HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-225-84 - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - 2 OFFICE BUILDINGSWESTERN PACIFIC
PROPERTIES
13989 - 57'" AVE S
EPIC - 225 -84
WAC 197 -11 -1350
DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Construction of two office buildings
Proponent Western Pacific Properties
Location of proposal Approximately 13989 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila
File N
EPIC- 225 -84
This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to
the public on request.
There is no comment period for, this DNS.
Responsible official Brad Collins
Position /title Planning Director
Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845
Date Lt— Zy — g`t Signature
This declaration is conditioned upon no cuts or excavation into the
existing bank along the westerly portion of the subject property.
*ILA `41 City of Tukwila
o6200 Southcenter Boulevard
us
�e o, Tukwila Washington 98188
•/ Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
May 3, 1984
Western Pacific Properties
13975 Interurban Ave. So.
Seattle, WA 98168
RE: EPIC - 225 -84
Dear Applicant:
Chapter 43.21C.RCW requires the attached notice be given in order to limit
any potential appeal of the City's decision to issue a Declaration of
Nonsignificance for your proposal. The City leaves the decision to give
this notice to you. If you elect to give notice, it is your responsibility
to follow the attached Section 43.21C.80.
Our recommendation is that you give this notice to minimize exposure to any
appeals on environmental basis. Potential delay to your project could
occur if 43.21C.80 RCW is not followed.
Respect lly
• Rick Beeler .
Associate Planner
RB /blk
CITY OF TUKW.ILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
{-BLDG
ICN
EPIC 22 — 04 •
FILE 19(22-5-b4
P.W. " -. FIRE POLICE 1'i-P & R
PROJECT FS-Yik] per(-1.P c -F\C 13L0(4. .
LOCATION ail- 1'3'1 e1 57/1°- f?Wf S , FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 1-(-3184-
STAFF COORDINATOR 1(X.._ j
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE' STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (e.1 4 co
RESPONSE RECEIVED
ITEM COMME
mumi
DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA •
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•CN
EPIC
FILE 02 -5 -bef
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG ( PLNG [W P.W. FIRE POLICE P & R
PROJECT FS' J 1 Ioe -l�l L fi(ZS P 'CZ 13U94
LOCATION ,a - 13 e/ 57l p,Vf. f S. FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ( 8.4 /k tJ
DATE TRANSMITTED
COORDINATOR i14(_ 13
RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DUI 14� I (lq Fro ce)N L (P hti'1 r
it c-t-s -S ) t1 VI () / 1\VALuf/ \
�.5�►i� S
TtnIAI N f 1V<s- J /'1.-L- T351 MAL/
DATE ' D / S - COMMENTS PREPARED BY
idO
C.P.S. Form 11
.k CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
•CN
EPIC -225-"1"-
FILE 02- -5
TO: 11 BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE
PROJECT S-v j p '-( L L.Op2'I•L =S — cf lC€ ISLIO4 .
LOCATION(- 13atg`t 57 pf(�. , S FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 4- ('3l8cj-
STAFF COORDINATOR FA (1:— TS.
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART -
4N1ENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
P, & R
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY I ac( tJ
RESPONSE RECEIVED
ITEM COMMENT
`
o' P41 r-s'
DATE r
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO:
BLDG PLNG
P.W.
FIRE
• CN
EPIC 22.5-
FILE ()(2._-5 —E!) 4
POLICE
PROJECT Yai I7es(- ! C _ t3U9( .
LOCATION 0/- 04/el lj-%T /YNe s , FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY q ( act f )c t3
RESPONSE RECEIVED
DATE TRANSMITTED 4(
STAFF COORDINATOR F4C31.- 15.
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE' STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
P &R
ITEM COMMENT
A. Jr x1•440.1.4 :.r
4.2:7.
e 44.1.14V
oft-
tare... .+,.. 40..41...00 a wiato•..
G d r
J o
9, Ale 42 reoe. ig
.L 1
4
G #o w .04_.artee_11
o tot r C_ I ✓* 4 ., Z-047
r
1.4--7' 71-10""A. . G A .,.►�..er se..
DATE ij/- /? — r'V
d-1
,.i oft ...a,...`
COMMENTS PREPARED BY ovea,`
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•CN
EPIC "22_5-g4-
FILE D2 -5 —,E)4
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE (I POLICE
PROJECT S- j — \ TSL174 .
