!! Iii 1 ; ; I 1 ! 1,1,;11;1 Illi!. 1 DOWL- ALASKA ENGINEERS TES TL AB COMPUTATIONS w.o. # 1 HOG Project Name L t=42-AZ1/ t\ \/.1 Client Name CPOZ.LS 1E11•1_ Checked by: Date Prepared by: Date Sheet 2 of -7- . • . • I : 0 : ; 1 : • I • • 0 , , I . . -- - ; ..._ --• _. . , •;- : -i- ' 4- ; __,.. • ; --I : , • , , , ; • ' L_ , ; ; ; • : : . . • , . , ; --, I 1-I A.z.1; _ _P ...\IF-1)__Z,N WS.. , — -:-- I - .! - ---! i______ ....._ 0i-----4-- --I- - - :- ---i _ I i • 0 i : , ° • : • I 0 0 LI-L.:- -..j*I---■L..... ---.j,■-:: .1\1.1/..--:&..Ct -A?..ki .1...\N G. ; ' ! . ° . • ; 1 II " .......----.4 ---I; , • .- I... 2. _ ......_i _____.... _____ i I • .. ' !..i•-i--5"!;"'% --- 3 61 41. - ,2:t;•• - t ," - -' .6t, -1- --I ----,---1 1 , , " ; -, - I - • ; . i - f " --- - i ' 1 - 1 , -..-4 . __, r 1 'S't Et.T. i .F.-1...i.C=NINn ! t ; 1 I I i 1 ; . _.,_. I - i , I 1 1 t 1 '1 ■ 1 . t ! ! t_ _..! . ,z.74..z: ( ' . _ 1.___P • a i . ___ i . ,____ 1 1-1_7.--, o_oc,..■It ,,'_____2 ___,___ I._._ ...! , , s • , ,_- i . . . . i---- ; ; ;• - -1 , t ' t ; , S`r , ; . i ! = 0,._0Gdf ' ; I I I. 1 ' - • I 3 I I I . -r- , - : 1 '- r -I- • °- I r , , . _,_ =!C), --7- C) 1 : . , . . .,_ t- ( . • t 1 / 1 i , 1 ; 4I -1- , • ...._ t ; ---'7-• -; 1 : . ' ' ' , . • t___. 0, xi , - ;__2..,_;4_ IYYN. _i_A n _,. . , , I 1 - I , I I 1.I i . 1 I ■ , , I , 1 1.-- , 1(.-:Y 1 (0 ,i:CI..G 1 ) 1 i ! I I ■ , , ; , I 1 ' , . ; , 1 ; , 4 _ -. I-. ' : i ( • 0 1 i . : i ; 0 : : : i 0 : 1 ---:: ... I 0 I. , ..... ° . : ...1..._........_ • • I 0 , . 1 I ( I I , . I -.._.....„,..........).-- : 1 i , , • r ! • • ■ . , • ----. ,..... . i , . • k 1 •■ 1 • ' 1 ' • i ' ....... • ,,,, • • • .....- i . • ._;...\( 3 2 -r- I: , • ' I - - 2.2. 2.. -=-" 70 ! = I ,, ,i • , 1 •.___...•• ,, ....,..._ :Itiirl-1-.,,--1---,.--1-! ----I - - 4- ' ; • I ' - - - --1 .- I i I --- ! - i ' : i • , - -I- ,- " -71 1= ^Z .4 4 1 LiTa ' -=-! 3 ,..C, ‘& \ \ `r : U S a .: rnik,(3. _ 1 ; . I r- I I I 1 - 1 I 1 1 1 - -1- I , I 1 • • ; I • 'f'-• I , I r I 1 I I ' i I __.; I, I I t I I ! 1 i I I ! !,1-,•! III HI 1 r SBUH /SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH ITORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE -1A - 7 -DAY DESIGN STORM - STORM DATA FILE 1[PECIFY STORM OPTION: 1rC.S. TYPE -1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION NTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2.24,2 It * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -1A DISTRIBUTION * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** 2 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. * ** * * * * ** NTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1.23,87,3.74.98.5 IATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 5. 0 1.2 87.0 3. 7 98.0 5.0 I PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) 2.16 7.67 28132 ENTER id:JCpath]filenameE.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: Illarr LARRYSMK.2 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIN STORM OPTIONS: t1 - S.C.S. TYPE -1A 2 - 7 -DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE IISPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 IIS.C.S. TYPE -1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREO(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2.9 ' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -1A DISTRIBUTION * * * *** ** ** * * * *x * * * ** * * * * * * * ** 10 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ** * * * * * ** 1 ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV). TC FOR BAS=IN NO. 1 '1.23,87,3.74,98,5 DATA PRINT -OUT: ' AREA(ACRES) 5.0 ' PEAK- Q(CFS) 3.35 PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS A CN A CN 1.2 87.0 3.7 98.0 T- PEAK(HRS) 7.67 VOL(CU -FT) 43607 TC(MINUTES) 5.0 IENTER [d:][pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: LARRY SMK. 10 ,SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT. S - STOP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STORM OPTIONS: I1 - S.C.S. TYPE -1A 2 - 7 -DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE IISPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 IS.C.S. TYPE -1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREO(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 1100,4 24,4 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -1A DISTRIBUTION * * * * * * * ** * * * * * *x * * ** * * * * * * * ** 100 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 4.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ** * * * * * ** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TO FOR BASIN NO. 1 1123 , 87, 3. 74, 98, 5 DATA PRINT -OUT: 1 AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TO(MINUTES) A CN A CN 5.0 1.2 87.0 3.7 98.0 5.0 1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) 4.83 7.67 62888 ENTER [d: ] [path ] f ilename L . ext ] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROURA.PH : LARRYSMK. 