The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-239-84 - DOCHNAHL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - OFFICE AND WAREHOUSEBOWERS MFG 13032 INTERURBAN AV S F.PIG 239 -84 WAC 197 -11 -1350 DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Construction of Warehouse and Office Building Proponent Dochnahl Construction Co. Location of proposal 13032 Interurban Ave. S. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 239 -84 This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible official Brad Collins Position /title Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter'Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845 Date 7/2e /e y Signature To t- --)V—V `t`J(-v • • Speed Messnue From • ■ Subject rc w zs Date (JVL -. 26 19 ! --f ^r snPP U S tkf 4 S - • Signed WilsonJones GRAYLINE FORM 44-900 2-PART C1983 • PRINTED IN U.S.A. .ORDER NO. 371451 EXHIBIT "I" JUN 21 1984 CITY OF TUKV!,LA PLANNING DEPT. That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38 and of the C. C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37, in Sections 10, 11, 14, and 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. " 1., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears north 40 °01'05'. West 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of intersection of a curve on the centerline of the Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet south of the quarter corner • between said Sections 14 and 15; thence north 49 °24'00" West 835.00 feet on a line.parallel to and 150.00 feet northeasterly of the centerline of said Duwamish- Renton junction road, to a point which bears north 81 °44'55" .East'199.17 feet from the point of curve on the centerline of the said Duwamish- Renton junction road, said point of curve being approximately 1,200 feet north and 440 feet west of the quarter corner between said Sections 14 and 15, thence south 40 °36'00" West 20 feet to the northeasterly margin of the right -of -way of'the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence north 49 °2!00" West along said rightof -way, 980.29 feet; thence south 49 °24.'-: East'340" feet ; - thence north 40 °36' East 185 feet, to the true • ' ��-point,; of;;beginning of this description; thence North 40 °36' East 185 `: ;`feet,.'tJence north 49 °24'_•west 340 feet, thence south 40 °36'west 185 feet, then00outh'.49 °24':East 340 feet, to the true point of beginning; • EXCEPT the southeasterly 115 feet,thereof; ALSO That portion of. the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 33 and of the C. C. Lewis Donation Clain Rio. 37, in Sections 10, 11, 14 and 15, Township t3 Nortito Range 4 East, IL. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears north 40 °1'05" west 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of Intersection of a curve on a centerline of the Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of Intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet south of the quarter corner between said Sections 14 and 15; thence north 49 °24'00" west 835.00 feet on a line parallel to and 150.00 feet northeasterly of the centerline of said •Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, to a point which bears north 81 °44'55" east 199.17 feet from the point of curve on the centerline of the said Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of curve being approximately 1,200 feet north and 440 feet west of the quarter corner between said Sections 14 and 15; thence south 40 °36'00" west 20 feet to the northeasterly margin of the right -of -way of the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence North 49°24'00" west along said right -of -way, 980.29 feet, thence south 49 °24' east 340 feet; thence north 40 °36' East 185 feet, to the true ORDER N0. 371451 Exhibit "I" Continued point of beginning of this description; thence north 40 °36' east 185 feet; thence north 49 °24' west 115 feet, thence south 40 °36' west 185 feet; thence south 49 °24' east 115 feet, to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Together with an easement for ingress, egress, and underground utilities over the following described tract: That portion of the Stephen Faster ionation Claim t !o. 33 and of the C. C. Lewis Donation Claim `';o. 17 in Sections 10, 11, 14 and Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears North 40.01'05" west 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of intersection of a curve on the centerline of the Juwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet South of the quarter corner between said Sections 14 and 15; thence North 49 °24'00' West 835.00 feet on a line parallel to and 150.00 feet Northeasterly of the centerline of said ►;uwamisii- Renton junction Road, to a point which bears north 31 °44'15' Last 199.17 feet from the poirtt of curve on the centerline of said C'uwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of curve being approximately :':1,200 ,feet 'i'forth and -440 feet West of the quarter corner between said 'Sections-:14 and 15;.thence South 40 °36'00" West 20 feet to the northeasterly • "Imaryin of the right -of -way of the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence Forth 49 °24:.'