LOCATION cezcsLyr r".31/ $ 5771 j f.. , 5 . FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED
STAFF COORDINATOR COORDINATOR .p ,
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
P &R
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY NcOo
RESPONSE RECEIVED
ITEM
DATE
COMMENT
5 /DiUgS /772e'
1I 1-! `GI x, 7 'z3 713 g// dV7`
-z-46s)444-ex,"74/
l V r/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY • /
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
BY
TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
rtrrn.
t
APR 131984
TO:.
BLDG
PLNG
P.W.
FIRE
CN
EPIC -225- - '
FILE p(z 5 —e4
POLICE
P &R
PROJECT per- 2►i — 1 IsLoCl• •
LOCATION tQJ 13'(e/ p,N� , t>, FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 4- NC4 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ( ac( h c iJ
STAFF COORDINATOR 4(._ RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION.. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM
COMMENT
Fir e-`D�feG'�' / °h 5rS- eh pe- Qrd ;k 9h c /U6 /
/5 re9`;r'1. \SP'.11Ale 5,ste 11147 b�-
C.
;41540//. J in / ev of — e ec..71-,s07
5751- �.)
r
1}cc ess Y-409 .15 (-i i -ewa S a/�� _ �- n
4 e qd e y�i-u 7L R- , — mwve' log,- 5,.4+1 74-
a- lo-, eid- /e9i'b/e Q � '��6I7 f 0 �
ree/ e„, c14 d q/2prov?J.
DATE 4 /6-
Crl-
- COMMENTS PREPARED BY f
C.P.S. Form 11
Control Number
CITY OF TUKI•WILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
. permit from the City of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be. completed.
A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
I. Name of Proponent: :Western Pacific Properties. Inc.
Jim Bodoia, Architect 454 -3344
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 13975 Interurban Ave. S.
Seattle, Washington 98168 241 -1616
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Interurban Flexi Five
'6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will oive
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Two two story office buildings totaling 9,520 square feet of which 2,500(1,250 •
per building) is on the second floor. Materials will be stucco and vinyl siding.
Trim will be painted wood.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located on a site' of approx. 29,355 s.f., the ground contact of the buildings
is approximately 6751 s.f. (23± %). The site is located in Interurban Avenue S.
across from Foster Golf Course. The site is flat and bare.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: September 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a). Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc.
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit
(c) Building. permit
YES NO X
YES X NO
YES X NO
(d) 'Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO -
(f) Sign permit YES x NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES X NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or father activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Future expansion will be the addition of phase IT ro the sire.
11. Do you know of any plans by others. which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed,, but is expected to be filed at some future .
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
IP
YES MAYBE. NO
x
x
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes-in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
x
Explanation:
Excavation and backfilling during construction (8AM to 5PM Monday through
Friday) . Site conouring to be minimal to.provide for natural drainage
away from building.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b)- The creation of'objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
x
x
Explanation:
For approximately three working days, asphalt paving will occur..
Otherwise, no odors will be emitted by tenants.
. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
br the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water' in any water.
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
° of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f). Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either •
through direct additions or.withdrawals, or through,
ky n°, +e nr ovrava'-inrc"
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? x
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? x
(i)
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
The addition of buildings will alter the existing absorption
rates. To offset this, a storm detention system has been designed.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,_or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? •
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
The proponent will -be adding landscaping where none exists.
x
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? x
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna? _X_—
x
x
x
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation: No wildlife has been!:-.Sited. Site is adjacent to a busy road.
However. a few small animals may be forced to .relocate.
6.
Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
YES MAYBE NO
x
Explanation:
Automobiles will be brought on to the site (maximum 31 for the two buildings)
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation: Although office hours will be 8AM to 5PM, a few cars will be coming
on to the site at night. The parking lot will use•non -glare lighting on 20' poles
Building glass should not pose a reflection problem per the site plan layout.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. . Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
x
x
x
Explanation: Electricity will be used for heating: An energy saving heat
system is planned. Concrete, gypsum drywall, glass and built up roof are
non - replenishable materials. However, this project is using little of each.
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
• •
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area ?'
