Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA EPIC-243-84 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PARKS AND RECREATION - FOSTER GOLF COURSE FILL
FOSTER GOLF COURSE LANDFILL EPIC - 243 -84 �._MA7NL1A/E P•QOPOSBO 0'AZ. ./ �VI.� '� - -SCE ✓. /7. /o \ L= re�/FCCCEC : ro uc carE BJVC.G LGU/ C A. i.;C M1 �6 //i�ra7 93.!• -0.�5- 228_Gn ,r,-a.Jo /v • INov • G 19841 CITYCF.�4.i:'..�'{ PLAMMING CPi.'•. • W/ Z. G / Ago Assdi .TES Ai\ 25 C A %E 4,./0 G-OGF CoU c / /TAGT� 7802 S /MC,(V0,S, .7.0AC3' iclE. f!/R-st)//AlGre, / 488.8200 "98ai/ CslC��t -�P� CeiyFi.� REvf .. htar /o gp '-:1 : fr4;f6*a I.4n .4OaG :-9 ... /4__ r _ Ax? rriLT :if!,ViNG..OS/.�.e.:. «6Ei6O ,G`e,c7st./cEO cars ` II 1111 :, I : i I; . . it%Ti�d7LL -ED ' • u,s SSL/.CIS•'.TZENTCGy • • { . 5EC7io v i{If° iiffl .J �__:.J berz.r. ✓ceT'_�a�G� l' >_5: -0"'. _... _ -_ T--- - inaml11 111111 II /OIIRfl111uU111trs ....—.._ ■ '' 111 11111111N1111H11111MIIIB1111f111D :11111 e1� 1 umpulaul 110111N1111111�lI I IIIIIIInn■ ■......� ,z/v/.. e':Acc.ss : vp Mi VL 1111011 1IIIi1U1111p111111111Nn111 "' ■ ®�'' ! I. 1141eryr ill llllilR lN101tlllf1i111tlltlnlna,u.■. r � oae,eo e 0/0.9..C.7 70/..4 -lei- �/Fl�G'4'^t ✓E.G-. St /�G/�Y /•a ff>_ :: __ -.:. /.e.,/CO.WEK :::AB�Ft!e�rt/ SIAPt+SE ..: ;;/ ?"ac. v. : rralmr>augnoul LAND ?i�E •',4/� GOLF : /p f{56Z2C:4A7 -E5.:. • Coc/,esG,2.797-G77 S . .:"..G. - -- - - /L1,4/%TEl�/S/ E .. _CUIK�L�� _ - - - . � _ ..; . .E� .. .. —4 L _ -31 - / &;,V,S?/uL71G3�1: - ,Qa� � ,a e¢ rill ' loe/ /O�GE- _ `�✓�'G7- __ - 4-e-ever., AIA5, 6C6 A./•,•0,e3 . - ii -........., ....-- ----- _. ___..„ .., , i oil, • :,.., it„,e ....._....... \ _....' ' -' - . sitirs, V7Fills-41:•-• ...e."„;;.' •,:;—/A■ • - ' -*" ..,,A -. ----.....- 4-...‘", iitilr(4:' \V ' -- 11,..:0141W-etillk 'W-4 , cm,,27.11 ira.7r••=1.7•11■2_.- 11.434764.1r- . • 'Alt.! /....yi mg% ■• ..,.."A 4htlik740/10. -------"--- ,„ . ..... NI., -5-70.- - feca.....a ,.;" ----.. - 4,./* . . 1 If k "0 . ' • , ------.--- --- --......,,,, , r • :7- , • -7- - -7 k yeNt, u• Pr ..71/1/./ . iliFOZ..---,±=VTD:- _ 2.AeV4 • - 7 - .41-..;=Vitl::-_7"ic-/-."..2Vi./C—E—_--.71)1.1•;..°,4--EX.T.--CTZ_Z",...g..-_. . -...7-. z /Ae&-.,f --. • , -772__ .",4:,,,z_ -: .."•/a. -..*_-:_ - J___—_.-_.77Z/_/.<_Fs:e14- A . .. _ - -- ., -- NOTICE OF ACTION Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that City of Tukwila took the action described below on November 16 , 1984. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action the grounds of non - compliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before T,March 13. 1985. Description of agency action: approved building permit. Description of proposal: landfill of 3700 cubic yards. Location of proposal: south side of Foster Golf Links golf course.. Type of environmental review under SEPA: Final Determination of Non - Significance. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the Planning Department, City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Name of agency, proponent, or applicant giving notice: City of Tukwila This notice is filed by: Rick Beeler, Associate Planner Date L c z . s m z 4( t`e64' Published: Record Chronicle, December 6, 1984 & December 13, 1984 cc: Applicant City Clerk Mayor Departisent of Ecology File WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Landfill pre -load of 7,000 cubic yards on the Foster Golf Course Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any south side of Foster Golf Course and east of Interurban Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - .243 -84 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. LX[ There is no comment period for this DNS LJ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date )(- Signature €3'1-6. -g C CQL.., You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO I I BLDG PLNG I I P.W. FIRE • CN EPIC - FILE POLICE I P & R PROJECT Lary )(_. oscic..kv - 2N5 C.aaF. claavv E. . LOCATION tFAILWer SUf)E: ef= ( MQm2+S�c FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 112"48+ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Askto STAFF COORDINATOR. L RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT • DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ORICE MEMO • CITY OF TUKWILA TO :c ,243_ 84 FROM: (� , DATE: 1118184 SUBJECT: IIVENICIAD It . S `W (KT-0 V` PA`c, '' C PJOItiSU fi t I■iCk me MOD, NIL • Subject OIL _.1 From • • Speed Message tat CC_ ■ c. -3 --04- 198 yeLy_ (AA Op 1(12484' KE C..._ PiVvrcss IS DM I Ara.. .. PLectO Date tAke.Pri t € . Signed INilsonJones GRAYLINE FORM 44 -900 2 -PART C.1983 • PRINTED IN U.S.A. Cit of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 • 11M Gary L VanDusen, Mayor NOV G 1984 CITY OF TU WI_A PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM TO: Byron G. Sneva, Public Works Director, FROM: Phillip Fraser, Senior Engineer DATE: 11/2/84 SUBJECT: Tukwila Maintenance Complex at Foster Golf Course 7 Structural Fill I' N Cascade Testing Laboratories has transmitted their Preliminary Soils Report (10/18/84 - Cert. No. 8410 -63G) for the subject project. This report includes their findings and recommendations for the placement of structural fill at the South End of Foster Golf Gourse to-meet the requirements of a roadway parking facility�arid- building:structure. This report recommends the borrow source supplied by Cascade Exvators, Inc. which is located at the Railroad tracts in Renton, as suitable for a foundation material for the City's proposed use. The alternate borrow source at Sea -Tac Airport was rejected for this specific application. Mr. Iddings of Cascade Excavators, Inc. has indicated) this material is still avialable (between 1.,500 C.Y. and 3,300 C.Y.). On 10/29/84 I