Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-25-88 - PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES - SHAMROCK CENTERSHAMROCK CENTER OFFICE BUILDING, WAREHOUSE & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE 47T" AVE. S. & S. 134T" ST. EPIC 25 -88 • PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 October 24, 1988 Mr. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner City of Tukwila, Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Shamrock Center Grading and Fill Permit PDA # 8- 847 -01 -03 Dear Vern: Pursuant to our telecon of October 20, 1988, our geotechnical engineers, John Sadler of Cascade Geotechnical, has reviewed our grading and fill plans by Barghausen Engineers dated October 10, 1988. The following are John Sadler's comments: 1. The plans are acceptable as drawn. 2. Heavy machinery should not be used for compaction within 20 feet of the existing Far West Paint building. A suggested compaction machinery is a tow - behind vibratory roller or any lightweight machinery. 3. Lightweight fill material such as fine grade sand should be used adjacent to the Far West Paint building. 4. It should be noted that driven pilings are not recommended as per the soils report. 5. The geotechnical engineers for the Far West Paint building, coincidently, was Cascade Geotechnical. The preload for the Far West Paint building as reported by Cascade, extended 10' from the face of the building and the fill extends an additional 10' into our property. • • Mr. Vernon Umetsu October 24, 1988 page 2 On behalf of the developer, we agree to have final paving installed within six months of the completion of the building. The date of completion is to be determined by the Certificate of Occupancy of the building shell. We also agree to have a geotechnical engineer on site to inspect and approve the installation of the auger -cast piles as noted in the structural notes. Cascade Geotechnical will send a letter as a follow -up to confirm their recommendations. Please contact me if there are any questions. Respectfully, YJ Ken K. Chin, A.I.A. Director of Architecture PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES YKC:vas cc: John Sadler Ed O'Sullivan • PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 October 24, 1988 Mr. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner City of Tukwila, Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Shamrock Center Grading and Fill Permit PDA # 8- 847 -01 -03 Dear Vern: In reference to our telephone conversation this morning we agree, on behalf of the developer, to abide with the recommend- ation of Cascade Geotechnical concerning this project. This includes, but is not limited to, the required testing of any soil to be used as fill and the review as required for the placement of the fill. I hope this will meet your requirements. Please contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Greg R. Brant Managing Architect PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES GRB:vas %-a 67. M O N 1 3 : 22 CASCADE TEST • (011CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A OMSION Of CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 KIRKLAND: (206) 821.5080 SEATTLE: (206) 5256700 October 21, 1988 Job No. 886 -26G Pacific Design Associates 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 Attention: Ken Chin PRELIMINARY Reference: Shamrock Center 47th Avenue S. @ S. 134th Street Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Chin: As requested, we have reviewed the Grading and Stoma Drainage Plan for the above referenced site by Barghatjsen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated September 2, 1988. Based on our telephone conversation with you and our review of the grading plan, we understand that site grades are planned on being raised approximately two (2) feet in the area of Building A. As stated in our soil report for the site dated July 11, 1988, we recommend'against pre - loading on the site, specifically in the area of Building A because of the proximity of the neighboring Far West Paints building to the north. The northwest side of Building A lies in an area that has been affected by the pre-loading of the Far West Paints building. We feel that the relatively small amount of fill proposed for Building A should have little or no impact on the Far West Paints building if the following recommendations are strictly followed. We recommend that any fill placed within twenty (20) feet of the northwest property boundary consist of a relatively light density soil such as a clean fine grained sand. We understand that all building and floor loads at the site will be supported by a deep foundation. With this being the case, compacting the fill soil in the building areas is not necessary or recommended. We recommend that we be engaged to view and test any soils proposed for use as fill and observe the placement of the fill. We trust that this information meets your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL George E. Lamb, P.E. Principal Engineer JCS:lal PRELIMINARY �fut (24S�1f2_ John C. Sadler Engineering Geologist City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 October 21, 1988 Ken Chin Pacific Design Associates 4039 21st Avenue West Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98199 RE: Shamrock Center Dear Ken, This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation yesterday. You have agreed to submit the following in order to complete Planning Department review of the proposed grading permit. 