The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-21-89 - KLOHN LEANOFF - RIVERSIDE INNRIVERSIDE INN FOUNDATION STABILIZATION ALONG THE DUWAMISH RIVER EDGE 14060 INTERURBAN AVE. S. EPIC -21 -89 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal RIVERSIDE INN FOUNDATION STABILIZATION BY RIPRAP ALONG THE DUWAMISH RIVER EDGE. Proponent KLOHN LEANOFF, CONSULTING ENGINEERS Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 14060 INTERURBAN AVENUE S. NE 1/4, NW 1/4 SECTION 14 TWN 23, RGE 4 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 21 -89 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [� There is no comment period for this DNS El This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by AUGUST 23. 1989 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below., Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Dates i� �� 2* O y Signature Phone 433 -1846 T k. !� 1441P You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • City of Thk iiI a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Ross A. Earnst. P.E. Director August 18, 1989 Mr. Dick Regan Klohn Leonoff 12006 - 98th Avenue Northeast Suite 102 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Dear Mr. Regan: RE: Riverside Inn Foundation Stabilization Thank you for exchanging so many calls on repairing the Riverside's foundation. Your assistance in coordinating our work and the rockery with King County's Surface Water Management and the County crews has been instrumental in completing this task. The City requests an access easement to the County's dike easement; and access on the 58th storm drain alignment for access to the rock work and storm drain if there is a 58th right -of -way problem. Thank you for obtaining Benny's approval to these two easements. Could you please provide a letter confirming that they will be signed? We are double- checking with the County to allow delivery of the 57th Avenue rocks until September 15. We are also working with the rockery contractor for the same date. Delivering the 57th rock will benefit Benny, the County and the City's contractor. The Flood Zone Control Certificate has been faxed and the original is enclosed. It will need to be completed and returned to Becky Davis, Permit Coordinator. You can stop by for my signature or Becky can call me. I will sign the Grade /Haul Permit and it will be ready for you. Thank you again for the coordination assistance on the rocks and the easments. Sincerely, C'ot LiDy j.ac ny PIN e404,1411"" Fiske -a 7V/do fre/4. s Ron Cameron, P.E. City Engineer RC /kjr CC: Becky Davis ! ar_ren . Wi 1 son. File: Riverside Development CITY OF TUKWILA • III CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE TO: PROJECT LOCATION REVIEW ROUTING FORM 0 BLDG fj PLNG 1ZV) eR, S ra.e._ t N IJ P. • n FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R 14Dba I n 46>64 DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR pojen . so. FILE N0. gg -1y RESPONSE REQUESTED BY g /y /iq RESPONSE RECEIVED // THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT • FI5 i4CtlaS l4yeRg4 I c. pee mgt as. Abry Cots. lirxi e Sel 4,09i /.0/.5e4-4.01 5'09 this s GRme /Fill pebibt DATE g /gffy COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 tIAI R UAL I LUIIIJ INSUIIANI;I I'IIU(JIIAM POST CONSTRUCT ELEVATION CERTIFICATFJFLOODPIOFING CERTIFICATE COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 INSTRUCTIONS The registered professional engineer, architect, surveyor or community permit official completes Section I below. Section II may be completed by any of the professionals listed at the beginning of Section II, or by a similarly qualified local permit official. Print or type the information on this form. This form is to be used for new (POST -FIRM) construction and for substantial improvements to existing structures in Zones A1-A30, AH and V1 -V30 and existing (PRE -FIRM) buildings to be rated under POST -FIRM rules and rates. SECTION 1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY COMMUNITY PERMIT OFFICIAL) PROPERTY ADDRESS (or lot and block numbers if address is unavailable) FIA MAP PANEL ON WHICH PROPERTY IS LOCATED 326 OF 650 FIA MAP ZONE IN WHICH PROPERTY IS LOCATED AE FIA MAP EFFECTIVE. DATE SEPTEMBER 23, 1988 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AT THE PROPOSED SITE 18. START OF CONSTRUCTION DATE AUGUST 21, 1989 Name and Title RON CAMERON, P.E., CITY ENGINEER PHONE (with Area Code) (206) 433 -0179 ADDRESS (Signature) (Date) SECTION II Complete only the Elevation elevation. If floodproofing completed by a registered completed by a registered INSTRUCTIONS Certification unless the building has been floodproofed Certification. The Elevation or surveyor. The Floodproofing at least to