HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-246-84 - FOSTORIA PARK ASSOCIATES - PRELIMINARY PLATFOSTORIA PARK
4450 - 4490 SE 134' PL
EPIC- 246 -84
WAC 197 -11 -970
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal Preliminary Plat of Fostoria Park
Proponent Fostoria Park Associates
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any
4450 -4490 S.E. 134th P1.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC,A6 -84
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
DI There is no comment period for this DNS
This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted
by
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director
Phone 433 -1845
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Date (9zi' try, 2'L V \81 Signature
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
CITY. OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
CN - -S CE 1.
.IC
FILE 84-30 -fP
ENVIRONMENTAL. ,REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: (7-BLDG ( PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE
PROJECT Z MU )A124 p - FfS-k-.6QZie kokfz -4
LOCATION 4450 —44-90 S I (3 PL-
DATE TRANSMITTED / RI 8+
STAFF COORDINATOR ?ice_
FILE NO.
P & R
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ctiC()l
RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT.THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DATE 702- - YK COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG rifPLNG I P.W.
CN Set-3 6 I
fPic 74-( -8 .
FILE 84 -3d -fp
FIRE ( ( POLICE 1 P &' R
PROJECT lizca4MJAJAYLY pL - fnErabdZa.4 14Wg1!
LOCATION 4450 — 4-4-c(O S, (34-1 PL. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 1 1 2. 8 ¢ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9li11
STAFF COORDINATOR ? LUC- $ , RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG ( PLNG
FIRE
CN --5 O I.
' .P I C ?1-( —8¢
FILE 84'36 —°P
POLICE
P & R
PROJECT r M t3Pst2.4 p S'- etkr24
LOCATION 450 —4-4-9O S , 134-4' (L. FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 9,11)1
DATE TRANSMITTED G l (2.1 84-
STAFF COORDINATOR gj, f5,
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART -
MENT•THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM. COMMENT
A L D C n�
RESPONSE RECEIVED
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • .
CN 6`t- -5 U
lip lc
FILE S4 -3d IP
•BY_ ?S� r 1
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORMUkIkA FIRE E�ENT98 g
TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. [JFIRE ' POLICE P &'R
PROJECT 11\Q.1k)PStZY PLAT cc _fi .8- ep,r2z
LOCATION 1 50 — 4-4-Cp s, 13421R-j- P L
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 41[(11
FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED eil(21 8 4-
STAFF COORDINATOR F( f5,
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE. STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
RESPONSE RECEIVED
ITEM COMMENT
100 ("7ME4fr
DATE •/ //f/stt
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
..._ -- CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
CN B 4: -3 6 I
• PI C
FILE 84'36-113
TO: ( ] BLDG r PLNG [fl P.W. n FIRE r7rPOLICE [ P &'R
PROJECT r? U M U U p c i e 2 4 pL C� $ iopsi,z4
LOCATION 4450 -- 4-4 -C{O S, 134- PL. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED e{ 8 ¢ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY cj[l18'
STAFF COORDINATOR $ RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL "CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED. REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. 'THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU.WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND. CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
IT IS. MY UNDERSTANDING THIS REQUEST IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING T.OT
- LINES AND NOT TO ADD ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS. ON: :DESIGNATED
HAS NO IMPACT ON DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS...PJL
cilLTT
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. °.Form 11
'CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG I PLNG P.W. FIRE
CN 6 - -5 p (.
• I C 2�'� -84(-
FILE 84'3' fP
POLICE P & R
PROJECT _ttijJP L i per- c -�C� dZ1� tom/2
LOCATION 450 — 4-4-go Si 15434 ()L FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED ell (-2.1 8 c,
4- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C()1'
STAFF COORDINATOR F.,( $ , RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART -
MENT.THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM. COMMENT
cps
DATE
lc/
rv
COMMENTS PREPARED BY !Pa',
C.P.S. Form 11
- -'CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
• CN 4 -3 6
EPIC 2+6, _ Bi
FILE 84'36-00
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
T0: rLDG PLNG P.W. RE [�:BCICE �& R
PROJECT r NQM),PSj 24 r...4511- -FC s-raat s
LOCATION 44c3 —4-4 O Si I34 P(- FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4th`
RESPONSE RECEIVED
DATE TRANSMITTED GiII2 8
STAFF COORDINATOR PUCJICL f5,
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA . , PERMIT NUMBER - ''fill CONTROL NUMBER 84'- I
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM
TO: Q BLDG. .Q PLNG. C1 P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE Q P. & R.
PROJECT
ADDRESS 4460 44-9 c s. (34114 toL ,
AAI L-41
DATE TRANSMITTED 61112.1 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY c d rir a4-
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR (a(Lg... 15, RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE
SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH
THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED Q
PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q
PLAN APPROVED Q
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
-permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $60.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
1 BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: bSTa21A ?A(Lk -714JUeCIDR-
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: .411.;" RA1002. AIM Sb ,
Sin
5%144
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
(2ofo) 3 )-3 - 634
4. Agency Requiring Checklist:
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 4vr3taulSIDIO
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
-r e-o r't. <chtieCrA n ry 6-)w APgr45-2! 0.0 $51.R
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
44t-v 44 d , . I ,4 0- PL. fiL kw; /A-
Ce-r I ,roIu»itk 5.5 71 — -
IT
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 4 o /A04<,
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc.
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit
(c) Building permit
YES NO
YES NO V
YES NO V
• •
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NOV
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO ✓'
(f) Sign permit YES NO V
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO ye
(h) Storm water system permit YES NO ✓
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO t/
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NOV
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or :connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
130
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
M0
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
YES MAYBE NO •
v
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3
YES MAYBE NO
1/
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c)' Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna? y
YES MAYBE NO
v
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanatio.:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset. conditions?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?'
