Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-250-84 - COLUMBIA PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS - WAREHOUSEBOEING / VIESABI 306 MIDLAND DR EPIC- 250 -84 NOTICE OF ACTION Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that City of Tukwila took the action described below on December 3 , 1984. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action the grounds of non - compliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before January 13, 1985 Description of agency action: approval of a building permit. Description of proposal: 71,114 square foot office /warehouse building. Location of proposal: 306 Midland Dr. Type of environmental review under SEPA: Final Determination of Non - Significance. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the Planning Department, City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Name of agency, proponent, or applicant giving notice: City of Tukwila This notice is filed by: Rick Beeler, Associate Planner Date t ce64 Published: Record Chronicle, December 6, 1984 & December 13, 1984 cc: Applicant City Clerk Mayor Department of Ecology File NOTICE OF ACTION Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that City of Tukwila took the action described below on October , 1984. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action the grounds of non - compliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before November 29, 1984 Description of agency action: approve a building and excavation permit for a 72,000 square foot warehouse and office building and landfill permit to deposit excavated fill material on adjacent vacant lot. 6escrrpti•on- of- proposal: Location of proposal: 360 Midland Dr. Type of environmental review under SEPA: Determination of Nonsignificance was issued October 16, 1984, (EPIC- 250 -84) Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the Planning Department, City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Name of agency, proponent, or applicant giving notice: City of Tukwila This notice is filed by: Rick Beeler, Associate Planner Date October 18, 1984 Published: Record Chronicle, 'October 21 a'nd:October 28, 1984 cc: Applicant City Clerk Mayor Department of Ecology File • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE • Description of Proposal Construction of warehouse, excavation and landfill. Proponent Columbia- Pacific Constructors, Inc. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Midland Drive, west of • Andover Park West Lead Agency City of Tukwla The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS [� This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date (0— (b— Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. This determination is issued conditioned upon the attached conditions. CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DETERMINATION: 1. Soils engineer recommendations are followed. 2. Submission of revised grading, excavation and landfill plan for review and approval of City staff. 3. Provision of interim drainage controls to minimize siltation to surrounding drainage systems and properties per review and approval of the Public Works Department. r.1 TERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE• Description of Proposal Construction of warehouse, excavation and landfill. Proponent Columbia - Pacific Constructors, Inc. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Midland Drive, west of • Andover Park West Lead Agency City of Tukwla The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other.information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15, days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 10— (b— ;'f Signature 6'teLji, You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. This determination is issued conditioned upon the attached conditions. • • CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DETERMINATION: 1. Soils engineer recommendations are followed. 2. Submission of revised grading, excavation and landfill plan for review and approval of City staff. 3. Provision of interim drainage controls to minimize siltation to surrounding drainage systems and properties per review and approval of the Public Works Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 06 BLDG ( PLNG P.W. PROJECT LOCATION M1OLW \r) D DATE TRANSMITTED OCT, `Q,'C18*- II FIRE • CN- -�j EPIC 2,5( - 84- FILE POLICE n P & R STAFF COORDINATOR FILE RESPONSE REQUESTE RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Part Llr.en— Chapter 197 -11 • SEPA Rules • PART ELEVEN - FORMS RCW' 197 -11 -960 Ennironmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' 1N AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND l: Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA - PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 4. Date c > u llev upeep aWrA : 9810 8 O ctober 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months ROGER CARRUTHERS, President 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No • PI. 197 -11 RC W-, 40) (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven—I97-11-960 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be P directly a rc red, directl related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Seat.- io., 6 ve.vuirCs c, ca o.1491‘, so-iplton caF -{-;c abje ixeS cF your pwfuse( aec( elould .Ysf-b.e Sun,n, trT'Lcd Avg . USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse .. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a .person to understand the precise location of your pro- . posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. fy.opeI(( lip (,uitia ctk «rr4 desipkc*e.d o',-fi,� City Gsh,p► Ove. i�o�ic y Plo h tar aS ChNl►oh stvdt1(y st ks 1 ti v e ? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one Flat .rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% slope (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY la. 197 -11 RCV' —p 41) Part Ele,en- 197 -11 -960. • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ( c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 ' 2. 'Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or,other impacts to air, if any; All equipment will comply with OSHA Standards )Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 42) (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s).are expected to serve. None (1983 Laws) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICI. 197 -11 RCW—p 431 Part Ele+en- 197 -I1 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eclgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A]1 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been. observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 44] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c.. is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. No • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICh. 197 -11 RCR' —p I5] Part Eleten- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and laarehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g. If applicable, what is the current :shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive° area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,.if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings ICh. 197 -11 RCS' —p 46) (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules Part Eleven - 197- 11 -9E4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Does not apply - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matcrial(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing .recreational uses? If so, describe. No EVALUATION FOi AGENCY USE'O- (1963 Laws) rh. 197 -11 RC K'—p 471 Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 0 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next 10 the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describc any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. • Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? . No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift (Cis. 197 -11 RCW—p 48) (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities • a. Circle tilities current) available at the sit a ectl ricit lcc, ephon n tary sewe septic system, the Storm sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true an the lead agency is relyin Signature: . Date Submitted: mplete to the-best of my knowledge: 1 understand that o mak decisio (1983 Laws) ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 49; Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions. be aware of the extent the proposal, or the .types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases arc: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life arc: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None ICU. 197 -11 RCW—p 50) (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven-197-11-960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Does not apply 'fio(43 CI es -444- proposal Q,kTorn -. -t-c)6.tl4 Skar-el.lkut MG.sier flak , 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities - minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply Does not 8. Poes 4+t r tort( cp- d- r�t-i� pc)(r(.ieS �-{1,� IvFi c CehrrtiiestS'N'e [-044 ext.. r )1ky pia, - If so , t xa+. poi tC(f 0f-f-&.. pleb ? Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila 191-opcseci nte.Gtsores ft) t \toiot or r UC.e --L cal -((icJ ate_ Does not apply (1983 Laws) ICA. 197 -11 RCW—p 511 E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETIR ALL F�Ago glal-ARTIT PRDAIS6LS -.ehe objectives and the alternative means of reachinr .qu.e.st_i.o.as will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of . the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 101- obi Y 41. 1. What 45 the g$n -1(s) of the proposal? Does not apply • • • • - . . . • • . What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply 3 A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply • • it CE 1 t. 3 I ►mod LS �� �� p Qf p • REPORT OF GEOT£CHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED WAREHOUSE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR THE BOEING OREGON MESABI TRUST PROPERTY III 0 EP 261984 JCj 0C 10 1981 CITY C:;-' PLANNING UEP. . G `o^neineers Incort.)orcfed • • v GeoEngineers incorporated (206) 881-790C P.O. box 622_ C,onsunmo Geotecnnica; 2020 124in Ave. N.E. beuevue. WA 9E:00: cnatneers and Geoloousts Alfred H. Croonquist & Associates 1322 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Alfred H. Croonquist Gentlemen: August 31, 1984 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Warehouse Building Tukwila, Washington, for the Boeing Oregon Mesabi Trust Property III File No. 671 -01 INTRODUCTION The results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed warehouse building to be constructed for Boeing Oregon Mesabi Trust Property III in Tukwila, Washington is presented in this letter. The site is located a short distance west of Andover Parkway West on the north side of Midland Drive in the Andover Industrial Park area of Tukwila. The site is approximately 113,800 square feet in area. The building will occupy approximately 71,740 square feet and will be a dock -high concrete.tiltup warehouse structure. We understand that the floor grade will be at or about Elevation 26.5. Column loads have not been defined at this point; however, they are expected to br. typical for buildings of this structure. The building is shown with respect to adjacent features, on Figure.1. SCOPE The purpose of our services is to develop geotechnical recommendations for additional earthwork required and for design of foundations for the proposed structure. The specific scope of services includes: 1. Exploring the nature of existing fills by a series of backhoe test pits. 2. Performing a limited laboratory test program to develop information on the character of the existing fill. • • • Alfred H. Croonauist & Associates August 31, 1984 Page Two 3. Recommending the extent of any additional surcharging, both in terms of height of fill and duration of surcharging for those areas in which the site grade is presently below the planned floor grade. 4. Recommending other remedial earthwork which may be necessary to provide adequate foundation support. 5. Recommending an allowable design bearing pressure for spread footings. 6. Estimating the magnitude and rate of settlement under anticipated structural loads. SITE CONDITIONS The site grade in this portion of the Andover Industrial Park has been_raised by one or more sequences of filling. This property currently has fill over much of the building area to elevations ranging between about 27 and 30. However, the fill slopes down to as low as Elevation 23 around portions of the building perimeter so that the fill loading has not been uniform over the planned building footprint. The ground surface is covered with a growth of tall grass and occasional bushes. The fill consists principally of a mixture of silty fine and fine to medium sand with varying amounts of gravel. The fill was placed on this site after being removed from previously developed sites located to the west along Midland Drive. Occasional pieces of concrete debris were also encountered in our explorations. The fill ranges from medium dense to d e?ise at most of the locations explored. However, there are localized zones of more loose fill which occur on an irregular basis. The underlying native soils, where encountered, consist of fine sands or silts which are generally loose or soft. No ground water was observed during our test pit explorations; however, the explorations were undertaken following a long period of extremely dry. weather. It is expected that normal water table fluctuations in the area would result in ground water as high as about Elevation 20 during some periods of the year. G o7ngineers tncorporafied A 'Alfred H. Croonquist & Associates August 31, 1984 Page Three The samples obtained from the test pits were examined in our laboratory and moisture or moisture and density determinations made for correlation with information developed on adjacent job sites. These data are shown on Figure 7. CONCLUSIONS AND BECOM ENDATIONS GENERAL The configuration of the existing fill on the site is such that much of the building area has been preloaded with 3 or more feet of fill. However, g 1 1 1 1 the west, north and east perimeters of the building have not been subjected to the same amount of preloading. Therefore, an additional surcharging program is recommended to accelerate settlements in these areas so that post construction differential settlements of the structure will be minimized. Much of the existing fill is suitable for support of spread footings. We recommend, however, that the existing fill at footing grade be thoroughly compacted. Some overexcavation and replacement of these materials should be anticipated due to the variable nature of the fill indicated by our explorations. SURCHARGING PROGRAM We recommend that the surcharging program consist of. placing a berm of fill to an elevation 6 feet above planned floor grade. The limits of the area to be surcharged are shown on Figure 1. The lines shown indicate the edge of the top of the surcharge; the fill should be sloped down to the■sdjacent surface from these limits. We recommend that the surcharge extend a minimum of 5 feet beyond the edge of the building wherever possible without interference of existing rail lines or encroaching too close to adjacent structures. The surcharging program is intended to accelerate settlements to the point where postconstruction settlements of this portion of the building area will be minimized. We estimate that some 4 to 8 inches of settlement will occur under the surcharging load over a period of some 4 to 6 weeks. In order to determine the actual magnitudes of settlement and the rate of these movements, we recommend that a series of settlement markers be C-&oEnainoors V Alfred H. Croonquist b Associates August 31, 1984 Page Four installed at the locations shown on Figure 1. In addition, we recommend that reference benchmarks be established on the adjacent buildings to the west and north, as shown on Figure 1, to determine whether or not any settle- ments of these structures occur as the result of the surcharging activity. The settlement markers should be installed after stripping of the sod and proofrolling but before any additional fill is placed on the site. The markers should be estabished firmly in the existing fill surface and elevations determined with reference to a benchmark a minimum of 200 feet from the closest area of new fill placement. Observations of the elevations of the markers should be obtained three times a week during fill placement and weekly thereafter. These data should be provided to us promptly so that we can monitor the progress of fill settlements and advise when sufficient surcharging has been accomplished. - It is important that the surveyor obtaining these settlement readings maintain a record of elevations on the markers at times when it is necessary to extend the rods due to increased height of fill. Readings should be taken before and immediately after addition to any section of rod to the markers and these data reported to us. In addition, the average elevation of the fill around each marker to the nearest tenth of a foot should be reported with each settlement marker observation. EARTHWORK The site- should be stripped of all grass and sod prior to beginning earthwork. This material should be wasted off site. In areas where the ground surface is at or below final grades, we recommend that the stripped