the base flood Certification may be Certification may only be is used, complete only the Floodproofing professional engineer, architect, professional engineer or architect. ELEVATION CERTIFICATION I certify that the building at the property location described feet, NGVD (mean above has the lowest floor at an elevation of sea level). I certify to the best of watertight to an elevation impermeable to the passage hydrodynamic loads and and uplift forces associated In the event of flooding, FLOODPROOFING CERTIFICATION my knowledge, information, and belief, that the structure of feet NGVD (mean is designed sea level), capability depths, intervention so that the structure is with walls substantially of resisting hydrostatic and pressures, velocities, impact ?* of water and structural components effects of buoyancy that would be with the base flood. will this degree of floodproofing be having the caused by the flood achieved with human Will the structure be occupied • If the answer to both questions certification must be completed *Floodproofed with human level occur, unless measures doors and windows). as a residence? is Yes, the floodproofing cannot be credited for rating purposes and the elevation will enter the structure when floods up to the base flood to prevent entry of water (e.g. bolting metal shields over instead. intervention means that water are taken prior to the flood CERTIFIER'S NAME AFFIX SEAL OR WRITE PROFESSIONAL LICENSE NO. BELOW: TITLE ADDRESS (Signature) (Date) Thn innmirnnro ^nunt ftM^n i,.,e N,.. a . . ..1 u._ __.__I _._J I-- for new (POST -FIRM) construction or substantial improvements. Be sure that the second copy Is certified. INSURANCE AGENTS MAY ORDER THIS FORM CITY OF TUKWILA � w CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC EPIC -21 -89 FILE 89 -4 -SMP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG ri PLNG P.W. ri FIRE 0 POLICE ri P & R. PROJECT RIVERSIDE INN LOCATION 14060 INTERURBAN AVENUE S. FILE NO. 89 -4 -SMP DATE TRANSMITTED 8-2 -Rq RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -9 -89 STAFF COORDINATOR DARREN WILSON RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT )5( ('c )s e w a /4 ay s24 neci fold a )4r., Y? pad Px tr / 41fiiiik7 c4/167 /47/0 ?If P 1 n Font, ` -i ii 7Qr -� J��,2 �j cam, i 9 / e1f4',Li O b 11Q fceP,Pc.. DATE V-t9/?? COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • A/4c 0 CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC EPIC -21 -89 FILE 89 -4 -SMP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. (l FIRE Q POLICE J P & R PROJECT RIVERSIDE INN LOCATION 14060 INTERURBAN AVENUE S. FILE NO. 89 -4 -SMP DATE TRANSMITTED R -2 -Rq RESPONSE REQUESTED BY $ -9 -89 STAFF COORDINATOR DARREN WILSON RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT AeMW1141 -1/ 11, 4(l /A) o7t VA--„AP,a/L- 6,0 `-77117 ALei 1,4act% DATE �14 y COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM f�- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM - -- TO: 0 BLDG J] PLNG P.W. n FIRE 0 POLICE f21 P & R CN EPIC EPIC -21 -89 FILE 89 -4 -SMP PROJECT LOCATION RIVERSIDE INN 14060 INTERURBAN AVENUE S. DATE TRANSMITTED R -2 -R9 STAFF COORDINATOR DARREN WILSON FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 89 -4 -SMP 8 -9 -89 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 8- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • KLOHN LEONOFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS jUL 241989 Our File No: PW0174 0301 July 19, 1989 City of Tukwila 6200 South Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw, Department of Community Development Dear Ms. Bradshaw: This letter is in reply to our phone conversation concerning exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit for a project at the Riverside Inn located at 14060 Interurban Avenue South. Exemption is requested for the placement of a foundation stabilization berm, and riprap necessary to protect the berm from future erosion. This work is required to stop the ongoing riverbank erosion which has compromised the structural integrity of the north (riverside) foundation wall. This work will provide the resistance necessary to regain the stability that the natural river bank provided prior to the erosion. The north foundation wall is constructed from 3 feet by 1 feet steel sheet pipe driven to elevation -7.0 msl as shown on enclosure 1. (taken from the original plans). Our calculations, based on topographic conditions surveyed in June 1989 show that this piling is unstable; however, at this time we are unable to note signs of distress. This may be due to the three dimensional effect of the structure and other constraints that could be acting at the top of the wall. However, enough is known about the