The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-19-91 - MA SEGALE - FILL (STRANDER BOULEVARD / ANDOVER PARK WEST)SEGALE- STRANDER PROPERTY FILL PRELOAD SITE FOR FUTURE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STRANDER BLVD. & ANDOVER PK. W. EPIC -19 -91 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department, of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director June 18, 1992 Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Mr. Nelsen: /„wc,e7te This is to confirm our phone conversation yesterday regarding re- vegetation of the above site. My letter of May 7, 1992 extended the deadline for re- vegetation of the site to May 30, 1992. This extension was granted to allow you to comply with your SEPA requirements for the project. As I mentioned yesterday, the City of Tukwila has declared a water emergency, and has placed restrictions on water use. Until the water restrictions are lifted, we are asking property owners to defer new plantings. Given this, you may delay the re-seeding .of your site until next year, or until May 30, 1993. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this. (431- 3670). Sincerel Ann Siegenth611er Assistant Planner cc: File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 • City of Tukwila May 7, 1992 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Mr. Nelsen: This is in response to your letter of April 14, 1992 regarding the approved SEPA conditions for the above project. I qpderstand that you spoke recently with Rick Beeler, Tukwila's SEPrA Official. I also understand that, at that time, you agreed that development of your site may not occur for a few years. However, the site is currently experiencing erosion and gullying. This delay in development and the site's erosion potential were the factors which led to the stipulation of re- vegetation as a SEPA condition. There has been no change in these factors which would make re- vegetation unnecessary. Given this, the original SEPA conditions must be satisfied. As stated in my letter of April 8, 1992, the deadline for re- vegetation of the site was April 30, 1992. To give you an opportunity to comply with your SEPA requirements, this deadline has been extended to May 30, 1992. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter (431- 3670). Sincerel Ann Siegent aler Assistant Planner cc: File L. Rick Beeler Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 43,3-1833 • ife< PdetS /DO ea), May 4, 1992 Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 8,8050 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Mr. Nelsen: This is in response to your letter of April 14, 1992 regarding the approved SEPA conditions for the .above project. I understand that you <ka e, spokew recently with Rick Beeler, Tukwila's SEPA Official. I also understand that, at that time, you agreed that 41pevelopment. of your site may not occur for ul a cct years.___ *, the site is experiencing active erosion and gullying. This delay in development and the site's erosion potential were the factors which led to the stipulation of re- vegetation as a SEPA condition. There has been no change in these factors which would make re- vegetation unnecessary. Given this, the original SEPA conditions must be satisfied. As stated in my letter of April 8, 1992, the deadline for re- vegetation of the site was April 30, 1992. To give you an opportunity to comply with your SEPA requirements, this deadline has been extended to May 25, 1992. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter (431- 3670). Sincerely, Ann Siegenthaler Assistant Planner cc: File L. Rick Beeler April 14, 1992 M.A. SEGALE, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS Ms. Ann Siegenthaler A Esistan . Planner CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Ms. Siegenthaler: I am in receipt of your April 8, 1992, letter concerning the Segale - Strander Fill. - This letter is written to advise you that pursuant to the Land Altering Permit which was issued for this project, "seeding of site is not practical and will interfere with the integrity of the pre -load, and therefore is not a requirement with this pre -load activity ". As indicated in the Environmental Checklist submitted as part of our application for this project (the " Strander Property Fill "), it is our intention to develop the site to accommodate a future building compatible with the zoning. Inasmuch as the precise configuration of this future building has not been finalized, we believe it is not prudent to seed the site only to remove the resulting vegetation in the future. Further, as we read the Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance, the requirement to seed the site was intended to mitigate erosion and loss of vegetation. Erosion has not been a problem -- it has been controlled by various other means, and what little vegetation existed on site prior to the pre -load will be more than replaced with whatever landscaping is put in place in connection with the ultimate