Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-21-87 - RENTON SAND AND GRAVEL - TOP SOIL MIXING AND SCREENINGRENTON SAND & GRAVEL TOP SOIL MIXING & SCREENING 1602 MONSTER ROAD EPIC -21 -87 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 December 9, 1987 Rick Beeler, Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: Id -..., ME DEC 111987 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the mixing and selling of top soils for Renton Sand and Gravel. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Linda Rankin of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459 -6763. Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section DJB: cc: Linda Rankin AFF•DAV IT OF DISTRUTION Wendy Bull [I Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting [I Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [I Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [[ Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet hereby declare that: J[ Determination of Nonsignificance and checklist O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice I_[ Notice of Action [[ Official Notice J Notice of Application for J Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit J Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on November 24 , 1987. Renton Sand & Gravel 55 SW 12th Renton, WA 98057 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review SEction Shorelands Division Mail Stop PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Washington State. Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review SEction SEPA Division Mail Stop PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Renton Record Chronicle for publication Name of Project RENTON SAND & GRAVEL File Number EPIC -21 -87 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal top soil mixing and screening Proponent Renton Sand and Gravel Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 1602 Monster Road (vacated) SWZ 24 -23 -4 Kroll Page 335 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -21 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Ei There is no comment period for this DNS L[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address Date Planning Director 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tuk Z� 9U Signature Phone 433 -1846 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department ( ) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency ( )Dept. of Social and Health Services ()Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division (X)Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * ( )Department of Game ( )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations KING COUNTY AGENCIES Dept. of Planning & Community Devel. Fire District 18 Boundary Review Board Health Department ( ) South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ) Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone ) Seattle City Light Washington Natural Gas ) Water District 75 ) Seattle Water Department ) Group W Cable ) Kent Planning Department ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ) - Public Works ) - Parks and Recreation ) - Police ) - Fire ) - Finance ) - Planning /Building ) ) ) )Fire District 1 )Fire District 24 ( )Building & Land Development Division SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES )Puget Sound Power & Light )Val -Vue Sewer District )Water District 20 )Water District 25 )Water District 125 )Union Pacific Railroad CITY AGENCIES )Renton Planning Department )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: )- Edgar Bauch )- Marilyn Stoknes )- Joe •Duffie )- Mabel Harris )- Charlie Simpson )- Jim McKenna )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce ) Daily Journal of Commerce ) Renton Record Chronicle ( )METRO Environmental Planning Division Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more MEDIA ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times "'toy() rmr YCu &c c c6nc dJ , PIr "Tom, , kJA , PD Vag e�� gosdi po9 ;;9a -& i 4-09. 10 - ? -g47 E/c'c euia, Phv, , &of, rIi. 0)1-4,/66 -Pz,.e% -.c.u/.f& -Fo- loacCe( q',51-e-l-.r 0,42 Aw-e - Lno 61.bar?/-6,, �ou-� 6cuu,e) c..17r-e -ecC, � dmsn.a..�o l-� L/pvat I; --ftrumcai 6.60Aariz- 5ecexabee.12e/Ledd-0 O‘A(cluik5,09, (/Q! C0u)/ » crul a, (u)a- / - !! -- Qived /.0°` oz) &WIG 6}474 )19A°7a'tht .055 - `ti(JG �?� inemZ A - 3", ‘.rri cr-( ippActivt 10-04 :At 7,00.6_64) 'U�zQ.i��_ary Q.u,L — 0'114 Sz�CPi !/GCc-eL Cc.i2&Cc.viC..2� (16V (p/GP • • • M P. 64616-- LA,Lut :4 4_ 'i''6 617drm iet,ufq 1 (11116 ra--e d L4'11/1 . eli(Gt /aft? 0 (1' .65 °Ai (J)4/ -10/6 a' a -,e)t-ea,oa,47/0x- , /1 0“-ect_ be„ Gteil,12eteLL _ t PO 5,5 \50rnigboq,) eati4 6 Vaei 6(e,&9 ./1. e t() Con-6e, c/a_n A°7/1 3 vt-t-t) LA) vtu, a_ Con az,z,t Graeg(, cci-eA." 064, -4/Lezct, Cb aW (410ti- cf,a, haloAdoxidi L1/-the_;cei vrk. (jit, y, k9A-H Jan-i-to=b' .Con CW7 46) (17/14.4/16e - vt,,,-/A4;1- 6f 0714 ok (ezit-it?-eo i y - 6 2-d AAA-4J ,_. 1,v / , . ae, ci'iliy.tca-Oit (1d,6t/AlLea_,L_ *afro.- ci o beA/74.fie-rarct . jA,61,u,a/Aq ,,Idt-ci,a, i i's-t-4 6ua-bi / u-.-4 c/U,Lin ' eqiciztx._ 0-it , r / li , 69:(LeLf agi - pv co e cc v/r( 91. 