Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-217-84 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PARKS AND RECREATION - PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLANCITY OF TUKWILA LUNG RANGE PARK AND OPEN SPACE EPIC - 217 -84 NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW, notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila did on April 2, 1984 take the action described below. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, other otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced within 30 days or be barred. The action taken by the City of Tukwila notice of which is hereby given, was: Adoption of. Long Range Park and Open Space Plan for the City of Tukwila. Pertinent documents may be examined during regular business hours at City Hall, Parks and Recreation Department, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., City of Tukwila. Filed by Brad Collins, Responsible Official Published: Record Chronicle Date: April 15, 1984 April 22, 1984 WAC 197-11-1350 DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Adoption of Long Range Park and Open Space Plan Proponent City of Tukwila Location of proposal City of Tukwila Lead agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC 217 -84 This proposal has been determined not to have a probably significant adverse- impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS). is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). Thisdecision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. -This information is available to the public on request. Responsible official Brad Collins Position /title Responsible Official Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. 433 -1846 Date April 2, 1984 Signature. 19 OB City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor M EMORANDUNI •TO: JOHN WALLACE, CITY ATTORNEY FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director e>e--- DATE: March ]9, 1984 SUBJECT: SEPA Review of Comprehensive Functional Plans Go-s -A2 kr1/21( . �-t no L0a7 n,v* , a- / * 37/%15 Your opinion about SEPA review equirements for Comprehensive Functional Plans such as. the Transportation Improvement Plan., Comprehensive Water Plan, Comprehensive Sewer Plan, and Park & Open Space Plan would be help- ful. These .plans are required by the State of Washington for the City of. Tukwila to qualify for State funds and are not exempted from SEPA review. For years the City has been revising these plans without meeting the SEPA review requirements in some cases or questionably meeting them in other cases. Reliance on the fact that past actions have not caused •a problem does not appear to be an adequate approach, but efforts to point out the jeopardy placed on decisions that are based on these plans have not suc- ceeded in gaining support for a new approach. Perhaps my concerns are not warranted, but as the Responsible Official. under SEPA, I .would like your opinion. I am currently making a threshold . determination on the Parks & Open Space•Plan, which will be ready for adop tion by the Council shortly. I propose to make a Declaration of Non - Significance be referencing the Environmental Impact Statements for the City's Comprehensive Plan and the recent Capital Improvement Program, but I am not totally comfortable with that proposal. Your review and advice within the next week or two at the most would be appreciated. BC /blk #6-5 -„1„ • it kiaei - ' 4- DNS Ititp, 41,— 3,1044 . CtTY GF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER ---,,7I7 y CONTROL NUMBER /LJ-0/ CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUT, FORM TO: D BLDG. [ PLNG., P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE a P. & R., PROJECT .71,a41R /21id tpirl 4mce, A2ii, l fi C '" 'i -e', 1/ -e_tii f=',!i 7C rz.. ADDRESS Gjvy DATE TRANSMITTED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR ,''Ck 4-p v2wt)A1//,) ifee/ek-) RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ,2 //Q41V7/ RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Q CO 'rte dto a CCIa �TQ I a 0 0 0 a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a � � 1 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q PLAN APPROVED. PLAN CHECK DATE 3 - COMMENTS PREPARED BY ms's !a.1.4 _Q w. a, � Iowr -ct, "- _ _�•'—° ,n r•-•-,^^' P AL ' C_P_S_ FIRM. 7 F! 00f1-. CoO.00 olirl _ 07 571.VDD,�i�f �z ;n�� -T `� -8 �, /��� Vie..) CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible. Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Park & Recreation Dept., City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Don williams, Director 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 - 1.843 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Long Range Park and ()pen Space Plan 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal .(including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attachment "A" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): All park development will occur within the Tukwila corporate limits. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. 1989, Capital projects 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b) . King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES NO x • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES NO X, YES NO X YES NO X. YES NO X YES NO X YES NO x. YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,_ or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None ' 11. Do you .know of any plans by others.which may affect the property covered by . your proposal? If yes, explain: . Related to the city's general capital improvement program and Land Use Policy Plan. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None. II. ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. .Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X, (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? X (c.) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? X. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X -2- 0 YES MAYBE NO See ATTACHMENT "B" (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate,, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO X X X x x • • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the . ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail -. able for public water supplies? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, . or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • Explanation:. X . Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will .the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location., distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:. (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X X x. X SEE ATTACHMENT "B" SEE ATTACHMENT "B" x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X. X X. X • • '18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO SEE ATTACHMENT "B" I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above . information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title Date Donald Williams, Director Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department -8- x Attachments to the Environmental Checklist Form, Tukwila Long Range Park and Open Space Plan Attachment "A" (under item Description .of the Proposal ._ The Long Range Park and Open Space Plan has both policy elements and physical. elements. New policies adopted in Section 2 are in conformance with the goals and policies of the city's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. These newly- adopted policies are a formalization of existing unwritten policies and procedures operating in the Parks Department. None of these policies is expected to have a significantly adverse effect on the physical or social environment of either Tukwila or its recre- ational service area. The physical - planning element has two major subdivisions: Short-Range and Long. Range. The Short Range projects have, with the exception of several additional. trails, been listed in the Tukwila 1984 -89 Capital Improvements Program, which was covered by a draft environmental impact statement dated November 1, 1983, and a final E.I.S. dated January 6, 1984. A new Environmental Checklist Form will be . prepared prio r to the construction of each Short Range project, when the exact . program and physical effects of each project are better known_. Long Range projects are advisory, are described in general rather than specific terms, and are neither costed nor scheduled for implementation. , Long Range projects will have to be placed in a future Capital Improvement Program prior to implementation_ Like the Short Range projects, all Long. Range projects will be covered by Environs. mental Checklist .Forms at the C.I.P. planning stage, and again prior to actual con- struction. The Open Space element of the plan is advisory, and recommends a future study to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the open space goalsof:-the existing Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The open space element does not make recommendations for action on specific parcels of land. It does identify "study areas" which are areas. (a) previously identified for "Special Development Con- siderations" on the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map; or (b) previously identified in a prior adopted park plan as a potential park or open space site; or (c) generically identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan as having potential open space value (e.g., steep wooded slopes or wetlands). The only recom- mendation for these study areas is that they should be reviewed prior to 1990 to. "determine the feasibility and desirability of additional actions_" Attachment_ "B" .(under II, Environmental Impacts) This applies to Short Range. projects. At this stage, no Short Range projects are anticipated to have significantly adverse effects on earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, upset, population, housing, trans- portation, public services, energy, human health, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, or historical resources. Note that each proposed project will have an Environmental Checklist .Form prepared prior to construction, after the projects are more defined, and when environmental impacts can be assessed more reliably_ C, 11,Y..-OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROU•G FORM TO: Q BLDG. 0 PLNG. ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED PERMIT NUMBER.friO1C -.2/ /'16.-/ CONTROL NUMBER fi-/--0, P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE Q. P. & R. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Ale, RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Q L stc 1-to 65k L471‘i � CIN) 714is Q (,)klc_H- wiLL 1 ■) •..1MPQCTC Q —ire v quo KAtA —. 1 �) 'p tvN(P tir (s CoUltrk Q ^P Lang CiLkitTS "R.#c r 0-6-1) tv\ FetLf t--$ T(?#1LS W 1 LS__ t1.0m c Q w a t Fnu u` 14- dlZt_oc 3b il_S LAN 6 L Q i tm� VT'Le Q Q a 0 Q 0 Q Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE / `? COMMENTS PREPARED BY CITY O. TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER .2/7 -9q CONTROL NUMBER ?t-% -031 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROW* FORM TO: [J BLDG. Q PLNG. [„ P.W. ErFIRE El POLICE a P. & R. PROJECT 1QLi'%1 and Op ii a c& 1/(211- li cr ' n f VeVi_ 1. ADDRESS t )A ,,C -t) mityi_,l .`EPA": " ge-%-) DATE TRANSMITTED .W /4 RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY abOazi C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR &C,k RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN_ THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: C—oin M e, a - a a a Q a El a .. a a a a a a D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE 2 ^� COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P_S_ FORM ? (101. : (PILL Vain ,07,67 1, XigZ)8(4O — -E2i -zl7-43 4 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FEB 11984 CITY OF * F L r.i.:' €LA This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the aPa ti::'t`' . 'CPT permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental` Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Park & Recreation Dept., City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Don Williams, Director 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1843 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attachment "A" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical etting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): All park development will occur within the Tukwila corporate limits. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. 