The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-227-84 - 11 PROPERTY OWNERS - 51ST AVENUE SOUTH ANNEXATION51" AVE ANNEXATION EPIC - 227 -84 WAC 197 -11 -1350 DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Annexation of 3.48 acres along 51st Ave. S. Proponent 11 Property Owners Location of proposal 51st Ave. S. between S. 161st St. & S. 164th St. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No.EPIC- 227 -84 This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible official Brad Collins Position /title Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845 Date 1-4' -2-3 - 8� Signature 6-14_ CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. PROJECT 5("sr k P ?flC LOCATION 4 ( M (C DATE TRANSMITTED G P ig+ STAFF COORDINATOR FIRE • CN EPIC 2�� -84- FILE POLICE P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 8 c.)or3 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND'COMMENT BELOW: TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM DATE COMMENT COMA, 41 /5 v 1 J t J .e'xp} 9 7L /,, ) h Sc. e. . 5 ec4.7 of /,,roDr;afG . t fh/h, by v 540 ✓ /.L ,re xp ; n1 a . f Gl i- /AS 4'" Gk >S • how Solde-84v401 fe o f c- -P -oii 7Ie /* l Se ✓,l'/ e S i-- es 4.- /o Ge /-/ 07z' ) ' as te c/ w/ d ti r i°1 Col gl, 6-91f._5 0"-F c e- 54 01y, .f f ;5 ,jgt-71/cam /ar-- 1 nn -t-X 4 /Asti rtli :, 71- j-- ✓r7 O ✓ 71-- f0 be_ A_ -Fo-/ er , R r Q f) )41; h 1 S f `0 c 011 e . 1 14/-0-- 1A/d/ 1-4 ‘q J jn 71c. f`4--Vi 7 4 a v e_._ 7 -D G-04 Sider' CO Al . S ,rte c' f- 111 ghh;N 9 A- fire 5 9-a 71/ ay i this gre4 g f 8 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKW'ILA. CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 70: F-1 BLDG [ PLNG P.W. PROJECT .j( Si" ' -. IlYPI-1( ) LOCATION M ( M(C X k �'rtTS DATE TRANSMITTED 41 P/84 ill CN 8` -��z. EPIC 22-) -a+ FILE FIRE El POLICE n P & R STAFF COORDINATOR 46. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE:ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILETS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF .COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU' WISH CARRIED'TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, :BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE. MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 8 ,3 (ndi 14, - hAe-- AtIAL- .9474( DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form it From Speed Message 'ilsofJones WLINE FORM 44-900 2 -PART 23 - PRINTED IN U.S.A. 184 ................................. .................. ................. .................. ...... ............................ ........ ......................... • ........... • ............. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: I BLDG PLNG P.W. PROJECT 5('sr AO 7- LOCATION M N (Ctla� DATE TRANSMITTED G- p/84- 411 CN 8 - p52 EPIC ?2 —g�- FILE FIRE POLICE 1211 P & R STAFF COORDINATOR 5, FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 8 c.%13 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT . Apose. Gac # .... .rQ..o r Vig L/,14 10"4C-c. ■•••e44.71/41... ® vow .1.--.1•0«-%1 a ....� /��,�. -...2� G ✓e i/: cw A... £ w.: // * !lo ■!'it.■4.*-44- .r¢ rNep i oEet, 7'j'. 101 isoL • r-e- et ✓ eat d rt . -41.1e-se "Aet DATE 4/ — /f' %y COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 1L, • ' l i. � 1 <I�� e p4 :.;I T :.:i- t...,...LA �-s -rues lien -na -1 ust be completed and submitted with the application for .permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a. permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible - Official previously agree an Environmental. impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany -the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the' threshold determination. CITY OF TUKWI LA • -84' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 51st. Ave. :S. Annexation 2. Address and Phone Number.' of Proponent: See Notice of Intent To Commence Annexation 3.' Date Checklist Submitted: 21_L Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5 Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6 Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Annexation of King County area to the City of Tukwila 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the and area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental sett' =ng of the proposal): West side of 51st Ave. S. between S. 161st St. and S. 164th St. consist- inq of 3.48 acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1984 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO X (f) Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (i) Curb cut permit YES NO X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO X (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO X (1) Other: Ordinance approval by City Council of the annexation and approval of the King County Boundary Review Board. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or,connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Not the applicants. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Other property owners to north propose a separate annexation. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Annexation petition - formal application for annexation. City ordinance - approving annexation application. II °. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? - (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface.relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: No development of property involved. Physical improvements exist and are not proposed. 2. Air. Will the proposa -1 result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -I) . Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of .flood waters? (d) Change -in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any 'alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? - 3- • : • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage • of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: (See Note Item II-1) 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? • (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X X . Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration X or movement of fauna? — (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) YES MAYBE NO X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Land use will not be changed from existing single family useage. King County zoning is RS -7200. Existing lot size relative to conformance is RS -7200. City Comprehensive Plan shows single family residentia for the area. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanatioe.: (See Note Item II -1) 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of. an accident or upset conditions? • Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X X • : • . 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, . or growth rate of the human population of an area ?;: YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Existing King County zoning of RS -7200 may be more dense than what City would consider in view of adjacent City zoning of R -1 -12.0. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, Or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanatior.; Additional development beyond what exists is not proposed in the annexation action. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection ?. (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X X X (f) .Other governmental services? Explanation: Police service currently exists and will be minimally expanded. Part of Fire District 24. Regular fire protection service will be required. Long range consideration of these services will be considered in the City budget process. Planning, Building and Public Works Departments will be required to review building permits and development permits in the area, as well as 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: respond to requests for assistance. (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: (See Note Item I1 -1) 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) .Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste_and disposal? Explanation:. (See Note Item II -1) 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: .