Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-24-88 - BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS - MOBIL OIL UNDERGROUND TANKMOBIL OIL STATION N0. 10 -M32 UNDERGROUND TANK REPLACEMENT 13310 INTERURBAN AVE. S. EPIC 24 -88 Christine Gregoire >(PrX€AtPfxx Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • '(206) 459 -6000 September 14, 1988 Mr. Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila Planning 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: �� L tin I�i, , ir' ; ;,1) k. SEP 16 1988 1 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the installation of new fuel tanks for the Mobil Oil Company (file EPIC- 24 -88). We reviewed the en- vironmental checklist and have the following comments. 1. Notification regarding newly installed tanks must be pro- vided to the Department of Ecology on a state notification form within 30 days of being put into service. The notifica- tion form can be obtained by calling Jean Witt at 1-800-826-7716. 2. Removal of underground tanks should be accompanied by a soil test for contamination in accordance with Department of Ecology procedures. If contamination above Ecology's cleanup levels is encountered, please notify Ecology immediately. The contact persons are Lynn Cashion or Gail Colburn at (206) 867 -7000. DJB: cc: Marlene Wylie, NWRO Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section 3 WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS FROM FUNCTIONING MOBIL OIL SERVICE STATION AND INSTALL NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS AND PRODUCT PIPING. Proponent BUSH, ROED & HUTCHINGS. INC- (FOR MOBIL OIL COMPANY) Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 13310 INTERURBAN AVENUE S. TUKWILA, WA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -24 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [l There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. 'Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address Dat Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tu,,�f! WA, g8 88 Signatur You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS TO DOE AND VALLEY DAILY NEWS (FOR PUBLICATION MONDAY, 9/5/88) 'CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM • CN EPIC -24 -88 FILE TO: 0 BLDG PLNG P.W, n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT "Mobil" Underground Tank LOCATION 13310 Interurban Avenue, South; Tukwila DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Rebecca Fox FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE f:c! COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 - -'�'CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG [j PLNG 1 ( P.W. PROJECT "Mobil" Underground Tank EPIC -24 -88 FILE FIRE [ 1 POLICE n P & R LOCATION 13310 Interurban Avenue, South; Tukwila DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Rebecca Fox FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT are- i4 o—katu i ,/en U. DATE 5" /a / COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN EPIC -24 -88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG 0 PLNG n P.W. f[ FIRE (l POLICE P & R PROJECT "Mobil" Underground Tank LOCATION 13310 Interurban Avenue, South; Tukwila FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Rebecca Fox RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE r7 . ,i2r COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ["BLDG PLNG I ( P.W. Er FIRE PROJECT "Mobil" Underground Tank • CN EPIC -24 -88 FILE POLICE n P & R LOCATION 13310 Interurban Avenue, South; Tukwila DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Rebecca Fox FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8-10 -88 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 7/9/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 C TY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC -24 -88 FILE TO: [( BLDG PLNG El P.W. [ FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT "Mobil" Underground Tank LOCATION 13310 Interurban Avenue, South; Tukwila DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Rebecca Fox FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Con* li No. Epic rile No. E; fL - z s -Ge Fee $100.00 Receipt No.43Q!ir Mobil Oil Station No. 10 -M32 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: "Underground Tank Replacement" 2. Name of applicant: Bush, Roed & Hi hinges, roc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle. WA_98102. (206) 323 -4144a Contact_:' James. V. Harrison 4. Date checklist prepared: July 8, 1988 5. Agency requesting Checklis City of Tukwila '6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will begin approximately 1 month after permit issuance and be completed - approximately 30 -60 days thereafter. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. i.Jo -2- JUL 281988 • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Permit,_ Underground Tank Removal Permit and Underground Tank Installation Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Subj.ecz` proper y Is_ an existing. functioning Mobil Oil service station. This _ proposal is .remove the existing underground fuel storage tanks and to install new underground fuel storage. tanks and product piping. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person .to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Site address: 13310 Interurban Avenue, Tukwila, WA Southeasterly intersection 48th Avenue S & Interurban Ave. 1111.1/13—Sections 14._& 15. Townsh t23 North Range 4 East W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Nn -3- TO `BE COMPLETED BY APPLIr. 