1W,v) cpx, 91- e4,,)Irrea,Z-7./t, Ceri 4•OTE. LtituLa06-ix bLV-tid ect asCe 614, DC.69(e,cY 6eitiJAJA , La9v7t /5 -C-K071/t Vevld qo' saloou_&C eOnC- Qa/U c60/01- CITY OF TUKWILA ,CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM Co • CN EPIC '07/ FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: El BLDG nj PLNG 1 P.W. El FIRE n POLICE PROJECT 1 f1`ie971 a.1 ld 0zwe/ LOCATION /602 ittOr `617 6616/ FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED Q f i9g &R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY g e3 7(�� 4 /.1;fa .r�/ Y STAFF COORDINATOR 4/1.' / RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN EPIC '07/-1511 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [ j BLDG ri PLNG ( P.W. El FIRE n POLICE El P & R PROJECT w 707 1 4s lC6 0av / LOCATION 1/ 0 oa it bhX � � FILE NO. ( DATE TRANSMITTED Q /( Il g RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Z7 e 8 7(be STAFF COORDINATOR /tb//SQeari/73'4'i /• RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMEN Ci Cat., COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM t) V \ ill CN EPIC ' „, frg- f FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: ri BLDG [1 PLNG ./ 1 P.W. FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT mirky) LOCATION leooa DATE TRANSMITTED D il r- /9'g STAFF COORDINATOR /(.( lei41 4U'� THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING TH IS PROJECT PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. FILE NO. is -i6 - e7 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY S sle (9 (iiLS..:✓ RESPONSE RECEIVED /0 - 9 - 8 7 ITEM COMMENT ;G_,-, G g e/e✓ tic <Ps AAlf �i I 50 Pe et o f «,,.-, 6vs // (/- s fir ms z The c ;6_ OC 7 4.,, /a w; /1 //671^' Ct � �ov2 ro��►v( fAti J (''1 2 ,e ePss 0r ii) /. v► i s c r e ti v sf 6-e do,-,6/--e vva. Pei c� �►UI cu. ./A.,,(1 c DATE /d- 7-- r7 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Fj BLDG El PLNG 1 P.W. ri FIRE n POLICE V1 P & R PROJECT 6 .tc/ zve j LOCATION /(,Da NOn6 k PSG ' FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED �D J2& /9'0 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY g C ?C.1 C� 7�1) STAFF COORDINATOR /2bf/ear// 73i411-: / RESPONSE RECEIVED J7m� Lc) . CN EPIC 'Al 'et FILE THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE l0 8r 1,17 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Con. No. Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 4.4 4 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: - cre,Pgo.feeie 2. Name of applicant: RE /I/Tc N .r.0 arc 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:S.5-1'U/ /Z- `v-7 17160, ae- arc Ooe,g2,o1 l3YlCk 4. Date checklist prepared: . i/> f/8 , 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ADGI, i ./ RiQo dve err 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.( Aesci 4)/ 4,01444/44/e rZ/, ffX /s T/ ,C.7ol. rr V- ao.0.<' AtirR ti nAri #y /,tea X' — . /Ai191, 117'` ow-. / am/ 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.______________ iv,z 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ok4g 1 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for our •ropo�. 41724Tair' -- 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thfl checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do nor need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 1 2 44o Act nVee x.741 �, �% —2i c1/ , ZG io tL? d, Ln 3 f'e / 4 LJ .,5 . v- q i i� ems ;Z q d V- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? ;TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICIIII • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2i■o,e 73A44 — 1)77bAr SL `,ate c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. *441 r-04 ,u c/ 6 L P414•14:,4 r 7re� d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. _A6 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ,4a 1*Ljt „Nq boo 41- / iff 0%ot frvecA rr A iQ , ffrr /9o.�76f 4ler.? d, Z#v e- f. .Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. 14Q0t/oit/ it) "17 A 7,,rrae.Z,4s AS g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? )X„y,E • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the, earth, if any: ores r<( ee4± 4 u a y 5 L.0Gk to Lk 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if .known. 27/457—, -1 d s. i70 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your.,proposal? If so, generally describe. Soap lk vdrE T/e,00'7'&7417 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other: _impacts to air, if any: 00.777/e.g 'J'Y Ir AVOW Nx 'ANAets �.1 /o/A P tit .7-y f .ipc . 0/r 3. Water a. Surface:. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. ,SA5r.,e l? i v.404 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. v,Er -- S'7m•2A .4. 9P S ,X f 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material - that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. O /6/1/ 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. /44 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. i3"t . Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. ,Ya 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. M,u4 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. c7ri /am GG.a7Wijr !,47 Alec' 7 Rkr z iy / _ asczt( 4F- e''o,� • 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. /16 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 02 A** y,ge _pe,■ 4 Z�c.. La e� „ctt LLpAki es) om ckut s( L- 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass jirl pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A%©,/iIg c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. /'t(8 , Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Nee Al If 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. X®K,E c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Al X • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. I, rer l-'-X4eitd�4st,V4 ,I ,Re.04 Fmwri< .512e_ 'no 4.