Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-256-85 - NORTHWEST IMPORT AND DISTRIBUTION - TRUCK TERMINALNORTHWEST IMPORT AND DISTRIBUTION TRUCK TERMINAL 4475 S. 134T" ST. EPIC 256 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal truck terminal Proponent Northwest Import and Distribution Corp. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 4475 S. 134th St. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 256 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Address Date 1 -2-4--25 Phone 433 -1845 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Rall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. OFFICIAL. NOTICE NOTICE IS GIVEN UNDER SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075, THAT THE CITY OF TUKWILA TOOK THE ACTION DESCRIBED IN (2) BELOW ON (DATE) January 24, 1985 • 1. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION MUST BE COMMENCED WITHIN ten DAYS PURSUANT TO (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila Municipal Code ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHAL- LENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON — COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER NOTICE; NO LATER THAN February 24, 1985 . ALL APPEALS SHOULD .BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ROOM E609, 516 THIRD AVENUE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98104 (344- 2530). ANY PERSON DESIRING TO RAISE SEPA ISSUES BY JUDICIAL APPEAL MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO DO SO WITH THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL OF THE ACTING AGENCY, Bradley J. Collins WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMMENCING ACTION SET BY (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila Municipal Code • 2. DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY ACTION: approval of a conditional use permit 85 -01 -CUP subject to conditions 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (IF NOT COVERED BY (2)): Operation of a . truck .terminal . at. 4475 S. 134th St.. as specified in the rPrnrd Pstabl i shed in the permit application- 4. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (A SUFFICIENT DESCRIPTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO LOCATE THE SITE, IF ANY., BUT A COMPLETE LEGAL DE- SCRIPTION IS NOT REQUIRED): 4475 S. 134th St, 5. TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SEPA (INCLUDE NAME AND DATE OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS): Determination of Nonsignificance issued January'24, 1985 6.- DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS AT (LOCATION, INCLUDING ROOM NUMBER, IF ANY): Planning Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA J'�W S City of Tukwila z ▪ 6200 Southcenter Boulevard o Tukwila, Washington 98188 ;1908 Deanna L. Pitts Northwest Import &Distribution Services, Inc. 625 First Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 OFFICIAL. NOTICE NOTICE IS GIVEN UNDER SEPA, RCW 43.2.C.075, THAT THE CITY OF TUKWILA TOOK THE ACTION DESCRIBED IN (2) BELOW ON (DATE). January 24, 1985 1. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION MUST BE COMMENCED WITHIN ten DAYS PURSUANT TO (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila Municipal Code ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHAL- LENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON — COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER NOTICE; NO LATER THAN February 24, 1985 ALL APPEALS SHOULD 'BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ROOM E609, 516 THIRD AVENUE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98104 (344- 2530). ANY PERSON DESIRING TO RAISE SEPA ISSUES BY JUDICIAL APPEAL MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO DO SO WITH THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL OF THE ACTING AGENCY, Bradley J. Collins WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMMENCING ACTION SET BY (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila Municipal Code . . 2. DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY ACTION: approval of a conditional use permit 85 -01 -CUP subject to conditions 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (IF NOT COVERED BY (2)): Operation of a .truck .terminal . at. 4475 S. 134th St., as specified in the 1 -. 1 1' •- 111 4, LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (A SUFFICIENT DESCRIPTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO LOCATE THE SITE, IF ANY, BUT A COMPLETE LEGALIDE- SCRIPTION IS NOT REQUIRED): 4475 S. 134th St. 5. TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SEPA (INCLUDE NAME AND DATE OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS): Determination of Nonsignificance issued January 24, 1985 6. DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS AT (LOCATION, INCLUDING ROOM NUMBER, IF ANY): Planning Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Mr. & Mrs. Allan E. Merkle 4426 S. 136th St. Seattle, WA 98168 OFFICIAL .NOTICE NOTICE IS GIVEN UNDER SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075, THAT THE CITY OF TUKWILA TOOK THE ACTION DESCRIBED IN (2) BELOW ON (DATE) January 24, 1985 1. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION MUST BE COMMENCED WITHIN ten DAYS PURSUANT TO (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila Municipal Code ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHAL- LENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON — COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER NOTICE; NO LATER THAN February 24, 1985 . ALL APPEALS SHOULD .BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ROOM E609, 516 THIRD AVENUE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98104 (344- 2530). ANY PERSON DESIRING TO RAISE SEPA ISSUES BY JUDICIAL APPEAL MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO DO SO WITH THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL OF THE ACTING AGENCY, Bradley J. Collins WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMMENCING ACTION SET BY (STATUTE OR ORDINANCE) Tukwila. Municipal Code 2. DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY ACTION: approval of a conditional use permit 85 -01 -CUP subject to conditions '3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (IF NOT COVERED BY (2)): Operation of a.truck.terminal. at.4475 S.. 134th St.. as specified . in the relord established in 'the permit aRp]ication: 4. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (A SUFFICIENT DESCRIPTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO LOCATE THE SITE, IF ANY, BUT A COMPLETE LEGAL DE- SCRIPTION IS NOT REQUIRED): 4475 S. 134th St. 5. TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SEPA (INCLUDE NAME AND DATE OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS): Determination of Nonsignificance issued January 24, 1985 6. DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS AT (LOCATION, INCLUDING ROOM NUMBER, IF ANY): Planning Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Ms. Joanne Poireir 13405 42nd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 "CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 4 CN jrS OV5 EPIC � Z -�f5 FILE • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG E] PLNGW. [l FIRE n POLICE fl P & R PROJECT ` 1'.? W .141vt -12OY+ LOCATION 1-1q75 5, /(d /L' *Of RESPONSE . REQUESTED BY ! %718y DATE TRANSMITTED FILE NO. • STAFF COORDINATOR 'Kip U/0J RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE. REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART - MENT. THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL. PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. No C l rnWlt�si DATE 1 / I Si S3� COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN j.r5 -6705" EPIC . FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: (i BLDG LNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT •`'f W 14'i c'-E LOCATION LJLI7S j, /'3 4' y/11, FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED �" /� RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /47/?(/ STAFF COORDINATOR 42)C)6 Val j RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS CEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW. TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. .ITEM COMMENT DATE /CJ COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 CITY• OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN b5-QaS EPIC 25-&-5-- FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG n PLNG P.W. n FIRE n POLICE P& R PROJECT `''r) W 1,4144710-y4 LOCATION L1L475 i. /SS(d• yaf, FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED /kg/Y. - RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1/4-71?(/ STAFF COORDINATOR' `12,/d () V► \CU 64' RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS CEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE I— "/7 ----K $ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 5 -ohs EPIC 2527 -'5 FILE 5C*CLUO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG (n PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT "11 -141/11007r+ LOCATION LJ1-175 5. OW , FILE. NO. DATE TRANSMITTED Oglyff- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1 1/47/?(/ ,� ff'' STAFF COORDINATOR Cf,�"rr�Uti L/10.1 RESPONSE RECEIVED -THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS. CEIVED•REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW-FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART -MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH ''CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. • DATE / �•�� ��. COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • EPIC5 �S EPIC 23"�• FILE • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 0 BLDG ED PLNG (i P.W. (i FIRE OLICE P & R PROJECT `11(,() 1/Yv42c+ LOCATION -I L175 5. /SWIL- yal, DATE TRANSMITTED 014/515- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 17lS(/ =STAFF . COORDINATOR' JGk& Lii, ) RESPONSE RECEIVED FILE NO. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS CEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW 70 ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION.' .THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART - .MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE. ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT The lack of full information on this project makes evaluation and comment DATE difficult at best. My understanding is the the requesting party intends moving into an'.existing facility and utilizing the.space for receiving, breaking down and trans- shipping.importeditems. While 'any change in warehouse-asset and its illicit'marketability value increases.criminal'interest and therefore impacts .on police patrol patterns the insufficiency of information relative to the product to be.warehoused preclude any reliable judgement on the impact. Six :_tatEight trucks loading and "unloading daily will have a minimum effect but -'of concern is the number of employees and possibly - potential customers who ,may access the property -on a-daily basis.. To provide for a maximum of security and "a better evaluation of police service needs, :the requestee should contact the City of Tukwila, Crime Prevention Office. at 433 -1822 or coordinate through the City Planning Official. 