100 "SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS HYDROGRAPHS 4- 3- 2 - 1I n0mrrlmnI nil 1nnnrtirinnn "9 III P' 1 1 I n1011111M 1nn�rtninn nqi 1.5 3.17 4.83 6.5 8.17 9.83 11.5 13.17 14.83 16.5 18.17 19.83 21.5 23.17 24.83 HOURS I SCS RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH USING KING COUNTY "HYD" PROGRAM CLIENT NAME: LARRY & SUZIE MC KINNEY PROJECT NAME: LARRYS NEW NO. 1 W.0.#: S11106 COMPUTER FILE: 511106E DATE: AUGUST 7, 1990 2 YEAR TITLE: EXISTING CONDITION HYDROGRAPHS 10 YEAR 100 YEAR PEAK = 2.15 PEAK= 3. 35 PEAK = 4. 83 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 No. STEPS 153 No. STEPS 153 No. STEPS 153 .00 .00 .17 .00 . 33 . 00 . 50 . 00 . 67 . 00 .83 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .17 .00 .17 .00 .33 .00 .33 .00 .50 .00 .50 .03 .67 .02 .57 .07 .83 .04 .83 .11 1.00 .01 1.00 .06 1.00 .14 1.17 .02 1.17 .08 1.17 .16 1.33 .03 1.33 .10 1.33 .18 1.50 .04 1.50 .11 1.50 .20 1.67 .06 1.67 .14 1.67 .25 1.83 .08 1.83 .17 1.83 .29 2.00 .09 2.00 .18 2.00 .31 2. 17 . 10 2. 17 . 20 2. 17 . 32 2.33 .11 2.33 .21 2.33 .34 2.50 .12 2.50 .22 2.50 .35 2.67 .14 2.67 .25 2.67 .39 2.83 .16 2.83 .26 2.83 .44 3.00 .17 3.00 .29 3.00 .46 3.17 .17 3.17 .30 3.17 .47 3.33 .18 3.33 .31 3.33 .48 3.50 .19 3.50 .31 3.50 .49 3.67 .21 3.67 .35 3.67 .55 3.83 .23 3.83 .39 3.83 .60 4.00 .24 4.00 .40 4.00 .61 -4..17 - - - -L4 4.17_ _ 40 4.17_ .62 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GD 4.50 . 25 4.67 . 28 4.83 . 30 5.00 • 31 5.17 . 32 5.33 • 32 5.50 . 33 5.67 . 36 5.83 • 40 6.00 . 40 6.17 . 41 6.33 . 41 6.50 . 42 6.67 • 51 6.83 • 61 7.00 . 61 7.17 • 73 7.33 . 85 7.50 1.25 7.67 2.16 7.83 2.02 8.00 1.14 8.17 80 8.33 69 8.50 69 8.67 58 8.83 46 9.00 46 9.17 46 9.33 46 9.50 . 46 9.67 • 46 9.83 . 47 10.00 • 47 10. 17 47 10.33 . 47 10.50 . 47 10.67 .43 10.83 • 39 11.00 . 39 11.17 . 39 11.33 • 39 11.50 . 39 11.67 . 39 11.83 . 39 12.00 . 39 12.17 . 39 12.33 • 39 12.50 . 39 12.67 . 35 12.83 . 31 13.00 . 31 13.17 . 31 13.33 • 31 4. JJ .q1 4.50 . 42 4.67 . 47 4.83 . 51 5.00 . 52 5.17 . 53 5.33 . 53 5.50 . 54 5.67 • 59 5.83 . 64 6.00 . 65 6.17 .56 6.33 . 66 6.50 • 67 6.67 .81 6.83 • 96 7.00 . 97 7.17 1.15 7.33 1.33 7.50 1.95 7.67 3.35 7.83 3.12 8.00 1.76 8.17 1.23 8.33 1.06 8.50 1.06 8.67 . 88 8.83 70 9.00 70 9.17 70 9.33 • '70 9.50 .70 9.67 .71 9.83 .71 10.00 71 10. 17 71 4.50 . 64 4.67 .71 4.83 . 7'7 5.00 .78 5.1'7 .79 5.33 . 80 5.50 . 81 5.67 . 88 5.83 . 95 6.00 . 96 6.17 . 97 6.33 . 97 6.50 .98 6.67 1.19 6.83 1.40 7.00 1.42 7.17 1.67 7.33 1.93 7.50 2.82 7.67 4.63 7.83 4.48 8.00 2.51 8.17 1.76 8.33 1.51 6.50 1.51 8.67 1.25 8.83 1.00 9.00 1.00 9. 12 1.00 9.33 1.00 9.50 1.00 9.67 1.00 9.83 1.00 10.00 1.00 10.1'7 1.01 10.33 . 71 10.33 1.01 10.50 . 71 10.50 1.01 10.67 . 65 10.67 . 92 10.83 . 58 10.83 . 83 11.00 . 58 11.00 . 83 11.17 . 58 11.17 . 83 11.33 . 59 11.33 . 83 11.50 .59 11.50 .83 11.67 . 59 11.67 . 83 11.83 • 59 11.83 . 83 12.00 • 59 12.00 . 83 12.17 . 59 12.17 . 83 12.33 . 59 12.33 . 83 12.50 . 59 12.50 . 83 12.67 . 53 12.67 . 75 12.83 . 47 12.83 . 66 13.00 • 47 13.00 .66 13.17 .47 13.17 .66 13.33 • 47 13.33 . 66 1 cn cc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,7.0/ ...71 1J. of • '11 .A. .--• t-+i ,!,.. 13.83 .31 13.83 .47 13.83 .66 14.00 .31 14.00 .47 14.00 .66 14.17 .31 14.17 .47 14.17 .66 14.33 .31 14.33 .47 14.33 .66 14.50 .31 14.50 .47 14.50 .66 14.67 .29 14.67 .44 14.67 .62 14.83 .28 14.83 .41 14.83 .58 15.00 .28 15.00 41 15.00 .58 15.17 .28 15.17 .41 15.17 .58 15.33 .28 15.33 .41 15.33 .58 15.50 .28 15.50 .41 15.50 .58 15.67 .28 15.67 .41 15.67 .58 15.83 .28 15.83 .41 15.83 .58 16.00 .28 16.00 .41 16.00 .58 16.17 .28 16.17 .41 16.17 .58 16.33 .28 16.33 .41 16.33 .58 16.50 .28 16.50 .41 16.50 .58 16.67 .25 16.67 .37 16.67 .52 16.83 .22 16.83 .33 16.83 .47 17.00 .22 17.00 .33 17.00 .47 17.17 .22 17.17 .33 17.17 '.47 17.33 .-..2 17.33 .33 17.33 .47 17.50 .22 17.50 .33 17.50 .47 17.67 .22 17.67 .33 17.67 .47 17.83 .22 17.83 .33 17.83 .47 18.00 . 22 18.00 .33 18.00 .47 18.17 .22 18.17 .33 18.17 .47 18.33 .22 18.33 .33 18.33 .47 18.50 .22 18.50 .33 18.50 .47 18.67 .22 18.67 .33 18.67 .47 18.83 .22 18.83 .33 18.83 .47 19.00 .22 19.00 .33 19.00 .47 19. 17 .."-> 19. 17 .33 19. 17 .47 19.33 .22 19.33 .33 19.33 .47 19.50 .22 19.50 33 19.50 .47 19.67 .22 19.67 33 19.67 .47 19.83 .22 19.83 .33 19.83 .47 20.00 .22 20.00 .33 20.00 .47 20.17 .22 20.17 .33 20.17 .47 20.33 .22 20.33 .33 20.33 .47 20.50 .22 20.50 .33 20.50 .47 20.67 .22 20.67 .33 20.67 .47 20.83 .22 20.83 .33 20.83 .47 21.00 .22 21.00 .33 21.00 .47 21.17 .22 21.17 .33 21.17 .47 21.33 .22 21.33 .33 21.33 .47 21.50 .22 21.50 .33 21.50 .47 21.67 .22 21.67 .34 21.67 .47 21.83 .22 21.83 .34 21.83 .47 22.00 .22 22.00 .34 22.00 .47 22.17 .23 22.17 .34 22.17 .47 22.33 .23 22.33 .34 22.33 .47 22.50 .23 22.50 .34 22.50 .47 22. 67 .23 22. 67 . 34 22. 67 . 