Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-216-84 - KING COUNTY / PUBLIC WORKS - FOSTER BRIDGE REPLACEMENTFOSTER BRIDGE KC PW 52 Ave S @ Interurban Av S EPIC -21 Fi -84 NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW, notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila did on April 6, 1984 take the action described below. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, other otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced within 90 days or be barred. The action taken by the City of Tukwila notice of which is hereby given, was: Approval of design and Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for replacement of the Foster Bridge across the Duwamish River at 52nd Ave. S., east of Interurban Ave. S. Pertinent documents may be examined during regular business hours at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., City of Tukwila. Filed by Brad Collins, Responsible Official Published: Record Chronicle Date: April 15, 1984 April 22, 1984 %MC 197 -11 -1350 • • DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Foster Bridge Replacement Proponent King County Department of Public Works Location of proposal 52nd Ave. S. at Interurban Ave. S. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 216 -84 This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Responsible official Brad Collins Position /title Responsible Official Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845 Date ' V 10 (C1 r y Signature Published: Record Chronicle Date: April , 1984 la • Geet.1__I WAC 197 -11 -1350 Proposed DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Foster Bridge Replacement Proponent King County Department of Public Works Location of proposal 52nd St. at Interurban Ave. So. Lead agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 216 -84 9�0 This proposal has been determined not to have a probably significant adverse - impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). Thisdecision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. -This information is available to the public on request. Responsible official Rick Beeler Position /title Acting. Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Date Z31 (roc'`( Published: Record Chronicle, March 21, 1984 33 -1845 /( C. )Qu- kL�te; `1,vOZ,fEO) ,g/l9 /R1 ;ea, CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER WIC, CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROU TO: Q BLDG. 0 PLNG.. PROJECT AD DRESS 5 S Ate4U` A *al. S.., DATE TRANSMITTED. 2„ 1i le* RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY Z` d4 94. C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Wig. 5. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: FORM Q P.W. Q FIRE 0 POLICE. CONTROL NUMBER E14 •62.4 P.. & R. Q Q 0 Q:. 0 Q '•Q a Q Q 0 Q Q 0 Q a a D.R.C. REVIEW fi{&Q P AN rurry "ATE _ „'2- .2- rg PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ COMMENTS PREPARED BY_� j���....✓ PLAN APPROVED 0 C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROU, FORM TO: a BLDG. a PLNG. PROJECT ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED 2.1 PERMIT NUMBERWI L CONTROL NUMBER84 •a .j 2.1 ' P.W. a FIRE a POLICE a P. & R. C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR i4 �. RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY "2.11t184 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROERIATE COMMENTS IN THE. SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: [� ( i �� occ c-► ::u t. -rte ce-M,..g-k 11 .1 is (1 /1 1r a a a .a • a a a a � . a a a a a a El 17.34e00 D.R.C. REVIEW 44€4144.144 PLAN CHECK DATE Zl 7/ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY /�� PLAN APPROVED 0 C.P.S. FORM 2' ry OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBERWI C, CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUllk FORM (t%o 8. TO: [I BLDG. .(j PLNG. [I P.W. PROJECT ,ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED CONTROL NUMBER$4 •a2.q FIRE a POLICE a P. &'R. zit 1€14- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 2.11(4 a+ C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 4 5. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Q sr F OUQ C' rJ CER) IWcRC 001c.1£D b 4p) ►.i4 0 a ED DEs« -pis-4sE_ PLe er Fr.,ECT Q PEFIN ITV_ LW l W Cr p W I I Post-ER Ivar a a a 0 a . a - a 0 a 0 a 0 0 SWetXt., D.R.C. REVIEW fi6Q464744 PLAN CHECK DATE. 2- 2- $4- PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED COMMENTS PREPARED BY ealLae PLAN APPROVED a C.P.S. FORM 2 I;TY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBERWI C. CONTROL NUMBER$4.t2.1 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROU G FORM 2 a." 8• TO: tEt BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED 2111 PLNG. a P.W. a FIRE a POLICE a. P. & R. C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR gt(11. �. RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY RESPONSE RECEIVED z(i al �4 *1st PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN. THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE. LINES? ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED PLAN APPROVED a PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROU TO: PROJECT ,ADDRESS BLDG. FORM PERMIT NUMBERWI (.; CONTROL NUMBER$4.624 23(tww at* PLNG. Efl P.W. El FIRE Qr POLICE. DATE TRANSMITTED 2.1111a4 RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY 21 I tit 8 4 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 4 �. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Sao D.R.C. REVIEW f QUGID PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [] PLAN APPROVED [� PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 NOTE VICINITY MAP TAKEN FROM U.S.G.S. DES MOINES, WASHINGTON QUADRANGLE VICINITY MAP 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 SCALE IN FEET IAN 3 0 1984 CITY OE IU WiLA PLANNING DEPT. SHEET 1 OF 3 FOSTER BRIDGE NO. 3158 DUWAMISH RIVER MILE 9.2 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, . WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS Grote O .Pole ;lowing deck Meiio alltdkape to be removed, see Special CO. Provisbns :Pop / Cab -) 20'q / / (-- / / �,'• Oo /p/•n tnterton Ave Lire SIM /0.001 • 2-10" Yew N GV D REV. 1947 5/a. /0 #86 25 .-0 /3'0 Approach S /ob Gr. E/. 23.54 H 4 h E L11981 .\ Cu Fert ', `. 1 r 1 PLAN ` 8- e 0 6? 60 100 - SCALE IN FEET Brp. Abut./ , c"171 `\\ \\I r� \ s 293' - O Grrl to Out Approach Slobs /49'- O Brp. Pier 2 80'- 0 Fired P /VC S/o 12.03 m W 2 % 3./9X 200' VC. 5/0. /2 •73 Cr. E/. 23.53 Exp. : Brp Abut 3 ,2,0 u 25 0 Approoch S /ob *� C � Exp. Clearance 4.0' JAN 3 0 1984 CITY OF TUI vti+LA PLANNING DEPT. r\ / / ELEVATION 0 `Forecast /00 yeor flood e/ /5.5 Ordinary Mph Water el. 6 20 40 8 SCALE IN FEET SHEET 2 OF 3 0 /1 / 1 Clearance 33' / 1 / 5/0. /31-80 Gr. E/. 2023 -C/eoronce 0.7' FOSTER BRIDGE NO. 3158 DUWAMISH RIVER MILE 9.2 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS ...1-.. Sidewalk , , _ 1 • Lane ' 4 *Pa. 2.../fo'l Z:,.! 7 .8pa. g.... /f a' Iil . 8 ' /:01 I r 1/-*eil I .." ‘„,„.,:p./= 0•1 , 1,/:‘,1 13 -,e7d.,,Q,. I- i , I I '• ..• 1 1 i /2,-0 1gclay Ic: 0. F3' 44 :pa,..7 4'41: zZaann5glOpir 4501.: Lane 5h,/der !Curb a," , / Fl. AY , LL±J3 " //. „Sioue/-'4" 2.5pue'/-4. /'-!// /-6' 9 VJJ Lanai!" ,r5,u / /-'0' /14'1f-3:1101 I I 4.1.19/=4" ;.e.5pae/=4., 1 1 1/0"1/13. ; VO. /16. et (41?) 7- I !O , z p,j ff 5..i F IZ • I 5,0.1.C. /G* /8 - 3 Condu,Y5 e io• e. / o'' SECT/ON - BOX' G/RDER M/DSPAN • /0 PAUMfilLTIO JAN 3 0 1984] CITY OF TUKVTLA PLANNING bEP1. 20 30 40 50 • SECT/ON 60 70 02 80 SHEET 3 OF 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 SCALE IN FEET FOSTER BRIDGE NO. 3158 DUWAMISH RIVER MILE 9.2 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS Sio 29∎70 h /erurbon Ave. S eVEe6. r4 M'bNOUA i Z MAE tCLJA ezA 4 I =,.-0 Z° CALIPH(. FULL. '7z SPECIMENS 18' -0 ZOUSTUS ,•lYZ21D� crOzDy<,ek•s.5 FULL. I &AL. folyT Q°.yes CE.ANC f9 C.CArVnIUS EA- Le'GSL.ro w)LL I AL. PI -AIlT ». 31-0' 0.G. rww�4.J �9 / �NO- N!W yae HeoEP,A r�Llx 4` WT'S, 7 "5•a G. PC S/a/3r-6421 :I,ISH IVj L' Line He✓EZA 4' r`r . O. L. Wood frame S/ruoture 2 -S/cry, EJ oS. 