The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-20-87 - CITY OF TUKWILA - MACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENTMACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENT WIDENING, OVERLAY, CURB & SIDEWALK INSTALLATION SOUTHCENTER BLVD & S. 150T" ST. EPIC -20 -87 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 To: Brian Shelton, Public Works Department From: L eeler, SEPA Responsible Official Date: October 15, 1987 RE: Environmental Determination for Macadam Road Improvements (EPIC- 20 -87) Based on the information in your environmental checklist, it is my understanding that the subject project involves the construction of minor road improvements which I have determined to be SEPA exempt pursuant to WAC 197- 11- 800(2)(b) & (c). The actions I have evaluated are typified by those listed below. 1. Widening of existing curb to curb width from 22 to 36 feet for 2,500 ft. in order to add an auxiliary lane for localized purposes; 2. Construction of a public traffic control signal; 3. Construction of a sidewalk, storm sewers, street lighting, and other ancillary improvements; and 4. Excavation of 2,600 cu. yds. of earth which is exempt as an integral part of an exempt action. CC (1t112-E(c.ag---) OA C.- 1617--Ii--8e)c, Ci) (4,) ) !t-..041-4 • ‹.41..IL a 44 ,_c_t:•60&4e co &d. a /41- CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN EPIC-20 -87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: n BLDG El PLNG n P.W. ] FIRE n POLICE 1-1 P & R PROJECT MACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENT - CITY OF TUKWILA LOCATION MACADAM ROAD, TUKWILA, WA BETWEEN SOUTHCENTER FILE NO. EPIC -20 -87 BLVD AND SOUTH 150TH STREET. DATE TRANSMITTED 10 -6 -87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10 -12 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT N10 corn . DATE %3 u(-s-) COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 P •' CITY OF TUKWILA • • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM Em-20-87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: n BLDG [j PLNG P.W. (i FIRE (i POLICE I v'P & R PROJECT' MACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENT - CITY OF TUKWILA LOCATION MACADAM ROAD, TUKWILA, WA BETWEEN SOUTHCENTER FILE NO. EPIC -20 -87 BLVD AND SOUTH 150TH STREET. DATE TRANSMITTED 10 -6 -87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10 -12 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE /0 /e—/r) COMMENTS PREPARED BY /�o„„ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • •CN EPIC-20 -87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG n PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT MACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENT - CITY OF TUKWILA LOCATION MACADAM ROAD, TUKWILA, WA BETWEEN SOUTHCENTER FILE NO. EPIC -20 -87 BLVD AND SOUTH 150TH STREET. DATE TRANSMITTED 10 -6 -87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10 -12 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT CJarfrucLit DATE /Q i� COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC-20 -87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [ j BLDG j1 PLNG P.W. FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT MACADAM ROAD IMPROVEMENT - CITY OF TUKWILA LOCATION MACADAM ROAD, TUKWILA, WA BETWEEN SOUTHCENTER FILE NO. EPIC -20 -87 BLVD AND SOUTH 150TH STREET. DATE TRANSMITTED 10 -6 -87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10 -12 -87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT r4- (7,/ i Skei ��a� id4` ✓b4 ,14/9 e.2(C eCk/i �y �'47( Ae, r'//( // -X21 ��e� c re ss f DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: �6L1 g w.)1 AJ6 FROM: pAl c fo,L7d G.e . DATE: 0_07 SUBJECT: Af 4,4f aDi curl/ cF�7 � /221 .5.4e odekketas Pe0TFci cP44 7eAJ /o P/e4se- /eli/e& aI /process /4 a 1 d / i as s. - as sa4.. w // � - dt7 i -rte Mr ilOn - � ��ca -k cc,. \LSEP 2 1987 Ci�Y C1�F �?.Pir.�`�`ii_A PLANNit�lG f' �=" NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Cone No. Epic File No. .20-87 Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Macadam Road Improvement 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Brian Shelton 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188: Phone: (206) 431 -1841 4. Date checklist prepared ;sep1- n1 .r 7S; 1987 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to be in in 1 ,,. •u• - 4 88 Storm Sewer Construction. and road improvements will bp sPParatPly rnntrartpd within this time frame. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1. Prior to Construction activity an in -depth Soils Report will be prepared. 