47 n"l nn nn nn 23.00 .23 23.17 .23 23.33 .23 23.50 .23 23.67 .23 23.83 .23 24.00 .11 24.17 .00 24.33 .00 24.50 .00 24.67 .00 24.83 .00 25.00 .00 25.17 .00 25.33 .00 . J. UU ...i4 Z.J. UU 3 23.17 .34 23.17 .47 23. 33 . 34 23. 33 . 47 23.50 .34 23.50 .47 23.67 .34 23.67 .47 23. 83 . 34 23. 83 .4/ 24.00 .17 24.00 .24 24.17 .00 24.17 .00 24.33 .00 24.33 .00 24.50 .00 24.50 .00 24.67 .00 24.67 .00 24.83 .00 24.83 .00 25.00 .00 25.00 .00 25.17 .00 25.17 .00 25.33 .00 25.33 .00 DOWL ALASKA ENGINEERS TESTLAB COMPUTATIONS w.o. # Project Name Lt1Y'3 3 \\I s.i 1 Client Name CLi/IAN\ I k-.1 Date Prepared by: Sheet .3 of Checked by: Date _____.1__ .i____; . __p., 1 c .\.7.,A Ai.:2._ .-.; ._i'l "7".'■Z.12. .C.--- , 72.N11,■/\/. 1 K. 7i, 0 i !7;i :• _.,. ; ..1. _._i1• ____,;1, W _ . t : ! i f i i Ii • ! • I — . . _ . . 1 1 1 i ! ,' i — • - 1 -1 - ii_l,,f,i,,i,,1:1;1,,,,I!,,, 1 , , 7 , , 1 t i -;:: -7- ---- 7 -: I-1- -7----H---!-----1-----1---r---1----1---1--T---;--ii - I rI I I IM1 . 1r 40_11._ c • , : i ! - -. ---- - , t- _ '' 1 .--"•-- --1;t--11,--- ', , .--1 I -1-4I ----, ■ ---t, . ----;, , ----1 -1 • ; 1 ; ; ' 1 1 : • .. ' • . 1 I ; 1 r - - . , • . Vil ':; P :WZ (c)6_ s LI.I_c ;_ ..,N..-!-):__;;t=____1_t--7.1,_!.._4.,_d____ - : , 1, . • r - • ;- ; --i - 1 - ., ,i 111 •1 ! ! I i , 1 ; --r---, - I ' ; • ; 1- - . 7 i , I I : ' . ; ' I 1 i i-- 1 , ; ! 1 . 1 . . i • , 1,1t1111 r'-. !1:C::::.!'S ; r.:isz;--rj_ . , , .. , 1 , t : j I ' i ' • i 1 1 . ' 1 1 1 - 1 ' I • - ' ; i . . 1 , • , ; , I ] • • - i i ' ., 1 ' ' 1 ' I ! ! I 4 1 ; ' • ---1 H.LL CII W-LAti-He..1, 7;i. u 5 s_4;7... CD .. G .' 1 i .0.--Ai I . i , 1 ., . --;--- , 1 ! ; • ; 1 1 i • . -,. 1 ; , 1 1 =-- Z 1-!-G -, 0 ......1-= LS 1 Tc--.41 I -1 ; 1 r- • ._ i I 1. . 1 ...... . „. • . , • t i 1 41 1 I . • • . = 4--' 8 '-D. ..I.,;,t_•._ ........)-____T --A--. - t• _., ..., . ■ 1 : : , 3 1 ! 1 + • ; i i ---A - ; - 1 • , , . . I ; -- ; : • 1 : . .- -7-1-----; — i 1, I A 1 1 1 ; ; . - I I - -I- : ; 1 ! ! 1 d 1 1 1 1 i ; 1 ; - 1 - i L.-- 1 I I ' ' • 1 I I i . . i i I t ; i 1 —1- 1 I I 1 1 - : [ 1 T , - T — 1 1 1 1 i 1 i , i i I ; ; ; ; I 1 I ; _i_ . 1 , ---1 1 I ; 1 1 5 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS HYDROGRAPHS ROUTED THROUGH OLIENTION SYSTEM 4- 3- 2 - 0 l 1111 1 1 1 1 11111111111111111111 1.5 3.17 4.83 6.5 8.17 9.83 11.5 13.1714.83 16.5 18.1719.83 21.5 23.1724.83 1111 111111111 1 111 1/1111/11 11 1111 11111111111111111 1 1 111 111 1 � 1 HOURS SCS RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH USING KING COUNTY "HYD" PROGRAM CLIENT NAME: LARRY & SUZIE MC KINNEY PROJECT NAME: LARRYS NEW NO. 1 W.0.#: S11106 COMPUTER FILE: S11106D DATE: AUGUST 7, 1990 TITLE: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS HYDROGRAPHS ROUTED THROUGH DETENTION SYSTEM 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR PEAK= 1.78 PEAK= 2.47 PEAK= 4.9 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 No. STEPS 156 No. STEPS 156 No. STEPS 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 17 0 O. 17 0 O. 17 0 O. 33 0 O. 33 0 O. 33 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.02 0.67 0 0.67 0.01 0.67 0.06 0.83 0 0.83 0.04 0.83 0.11 1 O. 01 1 O. 06 1 O. 15 1.17 0. 03 1.17 0.09 1.17 0. 17 1.33 0.04 1!.33 O.1 1.33 0.2 1.5 0.05 1.5 0.12 1.5 0.22 1.67 0.07 1.67 0.14 1.67 0.26 1.83 0.09 1.83 0.17 1.83 0.31 2 O. 1 2 0. 2 2 0. 34 2.17 O. 11 2.17 0. 21 2.17 O. 35 2.33 O. 12 2.33 0.22 2.33 0.37 2.5 O. 13 2.5 0.24 2.5 0.38 2.67 0.15 2.67 0.26 2.67 0.42 2.83 0.17 2.83 0.3 2.83 0.47 3 0.18 3 0.32 3 0.49 3. 17 0.19 3. 17 0.33 3.17 0.5 3.33 0.2 3.33 0.33 3.33 0.51 3.5 0.2 3.5 0.34 3.5 0.52 3.67 0.22 3.67 0.37 3.67 0.56 3.83 0.25 3.83 0.41 3.83 0.62 4 0.26 4 0.42 4 0.65 4.17 0.26 4.17 0.43 4.17 0.65 4.33 0.27 4.33 0.44 4.33 0.66 4.5 0.27 4.5 0.45 4.5 0.67 4.67 0.29 4.67 0.48 4.67 0.72 A Aq n qq d R7 n /I n „ �o 5 0.33 5 0.55 5 0.81 5. 17 0.34 5. 17 0.55 5. 17 0.82 5.33 0.35 5.33 0.56 5.33 0.83 5.5 0.35 5.5 0.57 5.5 0.83 5.67 0.38 5.67 0.61 5.67 0.87 5.83 0.42 5.83 0.66 5.83 0.93 6 0.43 6 0.68 6 0.97 6.17 0.43 6. 17 0.68 6.17 0.99 6.33 0.44 6.33 0.69 6.33 1 6.5 0.44 6.5 0.69 6.5 1 6.67 0.51 6.67 0.8 6.67 1.09 6.83 0.62 6.83 0.91 6.83 1.25 7 0.64 7 0.98 7 1.36 7.17 0.72 7.17 1.06 7.17 1.48 7.33 0.86 7.33 1.22 7.33 1.64 7.5 1.03 7.5 1.48 7.5 1.95 7.67 1.48 7.67 1.99 7.67 2.76 7.83 1.78 7.83 2.46 7.83 4.9 8 1.72 8 2.47 8 2.22 8.17 1.38 8.17 2.13 8.17 2.2 8.33 0.98 8.33 1.77 8.33 2 8.5 0.71 8.5 1.46 8.5 1.82 8.67 0.63 8.67 1.2 8.67 1.65 8.83 0.49 8.83 0.89 8.83 1.41 9 0.46 9 0.67 9 1.18 9.17 0.47 9. 17 0.73 9.17 1.05 9.33 0.47 9.33 0.7 9.33 1.02 9.5 0.47 9.5 0.71 9.5 1.01 9.67 0.47 9.67 0.72 9.67 1.01 9.83 0.48 9.83 0.72 9.83 1.01 10 0.48 10 0.72 10 1.01 10.17 0.48 _ 10. 17 0.72 10.17 1.01 10.33 0.48 10.33 0.72 10.33 1.01 10.5 0. 48 10.5 0.72 10.5 1.02 10.67 0.45 j 10.67 0.68 10.67 0.98 10.83 0.4 10.83 0.6 10.83 0.9 11 0.39 11 0.58 11 0.84 11.17 0.39 11.17 0.59 11.17 0.82 11.33 0.39 11.33 0.59 11.33 0.83 11.5 0.4 11.5 0.59 11.5 0.83 11.67 0.4 11.67 0.59 11.67 0.83 11.83 0.4 11.83 0.59 11.83 0.84 12 0.4 12 0.59 12 0.84 12. 