development of the property. In keeping with the Land Altering Permit, we will not be seeding the site before April 30, 1992. Very truly yours, M. A. SEGALE, INC. Steve Nelson LAPR 20 1992 CITY OF I UKWILA PLANNING DEPT. P.O. BOX 88050 • 18010 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98138 • TELEPHONE: (206) 575 -3200 • FAX: (206) 575 -3207 223- 01- SE- GA- LM- A372NO An equal opportunity employer • City of Tukwila • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor April 8, 1992 Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park = West .. Dear Mr. Nelsen: This letter is a brief reminder that the deadline is approaching for fulfilling a SEPA condition for the above project. A Mitigated Declaration of Non- Significance for the above project was issued on April 30, 1991 (copy attached). This MDNS constituted approval of your project under SEPA environmental review. One of the conditions of approval was that "all disturbed areas shall be re- seeded after a maximum time period of one year. "' The requirement for re- seeding the site will need to be fulfilled by April 30, 1992. If you have alternative plans for your project, or if you have any questions regarding your SEPA approval, please let me know. Sincerely, Ann Siegenthr Assistant Pl'nner cc: File L. Rick Beeler Phil Fraser Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 • April 6, 1992 Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Mr. Nelsen: .11 This letter is a brief reminder that the deadline is approaching for fulfilling a SEPA condition for the above project. A Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance for the above project was issued on April 30, 1991 (copy attached). This MDNS constituted approval of your project under SEPA environmental review. One of the conditions of approval was that "all disturbed areas shall be re- seeded after a maximum time period of one year." The requirement for re- seeding the site will need to be fulfilled by April 30, 1992. If you have alternative plans for your project, or if you have any questions regarding your SEPA approval, please let me know. Sincerely, Ann Siegenthaler Assistant Planner cc: File L. Rick Beeler Phil Fraser WAC 197 -11 -970 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal To fill vacant site with approximately 35,000 cubic yards of pit -run materials. Proponent M.A. regale, Inc.; P.O. Box 88050; Tukwila, WA 98138 Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Andover Park West & Strander Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington; Section 26, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -19 -91 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. (� There is no comment period for this DNS J( This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by May 15, 1991 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwi a...' _.98188 Date April 30, 1991 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 April 30, 1991 Mr. Steve Nelsen M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 PHONE # (206) 433.1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor RE: Segale - Strander Fill - EPIC -19 -91 Strander Blvd. & Andover Park West Dear Mr. Nelsen: We have completed our review of your environmental checklist for the above project. A Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance has been issued (copy attached). Based on the information you have provided, it appears that this fill is a pre -load for a future building. Please be aware that locations for any future buildings on the site require separate permit reviews. Any pre -load for a specific building footprint prior to these separate permit reviews is undertaken at the owner's risk. Now that the environmental determination has been issued, you may obtain the necessary Grade and Fill Permit and Annual Hauling Permit from our Public Works Department (433- 0179). Please call me at 433 -0170 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review. Sincerely Ann Siegerfthaler Assistant Planner cc: File Ross Heller, Public Works CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PROJECT: DATE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FILE REFERENCE: PHONE # (206) 4331800 CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE SEGALE - STRANDER FILL April 30, 1991 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor To fill vacant site with approximately 35,000 cubic yards of pit -run material. Andover Park West & Strander Blvd., Tukwila, Washington; Section 26, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 EPIC -19 -91 THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review of this proposal consisted of an analysis based on the Environmental Checklist prepared by M.A. Segale, Inc. for the City of Tukwila (April 2, 1991). DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to fill a currently vacant site with approximately 35,000 cubic yards of pit -run material. The material would be graded and compacted over a period of approximately one to nine