Explanation:
x
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing? x
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:.
During the construction phase, workers will add to
vicinity traffic.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools? x
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? x
x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation:
Possible maintenance by City of Tukwila of road entrance to project
(57th Avenue S.)
15. Eneray. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
(b) Demand upon existing sources ofenergy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems? x
(c). Water? x
(d)• Sewer or septic tanks? x
(e) Storm water drainage? X _
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation: Other than utility hook -ups, the only alterations will
be the addition of a detention system.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health).?
Explanation:
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view ,open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
1:Ck
-4 .8aef
Signature and Title Architect Date
M t11-40H i--t s Fs.
x
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: r 'BLDG PLNG
P.W.
• CN
EPIC -22_5—
FILE Da-5-.F34
FIRE & R
PROJECT - Ty=fJj rnt--If=(L frl..44:= ,'CZL -S — C' F1 131-04
LOCATION nayr 13g/e/ 57l /YNe , S . FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (c � Q it 0
DATE TRANSMITTED lit
STAFF COORDINATOR iLt RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY •
C.P.S. Form 11
,•
Control Number
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
v r pry,
I APR 5 1984
C!i'.°r OF TUMN LA
PLANNING DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Western Pacific Properties. Inc.
Jim Bodoia, Architect 454 -3344
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 13975 Interurban Ave. S.
Seattle, Washington 98168 241 -1616
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Interurban Flexi Five
6. Nature and'Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will oive
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Two two story office buildings totaling 9,520 square feet of which 2,500(1,250 •
per building) is on the second floor. . Materials will be stucco and vinyl siding.
Trim will be painted wood.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located on a site of approx. 29,355 s.f., the ground contact of the buildings
is approximately 6751 s.f. (23±%). The site is located in Interurban Avenue S.
across from Foster Golf Course. The site is flat and bare.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: September 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc.
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit
(c) Building permit
YES NO x
YES x NO
YES x NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO ..
(f) Sign permit YES x NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES x NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES x NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington). YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES_L;:NO
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Future expansion will be the addition of phase TT to the site.
11. Do you know of any plans by others . which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future .
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features ?.
YES MAYBE. NO
x
x
x
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
X
Explanation:
Excavation .and backfilling during construction (8IM to 5PM Monday through
Friday) Site conouring to be minimal to provide for natural drainage
away from building.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b)- The creation of. objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
X
Explanation:
For approximately three working days, asphalt paving will occur.
Otherwise, no odors will be emitted by tenants.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? •
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or .withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation-?
x
x
x
x
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? x
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? x
(i)
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
The addition of buildings will alter the existing absorption
rates. To offset this, a storm detention system has been designed.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,.or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or .
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a. barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
The proponent will be adding landscaping where none exists.
x
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
x
x
x
x
Explanation: No wildlife has been. ^sited. Site is adjacent to a busy road.
However, a few small animalsiayfbe forced to relocate.
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise...
levels?
YES MAYBE NO
x
Explanation:
Automobiles will be brought on to the site (maximum 31 for the two buildings)
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation: Although office hours will be 8AM to 5PM, a few cars will be coming
on the site at night. The parking lot will use non -glare lighting on 20' poles
Building glass should not pose a reflection problem per the site plan layout.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:.
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
• resource?
x
x
Explanation: Electricity will be used for heating. An energy saving heat
system is planned. Concrete, gypsum drywall, glass. and built up roof are
non- replenishable materials. However, this.project is.using little of each.
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release �f hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:'.
11. Population.
Explanation:
• •
Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
During the construction phase, workers will add to
vicinity traffic.
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? _
Explanation:
Possible maintenance by City of Tukwila of road entrance to project
(57th Avenue S.)
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? .
Explanation: Other than utility hook -ups, the only alterations will
be the addition of a detention system.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health).?
Explanation:
x
x
x
x
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE. NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. .It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
\)4.11/1.e n80 LA
Signature and Title Architect
- M 111-10H 1 11s
Date
X
• •
HARRIS, MOODY, BLOOMQUIST proposed office building
"FLEXI-FIVE", TUKWILA
M L 1 L d rI
APR 5 19841
CITY OF
PLANNING DEPT.