condition of the wall to conclude that the foundation is in distress and further erosion will only compound the problem. Based on our assessment of the foundation pile stability, immediate remedial action is required to prevent further erosion and failure. Enclosure 2 is our Technical Memorandum on the analysis of the existing piling wall Klohn Leonoff Inc., 12006,- 98th Ave. N.E., Suite 102, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Telephone: (206) 823 -6529 • Fax: (206) 823 -6452 • and Enclosure 3 are the plans and sections depicting the proposed corrective work. A hydraulic analysis has been accomplished to examine the river characteristics, (water surface elevation, velocities etc) during the 100 -year flood with and without the stability berm and riprap. The purpose of this analysis was to determine if the project would produce undesirable effects to the adjacent and upstream properties and to complete design parameters. The analysis shows that the project does not effect the water surface profile at all; however, the project does increase the average velocity slightly but not enough to result in erosion of the unprotected stream banks in the immediate area. This increase in velocities attenuates to no change a short distance away from the project site. Enclosure 4 is our technical memorandum on the hydraulic analysis. An environmental check list has been completed and is returned as enclosure 5. Feel free to contact me concerning any additional information or coordination you may require. I can be reached at 823 -6529 or 392 -2125. Yours very truly, KLOHN LEONOFF INC. 4-401-e&i KLOHN LEONOFF Richard ( ick) egan, P.E. Principal Consultant . I L �, -24 1999 €7t g ,EANYIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �4 Cont., .1 No. Epic File No. EPIe: -/r Fee $100.00 Receipt No 0(2- A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Riverside Inn Foundation Stabilization 2. Name of applicant: Mr. Bennie Woyvodich 3. Address and phone number of appl ica�nt Ind c.ont4t person: 244-5400 14060 Interurban Avenue South, u wi a, A Contact-Person K. Regan 8/ 3 -bb29. 4. Date checklist prepared: July 19, 1989 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing if applicable): Accomplish work between mid - September and mid - October. 7. Do you have any plans for future.addi.tions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Nome 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your. proposal? If yes, explain. None -2- S 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila. Flood Control Zone Permit State of Washington. Fisheries Hydraulic Permit U.S. Armv Corps of Engineers. Section 10/ Section 404 Permit City of Tukwila Grading /Fill Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses . and the size of the project and site. . There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal..' You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. proitct involves placing approximately 1650 CY of upland fill to replace trodgd_Material on the river bank and placing approximately 450 CY of riprap on this fill to: protect the fill from erosion. This project covers approximately 214_111111 feet of river bank directly behind the Riverside Inn and is required to provide stability to the foundation of the building. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient informationfor a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Project is located on the left bank of the Duwamish River at approximately River Mile 10.4, Directly behind the Riverside Inn located at 14060 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, WA 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1, Earth • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): .Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other RiVerhank b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 67% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ?. If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.' Silty sand is unstable to water erosive forces provided that erosive water ve oci ies exists. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Provide 1650 CY-of upland fill to provide restraint to the foundation wall of the steal-W. which at presen is.considered to bein distress and further erosion could result in structural failure. Approximately 450 CY of riprap will be placed to prevent erosion of the upland fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No, the constructed works will be stabilized by riprap. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None • Evaluation for h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or . other impacts to the earth, if any: The stabilization fill wil be protected trom erosion by riprap. 