months. The owner has requested a Grade and Fill Permit in order to bring the site up to the approximate grade of surrounding streets. No buildings or other improvements are associated with this request, and no approvals for such improvements are implied by this environmental determination. MDNS: Segale - Strander Fill 4/30/91 Page 2 PERMITS REQUIRED: Grade and Fill Permit; Annual Hauling Permit. CHECKLIST ITEMS A. EARTH The site is mostly flat, with slopes of less than three percent. Approximately 35,000 cubic yards of pit run material would be brought to the site. Initially the fill material would be approximately twelve feet high (35.5'). After re- distribution over the site and settling, the fill's ultimate elevation would match existing street grades (23.5'). There is a potential for erosion throughout the lifetime of the project. Measures implemented to mitigate this potential for erosion and sedimentation include trenches •along the perimeter of the top of the fill,' with drainage pipe installed to carry excess water to the base of the fill. In addition, a four -foot high filter fabric fence would be installed between the fill area and the destination catch basin. Seeding of the stabilized fill area would help reduce erosion potential. However, due to the fact that the fill material will be graded and distributed over the site at frequent, indefinite intervals, seeding of the fill is not practical during the settlement period (see Condition #2). B. WATER There are no permanent surface water bodies on site. Across the street (Andover Park West) from the site is an approximately 18 -acre pond. Storm runoff and runoff from watering operations would be directed to an existing catch basin at the northwest corner of the site. This catch basin system runs in a direction opposite the pond. Although site runoff would be filtered through filter fabric fencing to reduce sedimentation, additional off -site siltation could occur during significant rainfall. This could be reduced through monitoring of the sedimentation control system during significant storms (see Condition #1). As no buildings or paved surfaces are associated with this construction, the project would not result in impervious surfaces. • MDNS: Segale - Strander Fill 4/30/91 Page 3 C. AIR Short term impacts to air quality include dust generation and emissions from equipment during filling and grading operations. Implementation of dust control measures during construction, such as watering exposed soil surfaces and equipment traffic areas, would mitigate short term air quality impacts. For these reasons, no significant long term impacts to air quality are expected. D. PLANTS Currently, grass and herbaceous plants cover most of the proposed site. Landscaping or re- seeding would help mitigate the loss of this vegetation cover (see Condition #2). However, no re- vegetation is proposed. E. VISUAL QUALITY Currently, the site is vacant. Upon completion of the project, there would be little change in the visual quality of the area. F. NOISE The site is surrounded by commercial businesses. Operation of construction equipment would result in a short term increase in noise levels near these adjacent uses. Limiting construction activities to week days as provided under TMC 8.22.160 would partially reduce short term noise impacts. G. TRAFFIC Heavy equipment traffic along major arterials in the Central Business District would be temporarily increased during construction. However, potential impacts of hauling operations would be mitigated through the required Annual Hauling Permit process. As the project consists of grade and fill operations only, it would not add vehicle trips nor significantly change existing circulation. As a result, no traffic impacts are expected. MDNS: Segale - Strander Fill 4/30/91 Page 4 H. UTILITIES The proposed fill could result in residual settling of the ground around an existing pipeline on site. Potential disturbance of this pipeline due to settling could be mitigated through a plan for regular, frequent monitoring of elevation changes (See Condition #3). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate since the environmental review indicates no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. MITIGATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EARTH 1. Throughout the life of the project, the applicant shall monitor potential off -site siltation during significant rainfall, and take any measures deemed appropriate by the Public Works Department to control off -site siltation. 