17 0. 4 12. 17 0. 59 12. 17 0. 84 12.33 0.4 12.33 0.6 12.33 0.84 12.5 0.4 12.5 0.6 12.5 0.84 12.67 0.37 12.67 0.55 12.67 0.78 12.83 0.33 12.83 0.48 12.83 0.67 13 0.32 13 0.47 13 0.65 13.17 0.32 13. 17 0.47 13.17 0.66 13.33 0.32 13.33 0.47 13.33 0.66 13.5 0.32 13.5 0.47 13.5 0.66 13.67 0.32 13.67 0.47 13.67 0.66 13.83 0.32 13.83 - 0.47 13.83 0.66 14 0.32 14 0.47 14 0.67 iii 1 7 fl -17 1. 1 7 fl d7 1 4 1 7 fl F.7 N N NN NN .NN NN NN NN Fa Fa' Fa Fa Fa F" Fa F" Fa F" Fa Fa Fa Fa Fa rr F' Fa 1-•r r W W NNNNN rrNrr OONOO iDW - • DiD ODCOFaCoCD N.1 Vr V V ODCTr(TCP CA in (11Cn )4 a, 4N W1- •NCbCn• WrNCOCT• WF• IN) CDO)• W1-•NCOCP• W►'rCDCP• WrrOOOD• WrrCDCP• WrrCO(P• WrrCDCT• CO WN1WWVCnWVNWV(nWVrWVU1WVOW VCnWVIDW VCnWV(pW VCACJV VW 'NJ CJIWVCDWVCnCO VCAWVCAW O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • N N N N N N tJ tJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N hi N N N N N N N N N N) tJ N N W L) W W W W CO CO W W W W W CO W W CO CO CO W W W W W W W W W W W W CO W W W W W W W W CO N N CT Co OD OD Cb Co Co (b CA Co CD OD r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W W NNNNN r r N ►-- r O O N O O LD (D - W up Co Co r CD CD V ■.) F- V CP CD r CD On CP Cn r CP Cn 4 4 F- 4 . . . • N • • • • r • . . . O . . . . tD . . . . J . • • CT • • • • Ul • • • • IA • W rNCD()• WrNCD CT) • WrNCO CI) • WrNCD0)• WrrCO(T• WrrCD(T• WrrCo0)• WrrCoCD• Wrr PCT• W W W W V Ul N/ W V Ul W V r W V (n CJ V o w Ul W V IO CO V CP CJ V Co W V Ul W V V W V Ul W NJ W V Ul W V Ul W V Ul W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • W W W W W CO W W W W W W CO W W W W W W W W W W W CO CO W G) CJ W CO CO W CO W CO CO W W W W aA 4 •A 41 aA 4 4 •A aA 4 •A aA aA aA aA •A iA 4 4 •A rA 41 rA 4A 4N 41 rA 41 4A 4 4 rA 4 aA 4 4 4 4/ 4 4 A 4A a 4 4 rA 4 4 4 4 4 W GJ 41 W N N N N N N N N N N (J CD V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N t•J r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W W NNNNN rrNrr OONOO UO D - DiD Cc ODF"c Co V Vr V V 0'1 CO - On. CD CnCn - Cnin 44F-4N • • • . N . . • . F• • • • • O • • • • iD a, V • • iA • W r N Co CT • CJ r N Co CP • W 1-• N Co CT • W r N CD CP • W r r CO Cr, • W r r CO CT ' CJ r r D3 DI • W r r CC CT • W r r CO CD ' W I W V W W V Un W V N W V U1 W V r GJ U1 W V O W V U1 W V W W V U1 W V Co W V .U1 W V V W V Cn W V CT W V Cn W V Cn W V in W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) O O G O O O O G O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aA aA •A 4 aA aA aA •A aA 4 4 aA 4 IA 4 4 4N aA 4 41 41 41 41 iA 4 4 4 as as A A 4 4 4 aA rA aA •A 4 (n in in (n in in U1 Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn CT (T O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V CO in up t0 t0 up up up CO CD CD CO LO 4 V -4' a' C'l 0 O • O O O N CO V' N Cr) lD a) N t'] N N N N V' V' NCI 0 COC9NO O • 0 0 0 N N ('1 • W N CI Cr) Cl N N V' a' N N NO N N --i 0 O • 0 0 0 N C7 r7' N 17' ID�Nr+i•i N • N NC'J NITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 16260 CU -FT iiOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER ©- MAX(cfs) .7 IA.= 6.67 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) IIIA.= .00 INCHES "O -ORF" IS CHANGED TO .007 CFS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MIN. ORIFICE OF 0.5" 'ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... TRIAL TANK - LENGTH STOR -AVAIL STOR -USED PK -STAGE PK- OUTFLOW I1 828.1 16260 4387 1.57 1.51 2 525.8 10323 3762 1.96 1.69 3 358.7 7043 3274 2.36 1.85 5 105.1 4029 LbU..s J. U0 L. 1L 6 168.9 3316 2373 3.37 2.21 ISER -HEAD TANK -DIAM STOR -DEPTH TANK - LENGTH STORAGE - VOLUME 5.00 FT 5.00 FT 5.00 FT 99.2 FT 1948 CU -FT IOUI3LE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: BOTTOM ORIFICE: DIA(INCHES) HT(FEET) Q-MAX(CFS) 6.67 .00 2.700 _'OUTING DATA: 5TAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU -FT) PERM- AREA(SO-FT) .00 .00 .0 .0 ILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ,PECI_FY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF /OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW /OUTFLOW ROUTINE PECIFY [d:)[pathlfilenameC.ext] OF ROUTING DATA LARRYHYD. RT DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N)? NTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ARRYDEV. 2 INFLOW /OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: diPEAK - INFLOW(CFS) PEAK - OUTFLOW(CFS) 2.23 1.78 INITIAL- STAGE(FT) TInE- OF- PEAK(HRS) .00 7.83 OUTFLOW - VOL(CU -FT) 29108 PEAK - STAGE- ELEV(FT) 2. 17 IPEAK STORAGE: 810 CU -FT ENTER [ d : ] [path ] f i lename C . e :tit) FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: IARRYHYD. 