IN 1*r0 50) accamC
04'
I
6I)2e PCCuazere. vAtic
3�f - re
� d
y
If.fr .)sz ,b.l-t xwm •
H/+NIOIcAS RAMP
NOLG ..
PROJECT DATA
Site Area
Building Type
Buliding Area
Construction Type
Percent lot coverage
Parking Required
Parking Provided
so. r ,, rr Percent Compact Stalls
e.g... LE
r nue.f4ke• Lows ..
eq M
fits - r
-d
WJM OFD
1Q2 GinL.a 1AM
17esrP+cTTrr eo
7/Wcwwwrt 71.dt.0
$1 6 ' dYtll.G✓ Rem.+
p.TG+O 1' cD'e P-TftiO
002D' 0..J GO1T
I/.I•LOW Put TRW Rrer'e• •
HaE B
*0 1%
Q
29355 sq.ft.
B -2
9520 sq.ft.
V -N
23%
30 CARS
32 CARS
40%
GAL, DESCRIPTION
That portion of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 end 1, la Block 3 and of Lot 10 le
• hock S. and of 17th 6.00. 1., all In Iillnae•.
according to the pl 4 la 9o1... 11 of 71.1.,
page 24, in Ring County, Yeshiaaaaa descrl6.d se follows.
Beginning at • point 0. the eons► lino of Lot 6, said Bloch 1, which
t• 1.9 °00'12R •lo01 said south lin. 71 ft. from the 111 corner
t►.r.of; th.01•' 819 °00.111 •long s.14 south llss 111.11 ft. to the
w as& tine of 17th Avenue B., formerly thence
1101 01.101 along said west lino 101.99 ft. to an 1 Floe with
the southwesterly .at.nitom of the north. ly lino of lb.
Touch ly 50 ft. of Lot I0, .old Block 0; theoc. 116 °11'11• along
said extension and aorch ly lino 11.66 It. toe. inor.•ction with
• 11n. which is parallel with and 100 feat south w.at.rly from the
.oab...c.. ly lino of Interurban 60000• Oltat• 11gh..7 5-0), add 11ea
also being the south l7 corner of that urt•la tract as de.crlh.d
its contract of sal. to Lawrence Ash and Dolor.. T. Ash, recorded
6.dltor'.'Til. 1.. x207010250; thence along the couch l7 line of
sail e.h Tract 111 11'0011 along laid parallel Ile. 100 ft; thee" 046 11'11'1, 227.09 ft. to • point which bear. 1110 °61'011, 76.21 ft.
to beginning, •ac.pt portion, if say, of said block 3, lying ly
of easterly lino tber.of.
DRAWING INDEX
'ITe F•L1 -N Of b1Tt o =ToOL6
r.Lrf -fL►i4 t yGa4 teCTIO-1
G riw-N:145 1 CSL.Lei ETA-- f1o74
Fir FLANS 120Cr DG-17.1L
M0bG GCTAILFo
r0-)-44=5-710.1, FL.84-1S
VLR PI:J MP,64-(I.tG
SANG, 0.-TMLS
r1 ..1ING
rza.,K 1 . r tT1,ILro -
TCJJ'- sp ('0.1 1=e1-041..tv
VICINITY MAP
I've I'•d
•
SITE PLAN
1' -
2
Jai N'I6eA37
(14)F 9'1t?'e"
1°�
'• 5%A'
b
0
wore.:
,
rims* pardniacw,
'1,1'4.4 4 ■••,••■••
puma. • 1.4.1 *VT
-Fo coc=x)
REM ilwo
Peo•
1.111WW11.. .044. •
SA4 cou:w
W11.400.0
a),
i
IXCP... C-4-4ff_DULE
Nuar.
•xte.
lyre.
reimpaw,
IMBIECE.1112011
toniZaBEICA
tG a
: .
5 .4,
.'. • ,
.,,i, G! it
A
4.9k'
MEI=
•tce
t'du.'d
A
•- : le.,
WORN=
Won
dd,,,,■,,,
b
1.15 . NIA; . 46,4E%
DEM
:.- -•
MN
1-e''
DV
ii
tomursunral
15
1 I SECOND.FLOOR PLAN
L. GOLAN- -0 EXTAIL-
. 4=d:
to'. a'
odd
• Wet
wz.-7 I
44
Aleil
0
vr,•••
411
! n
-.S
• • •
•
%;111
141
tlet 19
I M•
.44
vzy I IJi
A_414
I I
I I
I
ot 0"
10 ■Sio' 510'1 la 0..