surface be thoroughly proofrolled to determine whether or not loose or soft spots exist that should be repaired prior to placement of additional fill. Filling within the building area to at least 6 inches above planned floor subgrade elevation should be accomplished by placing the fill in lifts of approximately 8 to 10 inches loose thickness and compacting it uniformly to a density equivalent to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). The on -site materials may be used if prevailing weather Geo ngineers • • Alfred H. Croonouist & Associates August 31, 198 Page Five conditions permit control of moisture content so that compaction can be achieved. The soils should generally be maintained at a moisture content within plus or minus 2 percent of optimum moisture content. The surcharge portion of the fill need be compacted only sufficiently to provide trafficability for construction equipment. The on -site soils may also be used as surcharge; we have not determined whether or not there is sufficient volume from the on -site fill to complete the surcharging. Borrow material from off -site sources, if required, should consist of clean granular soils. If earthwork is accomplished during extended dry weather, soil with a fines content (material passing the No. 200 sieve) of up to 10 or 12 percent could be used. For wet weather construction, the fines content should not exceed about 5 percent. _ A representative of our firm should be on -site during proofrolling and, as appropriate, during earthwork to determine the adequacy of subgrade preparation, the need for any remedial work within the existing fill, and to monitor and test the new fill as it is placed to determine . whether or not the specified compaction is achieved. FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed-building may be supported on spread footings founded in the existing fill. Perimeter footings should be founded a minimum of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade and interior footings, "15 inches below top of slab. It should be anticipated that a portion of the footings excavations may encounter areas where loose fills exist or, possibly, native soils are at shallow enough depth to require excavation and replacement with structural fill. Interior footings may be founded immediately beneath the floor slab on the existing and new fill placed in final grading of the site. We recommend that these footings be proportioned using a bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot. This value applies to continuous wall footings having a minimum width of 18 inches, and individual interior footings having a minimum dimension of 24 inches. All footings should be underlain by a minimum of 2 feet of fill compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). The bearing value applies to the total Geof:ng!neGrs incorporated • • Alfred 11. Croonquist & Associates August 31, 1984 Page Six of all dead plus long -term live loads excluding the weight of the footings and any overlying backfill. This value may be increased by 1/3 when considering wind or seismic loadings. We estimate that settlements of continuous wall footings will be on the order of 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch. Interior column footings supporting total design loads of 75 to 100 kips should experience between one -half and one inch of settlement. A major portion of these settlements should take place relatively rapidly following load application so that postcon- struction settlements should be 50 percent or less of the above values. Since the perimeter of much of the building area has not been loaded with fill to the same extent as the remainder, we suggest that consideration be given to erecting and bracing the wall panels for a period of one week to ten days before making final connections between panels. This will allow initial settlements to occur and minimize subsequent differential settlement along the lengths of walls. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Boeing Oregon Mesabi Trust Project . III, Alfred Croonquist Architects and your engineers for use in design of a portion of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are changes in the loads, grades, location, configuration or type Cif construction for the building, the conclusions and recommendations presented may not be applicable. If design changes are.made, we request that we be given the opportunity to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written modification or verification. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that the final design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. Geo7:ncineers • • Alfred 11. Croonquist & Associates August 31, 198; Page Seven The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifi- cally described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and also with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. The conclusions and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. JKT:da Attachments Five copies submitted Yours very truly, gineers,Anc. Jack K. Tuttle 'esident GacEngine rs 11 11 c9 J U O cc J ce m O V) (r) x w x 1 i i i 1 t 1 1 • EXISTING BUILDIN MR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TP2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • EDGE OF TOP OF SURCHARGE • • • • .44'. • • • -:• • • • • • • • 1.• • .4., • • • • 4-4• • • •,• • • .4.4: •• • • ••• • • • • • • V.v. •"• • •• • • • • • • l• PROPOSED BUILDING TP6 �TP5 Y . •,•00 n •.c.e • 00•02 _ r•s_.�s • •+-w ••• . s�w •.c+. PAVED PARKING AND STAGING AREA ._...a 0 6 :1 • • • • • • • • • • • t7 • • • .• • • 4.4 . • • • -. 4.. • . 44 • • • •� ••• •• •.• • • •, •• • • 1 ` f , • •• • -• • • • • • • • • •• • • • • •• •• - • • • • FIGURE KEY: • REFERENCE: 1 1 • 1 1 1 a i ...___________ :.9 SITE PLAN _-]t TEST PIT LOCATION AND NUMBER RECOMMENDED SETTLEMENT MARKER LOCATION RECOMMENDED SETTLEMENT REFERENCE POINT DRAWING ENTITLED "PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ", SHEET P -1 DATED £/17/84 BY ALFRED H. CROONQUIST C ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS SCALE: 1" =401 - .,- _.4.•.••••C CeoEng noors Inc. • • ,. •, • • . UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS 1 LETTER I SYMBOL I DESCRIPTIONS . - COARSE GRAINED SOILS ACM ,..w 50.4. CF RATERIAL ES aa zo`o SIEVE WE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS ,aRE Troop sox 5 caARsE FRAC- TIC D. PO. • SIEVE • CLEAN GRAVELS f to nF Da wo Flwfsl GW SLL- GRADED EliIT LE R ND FMCS Nn rnnES. LITTLE oR ND FINES GP l .tpx.Y.tr l(i ES. LIT JaVEI- SAND N•I NfTIPis. LITTLE DR ND FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES IAPPRECIABLE %+CAN► OF FINEST GM. 1 1 SILTY rEts. GRAvEL-SAND -SILT ■1mREs GG CLAYEY GFULVELS. GRAVEL -SAID -SILT RIETURES SAND AND SANDY SOILS CF C7ARSE FRAC- TIDY Etsaisa 10. • SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE: Jn PC FINEST SW NE L CAAOZD � i GRAVELLY S..a5. SP PooRtY D sA ai. GRAVELLY SANDS. LITTLE 7+ ND FI•ES SANDS WITH FINES . AP°FECIL .t ..QM IF FINEST Sly{ SILTY smoS. SNro-SILT NI T1nES SC . yVpAr +I rT1+E5 CLArEti !mos. {Z • . FINE . GRAINED SOILS ,� - ,,.,,,7 OF `TTRJ IS SILTS AND CLAYS - - - - .. LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 ML INDRGJ+(IC SILTS. AN) VERT FINE SACS. Roo, Flan. sILTY DR curry FINE sA.os DR Curry SILTS •ITv. SLIGM PLASTICITY CL imoPcmIc c11r5 OF Law To KDJLM PLASTICITY. GRAVELLY CLAYS. SANDY CLAYS. SILTY CLAYS. LEAH( CLAYS OL CPGw1C SILTS •+o c.-.+..1C SILTT CLAYS CF La( PLASTICITY SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 MH - ' 1KF+'...IC SILTS. •'ICACFCLS CP DIATJJ- • •N•..•i D. FIwE SA+O ER SILTY SILTS CH 1`Q"�•++IC�K YS CF PIGA PLASTICITY FAT Si =EVE SIX .d•• OH - .JC Curs rs <DJv. To .mm PLASTICITY. .'-'' C SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PLAT. .J4-5. *ITN 1004 �,.. s . •cTE. MAL STedCLS INDICATE EiK[RLIPE SOIL CLASSIFICATION • • GeoZngineers Enc. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE 3 DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) 0.0 - 1.) 1.5 - 5.0 5.0 - 10.0 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM SYMBOL TEST PIT ONE APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: SM SM 5M DESCRIPTION LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DRY) (FILL) BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) (FILL) GRAY AND BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH CHUNKS OF STIFF SILT (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (FILL) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 10 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED TEST PIT TWO APPROXIMATE ELEVAT ION: 0.0 - 1.4 SAM LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DRY) (FILL).. 