2 ILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? ` Y . ,PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE r IINTER Cd:]Cpath.)filename[.ext) OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ARRYDEV.10 INFLOW /OUTFLOW ANALYSIS:' PE -AK- INFLOW(CFS) PEAK - OUTFLOW(CFS) 3.43 2.47 PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE r_ INTER Cd:][path]filename[.ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: LARRYDEV.100 INFLOW /OUTFLOW ANALYSIS: PEAK - INFLOW(CFS) 4.90 PEAK - OUTFLOW(CFS) 4.90 INITIAL - STAGE(FT) TIME- OF- PEAK(HRS) OUTFLOW- VOL(CU -FT) 62877 PEAK - STAGE- ELEV(FT) ENTER [d:][pathJfilenameE.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: I' ARRYHYD. 100 ILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? 1 PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE dD O W L ALASKA ENGINEERS TEBTLAB COMPUTATIONS # S 1 1 i0c,. Protect Name L Q2.Q■( '5 N E\N Client Name GA.rat2so I/ EPP 11`1 Prepared by: 'D'1Z Date ar3 -°O Sheet I of Checked by: Date ice( 051 LL rfaA -1- l S\I∎1 (ColZa" RE.W'i CAz1- e. 2.1 A.. W.O. • 2YlZ .SZEL.EASI:. _QA`C .�LLN.?�EVELO�?ED, c-F s Yl = O�3 �... Fo2..5.1.�1�i v'�YA1.1G�1r- AND mAX MuM VEL- OG•`iY,. = M■ � L= Zob Fp2 wP:Ts2. suQ =P� S = Z • O. ° . FP... AcTt -t AL . 5. .F0 2 _..GOtJ V ��l t;LG�.. �r V Ck C11'v Q = AV 3A, 1 _...: U `S C . " R U R _ I . p..d�_ Q w,S. I�rz�A =_. ' 3�_ x .zoo> ;USE ,-- 1-1ttJ = l.' 0..33 Av 6 w i17( --fl dD O W L ALASKA ENGINEERS T E S T L AB COMPUTATIONS w.o. # S 1110G Project Name 2-Y I's tJ Gv/ No, Client Name GA2.1_So f F E 2Q1 I■L Sheet Z of Premed by: Date Checked by: Date ' i i- 7-T-; i — 7T!1N�.... �EF- OAS _ A % M/�xl.N. N4.� 40 vl._'RATE_! ' ; i , ' , i , --- ! i s i 23,0 i•; 1— r j 7 t i X486' I:_.__.�._ • . .__ -__ ► �__. -..- _? 3,_03_x.0 ,oZ?- 0,1._47. 4t:.83. ;3S t i ? V c i t '— I ! : io3 - f- - - -_. - - -?- - --- - - - - -- ____I__-_-_i i • _ . ,— X1.;0 -l.l S H A..L.1.-.. lis. 1.t_t� _ ;F Lam_ W --h c - 1..lR1 C. _LI 'D.- 0_,_.O -' - F.T2E .-1- CA2t , I I -r - r i • , I i ; t I i i ! i j I i —! ( I + 1 - • i I i t t ] }, i I i I t , j • I i i i � ! 1- (_ • k i j ' j I- ; - —' --3 1 I 1.- L' 1 , I I I 1 ■ i J ; C i t , I I—'i k j j ! i!I ! 1 1 — 1 j I , ! 1 ` i j i --i— I t 7 i ! —� t i 1 j i i i i i t i i i � L I ( - +_ t } 33, 1 I ! —Y ! i i iH_ f j t tl i - ri I t ! j k t i' —. �_ /,. i. ., i! t. : 1 r ! i i i i i ' 4I . . I '. , r i 11 i i ( r___ i !! _ i 1! I j i I. Ii i i, CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN D of g._; wi 0 11P . 5 87'33'33• E BASS OF �44 r S. 144th STREET tP HP 2Q53.80 PUT 2632.44 6CCS 2632.03 1IEAS // r 778.11 Pw et- TM:MED mmlim7>i/1 1e�w�a.�!��r.ecrsrvsrVo L S. 146th STREET • 00(1660600 • ,4(441:444-ex Nn10tiic01tn0 co co 00000 —•000 - (, 1i u u 1( it it 11. a II • 446000.1 -(9-^r I() - ll� ,d4444444d ' -- c u) U 111111 Di IA • Q 4 x4444 N,0 , 1 : , sZ) 2, I V, - .6.::,ii I ; t 1 1 1 ( , 1 I ', i ; '5-,:pi,S7DI -I I' , ., __4 L 0.0:4_Z_I = S1■1) • gi 1 -1 ...; e , 1 t i , , , ;____. 1 Ns, ,:i : I , 1 I 4N, I , I 1 ; ; , , 1 , 4 4 1 7 , .1'. , ! i , .-li , ' I ' i i ! - t -1: r --1 •di-1.-10,1.-z -5 !I- ; <A? I 31, M2) 1 iap„?..1 41 olii• 1. • ; awa :Lq pavatip -- laaqs oq,)s'i nUa q pandaia ta tzta-71-toiatcl saniN Juan 9011t5" #v•Ai SNOLLVIrldIA103 • IN )."Zrecil 311111N1 Parma El V "I J. 13 a 1 aldlIONIONE VNBV1V "IMO 0 Pr ENTER JUNC NO. 2: OVERFLOW-ELEV, E(deg), STRUC.DIA /WIDTH(ft), Q -RATIO 316.20,0,4,.39 IIENTER PIPE # 3: LENGTH(ft), DIA(in), PIPE -TYPE, OUTLET- E, INLET -IE, INLET -TYPE 161,12,2,307.89,310.40,2 ENTER JUNC N0. 3: OVERFLOW-ELEV, BEND- ANGLE(deg), STR(1C.DIA /WIDTH(ft), 0-RATIO 1319' 45, 4, . 05 ENTER PIPE % 4: LEN6TH(ft), DIA(in), PIPE -TYPE, OUTLET -IE, INLET -IE, INLET -TYPE 60,12,2,310.40,312,2 '_ INFLOW CONDITIONS PIPE N0. 4 - OVERFLOW DATA AND UPSTREAM VELOCITY DATA: 1) ENTER: OVERFLOW -ELEV, OVERFLOW -TYPE (NONE =O, BROAD- WEIR =1, SHARP- WEIR =2) ' 314.80, 0 2) SPECIFY TYPE OF VELOCITY DATA INPUT: S - SINGLE VELOCITY UPSTREAM V - VARY VELOCITY ACCORDING TO V=0/A S **************** OVERFLOW ENCOUNTERED AT 4.44 CFS DISCHARGE ******I*** * *** *** PIPE N0. 3: 161 LF - 12°CMP @ 1.56% OUTLET: 307.89 INLET: 310.40 INTYP: 2 JUNC N0. 3: OVERFLOW -EL: 319.00 BEND: 45 DE6 DIA /WIDTH: 4.0 Q- RATIO: .05 G13 # 8 100 YEAR .29 .33 310.73 * .024 .23 .24 .40 .40 .24 .33 .29 A L� A� 4.1444‘--1/4(S 4 .58 .48 310.88 * .024 .32 .34 .57 .57 .34 .48 .42 .87 .59 310.99 * .024 .40 .42 .72 .72 .42 .59 .53 Z5 pfL 1.16 .69 ' 311.09 * .024 .46 .49 .87 .87 .49 .69 .62 1 00 YE .R 1.45 .77 311.17 * .024 .52 .56 1.37 1.37 .56 .77 .70 1.74 1.03 311.43 * .024 .57 .63 2.23 2.23 .95 1.03 .78 2.03 2.64 313.04 * 024 .61 .71 3.26 3.26 2.54 2.64 .86 '2.32 4.40 314.80 * .024 .66 .79 4.45 4.45 4.27 4.40 .93 2.61 6.40 316.80 * .024 .70 1.00 5.79 5.79 6.23 6.40 1.00 2.90 8.60 319.03 * .024 .74 1.00 7.29 7.29 8.42 8.63 1.08 ,* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** OVERFLOW ENCOUNTERED AT 2.90 CFS DISCHARGE *** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PIPE NO. 4: 80 LF - 12 °CLAP @ 2.00% OUTLET: 310.40 INLET: 312.00 INTYP: 2 cm:05 T= 31¢,80 Z5 QUO YcP\TZ (,- '3Act&wc -V €R- A4P(Y5t5 7 8 9 SPECIFY TYPE OF PIPE = DATA :INPUT A - _(EYBOARD' F..