'NVLC "NA iAm,rl(a5. -cr • Guard 11 era .e-l• P. "I t111 6,7 // /1 /l 1 1 %1(l t l l /it /. / / / / /•L' d/NE 1 ',.y�/ 111 I j. 1 _ 3u`7 5 vhe�0 `GGriP 1 1 / . \ / /J'P_LL 6 L /PLANTS 1j1 1l / {/1 //. \'Chlr /// •c' /0 G / / / I 1 I f,6 \.43 R/W �'��\ Il fa 5�e WA, V r. � Asphalt' Pork mg Lot 5/0.30#7/!1 lee/ urban Sto. /0.00 L' Line \r CYi LOUJM Ps` Ns SEED \AL.1 D!S T .E D AReAS POVR S ree loco FAKC i sT0 SOIL . APP j Irge - 0 /ALL �e.4ys Haze `�c >3 I 2-2b' / -V add • C.0 I „ AN 301984 I. 1 FPT, Cb LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 20 40 60 80 100 - - - - - -- ill-- - -- SCALE IN FEET 24 Fr ;1�'fiL'Sy NY HEDEb'. ��LX 4' fLTS, 3• APc ;•rr. -nN6 r/HECr S O C >3 *. 1 e$, 6r 2' S E1 FOSTER BRIDGE NO. 3158 DUWAMISH RIVER MILE 9.2 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ORM Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved to determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Com- plete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all states and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (n /a) and continue on to the next questions. A. BACKGROUND • Paul Hooper 1. Name of Proponent King County Road Engineer 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 900 King County Administration Building Seattle Wa.. 98104 3. Date Checklist Submitted 1 -4 -84 4. Agency Requiring Checklist King County 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Foster Bridge No. 3158 Replacement 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: Post - tensioned concrete box girder bridge with 149' and 80' spans and a 34' roadway width including 2 -12' traffic lanes, a 5' sidewalk on the west side, a 4' shoulder on the east side and a 1' curb. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): The bridge connects the intersection of Interurban Avenue South and 52 Avenue South on the south side of the Duwamish River with 56th Avenue South on the north side of the river. BALD F -199 7 pages -1- [h LLL L.ddL[J [JAN 30 1984 CITY vF 61(.:.111. \ PLANNING DEPT. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1985 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state and local- - including rezones).: Coast Guard Permit, Corps of Engineers Permit, Hydraulic Project Approval, King County and Tukwila Shorelines Permits, HUD and FHWA funding 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been com- pleted regarding the proposal; if none has been com- pleted, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See #9 above. Hydraulic Project Application attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) . 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures: b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X X X X Explanation: Excavation will be required for construction of foundations. Fill will be required for the approach roadways to the bridge, and for riprap protection of the south bank. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Yes Maybe No X X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e.. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawls, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct in- jection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: X' x X X X • • 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of specifies, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes Maybe No X x x x Explanation: Landscaping will include planting of grasses, shrubs and small trees. Clearing will include removal of several cottonwood trees. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: x x 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: x 7. Light and Glare. Will the pro- posal produce new light or glare? Explanation: X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Yes Maybe No X 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: X 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of Additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X C. Impact upon existing trans- portation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and /or goods? -5- X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Yes Maybe No X X Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X X Explanation: The bridge, approach roadways,, overlook and walkway will be public facilities and will require normal maintenance. Public services will be enhanced for the area by restoring normal traffic patterns. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- X went of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? • • Explanation: Provision is made to accommodate future 12" water, 6" sewage force main, 4" telephone conduit and 3" cable TV conduit. City Light and telephone lines in immediate area will require relocation to suit new facilities. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Yes Maybe No X Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality of quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: Overlook on south bank and walkway to north bank of river enhance recreational opportunities. X 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? X Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponen : PAUL C. HOOPER, P. County Road Engineer Date : JAN 06 1984 DEPARTMENT OF GAME 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, Washington 98504 • • HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPLICATION (R.C.W. 75.20.100) PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE O NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREA DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES General Admin. Bldg. Olympia, Washington 98504 10 LAST NAME FIRST DEPT. OF PUBLIC 19 CONTACT PHONE(S) 23a [] KING COUNTY WORKS 344 -4096 ROUTE County Administration Bldg. 20 STREET OR RURAL ? 1 9 WRIA A a: c D 900 King CITY Seattle STATE COUNTY ZIP WA 98104 15 U3 _ F G TRIBUTARY Tr River 12 STREAM OR LAKE Duwamish 13 QUARTER SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE (E -W) 14 23N 4E 11 TYPE OF PROJECT Bridge Replacement NW . . ', = =DESC - IP '#O • . •WORK : e D AND EQUIPMENT ...,. Construction of a post- tensioned concrete box girderbridge replacement structure. Work .. within the, limits, of, ordinary, high, water wiO 11, ncl,I{ne ,i,nst411,4tign ,Qf .fal$eviork.Rili►?9i • • • and• pi acement. Pf. riprap. prDter.tipn a•l.ong. the• .s.auth .r.i•uer• .bank (IF NECESSARY USE BACK OF THIS SHEET OR ADDITIONAL SHEETS) ` - :DISTANCE"°DIRECTI N TO .PROJECT. SITE FROM NEAREST TOWN Project begins at intersection of nterurban Ave. S. and 52nd Ave. S. Tukwila, WA, and passes northerly over the Duwamish River to 56th Ave. S. PROPOSED STARTING DATE June 1984 PROPOSED FINISHING DATE June 1985 PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS (IF ANY) Kin. Count -Cit of Tukwil. X71 SEPA I r , YES ONO 22 • UNDER $5.000 23 OTHER PERMITS Coast G rd, Corps of Engineers, Shorelines Management j j(OvER $5,000 B IS AR UNDERSTOOD RE STARTED UNTIL IS RECEIVED A SIGNED APPROVAL J2� A SIGNED NO WORK P R VAL // SI (�y��� ;;T #ME LIMIT a ,, , .:Na • +♦ MN `+ -A..4. ,.i'c Mt -`"Je !%I •✓ •W.. i'r e .. u, r°iysxC' .,.•f '*'3X < at ..31lA'•�]T Yf�.txy' •`:.r” rier`t ,' .... t•st .N♦ M `'�. J' `.t!.. 'ar•.i ... a{r ♦'• N L 1 hj..,M+ •y �.sk .0 `nIA V M � . .4---:-....... 1- o - ..A-1,.;,:::,..! �i �' ♦ V l '.: • t• • L• . 7 • • . • . • • .• .. TI NS `s . •Ch 7Y „q g.' ... .- . •:. SO• �!-♦aR T `i •i0,4 for • °v' a iii[[[ r _.L•1.yC, °2 V tP p "`•. ,,i.4 t..iL <�'t;'y`�astr�.,. r �`, s.a 'yi r .•:'d'('SUk Cdi.?.' .a G•^t• f..- r d %i • �._c„Y'.?�s 111, s •' .t"'4r'n,}'- •• IY "♦1 : .. ?'.�.:.w.F'•1;41,♦'Ui.j♦l if tP .P+�+'2 ai-r i4 `', • S ti g � Yyj ^t i°J 4 f ♦' 1l y Y.l♦ 4^t.. .F +� r't,'! L • l t c p• ua I^' w2-...-- t'F+' i 1.7,15, -z°' �: jT1( '- M'4Y't4. } �z• ti.,w �wi�.:►, s.s -+.. A� .;/ j Y. `-.✓v,:.._+-GS9.b 6� „,;.0-0 �S+Y t� ..t 's §..., f,G 'a.u` �y �s^f�i � ") 4.4=n5":14''''..'''..07. L��. ate ✓ R_';V::::' a4 a,Syd -` A "ii i. t. •TS.1'T rr7�4' e„..9 • �` E'iM l...e .tJ°% .' 5" • t 1! . ., .e+ ..til "'i, .. deva f S L�!i !ai ., ...+ Off d ! ♦,fij T'1 S 1 a .,rw U^a.,.�4'f+: `�P� 4 �.M• i` 93 41C. s` i t . t fay • v„imy� { pf f �a 'Q. .�»�j7l: 'kiyd __°7'R. kii( ,Yri.• :4 - �'ti°�+r`! . - . a.t � t l s i; • _ - ,•,,.mss.,,, ...N.117':'0,-Z-- e ..{. 4i�F� i.,t•„Vri!;� .?_," -.c '� "fir,. . 4., .'t s.1 . •°°` .,,. t * °(•1 ' % y,�" i`• +lp . 4 - T 3 1`14k4' 2 . .. i .:s•4: k 'e--- 14Y .l.W�ti ♦ ♦ J A♦ . •. -_f s. ,. rJwA1 : r • _ • • ... -.. '. ► . • ♦ • ,.' • .., • 4 •• a •..•••• .:♦.•- ; 4 .., i .l -,' N C �' 2 . 4 • a x et'r� - t t ..-4,kt .c fit' i 1,1 .A,. .,-,:♦ d OA ♦�„....;.,..-ii:-....,..-:. 