2. Air 3. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, . industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. dust and engine emiccinnc will nrrur during rnnctrurtinn - Nn miss-inns frnm rnmpletpd _prnjert_ b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control if required Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what . stream or river it flows into. Duwamish River a tributary to Puget Sound. Agency Use Only 0 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 .feet) the described waters? If yes, please- describe and attach available plans. Yes, see attached plans 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No dredge material, 1650 CY of upland fill 450 CY of riprap.over a 240 ft length oft-NU-bank. the bank height averages approximately 15 teet. 4) Will : the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ypc, tha 1ffl_ypar flnndplain is at apprixmatply plpvatinn 1R 4. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, . describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.No Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, • and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following . chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) .Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm . water) and method of collection and disposal., if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into otherN�aaters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Nn. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None Required 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed_ or altered? some small native shrubs. one tree + 4" dia. and blackberry bushes, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on,: or near the site. None known Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:Iliprap surface will be backfilled *DEPARTMENT OF FISHIERS with top soil material and native shrub anted NEEDS TO DETERMINE THE VEGETATION RESTORATION. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known . c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Salmon d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Planting of shrubs on the river bank and placing '. of large rocks at the toe of the riprap to_provide aquatic habitat. • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal ? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: .traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Truck and heavy equipment during construction. No noise pon completion. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Truck and heavyeegui ment durin construction-- on during normal working ours a pmM n rough Fri. for no longer than 1 month. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Business bolt course on opposite bank of the riven.: b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Large framed. one and two'story for restaurant and large parking area. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Nn -.LJUOILillig way on rear of building must be temporarly removed for construction access. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M1. Light Industrial _ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial • g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes - entire river bank i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Insures compatibility with the existing and projected land uses by providing stability to . the existing structure. -12- 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income. housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether .high, middle, or low - income housing. one c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: none -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would It mainly occur ?. None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Stream hank fishing b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including: recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N • . 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, :. national, state, . or local preservation: registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Puget Sound Elect. RR at tront of site b. Generally describe any .landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts if any: None - — 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Tntnrurhan A lama Snuthr T -4f15 and T -� b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YPc c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when pea volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- Pa Konen impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need. for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Np b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts,on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. C e utilities currently a able at the site: _ 1 • s (efuse service e' one sanitar sewer septic system, other.. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None required C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision._ Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICS E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS Evaluation for Agency Use Only The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To rovide a foundation stabilization berm tor; reTtraint to the sheet pile toundation wall wnicn in its present condition is seriously in distress. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Construct .a very deeply.driven butressed pile wall with interties to the existin• •ilin• wall to prevent under- mining an restraint to t e exis ing pi ing wa is would require'the use of floating heavy equipment; :cranes, pile drivers, etc. and the placement of large rock along-' the toe to prevent erosion and erovide fish habitat. No' other methods out side of building removal and construction:. with a deeper foundation wall -appear possible. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The proposed stabilization berm and riprap is:.tne most cost effective method to provide corrective action. The butressed piling structure wouia De aestneticalry unpleasing throughout the structural life where as the stabilization berm and riprap will oe planted with :. na ive s rues an in a ew growing be highly.visable. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what po.l i- cies of the Plan? Unknown.. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s), are: •23 119.03.05 - Option 3, Partial Density Transfer and Partial Development of Hillside Areas When the developer elects to develop a portion of the open space hillside area and to retain as permanent open space other portions of the area, the following provisions shall be used: Applicable Development Standards: All hillside density trans- fer proposals shall comply with Section 119.03.03 for density that is to be transferred and Section 119.03.04 for develop- ment within the hillside boundary area. Section 119.04 - Approval of the Density Transfer Plan The Director shall approve density transfer plans that are consistent with this section. Section 119.05 - Effective Date The decision of the Director shall become effective on the day the density transfer plan is approved. Section 119.06 - Appeals A decision of the Director may be appealed in accordance with the pro- ^ visions of Section 118. Section 119.07 - Fees Applications filed for hillside density transfer in accordance with this section shall be accompanied by fees as required by Section 120. [Section 119 added by Ordinance 83 -14, §1, passed February 23, 1983.] SECTION 119 - HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT, DENSITY TRANSFER Section 119.01 - Purpose To establish a mechanism that encourages density transfer from open space hillside areas as an incentive for preservation of natural resources and protection from ,natural hazards. Section 119.02 - Applicability Properties on Locke Cemetery Hill, IV Hill, or Bald Hill designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Open Space /Hillside may transfer density in accordance with this section. Once the allowable density and development standards for open space hillside areas are established pursuant to Section 119, the developer may utilize planned development, subdivision, or other Land Development Code provisions for obtaining development approval(s). Section 119.03 - Procedures and Standards 119.03.01 - Application a. All applications for a density transfer consistent with Option 1 or Option 3 shall be on forms provided by the Director and shall contain the following information: 1. Name and address of the owner or owners of record; 2. Location and use of adjacent structures within 100 feet of property lines; 3. Number of proposed lots and dimensions of lots, including frontage, depth, and area in square feet; 4. Type of housing or other uses to be developed; 5. A deed restriction executed on behalf of property owners assuring permanent retention of the density transfer land area as Open Space. Staff shall record this deed restriction with the Benton County Recorder in the event the density transfer application is approved. If the application is not approved, the deed restriction will be returned to the applicant; 6. Developers utilizing Option 3 shall also provide an iden- tification by survey and legal description of the land areas within the open space hillside area which are proposed for development and the land areas proposed for permanent open space. 