unsealed his bid (attached). Under his proposed Alternate Bid, Cascade Excavators, Inc. will provide up to -3,300 cubic yards, at $4.39 /CY.per the conditions of Cascade Testing Laboratories as modified per the following: A. Grade and compact to 90 %+ in 6" to 8" lifts in the manner described in Cascade Testing Report B. Material to be provided within 90 calendar days of notice to proceed C. Material will be provided in dry weather conditions only. D. Material to be placed as directed by City staff Considering this material will set for over six months, I believe it will consolidate to the 95% required compaction by the time the structure is design and ready to be placed on the fill. Therefore, I recommend the City proceed with the Alternate bid through Cascade Excavators, Inc. for the Phase 1 fill for the project. Next year, when an additional budget is appropriated, Phase II of the structural fill will complete the foundation portion of the project. This scope of work does not include scarafying the surface nor removing any top soil. During prior excavations of the soil, I noted that the top soil layer /organic material to be under 4" in depth. This depth of organic material is under the 6" of organic material allowed to be left Page 2 in place, under strucutral fill per the Cascade Laboratory Report. Removal of the overburden material at the south end of the fill site may be requi.redkand should be carried out as part of the Phase II structual fill scope of work. Per my discussion with Don Williams, the Budget Line Item for the Maintenance Complex Phase I, to be encumbered is #101.575.600.65.01. Requested is auth <rization to proceed with this Project. Attached is PO #17596 for execution along with an Encumberance Notice. The Contractor will provide a Performance Bond and Cirtificate of Insurance as part of his application for a Hauling Permit /Fill Permit associated with this project. Additional conditions the Contractor has agreed to in carrying out this scope of work are as follows: A. Erosion Control Measures will be taken as part of this work, including desiltation ponds /filter fabric and ditching provided, as required, during construction. - 8. Dust Control: Water truck will be provided if dust becomes a problem. C. Duration of Fill: Fill will be provided over the next 90 calendar days during dry weather conditions. D. Traffic Control: Flagging will be provided when the Contractor exceeds use of over 4 trucks onto S.R -181 and local roads (Haul Route handled as part of Hauling Permit). Contractor will utilize existing access road adjacent to Maule Ave R/W on Puget Power R/M now' available for City /County access road. Attachments (4) y- R1b o"1 X10 • Public Works ENCUMBRANCE NOTICE Dated BUDGET LINE ITEMS- # a /ray PROJECT NUMBER .I , Sacker • (05- 0? VENDOR.NAME ,.E . Ex /fib 1-S • DATE SUBMITTED TO FINANCE DEARTMENT CONTRACT' • :HANGS ORDER N URCHASE ORDER- I %Sc HECK-ED BY Engineering .I vision Project Manager DPROVED BY Public Works Director ......... ............................... . .... ..... .......... .::..............,......; ..; ...:::.... ............. ............................... ............................................ ............................ • ....................................... .............................. CAMWDE EXCAVATORS INCORPORA• 24814 - 238 Place S.E. MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 September 14, 1984 City of Tukwila Public WorksDepartment TUKWILA, WA Attention: Phil Frazier or Sally Heye To Whom It May Concern: Quotation: Provide 3700 yards of compactible_ fill material at Foster Golf Course site Price - $14,500.00 Sales tax (if any) not included Material Source - City of Renton railroad bed Delivery - Before September 30, 1984 Truck and trailer - bellydump Yardage - Truck measure by cubic yard Grading - Dozer spread to owner's grade Bonding available if necessary Alternate Provide 3300 cubic yards of same fill, grade and compact to 9070 plus Price - $14,500.00 Yours truly, 44ZA=e Nancy C stello Office Manager Burroughs • PURCHASE ORDER No. 017596 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98188 • 433-1836 Cascade Excavators, Inc. 24814 - 238th Place SE Maple Valley, WA 98033 THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL PACKAGES, PAPERS AND CORRESPONDENCE, 11/1/84 DATE Q CONFIRM ORDER - ONLY ORDER Q SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS SHIP TO DEPT. TUKWILA, WASH. STREET ADDRESS QUANTITY: DESCRIPTION? BUDGET. CLEARANCE CODE -- PRICE1. TOTAL: Structural FiI1rat South E nd_of Foster Golf Course at':$4.39 /CY to `a limit of $14,500. Conditions by which this work to be carried: out as provided in_1 /2 /_84_memo_by_ThiL raser Uttached) —up to' $14,500= CASCADE TE TING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126+« PLACE KIRKLANO, WASI4.4GTON 0603A October 18, 1984 Cert. No. 8410 -63G (2061623.0600 SEATTLE (2061525 -6700 EVERETT 12061259.0617 City of Tukwila Department of Public Works 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer Reference: Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility Foster Golf Course Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Fraser, Please find enclosed the test results for the (10) ten soil sam- ples delivered to our laboratory on September 28 and 29, 1984. PRELIMINARY Based on the laboratory data and telephone discussions with you, we will submit recommendations pertaining to the construction of the proposed Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility. We reiterate that these recommendations are based on the preliminary 'lab results alone and therefore we strongly recommend further sub- surface investigation of the site by our