1 �. r ^`u°', .. ! . S • 0'1,4* . ♦ . .Y 'f.. S• S M • • •• a`> -•. R • �„ . - • 5.. ♦ • V .. ♦ • • • • .... .. , . . } `741 4' tat• _ L_ 5 .M • A lilt 4:t*Ser '' '• • . •..� °$' t. t %��`p` <� +'Y+r., 'Y R �, {. Y S , , yy�1.Sfi � f, L•waa� .« "�L•X rwL.J`•sy w1' ...,;.r.1.44411,4-10:. a :. i£F • a. ♦ n .. e --..-:-:•..,-', A ',`$vll $�t1' �,ss`i`�r?��.... i.+@. .,;- a. ..•yp^i •�}°"' T ` TI.!t :-. Y ♦ ,� .S• .e•. f !. ♦ * y-t•"M• F "It, r74'•t♦,,.• .4, •�.�V. -,, 2 r""4 . j .n °t+ r " : - .- t Y • A., • j•..#:,. • • • ♦ -.. A.•• ♦.,4/vat,ai.l...••. s ♦. •.•••pLAf\IN,PJG•OEf•F 6 CITY � y � y � � . , 4J aF TUKbvILA - Y l 1984 -". r--.-. l_..l -• NW Sec.. 14 .._._. Tow p 23 – North, Range_ 4 . (1or ) SKETCH MAP POST TENSIONED CONCRETE CC BOX GIRDER BRIDGE. NO FOUNDATIONS WITHIN >_ LIMITS OF ORDINARY it HIGH WATER (EL. 6) KING COUNTY LIGHT LOOSE RIPRAP 'EL. —18 TO —2 CITY OF TUKWILA SCALE: 1" = 200' 4 WATER EL. —1 MAY 11, 1983 DATUM NGVD Rev. 1947 N Debr:.s & G bar removal 1: 200 yds. - vel -y, 1 :•' I . - n -1' ha, •e • ' }. ck River \lvert \ re- State? N Highway .1',. Scale -2" t •y I P.. lacement ' /op , ?�_, S AMPLE MAP E N The sample map to the left indicates the type of information which should be provided. Any scale may be used and the space does not necessarily have to represent a Section. Please indicate clearly all pertinent data on the space provided above for a sketch map —type of project, area of stream in- volved, landmarks, distance and direction to nearest town, etc. 0 *YDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL. R.C.W. 75.20.100 January 25, 1984 (Applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence) • " PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES General Admin. Bldg. Olympia, Washington 98504 - 10 LAST NAME FIRST t9 CONTACT PHONES) King County Department of Public Works 344 -4096 1 2 1 2 3 4 IMO-23053-01 20 STREET OR RURAL ROUTE , • 900 King County Administration Building WRI" 7 e A B C DB `U9' 0001 CITY STATE ZIP Seattle Washington 98104 14 15 18 m F G c f 12 STREAM OR LAKE TRIBUTARY —TO Duwamish River 11 TYPE OF PROJECT Bridge. Replacement 13 QUARTER SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE (E-W) NW 14 23N 4E comet King TIME LIMITATIONS: THIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN 5 June 1, 1984 AND BE COMPLETED BY: 8 September 30, 1985 THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES AND ITS PROVISIONS FOLLOWED BY THE PERMITTEE AND OPERATOR PERFORMING THE WORK. The person(s) to whom this approval is issued may be held liable for any loss of or damage to fish life or habitat which results from failure to comply with the provisions or intent of this approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this approval is a gross misde- meanor punishable by fine and /or imprisonment. The Departments of Fisheries and Game reserve the right to make additional restrictions or conditions or revoke the approval if deemed necessary by the departments for the protection of fish life. These departments cannot be held liable for any property damage which might occur as a result of this project. This approval pertains only to the provisions of the Fisheries and Game Codes. Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. Note: It is noted that this is a single span structure with the abutments located above high water areas. 1. The use of fresh concrete shall be completely isolated from contact with the river. 2. Pile driving (and removal) for false work shall be limited to less than 16 hours per days 3. No construction debris shall be discharged in the river. All debris which falls into the river shall be removed immediately. 4. Bridge drains shall not discharge directly into the river. 5. Material excavated while shaping the bankline for placement of riprap shall be disposed of above high water areas. SEPA: DNS, King County, January, 1984. Location: Interurban Avenue and 52nd Avenue Regional Habitat Manager - Rick Trosper - telephone - 753 -2907 WRW:RAT:mr cc: Trosper Johns - Patrol �fr� L ���G �_ U '._IAN . � P 30 1984 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. - #4_ 'e,i fl-t..