0.4
11,15{64—
for LL ID Ma hc0-
C.04•41141c.. our
IDCITEMD x to"
0..10 -mug ■L■112. or PLOP "NO
114111 "1-COIL
Hard NOLL.
•14.40•••- DM/
••cop PICTI1.0
nor Lrrr me&
Hmos0- pea
!UR9 .. rce not
att o'
70.'d
rif
to* •
Ara arex
cc,
9 a.
. 91
91
b
FIRST FLOOR PLAN,
WIk11:014
maw-
wicrp-4
I-e4r
kenE.
IMBIECE.1112011
toniZaBEICA
tG a
4.0
5 .4,
.'. • ,
• 1,-4
EOM
KollIE
4.9k'
MEI=
•tce
•- : le.,
WORN=
Won
4.-Ivl
o-cf
DEM
:.- -•
MN
1-e''
DV
tomursunral
M. OM. owe ocallo• ormyr•a•
ton4
no
Id V*
Iterg !ICON alIALL fter120::).1 V/ 44441.
LITH *ANLL.
• -1.
4=JMIxrpligivasi
-
woe cr Hroucab
11.0C•44 117V-Orr VOL
l4061111
li— Tbrie-
I a wma,m:
— enorid.v.104
4•1241461110-
KVIIX
Id 14492 a% wit
eig.11,16G12- "TRIM
11V-Id
e.
OM rid m0
1ed•
IMINNLIIIIIP1111111111:1A1
N aorroz.
11-d
11
_CB ND Itecce,
E 7.W-8
A-2
- • • • • - - • •
Pe•
1 1 . .1 1 1 .1 . 1--1 . 1
..:1251;€.
SOUTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
—1 II (.4..0.a.
1144
or
,o' • cl
- - -
•
NI.e.e.a
,EAST ELEVATION
vi.teL W.
• 1=1_1 1 s-
.4
NORTH ELEVATION
- a
'BUILDING SECTION
'
raDeento
DAIL 7.2006
A-3.
LE6C-N12
.4070.70
0 •
0
.faw
M•V
-/271 I H ITf MAf-
No 4170+ 11
1141 7000170)70 •
141 4707)70 a Lai 4.0.7. 7 Ma. 2 7002 1 •• 10 70
1021. LO OF 0000 00 77. S. 0 17 44707 WOO
270111. 1160170 R 1 471 701 r Sun 11 a w7n. 277
R. 11 U4 0111. 1110 0170 0001110 4 17146.
1111414 0 11010 70 1 4702111.70 474..). 1021. Le
c12117 Sc441 AL704.1e 1101410 n. 1x74470
anoe: 1)107v00101..let Ln 7121410.11 T.
2. win lit 0. 017 201 3.. 170111 0511• 7w11100
110700'1 au= .1110170 701.• 1. 877211010170
770 M f0e1471.t7.nau70 v 1 7211•pnt1 010 0 11•
1112■14007 LO n. n Lm le. 0710 1. 110. • I. r.
ALMS LID 1021170 i o21un14 017 11.61 n R 411 1911011110 1'
9116 • 1410 11170 I7 10.916 ten 02 170 124 1/1011111/ 1701
1 10e010017 117 r 007761 17. 01770 navel 77011.
Ln 1111 410 •70* 011 17010111/17 Q•.. a 141 0477 422
anal= 11 =null 01 lU n inner 770 617 06013 1. n1.
170707 4701 41776 IlU O. 0611ar'. 14C ALMS 111
102111011 LW a cup 61"271 • 0. 70 • 101 14• 1•46
• 00 Ii II; 2Oa 1 M u 4 1. QI.00 n a • 11n 161111 776
1.41 07070 l 170 0 7717174 2 0. 07061@1.
47.70 n. R 70•14. ! 111 Kano. 11 i. 1 141 702 1.
MI6 Mint/ 0 1•11111 UM Ism.
W
W
• 4-
W
0.
cc
O
O
1)
LL_
U
a.