__S Ave _hi4 ;47:V Ai R b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Nm,tt6- 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any including exposure and explosion, spil occur as a resul describe. environmental health to toxic chemicals, ri 1, or hazardous waste, t of this proposal? N4 hazards, sk of fire that could If so, 1) Describe special emergency seripices that might be required. ?ra=nia -t,_ Aessi fj, 0T D F' /�?2 !� is 4' ;S'ti/.o Y Ala i /4 Y 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: i/1 Af ez VA u AS 1pmS,6'�',�.(,� , ',VA* o !/!* ilror AtiY .e2ARQ /o4d mAr. i' LS • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? j 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term. or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ,VoRAiA1 Ou % Y,¢uC.k 7- rP#eC • .71;.= A ' �� AM a f 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: A4 . Mite ltiwArier "!'- 7�u�kS 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? � Ss e iC J!!� xidieg• >� i�► - pit`s72C/12 'ease A/o Ny�s.Q a APO Alt k aTY t Ar7 Glr )reS't AT Agec.ec.S' b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. �,� 7-r,(, , �� /»nr nr Erii Air .^ -se j/Ar.1, HI J , i AS H thAS gE Pia d ; 1.c -.a_L 0,,.cic% c. Describe any structures on the site. Ho �'7.Q�tci61.�' al ira045 AO A4 AlPrze A4*_ *el Ao Ae � e4 J ; L oQ.� / vida.5 jv ,char s. ve e 4e Zey rhos. • , Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What site? is the current 4 , fr zoning classification of the f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 1�m k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: AL/e444% 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ecmialLy Ultra ` ztba7, w 4,3%/-1-44/zrfral rbotiv) 9.es -6114wMt.t._ • • Evaluation for 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. b k g c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: JYte,x 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Agency Use Only ..DUB wI(/ MA) t b /o diyi- amtL (OK c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ?sr b``ea- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ,N° c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal ?1'tg, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: kio, ov 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? oRT .00,y PAAK xGt b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. n/o c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the or applicant, if any: • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. e b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: a tx 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 6.41 cdy WA/ b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance.to the nearest transit stop? yos c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? .P/ • • - Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Nn e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. jy a f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 5e _9 Al, ;.;319 Vien g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Wet/0_ 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. PVe, b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N.-- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently av bl- the site: e ec ricity natural gas; ater efus service, telephone, sanitary sewer, sep is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its deci ion. J D� Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. Now would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such incr ases are: Pr/17 ./Af AR A912 !? �)(7k 6-m 15i4 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect,plants, ani- (0 Y1r. V�. mals, fish, or marine life? d(��� 5�• (QV(. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine /life are: Pzd7 A- 7, e t , t esti at • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? loo Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 0-eao ev 014 LL 77, )Al 424 7# Q kr _ a �7 ,Fd2? v�� 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? M2 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: C o L o a r L.h..i 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or lie L7? �/ encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with ,ft)iE- leti ( aria A" existing plans? N o low* idatr • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: )l/oA _. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? -6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 0 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: pal &,ci,y 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. .gyp • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 44 Oat .T0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? ird; 7.`:17/41 e .44 J2i4 l( /s, J i S i--i isL X S 10 4(.416 NJOY 4t z A "PtAri,vi .,e 7 8J/ Afel /'rvyv 7e5/e) Sm :4.s- Y , 049 : /n4 7; 4' C 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? t'bILI L' 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: ,14 ,044 t. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? WI!) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- 1334 87 3\ AKER�S \VA CA "E D k4Ay 5, \ \ \ \ ,9344 k. • \ \ 404- r _o NP I RR )iOO -51t9 N ,- 0,10-x315 1919 evy by Town of Tukwi BDRY LN AGREEMENT KC CAusE NO. 725 392 ( La14e1-- .5 -\ 0-73) WHITE - GREEN RIVER (OLD LOCATION L33 I 50294.9i •TATE To S r ( L.CO. c 43Z9A09 0° 4329/a 0? 5611 -S 9C08 �A" 1...lNE ftioSt 4344Als /4o_ CJAMESA.NE LSO PA RD.) S. 153R0 ST. (zet1T0Ni - _sUNCTICiN WQ M7 1 X5. n .NI 50 55 E 306 34 A N w1 s N° N