2. All disturbed areas shall be re- seeded after a maximum time period of one year. UTILITIES 3. When fill material is placed within 100' of the curb line, the applicant shall monitor the ground around the existing pipeline for changes in elevation. This monitoring shall be done on a weekly basis. The applicant shall immediately notify the Public Works Department of any changes in elevation. I, SYLVIA A. OSBY , [] Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [j Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit SO IJ I J 11C au1 i0N hereby declare th 41/ at: ❑ Determination of Nonsignificance 4741 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance ❑ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice O Other O Other, was mailed to each of the following addresses Name of Project Strander Property Fill File Number EPIC -19 -91 on April 29, 1991 19 . • CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCF_NTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 April 29, 1991 Mario Segale P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 PHONE # (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor RE: Segale Fill at Strander and Andover Park West Plan Check No. 91- 021 -U) and Annual Hauling Permit (Plan Check No. 91- 023 -U) Dear Sir: Public Works Department has reviewed and approves your annual hauling permit. See Denise Millard, Permit Coordinator, to have the following permit prepared for pickup: 1. Annual Hauling Permit (Permit Fee = $25.00) $ 2,000 Bond and $ 1,000,000 Certificate of Insurance is attached. 2. Land Altering Permit (Permit Fee = $ 394.50) Conditions of permit are as follows: A. Property owner must maintain temporary erosion and sediment control system to remove all visible erosion/ siltation on this project. This project must be monitored by the Developer during the significant rainfall events to insure no visible off -site siltation occurs. B. Property owner shall monitor site for residual settling with respect to public infrastructure and other adjacent developments and structures. Monitoring shall be done on a weekly basis when material is placed within 100 feet of the curb lines or other properties. The Director of Public Works shall be notified of changes in elevations . As this project will be carried out over an extended period of time (per comments of applicant on 4/10/91), seeding of site is not practical and will interfere with the integrity of the pre -load, and therefore is not a require- ment with this pre -load activity. D. This permit is being issued in advance of a building permit and review for the benefit of the applicant. This approval is for placement only and carries no guarantees as to the suitability or location for use of this fill as a building preload. If you have any questions regarding this matter do not hesitate to call me at 433 -0179. Sincerel Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer Public Works Department xc: Ann Siegenthaler, Planning Department Greg Villanueva Permit Coordinator Read File Development File Enclosures (5) PF /amc:B6:segale 4500 -91 .; PR.9DUCEP. Sedgwick of 1I1 Portland, INSURED M. ATTN: P. Tukwila -i- ....- .- :...,. . .... _ A� /�t'/m •• t `" ISSUE DATE (MM /DD /VY) T `� ' 1. `CERTIFICAT OF.� INSURANCE SFILE 3/27/91 James Oregon, Inc. 5W Columbia OR 97201 A. Segale, Inc . Mr. George Hull 0. Box 88050 WA 99139 THIS CERTIFICATE IS. ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO R UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING'COVERAGE COMPANY A Indemnity Company LETTER A (Bodily, Injury Only) COMPANY B LETTER Home Indemnity Company.. COMPANY ''�� LETTER C kr�`., • %C1 " E® COMPANY LETTER D APR R (� 0:1 1991 COMPANY E 1'uKWILA LETTER 1fdORKS COVERAGES " THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF CO TYPE OF INSURANCE LTR� a.,. PUDLIC ,_, HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION: LIMITS DATE (MM /DD /YY) ' DATE (MM /DD /YY) OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN POLICY NUMBER A GENERAL LIABILITY ,.__. -. )( COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY .._ .I CLAIMS MADEX OCCUR. _ GLRF720505 4/01 /91 4/01 /92 ; GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 22090000_ R _.. , .. 1000000 PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. $ PERSONAL & ADV. INJURY • $ 1 000009 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 ;FIRE DAMAGE (Any one tire) $ 50000 MED. EXPENSE (Any one person)I $ 5000 TOWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. `vy_- A Stop p Gap B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X i ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS —I I SCHEDULED AUTOS I X I HIRED AUTOS X I NON -OWNED AUTOS r— (GARAGE LIABILITY --y 8AF567733 4/01/91 4/01/92 ; COMBINED SINGLE j $ LIMIT 1000000 BODILY INJURY ; (Per person) BODILY INJURY $ , (Per accident) , PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EXCESS LIABILITY !UMBRELLA FORM • ; OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM EACH EACH OCCURRENCE $ ;AGGREGATE WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND;. EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY State of Washington Dept. Industries Account #216554; Compensation Act of Labor & State STATUTORY LIMITS I - : EACH ACCIDENT .........___.. _........ _.__...._ .... _._.,.. _..._. ..._ .. ......