1989, Capital projects 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required' for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b). King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES NO x '(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit • (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES' NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:. None - 11. Do you know of any plans by others.which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Related to the city's general capital improvement program. and Land Use Policy Plan: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. .Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? YES MAYBE NO See ATTACHMENT "B" (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic -or physical features? -2 X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration, of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE. NO x X X X x X • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the . ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. . Will the proposal result in: . (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers, of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthi c organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation:. X X X • YES MAYBE NO '6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use . of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of . use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:. (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon., or result in a need for new or altered' governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X X SEE ATTACHMENT "B" SEE ATTACHMENT "B" x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO. x X X. x. YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? x Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? SEE ATTACHMENT ."B" Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? X Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title Date, Donald Williams, Director Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department -8- • S Attachments to the Environmental Checklist Form, Tukwila Long Range Park and Open Space Plan O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Attachment "A" (under item. Description of the Proposal.. The Long Range Park and Open Space Plan has both policy elements and physical elements. New policies adopted in Section 2 are in conformance with the goals and policies of the city's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. These newly - adopted policies are a formalization of existing unwritten policies and procedures operating in the Parks Department. None of these policies is expected to have a significantly adverse effect on the physical or social environment of either Tukwila or its recre- ational service area. The physical - planning element has two major - subdivisions: Short-Range and Long Range. The Short Range projects have, with the exception of several additional trails, been listed in the Tukwila 1984 -89 Capital Improvements Program, which was covered by a draft environmental impact statement dated November 1, 1983, and a final E.I.S. dated January 6, 1984. A new Environmental Checklist Form will be prepared prio r to the construction of each Short Range project, when the exact program and physical effects of each project are better known.. Long Range projects are advisory, are described in general rather than specific terms, and are neither costed nor scheduled for implementation. , Long Range projects will have to be placed in a future Capital Improvement Program prior to implementation. Like the Short Range projects, all Long Range projects will be covered by Environ- mental Checklist .Forms at the C.I.P. planning stage, and again prior to actual con- struction. The Open Space element of the plan is advisory, and recommends a future study to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the open space goalsofthe existing Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The open space element does not make recommendations for action on specific parcels of land. It does identify "study areas" which are areas. (a) previously identified for "Special. Development Con- siderations" on the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map; or (b) previously identified in a prior adopted park plan as a potential park or open space site; or (c) generically identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan as having potential open space value (e.g., steep wooded slopes or wetlands). The only recom- mendation for these study areas is that they should be reviewed prior to 1990 to "determine the feasibility and desirability of additional actions." Attachment "B" (under II, Environmental Impacts) This applies to Short Range. projects. At this stage, no Short Range projects are anticipated to have significantly adverse effects on earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, upset, population, housing, trans- portation, public services, energy, human health, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, or historical resources. Note that each proposed project will have an Environmental Checklist,Form prepared prior to construction, after the projects are more defined, and when environmental impacts can be assessed more reliably. CI-TY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER _/ ' -.2/7 6%- CONTROL NUMBER 544-03/ CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTTRG FORM TO: [ BLDG. D PLNG. R. P.//W��/.,, [i FIRE Q POLICE a'; P. & R. PROJECT ./ 61� and Open C� i°Iaii- • (FOY CLi'V i' f 1i���i f�Jjs9 L ADDRESS C (74- ,c,h.Qt.)l ` — ki DATE TRANSMITTED .2,0/5q C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR & `' RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4/7/2 ay RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE. SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: a a a . a a a a a a D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED a PLAN APPROVED pi PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY c ›VOG ilk 11(0°.u° _ 0?,57L , 05 8 DZ o-)I 2 /1/g CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the a permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. 'FEB' fa%Hrgi 1 1984 CITY TUKAViLA ;' ::'!tip •PPT. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Park & Recreation Dept.,. City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Don Williams, Director 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1843 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attachment "A" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): All park developme.nt will occur within the Tukwila corporate limits. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. 1989, Capital projects 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal .(federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b). King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO x • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None 11. Do you know of any plans by others.which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Related to the city's general capital improvement program and Land Use Policy Plan: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO See ATTACHMENT "B" (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x. (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? .(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration, of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3 -. X x x. x x X YES MAYBE. NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the . ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? x Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, . grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area., or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation:. X • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation:. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result. in: (a) .Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x X x • • YES MAYBE. NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or- growth rate of the human population of an area? . Explanation: 12. Housing? the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: x 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? x (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection ?. (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? SEE ATTACHMENT "B" SEE ATTACHMENT "B" x • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? 0 Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:- YES, MAYBE NO SEE ATTACHMENT.'!B "' I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title Date Donald Williams, Director Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department -8- X Attachments to the Environmental Checklist Form, Tukwila .'Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Attachment (under. _(under_ item,_ I -6) Description of the Proposal The Long Range Park and Open Space Plan has both policy elements and physical elements. New policies adopted in Section 2 are in conformance with the goals and policies of the city's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. These newly- adopted policies are a formalization of existing unwritten policies and procedures operating in the Parks Department. None of these policies is expected to have a significantly adverse effect on the physical or social environment of either Tukwila. or its recre- ational service area. The physical - planning element has two major- subdivisions: Short.Range and Long ._.. Range. The Short Range projects have, with the exception of several additional . trails, been listed in the Tukwila 1984 -89 Capital Improvements Program, which was covered by a draft . environmental impact statement dated November 1, 1983, and a final E.I.S. dated January 6, 1984. A new Environmental Checklist Form will be . prepared prior to the construction of each Short Range project, when the exact program and physical effects of each project are better known. Long Range projects are advisory, are described in general rather than specific terms, and are neither costed nor scheduled for implementation. , Long Range projects 'will have to be placed in a future Capital Improvement Program prior to implementation. Like, the Short Range projects, all Long. Range projects will be covered by Environ -. mental Checklist Forms at the C:I.P. planning stage, and again prior to actual con- struction. The Open Space element of the plan is advisory, and recommends a future_ study to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the open space goalsof. the existing Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The open space element does not make recommendations for action on specific parcels of land. It does identify "study areas" which are areas. (a) previously identified for "Special Development Con- siderations" on the Comprehensive "Land Use Policy Plan map; or (b) previously identified in a prior adopted park plan as a potential park or open space site; or (c) generically identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan as having potential open space value (e.g., steep wooded slopes or wetlands). The only recom- mendation for these study areas is that they should be reviewed prior to 1990 to "determine the feasibility and desirability of additional actions." Attachment "B" .(under II, Environmental Impacts) This applies to Short Range projects. At this stage, no Short Range projects are anticipated to have significantly adverse effects on earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, upset, population, housing, trans- portation, public . services, energy, human health, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, or historical resources. Note that each proposed project will have an Environmental . Checklist Form prepared prior to construction, after the projects are more defined, and when environmental impacts can be assessed more reliably. . ITY'OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUT it FORM TO: [i BLDG. Q PLNG. [W. P.W. Q FIRE PROJECT R.LV and Open c T7 P7, ADDRESS Ci Lt o - tl vl tL DATE TRANSMITTED .21j /56/ C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Plek 9I7 4 CONTROL NUMBER .p-/-03 Q POLICE P. & R. Ati_t)Przi-L-) A&T.t,5 Seeplek-) RESPONSE REQUESTED' BY z / /QIg'/ RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 0 Q Q- Q a Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED Q PbAN '' GK DATE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q COMMENTS PREPARED BY .45);,;_,., PLAN APPROVED . 0 C.P.S_ FORM 2 .11 (Paw Vovri CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the a permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statementneeds to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. frinEWIL:1 IFFB 11984 CITY OF •tliKs; LA • "411: r EPT. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Park 8, Recreation Dept., City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Don Williams,. Director 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433-1843 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept. .5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal .(including but not limited --to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attachment "A" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting. of the. proposal, as 'well as the extent of the-land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate:under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): A I I -park development will- occur within the Tukwila corporate limits. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. 1989, Capital projects 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal .(federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO x • • '(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit • (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES NO x YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes*, explain: None 11. Do you know of any plans by others.which may affect the property covered by . your proposal? If yes, explain: . Related to the city's general capital improvement program and Land. Use Policy Plan. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form._ None. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. .Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES' MAYBE NO See ATTACHMENT "B" (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- . • ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2 X x X • YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, . either on or off the site? x (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction - --of water movements, - -in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration . of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X X X X X X X X • • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the . ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. . Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, . or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crops? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation:. YES MAYBE NO • x X x X X -YES MAYBE NO Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: 8. Land Use Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: • 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, . distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result.in:: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, . or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE. NO x x X. . SEE ATTACHMENT "B" SEE ATTACHMENT "B" x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental" health)? Explanation: 'YES MAYBE NO X • • '18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? - Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO X SEE ATTACHMENT. "B" I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete.. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. i7) Signature and Title Date Donald Williams, Director Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department -8- Attachments to the Environmental Checklist Form, Tukwila Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 Attachment "A" (under item._ 1 -6) Description the Proposal .. The Long Range Park and Open Space Plan has both policy elements and physical elements. New policies adopted in Section 2 are in conformance with the goals and policies of the city's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. These newly- adopted policies are a formalization of existing unwritten policies and. procedures operating in the Parks Department. None of these policies is expected: to have a significantly adverse effect on the physical or social environment of either Tukwila or its recre- ational service area. The physical - planning element has two major -subdivisions: Short . Range• and Long Range. The Short Range projects have, with the exception of several: additional. trails, been listed in the Tukwila 1984 -89 Capital Improvements Program,, which was covered by a draft environmental impact statement dated Novermber 11, 1983, and a final E.I.S. dated January 6, 1984. A new Environmental Checklist Farm will be prepared prio r to the construction of each Short Range project, when the exact program and physical effects of each project are better knower_. Long Range projects are advisory, are described in general rather than specific terms, and are neither costed nor scheduled for implementation.. Long Ranee projects will have to be placed in a future Capital Improvement Program prior to implementation_ Like the Short Range projects, all Long. Range projects will be covered by Environ__ mental Checklist .Forms at the C.I.P. planning stage, and again prior to actual. con- struction. The Open Space element of the plan is advisory, and recommends a future study to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the open space goalsof: the existing Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The open space element does not make recommendations for action on specific parcels of land. It: does identify, "study areas" which are areas. (a) previously identified for "Special Development Con- siderations" on the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map; or (b) previously identified in a prior adopted park plan as a potential park or open space site; or (c) generically identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan as having potential .open space value (e.g., steep wooded slopes or wetlands). The only recom- mendation for these study areas is that they should be reviewed prior to 1990 to "determine the feasibility and desirability of additional actions_" Attachment "B" .(under II, Environmental Impacts) This applies to Short Range. projects. At this stage, no Short. Range projects are anticipated to have significantly adverse effects on earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, upset, population, housing, trans- portation, public services, energy, human health, utilities, aestihetics, recreation, or historical resources. Note that each proposed project will have an Environmental Checklist.Form prepared prior to construction, after the projects are more defined, and when environmental impacts can be assessed more reliably_ CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER ;/ C.