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth di Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other fully developed b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 4% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Puyallup, fine sandy loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Proposal is to remove 26.000 accumulative gallons of storage _and to install 34,000 accumulative gallons of storage. Volume differential is 8,000 gallons or 40 cu.yd. (export) f.- Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Excavation will be surrounded by existing asphalt. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Site disposition will remain as is. 41' 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: standard erosion rnntrn1 methndc will hi. PlnyPd throughout construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust. heavy equipment emissions, etc.. The con- struction will be performed with standard equip - ment. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Now rnnctriirtinn will include the installation of stage one vapor recovery (vapor recovery during delivery of product from tanker trucks) 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes site is approximately 1/4 mile northwest of Duwamish River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 410, 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Site runoff will remain as is. Proposal will not affPrt Site runoff_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nnna_ c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NnnP . Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A - Proposal is to install storage tanks only. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Fuel spill could occur. Resulting fire could occur. 1) Describe special° emergency services that might be required. Fire. aid and police services_ 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: state o h art delivery dnd dispensing apparatus make the possibility of spills and fires remote_ Fiber- .114 a Os e• in minimizing fuel leaks. -10- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction activities will be restricted to normal business hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: Mobil oil Seryire Station North: Texaco service station South: Freeway (I -5) East: Denny's Restaurant West: Freewy(I -5) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Service bay facility and canopy covered pump islands. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M_1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Same g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Same as at pmegept_ j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? TankG will bP aii1i ground Vents will be 12'0" high b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Nn c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nnnp_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and . glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course 1/2 mile southeast of property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site fronts on 48th Avenue South & TntPrurhan Avenue. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YP4 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Existing parking will not be impacted by t 3 s proposal. None will be added or e1_imin.atesta._ • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Nnna 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N- p . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utilities will remajn as is. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them tmake its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIA, D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: 1 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Ooes the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLT".• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To %QL-r c Qc -4- tic, c'c-O iz- - 6,0 -OJr∎ - STort-e- Cd-=- T730K Uc) GU2(1-0■1 t owb 6)4 -EIL S> Fu ALT Si off ` j�,J S PA,-.) c_ R:11= CT'r S. TAN4S ° 1 -s/5k1L c 'I MJ ut (k3 GP--_'-( DE 2'S -rc3 3 ro.) 0) 3 , 1 r M��� TLr�7aJc.` OAT S 4� IS TI ✓IBC. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? TI�i= Tom' JtaZc =S gl-c In o OF ATO L...G/a j2 - r u N 7 ( (tot-) to6 .L '� (-1 c -Goes, . . Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: to Rt.( (IA- , a LC- 0c 114-el ©u3 Tb TOZ Co ti l o ..) 1 Tdl rJ Tea -vnS g1ctey -- % J e- L3.31/41 ((z- k , ?2G - �' =Yz� =� COL) (LSc t LT- TtAL - J t R -O►,DrA -r 172oPo 5c:'c a PQL - )LDJ TYT 'C v-' t • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- •eu.0 To./. VC. T u,E.. To 4..1E .00l.T1o.a Wl2M C5'1.LLW.t CILCGT! v.l. DY %/0011.. OM. 00*0.. •,v.0 CYO:.YEt. JUL 28 1988 11' 1Mt 171 .., +z. T. SIG 0. r. rco1 p;. ,-sd..... CO.JSTSUCT n• 'MOCK. R...Fa.Ct0 C0.1CtGTE QLM.E> B R•ac.,OOm YMYO G.oO•CT O I1Yp CO.QIMt(1T21.0 48th AVENUE S. AVENUE S. INTERURBAN VICINITY MAP MDSEL Ott et.. 010.4110 TOWEL, 11•StliTS0 IwYURRa:u® /mis ig m m 0.011 u a (»i1.W Ml .1 .ti am• 11100104 1100.0.•11]. ms20•-03114 .2 LIESTOYTEOM Y4 • Y.f .2 WAY V Y •.p•, i, vv ••rt1R1...f 0m1•o Y ALLOW. SlyorlY •T 001..1. 11 ST MOM v DT • CM Tat CTSTIatt. •T TIM PLY 12T Y. YSTILLI CO.. TO TVS IMMIMMTYYT CRY/ OS .1.11 1■60.■ "'"1" Mobil Oil Corporation .. WO. r..i c1c OM unw 120.714117 .a ...Y. 4u•0•.1• m1 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 13310 INTERURBAN AVE. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON �.. ••_ 10 M32 • —.