firm to assure that these recommendations are adequate and correct prior to construction of your buildings. It is our understanding that the proposed structure will be a single story slab on grade metal framed building with floor loads of 250 p.s.f. It is further understood that the site will be brought up to building grade with the addition of (4) four to (6) six feet of fill. October 18, 1984 Cert. No. 8410 -63G City of Tukwila Page 2 • OASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS Based on test results and the type of construction proposed, we make the following recommendations; Site Preparation All vegetation and surficial rubble should be removed prior to fill placement. This should include any bush, rubble, building material or substance that may deteriorate over time. Thin layers of topsoil may be left in place and filled over. Heavily organic topsoil with thicknesses greater than six (6) inches should be removed prior to the fill placement. Fill Placement We recommend that fill placement start place during periods of dry weather due-to the moisture sensitive natural soils present at the site. Once a good fill base is established the prevalent weather conditions will dictate the quality of fill suitable for your pro- ject. We recommend utilizing a select class A or class B gravel backfill for .foundations meeting Washington State Standard Specification 1984, 9- 03.12(1) A or B, the fill should be placed in (6) six to (8) eight inch loose lifts and compacted to 95% of the ASTM D -1557 mois- ture density relationship test for soils. Combined samples 4, 5 and 6 (see enclosed sieves), were found to meet the recommended class A or class B specification for backfill. The combined samples 7, 8 and 9 did not conform to either class A or class B, gravel backfill for foundations. Therefore, we recommend that the backfill for this site be the combined sample 4, 5 and 6. Should another borrow site, other than the above two be chosen, we suggest performing a full October 18, 1984 Cert. No. 8410 -63G City of Tukwila Page 3 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS sieve analysis prior to placing the new material on the site to determine its suitability as backfill. Wet weather conditions should dictate a clean granular fill, while dry weather allows the placement of a material containing more fines ( -200 sieve material). However, by utilizing a material with more fines, wet weather may slow the progress of filling due to longer draining and /or..drying times required prior to continuing the fill process. We would further recommend that an engineering geologist be present to observe fill placement within the building site and check compac- tion of the fill. Foundation Design For footings placed within the suitably compacted structural fill, we recommend a maximum soil bearing value of 2000 psf. All footings should be a minimum of (16) sixteen inches wide and excavated at leas (18) eighteen inches below the exterior adjacent grade for frost protection. Footings shall bear on a minimum depth of (2) two feet, of structural fill. Slab on Grade We recommend that a minimum (4) four inch blanket of free draining granular material having less than (3) three percent minus 200 sieve size material be placed under the slab to provide a capillary break. • • October 18, 1984. Cert. No. 8410 -63G City of Tukwila Page 4 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION /ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS This material should be lightly compacted to provide uniform slab support, but we suggest that excessive compaction be avoided to prevent destroying the free draining character of the blanket. Further recommendations may be proposed following additional site investigations by our firm. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Tukwila for specific application to the proposed Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility located at the Foster Golf Course in Tukwila, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soil and founda- tion engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or impli- ed, is made. We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. Charles C. May, P.E. Vice President ;4r Rosalind M. Liston !A" Geologist RML : cmm APPENDIX A LABORATORY DATA CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING C INSPECTION - . ENGINEERS 14120 N.E. 21st STREET BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98007 Cert. No: 849 -8o Project: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE STORAGE FACILITY SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Boring Number Sample Depth Std. Pen. Resistance Soil Class. ASTM 02487 A er•erg Limits Ii 2 �� C (Lbs /ft2) u (Lbs /ft2) 7' PCF Sample Type LL PL PI (R) I 1.5' M 26 26 0 18% 40OIbs/A3 • 2 3' CL - ML 35 28 7 33% 3 G' -7' CL 44 28 16 42% 4 5 6 1.5;3,5 =6' SM - - 7 8 9 l'-3' S M - - - - SHELBY '2.5'- 3.5' ML - — - 40.2% TUBE • • 0 Z 0 • ~ .30 0 p .35 Z 0 .40 0 .05 . 10 . 15 .20 .25 CONSOLATION TEST D TA • .45 .50 .55 1.0 01 PRESSURE (tsf) 1.0 10.0 kEY BORING DEPTH USC SOIL DESCRIPTJON LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT MOISTURE BEFORE AFTER DRY DENSIT SHELBY SILT, GRAY BROWN IN COLOR, TUBE 2.5 =3.5' ML WITH MINOR ORGANICS. SAMPLE 3 ?.1 % 33.9% 93.2 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 14120 N E. 21.c STREET 6ELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98007 EVERETT . (2061 64 1-2573 (2061259-0817 CERT, No 849-80 PAGE �� „� CASCADE - r E T1lVG LA ©ORATORY. I . TESTING & INSPECTION /tNC,iINE ERS /GEOLOGISTS L 12919 N.E. 126,.. PLACE: KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 90033 12061023.9000 SEATTLE 12091925-6700 EVERETT 12061 259-0917 100 90 60 '70 O W eo m cc so I- Z W 40 W 30 20 IO 0 SIEVE ANALYSIS 511C OF OPENINQ IN INCH &S r _ r NVUDER QF ME5H PER INCH. US. STANDARD R 2 7 2$ 2$ SIEVE ANALYSIS %PASS SPECS 100 99 I1 I 1 COBBLES SAMPLE NO. 7 8 9 Cogs• DEPTH N 1r 3' GRAVEL FT 11 _I _ 1 O 0 0 GRAIN SIZ[ Fin• 11 T1 r "I ^' • — It "I N 2.5% MIN. 10 MAX. IN MILLIMETERS - ,CORPS OF CNOINS[R3 UNIFORM SOIL CLASSIFICATION Coarse CLASSIFICATION Medium THAT MI C SAND LL P S. 192. S +.,2.8Av6.S S. 192. st. , 28 Ave•S Fine MATERIAL COMf,1 NGD 1, s, g PROJECT VEHICLE MIINTENANC 6 STORAGE FACILITY (CITY ot= TUKWILA) S. 194 St -, 2CSAvE.8 CllocksT CERT. NO. 10 -5 -84- I—, Abo,• of r•potJr,c7 1 •n c� .