• 4frECTOR DIRECTOR GAM 111(Rev.9/77) •348• �� 9 MAILING LIST FOR PUBLIC NOTICE MEM JAN 3 0 1984 CITY OF TUKVViLA PLANNING 1G DEPT. TAX LOT NO. OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS • PROPERTY ADDRESS (IF NOT OWNER- OCCUPtED). 000300 -56 State of Washington Department of Highways Highways Administration Bldg. Olympia, WA 98504 000300 -65 Craig R. Dunning Same. . 5330 South 136th Street • . Seattle, WA .98168 000300 -66 E. J. Duncan & G. H. McKenna 5320 South 136th' Street. 3719 South 140th .Street ,Seattle, WA 98168 000300 -72 Peter M. Thomson 13444 51st Avenue South 9409 NE 14th Street Bellevue, WA 98004 000300 -88 Tukwila Interurban Investment John Strander . P.O. Box 700 Mercer Island, WA 98040 . .000300 -97 Charles Puzzo .13521 52nd Avenue South _ -Puzzo Land Development Co. P.O. Box 556 . Woodinville, WA 98072 I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS OF PARCELS WITHIN 34)0 • FEET OF SITE PERIMETER TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. JAM' APPLEGATE, Env, King County Departme' . .g•i nee r Publ ib : orks MAILING LIST FOR PUBLIC NOTICE Mh-n IJAN 3 0 1984 CITY OF Tth <WI'LA PLANNING DEPT. TAX LOT NO. OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS 1 .PROPERTY ADDRESS (1F NOT OWTOMR-OCCUP1ED) 000300 -4 Tukwila Interurban Invest John Strander P.O. Box•700 Mercer Island, WA 98040 000300 -26 Charles Puzzo 13446 Interurban Avenue South Puzzo Land Development Co. P.O. Box 556 .Woodinville, WA 98072 - 000300 -27 Kenneth A. Bergsma 13450 Interurban. Avenue South 4003 South 152nd Street Seattle, WA 98188 000300 -28 Grant C. Maurer, Inca 13431 Interurban Avenue South 4302 SW Cloverdale Seattle, WA 98136 • • 000300 -32 Seattle City Light 1015 Third Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104 • 000300 -38 John . Cameron Strander 13530 52nd Avenue South P.O. Box 88636 . Tukwila, WA 98188 . . 000300 -39 King County 500 King County Administration Bids. . Seattle, WA 98104 000300 -43 State of. Washington Department. of Highways Highways Administration Bldg. Olympia, WA 9.8504 000300 -49 City of Tukwila 13500 .Interurban Avenue South 14475 59th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98067 • • 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS OF PARCELS WITHIN 300 FEET OF SITE PER I METER TO THE BEST OF MY 4 • LEDGE. .JA APPLEGATE, • Kinn .nunty n�aiar�- ment. naineer Puhlir Wnrkc 4 o N .4�� D `G'4 N- 4 ®. a,V At • �. r le o I' • oosot 1 � ` • \ Nia-gr 4� sy r • l% _p 4 rt • r King County Executive Randy Revelle Department of Public Work Donald J. LaBelle, Director January 26, 1984 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 • FiT AN 3 0 1984 �1iY GF TUKW LA PLANNING DEPT• The attached Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance on Replacement of the Foster Bridge was issued by King County on January 10, 1983. Fifteen days have elapsed since that date. No comments indicating the proposal would have a significant adverse impact on the environment have been received. Therefore, the County now adopts the attached Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance as its Final Declaration of Nonsignificance on this project. DONALD J. LaBELLE Director Date DJL /JA:mw cc: Washington State Department of Fisheries Washington State Department of Game U. S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development King County Housing and Community Development John E. Mikesell, Bridge Section, U. S. Coast Guard John Klasell, District Federal Aid Engineer, Federal Highway Administration Washington State Department of Transportation Brad Collins, Tukwila Planning Department Bryan Glynn, Manager, Building and Land Development Division ATTN: Andy Ruostala 900 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-2517 • PROPOSED DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Replacement of Collapsed Foster Bridge Proponent: King County Department of Public Works Location of Proposal: NW 1/4 Sec. 14, Township 23 N., Range 4 E. Lead Agency: King County This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official: Donald J. LaBelle Position /Title: Director King County Department of Public Works Date Signature Z0~47 CITY OF TUKwiLA PLANNING DEPT.