Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-253-84 - PEARL ALVIN - WAREHOUSE ADDITIONPEARL BUILDING 405 BAKER BLVD EPIC- 253 -84 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE* Description of Proposal Construction of 8220 square foot warehouse addition. Proponent Alvin Pearl Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 405 Baker Boulevard Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-25384 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible ufficial Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date I — — g S Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM •CN d t4-`40"I EPIC .2531q `7 FILE TO:[ BLDG PLNG n P.W. 1 FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT atavi 6W(elIJ1 LOCATION Y195 45Ctb / DATE TRANSMITTED /.2-40 -514 STAFF COORDINATOR OGI(j 5c11.141...„ THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. d. FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /2/7-51q RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT DATE /A. --/ D COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CZTY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 1 1 BLDG PLNG PROJECT I2 z»// e4 "1din LOCATION djr 45(,(,,% k ei DATE TRANSMITTED '17/0461 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR APJ CJ , THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. P.W. FIRE "ION EPIC FILE POLICE P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE RECEIVED DATE ! 2 . - 2 -- 8 . COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • • \2_ -22 2S3 ,CITY._.OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG PLNG P.W. Vrf IRE PROJECT atat/J 6U)(eij7 LOCATION 1405 602121) (4 DATE TRANSMITTED 11-40 414 STAFF COORDINATOR g/CJ& • CN EPIC FILE 14-1/0 .�s3 -8y POLICE I P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY I217 s'y RESPONSE RECEIVED l )2.a T THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT MAMA DATE 1__- COMMENTS PREPARED BY. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 0 BLDG PLNG (—j P.W. (1 FIRE L POLICE [ 1 P & R PROJECT atom 66(j/dm LOCATION 1415 45�AA) d DATE TRANSMITTED 1F10111 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY / 217- -'y STAFF COORDINATOR gic4t1 RESPONSE RECEIVED )1- D -e CN FLl -140t4 EPIC .2531q `i FILE FILE NO. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT The information contained in'the JnvironmentaI-Checklist is insuffiriPnt to permit a creditab e✓iinpact upon police - services. The commodity to be DATE warehoused,if it is going to generate high traffic levels, does it present •a security risk, etc. On the basis of the contained information I.see no heavy impact on police services. 1Z/17/84 COMMENTS PREPARED BY PJL C.P.S. Form 11. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG k PLNG P.W. PROJECT a& 9.4 l iteibi LOCATION 1.1 76' 6()00JJ) d DATE TRANSMITTED I.7 -10 -1q STAFF COORDINATOR $'C-/& FIRE CN EPIC FILE 8 -uoN 253-8 y FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 12174q RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE ja- //y .T40 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 -- CI - -TY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • �CN 04-1-10"I EPIC .253-3q FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: r6 BLDG H PLNG 6 P.W. (� FIRE [- POLICE (P & R PROJECT atom (elm LOCATION If 05 45r, Ju 6 . FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 040414 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /2 1 7 P y RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR , . a./ ilethit, THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: facEivlA c►n °F Tub Dv..0 1 SBA The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to . your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you -plan, to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. ' Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • Control No. Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. up g A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Pearl Building (previously Ayerst Building) 2. Name of applicant: Mr. Alvin Pearl 3. Address -and phone number of applicant and contact person: Al Pearl (454 -2626) & Don Miles (641- 1462); 405 Baker Blvd., Tukwila, WA 4. Date checklist prepared: November 30, 1984 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction Jan. 4, 1985 or on issuance of building permit. Completion in 90 days. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This work is an addition shown on the original 1965 plans, thus previously planned for. Possible further interior redecoration and wall adjustments. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed,for your proposal. City of Tukwila building permit and assorted utilities permits as required for addition /remodel. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat -- previously filled and graded. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? C 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Imported gravel fill. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source Of fill. Additional gravel to adjust building and parking lot grade to achieve proper drainage. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Building - 42% Asphalt - 36% Landscaping - 22% • , • Ev;aluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Protection of existing drainage structures with filter fabric to prevent siltation. Very little runoff expected. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction rliist or nrinrs, existing auto fumes_ Minimal increase in long -term emissions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: i) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No - site previously filled to recommended floor elevation. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground:. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Building is presently on sewer - no additional restrooms are planned. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. per city .1 - - • II from an area equivalent to the new impervious surfaces being constructed Kroof and parking lot addition), retained at a 10 -year storm level, and released into existing catch -basin system at a 10 -year rate. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally/describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Construct collection system and restrict outflow in accordance with City of Tukwila Engineer requirements. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Evaluation for Agency Use Only deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation (including various landscape plants) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass will be taken away; some plants will be moved. Additional landscape plants will be relocated. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • Evaluation for' Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A mix of existing. native, and import plants will make up proposed landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbi, other: Very few mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Possibly flown over. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None, except ac-di tiana1 1 anriscane species • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical - light and heat presently. Gas - future heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Additional i nsiil ati on to he installed_ 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police and fire protection 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None known Evaluation for . Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None known 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary increase in noise during construction, but no long -term increase expected. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Office /warehouse b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Possibly. prior to 1960. c. Describe any structures on the site. An existing 6,600 s.f. office /warehouse meeting zoning requirements. 1965 plans indicated plans to expand. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CM If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not required 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: To be built within code requirements. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for . Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None - N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 20' + b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Repair and maintenance of vacant building and landscaping. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No additional windows or light r: opased._ b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? City provides parks. Commercial recreation facilities. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None = N/A • Evaluation for , Agency Use Only • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NSA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Accesses Baker Boulevard. Routes to either I -405 or I -5 on major arterials. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No 12 blocks west c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Provides 20 (increasing from present 11) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing,roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so; generally describe. Some goods may arrive by air but the majority by truck /trailer. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 30; majority are employees arriving and departing. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: No increase or impacts expected over what has existed in the past. 15. Public Services Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No additional services e pecred. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public'services, if any. Building will be sprinklered. assisting fire protection. • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently ectrici , natural c efephone. an ttaary s sep is sys em, presently all but gas are being used. available at the • Evaluation for Agency Use Only site: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Install gas service; connect 8" water to fire protection; all other services already exist. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Don Miles Phone 641 -1462 15828 S.E. 24th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Storm water retention and release. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No effect Proposed measures. to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Nothing sperific- 0 Evaluation for . Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No effect Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Convert some electric heat to more efficient gas heat; provide additional insulation. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No effect Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No effect • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: None How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Very minimal. Perhaps additional water reserve for emergency fire - fighting. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts expected. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 410 Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proiect proposes the construction of an already planned (1965) warehouse building. Additional upgrading of the existing building will also occur. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Move business to another location. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Owner has located in Tukwila to be situated in an area which accomodates his business requirements. Building the already - planned addition best suits the Owner's course.