1. Have the Geotechnical report revised to specify actions to be taken to minimize settlement, estimate the amount of expected settlement, and approve the proposed grading plan. 2. Write a letter to the Planning Director agreeing to implement all recommendations contained in the Geotechnical report. 3. Specify when final surfacing of all paved areas will be completed and what temporary measures will be taken if necessary during a settlement period. The Planning Director will review this information to determine if the proposed project satisfies all City requirements. Please contact me immediately if I have misunderstood anything. Sincerely, enoP�tsu, ssociate Planner OFFICIAL NOTICE NOTICE IS GIVEN under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075, that the City of Tukwila took the action described in (2) below on October 12, 1988. 1. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review or otherwise challenge such action must be commenced within 10 days pursuant to Ordinance Number 1331. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of non - compliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced within 30 days after notice, no later than November 12, 1988. All appeals should be filed with the clerk of the King County Superior Court, Room E609, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 (344- 2530). Any person desiring to raise SEPA issues by judicial appeal must submit a notice of intent to do so with the SEPA Responsible Official, the Tukwila Planning Department, within 10 days of the date of action which is October 22, 1988. 2. Description of agency action: A Determination of Non - Significance has been made regarding the construction of three 1 -story buildings (20,900, 23,100 and 13,200 gsf) on a 4.56 -acre site. 3. Location of proposal: N.E. corner of the South 134th Street /47th Avenue South intersection in the east 1/2 of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Tukwila, Washington. 4. Type of environmental review under SEPA Environmental Checklist (EPIC- 25 -88). 5. Documents may be examined during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) in the Planning Department at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. 6. Name of agency giving notice: 7. This notice is filed by: Tukwila Planning Department. Signature Title /i i /g8 Date Distribution: Project Site, Applicant, City Clerk, Mayor, Dept. of Ecology, File WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal CONSTRUCTFTHREE, 1 -STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS (20,900; 23,100; & 13,200 G.S.F.) ON A 4.56 ACRE SITE Proponent O'SULLIVAN DEVELOPMENT Location of Proposal, including street address, if any N.E. CORNER OF THE SOUTH 134TH STREET /47TH AVENUE SOUTH INTERSECTION IN THE EAST 1/2 OF SEC. 15, TWN 23N, RGE 4 E; TUKWILA, WA. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-25 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [Xax There is no comment period for this DNS Ei This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Date 72 / )i Signature Phone 433 -1846 You may appeal this determination to the ity Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS PUBLISHED VALLEY DAILY NEWS OCTOBER , 1988 • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: eiLe FROM: t(44i,t DATE: / 2 , / 8 8 SUBJECT: 5/111 /V1,&0 C4< C &V17C ( T it ve3 -ro .PCr M r v/v PCJ . S'7-4-A () (" G 7'ffR T Ti4'e .Cr Aiz cfry eTSo C- A vT e"7L V /kon!MeAc 4 C_ /SS an fftei "4le -0Ck G L E T [ 8 ` 7 72 +f A s- am 1 ro Min'# 7 c nl (S PO?c.rC c,3oieKS kesoi �'3s Tff�SQ /ssQ S &LX N� P6RJIr7T acy is s u En ii. As CAN Pc.oi s c- Abu Ise- / <4- %COY Ong CC StGnr(Frc4ls(r /SS) S Alec ,ee'S® v�Do Au, ass vas ,ersot vet 7o / /88 : /1-2? ,e od„r /9Cri2 191!/ C. PR As-01_ o, ( :)/t/ 5 i/e /o/ /2/8'' • • PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 October 3, 1988 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Associate Planner City of Tukwila, Planning Dept. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 OCT .1988 RE: Shamrock Center Admended SEPA Review: Grading & Fill Permit PDA # 8- 847 -01 -03 Dear Vern; Thank you for the review comments of the reference project per my telephone conversation with Mr. Jack Pace on September 29, 1988. To expedite the Admended SEPA Approval & Fill Permit Application, please be advised of the following: 1. On behalf of the developer, a geotechnical engineering analysis report shall be submitted to the City to qualify the imported fill. 2. The grading & fill shall be performed in - conformance to city standards and regulations. 