- 10 11 12 k ENTER: NUMBER OF PIPES 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 OUTFLOW CONDITIONS PIPE NO. 1 - TAILWATER DATA: 1) SPECIFY IYPE OF TAILWATER DATA INPUT: 5 - SINGLE TW -ELEV. 19 20 21 22 23 24 2) ENTER: TW -ELEV 307.68 F TW /HW --DATA FILE, 25 26 . t*INPUT.PIPE DATABEGINNING :WITHDOWNSTREAM'PIPE'ANDWORK BACKtt 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ROUND /ARCH PIPE INPUT CODING INFORMATION: PIPE TYPE CODING I - CONCJSMOOTH BORE (n=0.012) 2 CORRUGATED METAL (n=0.024) «.. 3 - HELICAL CMP Ln-fac Ya[ke i'` 4 - CMP ARCH (OLD GEOMETRY) 37 38 39 CMP':ARCH (NEW GEOMETRY) 6•- CONC /SMOOTH ARCH (OLD). 7 - 'CONCLSMOOTH_ARCH (NEW.) 8 - ROUND (user sets n -fac) ARCH PIPE CODING - DUIVALENT ROUND SIZE MUST BE INPUTTED PER FOLLOWINLIABL.E: EOUIV -DIAM, OLD- ARCH' NEW -ARCH t ` EOUIV- DIAM.`"` OLD -ARCH -NEW- ARCH 40 41 42 15' 18 °X 11' 17'X 13° t 42° 50'X131' 49 °X 33' 18' 2.211_3° 21 °X.13' t 48° 58'X 36' 51'X38'- 21' 25'X 16° 24 °X 18° t 54° 65 °X 40' 64 °X 43' 24' 29 °X 18' 28 °X 20° t 602 72 °X 44° 71 °X 47° 30° 36 °X 22° 35 °X 24° t 66 79 °X 49° 77 °X 52 43 44 45 46 47 48 36' 43 °X 27° 42 °X 29° 72° 85 °X 54' 83'X 57° INLET TYPE CODING: 1 - CMP /PROD. 4 - CP SOCKET /PROJ. 7 - CMAP /PROJ. 2 - CMP /HDWALL 5 - CP SO.EDGE /HDWALL 8 - CMAP /HDWALL 3 - CMP /MITER 6 - CP SOCKET/WALL 9 - CMAP /)TITER 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ENTER PIPE # 1: LEN6TH(ft),'DIA(in), PIPE -TYPE 65,18,2,382.48,383.62,2 18 - OTHER (SEE. FHWA REPORT OUTLET -IE, INLET -IE HAS NO.5) ENTER JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW -ELEV, BEND- AN6LE(deq) 310,0,2,,73 STRUC.DIA /WIDTH(ft), O -RATIO ENTER PIPE # 2: LEN6TH(ft), DIA(in) 65,18.2.303.62.304.84,2 PIPE -TYPE, OUTLET -IE, INLET -IE, INLET -TYPE ENTER JUNC. NO. 2: OVERFLOW -ELEV, BEND- ANSLE(deq), STRUC.DIA/WIDTH(ft), O-RATIO ENTER E 4 EN6 Hrt . 'iNit -TYPE. ..'1! LL -IE. INLE -IE. INLE 11E.1 ._.305.34.211.2 INFLOW CONDITIONS PIPE NO. 3 - OVERFLOW DATA AND UPSTREAM VELOCITY DATA: 1) ENTER: OVERFLOW -ELEV, OVERFLOW -TYPE (NONE =0, BROAD - WEIR :1, SHARP - WEIR =2) 7,11 0 2' SPECIFY TYPE OF VELOCITY DATA INPUT: E - SINGLE VELOCITY UPSTREAM - VARY VELOCITY ACCORDI 6 TO V =14/ A 3) ENTER: VELOCIT f sl UPSTREAM 5 ENTER: PIN, QMA7, QINCRE, PRINT - OPTION (STANDARD :1, CONDENSED :2, EXPANDED :3) 3.3 25 PIPE NO. 1: b5 LF - 13' l4F' _i 0 r : : 2 C� 1.8.. OUTLET; 3?2,40 INLET 303.61 INT'iP• JIUNC Nei. OVER, Lu 10.0 BEND: T /E ! 2.0 1 -r-1�� r 4 "i4 - €t: t..;0 BECdi: 1 DEG D:A .d.DTH:...0 ;�- RATIO: i3 O(CFS) i )FT; HW ELEV. t :'1 -F 4L DC ON TW D0 DE HWO HWI IttttttltittltttttIttlttttlliltttltttlItttttttttttttttttltlttltttitltttllttttlt .27 4.0" =07,69 t .024 .19 .14 5.23 5.28 4.07 1.07 .53 4.07 307.35 t .324 . .26 5.23 5.28 4.07 4.0) .34 . -5 4.08 307.70 t .024 .33 .32 5.28 5.28 4.07 4.08 .42 1.00 4.09 307.71 1 .024 .38 .37 5.28 5.28 4.08 4.09 .49 1.25 4.10 307.72 t .024 .42 .41 5.28 5.28 4.03 4.10 .56 1.50 4.12 307.74 t .024 .46 .45 5.28 5.28 4.11 4.12 .62 1,75 4.15 307.77 t .024 .50 .49 5.28 5.25 4.12 1.15 .6 ..30 4.17 307.'/9 ; .024 .52 5.28 5.23 4.14 4.17 .73 1.25 4.20 307.82 I .324 .5' .5t 5.28 5.28 4.16 4.20 . .8 5 4.24 i 5 i 1 , 2• < Z,50 4.•4 307.86 I .3.4 >okl .54 5.28 5.25 4.•9 4.24 .L� u-- ..-5 4.27 307.89 t .024 .63 .-..,2 5.28 5.28 4.11 4.27 .88 t O C' v Wit, K 3.00 4.31 307.93 I .024 .6.5 .65 5.28 5,28 4.24 4.31 .92 PIPE N0. 2: 65 LT- - 18'CNP` 0 1.88'; OUTLET: 303.x2 INLET: :04.64 lair 2 JUNG NO. 2: OVERFLOW -EL: 309.00 BEND: 90 DEG DIA /WIDTH: 2.8 0-RATIO: 3.20 0 (CFS HW(FT) HW ELEV. t N -FAQ DC DN TW DO DE HWO NWI Ittlittllltlitlltttt ltlttlllttlltlltltlltltttitittlitlttittlttlltt ttltttlttitlt .14 2.86 307.70 t .024 .14 .15 4.07 4.07 2.86 2.86 .17 .29 2.85 307.69 t .024 .20 .20 4.07 4.07 2.85 2.85 .25 .43 2.86 387.70 t .824 .25 .25 4.08 4.88 2.86 2.86 .32 .58 2.88 387.72 t .824 .29 .28 4.09 4.09 2.87. 2.88 .37 .72 2.90 307.74 t .024 .32 .31 4.10 4.10 2.89 2.90 .42 .37 2.93 307.77 t .024 .35 .34 4.12 4.12 2.92 2.73 .46 1.01 2.96 307.80 t .824 .38 .37 4.15 4.15 2.95 2.96 .50 1.16 3.00 387.84 t .024 .41 .40 4.17 4.17 2.98 3.00 .54 1.30 3.84 307.88 i .824- .43 .42 4.20 4.28 3.02 3.04 .58 1.45 3.88 307.92 t .024 .46 .44 4.24 4.24 3.06 3.08 .62 1.59 3.14 387.98. t .824 .48 .46. 4.27 4.27 3.18 3.14 .65 \ ,C) 1.73 3.19 308.03 t .024 .50 .49 4.31 4.31 3.15 3.19 .69 PIPE NO. 3: 118 LF - 12 *CMP 0 4.807. OUTLET: 305.34 INLET: 311.00 INTVP: 2 0(CFSI HWIFT;t HW ELEV. t !I -FAC DC DH TW DO DE HWO HWI Iltlttttlttiltltlttttttlttttii# tiItltlttitltlttttttlttttltlitttttltittttttEltt .0 .08 311.06 t .824 09 .W . 6 2.36 GT✓a C) .10 .17 .17 .17 .21 24 .21 .17:6 :17 .31 .23 .34 .38 .26 .41 2,11.10 .024 ;13 2.38 2.38 .16 ittli 311.17 t ;0.24 .14 2.40 2.40 .17 mit .14 .4 .! 