HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-18-91 - DOLLAR DEVELOPMENT - DOLLAR RENT A CARDOLLAR RENT -A -CAR
OFFICE ADDITION &
GAS PUMPS, CAR WASH,
PARKING STALLS &
SERVICE BAYS
15858 PACIFIC
HIGHWAY SOUTH
EPIC -18 -91
WAC 197 -11 -970
•
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal Construction encompassing approximately 3,825 square feet
will be established in a 24,000 square feet of existing structure. Gas pumps, a
car wash, 130 parking stalls and service bays will be erected on this site.
Proponent Dollar Development, Inc.
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 15858 Pacific Highway South,
Section 22, TWN 23, RGE 4E.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-18-91
1The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
XD There is no comment period for this DNS
This DNS is issued under 197- 11 - 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846
4ddress 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA. 88
)ate .,� lfp,r Signature
lou may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
3oulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
Ippeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
'equired to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
:
opies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
'tanning Department.
.M.DNS
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
•
April 29, 1991
Berry Metsker
Dollar Development
2460 76th Ave. S.E.
Mercer Island, Wa. 98040
PHONE # (206) 433.1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
RE: Dollar Development - Site Plan Approval at 15858 Pac Hwy S.
Dear Sir:
Public Works Department has reviewed and approves the subject site
plan for the roadway and utility site plan improvements per the
following comments and conditions:
Prior to beginning the site work the developer shall obtain the
following permits and meet the following conditions. As the
environmental process is incomplete, changes to site conditions
resulting from findings of environment shall also apply
retroactively. Call Denise Millard, Permit Coordinator at 431 -3672 to
have the following permits prepared for pickup:
1. Sidewalk, Channelization /Street Improvement Permit
(Permit Fee = $25.00)
Per our review of your April 3, 1991 letter, sidewalks were
determined to be required per the City of Tukwila's Sidewalk
Ordinance.
Approval of the final channelization plan shall be secured]
through WSDOT, SeaTac, Metro and Tukwila prior to issuance of
this permit for construction of sidewalks, street widening and
associated storm drainage and utility relocations. A typical
street section shall be identified for your proposed street
widening and sidewalks for Pac Highway /South 160th Street._
At the completion of channelization street improvement work, the
Development shall provide the following documents for turnover
to Tukwila (that portion in Tukwila) and SeaTac (that portion in
SeaTac) for acceptance of proposed public infrastructure. Included
in the turnover documents will be the following:
A. Letter from the Developer's representative requesting turnover
of proposed public facilities within the City of Tukwila
addressed to the Public Works Director, attention Phil Fraser.
(A like letter to SeaTac for proposed public infrastructure
turnovers to the City of SeaTac is appropriate).
B. As -built plans.
C. Sign -off permits for appropriate facilities per public
standards from City of SeaTac and City of Tukwila and WSDOT
approval of as- builts.
D. Bill of Sale.
E. List of materials.
F. Right -of- way /easements executed by property owner, unrecorded,
with signatory for acceptance of right -of -way and easements by
the Mayor, City Clerk and City Attorney.
G. One year Maintenance Bond for proposed public facilities
as part of this turnover dated from commencement from date
of letter and request for acceptance by the City.
These documents shall be provided prior for request for C of 0
by the development. Please note that the Tukwila Mayor /City
Council is the sole authority for acceptance of easements
and proposed public infrastructure improvements.
2. Storm Drain Permit (Permit Fee = $25.00)
A new manhole structure shall be provided at intersection of
existing 30" pipe and new 8" storm.
3. Landscape Irrigation Permit (Permit Fee = $25.00)
Four (4) sets of Landscape Irrigation Plans shall be provided via
the Permit Coordinator for City review prior to issuance of this
permit. On plan please identify the irrigation system, coverage
and deduct meter (if appropriate), and DSHS approved backflow
prevention device.
Also, the applicant is referred to the City of SeaTac for
appropriate approvals and street use /curb cut /access permits, for all
public infrastructure and roadway improvements in South 160th Street
and Pac Highway South located within the City of SeaTac.
Please complete the enclosed copy of the Non - Residential Sewer Use
Certification, return a copy to Val Vue Sewer District and forward a
copy to Metro. Metro will use this information to determine
late- comers charges for this development.
The applicant is referred to Water District # 125 and Val Vue Sewer
District for appropriate approvals /permits for sewer and water
systems. The applicant is referred to other City departments with
regards for approvals for fire, planning and building requirements.
And finally the applicant is referred to Metro with respect to Metro
bus shelter which will be placed in private property by easement and
other Metro design criteria.
