Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-19-87 - CITY OF TUKWILA - MINKLER BOULEVARD SANITARY SEWERMINKLER BLVD. SEWER PROJECT SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION MINKLER BLVD. & ANDOVER PARK WEST EPIC -19 -87 re @ 7 cOCs CSC MCP ® . 208169mp kL 'F(L-Asgr\--- 0 + SUBJECT N M (--1/ () MESSAGE DATE 1 U/ 6 / &) REPLY -rs( bps 01-14 t\l(T-il's - -'CUB r 0 N sT LIP 74 '- c\-LL. L I p Nsoo 1 u T v(K■ N, a SIGNEDOrp s � 7;, f 1 J i i L Fu its= SIGNED REDIFORM as 472. SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT - PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DATE / / carbaMess POLY PAK (50 SETS1 4P472 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN EPIC F.PTr -19 -R7 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG ri PLNG [ P.W. ri FIRE [j POLICE n P & R PROJECT MINKLER BLVD. SEWER PROJECT LOCATION MINKLER BLVD. AND ANDOVER PK. W. FILE NO. EPIC 19 -87 DATE TRANSMITTED 9/22/87 STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9/29/87 REBECCA FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU W_SH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT '� V 0 Cv ""^''1 �I (C�� t y w fl, DATE t>/(/ /4—) COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: F.PTr -19 -R7 TO: n BLDG [j PLNG 11 P.W. F-7 FIRE n POLICE PROJECT MINKLER BLVD. SEWER PROJECT P & R LOCATION MINKLER BLVD. AND ANDOVER PK. W. FILE NO. EPIC 19 -87 DATE TRANSMITTED 9/22/87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9/29/87 STAFF COORDINATOR REBECCA FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE c�� X7/41 COMMENTS PREPARED BY )3t.2..._ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FPM-19-A7 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: " n BLDG F PLNG P.W. PROJECT FIRE (1 POLICE (-[ P & R MINKLER BLVD. SEWER PROJECT LOCATION MINKLER BLVD. AND ANDOVER PK. W. FILE NO. EPIC 19 -87 DATE TRANSMITTED 9/22/87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9/29/87 STAFF COORDINATOR REBECCA FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED 9- 024/-47 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ACCEPTED 34 WITHOUT COMMFNTS ❑ AS NOTED IN RED ❑ PER THE ATTACHED LETTER The drawings affixed hereto have been reviewed and accepted by the City of Tukwila Fire Dept. Additions, deletions or revisions to those drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a resubmittal of revised drawings. Final acceptance is subject to field - inspertinn by a representative this of department DATE: 7.---ZY—$7 BY: �j'? ._ CITY OF TUKWILA 575.4407 575 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC F.PTC -19 -R7 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE ni P & R PROJECT INKLER BLVD. SEWER PROJECT LOCATION MINKLER BLVD. AND ANDOVER PK. W. FILE NO. EPIC 19 -87 DATE TRANSMITTED 9/22/87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9/29/87 STAFF COORDINATOR REBECCA FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • DATE' 1 EMPLOYEE'S NAME: 1 CUSTOMER: �l A" . ILh11l1R L.l11 LkC& t,4 /2a -�) ck t, ak c-1-0 f CITY OF ;kJKANAL/. CUSTOMER CHARGE TRANSMITTAL 'S CHARGES: DESCRIPTION Maps.& Publications ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 000/341.500 $ Printing & Duplication . 000/341.600 I Services (copies) i�= N YLIDa - ©O /31i • 831 t 1 o O cAH-L-r.AL L is-r- TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: )e.L{-- s wog _ (p �ECEG�lE� .SEP It- 1987 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Control No. Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Minkler Boulevard Sewer Project No. 84 -SW09 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Fred Graham Horton Dennis & Associates - 320 - 2nd Ave. S., Kirkland. WA 98033 (822 -2525) 4. Date checklist prepared: September 15, 1987 5. Agency-requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): October to mid November 1987 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The project is a recommended improvement in the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Sewer Plan. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to my knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Union Pacific Railroad Company approval.- 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no. need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description . of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The project consists of installing 1,660 LF of 10 -inch and 140 LF of 8 -inch sanitary sewer including boring for three railroad crossings. The construction is necessary_in order to abandon Pump Station Number Three. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Minkler Boulevard from Andover Park West east to the City shops - Section 26,_ Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Not to my knowledge. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, of er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Street is constructed at a min. slope of 1 %+ the channel banks at the sewer crossing is sloped at a 3:2 grade. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Borings indicate 6 feet of granular material over silts ranging from clayey silt to dense sandy silt. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None are noted. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. None. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 100 %. All asphalt removal will be replaced by an asphalt patch. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust from construction equipment. Dust will also be present during construction. Following construction, automobile traffic will produce exhaust in quantities similar to existing conditions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None that are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction will be limited to normal working hours. 3. Water a. • Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A King County P -17 drainage channel flows east into the Green River. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in,'or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.Yes. The P -17 channel flows parallel. with Minkler Boulevard - A sewer crossing is proposed over the existing channel. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. None. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Construction ditch will be dewatered. Quantity not known. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. A pipe storm sewer from the roadway discharges into the P -17 drainage channel in 5 different locations. The water then flows east into the Green River. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A temporary filtering system placed prior to the street inlets could be installed or the water from dewatering would be pumped into the sanitary system if the engineer decides that no damage would be done to the system,_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass and landscape area. c. List threatened or endangered species .known to be on or near the site. None. d. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All grass and landscape_areas disturbed will be replaced. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Existing conditions will remain the same. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. No increase. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The proposed gravity sewer system would eliminate Lift Station No. 3 - Energy needs would be less than existing needs. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only c Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Construction equipment operation. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment operation during normal working hours - Short Term Effect. Long Term Effect - No change in existing conditions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limit construction to normal working hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing asphalt road Light industrial property adjacent to the project. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the Site? Public Right -of -Way f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public Right -of -Way g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project is part of the Tukwila Comprehensive Sewer Plan. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be • altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence: of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Do not know - Site is public right -of -way. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project is on Minkler Boulevard that is used for local access. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit Stop? Minkler Blvd. is not a transit route - Nearest stop at Andover West and Minkler Boulevard. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No change from existing conditj ns. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Minkler will remain open to traffic at all times - Contractor will provide proper signing and flagmen as required by the City of Tukwila. No change in existing conditions after construction. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: natural gas, refuse service, anitary sewer see is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water may be needed for dust control - City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is . relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only INtiR0 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23-