•nt 100 90 60 70 O Ui 00 m 4- #' ,L_ UJL I t_%, I INJ( LAOORATORY. INit: TESTING IA INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 12G+.. PLACE KIHKL AND. WA5HINGTON 90033 SIEVE 312 OF OPENING IN INCH(S PI 12061823.9000 ANALYSIS SEATTLE CVERCTT 42061 925.6700 12061 250.00 17 NVMQER QF ME 3H PER INCH US.0TANDARO _ nd N Z 50 L z W 40 CC w n 30 20 I 11:1 2► 9;2 93 ?�. 93 ■ ■ s 1 i #50 : Ii #80 5 4(00 4. �■ 4200 2.8 0 SPECS G3 36 25% MIN. 32. 2G 20 f IO 0 I 1 1 1,I _ 1 8 2 32$ $ as COBBLES III] 1, l I _ 0 0 .o m r 1 1 1 1- f l _I 1- I -- _ ^I N • - Q 0 h + "1. W GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CORPS OF ENGINEERS UNIFORM SOIL CLASSIFICATION Co•rs• I Fin• GRAVEL SAMPLE NQ DEPTH - FT. 4 5 C Coarse I Medium SAND Fin• MATERIAL COMBINED SAMPLE 4, 5, CLASSIFICATION 1.5 RR BERM N. E n1D 3.0 RR B PJ1 N.END 5 —C RR BERM MEND NAT 1K C. L L P PROJECTVEHICL.E MAINTENA(VCE STTRA GE FAQ LI Ty (C11.`( OF TL/KWILA) CERT. NO. 845-80 `Pl.n.d:ESPT 10 -4 -84 a.a.e: (Dell of r•e•rt) CA•CAd. TenTINo T..TINO ! (Nora� 14120 k f 71st Sr lfll(Yl/f WASH SIX) LA.ORATORY. INC. 7N •• ENGINEER. Boring No. Run No. Tore No. LIQU AND PLASTIC LIMIT TESTS � SRI- Dote OC 5 R4 cEac� $ O Project VEHicLE MAINTENiNC64 SToRAc�E F< Sample No. I N 1.5' LIQUID LIMIT 2 3 s rn 3 Tore plus wet soil 20.95 4 Tare plus dry soil 16.68 Water Tore I ww r 4.27 .50 Dry soil Water content w 16.18 2G°� 0 • Number of blows 4 C C 8 d 0 26 SS . .......1111........MIMMI ■11■ ■11■ ■11.■ E— N —a_._. _E.....■.■■■....■.■.■ MIIIIMENISSSSIIIMSS ■INIMMI..MI....SS...■ ■■ ■11■■■■■■. ■11 MN IMMO MB IMI11111111 �IMMINI=MIMI∎MMMI111111......... ■ ■ ■ ■ MUMS MID ■. MIME= MIMM MEMOS IMO SIB MEI .....M.■...■■■ ■■... moms MM1111111111111111111MIIIM IMEM NMI SS....■ NMI ■11 ■■ ■ MIS 11Egli SSSS.1SS�.. NOM MIN 1111111. ■.■ MI■.■..SS..SSSS. SS■ ■■. ■.....■..■ �■:_ - - - - -- - --e,no Moo _.._....a.... a...■ MIMI= 1•1•111•1111111 111111111111111111111111111•11133 �� -- 1111— ...............mow ini... 111•11111111111111111111■M 111E1111111111•1111111 SSE■■• NM MI ■.M.SS.MIMISS. MIMEO ■ ■■■■ BIM .. MEM IBM MI .. UMW= MUMS MIMEO ■■■■■ Imo ow= mow I= MIOMMIONIBM SIMINBOM =MUM =MUM mom 1101111111111MIMMIIMMIMMIBMIISSMI.MI.....a MEMO •aa.1111■ ■■■ �E.•EEM .E ■IMIIMSS■MM Mme... =MINIM .■■■■ 1111■■■ 1111■.. ■.•E.•IMM MIME =NI��.1 E.•�..........■■..■........ INIMIMMINIM■EIMINENNIONIIINN..........■■■■■■NO11■■■. SS. E1111111■.•.11111E111111..1...■..SS...... ■.■. ■■.■...... E■■IMI=E = Inn E■.MI.11•3MI.....SS..■N ■■ ■...■■ ■.■ IOW E111111111=1111■MEMMINII ■IIIM...........n ■ 1111......■ �. � .•1111■1.SSIMIIISS.ME1■............1111M■ IIIIII. MEN SSSSSISS_ INEMINISS ■UNISS.MMIMI.SS...SS.SS ■■ ■■■■■■.OEM ..1■11■11E.tIMMI■.1 ∎M......SS..■ ■1111■ ■■ ■■■■■.■ SSE■ INIMIEMI...EIIIII En MIM....................■n NMI 1111111111111ME t•..•111•1111•1111111MIMISS...SS..■■.■■■.■■■■■.■ OMNI .� E�.�E�■�E� E11•1111..........■■■■ ■.....■■■. SSSSIMI�SS��SS ■0•SS.NIMMI.SS .MISS..■■..■■■■.■■■.■ "�SS■SS.�l�..SS�....SS■■ ■. MIMEO ■...■ MEI SSEMSSSSI MINM SS ■�.....SSSS�. MEMO ■■■■11.■■.■ 5 Number of blows 10 20 30 40 LL 26 PL 26 PI 0 Symbol from plasticity chart M Nog-PLASTIC SILT Run No. • PLASTIC LIMIT 2 3 4 5 Natural Water Content ei • t in gram Tore No. Tare plus wet soil - Tare plus dry soil Water Tore • 2.88 2.36 .52 Dry soil Water Content Plastic limit w .30 2.0G 26 2.74 2.2.6 .49 .35 2.66 2.17 • .49 1.90 2G .23 1.88 26 2G AVE. Remarks Technician Computed by Checked by CA•CAd. TReTINO T..TINO & IN.�.CYI 14120 HI 21:r ST. Stilt VIII WASH SIX/ Boring No. MOM^TORY, INC. ■ *NO1N•.A■ LIQUID•D Date OCT. I Project VEHICLE Sample No. 2 PLASTIC LIMIT TESTS p GG11 1384 C T.►so.84J -OO O MAINTENANCE -STORAGE FAG( 3' Run No. Tare No. LIQUID LIMIT 2 Tare plus wet soil 0 rn Tare plus dry soil s • Water Tare Dry soil Water content Number of blows L� 1.52 13.1 0 4.42. .42 6 s 12.68 35% 25 - -_-- -- ----- - - - - -- .._... a•a•a••- 1111•- •.••-- •- -...•. C■■.. ■......■■ a■ - a�����tea ........ ■�■ ■■ ■■■■■.■■ ■■■ mmo am ma - - - -NIII- 1111- a............. a.a.ae• ••.�a..�.- ate•.----.-.--.. ■ ■...•...m.. --•. =a■• _•.••a■_•............11■ ■ ■••11••• a..• •.. ••.111111 ■ ■ ■■ ■■1111.■■ •a■�•■• a..•..•.•.•.•.a.•....•...11■.■1111 ■..•.11■■ �mom ■isiiiimmwomMimimmININIIIIImimm111111•111111mi NM NMI 111111111•1•111111111111•1111111111= =MUM MINIMS MUNI WAN •>, ��� •.���•■.......■. ■ ■■ ■■■■■■•■■■■ ■.- a■.••..- a.111M ..... ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.■o.■ •1111 -1111. - ---woe •1111. - - -• ----- ....... wow mow M• Mal.• __a.1•1111a..........11■■■I■■■••■•11■ -won - - -- 1111---- . =mom =ammo ■....■ ■ ■ ■. •11111•1111111111• • ••a.•.a1111111=.........■■■ IIMIN•1111■■ a•••■a■ a•..■a••.a• a∎a.•1113• 11111.•..-11..■.11■■■ ■1111■■ -- a•. a�••• .a-a�e•.e.........■.■...a■■■a■• -- -•.- -1111.. -- 1111. - -- -•. - -. -. _.......nun U. EMI •MI■...•...•l..•.11 ■1111111111.1111■■ a a.-•a.a..a�_a.a-____ •_■1111...• ■ ■ ■ ■••..I. ■1111.■■• a•�••... �� a�a.•...•a••r...■.■ 1111■ ■■•.a■■ •�••. ••.•MIIII••a.■• INIII•.....a••... ■■1111 ■■ ■11• ■■1111. •1111- win .