_._ _ DISEASE — POLICY LIMIT i $ I DISEASE —EACH EMPLOYEE I $ OTHER I - DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONS/VEHICLES /SPECIAL ITEMS AS RESPECTS "ALL OPERATIONS" (DOES NOT APPLY TO ADDITIONAL INSURED(5) CERTIFICATE- HOLDER .' CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPT 6230 SOUTH CENTER BUILDING TUKWILA, WA 98067. CANCELLATION '?• SHOULD EXPIRATION 4>` MAIL LEFT, LIABILITY f ANY OF THE DATE 30 DAYS WRITTEN t, ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR VON HE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS R REPRESENTATIVES. BUT FAILURE O ANY KIND ,/� AUTHORIZ CEPFeTIy C ' WA ER / _�*^- �,.•�,jj ,4-4-,*psi �'"�.�,- ®ACO CORPORATION1990 'k> mz ACORD''25 -S (7/90)7:-.,,,%. ...... _.'; .< , .. _, ... 75— 16 • • McDONALD & McGARRY CO. Insurance Brokers 180 NICKERSON STREET, SUITE 302 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109. PHONE (206) 281 -1128 October 21, 1985 LICENSE AND PERMIT BOND INFORMATION SHEET PRINCIPAL: M. A. SEGALE, INC. PAYABLE TO: City of Tukwila BOND NO.: 2878355 EFFECTIVE DATE: 06 02 78 TERM: Concurrent with the term of the Permit BOND AMOUNT: $2,000. ANNUAL PREMIUM: $50.00 Minimum with next billing of if prepaid for 3 years, $125.00 DESCRIPTION: Blanket Permit Bond Under Permit No. 39-78 for use of streets or roads of the City of Tukwila for hauling or other purposes Vv 6,0)s' vtA /-14 SEA 54c uc S7� -3Z�o ‘I° CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: / MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN TIME: A.M. P.M. TYPE: ❑ Visit El Conference elephone — 0 Incoming 0 Outgoing Name of pe (s) conta dr in contact w h you: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Organization (office, dept., bureau, etc.) Telephone No.: Location of Visit/Conference: SUBJECT: er,,.0iive SUMMARY: lcf�nr 1w� 8�alrs : osose vb een/i�, f .zv:�, s /rte 4=�' . -J1�it l!!(i¢ . Ge7kJ- Ya � /�tO�i/�° . .71/01e-- teXeA 35, 5. for c/st 6 frie5l 4s carae7ied 661,0'7 A; ;71 7.° a7, 5 • 7/-r,e0‘7 jee7r9/. oi�Gl ) /, G w)f /7/ or 4 gig Adt_fx4, 5a0 out 4.-/Te ,4 5, Wts-oritec44eein dmilcan40-if i/?zr4- Clite/74' Signature: Date: .CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • building , _' Q Planning w' Pu PROJECT ADDRESS 'LANIW SE PERMIT ROUTING FORM PERMIT NO.: WAG It 569ke. -grgiwnett PI -1-O p ' Aw 'tdtr 61 i Andovcr pk. UV (S, e . G ni ) WI RESPONSE REQUESTED BY DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Please 101/10W the attached projects plans and respond with appropriate comments lathe pace below Indicate crucial *concerns by checking the box next to the lines) on which that:concerc,Is noted.< ..• s. • /i • • 1 1 • Public Works Comments, Segale - Strander Pre -load: Property owner must maintain temporary erosion and sedimentation control system to remove all visible erosion /siltation - this project must be monitored by the developer during significant rainfall to insure no visible off -site siltatio is occurring. aW� /P17 Gzc/ sued d-e /ZeeeS� Property owner is to mon to public infrastructure. Monitoring material is Public Works site for residual settling with espect dl shall be one on when placed within 100' of the curb line. The Director of shall be notified of changes in elevation immediately. /7 k,�u As the project will be carried out over an extended period of time (per comments of applicant on of the pre -load, and is notLpractical. 4- 10 -91), seeding of the site would interfere with the integrity CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LANCibSE PERMIT ROUTING FORM PROJECT 6 Q1.e - 9T14 pgE t,40 A1) PERMIT NO.: MC ' (1 11 • ADDRESS 5ielwatr6I116t AvndoverPk• w (5, a. • ca ) DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4 . DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 4/16 Piease review .the attached: pro }acts.: plans and respond e below,' Indicate cruclat concern s, by checking the box' next :to the tine. s on which that :cont r is noted Ditto D 5/. timt ve- of5tufat finezroftx adyal P,w. Takun(L e ? D 7 : �i1iu E ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: o9oa/8 £p/G- qI 0 CITY OF TUKWILA [M. A. Segale, Inc. - Strander Property Fill] ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. NJO_PD APR 0 21991 C TY of TL M LA pip.NING DF_PT � • • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Evaluation for Agency Use Only Control No. Epic File No. — 7(4— Fee $225.00 Receipt No.. i.4 f' A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Strander Property Fill 2. Name of applicant: M. A. Segale, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Address of Applicant: M. A. Segale, Inc. P. O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA. 98138 Contact Person: Steven R. Nelson Telephone Number: (206) 575 -3200 4. Date checklist prepared: April 02, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Applicant proposes to complete all work associated with grading and filling commencing as soon as possible following receipt of applicable permits. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting . the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE. Environmental Ckeddlat (Qty of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property PIII - 2 - NUM APR 0 21991 CI'ry OF ItAifviLA PLAN!,IIN( RrPT, 0 • 1 Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANNT 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Tukwila Grade and Fill Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Preload site for future building construction. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The SE corner at the intersection of Strander Boulevard and Andover Park West in the City of Tukwila. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth A. General description of the site (circle /underline one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than three percent (3 %) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand Environmental Checklist (OW at Tukwila) RE: Wander Property Fill - 3 - j4PR02 f991 CITY OF TUKVOLA PLANNING DEPT. 40 Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO. E. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Purpose of filling and grading will be to bring site to grade and preload for future building using pit run material of approximately 35,000 cubic yards import and grade existing easterly portion to approximate elevation 23.5 — contributing to 3,500 cubic yards of cut to be spread over western portion of site. Pit run materials will be imported from active pit sites in the area. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, erosion of on -site pit run fill is possible and will be alleviated by use of berms along the top edges of the fill. Any associated water water will exit via the designated side slope drainage channels. G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NONE. H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion of on -site pit run fill is possible and will be alleviated by use of berms along the top edges of the fill. Any associated water will exit via the designated side slope drainage channels. Environmental Checklist (Qty of Tukwila) — 4 RE: Wander Property till NUM APR 0 21991 D cfl Y OF TUiivWILA PLANNING DEPT. 1 Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2. Air: A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal dust from excavation equipment which will be controlled with limited use of water. B. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N /A. 3. Water: A. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and, seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, pond on west side of Andover Park West which has unknown name, flows to Gilliam Creek Drainage Basin. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the pond referred to in item 3.A.1) above is approximately 70 feet west of the site, separated by Andover Park West thoroughfare. Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) 5 RE: Slander Property 5111 Evaluation for Agency Use Only OCRE APR 0 2 1991 CI'T'Y OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5 6 Environmental Cheddbl (City of Tukwila) RE: Stzander Property F111 140. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. 6 JT7] •IJ APR 0 2 1991 CITY OF 7L1/44w%i*LA PLC,. *'NIAir P1 • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ' agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N /A. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2 Environmental Checklist (City o[ Tukwila) RE: Strander Property Fill Source of runoff will be storm water consistent with current conditions which will flow into catch basin at northwest corner of the site and into Gilliam Creek Drainage Basin. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO. - 7 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only OrN D PAR 0 2 1991 CITY OF TUKVVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Erosion control measures to be in place prior to filling. 4. Plants: A. Check or circle /underline types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs .0 grass _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eel grass, mifoil, other x other types of vegetation Various vegetation as landscaping on adjacent site, in place. B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE. D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N /A. Environmental Cheddlst (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property 1II 8 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only MCOM APR 0 2 ]991 CITY OF TUKWILA PI f \.NNjN 'D PT. 0 • • Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 5. Animals: A. Circle /underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: B. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO. D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N /A. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE. Environmental Cheddlst (Qty of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property Fill - 9 APR 0 2 1991 Gf ; OF TLIKV ViLA tLA411NING DE °T. • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 7. Environmental Health: A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE. B. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other ?) 