(See Note Item II -1) X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista.or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: (See Item II -1) 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. Tukwila facilities continue to be available to these residents, but Parks and Recreation Department will include the area in planning for future facilities in the City. 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: None known in the specific area. CERTIFICATION BY PREPARER.r I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title /27 77a Date X X X CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. PROJECT 5( sr(�,R��' LOCATION NA (D Ts DATE TRANSMITTED • CN 8` - 05 EPIC 72,-) -8+ FILE FIRE POLICE P & R STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 8 oot3 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE /% 7� COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ^,nib • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Th+- -ears= ;en a-i-.e -must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible• Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. • CITY OF TUKWILA'�L-ZZ7 -S4 A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 51st Ave. S. Annexation 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: See Notice of Intent To-Commence Annexation 3. Date Checklist Submitted: /1111(,_ (7,(yfi¢ 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: '6 Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, :general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Annexation of King County area to the City of Tukwila 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under - standing,of the environmental setting of the proposal): West side of 51st Ave. S. between S. 161st St. and S. 164th St. consist- inq of 3.48 acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1984 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) .King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO X (f)' Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (1) Curb cut permit YES NO X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO X (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO X (1) Other: Ordinance approval by City Council of the annexation and approval of the King County Boundary Review Board. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or.connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Not the applicants. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Other property owners to north propose a separate annexation. 12.• Attach. any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal;.if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such .application form: .Annexation .petition - formal application for annexation. City ordinance - approving annexation application. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface.relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO X X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X X Explanation: No development of property involved. Physical improvements exist and are not proposed. 2. Air: Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in,currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? • (b) Changes.in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sun`face water runoff? (.c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ( ) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality; either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ,endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,'or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X X (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) YES MAYBE NO X 7. Light and Glare.. Will the.proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Land use will not be changed from existing single family useage. King County zoning is RS -7200. Existing lot size relative to conformance is RS -7200. City Comprehensive Plan shows single family residentia for the area. 9. Natural Resources. Will.the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 'Explanatioa: (See Note Item II -1) 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of.an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X X X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population 'of an area? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Existing King County zoning of RS -7200 may be more dense than what City would consider in view of adjacent City zoning of R -1 -12.0. 12. Housin4. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? ' X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities,.or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X .(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? • X .Expl anatioo.: Additional development beyond what exists is not proposed in the annexation action. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: • (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X X X (f) . Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Police service currently exists and will be minimally expanded. Part of Fire District 24. Regular fire protection service will be required. Long range consideration of these services will be considered in the City budget process. Planning, Building and Public Works Departments will be required to review building permits and development permits in the area, as well as I5 Energy. Will the proposal result in: respond to requests for assistance. (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? '(e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: '(See Note Item II -1) 17. Human. Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: ,`(See Note Item II -1) X X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: (See Item I.1 -1) . 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. Tukwila facilities continue to be available to these residents, but Parks and Recreation Department will include the area in planning for future facilities in the City. 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: None known in the specific area. CERTIFICATION BY PREPARER.1: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead aoency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title f pc--e P.: -Iee/, 77 • X X X CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. PROJECT 5j (Sr Pty fl)qWt� ) LOCATION M, DATE TRANSMITTED 4-- (-,g4- STAFF COORDINATOR FIRE CN 8 "-c 52 EPIC 72 -8+ FILE POLICE P &R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 8 3o0 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. COMMENT hAS 94 .et ItAA140AVtl 4461K /‘ 4D DATE (//?(-)43V 7011` COMMENTS PREPARED BY 7 C.P.S. Form 11 C, CY r li....._!h fio-ri„„�ust be completed and submitted with the application for ..permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a. permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental. Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of S50.00.must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. CITY OF TUKWILA • L - �-�-8+ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 51st Ave. S. Annexation 2. Address and Phone Number. of Proponent: See Notice of Intent To Commence Annexation 3. Date Checklist Submitted: u.L pf tvw. 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size,'general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Annexation of King County area to the City of Tukwila 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under -. standing of the environmental seffing of the proposal): West side of 51st Ave. S. between S. 161st St. and S. 164th St. consist- inq of 3.48 acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1984 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit. YES NO X (f) Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (i) Curb cut permit YES NO X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO X (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO X (1) Other: Ordinance approval by City Council of the annexation and approval of the King County Boundary Review Board.. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Not the applicants. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Other property owners to north propose a separate annexation. 12. Attach. any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be:filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Annexation petition - formal application for annexation. City ordinance - approving annexation application. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface. relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: No development of property involved. Physical improvements exist and are not proposed. 2. .Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X X X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either-marine or fresh waters? 4 X (b) Changes in .absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of seface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of 'surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- • • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either . through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) YES MAYBE. NO X X 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to. the migration X or movement of fauna? • (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) YES MAYBE NO X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Land use will not be changed from existing single family useage. King County zoning is RS -7200. Existing lot size relative to conformance is RS -7200. City Comprehensive Plan shows single family residentia for the area. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of.an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X • ; • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,. or, growth rate of the human population of an area ?: YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Existing King County zoning of RS -7200 may be more dense than what City would consider in view of adjacent City zoning of R -1 -12.0. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, Or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation; Additional development beyond what exists is not proposed in the annexation action. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, . or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection ?. (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X X X (f) .Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Police service currently exists and will be minimally expanded. Part of Fire District 24. Regular fire protection service will be required. Long range consideration of these services will be considered in the City budget process. Planning, Building and Public Works Departments will be required to review building permits and development permits in the area, as well as 15 Energy. Will the proposal result in: respond to requests for assistance. (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources. of energy? X Explanation: (See Note Item I1 -1) 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or•natu'ral gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste-and disposal? Explanation:. (See Note Item II -1) 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: .(See Note Item II -1 • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: (See Item II -1) 19. .Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity.of exist- ing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. Tukwila facilities continue to be available to these residents, but Parks and Recreation Department will include the area in planning for future facilities in the City. 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: None.kn_own in the specific area. CERTIFICATION BY PREPARER. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. r Signature and Title OCR �1: P\F2 -8- X X X • ■ �ivv� _ ONO Uk( JPS • Speed Message From • • Subject, :5'1 [C \t 5'. eS"Qv` 1< fM.t3 Date 41 1• ? I -17>o�`� r,l) versa -\ ri t0C( Ttt \I zScQL\ , ZOO NO ■fiSas C NJ, . 111117. r. uZ14- ..S • \ C Pr1 Signed WilsonJones GRAYLINE FORM 44 -900 2 -PART X7983 • PRINTED IN U.S.A. 184 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG 1 1 P.W. PROJECT 5-r->r A NL, mw 'nom) LOCATION M.( 41(C — -TS DATE TRANSMITTED 4-1 p /a 4 STAFF COORDINATOR L , FIRE CN &—c52 EPIC 72,7 -gdf- FILE POLICE P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4- H 84 NU01L) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 EMT Fr APR 1 y. 1984 CITY OF TUKWILA Vet L-27 -7-84 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM C(i Y ui= d'uK,:z,,LA PLANNING. —I s—q on rc Just be completed ,and submitted with the application .for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a • permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 51st .Ave. S. Annexation 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: See Notice of Intent To Commence Annexation '3. Date Checklist Submitted:V1,L 4 Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5 Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Annexation of King County area to the City of Tukwila 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): West side of 51st Ave. S. between S. 161st St. and S. 164th St. consist- ing of 3.48 acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1984 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO X • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X YES NO X (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO X (1) Other: Ordinance approval by City Council of the annexation and approval of the King County Boundary Review Board. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or :connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Not the applicants. • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Other property owners to north propose a separate annexation. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Annexation petition - formal application for annexation. City ordinance - approving annexation application. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1 Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface.relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X X Explanation: No development of property involved. Physical improvements exist and are not proposed. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: (See Note Item II -I) X X X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements., in either marine or fresh waters? _ X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration X or movement of fauna? — (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Land use will not be changed from existing single family useage. King County zoning is RS -7200. Existing lot size relative to conformance is RS -7200. City Comprehensive Plan shows single family residentia for the area. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X X • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?' YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: Existing King County zoning of RS -7200 may be more dense than what City would consider in view of adjacent City zoning of R -1 -12.0. 12. Housing.. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) X 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, . bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: Additional development beyond what exists is not proposed in the annexation action. • 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X' X X X (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: Police service currently exists and will be minimally expanded. Part of Fire District 24. Regular fire protection service will be required. Long range consideration of these services will be considered in the City budget process. Planning, Building and Public Works Departments will be required to review building permits and development permits in the area, as well as 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: respond to requests for assistance. (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO X Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) .Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? .(e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: (See Note Item II -1) 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: .(See Note Item X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: (See Item II -1) 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:,. Tukwila facilities continue to be available to these residents, but Parks and Recreation Department will include the area in planning for future facilities in the City. 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: None known in the specific area. CERTIFICATION BY'PREPARER.. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title -8- X X X