•a.■. -ON11•.111111 •..a.. - -1111.-- .1111 ■ ■■.....11.... 11'EIN 1•1111111111111111111113 11111111=1.•......■ ■■■/1111■ •••11••• •�•EI•. • •-•..IMIIIIIIIIII•M•..•..•... ■. ■■• ■••• •EM ■•�••.••la.�•a ■•1•MIUw.•....■ ..•111.•.11•■ •�.•.��� �� -•1111 �- .....T........... •.•� ••.•■.■••.•• ••.•.•...M...11■■. ■.1111■ •11••11 .� MOB ■.IM•• -a -- •.1111■■. - -. ■•N -. -.. ■......1111... •■..• �MI•■.••. ..a- •..■•.•1111.•.. =MN ■.11■■M1111 1131•1111a>• aa>•a111111a.•.1= aka.•- •..•... ■■.■ ■ ■■ a.a■. M1111111■11•1111111111■ 111M111111•1•1•1.111•1• • a�■..■.■•.• ••.••.M11111••1•1....-.... ■11.■■■.■ ■■■. •.. .11111111111•11111111MIN MUM • =aEI••■.•••1111111Ca•a��■=•.......11■ ■111111 ■.••11•■■ 5 Number of blows 10 PLASTIC LIMIT 20 30 40 LL PL 28 PI Symbol from plasticity chart CL- ML CLAY Low ictry s%LT LOW PLASTIcr r' 35 1) C C C) Run No. Tare No. Tare plus wet soil '2.78 2 3.12 Tare plus dry soil Water Tare 2.26 .52 .46 2.58 .54 43 2.52 2.03 .49 .3G Dry soil Water Content Plastic limit w s 1.80 25 2.15 2.5 I.G7 23% 2.8% AvE. Natural Water Content Remarks Technician Computed by Checked by . C:A.cAd■ T..TIN. LA�OIIATOPIY, INC. LIQU�ND PLASTIC LIMIT TESTS TESTING l IN.P.�N .. iiNOIN..1I. 14110 N r 1,,r st. Dare 10— 4 - 84 CeRT. 140. 840-80 Of Ill VL/f. WASH SIO,I Project VEHICLE MAINTENANCE gTORAGE F C Boring No. : Sample No. 3 — 6'7' LIQUID LIMIT Run No. Tare No. 2 3 4 s C) V Tare plus wet soil Tare plus dry soil 15.75 11.05 Water Tare I ww Dry soil Water content (Ws w 4-.7 .45 10.G 44- Number of blows 26 -■-■---- - - - --- 1111.... IV= 01.11MMIBM MUM VOWS/ �.>•.N.■•.>•.>INNN NN....l.l... RUM MUMS BIM' �N•N.N Imalimm =MN wit N•.I1111- -IS- .. MINIM noun BRIM NNN.N. N..NM11N ................. �■.>•MNMI MINIM NMOM NN...- ........■.......... �M>•M>•M1 M>, NM1NN ••.I..IMBI•1.M.■■ ■ ■I.....SSW �.NI■NIMEN Mil NNNN■.v...■INI....■ ■1111■ ■11■11. ■.11■ �N•NNINMI N■— MINIM N NNNINI- ____. =MN ........Nam . Iwo mew mom MUM MI 0■�Min MNM,N■ MOM NNIN...IMMO. MM. ■.■MUMS MN NE MO mow Nowimme ■I =No moo MMM MMMMMMMIim maw mu le -- =11111N■NNN N1N.�. �.....■. ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■.■ ■■. �NN.N.- - -■■N• N.M.NINI..INI............. ■.... NNN.r.•NNNNM.•.E. M1.....11 ■11 ■11■ ■.111..■.. .>• M>•.1.=1NNNN.1.■....1......■..11■ ■1111■ ■ ■11■ �NN■NMIN M•MI•NN• NM■.M1..1... ■M11■ /■ /■■ ■11.11/11. NN.N.ism ----- N...ENV __.M._.... aim .mow N NNMI11111111111111N NN=1N11•111. .1.........11..■■MOM �N!l�.Ml M•N.NNN. N•.Ml. ■1N.M Mu ■uu uU.11.11.11■ �M�MNN MNN.1N.11 N•.MI. M1N.M.■■■/ ■■■■.../.■ OMB MEM MEIN INSEIBMIBMIBIBIIIIIIEBB• �..>•�NONNNNN•.MI.MIN.M.I■■■■■ ■.11...11. �NNN.N NNNM ■NM. NNM1M1. M1MI... M.N.........■.. �NN N. .N�N.INNN■.•.MI.NI.I..MM ■N■■ ■I■ ■11...11■ �MM>•NNMIN .■. ......■... NINN ■NNN�N•.NI.�M..MM■N�i ■■■■ IIIM �ON.N.NNNNN..•.Ml. ��.... ■ ■■.11■. ■..11.1111 �N■MNN.N MI,N•M•N• NMM.= IM.. ■.■■11■ 11.11.....11. MOM IMMIIN MINN NN•...111BMi..MM..■/ ■.■■11.11.1111 M■N �N .�M>•NM>•NNN.�N•...��..MM ■■■.■ ■11.11.11.11. NMI NNNMNN■NN•.MI.MIMI.. ■ MINIM NUM ....11. �..>•.NN.11>NNNN NN■1■I.�N.MItIBI1�t•11�•BIIi��S NEB 1111111.>••�NN•�UM■It.. ■.■■11■.N11asmos ANN ■N.N,N.N... NNIIM .1..1......NI........... 5 Number of blows 10 20 30 40 LL 44- PL 28 PI lCo Symbol from plasticity chart CL_ eI Run No. Tare No. PLASTIC LIMIT 2 3 4 Natural Water Content E 0 s 3 Tare plus wet soil Tare plus dry soil Water Tore Dry soil Iww w L 3.19 2.55 . 64 . 25 2. 3 3.20 2.58 . 62 . 33 2.2.5 Water Content Plastic limit w 28% 28% 28%AVE. Remarks Technician Computed by RML Checked by T /PVC C /NAP -cct. JN /ENr_:INc ciss /Gt UL00,sT_1 12919 N.E. 126/.. PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 99034 100 90 80 70 O 00 CO W 50 LL t- Z W 40 O. 30 20 10 1206/ 823-0800 SEATTLE 12001925.6700 EVERETT 12061 290.0817 SIEVE SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES i n N N — A wf \T ANALYSIS NVMBEZ_OF MESH PER INCH, U 5. STANDARD �s g 7 RS $$ 1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS O In Y uI Q 9 cf ci 0 0 GRAIN SIZg IN MM w ;i3°8 a C F 00 0 N 1_I.1 _ L I L S 2 S R 7 2 Co•rs• COBBLES GRAVEL I1 I I_ 0 O a I I I U In N — q 0h t PI N — 8 os a 4 4 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS --• CORPS OF ENGINEERS uNIFORM SOIL CLASSIFICATION F•n• Coarse I M•d1vm SAND FIn• 00 O FINES 10 20 30 50 60 70 90 100 R GIN r •AR R a wEl H SAMPLE NO. �k 1 DEPTH — FT CLASSIFICATION I4T WC. LL P 1 Ron.d• ESDT. Chocked: PROJECT FOSTER GOLF COURSE C.ERT. No. 849- 80 10 -4 -64 (Dat• of report) Ch... Solo Mech•n)c• 1Sr•nth • ♦-e_s rrrvc iot. /e_r Oir.L el- ets /e:sr_ot_c earsr_• 12919 N.E. 1261.1 PLACE KIR1(LANC1. WASHINGTON 9U034 . 1206) 023.9000 100 90 SIEVE SIZE or OPENING IN INCHES ANALYSIS. r n N . e0 0 W 3 w z I I- z W V W a 70 00 so 40 30 20 10 • SEATTLE 12061525.6700 E VERETT 12060 -250.06 17 Ny.MBE R OF MESH PER INCH. U. S. STANDARD to 0 1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS GRAIN 9 Z JN MM OH Q 0 UN It 0 N 0 0 0 O Nq q 0 0o O V • N O ■ ■i1i■�w wi■wi 1111! II _ II II 111111111111111111111 i I arnai - ii _ . liolliuml 1 Iiiiiiiii �iilii' iiiiii wlww■�■ 1111 ■■■■.■■ ■■�■■ 111111 _11111 ■„ 1111111111111111111 III � IIII ■a■■r■■■wl�w� ■■ : I:► c: t ► I 8 O o 0,00 ' 11 --- O o .on t to N — V O. .1 t ^1 N - O c O O 4 a O Q o O Q .D ao Y wow ■ ,ww .E11....