The channelization plan shall be based on the enclosed April 5, 1991
letter from WSDOT and other requirements of WSDOT through their
letter from WSDOT and other requirements of WSDOT through their
review and final approval of your channelization plan for Pac
Highway.
If any new or upgrades to electrical telecommunications or TV cable
is required, all work shall be undergrounded per the City of
Tukwila's Undergrounding Ordinance.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please call me at
433 -0179.
Sin -rel
P i1 Fraser, Senior Engineer
Public Works Department
xc: Permit Coordinator
Darren Wilson
WSDOT
City of SeaTac - Don Monahan
Val Vue - Terry Matleich
Water District 125 - Frank Pearson
Metro
Greg Villanueva
Enclosures
PF /amc:B5:dollar2
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
TO: Jack Pace
FROM: Phil Fraser
DATE: April 9, 1991
SUBJECT: Dollar Development - Environmental Review
PHONE # /2061433.1800
M E M O R A N D U M
Gary L. VanDasen. Mayor
Public Works Department has reviewed the Dollar Development in the
field. The City has requested Dollar Development provide input with
regards to past, current and potential tenent improvements with
respect to Sidewalk Ordinance. Also the City has met with the
Developer and SeaTac (Don Monohan) last week with regards to
requirements of SeaTac relative to sidewalk improvements.
Per the City's field review the following ped safety analysis is
offered:
A. No sidewalk system exists adjacent to Dollar Development on
public right -of -ways it fronts - South 160th Street and
Pacific Highway South.
B. Metro bus stop fronts Development on Pac Hwy.
C. Citizens of Tukwila have reported for public record ped
safety problems in terms of access to the City Council
meetings with respect to lack of sidewalks and pedestrian
access fronting Dollar Development in recent past.
D. Pac Hwy and South 160th do not have adequate spacing between
Dollar Development and roadway to allow for separated ped
travelway from vehicular traffic.
E. Peak work traffic observed traveling at 35 - 50 MPH
F. This route allows for some school children access to school
route.
Per the above reasoning, ped safety is an issue. Public Works
has met with Developer 4/4/91 and per the 4/$/91 letter attached, the
City's Sidewalk Ordinance is activated. Dollar Development has
provided sidewalks and Metro bus access on their site plans.
A water analysis is required to assure adequacy of fire protection.
All other issues have been resolved. PF /amc:B5:Dollar
MILLEGA JADDI INC. ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS
1700 Westlake Avenue North • Suite 700 • Seattle • Washington 98109
Tel: (206) 285 -9650 FAX: (206) 282-7940
8 April 1991
City, of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA. 98188
Subject: Dollar Rent -a -Car on Pacific Hwy So. & South 160th
RECEIVED
CITY OP TI U(WIl A
APR 1 1 191
PERMIT CENTER
The existing building roof and site paving areas are not altered to generate the
increase of storm drainage flow. The site is presently paved and slopes to the
south. The storm water flow is thus guided to a landscaped swale along the
south property line. As such, any further repair work and or alterations to the
existing storm drainage, a new storm water detension system is not required. The
existing catch basins are relocated into this landscape strip and provided with
new oil trap.
If you need additional information please feel free to contact Mr. Johnny
Bermudez at 285 9650.
MILLEGAN JADDI, INC.
Ahmed M. Jaddi, P.E.
Joseph J. Millegan, P.E. Ahmed M. Jaddi, P.E.
C. Richard Williams, R.A. William H. Jordan, A.I.A.
MILLEGKN JADDI INC. ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS
1700 Westlake Avenue North • Suite 700 • Seattle • Washington 98109
Tel: (206) 285 -9650 FAX: (206) 282 -7940
5 April 1991
City of Tukwila
Department of Public Works
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA. 98188
Attn: Mr. Phil Fraser
Subject: Dollar Rent -a -Car on Pacific Hwy So. & 160th
RECEIVED
CITY OF TI IKWILA
APR 1 1 1991
PERMIT CENTER
The existing 30" Diameter storm drain line is located under the existing building.
The existing building roof structure is supported on concrete pilons which are
located within two feet of north property line. The existing building on the
adjacent property to the north encroaches on the subject property. These
existing conditions prevent relocation of existing storm drain line outside the
building.
Furthermore, the existing storm drainage serves the subject property and only a
portion of pavement from the south. We therefore, recommend that the existing
storm drainage line not be relocated.
A 15" diameter pressure sewer runs acrosa this property from south 160th street
to the north. This line also cannot be relocated for reasons cited above.
However, the Owner is advised to provide a 15 foot wide utility easement to the
Sewer District along this existing line.
