The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-238-84 - OVEROAD CONTAINER SERVICE - TRUCK TERMINALOVEROAD CONTAINER SERVICE 5F9 STRANDER BLVD EPIC - 238 -84 WAC 197 -11 -1350 DECLARATION'OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Truck Terminal Proponent Overoad Container Service, Inc. Location of proposal 569 Strander Blvd. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 238 784 This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of, a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible official Brad Collins Position /title Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845 Date % -z'L— 8� Signature • 0 Subject &14 From �� ,`•� -�g�. 0 0 • ( c s Date 1 Wiisorgones GRAYLINE FORM 44 -900 2 -PART 01983 • PRINTED IN U.S.A. CITY OF TUKWILA . CENTRAL PERMIT 'SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 41"N 84 - EPIC FILE 34 TO: 41 ;LDG PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE PROJECT ()\{UNTO (� qISq?Q_ S Y2 (E 1/..)C- . LOCATION 5.(9 `� Pskm9 c A0 DATE TRANSMITTED 4441e4 STAFF COORDINATOR . FILE NO. P RESPONSE' REQUESTED BY 61 tql84- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE'OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,._ AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT J1A) DATE COMMENTS PREPARED. BY C.P.S. Form 11 ,;CITY OF TUKWILA / CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM •CN 84-140 • EPIC 23O`c 4 FILE $4 -23 -we TO: BLDG NI PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE PROJECT \p'2(, No ( '5. (tjg2._ sra2mcE 1& LOCATION s(g9 `,`j17.}() DATE TRANSMITTED 6(I 4 1e4 STAFF COORDINATOR , 13, P & R FILE NO. RESPONSCREQUESTED BY 61 tc(184- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. 1/6 DATE /tom L ■ArGir-Al e COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 / Control Number o' CITY OF TUKkWI LA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless. the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of So 0.0D must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. ..BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Overoad Container /service 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 569 Strander B1. 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4/16/84 4. Agency Requiring Checklist:, City of Tukwila 5. game of Proposal, if applicable: N/A 6. Nature and Brief Description of the 'Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that wil-1 dive an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 7. Location•of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of e envi ronm al etti ng of the proposal) : 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO X CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM. cN 84- (40 La 14 1984 EPIC S�- 3" TUKWILA B FIRE PREVENTION UR EAU LE Z ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE PROJECT ( '-M.FD (Ck'j' LOCATION 5(°( ��c�L two FILE NO. P & R DATE TRANSMITTED /(1,4 RESPONSE' REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR, , THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH .THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED GI 14I84- ITEM COMMENT i5 a r,y jhOP '*1 q 71--j or7 0e-s-0‘ f 4v a" re) % f Tor GIJinft, . What /5 fA "- 0 el) et"/ ".4 14l►dvgi j,2E'� I CIS --h ✓% roh rr) b'SAe-55 ,41s 5;4 C, (-- Tq4)./ /) 44=f DATE b l y --- "1 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Control Number p +— CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM, This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official-that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of S60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. .BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Overoad Container /service 2. Address and Phone !lumber of Proponent: 569 Strander B1. 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4/16/84 4. Agency Requiring Checklist :. City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: N/A 6. P;ature and Brief Description of the Proposal. (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will aive an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and .local): (a). Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO X 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing .parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: in: YES MAYBE NO X x 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for.new or altered . governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) (d) Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? t ....LI.C.. F,..4144-4ne ;.,^11,i4 nn OFFItE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA TO /J ,Z/9tidt/ /4/ /2A.7- FROM: ,Strike �OLIc� DATE: SUBJECT: • CITY OF TUKWILA . CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM fCN 64-140 EPIC FILE 34- Z3'UJi� TO: BLDG PLNG 1 P.W. FIRE la POLICE Y . PROJECT (-)\,c(22 cc &J cam 2 C._-- 1& • LOCATION 5499 `.� 1?_s wo FILE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED //e41 4 i RESPONSUREQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR , P & R 61 Iql84- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 77W,9G is 7?P fch- 77 ,l /f /c, ut.o e">9 i ,moo c ti. 7.1! 1 s A 7>157c/".E-/'ti . 7-H7" C.,l�pr/vr�S • /g C�e�� i!/oT .<Jti 77c i/JA 79"v.4 .-9,4! 7 /o,t/9 z_ �D1 /erg 5^1,PU/ c t /V ilwf 2, DATE / cf,' COMMENTS PREPARED. BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 1 1 BLDG PROJECT r. PLNG ' 1GL P.W. LOCATION S (a 9 `.� 0Zy2_ 15 LV) •cN 84-1 EPIC FILE 34_7_3-63e FIRE POLICE -P-&`R FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED ' (,414-1S4 RESPONSE' REQUESTED BY 61 (C{(4' STAFF COORDINATOR' C. �. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT DATE / y /,-4/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG j P.W. .CN P4- 140 EPIC • FILE 34_25-we FIRE [ POLICE P R O J E C T I > N 1 a 2 Z : c z k I t i 2 . _ s e a m L& - LOCATION ,5 CCY `,� ,00iz Y) DATE TRANSMITTED (4I 4 l STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE' REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED 61 Iql84- ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Control Number �+— ( flLIK'J1[1\VB CITY OF TUKWJLA APR 3 0 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY C; .i t.:` ., v t A PLANNING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible ufficial previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of 40.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Overoad Container /service 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 569 Strander Bl. 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4/16/84 4. Agency Requiring Checkl i st: . City of Tukwila . 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: N/A 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal. (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to hive an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a). Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES NO X (d) Puget Sound Air. Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm.water system permit (i) Curb cut permit • (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: . YES NO YES NO .x YES NO' ,x , YES NO X YES NOL YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:. N,O 11. Do you know of any plans by others.which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NO II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO • (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? - x (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? x (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes.in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b)* The creation of'objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, Dr the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water' in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or thro°n interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavatic = :: ' YES MAYBE NO YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? x (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? x Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the- proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,: or in a. barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: •x x x x 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise. levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of are explosion or the release �f hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:. (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for.new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of Public facilities, including YES MAYBE NO x x x x x x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO: x x. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? x. (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Storm water drainage? x, (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 0 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or, view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in . an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building`? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation' or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title �P--G ,me, • INWNIP •••1••••111.1 !If rrr,w iI Fn[l• 1107 IN OAP .n /f'J.M11/11'J • • 11� '4`> f�'2 -Iri -..\--S&04014 .247 OP r_- [.v.i L• . ;t.i., • . 1:11 U t4 I T 40,000 sa F T) • 400 - O' COQ DOCK LEVEL G� PET. 'AV_ bNT K 1 1 107F-1G6 .1._ . 1!- • •`JaJI. ` � VV \. :fit V — L.; U 1T wA' (40,000 F1!!. FL. • 4• UNIT ''P5` (40 000' . cc) ['i'io) FIN.FL. R67: i j;s,• J .11NLG'cM) EW ►J1EUT r �- - ;LC: ri:; ...t• ;!.)07 Ilfti- - • .. . 0 •z C'trr 0.1. .-"- FC ('r • t• • I. 1• . T .. \.l L )L\\.i F P: WALL.— ' : Fri:- .1 �. _ • ' .. _1 -� --T �:.1 j■ ..1 r1 1j I T ' A' '4 o, 0o o `-i4 cr.) r . r L Lt'y7l • .■:,e\rra VS9 •ry 1 a