-w w MIN 00 0 N C 10 20 30 U 40 > Q W •0 a 4 0 U 60 Z u Q 70 a. 8 2 SR g I COBBLES Coarse GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE IN MILLlMCTERS -• CORPS or ENGINEERS UNIFORM SOIL, CLASSIFICATION F.n• Co',. a I M•dium SAND F.n• FINES • SAMPLE NO. #2 DEPTH - FT. CLASSIFICATION NAT WC. LL P '1 Ron•e• E. S. D T. CI•.d.d• PROJECT FOSTER GOLF COURSE CERT. NO. 949 -80 10-9-84 - (Dat• of report) P • Ch _ Sol. •4ch•nlc. D• pnch • re 5l'IrVG H trvs4 cC I'IO/v /L'IsoVI#. i a IS T'J 12919 N.E. 12611+ PLACE K IRK LAND. WASHINGTON 98034 - 12061.923.9800 SEATTLE 12061 52 3.6700 EVERETT 12061250.0017 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 100 90 80 70 0 W 00 CO CC 30 Z W 40 0: 30 20 10 •4) , _ ,�� ° • �• HYDROMETER ANALYSIS MM NVM8ER OF MESH PER INCH, V. S.STANDARO 4 J goo I F F I- 00 N -I 2 S R g Xi Ill _I 1 1 I S O on t I'1 N - Q • h t II N I Y a GRAIN SIX Ig IN N ° O c o0 98 8 8 ` I I L L_ GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CORPS OF ENGINEERS UNIFORM '.E3 8 0 p 0 00 SOIL CL AS SOF ICATION i 8 C3 10 20 30 Z W 40 y mac 4'50 a- w a 0 U 60 Z U 0: w ►o i 60 30 Qq QR oQ10 0 V Y 8 N 8 8 8 COBBLES Co•rs• Fln• Co•r•• M•O7um Fln• GRAVEL SAND F I N ES SAMPLE NO. #3 DEPTH - Ft CLASSIFICATION NAT w C. LL P 1 Pl.nw E.S.DT Cheat& PROJECT FOSTER GOLF COURSE CERT. No, 849-80 10 -8 -84 (Oat• of r.port) h• Is Sel I M.cA•nic. Dr 4n0 4 •. • To 11-0L Subject From • • Speed Message c :) L 9LL -- C 243-64 Date rs—M. I, I6(84k 19 Kam` MI1 V. 1 - mes05 IXIN4111eMiQ SUM Cr: 3 . C_ C-00[ Z L wi tSVL S tP I-YN►'-/I (syzpiwu e.eA lb '(2.1k , ANN r- eN.N 12 N t sc oQs `ib i C_' Mme. Irk, `c " Signe WilsonJones GRAYLINE FORM 44 -900 2 -PART 01983• PRINTED IN U.S.A. CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; PROJECT BLDG PLNG k .14 A. MM.::, P.W. FIRE CN �IC 64- FILE Vet __• -ice _arrh-L POLICE P & R LOCATION SIWWF Stn- C .c e cslloL121;Q DATE TRANSMITTED —7i27:48+ STAFF COORDINATOR i';Qr..-. FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE.THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN. THE PLANNING DEPART -. MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH .CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 2, 1-Ye0 COST cc 3t(ZAL 3, DATE isem 1.t AsUie.SS ? 2? COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; BLDG PLNG PROJECT P.W. wit _ _ • FIRE • C N ¢,EPIC --.G1 FILE POLICE P & R Cyr . LOCATION <f�7 - stO c (j FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED -1i2:218+ RESPONSE REQUESTED BYATt° STAFF COORDINATORL RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 2 3 �7;‘ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; PROJECT LOCATION BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE • CN EPIC 2. FILE -g¢ POLICE P &R X 71 QQ CS�L12.5.;4. FILE N O. DATE TRANSMITTED 71 2:718+ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY. STAFF COORDINATOR_— RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH, CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. • • ITEM COMMENT • 11- f re 2/ } 27.x' i i a : s �.e..'� 1.;& /n-G1-iGV mot - 54.- c a6h� a h //� a,��cr o� 1- r; �,-�r .�r czvai a_ to , *' d-✓; tYA DATE - ?// /,lam COMMENTS PREPARED BY _- / r C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA MCA - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I�JUL 2 5 1984 PLANNING ING DEP T. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the a-p Tication for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $60.00'must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of. the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND. 1. Name of Proponent: 7i u f&L% L, � OtLILC,(L`�"��° 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: do aC 0 0 Sts clENIT I�L_Vn. 3. Date Checklist Submitted: -]/ a l/8y 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: -PLANINIIt.:. E,PANCIAM.s° 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: \, �� \ 1' 1 sIAccass lorbo zrEMslu� °r Ism % `2 511 4_01,4L- `FVut3uc. R/(►._ .6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size; general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): l�sSU�� 'DIKE JN, ortotIL.. m Pr2.0y Qe uT LI;'�/. AGC 3S P- 0A-�fVAM ►N 1)ar��iC, A( Acct WOfL4L DEGLAt EYY∎Eke- •1Gy P20.1Via';'Titizoo 1114,LPU1;dc- °WO;11 Q�41 ori, `el '4\t , F� ?PR -uk\M 1"j t_"1 `1��0O C�aiG `A'\AAS PILL, • IS Li�S (�n .1)Q Jr� , r .b� i 'a 1M P L '047 ,�q f r-rin 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- • pacts, including any other. information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): r .t_01v csr R0irr I .Ii 0 Fncr CAL f 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: N aQ . 1 & 4 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b). King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO )( YES NO YES NO )( • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X, (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO )c (f) Sign permit YES NO 3( (g) Water hook up permit YES NO)( (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (i) Curb cut permit YES NO .X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO x (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO ?( (1) Other:- ( LL_ "' �N11 ( " N4114 WO: e7P c qtt. ;%.) 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: I tam., (ktri,so ► r SS T.N/A QDS -Eh . A i\-( mt-ENANcf X21 m Q L_ 11. Do you . know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in.: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? ) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2 YES MAYBE NO A (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Iva t E, l KV lo A w ec,OV 1'tq . s-ck Top Puv9 1,4EN o 6 1 t Led P? 1 b 2. Air. Or the p oposa reN! (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air ' quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: '(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- ti x_ (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: GdV S KNE Gr es AtIVIS 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: • YES MAYBE NO • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use.. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural • resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: , 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO .X x_ (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 71d4V ■i0T5 Pri)Otir) Pr 1 tiN Y M> I Uri crN, 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Cv; tt...4. 1) L>1.4) °TemPtitortl 'P r \\ hrt c4i 's • t,.rCL 1,12. Ve 6 ts'ct '"Di 0-.101-4.7 E PA`s mil, 17: Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea= tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. V Si nature and Title Date NOTICE OF ACTION BY c- or luK_wtL -Ps Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW, notice is hereby given that: The we via did on (date), take the action described below. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of chapter 43.2IC RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced within 3C) days or be barred. The action taken by LIT"( ( tnLL`itl.At\ notice of which is hereby given, was as follows: (1) (Here insert description of action taken such as: Adoption Ordinance No. Issued Building Permit; Approved preliminary (or final) plat, etc.) (2) (Here insert brief description of the complete project or proposal.) (3) Said action pertained to property commonly known as: (Sufficient description to locate property, but complete legal description not required) (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during regular business hours at the office of • o-PP r2-i-T\n.113T / ufi'{ t- -L- located at: (Name of , proponent, or applicant,giving notice) Filed by (Signature of individual and capacity in which such individual is signing) —.mss .... `�'se!�!�, _`�+.'.�..'.__.n '��'. .'4� _ �. _ ♦y.'i`::'!= _�'L'�"' f . 44.21C.075 . T41143 RC\V': State Government Execull party seeking review to pay for additional portions of the written transcript. (c) Judicial review under 'this chapter shall without exception be of the governmental action together with,its accompanying environmental determinations. (7) Jurisdiction over the review of determinations un- der this chapter in an appeal before an agency or supe- rior court shall upon consent of the parties be transferred in whole or part to the shorelines hearings board. The shorelines hearings board shall hear the matter and sign the final order expeditiously. The supe- rior court shall certify the final order of the shorelines hearings board and said certified final order may only be appealed to an appellate court. (8) For purposes of this section and RCW 43.21C- .080, the words "action ", "decision ", and "determina- tion" mean substantive agency action including any accompanying procedural determinations under this chapter (except where the word "action" means "ap- peal' ir. RCW 43.21C.080(2) and (3)). The word . "ac- tion in this section and RCW 43.21C.080.'does not mean a procedural determination by itself made under this chapter. The word "determination" includes any en- vironmental document required by this chapter and state or local implementing rules. The word "agency" refers to any state or local unit of government. The word "ap- peal' refers to administrative, legislative, or judicial appeals. (9) The court in its discretion may award reasonable attorney's fees of up to one thousand dollars in the ag- gregate to the prevailing party, including a governmental agency, on issues arising out of this chapter if the court rr,akes specific findings that the legal position of a party is frivolous and without reasonable basis. [1983 c 117 § 4.) Notice.: of action by governmental agency How publicized Form Time limita- tion for commencing challenge to action. (1) Notice of any action taken by a governmental agency may be publicized by the acting governmental agency, the appli- cant for, or the proponent of such action, in substantially the form as set forth in subsection (3) of this section and in the following manner: .(a) By publishing notice on. the same day of each week for two consecutive weeks in a legal newspaper of general circulation in the area where the•property which is the subject of the action is located; (b) By filing notice of such action with the depart- ment of ecology at its main office in Olympia prior to the date of the last newspaper publication; and (c) Except for those actions which are of a nonproject nature, by one of the following methods which shall be accomplished prior to . the date of last newspaper publication; (i) Mailing to the latest recorded real property own- ers. as shown by the records of the county treasurer, who share a common boundary line with the property upon which the 'project is proposed through United States mail. first class, postage prepaid. IT'i,le 43 RCW—p )02) (ii) Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner on the property upon which the project is to be constructed, (2) (a) Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge any such governmental action for which notice is given as provided in subsection 0) of this section on grounds of noncompliance with the provi- sions of this chapter shall be commenced within thirty days from the date of last newspaper publication of the notice pursuant to subsection (l) of this section, or be barred: Provided, however, That the time period within which an action shall be commenced shall be ninety days (i) for projects to be performed by a governmental agency or to be performed under government contract, or (ii) for thermal power plant projects: Provided fur- ther, That any subsequent governmental action on the proposal for which notice has been given as provided in subsection (1) of this section shall not be set aside, en- joined, reviewed, or otherwise challenged on grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(a) through (h) unless there has.been a substantial change in the proposal between the time of the first governmental action and the subsequent gov- ernmental action, or unless the action now being consid- ered was identified in an earlier detailed statement or declaration of nonsignificance as being one which would require further environmental evaluation. (b) Any action to challenge a subsequent governmental action based upon any provisions of this chapter shall be commenced within thirty days from the date of last newspaper pub- lication of the subsequent governmental action except (i) for projects to be performed by a governmental agency or to be performed under 'governmental contract, or (ii) for thermal power plant projects which shall be chal- lenged within ninety days from the date of last newspa- per publication of the, subsequent governmental . action, or be barred. . • (3) The form for such notice of action shall be issued by the department of ecology and shall be made:avail- able by the governmental agency taking an action sub- ject to being publicized pursuant to this section, by the county auditor, and /or the city clerk to the project ap- plicant or proposer. The form of such notice shall be substantially as follows: NOTICE OF ACTION BY (Government agency or entity) Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 43.2)C RCW, notice is hereby given that: The agency or entity) did on (date), take the action described below. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance. .with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State En- v i r on men la 1 Policy Act) shall be commenced within days or be barred. The action taken by (Government agency or entity), notice of which is hereby given, Nis 2s follows: (198: E41 - -- • .. . • ■ • 1,1 _. . . . . . '' -;.._..- -_:-_-_--- • -17,-_____- ------_-__--.--_-_-------- - -------- — -----.--C/...,7_.;./s./. .-"me...,•=s,C).E_ • . . . • "...• . • • • • • • • • • • 7 •••1(!. " " • . _ _•._. sc-7-/c)siv// A .11.1..".01111. ss 77C),, ,- • - / 7 =',4\/".4.::= .1:5' - - - • 4:6? •, Vs."'"—Z— 5E-CT/c7 • - I - , • / 7' •=7 \Skit_ 2 5.1984 • 62i ••••-•- er.) / �— 'rr o.a o ar Vic_!. • O Is • '"` �,. ►SL 2 5 1984} . .. ' , • • r7 1(0 15 14 13• • '':::!."_:t_'`'__...2„_..__...__......t.r..,iQ,f...;se..a._............4..,, .., _ ..., ! i i I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ■ 1 1 . ; .. i 4- . , • .. ' . . . • . . • . i i . , I rib i 1 ! 1 4i ff".'1'..' ' ! ; i .. i • ' ; . , 1 } • 0 i . I 1 . , • . .4_ . .,.......4 ..........4. I I i . . . r ; 1. • 4, i ' : i 1 , 7;.,,,,1,1:!:Illi•ii.):•,.:.1,1 .. ,---,---.--,---,..,-,-,-- : I ! , 1 1 i i : ! • . , , . , • ,---r-7-1. , • . , . . . -.....„,•:. ,, , 1 ; , ! . i• ! 1.-- , , . , f .----r----,..--. ---••• , • •-• .1.----- 1-- • ! i • .! ! • ! • f . • , .• • „ . "." • . • . . • ••.. 1. . • .- , • _ n NL'Al r 2i.1984 PLANNING n pT • • • ;:1 i .- 2�1984 CiT l;# � • : . • > ' IQ - '. NI .. ..---/--/.--..-./,-,/"/P. ----- V. r"- - b- ------. ?II 1 i . . .'._',- i!..e-----' . /94 \-/-%<-4.=.• Az- 4E7 ; !! r , e,•,-Ir.",.s......../...-Itia-"J....,...:4- m'i'•`....,-,'''''-',"''•‘,,S",y.'t•'-',--'''''''"'''''''',"*”.=+•••.•--x,-•••.•••,...c... •,_.,........— ,—,._ , „. ,...,., ,p,....f......... --- •-_. ....— _ .• ==...Itt a "... •••)••"1-...211C1.7....„__ TO ....7....-----,1•-....••■••■••••-•...,-••• f...._0•„,,,,, • I! . . • • ,... . • . . . • • • r _ 17 14, 15 14 12 - ;• .11111,1••■■• 5 14:774/‹...-A.::, • 4 0 =,' i / / A , 4 , . _ . ,- , ....,.......A.. r4s.....5 ,...• .., ...-- A4./.0 7.... 4, .,,,'_f.4--- — ..7,;-.. — 15.. 4/1.• A-/ . : ,,..e.LN,if–_) A • , -•••••• ,./•• / A , .•-•••• ---) - ••••-:• 1-•-• • A .0- A= 41".• VI .14 . - - • • • • • . • • • - • . =IT • -=.601■61..■ tr. -• 3.,(0 L ••• 3EcT 7__/ / / / .••••• ....."'""1 /••'-•" / / ........ /.••••■.,(..._.../r--- 7 / /•'-'-•-• .. i 1 ........... ......._..., . X/ 77 /7)- 1--) ---• / it - c ;" r="-- 7) / .., s / -■ [PJ,V).'d.',PirriT1, • \ la 2 5 1984 , - , - 1 1 . 0.,'-T1 .i:,:v.,L.A., Mt.....,_1312r.-1-------4")7,1 Yrn....... //- • MIN= -I - • nCr%."••••■■■...........••••■■■■•••••••■ _ /// // . • 17 15 M\--,AVI,\■qFa JUL 25 1984 coy, pLANNING DEPT: . 67-1i? fi7,1 r- • • JUL 2 5 1984 \ oF L,\NWG DEPT. • • ; 1 i • i I : 1 •,74 • ; ; ; 1- 4--i-11--L 1 .14 --' i . ;,--f-f--f-i i " : ; 1 .....'4 _i...1.. . . , , . , i :H-1 : i 1---r-*N-.:-.L-7-1--1—,.7 ‘ •• .", • ; .; ; -: . • $ • , . .. I, 1 ! 1 - , : I - I , . ■ _i_ - , i • , , r :. --7 , = = • ,.. • • ■ • • . , • . , . , • : ! , .=--.4.--.4-•-i.---i- 1-44-1,..-„t--1----1--L •;--4---f------1--L--•,--f,•4_ , • - • _. • . , . ._ ..L : ---.. . '''"*".".i -54. ;/2--e!5;.,- • •,-.4' .",,-/ ---- ------- ---- 4 - . . /2/vr-c-;; I 1 .....,-,e.i.l7/.E-01 . • • . . • , ,' " " - ? • . — 7 - , - ..• - . . r-,---.1-,..n,, l'.41,'• , ,, ,.• • • ,: .1., , . 4.11i,..,...;L:ji.!;'1::'::-.3, 4 f"--..1 -1 „if-. •. - . A 4 . . I 1 . - - ••-. . A 4 4 ; . . ‘-';',—,c ., • ..1. ...... i 1: . , ,:il i -- i . ; ' . il!'k t . ....—,--- t ! 1 ■ i ;1774 -' •' / ....• .` i • ..7"-.'l VI t'.• *.::": . j ,4' • . lir * --r I . 1, N.. A . I = .1 .. • — 1 i' 1 , --- ;21:.<7-7(. -1•-•C/r-...—.E/=' • 457,1/ • -St. A A • • tC--- '-- f / i 1 ,4A/o • • • • \-)11q1r\l • • L.JUL 2 5 1984 • • CITY OF I u:vi,LA PLANNING DEPT. • 7- - e : - /2 "c4.c._ -y.E,c7; _ GoAiCE TE - LeeF/12.7 CF_1406,C C _ —_ - - NEW'.: IBrX..T.E.E oktgi.MV _ ii a. �i� t`C• = C.t�.51 ;G' /.A/E -: JUL .85 984 CIT\ CF-1- ' PLAN NG-O Lai @EIV/f i) i.JUL 2 5 1984 1 CITY OF 11 Ur;v , A PLANNING DEPT. Iq-{i l:NE PI!I 2 : 5 1 9 9 . 4 Cf./ 7 PLANNING DEPT. • (JUL 2 5 1984 CITY OF TUKW,LA PLANNING DEPT. �J1JL , 5 1se4; •CITY G lUCL'w1 PLAN 1INT) DEPT.