119.03.02 - Selection of Development Option The developer of applicable properties may utilize either Option 1, 2, or 3 for determining the maximum allowable density and appli- cable development standards. Option 1 describes procedures and development standards for density transfer from the open space hillside areas. Option 2 describes procedures and standards for development within the hillside area. Option 3 describes pro- cedures and standards for partial transfer of density and partial development of the open space hillside area. 119.03.03 - Option 1, Density Transfer When density is to be transferred from the identified open space hillside area to other portions of the property, the following provisions shall be used: a. Allowed Density Transfer: The allowed density transfer of open space hillside areas is 4 units per acre. When density is to be transferred outside the hillside area to the remain- ing portion of the ownership, multiply the size of the area by . the allowed density transfer per acre (4 units per acre) to determine the total number of residential units that can be transferred from the hillside boundary area. b. Applicable Development Standards: When density is trans- ferred, the use types, minimum lot area, setback, height requirements, and other development standards of the RS -9 district shall apply and may be used for purposes of preparing the density transfer plan. c. Condition of Approval: As a condition of approval for density transfer plans, a deed restriction that assures permanent retention of the density transfer land area as open space shall be recorded with the Benton County Recorder within 30 days of the decision of the Director. 119.03.04 - Option 2, Development of Hillside Areas Without Density Transfer When the identified open space hillside area is to be developed, the following provisions shall be used: a. Calculate the Allowed Density: The allowed density for devel- opment of hillside area(s) is 2 units per acre. When the hillside area is to be developed, multiply the size of the hillside area by 2 units per acre to determine total potential residential units allowed within the hillside area. b. Applicable Development Standards: When the open space hill- side area is to be developed, the development standards of the underlying development district shall apply. r'. Lt'ATION PLAN -k t f 4\ , \l ,v,.. -I ; ��.- .�r�!��z� �_ I,e,/('/ P >t V"ry.:. 1T=1 llr Alig, 1..,‘ W1.....--TN0iV Ilk PROJECT LOCATION FROM: THE THOMAS GUIDE, 1988 EDITION, PAGE 34. LEGEND; -4.80 17.24 • WALL TOE 2.68 9.26 *2.11 7.88 3.41 • -0.2 0.73 GOLF COURSE APPROX. TOP OF RIGHT BANK CONCRETE WALL EXISTING BUILDING 18.5* MATCH EAST. GRADE 22. BLDG BLDG %.67 '1.50 b.o3 3.45 -3.44 -0.8$ - 1.0Z - 0.59 • -1.59 9 D A TSflNO X1.75 NEW EMBANKMENT WRH RIPRAP E--1 DUSTING RIVER BANK N 11& Elio. OF FINISHED GRADE PROPERTY UNE COMMON BUILDING UNE -2.1$ •8.87 ELEV. OF COSTING GROUND ELM 1. SURVEYED BY Sr ENGINEERS. 8/15/89 -2.8 8.311 2.75 -2.11 -2.70 -2.2g -1.9. -1.38 DUWAMISH RIVER • -1.82 -3.88 -2.01 -2.74 ,-231 RIVERSIDE INN 18.09 1 .7� 8 •16.02 8. SHEET PILE FOUNDATION WALL WALKWA REMOVE FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS REPLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED M O ivAND DM1rIM All[ .Y�If1Tm ICI M 001r*D4I11L 0/ 00* OL T ITPoll ARM Mao AuThl t O ARM I Via? AIOY 0* 11mMD0 S qAI RO0*1U AND . REI DIVm Parma Dust ASPHALT PARKING SCALE r � Y� PROPERTY LINE KLOHN LEONOFF INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE INN FOUNDATION STABIUZATION LOCATION MD SITE PLAN MR. BENNIE WOYVODICH 14060 INTERURBAN AVE. SOUTH TUKWILA, WA 98188 DATE OF ISSUE RR PROJECT No OWL Na PW 0174.01 1 5 3 10 5 0 -6 -10 16 10 5 -a -10 LEFT BANK 16' RPRAP ROCK PILL 100 YR FLOOD LEVEL v APPROX. EL 164' MP) GASHED UNE IS APPROX. GROUND LINE NO1 L YE DUE TO 01:13E CLEAN ROCKFILI. BELOW W AT SHE OF CONSTRUCDON Cifil v 0.FLW. LEVE . APPROX. EL - 4.3' r MIN. MP) A RANDOM MANNER PROVIDE FSN (TI HABITAT P SECTION gin; ICIO rOUND MONT 9AHK 16' RPRAP 1.6 FILL ROCK VOIDS WTM ORGANIC SOIL AND PLANT WIN VARIOUS MITE SHRUBS ABOVE 041.1 0.N.W LEVEL APPRGX. EL - 4.3'(IYP) RFPORTED WSW Of ST . SHEET PILE. E].. -7.0' SECTION a 0 3 `a 10 0 -5 -10 -10 15 10 0 -5 -10 woos 01M10M10S All[ JtlldR}fta M 00801OIDOW...DII W11011 01 OUR MEW P011 A a6Oli0 A/D .W1H A- •DO o+is «" '.ION. ",., R"" ./ROY OR 1lWARD0$O OUR RIPON= NO DPAW ION O DODlv .RW PV * 1 DUI* a 12' MIN. 29 RIGF$ BANK 11r RPRAP (r'lP) RTED BOTTOM OF STFi. SHEET PILE. EL -7D' LEFT BANK R10NT BANK 20 15 10 6 0 -10 1' = 40' HORIZ. = 10' VERT. 0 -6 -10 5 1 KLOHN LEONOFF INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE INN FOUNDATION STABILIZATION CROSS SECTIONS °L'm MR. BENNIE WOYVODICH 14060 INTERURBAN AVE. SOUTH TUKWILA WA 98188 DATE OF ISSUE PROJECT No. RR DWG. Na PW 0174.01 2