2.43 titii .16 311.21 .024 .21 .i7 ..:1 wit .17 311.22 .024 .22 .1E1 2.50 2.50 .12 WU .18 311.23 t• .024 .23 .19 2.54, 2.54 .22 taut .1,9 111.25- t .024 .25 .20 2.58 2.58 .25 vim .20 311.26 t .024 .26 .21 2.64 2.64 .26 X& .21 311.27 t .i324 .27 .22 2.69 2.69 ..27 tiU .22 )AC 1\--7,---..1.1) At_ 5 SPECi R - REVISF, - NPW;;OB, F FiL. 8 - STOP VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES N/A VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS N/A VIII. OTHER PERMITS N/A IX. EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN /o.2 („ lc) 5'7 tito 1(1,3) 3 • 3 3( /5 7-.nr. ,E..73q71 r" 5- C 1 t LT /c.f. ; 41- , 4 72 4, 4, 1-2 e 7 I 1/ 3 0 • ri leo/ i4L )64 lie". 2.7 cv (We (r/t AC/C/ l'e/i/i1A"N (7/3? el° re i.e, 4"- r' • ri 3 t 71(1 A .4ic/ jo . 61 / /if r/ei /./ 4:1104. r)// rArf7e )16..29[6 V.295.. LFrL'CAW VICINITY MAP. ii mu 30 .. Nv 30 e M' 110ARYJ101LE NEW CA,VSZTIRCE L , A =IAYI■MM FiXAV III' rmreAAA'E./AA' gm 1 -- I 9ALRB \��. 1 ddill M EA C { I� 20 81'- S2C2 .... ± ± CS \ TDO wLL A.32SpO s.ft Rot 3 6.9CRAOE E.,1.7O= 5 L w�. .9ORAyE...321.60 • SSpinal! Roadway m . W fea..r F6...ro1 A ce oM.. u.J231`. • ,.39.0 1 ASPHALT PAVING' I .. UNPAVED AREA - _ .•• s 91 69 44 EASING COaY RE )69.14 ' • TW wALL.12. 66 • ASPHALT PAYING. MADE E.322 Be .. M. _ ...- GRADE 0.32223 _.. .... FOUR .STOR. APARTJJENT BLDG ]n 9e a.DwEA L -ul -9e -- 'N 01'09'40' E 156 84' 5 01.09'40" .W .. .. J oFA 3w µ, - [ JJ2 GRADE E -3w e [RAIL 0.3.2.1. ASPHALT. PAVING tl1ADE ..3.2.24 • . D*A1LEIT 1PAREP LEGEND 00880 _BAT[16pE Q rwE 0.00243 As v4W • wAIER 0410 — 5 — 54.1220 W p 9441TAR1*E+0* 460201[ — m — croft 0R■•• 62:90 2401 CAM. BABB Moo.• r0a Non w0T AFL, LE -- • _ _ - - LILE ua /0085201 LLI o L,ONT Dr1 ROLE . - 0lti 0OL 3D0.1.O41 .nit it 0000014 — �; 15[102.0.4 REDEVA - D CAS .nit rpOE CO,OUa U E v MOIL ALL WORK AND 001ERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE QTY OF 1124[X12 STANDARD PUNS.. AND 00104 , THE 190 STANDARD SPEC:SCA 0243 FOR ROAD. BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL.' CONSTRUCTION. 124E WIN AMA AMENDMENTS TO DME10N ONE AND THE STANDARD.. BANS AS PLTBUSHED BY ME WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE AMERICAN PUBLJO WORKS 2580021124 EXCEPT FOR MEASUREMENT AND. RAYNQIT. SHOULD ANY CONR3CT OCCUR THE 01Y OF T1N09M STANDARDS 20101 DETABS SHALL TA2E PRECEDENCE OWNER: 0ARR2 MrA?NAWFY n S MAW SP-4774C, ..w 98/00 • EARTHWORK QCIAN)T /ES CUT • Z{000 CU ✓OS %(,L • 7,000 Cu 101 RF 901 OA LARRY'S MARKET PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH 8 SOUTH 144TH ST , GRADING & EROSION CONTROL 'PLAN • DDWL • N O I MID MAIM Q.ECRED 80- NOld .: SCALE: 17.0. . .5 M106 1 201 -85 w.0. GRID FILE NO. X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/ DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT King County Building and Land Development Division COMMERCIAL /MULTIFAMILY GROUP BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET Page 1 of 2 I l I Date: _. j BALD Project No.: I Project Name: j Site Address: Fill in those items which pertain to this project and return to the Commercial /Multifamily Group - Site Development Review Unit. Unit Price Unit j Quantity Price I PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS A.C.Pavement $ 8.00 SY j S Cement Conc. Curb 8 Gutter . 9.00 LF ( S Extruded Asphalt Curb 2.50 Lf S Concrete Sidewalk 9.00 LF ( S 6" pipe 7.50 Lf j S 8" pipe 10.00 LF 1 S 12" pipe 15.00 LF j S. 15" pipe 16.00 LF ( S 18" pipe 20.00 LF j S 24" pipe 26.00 LF S 36" pipe 30.00 LF j S 48" pipe 50.00 LF S 60" pipe 65.00 LF i S 72" pipe 80.00 LF S Curb Inlet 500.00 EA. S CB TYPE 1 & 1-L . . . . . 750.00 EA. 5 CB TYPE II - 48" 1400.00 EA. S CB TYPE II - 54" 2100.00 EA. S CB TYPE 11 - 72" 3400.00 EA. S CB TYPE II - 96" 4000.00 EA. S Restrictor /Separator. 12" • 450.00 EA. S Restrictor /Separator 15" 500.00 EA. S Restrictor /Separator 18" • 600.00 EA. S Restrictor/Separator 24" • 750.00 EA. S Fencing (around pond) 10.00 LF S Riprap 30.00 CY S Rockery, Gabion & ecology wall 7.00 SF S Concrete Retaining Wall . . . 8.00 SF S Excavation for Pond 5.00 CY S Infiltration Trench 15.00 LF S Flow Spreader 15.00 LF S Trench Drain 15.00 LF $ Trash Rack 100.00 EA. S Detention Pipe Riser 400.00 EA. S PRIVATE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS S S S Quantity Price S S S S S 5 S S r s ! L.0 S s S S S "P. r. s' S S S S S S S S S S S S S $ S S s 4c S S S SUBTOTAL : S SUBTOTAL : 1/90 BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET King County Building and Land Development Division Commercial /Multifamily Group Unit Price Unit Silt Fence S 3.00 LF Seeding /Mulch 3000.00 ACRE Temporary Pond 5.00 CY Standpipe 200.00 EA. CB Interim Protection 25.00 EA. Quarry Spatl /Rip -rap 30.00 CY Rock Construction Entrance 300.00 EA. Pipe (/ % inch dia.) /_..; LF EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES Quantity Price s 271 12- s 'o f S $ S S s $ SUBTOTAL : S 4/-1:7S page 2 of 2 Signature: Firm Name: Telephone No.: e r, The following information will be completed by the King County Site Development Review Unit. #8:BOWDSHEE.WPF 11/25/1989 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS: PRIVATE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL : S s 3114 -7� SUBTOTAL : 20% CONTINGENCY : S 7, ,`3 i 1 I TOTAL BOND AMOUNT : Sil RIGHT -OF -WAY BOND : S 1190 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL RETENTION /DETENTION SUMMARY SHEET Development L- A1ziZY tS t\\ t;W No , I Date 8 • 14 •' Location SW G (1)2N.2 5. 