2. Traffic Counts and traffic analysis has been done. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes; The North Hill Reservior Project for Tukwila will feature an • emergency overflow which will drain into the proposed Macadam Road Storm prain. • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. W.A.S.H.D.O.T. COnstruction Permit SEPA Approval City of Tukwila Right -Of -Way Use Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 2500 Linear feet of. roadway widening, overlay, and curb /gutter and sidewalk installation on Macadam Road between Southcenter Boulevard and South 150th Street. will include storm sewers, illumination, and a new traffic signal at the intersection of Macadam Road with Southcenter Boulevard. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,- site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Macadam Road Tukwila, Washington between Southcenter Boulevard and South 150th Street. Section 14, TWNSHP 23N R 4E.W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIF S Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General d •tion of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2.1 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Primarily glacial till d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, however, the pending ani l c report w; 11 adrizass- slope stability e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill . ,a,p c v of Common Excavation for sidewalk_placement. 1300 C.L. C1ass R_$ank Run Gravel for road embankment widening, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, construction erosion of loose or unprnterted cuts and fills may occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Currently, 79' wide roadway x 2500' length represents 55,000 SP impervious cover.•- roadwav adds 35.00 SF_of__impervirnis rnverage f r_ a total of 90,000 SF. • - . • . • . -4- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Common T.E.S.C.P. measures, ie. Hydroseeding, check dams, ponds, silt fences and other measures as necessary are required by the contract proposal. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Only short -term emissions during Construction. No increase is anticipated in CO 2 . b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction specifications will limit hours of Construction activity. The work will be watered to keep dust minimized. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described • waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Oescribe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following . chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Construction generated runoff will be diverted to a temporary holding pond and then released to the City storm system once the heavy debris have settled out. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters ?. If so, generally describe. Yes, however, the project specifications and TESCA (Temporary Erosion_ Sedimentation Control Plan) will help prevent waste material from entering the ground and surface water systems. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See.: C, 2. Above. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other . water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil. other' _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some ornamental vegetation along the reads ;dP will be lost in the pros yri,In; the rnad c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any Existing landscaping will be replaced with like -kind, both on impacted private�roperty and behind sidewalks on public right -at-way. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Squirrels and miscellaneous rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. list any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for .heating, manufacturing, etc. Petrochemicals utilized for construction equipment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, . generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Fumes from internal rnmhustinn Pingines may prove noxious during hours of rnnstr„rtinn This will be A jhnrt -term unnart, 1) Describe special .emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Limited hours of construction stipulated in the specifications. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Macadam Road is heavily traveled by nearby multi- residential dwellers as well as people accessing the shoEeing center and Interurban Avenue. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term: Heavy equipment noise from 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Long -term: Increased traffic after the project is completed will generate more automobile related noise. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short -term: Limited Construction hours Long -term: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Adjacent to Macamam Road - Multi- residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Varies - Single Family to Multi- Residential classes. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? High- density residential to low- density residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A Traffic Count Analysis has been completed and future growth impacts have been considered. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building 'material(s) proposed? 3Q Fget Luminaires b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None - Lumi nai re pl arement pond'1e*-9 vie impact c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Aesthetic. impacts Tai11 ba short -term and typical of road coDstruct- 4.0a-r h" completed prnjert Vi l l unclude_a_pazazzzlan imprnvPmPnt {„sidewalks)_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Street liminaires will be installed and the new traffic signal will add new light at the intersection of Macadam and Southcenter Boulevard. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, the new traffic signal will imErove safety and luminaire light distribution has been analyzed and found to be acceptable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use of cut -off type luminaires will concentrate light on street. Normal 30foot pole height will also help reduce glare as will selective sighting of each luminaire for maximum benefit and minimum impact. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Macadam Road is located near Tukwila City Park and Fort Dent Park. Bycycle trails will be incorporated in the roadway. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. (See Site Plan.) b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro bus stops North and Southbound at South 152nd Street and mid block near South 150th. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 26 On- Street parking stalls would be created. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). _ The proposed project consists of improvement to the existing road. (See discussion under Item 11) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Current ADT is approximately 1600. Peak Hour is generally 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Signal installation at Southcenter Boulevard will mitigate existing and future impacts. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 1A • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: e ectricit atural •a e ephon rl„e Coble. Tv water s other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A storm sewer will be constructed and owned bythe__ City. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: f&6 Date Submitted: Harold Hagenson Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read then in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or . release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency.Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 'TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? T, „02to an improved transportation collector aerterial complete with sidewalks, bike lanes. i.ghting and traffic sigals as well as to improve storm drainage and provide an nutlet for the North Hill reservoir overflow line. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? To reroute traffic thnrugh annthar rnrri''r Since none exists. it would have to he rnnetriirterl One possibility would be to extend Sonth 157nd Si-rapt Reservior overfl• ate locations and /or pumping potentials are not feaaihle 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Any alternatives would require extenCive PnginPPrirg evaluations, land acquisition; and, more than likely, higher construction costs than the prnpnaal Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Ooes the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- P AL XV AL'a ALA JL \\\ . Golf Course • 7,ALE PROJECT LOCATION Southcenter Blvd. Race • :.7" Track ••••• • • • • 4� Srorgon yl Maevao.. A%A • h r� c.77 CB 22 •T.X7e z -45 775 EE. qo 7f.47 - /6' Cmhd CB 2/ T O I(-- iB Tqqoo 79.0 fE.71.6 0 hr 770 E bdxf - Canned/ As spore Bose Rtgelgo) /nw 7762 Rep- p inlet 20 10 0 20 4o SCALE IN FEET M0TE3: 1. ALL WORORASNIP AND 1OTERIALS SHALL RE IN Cd/010MMCE MITN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS PAD CITE OF NOICA STANDARDS. E. SEE DtTAILS FOR SIGNING AND STRIPING. KETONE ALL CONFLICTING SNIPS MO STRIPING. 