Thank you for your approval of the enclosed site {Ian. We are forwarding the
design drawings to the City of SeaTac, Metro, WASHDOT, Water District #125
Sewer District for their review and approval.
Sincerely,
MILLEGAN JADDI, INC.
Ahmed M. Jaddi, P.E.
cc: Dollar Rent -a -Car
Joseph J. Millegan, P.E. Ahmed M. Jaddi, P.E.
C. Richard Williams, R.A. William H. Jordan, A.I.A.
[JOLLA
DEVELOPMENT CO.
April 3, 1991
Phil Fraser
Senior Engineer
Public Works
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Pre - application file # 013 -91 for Dollar Development Co.
Project located at 15858 Pacific Hwy. South.
Dear Phil:
Pacific Northwest Headquarters
2460 76th. Avenue S.E.
Mercer Island, WA 98040
(206) 236 -2439
RECEIVED
CITY C?E T(IKW(LA
APR 1 1 191
PERMIT CENTER
As requested, I have outlined the projected accumulative project cost for the Dollar
Rent A Car project located at above reference location. The project cost include all the
improvements under the existing tenant improvements permit and those being proposed.
The estimated project cost is as follows:
Interior Improvements $125,000
Canopies 20,000
Landscaping, parking, and sidewalks 15,000
Exterior building improvements 20,000
Gas pump 20,000
Car wash 5.000
Total:
$205,000
The assess value for the improvement per the 1991 real estate tax assessment is $338,100.
The total assess value including land is $824,200.
If you need any additional information in determine the sidewalks requirements for the
project, please contact me at 236 -2439.
Sincerely,
arry S.M: er
/th
ENVIRONNIIPTAL REVIEW
OUTING FORM
ITY OF TUKWILA
!PARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
' ; ■ ••• ::*
rof JSufk1in9 , Planning Pub Wks
•
IOJECT :D1v410
EPIC: —/Y-W
)DRESS /5-e6--g Aae/6e ,1
4,TE TRANSMITTED
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .#0-
"AFF COORDINATOR "9/edez2- .) /6,19-7 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The ettOchectenVii*Orimental cheaClist. was received regarding fliid project. Please. anc
comment below tciadvise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination,;.;.: ThO '
...environmental review file Is available in the Planning Department through the abOVe. st
•
coordinatOr.. Comments regarding.the project you wish carried to the Planning*Commiss
.
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
. .
. . . .
TEM
COMMENT
ate:
Comments prepared by: 2
°solves
ENVIRONNVTAL REVIEW
UTING FORM
!TY OF TUKWILA
'PARTMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
audg Pannng 1)4:16 WKs
IOJECT _27w7 -0 P/
)DRESS
1/4TE TRANSMITTED r
e 5.
'AFF COORDINATOR
EPIC: —/6/-*/
)..
Police-
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental cheaclist. was received regarding this project.; Please review an
. .
*comment botow to .advise the responsible official regarding the threshold .determination.; Tho'
envIronmental review file Is available in the Planning Department throLigh the above Staff -
coordinator., Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the planning Commission, ?"',
.Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted In the comment section below,
•
TEM
COMMENT
Sk4 datce4/4.4, a4e.,40tileze,4
ate: 1-4 1/ Comments prepared by:
011114/09
ITY OF TUKWILA
FPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
IOJECT __274,014:w
)DRESS .ey 5.
)TE TRANSMITTED
-AFF COORDINATOR
ENVIHONMUI FAL HEVIEW
ROUTIRG FORM
EPIC: -/Y-7/
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
' ' '
The*attrphiad.elyirO6rnental checklist .watreceived regarding this project. Pease revieiOn
comment belowtri, advise the responsible Official regarding the threshold' deterrnination.;;:The':q"
,envtronmental review file is available in the Planning Departnient thrOtigh . the above staff '
coordinator, : tornMents regarding the project you wish carried to the planning Pornrnisstari;...;:'-...'
BottiotAdjustfne and City Council should pe Submitted In the comment Section belgvi... .:.-•
TEM
. . „
COMMENT
PAGE 2, ITEM 9- WSDOT PLANS FOR UPGRADE OF PAC HWY.
ar:ZOTZEN. DAM ". , •
OU11ST1."'Ir. 0.1!