1.4- 4.8 SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DRY) (FILL) • 4.8 - 8.5 SM GRAY FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT AND A TRACE OF GRAVEL MIXED WITH BROWN FINE SILTY SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (FILL) 8.5 - 11.0 SM GRAY AND BROWN FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT AND A TRACE OF ORGANICS (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP TO MOIST) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 11 FEET ON 8/21/84 THIN WALL SAMPLE TAKEN AT 2 FEET BAG SAMPLE TAKEN AT G FEET NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED Cooi7nr;inocrs !"P 1 TEST PIT LOGS • F ICU.. h 4 DEPTH BELOW UNIFIED SOIL GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION • (FEET) SYSTEM SYMBOL TEST PIT THREE APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: DESCRIPTION 0.0 - 1.4 S M LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DRY) (FILL) 1.4 - 3.0 SM LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (i= I'_L) 3.0 - 6.0 SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) 6.0 - 10.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (FILL ?) 0.0 - 2.0 2.0 - 6.8 TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 10 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED THIN WALL SAMPLE TAKEN AT 4.2 FEET BAG SAMPLE TAKEN AT 8.0 FEET TEST PIT FOUR APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:' .SM LIGHT.BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH • SOME GRAVEL (DENSE, DRY) (FILL) SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (F I-LL) . 6.8 - 9.3 .SM GRAY AND BROWN FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT,.GRAVEL.AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (FILL ?) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 9.3 FEET. ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED BAG SAMPLES TAKEN AT 3 FEET co TfIng% ors inc. TEST PIT LOGS FIGURE 5 DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) 0.0 - 1.8 1.8 - 4.0 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM SYMBOL TEST P I T FIVE APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: SM SM DESCRIPTION LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (DENSE, DRY) (FILL) BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (FILL) LARGE CHUNKS OF CONCRETE (2 FEET PLUS I N DIAMETER) 4.0 - 5.8 SM - GRAY WITH SOME BROWN SILTY FINE SA14D AND FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP TO MOIST) (FILL) 5.8 - 8.2 SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL ?) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 8.2 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED THIN WALL SAMPLE TAKEN AT 4 FEET BAG SAMPLE TAKEN AT 7 FEET TEST PIT SIX APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 0.0 - 1.4 Si1 LIGHT BROWN WITH SOMEGRAVELI (DENSE\E SAND DRY) (FIIL) 1.4 - 4.2 SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (DENSE, DAMP)(FILL) 4.2 - 9.1 SM BROWN AND GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (LOOSE TO VERY LOOSE, MOIST TO WET)(FILL ?) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 9.1 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED LAG SAMPLE TAKEN AT 5 FEET C-�..J©LI[ g iil!c-)9rJ flic• TEST PIT LOGS FIC;URE c, DEPTH BELOW UNIFIED SOIL GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYSTEM SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT SEVEN APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 0.0 — 1.0 SM 1.0 — 3.2 SM 3.2 — 7.2 SM 7.2 - 8.6 SM 8.6 - 9.8 ML 0.0 — 1.4 1.4 — 5.3 5.3 — 9.0 LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (DENSE, DRY) (FILL) BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (DENSE, DAMP)(FILL) GRAY WITH SOME BROWN SILTY FINESAND MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, DAMP) (FILL: DARK GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (LOOSE, MOIST) DARK GRAY FINE SANDY SILT (SOFT,WET) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 7.8 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED TEST PIT EIGHT APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: SM SM SM LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH • SOME GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES (DENSE, DRY) (FILL) BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES (DENSE, MO1ST)(FILL) GRAY AND BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES (DENSE, DAMP)(FILL) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 9.0 FEET ON 8/21/84 NO GROUND WATER OBSERVED Gcoftjincors Enc. TEST PIT LOGS r- f (U r, E 7 MOISTURE- DENS1TY DATA Test Pit Sample Moisture Dry ::o. Depth (ft.) Content (%) Density (pcf) 2 2 14.9 2 6 17.9 3 4.2 17.0 3 8 18.3 4 3 12.2 �. 4 23.0 5 7 17.2 6 5 17.7 99 108 96 GeoEngineers Epic. MOISTURE — DENSITY DATA �0.T4 OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: (] BLDG 1---1 PLNG PROJECT LOCATION M1Olk'D De P.W. CN -3'j t *PIC 25■• - 84- FILE • FIRE POLICE (l P & R FILE NO DATE TRANSMITTED OCT, l CI c [C'184. RESPONSE REQUESTE STAFF COORDINATOR 5, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT IMPACT UPON POLICE SERVICES CANNOT BE EVALUATED WITHOUT THE AVAILABILITY OF OF ADDITIONAL INFOHMATTON• 1. WHAT:PRODUCT WILL BE STORED AND DISTRIBUTED FROM BUILDING? •2. WILL TRAFFIC GENERATED BE OF COMMERCIAL OR PRIVATE CONSUMER TYPE? 3. LIGHTING QUALITY AS APPLIED TO BUILDING ANn ARFAG IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT? 4. INTERIOR /EXTERIOR ALARMS ? 5. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO WORK THEREIN.? THIS TYPE FACILITY USUALLY' CREATES MINIMUM IMPACT AND PROBLEM AREAS FOR PD. wfir DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY )11/41 C.P.S. Form 11 From Orraine Cronk Speed ,eUerlo To Pt igkras Subject Boeing Mesabi - REMOYE_ EXCESS DRAINAG FILL Oft SITE - REP )VAL NI 98 10 FOLD MESSAGE PER YOUR-REQUEST TO REVIEW REMOVAL OF EXCESS FILL ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO SURROUNDING EXISTING ELEVATIONS, I HAVE REVIEWED THE FLOOD ZONE CONTROL MAPS AND FIND THAT THIS AREA IS IN tMINIMAL FLOODING ZONE PER 100 YR. FLOODING. I see no reason at this time to deny removal of excess material, recognizing a detailed plan review by City staff has not been accomplished, including any environmental process, to date. The developer should be cautioned thatEt1pal plan review% J require a di- ferent final REPLYgrade to his plans than those shown now. Also, interim drainage controls shall be provided to control siltation to surrounding drainage systems and properties. - No 9 M No ICFOLD Date WifisonJJones GRAYLINE FORM 44- 902 3 -PART 1983 • PRINTED INU S A. Signed RECIPIENT— RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY. TURN OVER FOR USE WITH WINDOW ENVELOPE. FILL IN NAME AND ADDRESS HERE FOR RETURN IN WINDOW ENVELOPE n -FOLD -FOLD CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: El BLDG n PLNG P.W. FIRE PROJECT LOCATION NL1OY) D� DATE TRANSMITTED (:', ` Qj t61,8411- RESPONSE REQUESTE • CN -3 EPIC Z',5(-84- FILE POLICE ri P & R FILE N STAFF COORDINATOR ,w , RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE N0 Cow" ' ,,etd,r iV hi 1.4 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Part F:ir.en— Chapter 197-11 • SEPA Rules • PART ELEVEN — FORMS RCW 197 -]1 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether au EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring -preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the bat de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. writc 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answcr these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and "affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, • Tukwila 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA - PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 Be ewe, WA 98008 4. Date chec rst prepared: 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months ROGER CARRUTHERS, President 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No • la,. 197 -1I RCW-1$110) +:.�. • . (1923 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -I1 -960 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications arc pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete dcscription of your proposal, including thc proposed uses and thc size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. : Sec o" Irts c, Col script cat' -t-i, a6jr ixeS rf Your protcosc ( God cloutd Turf-b.4_ sunim USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a..person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and rangc, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not iequired to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Drje , 4 . rpop@tct lie. Wit:ia Ak drrea desif tcL*eI pi, -ft Ci^fys Campre/,.stsi L '4 Opt. 190tZt i P(o K Mar aS ehN rOkAteK4l( y, St R,1 t•i v e ? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? fd% slope EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 taws) ICA. 197 -11 RCW—p 411 Part Eleten- 197 -11 -960. • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, • describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 2. Air • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No • ^ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or_other impacts to air, if any: All equipment will comply with OSHA Standards (Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 421 (1953 Laws) • SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the arca of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) ICb. 197 -11 RCW—p 431 Part Elcben- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ,. grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil pants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ' Alil c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, hcron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None IC11. 197 -11 RCW—p 44) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c.. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise . exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -tcrm or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY IC t. 197 -11 RCW—p 45) Part Ele■en- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and 'Warehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What .is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g. If applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any Does not apply I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,.if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings . (Ch. 197 -11 RC's' —p 461 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low - income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None ,-.._. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of Tight or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No Part Eleven - 197_11_960 EVALUATION FG) AGENCY USE ON: (1983 taws) ;L !Ch. 197 -11 RCw' —p 171 Part Elocn- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. - Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? - No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift ICh. 197 -11 RCK' —p 48) • (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Ele■en -197 -11 -960 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle tilities curre ephon tl available at the sit a cell ricit rotary sewe septic system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true an the lead agency is relyin Signature: .......... Date Submitted: mplete to the-best of my knowledge: 1 understand that o mak decisio . (1983 Laws) lCh. 197 -11 RCW—p 49 Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • SEPA Rules • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPRO)ECT ACTIN'S (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marinc life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None ]Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 50] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Does not apply 11 t 4w c e 'th; prrpOSa.J QPk'Fern, 4n ik�- 106J1 c SLOrtitirt MCL5ier t"lak 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? - Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities - minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply 8. Does Ott rotate . ( . 3 ; c PIS � Does not Colfljd UJ 44 pal/C.ies cf -f1 i6■I4 COKiettkekSIX Lo If so , turtoi fOl i ut.3 of- plot? Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila 19Iopefec Atea.Sores a.\tOlot cr re-dUL€ Mt e. cDL-fl c.Jtu arm Does not apply (1983 Laws) ICA. 197 -11 RCW—p 51) E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET• 14 R ALL R elen Poo P313- PtZU 1-S Th e objectives and the alternative means of reachin .qu.es.tton& will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental_ Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. Att OWPISV44. 1. What 4s the gee -1(s) of the proposal? Does not apply S.. .. - - - - . . . . 1 . 2 A. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply 3 A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply • • FJ42 N F L -N ( L tz.(Eic �vES -C-, CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT LOCATION NLIOLNKAID t DATE TRANSMITTED (:),c', 1 0 t 1Ct84- n BLDG 11 PLNG P.W. • CN -3 EPIC 25c ■- 84- FILE FIRE POLICE P & R lr�C��S L EOORU_', STAFF COORDINATOR ,mob-- f.58 FILE NO RESPONSE REQUESTE RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR., COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT c iF cT' 1>IsZ kE . y' DATE c) )0, )9 COMMENTS PREPARED BY GLAAL1 LOLA, 4 C.P. . Form 11 Part Eleven — hapter 197 -11 SEPA Rules • • PART ELEVEN - FORMS RCW 197 -11 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring -preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question dots not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA - PACIFIC. CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 Belklevue, WA 98008 4. Date checklist prepared: 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Permit; Completion - 5 months ROGER CARRUTHERS, President Department Start as of receipt of Building 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further .activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No ICk. 197 -11 RCW—p 401 0983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Sec-i0o% vire% c, Ca►rpltit t cbje � .es es your pvogsc ( oho( %tout., "NA- .. su►Hn+ tri terf Acre. . USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse .. ... • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a .person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Doe- 4 t.. i.cper(I lip (,untie as Brea desip to*e4 04, 41,t_ City's Camp►ti,,.K..si LA,„/ Or'c. r'otic y Ro K Mar a ohste'd U y se ks i f i v e ? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL. ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General dcscription of the site (circle one )(Flat .rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% slope (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICn. 197 -11 RCW—p tll Part Eleten— I97 -I1 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, day, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: - During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 ' 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or_othcr impacts to air, if any: All equipment will comply with OSHA Standards JCtt. 197 -11 RCW—p 42J (1953 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. if appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would •be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 laws) (Cb. 197 -11 RCW—p 431 Purl Elden- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture i _ crop or gr in _ wet soil pf ants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b.' What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Ala c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • None d. Proposed 'landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered spccies known to be on or near the site. None Ia. 197 -11 RCW—p 44) ( 19133 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources • a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation'standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk . of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise . 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -tcrm or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY jC . 197 -11 RCW—p 451 Part Ele■en- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and laarehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g: if applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,.if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings ICI. 197 -11 RCW—p 46J (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven---197-11-90 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of Light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FGa AGENCY USE ON:- 1Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 471. Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. :Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property , f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 481 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleben- 197 -11 -960 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts; if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle tilities current] ephon available at the sit nitary sewe septic system, _efectricit water refuse serv- Storm sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might ' be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true an,w the lead agency is relyin: = -,„01'' m Signature:. . Date Submitted: mplete to the-best of my knowledge: 1 understand that o mak decisio . /% (1983 Laws) ICR. 197 -11 RCW—p 19; Part Elelen- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPRO)ECT ACTIONS, (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None 1Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 501 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Lars) • SEPA Rules Part Ele■en- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and and use impacts are: Does not apply .6(,..3 does proposo.1 mk'Eern, 4 4"&e.. tJI 4 Sk ore.!, b e M oSte► R ek; 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities - minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply Does not 8. paves -At r°f °rc ( tic. id— c t c- es cf f1Q- i14.4.1(14 C6P pre%ertsixt. Lae4 txr.. potzu, 1914 If so , µ a'� pol �U�3 of pioh ? Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila pt- opcsec tit e.Gt„svres to a\1o1 of or re uc_e_ -Txe._ col4(ic ) are Does not apply (1983 Laws) ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 51) E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET. ALL ACTF Iett9 FOX) P313-frACI Pr 3LS - Because-the objectives and the alternative means of reachiii .qua.stios will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What 5 the gecl(s) of the proposal? Does not apply • - • - . . . . II • • What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply :. 3 A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply ilr Cam_ • CiA- 1 ' S ON A(,1.R pc CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM T0: ri BLDG PROJECT PLNG P.W. FIRE • CN 64-3'5 EPIC -25-1C■. - 84- FILE 11 POLICE R LOCATION MtOL D D DATE TRANSMITTED C.107, t, tCl841F • STAFF COORDINATOR ,(3,._ fS, FILE NO RESPONSE REQUESTE RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Part Eleven -- Chapter 197 -11 SEPA Rules • 40 PART ELEVEN - FORMS RCW 197 -11 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether so EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring •preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit-this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and "affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND •. , I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila • 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: . ROGER CARRUTHERS, President COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 Bellevue, WA 98008 4. Date c u ist prepared: 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further . activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No . (19133 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleten- 197 -I1 -960 • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications arc pcnding for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. .. . SeGat'4O' .. tuires c, ca hole l". your pwws41 aka( clouid • b'. sun+M tri teal USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse d c Script-ton • ... • f -t- e. a b)edNty rf 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. O 44% rer let lie_ (.UttUa ak «kVA desikkafed pi.4ie City Gsoftpre.l,aksN L.a• Use 19O1Zc v PLo K Mar a ekvi,ohrtvdtli se as 1 f ► ¥ e ? i Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Eartb • a. General description of the site (circle one Flat :rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 91% slope (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 41) Part Elelen- 197 -11 -960. • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 2. -Air • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No • ^r c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any; All equipment will . comply with OSHA Standards ICh. 197 -11 RC1V' —p 421 (1983 Laws) ......... None AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) 10%. 197 -11 RC:4' —p 43) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eclgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None ICI. 197 -11 RC1W' —p 441 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • TO RE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noisc would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 45) Part'Eloen- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and 'Warehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g. If applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any Does not apply I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,.if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings tCb. 197 -11 RCW—p 461 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven-197-1]-96i) • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low - income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare-may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FGt AGENCY USE ONL lCh. 197 -11 RCW-p 47) Part Elden- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. •Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? if not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? . No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None c. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate whcn peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift [Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 481 (1983 Laws) ....... • SEPA Rules • Part Ele■en- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities • a. Circle tilities curre tl available at the sit a ectJ ricit ICe, ephon nitary sewe septic system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true a the lead agency is relyin Signature: Date Submitted: mplete to the-best of my knowledge: I understand that o mak decisio (1983 Laws) (CN. 197 -11 RC14' —p 49; Part Eleten- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • SEPA Rules • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the .types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does riot apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 50j EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Does not apply t �}- / ,t {r� 'tiow c(CeS -i+tt rrt poso t �k.Cot -n, 4 � o6;ti Sehetjk'c i�4s ler flak -; 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities - minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) arc: Does not apply 7. identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply Does not 8. ()cies t Pp'°fert ( c -F(;d- 0.t-kl pafic.ies ce-f>~� i136■14 Catxprelteks■•c -e Act O. pvti cy f [41 % If so , IUkQT pot ;c 1t.1 of-t& pistil 7. Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila pl'oreseci '.teCesures + GlAcojot or re-ilk/Le- - it_ co&-((ic3r ctre_ 6. Does not apply (1983 Laws) ICI. 197 -11 RCW- -, S11 E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET 1, ALL ACT�OP b /emu" Pt2U t- S e objectives and the alternative means of reachin ` .qu es i.oas will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of . the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. art ob5v s 1. What 4-s the gee (s) of the proposal? Does not apply What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply 3 A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply oNs psyjo Fbe- NtLue ta\Li-Nt okRks CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT BLDG (LNG P.W. • CN- -�� EPIC - 84 FILE FIRE ( ( POLICE LOCATION M1QL. ID D DATE TRANSMITTED Oct', `Q! [Ct8+ STAFF COORDINATOR g, f5, P & R FILE NO RESPONSE REQUESTE RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Part Eleven -- Chapter 197 -11 • SEPA Rules • • PART ELEVEN - FORMS RCW 197 -] 1 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMEI.TAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether as EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring •preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects: The agency to which you submit thins checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROIECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA - PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ROGER CARRUTHERS, President COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 Be1levue, WA 98008 4. Date checklist prepared: 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further . activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 197 -11 RCW- -4 401 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven - 197 -11 -960 • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications are pcnding for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this ppage. SeCzi0rt 6. Vetuirti ct Co onto( e. e_ dCSCPifrho, f' -t-i,e. abje NeS of your pwws4( ahot cloutd ref b.4_ sum.% tri Z. 4 f,ve . USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse .. • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a..person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 0Qe.% -{';t_ r,orsieI lie.. wtttitt QM crea desipko'+ed oti4te. Citys CssMpre“a &`c'e 1l+ «1 Use tootit.y P10 N Mee aS ►ohnte•Cie Y se its 1 }i v t ? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one other :rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% slope EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 411 Part Ele%en- 397 -11 -960 • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill existing 41. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts 10 the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 ' 2. Air • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or_other impacts to air, if any; All equipment will comply with OSHA Standards ICI. 197 -11 RCK' —p 421 (1983 Laws) •SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200•feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served .(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. ......... None Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) 1Cb. 197 -11 RCW—p 431 Part Elden- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain . _ wet soil pants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b.' What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Alil c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (Ch. 197 -11 RC14'—p 44) (1963 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise . 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -tcrm or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 45j Part Eleven- 197 -I1 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and laarehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What.is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ,J . Do not know g: If applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any Does not apply I. Proposcd measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,.if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings (Cb. 197 -11 RCW—p 461 (1983 Laws) SETA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No Part Eleven- 197- II -90) EVALUATION FCI AGENCY USE ONL' (1983 Laws) :. IC11. 197 -11 RC 4'—p 171. Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing .roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift ICh. 197 -11 RCK' —p 48) (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleten- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transi5ortation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle tilities currentl ephon available at the sit rotary sewe septic system, e ectricit refuse serv- Storm sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true an the lead agency is relyin Signature: . Date Submitted: mplete to the-best of my knowledge: I understand that o make 'decisio (1983 Laws) ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 19; Part Elelen- 197 -11 -960 • SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FO NONPROJECT ACTIONS. (do not use this sheet for protect-actions- Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the.types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life arc: None' 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None ICI. 197 -11 RCW—p 50) alp (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts arc: Does not apply does 44; pnposa( mkFern, 4n 4e- Mc et. Vt ek 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? - Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities- minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply Does not 8. /oes �1 ^t p ov°rt ( cp ..E( .0 4' �tft -t e s cf fi - K�+1 14 CostKerek eh.5∎Nct Lak4 O. Pc)(k)f f L41 - if se , dta+ Pot lc.lc3 dF -f-64_ picot?. Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila ?Forofecl 1tectsures ct■toloi at- re-JULe._ col-t1i L are_ Does not apply (1983 Laws) Ia. 197 -11 RCW' —p 511 E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET ALL F�hoo gla1104J016 PR t S S ' he objectives • . -•- and the alternative means of reachin1t �- `- .qu.esticlas will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What 45 the gee -1(s) of the proposal? Does not apply ... What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply 3 • A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply / pcyj LL FeNe \cLue oeks Part Eleven --- Chapter 197 -11 • SEPA Rules • PART ELEVEN — FORMS RCW 197 -11 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether au EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of sand. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse,impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply." IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROIECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project,' 'applicant," and "property or site should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND • FROSTS OCT 10 1984 CITY OF l u6,vI+LA PLANNING DEPT._ 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ROGER CARRUTHERS, President COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 Be evue, WA 98008 4. Date checklist prepared: 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No (C4. 197 -11 RCW —p 401 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. .. : SeCZkok V't tu r e-5 cc your praft,s4( aka( c(ou(d wri-b.& sun+m 4ri'Ltd titre . USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse Car„pl �. .. .. • • drsc- iptten C) . abje,di'es of 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Q. -Kt.. !worse se ( tie (.0 it 14 ak 60'" diaSitkafe.d pti -Fic. City's GSmpr tks?' a L.ekit Opt. I9otic y PLO N Mee ICS ekNiroktsivtlaIt y St ks i f i'1 e? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one other olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% slope (1983 Laws) lCh. 197 -11 RCW—p 41) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY . c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: All equipment will comply with OSHA Standards la. 197 -11 RCW—p 421 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year –round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 –year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) ICb. 197 -11 RCW—p 43) Part Eleven - 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: . Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs g grass — pasture _ crop or grain — wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other — water plants: water lily, eelgrass; milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None [Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 441 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (1983 Laws) Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 45] Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and warehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 461 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules Part Eleven - 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No (1983 Laws) [Ch. 197 -11 RCV1' —p 47] Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet,G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift 1Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 48J (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 –I1 -960 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle tilities currentl available at the sit Ice, septic system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are tr the lead agency is relying Signature: Date Submitted: complete to t of my knowledge. I understand that /0 GP 8 (1983 Laws) (Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 491 Part Eleven - 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it maybe helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the.types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. • I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None (Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 50J ' EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Does not apply cw c nes 44_ prnposa.(. a�k'Fcrv►� cio 4kt_ 1-66,,Jur, t1 ..aPck't Olitasie► ttat.t 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? ., Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities = minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply Does not S• (des 6-c ercrrc( cokffic t.0 4 po &qes cE-fL k v Canker ziteftsr•c•e Lk4 ();C R. tcy PE4k - if so , tukai- po<<u�S of --fi, rLc Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila pFopaseci ntecisures a∎ oIot or r UL.e --i cnk.-((ic (s) are_ Does not apnly-' (1983 Laws) (Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 511 ! ! E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL I4Ei-i -Ottt Ps�n Neu "fl' ' Pr?. t S e objectives and the alternative means of reachini .questions will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. arc obiv 1. What 4s the gee-1(s) of the proposal? Does not apply • - _ _ . . • 1 . 2 A. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply '3 ik. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT LOCATION BLDG PLNG MtOLPstAD D P.W. FIRE •CN —�jt EPIC 25-C• 84 FILE POLICE P & R 40LS's". Leioonu_., DATE TRANSMITTED , I(21 Vi841F RESPONSE REQUESTE STAFF COORDINATOR, f5, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Part Ejt.en —.0 bapter 197 -11 • SEPA Rules • PART ELEVEN - FORMS RCW 197 -11 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMEP?AL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: ogm OCT 0 1984 ITY F Ttjt(Vili_A C p ommiNC DE ?T. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not ap- ply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Somc questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,•the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit pis checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site" should be read as "proposal,' 'proposer," and "affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: New Distribution Building, Upland Drive, Tukwila t- 2. Name of applicant COLUMBIA - PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ROGER CARRUTHERS, President COLUMBIA- PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. P.O. Box 7177 4. Date c iec11k11esvuee, p arWA d : 98008 10 October 1984 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start as of receipt of Building Permit; Completion - 5 months 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No ICV 197 -11 RCW -.p401 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. General Construction Building Permit & related specialty permits (mechanical, electrical, etc.) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section lc. v �uirCs ct CaMpl e_ deScriptt ., oe 1 v a13je ixeS of YOU 1:YUfb) SG. ( aho( cleulcl nclf b.41- SUritM tri'Ltd c.* c_ . USE: Distribution Warehouse BUILDING: 71,910 SF SITE: 143,626 SF One -Story Tilt -up Concrete Warehouse • ... • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a .person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Doe.% e- I r:c1 !ie.. Gultfia QM arra -e. City GsMp►el.ksi 1.4i4 !?obey pia h Liar aS eh\clrohntedr1( y st ks i { i v e ? Not to our knowledge See attached site plan with legal description TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one )(Flat :rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% slope (1983 Laws) ICA. 197 -11 RCW—p 411 Part Ele +en- 197 -11 -960 SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Remove +/- 500 CY of preload fill, existing f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, sedimentation control is required. Installation of permanent storm drainage system. See attached Drawing, C -1 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal - exhaust from construction equipment b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or,other impacts to air, if any; All equipment will comply .with OSHA Standards ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 421 (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would -be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Do not know 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . ..; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served .(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s).are expected to serve. None (1983 Laws) AGENCY USE ONLY (Ch. 197 -11 RCW—p 43) Part Elden- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT SEPA Rules • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See attached Drawing, C -1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _x. grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass; milfoil, other other tYP4s of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape plan submitted for City approval 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 411 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Gas - heat Electric - lighting b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulated to meet energy conservation standards 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Police & Ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) ICU. 197 -11 RCW—p 451 Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • SEPA Rules • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent properties are used for offices and 'Warehouse. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do not know g. If applicable, what is the current'shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 to 30 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed building matches the usage of adjacent buildings 1Cb. 197 -11 RCW—p 461 (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • _ Part Eleven- 197- 11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low - incomc housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26' clear height building; concrete tilt -up panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Clare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What .designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No EVALUATION FO AGENCY USE ONL' (1983 Laws) lt:h. 197 -11 RCK' —p 171 Part Eleven - 197 -1I -960 SEPA Rules • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or ,local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or 'next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Upland Drive to the North Midland Drive to the South Access off of Midland Drive, see Sheet G -1 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One (1) city block. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 82 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether . public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Railroad right -of -way on West side of property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes would occur at beginning and end of shift ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 481 (1983 Laws) • SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. General area covered at present time b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle tilities curre ephon tl available at the sit nitary sewe septic system, the Storm sewer efectricit refuse serv- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above - will hook -up to existing utilities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true an the lead agency is relyin Signature:. . Date Submitted: mplete to the`best of my knowledge: 1 understand that o mak decisio ./ (1983 Laws) la. 197 -11 RC'W —p 19; Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS SEPA Rules (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because thesc questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. L How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not worry 2. How would the proposal be likely 'to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not affect any of the above Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would. the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, . historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 501 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules • Part Eleven- 197 -11 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts arc: Does not apply Aczbui does 4.114_ OrnpoSQl cokcarn, 4 e._ - 0 6.Juct s t[ii e Mc /d e► u ak 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? - Transportation - minimal Public Services - minimal Utilities minimal Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply 8. Pi-s 4A -t. profoic (kc policy Ptak ? cp E t £,ul-M pa(IC.l e S If so , poi iues of--tt _ pl4h Does not C6 rc.iestSIK-t La 4 Site has been zoned by City of Tukwila e-opo ec rke&so eS ot Or re4UC.e. Cpl' tide oche_ Does not apply (1983 Laws) ICh. 197 -11 RCW—p 511 6,e33-cal S E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL R£it6tQg Awn N313-friAr PtZn � e objectives and the alternative means of reachin` .question will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. a►c objev a 1. What 4-s the gee-1(s) of the proposal? Does not apply • .• ••. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does not apply • 3 A. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the prefered course of action: Does not apply • • P's\IPIIL-N3LR- Fes, \lcJe Ln Q Mr. Rick Beeler CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Seattle, WA 98188 RE: NEW DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BOEING OREGON MESABI TRUST PROPERTY III TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Beeler: • Columbia- Pacific Constructors Inc. General Contractors 10 October 1984 i.. \OCT 10 1984 Please find enclosed for your review a copy of the completed SEPA Rules, Environmental Checklist RCW 197 -11 -960 for the above referenced project, including soils report, legal description, site plan and permanent storm drainage plan. In the event of a Declaration of early notification of same. Please contact the undersigned, information. cc: G. J. Colin Larry Prescott Enclosures RC /pl Significance, we respectfully request should you require any additional Very truly yours, COLU A- PACIF„ ONSTRUCTORS, INC. ident ARRUTHERS 13680 N.E. 16th Street • Bellevue, WA 98005 • 643-3060 7433 5th Ave. S. • Seattle, WA 98108 • 767 -3810