3. 'CONTRACTOR SHALL 000NOIRATE WORM AM SCHEDULE WITH 3IMALITATIU ARO RESERN0IR CONTRACTORS WHO WILL K CO COCTIMG SINXLTAMEOXS NNRR. A. SAYLLT OR MHEEL COT A'•MEET LINE. AT THE EDGE OF PANERAT FOR 1122 LENGTH OF PROJECT PRIOR TO SORGRADE PREPARATION. 0525 7vp 5 Top 65.0 /.E. 85./4 6/.0«.r arse, F/ 40/4 LEGEND ® WHEELCHAIR RAMP • LIGHT POLE STANDARD B HANGNOLE CONDUIT ROn7 ROCKERY WALL EXISTING SIGN NEW OR RELOCATED SIGN W/ -1 (Om-) ICS) Ikefir 3 :I Top 69./5. ..:::64.75 -6. .. 50�E.. 84 7.:: ./. 72.ZS:50.. . � 0 -0'OO .p 7f.G9 -Z7'. .. ::. ' ::.!;... '':: .: i. ..73.61_.2. .. ... .. .. .... T38y -rp-w •BNOINEERINO• •WATBR•BBWBR•PARKB•BUILOINO• SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TO SOUTH 150TH ST. PLAN /PROFILE Rah i de. 41t 3 -667 7 20 10 0 20 SCALE i. FEET Rotoruhvcf Fence o Qtelf Mores oo 2' Min C/ nc fo Foos of Coed _ 5 . 9.50 re 40.50 C8-/54 r 7093( , 90.9.73 Fop fr30.4 97.83 \ cnt rb sa 4, a 8 6 wt Kat t.. �.. .. ...� .. - ..... \ me ter. ,....- ..... o tim 10 0 AVI�L :� weQMS SOM.. •ENOINeiA1N0• • WATrR• SEWEH. PAPKe•sUnLOlN0• consu ant- -s Um] H Duds O A • . 7.r. MACADAM ROAD SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TO SOUTH 150TH ST. PLAN /PROFILE Ira m IA N 6n inn 4h 3-07 50s4.02 110 AJjusl l0 awe* 20 .0 0 20 40 SCALE 14 MET N O ,ro "B_•s �2" 2 S. /4451 jam...- _ i.��o . M7/ J7 /if = Cow .Ay SD :._ 7ye M17 CNn 7b SO - - v.rfiSD'':� ! 1157/11 r p9.-7S am 10 20 79 %/r 6 Be /DZS- / /070 Re2eele by OM C to SO - C to SD • "wejutl Rep 4-/1111-45 B -/2A 7qe ao.45 ._.r M.�. - __..._.. _ ... . 1E /079 ( M SD Roc* Wo // SA' 3.72.600. _- Atr,74137 MeV, Exist /120 - -- Adjurt h bm* Con, 44 SO 7n+7 ASO. -: 1: 5 .. � hh ti , ' . `5 m a .p lu 0� r1 $c � '108 I ... h ... �U 166 100 I 08 is 0 'FMS" N•c. ,'t:: fG IOy e9- 106 4e /C@7 /• %2a;: /09.55 /77:22: 104 • ......I - • 98 ... i �.. ryPe -59 T ./0430 ........ en .102 • k O O.p I Exis7•.; ¢ bed! •I J tivah_,�I I: :118 1tl • . 55 '100 /B! -17'; OOIRBCP U 72°A•41111 5 /07.5(721 " 1 -.54 • ' 7 109.2(9 • 77DEDs 172Z'i De (' 7 1 •'Jdw 3 m- m 0 :I . 142 .._ ........i , 108 .........! . .. Tiae71- 54 -.... • ... To 05.18 . " / /0974 • I • .. I ; ... 1406 .. .. .. , . . . . .L CI:: ..... .... .. L, .,.•...:. Z.: ::: 4'.74N o :: .. . IL 1- L A611g16TE weQMs eEATw wNO1Nww1a1N0• WATUR• wUWER• •1•11.1ILOINO• consu anus I 1 MACADAM ROAD HD Herr.• D.. o A SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TO SOUTH 150TH ST. PLAN /PROFILE w 4b v olob i 411 3 -07 • S0 /7.. 02 Abandon Aoyulre 4.-ealr • 20 :0 0 20 SCALE 18 FEET Aof6.00 C.;010 l0 /se- A•24 sA:. 20,30 . Pa0 of 116//•28'Rt rap /12 /20.50 • Abanabn • .•__ • .• if4 mis•03:4-0 •• • • 1.• 'sj '• • ‘j" ""•-- • 'RCP • 479.344, 2refAve- .Feof4,- 4o • .g•in-47-f */" • Sfa. /9•/I k3 4 126, . 1:1 .• ... ... •• .. . . ; . : • :: 124 • ; • Eire. 402 16a/1 577-‘24 Sta. /9-4S • 0084 Thp El. /22.0 II , . j Adjurf fa 5.-aa . j • - J:- • • . : :Act■' ........ • 1221 . ..... : . . : . 12011i ... . ... . j . . ........... . . . ...... ..... . . . . ........ . . 116 114 : • : ....... . ..... • • . : • : • : : • : • ..... : ...... • : : : • ... ..... 1: . I : : . • : • ;. Abasaber . . . ..j. • _ j j j t witTfiwjmiiwr.• de - : • /24-5'. Remove • - jj. 2,475E95 ,Adjeue. _. &wee '• Abandon- Sta. 22,67 a1,1-4011.277-4174-• L..= ; 00•••••• 150 " Raonerr CE10,0, -1,41-.2618Z - 2/7;e11- . • , . ....... . : : ..... :: • . . ..... . • • • • • • • • • • . oae4 ..... • • - • ......... ; ; ; ..... : Yoa/* 577-LDA .5»,. 2425 24. RA 70p 21 /300 128 : : : ..... 116 128 ............. . ......... 17,54 ...... . .... . ... //9.7612.7 ... ... . ... .... Ac, ' 7Y4e.C1-'54 74a. .8 3, /2-12252 112 : : .. : . : .... 1:1 ..... . : I j .... .... ......... ! • .54 T1/5.4113 116.42_ A22747 I j 4524 -12-17) 0 .... p • ... • a P 13611MINTE RAPEIMMO BEM.. ENQNEBRIN •WATER•BLWEICI•PARKB•BUILOINCI• m®nuItanl 1 MACADAM ROAD IED1 H D.wwit at A ... 1.< SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TO SOUTH 150TH ST. PLAN/PROFILE • • .... • • • • • • • • • • • ........ • ...... • • 0.• • • • ........... N.:: • • ...... .61 t\s• • ...... 4.1 • • 6:21 • 6s 6 MC( E- L RI es ,:tole 1 _411 3-67 50/4.J.Z • • i•� 20 10 0 20 SCALE IN FELT 131 1321 ........... 0 W q h' ............. :12.1 ......... .........:... • • I I 1 • i ........ ......... ...... . ......I l 1 ISIAMIITE BOAT. •ENOINEERINO• •WATER•BOWER• •BYILOINO• . .........i.... ... III consu ant ^s MACADAM ROAD Marlow D.w.. O A I.. SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TO SOUTH 150TH ST. PLAN /PROFILE ■ aft OEN 4h 3.87 .10/6.02 }