1/15/85 COMMENTS PREPARED BY PJL C.P.S. Form 11 C-TTY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 15-00_5- EPIC 25,— 5 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG fl PLNG fl P.W. (FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT `-r) W J4&-2C+ LOCATION L1N75 .5. /SW 01 FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED . +_� ..` /414h5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 07/?() STAFF COORDINATOR •' jCk.' (J,'O) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS CEIVED• REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 00. (' ;a :ea Lrito x(92 geaM. n4u 'f7d ozi t •Y,vht --woxIct lO 1,/i4 can 4) -/-va,0, ,kt ty'rt A,t) Mip is L c - Ka& L N/1-- -- m o L4112 72 WJ y d1,4 //a DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P. . Form 11 • 4 l A 19 08 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND HEARING OF THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the 24th day of January, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and place for: P lic Hearing: 85 -01 -CUP: Northwest Import and Distribution Corp., requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a truck terminal in an existing building at 4475 S. 134th Place. Public Meetings: DR -1 -85: NW Volvo White Truck Center, requesting approval of plans for an outside storage area at 14000 Interurban Avenue South. DR -2 -85: Hampton Inn, requesting approval of plans for a 4 -story hotel west of West Valley Highway at S. 158th Street. Any and all interested persons are invited to attend. Published: Record Chronicle, January 11, 1985 Distribution: File Mayor City Clerk Adjacent Property Owners City of Tukwila .6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 r DELI UNABLE TO YJ3 ,O °tT URN TO 'VP, i iE 1 • GROW WITH US IN THE LAND OF THE HAZELNUTS Fostoria Park Assoc. 900 4th Ave. Suite 4120 Seattle, WA 98164 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Becky L. Kent Hereby declare that: ® Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit 0 was mailed to each of the following addresses on January 9, `_ ,19 -85. See attached list. Name of Project 8S -01 -CUP File Number Northwest Import & Dist. NW Import 4475.5. 134th Pl. Seattle, WA 98168 Attn: Deanna Pitts Edith Borden 4319 S. 135th Seattle, WA 98168 Paula & Karl Shelton 13517 43rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Beulah M. Schwartz 13507 43rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Carl 0. Lee 13435 43rd So. Seattle, WA 98168 David Sackett 13429 43rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Joseph 0. Menard 13425 42nd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Konrad & Joanne M. Poirier 13405 42nd Ave. S. Unit #1 Seattle, WA 98188 Elisabeth Springer 13325 42nd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Lucus & Pupo & World Tire Co. 4435 S. 134th P1. Tukwila, WA 98180 Frank Jorson 13136 42nd S. c., + +1 o WA QQ1 FR AiLbstoria Park Assoc. 0 4th Ave. Suite 4120, Seattle, WA 98164 Kenneth D. Rozum • 4420 So. 136th St. Seattle, WA 98168 Continental Lime Inc. Gordon R. Hunter United Construction Supply Div. 4345 So. 135th St. 18298 Andover Park West Seattle, WA 98168 Tukwila, WA 98188 David N. Kollogg 21026 80th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 EB Halvorson & FR Lindell 5035 189th N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Gerald M. Mcless 4512 So. 135th Seattle, WA 98168 Elmer W. Manning PO Box 6232 Federal Way, WA 98003 Robert Merkle 4515 S. 135th Seattle, WA 98168 Dale A. Shawley 4433 So. 135th Seattle, WA 98168 Doris M. Burnett 4536 So. 135th Seattle, WA 98444 William C. Hall 17522 13th S.W. Seattle, WA 98166 Allan E. Merkle 4426 S. 136th St. Seattle. WA 98168 DW Eatmon 4343 S. 135th Seattle, WA 98168 WO. JAN 7 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST . ` Control No. CJ�S Epic File No. .25(, -a5 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. :f71/-7 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of app l icant: ikelAlJE.r.7' //1/11)07- 1N/L) eDanP'L uy/a&l eDpP 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /s7 /90E) S'TA'LE 4J,9 — D019iv^03 ,o /91$' 4. Date checklist prepared: 12/,//,8y 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): So 5.4J PeLOVRL 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. /iyzj 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.,//2 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. iva 10. List any government approvals or permits that will beneeded for.your proposal. 401),/rNc" • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? CiivKNo.,JA) - AN_ iow be.oEc_o/U6' c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. v &)KNV,vv — RE,4L Y IJ ecv FEAti d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Na A /Ur' e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Nor..je f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A} /A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Al///9 III Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other ,im>pcts to the earth, if. any: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.. n rklOb,Je.. °f-% iek iVf.,- "� -7.7 b�S S re✓` G�Ctci b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affec your proposal? If so, generally describe. ,101 /:/-,oZ.J,- Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: /-7O-)� . Water a. Surf ace: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. �a,� r • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. n0 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 7")v 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. r7 o 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /2O IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. /-2 0 2)- Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. /7D c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. p70 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and _I runoff water�irppacts, if fny: e i 5T � r�C ,[Jcz> //si ns f o r cJ U 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other -' shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ,70-7-.7 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ,f7o� 'Q Evaluation for - Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: /9 EL 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: e_ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 0 i AE —'auk d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NGn)� b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N D c. What . kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ivoilt 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. AO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: • Evaluation for • Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ,voRrnL 7,P9PP'e woi -Cs 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: won/ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties ? /9 /APFeF /(H7 ,%4'/' /Wel D�L'v '> SiF,Pvict b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Atli c. Describe any structures on the site. zJ/9REH -aust- jl4M L/ 1-105' • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? iTO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? /4— f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? i i'a j.�t j�vs'1^;c, 1 If applicable, what is the current horeline master program designation of the site? ,✓ //9 g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. /J /q i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 3 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ,v .wt k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: ri,49 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and ,cr g plans, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing ? ,J /, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high', middle, or low - income housing. flJ,9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:g/, 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? AVe b. What views in the immediate vicinity would altered or obstructed? ArdNAs7 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A/ /A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? MVO b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Al//9 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affe t your proposal? n! /& d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: A( 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? n! /✓9 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. M c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be proyided by the project or applicant, if any: N3 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: rf/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /NTE,F's7`,9/- -' J- s- J- 1•11 r-9,u/?6't3A1 /9 'E 5r 134f s1-. 4 S. (33 $t.. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? i/0 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project haveg? How many would the project eliminate? N /H • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). gU e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /j/L1 us'F )ci9L /9A/12 Fog /i/L/gN z) ObrtR/0-1-fieN tie 1'W Yep? 1/ S. c-/7/._s' f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. G— P , ,,e p,9 Y g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: A/le 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. M) ) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any._ M0 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. rc - 'ties currently a .b - he site: lectri it .. al as water refuse service, ep one sanitary sew stic tem, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. e x 1 s-j- „ G�eveloforl f C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: /a /a Eh • ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal,, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? ,✓' /p Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Ar/, 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? of //3 Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/00 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and nat9ral resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sits, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? A/,g Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: tv 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only r• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: NA9 How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Mast r Plan? AVA 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N�f.3 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. /T 1Jno I-4 NeT n'i9 /7,.1 y CaNFL /€ f • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy. Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for • Agency Use Only • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the ,objective(s) of the proposal? 7 /Cfc� e. oU` T�c� 1 (5. //-1 cam ex r 7'I (Ie) e What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? /p 0G. f,py) 67 /sue he/'e. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: fic