2 3 Environmental Cheddbl (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property EMI ) NONE. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. No additional noise is anticipated. Noise associated with the project will be noise associated with normal, short - term, construction excavation operation. Hours will be from 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE. - 10 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only APR 0 21991 CITY OF TUKW LA PI.A.! ■!NING Ps="T, • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 8. Land and Shoreline Use: A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is now vacant and is surrounded by industrial /commercial buildings and a hotel. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO. C. Describe any structures on the site. NONE. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO. E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? C -2 G. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N /A. H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NO CHANGE. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE. Environmental Checklist (Qty of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property Fill Evaluation for Agency Use Only J1-.! . APR 0 21996 Cf Y OFTUKVVILA 1 1,1 DFPT. • • Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N /A. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The site will be brought to grade and preloaded to accommodate future building compatible with the zoning. 9. Housing :, A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N /A. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NONE. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N /A. 10. Aesthetics: A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N /A. B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N /A. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N /A. Environmental Checklist (Qty ct Tukwila) RE: Strander Property EIll - 12 - CITY OF TUKVV LA .. y,p`1IK7 rroT. • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 11. Light and Glare: A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO. C. What existing off site sources of light to glare may affect your proposal? NONE. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N /A. 12. Recreation: A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE. B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N /A. Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property Fill - 13 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO. B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N /A. 14. Transportation: A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Strander Boulevard and Andover Park West. B. It site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Nearest transit stop is at the subject intersection. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N /A. Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property FLi - 14 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0. APR 021991 C3� Y OF rc1aZx Pl. a►a.fl !r, rispT • • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO. E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO. F. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N /A. G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N /A. 15. Public Services: A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO. B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N /A. Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property Fill - 15 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only APR 021991 C! 9 7 OF 1 UKkrviiLA Pij.ANNit.in r. -r • Environmental Checklist (continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 16. Utilities: A. Circle /underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NONE. C. SIGNATURE: The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge, I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. OWNER /AGENT SIGNATURE: ��.og,. M. A. SEGALE, INC., M. A. Segale, President DATE SUBMITTED: April 02, 1991 Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) RE: Strander Property F711 - 16 - Evaluation for Agency Use Only i ' /'T- 0 2 !SC , ct-rY OF TUKWILA TOP OF SURCHARGE EL 35.5 ORIGINAL GROUND SURCHARGE FINISH FL 27.5 EXCAVATIONziiiiioa� ai -;,"'"W,,%27 -EL 24:0 SECTION: AA SCALE 1 - =40' HORPL ": R PM= Id 142 02 M. TYPICAL CROSS SECTION TYPICAL FILTER : FENCE TOP OF SURCHARGE EL. 35.5 SURCHARGE. STRANDER BLVD..: ORIGINAL GROUND SECTION. BB SCALE '1"=40' "' HO= . SCALE: 1" =40' DATE: 2/13/91 M.A. SEGALE, INC DWG.. bY. STRANDER BLVD PROPERTY: DRAWING. NO. TYPICAL SECTIONS:. ` 2 OF 2 STRANDER BOULEVARD '' .590* 39' 8 50 . L=79 :T =5.,: 574.48 TAX : NO. x82303 -9001 Li,45AC] MI5/ 655 • - 'NOTE:, GEOTECIiNICAL REPORT TO BE -SUBMITTED AT THE PROJECT . TIME OF THE BUILDING SITE . i PERMIT. i APPLICATION. RAILROAD & `POWERLZNE SCALE: f -40• DATE: 2/13/91 VICINI'Y MAP 'STRANDER ` BLVD PROPERTY mil; xo. GRADING & SURCHARGE PLAN mil; /3S`1,6'3 Eating .; CttY OF TUKWILA •