3. Detailed drawings showing grading & fill was submittal to the city as a separate permit application on 9 -2 -88. 4. Enclosed are the up -dated revised site plan for your record. Please do not hesitate to contact ,me if there are any questions. YKC /vmp n, A.I.A. Architecture cc: Mr. Jack Pace, Tukwila Planning Ed O'Sullivan, Shamrock Center • . PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 . Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 September 22, 1988 Mr. Jack Pace, Senior Planner Tukwila Planning 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Amendment to SEPA Review # EPIC 25 -88 Shamrock Center Fill & Grade Permit PDA # 8- 847 -01 -03 Dear Jack: We are submitting an amendment to the SEPA Review Checklist referenced above, for a separate fill & grade permit to be issued prior to the building permit. The amount of fill for Shamrock Center will be 3000 cubic yard. Fill sources will be from the adjacent McLees property. Any additional remaining fill will be from the D.O.T. Tunnel project. All reasonable measures will be implimented to minimize impacts to the enviornment. Any required permits will be obtained for the performance of the grading and fill. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control shall be as shown in the drawing; sheet C -3 of 3. Ple.se cont -ct me at 286 -8416 if there are any questions. Res Y. Ken Chin, A.I.A. Di ector of Architecture PA IFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES YKC:vmp RECEIVED CITY OF TUKwn.a SEP 22 1988 OUILDitabo Det i . . September 19, 1988 • • PACIFIC CENTERS, INC. \ SEP 211988 Molly Headley Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SEPA Review of Shamrock Estates Dear Ms. Headley: Thank you for your letter of September 14, 1988 regarding the status of the SEPA review of Shamrock Estates. To facilitate our application, please be advised of the following: 1. That Shamrock Center will not protest the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the area; 2. That Shamrock Center will retain the right to protest the amount of funds required by the LID; 3. That Shamrock Center will provide a picnic table for employee use on site. We have requested that Pacific Design Associates contact Nick Olivas in the Fire Department to discuss an unresolved issue raised in the pre- application meeting. We appreciate your assistance in this application process. Please keep us advised of the most current status. Sincerely, SHAMROCK CE ER Edward J. O'Sullivan 1200 Westlake Ave. N., Suite 505 • Seattle, Washington 98109 • (206) 283 -3030 We make small centers big business. PACT IC DESIGN ASSOCIATE? 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 September 19, 1988 Ms. Molly Headley Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SEPA Review of Shamrock Center PDA #8- 847 -01 -03 Dear Ms. Headley: S EP 19 1988 On behalf of the applicant, Mr. Ed O'Sullivan, we are responding to the concerns brought about by the SEPA Review. 1. The name of the applicant on the Environmental checklist should be changed from O'Sullivan Developement to Mr. Ed O'Sullivan. 2. Shamrock Center will not protest the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the area. 3. Shamrock Center will retain the right to protest the amount of funds required by the LID. 4. Shamrock Center will provide a picnic table for employees' use on site. 5. An approved central monitored alarm system will be provided for Building A as an alternate to a fire apparatus access road. NOTE: A sprinkler system will be provided. The area of concern greater than 150' from a fire apparatus access road is a 5 1/2" tilt -up concrete wall without any openings. This addresses all concerns regarding the SEPA Review as noted in your letter dated September 14, 1988. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Jacqueline Naab at 286 -8416 if there are any additional comments. lly, Y. - n, A.I.A. Di ector of Architecture cc: Nick Olivas, Asst. Fire Chief, Tukwila Fire Department Ed O'Sullivan YKC /vmp City. of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 September 14, 1988 Ed O'Sullivan Shamrock Center c/o Ken Chin Pacific Design Associates 4039 21st W. Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98199 RE: SEPA REVIEW OF SHAMROCK ESTATES Dear Mr. O'Sullivan: On Wednesday, August 31, 1988, I spoke with Jacquelyn of Pacific Design Associates regarding the status of your SEPA review. I informed her that she needed to complete the following before the City can take any further action: 1. Send a letter stating: a) Shamrock Center will not protest the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the area. b) Shamrock Center will retain the right to protest the amount of funds required by the LID. c) Shamrock Center will provide a picnic table for employee use on site. 2. Contact Nick Olivas in the Fire Department to discuss resolution of a previous issue discussed in the pre - application meeting. As of today, September 13, 1988, no correspondence has been received by this office and as a result, this application is still pending. Please feel free to contact me or Jack Pace at 433 -1847 if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Molly Heady Planning Department • • r n TELEPHONE MEMO RE: .S h a m ivei( eju & Uf-I'fi1 niud 1L eP.tp < PERSON CONTACTED: - 8 -11( PERSON CALLING: O DATE: 3f 88 INFORMATION ITEMS: Az4z1LA_ cUte.. itetX Pl6tat :I_Iilsx.i.:4∎V k /,TIV'lirihNc_.ae =• /. % _! 1_.L:.ii[11/1&' lu:to. p:oA.Zei iii s r. B : meal ' `�" Cyr 4a. J (.u. 575-410 -f I�J � /7!�� +�L• t��wi / 'isl�/1�, 1��!�(/SQri %:I4;/0" • /,ICI / li .%Jf�yworAt... ..--15c���i0%G..= ,-Iulm rl/ . .' .mani:770i1110.1MIMINEWM1411.00:1 -MAW -/1/ol1111 .co-rmr/_/3 /.I'i%% //le %~fd r ia al,. il / I�raima / airw/_L, gvaim L/!eicAr/.—!//m'J . li,ii�...„. ..c I / / I • •i P c .t-a.� �o( awe., izie4444, CITY OF TUKWILA • • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 25 -88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG [n PLNG P.W. n FIRE n POLICE El P & R PROJECT Shamrock Center LOCATION 47th Ave. S. & S. 134th St. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Molly Headley RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 23tjr0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 25 -88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: (1 BLDG r--1 PLNG P.W. . FIRE fj POLICE ( J P & R PROJECT Shamrock Center LOCATION 47th Ave. S. & S. 134th St. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Molly Headley RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT na4 4th 0 74 c e.4a, i► -%ics i ��u- w G��r i . U Zta-g wa.4- a /d'u.44 -d `I /1Zeesseit,. wa i. e.. �(hd-1 err 711,6& WL / ,> / � ) �� � �j� fir, v 4 / i d ! Aged a_ 4-tki Lam/ /rd�l - e z. A/-41 : cc-- l%- m-e_., ,acc- J %¢sl�iLt¢GQ iel/L ICJ, ee //1d/ixod ,, Ae_R Zi l2 60it1.(.liG��aJl1.P 44.6vf4z ..A i( t__ hte. iQ/Lc- �✓ 1 iPt. I • / ham, a,„„ j ..9� /24 ° ( Q.1 -) /04 l 9 &) to /6 /88 DATE 8%2-22 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 41IL CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM III CN EPIC 25 -88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG PLNG [j P.W. ri FIRE [J POLICE ,. —P & R PROJECT Shamrock Center LOCATION 47th Ave. S. & S. 134th St. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Molly Headley RESPONSE RECEIVED' THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE- 1/(,//////d COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN J EPIC 25 -88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG n PLNG f P.W. [j FIRE ni POLICE [j P & R PROJECT Shamrock Center LOCATION 47th Ave. S. & S. 134th St. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 8 -3 -88 STAFF COORDINATOR Molly Headley RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 8 -10 -88 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COM /ME T DATE )71 377k/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 PAC IC DESIGN ASSOCIATE 4039 21st Avenue West, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 (206) 284 -0479 - FAX (206) 286 -8416 SHAMROCK CENTER PROJECT # 8- 847 -01 -03 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL 1 Parcel "A" of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 80 -13 -SS as recorded under Auditors File No. 8009030472, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL 2 Lot 1 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 81 -39 -SS as recorded under Auditors File No. 8204280545, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL 3 Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 81 -39 -SS as recorded under Auditors File No 8204280545, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL 4 Parcel "B" of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. 84- 35 -BLA as recorded under Auditors File No 8501240853, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL 5 Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 87 -4 -SS as recorded under Auditors File No. 8804270766 Records of King County, Washington. AUG ®21988 P'Jt�'ot, • Control No. Epic File No. 25-88 Fee ($100) Receipt No.Y,. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: SHAMROCK CENTER. 2. Name of applicant: O'SULLIVAN DEVELOPMENT. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: PACIFIC DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4039 21ST AVE WEST SEATTLE, WA 98199 (206) 286-8416 Y. KEN K. CHIN DIRECTOR OF ARCHITECTURE 4. Date checklist prepared: JULY 28, 1988. 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF TUKWILA. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly effecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA REVIEW APPROVAL. BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, GRADE AND FILL PERMIT, DEMOLITION PERMIT. • • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. DEVELOPMENT OF THREE ONE -STORY CONCRETE TILT -UP BUILDINGS; 20,000 SQUARE FEET, 22,000 SQUARE FEET, & 12,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 198,000 SQUARE FOOT SITE. BUILDINGS WILL BE FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. LOCATED AT THE NORTH CORNER OF SOUTH 134TH STREET AND 47TH AVE SOUTH; A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4, NE /1/4, SEC. 15, T.23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as envir- onmentally sensitive? NO. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% AT WEST CORNER. c. What general types of soils are found on the site? If you know the classification of agricultural soils specify them and note any prime farmland. CLAY /SILT, SILT, PEAT, SAND, GLACIAL TILL d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NONE. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. FILL AND GRADING WILL BE REQUIRED. SOURCE AND QUANTITY UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME. ALL FILL AND GRADING TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NOT LIKELY. G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? APPROXIMATELY 85 %. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE IMPACT DURING CONSTRUCTION. AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES SHALL BE LANDSCAPED, EXCEPT FOR THE PROPOSED GRAVEL AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE YARD. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. MINOR AMOUNTS OF VEHICULAR EXHAUST BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND DUST DURING CONSTRUCTION. INSIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF VEHICULAR EXHAUST AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. DURING CONSTRUCTION SPRINKLING OF WATER TO CONTROL DUST AS REQUIRED. 3 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds wetlands)? If yes, describe. NONE. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NOT APPLICABLE. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO. 4 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any. Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NOT APPLICABLE. NO DISCHARGE INTO THE GROUND. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water, flow into other water? If so, describe. STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL BE COLLECTED BY. ROOF DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS, THEN TIGHT -LINED TO EXISTING DITCH. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface water? If so, generally describe. NO. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: TEMPORARY DRAINAGE CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL PERVIOUS AREAS OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PROPOSED GRAVEL - SURFACED EQUIPMENT STORAGE YARD, SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. MISCELLANEOUS SCRUB TREES. evergreen tree: _X_ shrubs _X_ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered. ALL SCRUB VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED. SIGNIFICANT EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PRESERVED WHERE FEASIBLE. - 5 - C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: SIGNIFICANT EXISTING TREES WILL BE PRESERVED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE PLANNED LANDSCAPING. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL PERVIOUS AREAS WILL BE LANDSCAPED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE GRAVEL - SURFACED EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: NONE Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: NONE. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish: NONE b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so explain. NO. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. NOT APPLICABLE. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR GENERAL USE, INCLUDING HVAC. NATURAL GAS FOR HEATING. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO. 6 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if. any: THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO ALL WASHINGTON STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. ALL EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED ARE EXISTING AND AVAILABLE TO THE PROPOSED SITE. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NOT APPLICABLE. B. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? EXISTING TRAFFIC NOISE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA, INCLUDING SR -599, WILL NOT AFFECT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. SHORT -TERM CONSTRUCTION NOISES OF AN INSIGNIFICANT LEVEL WILL BE CREATED DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS BETWEEN 7 AM AND 5 PM. LONG -TERM NOISE WILL BE CAUSED BY TRAFFIC AND WILL BE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: CONSTRUCTION TO TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 7AM AND 5PM OF NORMAL WORKING DAYS AND HOURS. • • 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? SITE: MOSTLY VACANT W /EXISTING ABANDONED BUILDING AND AN EXISTING OCCUPPIED HOUSE. ADJACENT: RESIDENTIAL TO WEST, WAREHOUSING TO NORTH SR -599 TO EAST, RESIDENTIAL AND WAREHOUSING TO SOUTH. ' b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT IN RECENT HISTORY. c. Describe any structures on the site. ABANDONED;DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS AND ONE EXISTING HOUSE. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NOT APPLICABLE. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO. i. Approximately how may people would reside or work in the completed project? LESS THAN 75 ARE EXPECTED. J. Approximately how may people would the completed project displace? POSSIBLY ONE FAMILY. THE SELLER OF THE PROPERTY. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts if any: NONE. • • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. PROJECT SHALL CONFORM WITH ZONING AND ALLOWABLE USE. PROPOSED AESTHETICS WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING ADJACENT STRUCTURES. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? NONE. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be elimin- ated? Indicate whether high, middle, low- income housing. ONE LOWER- MIDDLE INCOME HOUSE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts if any. NONE. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structures, not including antennas what is the principal exterior building material proposed? 24' FROM FINISH GRADE. 'MATERIAL TO BE CONCRETE AND GLASS. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any. THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ARCHI- TECT. CONCRETE TILT -UP CONSTRUCTION METHODS, INCORPOR- ATING ARCHITECTURAL REVEALS, CIRCULAR COLUMNS AND STORE- FRONT GLASS WILL BE USED. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will .. the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? PARKING SECURITY. LIGHTS, TENANT SIGNAGE LIGHTS, AND INTERIOR LIGHTS. • • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: PARKING SECURITY LIGHTS AND SIGNAGE LIGHTS WILL BE DIRECTED AND DEFUSED IN MANNERS WHICH WILL MIMIMIZE IMPACT. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on 'recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NOT APPLICABLE. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NOT APPLICABLE. - 10 - 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 47TH AVE SOUTH TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE. SOUTH 134TH STREET TO THE SOUTHWEST ULTIMATELY LEADS TO SR -599 AND INTERURBAN TO THE NORTHEAST. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NEAREST TRANSIT ROUTE IS ALONG INTER -URBAN APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE AWAY. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? APPROXIMATELY 80 CREATED WITH NONE ELIMINATED. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe. (indicate whether public or private). NONE EXPECTED. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? if so, generally describe. NO. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NOT APPLICABLE. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO. • • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NOT APPLICABLE. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ELECTRICITY, NATURAL GAS, WATER, REFUSE SERVICE, TELEPHONE, SANITARY SEWER. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. MINOR TRENCHING WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXTEND AND CONNECT SOME EXISTING UTILITIES TO THE PROJECT. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date submitted: sl Please continue to the next page. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIOIT • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal tie likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. Now would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands ?. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -19- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL•NT . Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and,the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: -22- 1 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only fsirstB.ENr CP COP, MINT CPkav,,,,.oPPISO GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES 1.. PROVIDE FIRE HYDRANT.IN* THE vICINITY OF BUILDING C AS REQUIRED' BY TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT...: ALL PARKING' STALLS SHALL HAVE 2' -0' OVERHANG OPEN" GRAVEL •SURFACE AREA: - .(FUTURE)` _ .. • GRAVEL SURFACED EQUIPMENT STORAGE LAMGSCAPIMG AREA (TM.) 10' -O " TRUCK ` DOOR DOCK- HIGH • LAMOSCANRG AREA (TM.) l - RAMP DOWN - L -12x65 DOCK HIGH /RAMP`DOWN ..:..TRUCK (2) 20' TRUCK -` J;: LOADING' ' DOORS DRIVE IN 10'• OWE „ . • :IN- TRUCK ' DOOR • ORAWN PMB CHECKED YKC APPROVED YKC DATE 09/09/88 • .09/30188 n 0 -0 000E Of ASPMKr P3.0 i PAP PIO O P.