Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-226-84 - GULL INDUSTRIES - SERVICE STATION EXPANSIONGULL INDUSTRIES 13435 INTERURBAN AV S EPIC - 226 -84 WAC 197 -11 -1350 DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Expansion & Remodel of existing service station Proponent Gull Industries Location of proposal 13435 Interurban Avenue South. . Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 226 -84 This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible official Brad Collins_ Position /title Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845 Date ?- Lt -S Signature 6A -4-,et 0 4 City of Tukwila 1908 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor May 3, 1984 Gull Industries 3404 4th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98134 RE: EPIC - 226 -84 Dear Applicant: Chapter 43.21C.RCW requires the attached notice be given in order to limit any potential appeal of the City's decision to issue a Declaration of Nonsignificance for your proposal. The City leaves the decision to give this notice to you. If you elect to give notice, it is your responsibility to follow the attached Section 43.21C.80. Our recommendation is that you give this notice to minimize exposure to any appeals on environmental basis. Potential delay to _your project could occur if 43.21C.80 RCW is not followed. Respectf 11 y Rick reeler Associate Planner RB /blk CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: C91 BLDG PLNG I P.W. FIRE PROJECT 6.0 LL Sc_t I C.._.• 5'CpSjlckS �(Oi'\- LOCATION I -35- IIl-.aoesl ps,,t , S . DATE TRANSMITTED dd (Sk734- STAFF COORDINATOR p , •N g - jOS EPIC 22.x- 8 FILE 1cK -(p-4 POLICE P & R F_L-Thiv-- FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY qk [8 t 6(f /300613 , RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH ''CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 110- cLaciit,o_LJ DATE -i‘ —ry COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM •CN —(c$ EPIC FILE D12-(0 TO: BLDG I PLNG P.W. [ FIRE 1 POLICE P &R PROJECT (IOU,— 9E)(W lC-§i..ScPSr..611,3 Cro4us IQIV IMANeN_ LOCATION 13 -35 (/l�'(�Q„0 tfj`j pf•(,' _ . S , FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 4C(3I-- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT nn AA ( DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM RCN 84 -K EPIC 22.x— E> FILE 4 TO: ( ( BLDG 670 PLNG rIgn P.W. ' FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT 60u_ �,� l L� $VPS�1 c* c_A t ((uN 12L- ry 1c4)a..- LOCATION 1?4-35 iti7CI&2Ut2F ., , S, FILE NO. ( j X15001 DATE TRANSMITTED ` 1 (3)2 ¢ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY �} 1818e+ 3 1 �— STAFF COORDINATOR t" 15, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE _PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT c- Pt-cc. S s7-cio y f2 2u ( Kin /7S Aveyg - poi o 0 vim. _ .11( e G1.)-kr) w r yy1 0Q-/ w 5 o l I.M%L-k- A'vlittr:t t y,c /.s M11-,1 "Fe u1 /Zto I ck M4-1 T /Z- fIli. DATE C4 at) /-&11 COMMENTS PREPARED BY .117 C.P.S. Form 11 �ICITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM .. 4 BY APR 1 3 1984 TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BURER(l ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE PROJECT (ALL 5 1(N,,S LOCATION 43 S lot,einEpie 3 DATE TRANSMITTED T I (3 124- STAFF COORDINATOR ,, g4- �cS EPIC 226— E4' FILE 0K-(o-84 POLICE •CN P &R FILE NO. f RESPONSE REQUESTED BY qk 1 18181(- 18181(- PpA0613 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE Oh 4-- 4 - /6- rt\- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN 54 -JUG EPIC 22.6, — ¢" F I L E Die,- (, - g 4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE at POLICE P & R PROJECT ()LL- S 2N 1 Li '5C 1 ;Y,4 -(c 'l i.'.L'(V1 Z LOCATION f -3 S loNe(ZUC2 pNt. . S , FILE NO. _ DATE TRANSMITTED T I (3 124- STAFF COORDINATOR t, RESPONSE REQUEST RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE _PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ( -? 4. -X 19 s' e, � F .,, � � � c i» l Y 1 /i/ c Q is•/ n% DATE O F C tit _r 9 A el? J J .c� 4r v r F ,� e � Ai /' O F79-f is .v ,� IE !4 c U t R `��ia Fri n I h / 1' sr )-4 ^Jo ? e A 7 F RS' i N / n G -oon Aec r iQ L� / Ti d n/i4 r COMMENTS PREPARED BY J L S/,i eta C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG 1 PLNG P.W. FIRE PROJECT (.ALL s"C lc* -- 1;(ON LOCATION (-35 itirleeUr�, , S DATE TRANSMITTED ‘H (3 )2+ STAFF COORDINATOR LL OCN 84 -jUS EPIC 22 c— FILE D & -G-,e4 POLICE P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY [818 /.300i93 111 _---- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART - 41ENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE V - COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Control Number J- -94 -16S CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 'P FiVI i-111 Lb 09 L U\ is OPR b 19R4 2�0..tNN jNG DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with. the�°app1-rcatton° for • permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official•that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. . A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental. Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. • I .BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: ( Ulf lIndUS IeS I14L 2. Address and Phone Number. of Proponent: 31-40t- L-+ 4 e &At . fl oe Gu4k qg L'3'- ('b6) 5°l e o 3. Date Checklist Submitted: Li,G✓8`T 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: o• eU.IGw%Lt. • 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 1 Auli. 71 1.1 '4Wiodal 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size', general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding, of its scope and nature): -vtlavvi6 atAd Ygmactel ekusbnci b_w1i i tAl tr. use as a cm /mevIce inAc,vket si %6 ((1(o (,1‘124e7 sh cj . 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): WL$b S1ce o4 10 1-ev uTiockv► 4 Ue )ort so u+k _.1 twist, diva. .1M cve -ipts . S. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: © beir 19M- 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): YES ' NO ✓ YES NO ✓ YES 1./ NO (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit • , (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: bald Lhk- ,ev'uv"bw Ave ,Gta l 2view . YES NO YES N0 ✓ YES ✓ NO YES NO YES NO ✓ YES ✓ NO YES ✓ NO YES ✓ NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: '1o. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: M.en 90..c\ '?.use l,:d� i�. t�' Tie d la L -evv v4bcti Ave t>M trtQemevfi 12'. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: -AkktklecIC, Mt( bP luleAv ci C u vi e viv tk G� A" f cieu4 ~ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil ?. (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b)' The creation of'objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e). Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration . of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? • (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by .cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? (i) Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or . endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5.. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural. resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release �f hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulati®n or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for'new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including YES MAYBE NO tz (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signat e and Title Date. :s • 61T- Ott 40".1144 ka,si rt-N4T-Nk1 "I • e-.1-rrt4*. er.A.N.Q.• •.• 00t- _. sy.-7'__.. • ..: ,---'-e5 -..... 1 ---..p ........0 ...• -......c , • • -1-111.• • -.70F•••• 40 41413 CLAW% 0.0of • otla ...roal bur-voids tie,/ e.e.s. rar IsvP IV be g.k. Los • • • • • • - • - • _ 411 rus.o 4:24 Fr-e.criseres-t sssoNe., ..311930,•0:4*. .• 3.• 6./.3 . . 1., • -.4i 15*—,1*-741:-.41- - 7. - ..,,r,-:.,--:€. . 7: s.',..,;-. . ,. . -. 7::,;:tw,-e,..-,.;,..L.z.:1•;;;,22_,"1-:,7,,z,s,;:s.,...—rs.,-..4.., - - • r-7:.7.-, --.4 , • - .- slir's....:,, .......4.-Z-_,,... -7,..zs,.. 0.: 114' -:7-- .• • ttit3I t(417 Ari....-1.41-. , .. -- I - - - -......" ".;..., . :.,-,.. ar--,....... - -..-----,-. --- --1,50-„. " -' --P-1:,r-1-..1"-•re*-!- old( Olsgesissus..1 tartp■ti nor, 11 I101."-I• EzOlt. c--Ja-hrl It :+cv/ Lie2 41-04c. 40.1e. • 1—‘Z--s-. 0TVe-A; z-rdc- csiee, • 7:-. • s 1-; • _ ..41151 etsvoir) arra;t1r.'..en -••-• • 413/07L. "14.121ra-.."11-0. 41. • • 2,0%.(28' ,GOIrlikCi — • — 4., ft — pinak pleasse..4 rsoue iota' 1 5s'.420 LEL 114K F'oriwi4 7.4.1 ',11E--•°4E-j.1 VONJC.TiO; ;o4 Ti. w Y.:, 9P' -.9g....LTIO?.j 14, "re‘11,J5PIP, 7. 5 , 6 lie: z4-: L9r '21, 14 -so. rr 1....-W•%2WE. A.:Lek. 50 *21.. 11. k. I b..-1-it-Pkito..1 wig ..pawl^,.I 17:- 1,-1 ' 0 30 *I air en WO 2i .s.k.11 300 4 CZE.0.527.5.12) •40.I 410 44•7,11 9r_tsit 1c. 4 7 rr. 1,16. a f*-1167 4 vo 4.4,-xv. ,erni 41414 -7 t ,,,:, , , .• ,.... ”-a•--.• ir.....ti, 2f: Nt, , , "I• fi . • (11 , ...‘„, 91; „ ••:„n•• '01. Gt •,....... .-C.X.-11.1:1•401--r—f4-lak-I1,61 I _ Lin Er• Loki Vs.L.L. Cer40•01. 31tAGt. er .1.4r4 / cam • Per- • I -1; •,..• vi.lw cry rvix,r= e p.4(.1 L'67-7.,5 • 0 ttr-s'--)1 - eCiet 43. . 11.4.5 (g.e.t •Ncies. Eaaa.c.a.0) (;) Sc.. 1,1444 er.4 & L. es:s. Csitc"..1,St7C.04.f._ 1.1e47e1.-%. OE.L.si, • era.rtca. ' 4'0,T Ar_asi Itzebz.ss-Tvo se/ Lupo cisrxm. t. .5,04 7.-41tr•.■6, "ksL•yru-as"-.1%."1 4. rseS75 tss--e-tvv.. I.' bees- • : 4:4d. P.M>. '!-J riele. 4'61044 e:— alF'ho.nr-z- ittryit.e.6.1 Nevi; ft. • 4 I . I • -s. 5t.c.--nou _ • ■ John aerkland architect 0111PR CI r t asattle,teraohlnetert 11031-•11163 to sy n 0. •010 in N. ICSISILVt3: Ton, 1 •■••••• • ••••••• - -- I34b If-r,r_zu2-27&1.1 I • — - to. O-C;••_2—.4aF 0 • J�2.1 1.1 EL.61- LE-IA.1104 0 t. 4- Z., to I 5 0 L'40"01! 114 so.na U-r5 k4 \•-.i4 John aerkland architect 5220 r It way n a. otota tt le, waeningttOn 25105 523 -5512 to. Miff MD magma JO. • stist•o; •••••••••• 4-Q LL STATiaki .1,1.1107 4 1:415L J e°5 13435 IkrittZ,L1D1.1