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
v
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? 1
(b) Police protection? Lj
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? 1/
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? t,"
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources . of
energy? 1/
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
1
• •
YES MAYBE NO
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity.of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:,
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of _a signifi-
cant . archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Signature and Title.,
-8-
3/, / f*
Date
SECTION 15., TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, ROAWE 4 EAST, W.M.
CITY OF TUKWILA =PITY, WASIWIWTON
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 1 OF 1U8111A SNORT PLAT N0. MF- 79 -26 -SS AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY
RECORDING N0. 00041)40503.
DECLARATION
MEOW ALL 1EN RY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE
OF ENE LAID MENEM- 15CR11ED DO HEREBY ESTABLISH A BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT
PLAN FOR TINE PURPOSE: OF LEASE OF PORTIONS THEREOF, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 58.17,
R.C.M. NIB TITLE 17,- TRIDOLA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THAT SAID PLAN DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A 3U001YLSL411TOF TEE( LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED FOR THE PVVBSE OF
SALE EIN CANER TININSFER OF PORTIONS DIEREOF AND, DECLARES 11101 BEINIAPREUT PROPERTY HEREINFDES RIBED�SHALLL COIIFDEN QED
ALL INSCRI811005 CONTAINED HEREON.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS.
OWNER
BY TITLE
BY : TITLE
BENEFICIARY
BY : TITLE
BY : TITLE :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
SS.
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS DAY OF , 19 , BEFORE ME,
THE OMOERSLGIEO, A NOTARY PUBLIC-PERSONALLY APPEARED
INDIVIDUAL 010181 TOME TORE THE
EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION. AND WHO
ACKNOWLEDGE 0 TO ME THCSAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED
OF SAID 1101911111. FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED.
WITNESS MY WAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.
IN
A50)11GT0N. RESIDE
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ) 55
OR H S
AT
ON THIS DAY OF , 19 , BEFORE ME,
THE UNDER- 51G4ED 80T ARY 1 AMU OR THE STATE 01 WASHINGTON, PER50N-
ALIY APPEARED
TO ME KNOIIM 10 RE _ _
THE CORPORATION 11Lk1 EXYW`1TEIE -i1E F111EE�FSTMG INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED
SAID 115TRUMEIIT 1O M( 144E FINERRITIONORTANY ACT AND DEED OF SAID
CORPORATION FON THE USES AND TLETIEIN MENTIONED AND ON OATH
STATED THAT AUTNOR1(EO TO EXECUTE SAID 105181NENT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED BY
OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.
NOTARY PUBLIC IM ANl) FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON. RES10106 AT
LAND SURVEYQWS CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FOSTORIA PARK,
THE HERETOFORE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, 15 BASED UPON AN *61081118149104481 ACTLIALTIOUNDIRYETAWKYAND
THAT ALL THE COURSES AND DISTANCES SHOWN THEREON ARE CORRECT; AND THAT 1
HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTES AND PLATTING
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA.
DR walliaL-
DANNY P. LIN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
L.S. 015650
AF ROYALS
SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
EXAMINED AND APPROVED THI5 _ _ DAY OF
PURSUANT TO R.C.W. 58.17 AN0 TTTLr17 TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE.
CHAIRMAN SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS
EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS __
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR
DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR
DAY OF
CMG (RTIFIG. TE
DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS
, 1980
, 1980.
FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA THIS _ DAY
OF , 1980, AT MINUTES PAST
, AND RECORDED IN VOLEME OF PLATS,
PAGES , RECORDS OF KING CERMET. WASHINGTON __
MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS
INSCRIPTIONS
1) UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, 1N FAVOR
OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING
N0. 5164175.
2) UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, AS RE-
CORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING N0. 7801040131.
3) RELINQUISHMENT OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO STATE 814101 MO 11F LIGHT.
VIEW AND AIR. MAR THE TERMS OF DEEDS TO THE STAVE OF 01011 EVGTON
AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING 00.'5 5722344, $712570.
AND 5721821.
4) 11169(55, EGRESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT AS SNOW OM CITY OF
TUKWILA SHORT PLAT N0. MF- 79 -26 -SS AS RECORDED UNDER KING
COUNTY RECORDING N0. 8004240503.
LEGEND
o ./..REELA R i CAP LS 0/3450
• 4W AIMR l CAP L.3 R /SO4/
LOT
(nlfr� }7�rtnr, r
(.n] L t,-; ( +J \J I iL')
FOSTORIA PARK _-- - -_._�
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN r. E AJ G 31. 1984
SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. . CO Y
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON _ PLANNING r Fp p-.
•
_7.r : •
r\ / � -"` - EASEML<Nr PCR C /TYOF TUNN' /L
! / SM0.RY PLAT NO. Mr- Tl- Ii -SS)
�' KING COUNTY RECOAD,NG
•A.* AO. .DDAA/OrJp3,
SCALE 1'= 50'
/NGRES3. EGRESS ! amine-3
rb,
-
r
NOTES
1
4 teed"
e't °s
RX AQO /T /OVAL INPORMATMV SEE CITY OF TUKIV/LA
SNORT PLAT NO. MP- 75 -24 -SS AS RECORDED UNDER
K/N6 COUNTY AECORO /N6 M0. 0000PIO503. SCE ALSO
RECORD OF SURVEY F /LED /N IE LUME /3, PM.Se 223.
AYCLWOS ORK/NG OUNTY.IKYSM /N67AN.
Project No1-226-001-805 SHEET?of 2
E.GKEEREIRA 5ERS
SEATTLE / KENO / LAS VORIS
101 Ill MOMS MT.
rm •• __
TIMMONS awl swam