144' ET', 0 \Fl v•\,/ AN' .O14.7.1..4 ENGINEER Name NuGH 1<uype_2 Firm \i\ N t.a2 S Address 15Z�3 Nt; �0� s'r21GT Phone (ZOG.) g6 S' -ZERO • Developed Site S acres • Number of Detention Facilities On Site • Detention provided in regional facility (—I Regional Facility location f\ fA • No detention required Acceptable receiving waters • Downstream Drainage Basins Number of Lots DEVELOPER Name L A2.2Y Su s 1'1= l<1 `\A 1•' l �i Firm Address sZ S rl� C'; k C SE47`11:" } \n/l� �811Z Phone (Z c��� 24.3 --ZS ; 1 N/A Immediate BasinA E= X15T \NC sToz , Basin B Basin C Basin D Major Basin "b u\t\I M l s (-; S1 V C f? Drainage Basin(s) Onsite Area Offsite Area Type of Storage Facility Live Storage Volume TOTAL INDIVIDUAL BASIN A= B C D -er' -rP'N I� t t `-4 Predeveloped Runoff Rate Postdeveloped Runoff Rate Developed Q 2 year 10year 100 year 2year 10 year 100 year 2. 1 3, -15 4 , 83 • 2.2� 3-43 4 . C7 Type of Restriction Size of Orifice/Restriction Orifice/Restriction 0 0 0 0 0 o R (Ft cE 6161 O.5 RD -1 1/90 DOWL ALASKA ENGINEERS TESTLAB COMPUTATIONS W.O. # \ 1 C)C. Project Name L.P,zzY's New No Client Name (N2 pat I14 43c. Prepared by: Sheet ( of / Checked by: Date ; ; i ! ' TT . i • . ! ! I , : 1 ' 1 ' ■ . . 1 1 1 ' , ! ; -..4 E. ("■74,..T.A _ LI , it.....L 4_ _1 _77 12!.... ts,...1_1.4..,_• ___t-- - ; - • --,-- t• - - -- -- -- --;--- , - - - is — ; -- • — - I- --- 1 , 1 ! ■ : i : 1 , • i - -- - 1 ; 1 i -1- -- ----t- - -,-----! --------1 i • - _ - __i_ — • , . • '1. --. -----' i 1 1 1 1 1 1 " I i 1 ! I 1 I 1 i 0 ! 1 1 1 1 1 I i I ; i l 71 j 1 1 r 1 1 _...i , . 1 . .__....t._...,__A -- 1--, - -1---,----1---- i 1 • 4._..i,=._t_. .____•_.._..1___ ___.:___ _MIA :2.1_--..uN:-__.1__IR.7_44.eR.. _`:___-=.1 ,..._, 1 _L • 1 •#,1 1 i _ 7----t° 4--1------,--- - - 1------- 4- - --r- • • ---I- • -- .• --i --- .J1._ ______ _t i i • f ; ' : i ! — I i I I 1 ' I 1 I ' ■ 1 i I I i 1 1 .;-, 4.7.- -.1.4.1•-,•- . I . ■ -I- - - : - --I - - - - -- - ____4__-4— 1 1.'• 1 i 1 ' 1 -.-I 1 11 / , i i ' ! 1 '-S11:K.IZ';1"11 .1.-%11a44 1 /N! 1 ■ 1 ! . 1 i i 1 1-1--L. - -- 1 -1--- 1 --1 •--- .--1,-. - ! -7-ii --.---- -- . . • I , i " 1 : __ • 1 1 . - . . ' 8 451.. I 1 ! , ' . ... _ _ .... 1 ■ 1 1----i - ' • . I_. _ 7 i t 4._ i 1 , , L ' : i . J I , , 1 1 , f---1-- -i I- , i 1 i 1 1 , i 1 - I. ! i i L L.,...____, It I , I , 1 ...._• 1----1 - !--- I. , • ---t- tT . I: t I IZ C 1 ,. . - -i I—FY1E Fa : - ., , 3 ' I E- 1--- • ' ■ , . 1 I . . ._ ..__L__- `,.. -4- -,i- -- :-.-1- -1-1-4 -I-92.(7)P --1-\.,1 li ri POs11-16L1 1 . I 1 - I 1- I - -I- r------ , • - ; . -, , 1 , t 1 {7 1 --1 - 1 _ i I I -t• --r- -r- ; ; i • I ! I , . ! ../. I I I _ _ .___ --4 _..._ 1 ! ! ! r - i -- ! ! ,..-- ,:. 1 I -7. I___ -1-7— -1 _ ,... r--/- i : i I ! . - -r ■ 1 7 1- I 1 I I . ' r I 1 .__ t 1 ' 1 . !_ i ; _ r ■ , , il —1 i i I : iiii 1 _ l' , i . 1 i --F---- . _ XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL DETENTION TANK Inspect detention vault at six (6) month intervals. Check access ladders, manhole rings an covers for cracking and /or corrosion, replace or repair damaged items. Check the flow restrictor structure for corrosion and to ensure the orifices are clear. Check sediment depth: if sediment accumulation is within six (6) inches of the lower orifice, clean the entire detention tank. Keep sediment and oil out of the downsteam channel. Check biofiltration swales for damage and erosion. Repair immediately. CATCH BASINS Inspect catch basins at six (6) month intervals. Check frames and grates for cracking, replace or repair damaged items. Clean catch basins when silt accumulation is within six (6) inches of the outlet pipe invert. SAFETY Conform to all local, state and federal regulations, ordinances and standards while involved in the daily maintenance and operation of the storm drainage system. APPENDIX A DOCUMENTS DEMONSTRATING NO TYPE I WETLANDS OR TYPE I OR II STREAM sensitive areas king county •r: a. FL. t ITTIM • ' x7. I d•,: Type V Unclassified • • ash., ...An P.." ' tr n ......_• vaspioqpr.i., ,,.... :.: - ries; .111. :' • -. -- --,, :-,. .: t • . F7.•-....Low- e.,!,‘"..C.e,da_ „fil_.r2 _. r.....,,r.c---..... int.' .111-'•, ...ilt._:-..1.1 . • i..--. •- 1 '-'-:2.-•‘.--:-:-- • --- r.). 1.: - - ' I:_lr_. 1 — _ . 7'4._ c • 1 :•- c " \ i!' • - . t • Duwomish 4