° (Ml BUILDING B 110'X210'. "- (FUTURE" PERMIT). a' DOOM SEre.ac (OP . u• sTaET �µoscwvc — PROEM" LM 1w..? 0'. CONCRETE WALK (TYP) 3300 1V R.0.LL Or3ICA1Id lM ROPOSED \STREET DEWAIK k1' MPROVEMEIIT 1 _O-- - (I0' -0_ • 1T- O' Cr - O.ORMwA {yy gRKV�� R' SITE PLAN SCALE: _1= 30' -0" REVISED: 09/30/88 PDA# 8-847-01-03-000 YKC /PMB PRINTED OCT 0319E8 • PARCEL 1 Parcel 'A' of City, of Tukwila Short Plat No. 80-13-SS as recorded under Auditors File,No. 8009030472. Records of King County, Washington. , PAC301-2 Lot 1 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 81-39-SS as recorded under Auditors File No. 8204280545. Records of'King County, . , . Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 81-39-S6 as recorded under Auditors Fits No 8204280545. Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL 4 Parcel °B. of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. 84-35-BLA as recorded under Auditors File No 8501240853. Records of King County, Washington. , pARCEL 5 • • - Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No. 87-4-SS as recorded under Auditors File No. 8804270766 Records of King County. Washington. .LEGAL DESCRIPTION tkEn sr wIti2stirtER ifflemIcrtuNPAUt mom tringlagrailyittu TTIOSE SLAWS ANO S PECISCATC&O APS COw. SOW MAMMAL AEO •=111 TA. SOUS PRICPSAT, PACS.0 OEM& ASSOCIATE& SEAM& WA. WTV W OW OE ONALITTOSOED USE CP .mese PLASS RENERSES IJSEP LW.. TO WICISECUTLIW 4WS 0. 7,4 lANISSO STATES DRAWN .pHECKED APPROVED =1.91111 upiiimweic VICINITY 75409571 tot 371i9 201■1[11.C; OCCUPANCIES S S 1$703,REA BP1111:1114. AREA LOTICOVE RAGE PARK914GaPROVIDED ECT TABULATION 9cic booet , BUILDING A 110.X190' 8A4N0 075.02 140 75 STRUT 02*050-5404 oict, LANDSCAPING ARM5OTYPI mmAmmr use Is44r 2t 80.40.0 0Y5502 Ott 15 SMELT 1.2*050*150.4 LAI LANDSCAPING AREA ITYPI RECTO 15' 500 DEOC2/109 PROPERTY SOUTH 1 34 t h STREET Xr 'Kt -0* 410.-0- 0.-O' -o. *090' -0* i'Ect:to.o .. CRY OF 44:1113INE F/hYr PRINTED AU6 021988 .• SIT PLAN SCALE : I PDAI 8-847-01-03-000 , < \8/l/88 1 . , ThCiPME1 .1 • z uJ w F.. z la 0 > zo z c,) 2 n C C - • 0 - 4 ° x z . CONCRETE TILT—UP PANELS CAST—IN—PLACE REVEALS 24" DIAMETER CONCRETE COLUMNS TINTED- GLASS TiFilINGEIVIENT 0. COPY- F•2147 0. LINAL1 ,01.11.60 BUILDING A SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 8/1/88 SCALE: 1 /8"=1.-0" PIDA/ 8-847-01-03-000 YKC/PMEI -401‘=•2:•• DATE 8/ 1 /88 A • A BUILDING, s;UJHEAsT ELEVATION • BUILDING B SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: /8" • — 0" ' PDA/ 8-847-01-03-000 8/1/88 YKC/P1.18 BUILDING B SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE.. A.•-•;•-,i • 8/1/88 . PDA/ 8-847-01-03-000 YKC/P118 • A. CC w ILI 2 1110 > 0 w 0 Z 2 Z ck) j. 0 EC - 2 1` _EL o co. X 0 n1 0 . . SHAMROCK CENTER TUKWILA , WASHINGTON. NEW PROJECT FOR 0 SULLIVAN DEVELOPMEN PDA • 8841-01-03 - Pacific (206) 2136.84113 Design Associates 4039 21st, Ave. West Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98199 '. ? m ' t 1 2 2J VI A z '' plo.illi Iiiiltfilprig 22!81,yAR ;4AgitInt -. - -°' :: ' " • 71-11.16 RA.B AND COPY- 1:10-11. 161.11EPW AND Yie 60.E 6 .6BOOaTEB. EAT LE wA AM.. a P _ ROCKwa4V.Lh-. 4Ee 00•''. .i N/L p4A/ ' o e•, 1y .Q, n " •� . PROPOSED GRAVEL. SURFACED VO - _ 'EQUIPMENT STORAGE j8 iii, /° 12 oQ. It a.. . 9 rszsa>�a'oDTJ " '1 7.)( (' 0) r) DRAWN L.w._ CHECKED t• 44°R4 APPROVE. PPROVED DATE -1 -4->'� ©• A\. -2 -el LAm-1-Tj'P c51 lDx , ti ill .. �y r u .......... U Q e ,,1 e 2 z '`ai' Q F o 1 _tlI Y Q Q_ Or iii el tr_011f01111 !M.MQwt <. *VC Mei { R b eroo ,5. 4.0• cmc a wrt EXISTING BUILDING A U:. otticoao o a - W s W Z Z a vim; Avitral' PROPOSED,,'`?x, BUILDING --B` r/N6 P Afc _ )°1.5T,44e, 5 /DE- VALkL044r' 4 5■427 FDRMA- TioiJ. ot-Jur 5cD 77pcAL ir/ ALL LocATiorlG. SOUTH you 1.6 J_-T 'P.. BURT e0 DRAi4 L/NBf . :uriLrn6 /N Trle58 PR. i .VCR /Pr .4 u. Loc4T'»J ' .pRio/L. .To 17Iyyv.JC7. SCAT E .1 "= 30' -0" PDA# 8- 847 -01 -03 -000 ' Lynn William Horn &Associates - BTATE DF 1' r1,44,1 :1 ® y� F u6 pi - rjlNCa D 1F 1I IGr SG,1sL E �L�ri L4 T: 'MEWL - �i��LJICAL I.la -M i AC 0.W t -1 it "' FIa?'ri. " CST" j+-rLe d „ A euor:l7vMU=. f u161-o- 141.6.I2E1sNTpo -ORl E4As-17•.' \I • ref.IWIrIKLE, 1 Contractc•- -shall obtain a11'.permits and pay any fees. - as'required for -any work. "assoriated with, tr.e work shown ands any 1 •i gation .wort - - _ Verif •y-locatinns of al't •utilities•pricr to' 5ny.,work•,-Adjust.(. • work as required, upon approval. :of the Le, 'and/or -ether consultants - _ / verify location ot all easeme is prior to any', 5t.. • . Br1ng ell - adverse conditions.' to LA's atten'.:on..prior:to• 1. corrections - .. Contractors -shall ' :conform ':and'- comply with all regulations as required by the,goverementel agenCtes, - which,' "' • this.project occurs within., Abrevietlons - for interpretation of plan: : ' •- dc'000n center,.BLE-= balled. -& burlapped, tont..