.00" West along said right -of -way, 640.29 feet to the True Point of beginning of this description; thence South 49 °24' East 60 feet; thence North 40 °36' East 370 feet; thence +forth 49 °24' West GO feet; thence `south 40 °36' West 370 feet to the true point of beginning. ORDER NO. 371451 EXHIBIT "I" Jib L., 1��; _01 ,1 Fi JUN 2 1.1994. PL�if�MNG DEPT. That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38 and of the-C.. C. Lewis Donation Claim 4o. 37, in Sections 10, 11, 14, and 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. t4., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears north 40 °01'05" West 920:15 feet from a monument at the point of intersection of a curve on the centerline of the Dumpish- Renton Junction Road, said point of Intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet south of the quarter - corner: between said Sections 14 and 15; thence north 49 °24'00" West 835.00 feet on a line parallel to and 150.00 feet northeasterly of the centerline of said Uuwamish- Renton junction road, to a point which bears north.81 °44'55 East 199.17 feet from the point of curve on the centerline of.the said.:. Duiaamish- Renton junction road, said point of curve being approximately • 1,200.feet north and 440 feet west of the quarter corner between said: Sections 14 and 15, thence south 40 °36'00" West 20 feet to the northeasterly margin of the right -of -way of -the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence north 49 °24,!.00" West along said rightof -way, 980.29 feet; thence south 49 °24' East' 340'fet;• thence north 40 °36' East 185 feet, to the true , ,'..•polnt:.of :,beginning of this description; thence North 40 °36' East 185 :`±feet, thence north 49 °24' west 340 feet, thence south 40 °36'west 185 feet, thence.•south'49 °24':East 340 feet, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT the southeasterly 115 feet thereof; ALSO That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 313 and of the C. C. Lewis Donation Claim uo. 37, in Sections 10, 11, 14 and 15, Township i3 'North, Range 4 East, W.t . , in King County, Washington, described as follows: beginning at a point which bears north 40 °01'05" west 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of Intersection of a curve on a centerline of the Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet south of the quarter corner between said • Sections 14 and 15; thence north 49'24'00" west 835.00 feet on aline parallel to and 150.00 feet northeasterly of the centerline of said Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, to a point which bears north 81 °44'55" east 199.17 feet from the point of curve on the centerline of the said Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of curve being approximately 1,200 feet north and 440 feet west of the quarter corner between said Sections 14 and 15; thence south 40 °36'00" west 20 feet to the northeasterly margin of the right -of -way of the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence North 49 °24'00" west along said right -of -way, 980.29 feet, thence south 49 °24' east 340 feet; thence north 40 °36' East 185 feet, to the true ORDER NO. 371451 Exhibit "I" Continued point of beginning of this description; thence north 40 °36' east 185 feet; thence north 49 °24' west 115 feet, thence south 40 °36' west 185 feet; thence south 49 °24' east 115 feet, to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Together with an easement for ingress, egress, and underground utilities over the following described tract: That.portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim £!o. 33 and of the C. C. Lewis Donation Claim No. 37 in Sections 10, 11, 14 and 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as .follows:. Beginning at a point which bears North 40.01'051' west 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of intersection of a curve on the centerline of the Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, said point of intersection being approximately 1,000 feet east and 20 feet South of the quarter corner between.said Sections 14 and 15; thence North 49 °24'00" West 835.00 feet on a line parallel to and 150.00 feet Northeasterly of the centerline of said Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, to a point which bears north 81 °44'15" East 199.17 feet from the point of curve on the centerline of said .0uwamish -futon Junction Road, said point of curve being approximately 1,700 -feet North and -440 feet West of the quarter corner between said -, Sections1 4.and 15; thence South 40 °36'00" West 20 feet to the northeasterly ',: nargin'•.,pf the right -of -way of the Puget Sound Electric Railway; thence `' North 49°4O0. " ='West along said right -of -way, 640.29 feet to the True Point of beginning of this description; thence South 49 °24' East 60 feet; thence North 40 °36' East 370 feet; thence North 49 °24' West GO feet; thence South 40 °36' West 370 feet to the true point of beginning. "CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 1/f Agp.L- 411 zy‘-wvo ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM II TO; BLDGPLNG P.W. PROJECT . / V yI'j2, LOCATION ge ,2] j4 DATE TRANSMITTED LPAZ /'y FIRE • CN EPIC FILE YLi -Z2Z QgQ_2 POLICE P &R FILE NO. 2 G (?-gy RESPONSE REQUESTED BY IbCJ`8y STAFF COORDINATOR ,e/e.k.)