.1.).'1:(.._; OF Jil
PAGE 15, 14B UNDER YES - METRO BUS STOP ON PAC HWY FRONTING PROPERTY
PAGE 14, D THRU G -
ELEkuLPJ- ()I TRAFFIC PED SAFETY FOR ULTIMATE REQUIREMENT OF SIDEWALKS ON
PAC HWY AND S. 160TH. RON CAMERON FURTHER REQUIRES SIDEWALKS BE PLACED
ON 160TH AND PAC HWY AS PART OF DEVELOPMENT. Cs4:21E irrne-cmg) 141.01■0
PAGE 17, ITEM #16 - IDENTIFY FOR CONVERSION OF BUILDING TO B-1 FOR
PRE-APP USE, REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE MARSHALL-PROVIDE LETTERS OF
AVAILABILITY FOR WATER AND SEWER FROM FRANCHISE UTILITY DISTRICT (75
AND VAL VUE )
ate: Comments prepared by:,
013114/01
A. BACKGROUND
Con. No.
Epic File No. - -rg -cI
Fee4d -OO.68 Receipt No. 1,Q -7 j
2ZS ,vb
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
/
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: j.- &.L tv? R' .4J7 -if' Cpf'e
2. Name of applicant: 2tAArei' rlreAre4;0001,5vT, love.
3. Address and phone number.of applicant and contact person: 9AA S. fr1E7 Aq
ZYuo - 710 to Ave 17.0% inErf •W .rSc UA K-.4- 296>
4. Date checklist prepared: 3 i 1 1
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
/Y1 GUST /44 vie A- t- / /O ✓i 1 J 2 erL r` .
, w e - - Ai - 7
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
/VD
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
/i30/VIE
-2-
MAR 27 1991 �
C OP 7ti1CWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
• •
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
/. "ref eP
2. e'' o�tr4C
l<t�t- ('ear,
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
fopAo ,51C2s rr-. of e' FFieE ,?AJD �Atauisr ►i
rb eioN9�7 it e tor0 As A- 2-1I1 APO s fi!-. 7Ate
�u /t.1iiV�i -, /tJ Ltt.'Aw. �
fyV nrr r. 9e,
�sE w �- t-f
CZ-X41-4); r vrc' �sFrc -r�� /0S
` ! o k • ✓ 6 6W. Pr: ( . —
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
. r r-.. V 2 2 i, 7 3 .-.oet r /2 c -,rte
h d4147 -•
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
• • Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
/et=L.4T
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)?
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
-specify them and note any prime farmland.
/9O? OF 5/7 is i.yjt41 ✓ �
"kr Y-41- )
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Aima. F
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? ,/, /7
0 KRR Nr L T '
•
•Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
.tJ/ /4
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i..e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
/j /o •t>,�
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
/L./.0A-11. •
. Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface .
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
•
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
/,ti rip nDMp ri
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe. 7/01M/040
wIl- Jr 7riA4e.
17.-go•Q.i.t
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
. Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
wX 14.1,1.L /3F /4TA1-L /
/SLaEw l p x�2t du G- `Dos!? Cr, ?N7
,,F 71-f•
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
.fL A/v
•
•
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
Dse NG- P ,/%( c e 77 o
-7-ti A., it- A- , l
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
e(/0
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
/WVN%F
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
•
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
PrtarCrYtte__
�`EA- -��► -/ ti a —
b.. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
�P
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
4,/drn- 7/AJ6.-
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
/l/DiVE__
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
• 41 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and- levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the $ite.
C'o' ree -tore'
'Z top .ti✓t 7d 6 :.ov . of .
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
,t' A)E
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
l
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
•
40 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? e---/
f. What is the current o pr � ensive plan designation
of the site?
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of th site?
/V
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
it,O/V,F-
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
Gtid/it< — /Z pop c.
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
•
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
LI /tD/A-7G A1' noPIC -5 o�
` 4S7 rr v F 1-.- 4--
•
9. Housing
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income
housing?
A.9 / 4--
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Oi rter L!& 01-774J6—
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
�O
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
' A-'/.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
t. fi
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
l *e v 1 e F`{N.' / •
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? 7"
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
3 t' /›.4-4 i�V� Tfrc -L�j
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water; rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
,AA 14.-44-4N
71f Kos At. 5•
f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
UAJ K•a•v&t./
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. C' -. ties =:., available at ite:
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
* t.-, rLW ,4-,3,/ e7
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
f
Signature: CI . /14..e.
Date Submitted: 3 — p - 11 1
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICS 0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
. 411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
/e../OJV
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resources are:--
4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
• 0 Evaluation for.
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
DLO
Proposed measures to .avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
■
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICS • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s).of the proposal?
o OmA.r �t'4&r /PVT / D ? /"/AA o v f,.M S'�VIS
d #mot e r .4�t.19 4i'fl IAN 7 4) 7 J c• 'J !fit
/1"
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
"r rtwop,e)
"+'t/3 / •
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
-J
-23-