= container,- -• "I. ' ht = heigth', sprd:= spread, -[al =capper, 4.1 oat ito scale( min = minimum , -. LA=Landsc ape:Arc hltect' 4' All groundcover: shall_be:planted using triangle spacing a - uvrcb Hi ,,TEE DRAWN: L-4-605.1 0F4EDKEO 1'04 APPROVED [DATE 9 -4•f& A 2 -3 ''f 8- ej 5 Plant as per-details provided ';Adjustments will be by the. LA only. Br.1ng any proposed changes' to' LA's etc inn prior,- - to changes. Areas of tandi g 515105 . hall "be b ght'-to thel, • LA's. attention - - + 6 Rototill the existing,. soil td.a'deptn of 6•.prior...tc•.. any.:" topsoil• .,placement.in all :groundcover, olanttng :beds ,.and lawn a 1 Rake offa ail. rocks• 2'- 'diameter and'larger Place.4 "'depth of 3-way mix 'lopsoil. c t approved equal. to these new groundcover. beds and'•1aun areas Soine:beds may'require more than the • minimum 4" depth of topsoil; adjust_ as' required Three wai;mix soil. is. approximately 705 sandy loam."soll,- 205 peat moss,` a d 10R1Csopoot -ed manure, with -a 1e -14 -14 fen tilizer' mixed in at -.the rate :of -2 lbs.' per 10 cubic-yards -This :topsoil ',six.shall be 'the only,soil in the'plant:'.hples of.: • all plants No existing soil tin site. shall be.used - 1," • n the plant/ ng ':of a vnew'.plants. �'- Source. of'', .the topsoil shall. be approved by the. L4. prior ' tc•- Strip 511- existing weeds /grasses - •prior. io any- t psoil placement Remove 11-.debrt from'site - Plant beds-shall•be to -the xsatietaction of the-LA 95101 to.planttng. ' and': shall. only. occur after approval of • such... The berr•s- against the buildings sill be .constructed' by.the,i general contracts•? Tha landscape contractor sral L-plate 4" of topsoil on the subgrade bern : :a-nd'compact'the3soils LO'a oid.sl. o. 7 ' Plant pits shall be w e the s cf" th,e.rxtbalis.ht: ands width .Plant 'as 'shown in details e..carify :6. of soil under'1.- the plant p t .- Contractor shall •t.st the pits for-drainage. - problems,,' it any problems - e me d•they shall.be b o 3n . to. the LA !s atte do %for.' do pi r t .the-contractor 40. ,A UiJkxx... LUKATAIJIG.4 • �!�"�UC -'0R-e Lk- . .0 A. ,,,e,L-0 ..4,409-d,,--f 441.I' ..a.rlE 6,4 V ,& I- Fui-tvS 1.A.U0- -E ` �S' 'OTT° I V it Et,4 •;.ME 2' A . e...4.-l(as. VU LC IS,. LI L< C 2?7 a F}}ac2bekap2Cnl I lf`�J ' r lE 22; Lei n • 'Lo13 .F ilUl-I•ITi. . w02-174.--77-; si-k LL V �(F T [Dort r--r-r ,-., I�IOk To P IDDiIJCo, FG�i,t-x1se -r ■ 1.01.309. any'ec Lion 650905ed drainage 'solo ttons st.a11 "be appro ed :by the LA. No 'plants will -be allowed to be- planted during "times .of prolonged freezing,. and during - times.'. wr, is the :topsoil is in ' a wet or muddy co dition :-- Plant -only during.. times- of - -lo ally! accepted practice Stake,trees as shown -in the details'. 1 - 9 - Fertilize all -trees and shrubs and l gallon groundcover th 9100` -release formula fertiliser tablets. »20 -10-5, as per manufacturers - recoaimendations. Agriform b a.d'tablets or approved' equal. 9. All mulch in plant beds shall be approximately 1/2" below all adjoining h rd.su f es, -.rod edges._ top of curbs. etc .Mulch shall occur only in pla t..beis in which trees ;: 'shrubs and g ou dco a plants only occur'. Mulch shall be. -2" 000th-.of NOtramu!ch -as- manufactuded.by Northwest. Cascade, Inc. '848 -2371; •[n 'Puyallup - 10 Apply Vitamin. -.E 1 root stimulator:_ to plants prix to . planting of any plta Apply tidesicant to pia is at:the nursery,' p for 'to delivery.W. site' - - - , It Spact.'gs of .11 plants 05011 be as-per the plan 'and will be . field adjusted by the-landscape contractor, with approv 12.. The correction 01 all dreinage'_problems-in all-'plant beds . and - al'l'lawn areas are part of this contract. Lo.ndscape'contractor. shall be•responsible. for establishing' appropriate grades to•assure- that all - water shall not collect in -any :plant.pits or plant beds: '13,- Any•eubstituttons, deleations, etc. `.- shall be approved only by LA Contractor shall. provide the owner, with a one. year.guarantee. an all plant materials, and. workmanship." • - . - Guarantee shall.begtn upon•final:acceptance by - Maintain all plantings ,and -. :awn' unt:i'l.final acceptance - by the LA '15. Vandalism correCtionsis. not the..responsiblity of the.. ontractor - 16. Contractor shall. provide .the LA with.72 hour riotice'on the' . :following inspections:.' ' .1'.. Preconstruc tion meeting, at ter contract signed: Inspection of fine finished grades, prior to- planting._. ' 3. Plant •materiels Inspection. 4. F1nn1 inspec tton. these inspections' are•required• .1t- is'the cOntractors responsibility to tali the' LA and scheoule a'time. 17 Do not prune any existing vegetation or new. - landscape materials without the direction of the LA - 18 See•all grading. engineering. Arch: site; and'utllity plans. • 19. All finished grades 05.11 be es per the 1j8C Code,: arid. locally ecceeted, codes. for,the distance below bi.t kliq_8ldinq.' • ALL pt7 SHALL •e:E "AS' ( lJH 'r Erie v44-0 - pi ...Or, F . -