--,07 u CONTROL NUMBER ?/-1-031 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: a BLDG. [j PLNG. 4:PA. °FIRE [j POLICE . & R. PROJECT 7Qu'%i % d alom 4000 A24, l i C.w -v 2-2)11-7(77,7_ ADDRESS nvy C1 ' - ram)) 1 , m(L z � .. e.i".. gee -/Y, DATE TRANSMITTED o1J /l3Ll v RESPONSE REQUESTED BY al/ /0lgy C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR &C,,4 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [l PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [I PLAN APPROVED [J PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 OFFICE MEMO CITY OF TU KWI LA TO: FINANCE DEPT. FROM: Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director DATE: February 1, 1984 SUBJECT: Environmental Checklist Fee Please charge acct. # 07.574.200.49.02 for th.e $60.00 fee for the Environmental Checklist (Park and Open Space Plan). pfd..g &0,0o 07,57L.2ov, -Qo2 fiO' Z17-sq /i/g� CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the a permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Park & Recreation Dept., City of Tukwila 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Don Williams, Director 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1843 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Long Range Park and Open Space Plan 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attachment "A" 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): All park development will occur within the Tukwila corporate limits. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. 1989, Capital projects 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or-Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b). King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO X (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Related to the city's general capital improvement program and Land Use Policy Plan. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Air (Explanations of all "yes and "maybe" answers are required YES MAYBE NO See ATTACHMENT "B" 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2 -• X X X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3-. X X X X X x x x • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the . ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? x Explanation: 4. Flora. . Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation:. • YES MAYBE NO '6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: 11. Population. Explanation: • •. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X x X SEE ATTACHMENT "B" SEE ATTACHMENT "B" x • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x (b) Communications systems? x (c) Water? x (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Storm water drainage? x (f) Solid waste and disposal? x Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: • • '18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO SEE ATTACHMENT.''B" I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title Date Donald Williams, Director Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department -8- x Attachments to the Environmental Checklist Form, Tukwila Long Range Park and Open Space Plan O O O O O O O O O Attachment_ 7A7 (under item ! -6) siptior of the Proposal The Long Range Park and Open Space Plan has both policy elements and physical elements. New policies adopted in Section 2 are in conformance with the goals and policies of the city's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. These newly- adopted policies are a formalization of existing unwritten policies and procedures operating in the Parks Department. None of these policies is expected to have a significantly adverse effect on the physical or social environment of either Tukwila or its recre- ational service area. The physical - planning element has two maj:or.rsubdivisions: Short-:Range and Long Range. The Short Range projects have, with the exception of several additional . trails, been listed in the Tukwila 1984 -89 Capital Improvements Program, which was covered by a draft, environmental impact statement dated November 1, 1983, and a final E.I.S. dated January 6, 1984. A new Environmental Checklist Form will be prepared prior to the construction of each Short Range project, when the exact program and physical effects of each project are better known. Long Range projects are advisory, are described in general rather than specific terms, and are neither costed nor scheduled for implementation. Long Range projects will have to be placed in a future Capital Improvement Program prior to implementation. Like the Short Range projects, all Long. Range projects will be covered by Environ -. mental Checklist Forms at the C.I.P. planning stage, and again prior to actual con- struction. The Open Space element of the plan is advisory, and recommends a future study to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the open space goals.o'f: the existing Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The open space element does not make recommendations for action on specific parcels of land. It does identify "study areas" which are areas (a) previously identified for "Special Development Con- siderations" on the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map; or (b) previously identified in a prior adopted park plan as a potential park or open space site; or (c) generically identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan as having potential: ;open space value (e.g., steep wooded slopes or wetlands). The only recom- mendation for these study areas is that they should be reviewed prior to 1990 to "determine the feasibility and desirability of additional actions." Attachment "B!' (under II, Environmental Impacts) This applies to Short Range projects. At this stage, no Short Range projects are anticipated to have significantly adverse effects on earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, Tight and glare, land use, natural resources, upset, population, housing, trans- portation, public services, energy, human health, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, or historical resources. Note that each proposed project will have an Environmental Checklist Form prepared prior to construction, after the projects are more defined, and when environmental impacts can be assessed more reliably.