O.
z
W
cow
3
INTERURBAN AVENUE
•
{Ct
e,4 01 0 .i 10
1•00,1 »pp
1»14 rr1. 1••e
.11 ,==
�4
'
w NNII my.
.1111."• .
NIN• 0.01
ATINNw 0N11. 1.000010•00111
.,a•.•rv.~:•.1•. �.! Sul
v 0.00.1Ir
0114.•»»••»
iTil
n
1CWN7OV 0I61640
411,1414 Cn1417 4•
2i•114 ••••14nV
VV•MN OONld �I
LI
NI
'70",4,4 H44NI O•W 6,2/0'004M2rc •d04 1044 K' 4
aN SgnVwc 4W ■0se01 4,Q.0 .INI•M1t1a4 1.1ddV '1dVV.4'1.
0114,0104 dO .0.4, 4,01 01N1 17 IOIOV O'N 101/700•110d•1 WOO
'Cc eGL.7 0141 <4I1d1 . 4101110Gd01.< A4IN .9 de 11.101•1* 0.
0114/•0104 19 a1 a•dv 0.764 9N1014V'1d 114 :H01v414•11ed ••C< •
•7LG NO c1141 eH' dr1 ON IVY 04141 •
•1 wen 1H0Vd 10004, •r•IM•b.A Lv
4I01A71HL NI 011nN0.17 10 01 1144 41144 ONI1r4V144 '•1v •
evilVV
•At4elVrOV 11410 WQW* 114INN w011"1 NV•14 74 11VHc
911.1dQ w91NN 1VLL1 41fl0 0aW4e 70 111.10 44014 1141.•
0014
2411141 4OM 41CI#1 1111.V417 '10W0 de ,7 14011 •x.'11 •
WnPdMAV 00 Oa 1•1714.11, N•'1••■101
414,010 'NO11M0I441 1MV9 1 1141 0111V a9 01 Va•.• .-1 inv1d •
C31CN
Aev C.NHVI4
7VHn4 NV04.1 •1C
,1114 r
V71vrV N11•0t4an1
,A17N0, NOvdr10G100HV 1i
4•1NNIWNNM
I4.411,4M G01AHdV11.01741.#
.1?411V1 ,r1,Lvri O.
enGVVa•a04nV1 4r1HNVe
11141 114■VH4 da4.
ne024. Wr1d rte 4374
1 ;34`4,441 9 NIQ1I fl 43C04040
Crr3dndVnd Cn1Gl7 %
ayvW ,laclmc a u
741Vnc as naar%1
antral.
NOM Nb000
an4114•bnv9
L4rwenGln 01
AN C,NNVH
cN•■H 4112H Vvaaau
ti
- r
1
144114171a11614 44V110
114Id N6iy14M
••VAIN 4r,Nle 1,1
NOO• 4I1'.'1v cn •/I
?/L•rrK rv•. �we�.,•1•c
vrvIHd Al 4 1-'l b
"Mitre, .N7N1411 Q110.
HrUVNl71r7 y1N L
4Ya••a'X7d11v1 4m 1 1
T r1MI V 7N1114
AdM 901.44,4 x.•
AN G,Nw.l
µl. 41114 w100 4
NOM0+104tl01-14 9
T`i`4 •, CN
NOI 1;148- G
710rl. 4 Q]TNN 04V1•Id
.b1-4105.677 WP: 0111V?I 4e,
N••10c
/At. —.4.40-WittrAllimegt,,
e! ; ' t t+I
7504,440,0 4,114710
Snaah:rune 4rU417 it
•1NN1.101NNM
•ln 40 c011.H.1v.14 a'1
Arl GNH•H
NH•4I• 74I11H 291031
9504.6.70 1 d11 -760
4naand'ne 61144 {•
CEN14179 1111/1
AW4w1
,1an41101 •JNI'I44, c.nrIll HrINYn4■A O1
40N4star4o1.4 Irnl JN
7V104I4.044 VLW1na*O4 4nnnaa 4
1.40710^gaw04•4
v1.1s0V N13a1,9e1n1
•4,112110 0071"rYal4. NOIO14410Cd04+404
2Re7 v1
411•14"I0IO, "21!7/)•760
NO1JaN7400O1-1•4 5