_,e9V1W RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY . C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ( BLDG PLNG 1 P.W. PROJECT w LOCATION 13 Mg ,Tfiten r-i- DATE TRANSMITTED 6/�2.# STAFF COORDINATOR' FIRE N 2 a7o2r d EPIC ,`Wgy FILE POLICE P &R FILE NO. 6624 C x.39% RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4% OV RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; 1 BLDG PLNG P.W. PROJECT . &L()`[1/, LOCATION 10632 Tka DATE TRANSMITTED toi v1 i./ STAFF COORDINATOR g/ Qlre eve- FIRE •N 24/,;m2 EPIC x,44% FILE POLICE P & R FILE NO. IG .25q L� RESPONSE REQUESTED BY igQ186/ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE 'ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT -_� 124:44 Id s wnmf1/S t tf\ �U■M D ti A-CX - �-� qC�� —f-s DATE 122- V7F 7 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CI-TY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM '1' .. !JUN 2 2 1984 EPIC BY CUJSWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU FILE RECd117) •N 2Lj02 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; I l BLDG I PLNG ( P.W. •FIRE PROJECT. ALL2 iL9) WW. LOCATION / t 9 0-a ,T er DATE TRANSMITTED 0/A241/ STAFF COORDINATOR 6 POLICE P &R FILE NO. £;2 G- 07 3Q 9' RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (0089 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT F/' P-e7Cc74.04 S 1 44, i5 ier-9 ' eL / /9-e'" 2 or.1. /a6-/• • Cc-7 qy d s- pvr)e ;h ; e o f 71/01 5-1 S/ `M DATE ff � -44 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 'CITY--.CIF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: I [ BLDG 1 PLNG ( ( P.W. PROJECT 4,07,v,„1 %%9, L0CATI0N /4 2 i1 '- z(rt,tJ DATE TRANSMITTED 6/.va1 y STAFF COORDINATOR At) Q ifii4J 11 �N FU -2za EPIC 2,38 AI FILE FIRE VA- POLICE P & R FILE NO.G- �,�CJ -�y RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (AV /jfiG� RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM CO ENT ac osEh Only S-rfLOCT IOA) (,JILL 1-1A YE A. v -S19aysF�CAnuT m ?Ae'i oN 91 VFau 1412.E4S • DATE , , aS g y COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA F rn Lftl 0 L _I ftl[tii ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM F _..__...,� ..- _..._w... 2 1 1984 ciTY OF TUKI ALA This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the a Xj -j Taal permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to-be completed. A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the'Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 1-1r.1,60AL_ C vauct to 1 . 2. Address and Phone Number.of Proponent: ‘534,..0 L. -i- sa a Te. D, \n.. 9B05(Q 3. Date Checklist Submitted: v �r Z) 1c18 4 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: �ul k-VA 7 �,�e.:r r-kaw..11- 5. Name of Proposal , if applicable: 1:5,13sel, jvkpck, I■1Ac..k‘,..k Co. 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size,• general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate.understanding of its scope and nature): Ivr�t- t� \Vr us, F\G T..) L..01K.SC 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): ous-r-iz 1 oa.L b3"Ll�; ) x1ST1I. AS�4 �,T U 1Te. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: - 56- 84 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO )( (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO ". (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (i) Curb cut permit YES NO s (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related•to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yl /&`r" {CTV 2r Ti_ 'V14lS T5L xl . MA, ,2:-NDn a ep 11. Do you.know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO • • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes . in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable. natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited ' to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) -Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15 Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) .Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result- in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • • YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical.* Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. (r) Fc 21 . ) 915 47 Signature and Title V,P. Date . 7:1w4_e>•�'_:d :.. 4.._ :_.I2'.3.. i2' -3" i4' ci" p. 34cno' ::PFIOJBCT, FO -R +", I•. ,.' OsdCMgAML CO N NSTRUCTIO INC: 93020 LAKE. KATFILEEN _.ROAD . 9. E RENT,ON� ..WAb 4INOTON ®9088 �; r - -,' s.� �� . 1 1-r. LIp ::: 11 f p d 0 <r I. m I n 1.< -n r 4 ?03 -a %nmap L� -I M OP I,? $fi •cm “pit: 4,5 5 -J n ( 1' rn �r,c1 a U: m z + cn vm� . N • n • oil_ . r o ;.�roa„ rn_n ' Dpi .n" .b{1� uzo, i r m Eio� (. -1 �a-p A.. -ILL : bm a zx ' ¶lip �m n. tar IQ (Ala Sd K`.Nara r 01 ip.. i3: 4Ro 1Dc L Ap Z0. A {Ai. nrtla �vw A v : 0 m- 0,01 1 .And -_ 1p A Z 0' �e �a z n a Z ui Irk , r • r ( , 'r 0 001A0"11, Ni m=mZIP1,11 Y -,Apm��aii`^ .AOII I iiq .�� • dym;lmNlpmr: _r -i Z • arflp �• 1 -L OL{ = x�� • I fit, "Mr POI • } • 14,N- � @ A • t• p m •Kl. r .N p" 9m. K, P ".6-n .{ m c ' Di.: � " pF. d . � 4UF:: Am`�.1 PROJECT VOA: F, C >V-E l23 MFGi. i MJ5G+iINS Gc ? 13C2S2 11�1T�t2lll�t�/S I_1 l�VGt TU Imo, \V I L h. , \V4.- M ETAL BUILDING DIVISION • OOCHNAHL CONSTALICTION INC: 13020 LAKE KATHLEEN RQA14 ;14 xE RENTON, WASHINGTON S2O82• •