The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-260-85 - BLOOM BRUCE - OFFICE BUILDINGTSD BUILDING- SHAVEY DEGRASSE 52ND AVE. SO. & SO. 151ST STREET /Zooso Ai/2 EPIC-260-85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 8,000 square foot office building Proponent Bruce Bloom Location of Proposal, including street address, if any S.E. corner of S. 151st St. and 52nd Avenue S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 260 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable . significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 11[ There is no comment period for this DNS [[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date /4 217 l qS$ Signature '' C _,0 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hal'Y, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to.bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. _4 t- ITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM. :CN Y5 =05- EPIC F /G o249 - 75- FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: pi BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE F-1 POLICE El P & R :P;14, PROJECT dilakCy 09443 LOCATION ��d 4 ,30, %� be FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED g'%415 � RESPONSE REQUESTED BY •111/45 STAFF COORDINATOR /0 / Ufa RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL ' 'LIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFIC.IAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD •DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE' ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. . ZI�J 120. pA -leYV s3\A -T—S c�ti S r MAP rP1W ' �. J M I1.1 k - ¶ t • ecy LkiY AN41'S Dtv S Th ■ v bAt t Fo n. "o(kO 9 ()sue . • A Ci ktk,N / Gill- Mk_ /'S I 0 t►,> tla'l._lL_ /� t. rn L 1+`1 Iz -o €.91 u S As zszA rm6 pM-1 • 3 (1A LL i t vOI tip tin -711 -E 'M 1-VAS 'MISS NrAWYATillW LW-\L 11.. &W ■ Tt Ll oCZ, 111 c N\ P L �i INFO itryl (.t n INou s T ` fD `R-furl i 1:0 PO 1 c 'T1N�lN 11•4 cc- E oli N O Al i P ) \SA1 Ntc-- l_ ITlL� V.S. `$(\ ILO) h - PM) Lac fl- 1O l tas 11N'7s o'? -e OU ' ._.Q>ec ? i1 \ M DATE S PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF :TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO:,� (DG fl PLNG (l PROJECT �h LOCATION 2na' qt 5o. /57 DATE TRANSMITTED g -1-1"5"- STAFF COORDINATOR 10 ' ( vna N EPIC ggf -926a 85_ FILE FIRE n POLICE FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .1 ill-15 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFIC.IAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. 219-bi;v6 /f,C-,.w<r- -fL• ,q6- "sic, fr //,2.o,4 G r to; l 7(/-c AA-v,, -z-e.�� DATE 0 IC,G F4 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA ' CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM rtt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM �R� P�E��Nr ►UN BURE,4(/ TO: 0 BLDG ( ] PLNG PROJECT Aa4 y._ LOCATION ,d,r, ? d DATE TRANSMITTED tdp2''Kff" STAFF COORDINATOR K' via �N O5-05 EPIC E12/6-4/90- ' 'FILE P.W. FIRE (] POLICE n P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED -111/41- THE .ATTACHED.ENVIRONMENTAL TRECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS'AVAILABLE IN-THE PLANNING.DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED.TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON'THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. g /As) s) ge a --e uki . sp k-1 p -e G4 4 S- 6 jh.udemka- &4A4' et 74:9 4 h %�,7L ,Q-- c_cess'i / A GCe--6S w 1A.5<- /4"iie.s fe■ (4 , r4 DATE [FEB 141985 CITY OF TUKW11.A PLANNING PEPT. COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 . _ CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG PROJECT LOCATION end qti „r-o, /l DATE TRANSMITTED g'%�� STAFF COORDINATOR PLNG P.W. � CN 53=0 ,35 EPIC Ea// -- - FILE FIRE n POLICE El P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED gleFIS THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL ' IST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO. ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR._ COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON'THE ATTACHED CENTRAL. PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ' aJi DATE 2// / COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 TO. BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Hilly with a ravine b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 50% (10' rise to 10' run) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Hard silt and medium dense sand, with 7 feet of old fill in flat area at south end of site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- , ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Surf ace parking . at north end will be over approx. 1500 yds of compacted fill. Some of fill will come from building excavation at south end. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some, although clearing & building construction will generally be limited to the flat portion of the site only. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 33% Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. As shown on plans, existing culvert at north end of site will be extended and filled over to provide parking area. Stream will flow on from there as it does now. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface -water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected.- Indicate the source of fill material. Once stream is culverted, 1500 yds. + of fill will be placed over that portion (most of which from on site excavation). (See question B.1.e). 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6). Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No What types of, noise exist in the area which may . affect your project .'(for example::. r traffic, equipment,; operation', other)? Freeway traffic adjacent to site. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project .on .a short- term or a long- term basis (for example: traf- fic,:construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the. site. •Construction noise (7:30 to 4:00) for several months. Employee traffic (at 8:00 and 4:30), long term. 3) Proposed measures `to reduce or control . noise.. impacts, if any: :None Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and. adjacent properties? Site: vacant land, north: single family house, west: new multi - family units, south: single-family house, east: vacant strip .of land & freeway off ramp. . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. no c. Describe any structures on the site. None • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Improvement to S. 151st St. (to access parking area from north) As required by Tukwila Public Works standarria _ e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, -generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 24 Peaks: 8:30 & 5:00 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a.. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, . police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The new building would need police and fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG EPICGd' 75" FILE P.W. n FIRE n POLICE O P & R PROJECT A (�j� azikci_ LOCATION 5-2ney C561, fibt FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED t1277-15s- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 01710-51- STAFF COORDINATOR• ',40' O RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL 'LIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING- DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED:TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT., AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON/THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. DATE �7-3 -1:5 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM .• • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ED BLDG .CD PLNG P.W. PROJECT Acufreai _ Z2 V , LOCATION ,I,2nd DATE TRANSMITTED a2'27-25-- STAFF COORDINATOR KJ " Ufa EPCF,„/G,10- 5 FILE n FIRE POLICE ED P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED. ENVIRONMENTAL K IST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD: DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART -: MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING. COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. :. ITEM COMMENT. DATE SITE -LOCATION IS-ON-EXTREME PERIMETER OF PATROL CONFIGURATION IN WHAT IS NORMALLY VIEWED AS AN ISOLATED AREA. THIS COUPLED WITH THE NEIGHBORING FREEWAY AND FREEWAY RAMP WOULD TEND TO MAKE IT A PRIME-TARGET FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY. THE ENVIRONMENTAL-CHECKLIST DESCRIBES FUTURE OCCUPANCY AS OFFICE /PRO FESSIONAL:•THE MAKE =UP OF THE- TENANCY.,:PARTICULARLY IF:THEY ARE OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL. CATAGORY,(.CONTROLLED SUBSTANCEAVAILABILITY), WOULD FURTHER ENHANCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF BURGLARY AND /OR ROBBERY. ALL THESE FACTORS WILL DIRECTLY. IMPACT THE PATROL FORCE REQUIRING MORE THAN NORMAL ATTENTION AND THEREBY REDUCE PATROL.TIME THROUGHOUT THE REST OF THE ASSIGNED PATROL AREA. FOR EXTERIOR LLGHTING AND LANDSCAPING AND INTERIOR SECURITY DEVICES THE BUILDER SHOULD WORK CLOSELY WITH THE CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER. IT WOULD APPEAR TO POSE NO ADVERSE IMPACTS ON TRAFFIC IN THE AREA. COMMENTS PREPARED BY Lowery' C.P.S. Form 11 TO SHAVEY DeGRASSE SHA• Partners in Architecture 2125 First Ave. Suite 101 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121 (206) 622 -7160 ITT 1 K-vil WE ARE SENDING YOU LL:14Cttached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ri nts ❑ Change order LIETTIEV UQ‘alSRI DU1TQa DATE .2.6• g JOB NO. Z A 1� ❑ Plans ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION (o• 2 1 �1 PL.44.I 0- g411404 ev - ric.t►JGj I%Eg. Ce-lActe. rot2-4 is THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For a proval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval or our use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US p_auc 9 t =C.A4I is stit1/4+n E- caJ 1 �s [,�e" v.! '-4 oh! 85 .i, ft `I.• L. 1I Nafftea. a� 01 t cr cw T`t4- �✓ ��- Ti1�.C,I --� Jo° '-o 6ior qv AA. 4ov4,44) COPY TO _~ �' SIGNED: G' PRODUCT240-2 ( Eesf Inc, Groton, nom 0147. It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND ol �-035 Control No. 5 Epic F i l e No. era's(' J2(O J5 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 505 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: TSD Building 2. Name of applicant: Zen McManigal, Architect (Shavey DeGrasse Shavey) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 622-7160 2125 First Avenue, Suite 101. Seattle, WA 98121 4. Date checklist prepared: 1 -30 -85 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): March 4: Submit for permit April 1: Start construction Aug. 1: Occupancy 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None that we're aware of. . List .:any -- government ,.- approvals -'or permits .that wi 11- be - needed for your proposal., • Buildirig: permit.' -('City of Tukwila) Public Works Permit- (City of Tukwila) 11. Give -brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the 'size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not 'need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your . proposal and should not be summarized here. Construction of wood frame, 2 story. 8.000 SF. office hiiLding with surface parking for to cars nn a 77,nn0 S F mite_ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Site occupies southeast corner of intersection of 52nd Ave. S. and South 151st Street. Legal Description: Parcel A, tracts 3 & 4, Young's half acre tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, p 37, King County, Washington. Except that portion condemned in King County Superior Court, Cause # 5.94284 for State Highway # 1 together with that portion: = "of vacated So. 152nd Street adjoining tract 3 as may attach by operation of law. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO. BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, •mountainous, other Hilly with a ravine b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 50% (10' rise to 10' run) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Hard silt and medium dense sand, with 7 feet of old fill in flat area at south end of site d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Surface parking at north end will be over approx. 1500 yds of compacted fill. Some of fill will come from building excavation at south end. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some, although clearing & building construction will generally be limited to the flat portion of the site only. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 33% • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Existing trees and native vegetation on ravine slopes will remain. Newly graded areas will receive fast growing evergreen ground cover. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some vehicle emissions from site work equipment during construction. Auto exhaust from building occupants and visitors to the site after completion. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Small year round streem in ravine. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. As shown on plans, existing culvert at north end of site will be extended and filled over to provide parking area. Stream will flow on from there as it does now. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Once stream is culverted, 1500 yds. + of fill will be placed over that portion (most of which from on site excavation). (See question B.l.e). 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Source: Roof. & parking area Collection: Tightlines from downspouts and catch basin connect to a retention system with a controlled discharge into ravine. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Minimize disruption or removal of existing ground cover (particularly on ravine slopes) to prevent erosion. Bank of fill for parking area to receive fast growing, close -knit g r oundc ov er . 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, a.le aspen, other cottonwood _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approx. 10,000 S.F. of the site's wild grasses, shrubs and trees will be cleared for new construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None that we know of • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Reintroduction of existing natural vegetation along with new evergreen trees and groundcover to preserve existing fabric of ravine. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: blackbirds, robins mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. .Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Preservation of stream & large trees on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric: Lights, office machines, computers. Natural gas: Heat (this is not certain since mechanical system is bidder design .7— b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:. Inset windows on south face and minimal windows on west to reduce summer heat gain. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only What; types of, noise exist in the area which may .affect your - project -(for example: traffic, equipment,, operation, other)? • Freeway traf-f=ic" :adjacent to, site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic,.construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. .Construction noise (7:30 to 4:00) for several months. Employee traffic (at 8:00 and 4:30), longterm. 3) Proposed measures "to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: vacant land, north: single family house, west: new multi - family units, south: single family house, east: vacant strip of land & freeway off ramp. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Professional office f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? office g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site ? , Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 21 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Development of new sidewalk and planting strip along 52nd Ave. S. to match new projects to the south. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? Does not apply b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 20' -0" maximum height. Stucco and cedar siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Territorial view east towards freeway from multi - family units to the west of site will be partially blocked (on their 1st floors) . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Placement of first floor below grade to make building only 1 story in height as seen from street. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from interior lighting during regular business hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N� c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? From freeway: Light standards and headlights. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Tree buffer to remain. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Tukwila Park 1/ mile east. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency.Use Only Historic, and Cultural, Preservation Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, :general l.y ,describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed ,measures to .reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving -the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site fronts on 52nd Ave. S. which intersects 1 block south with S. 154th St. (Southcenter Blvd.) which provides access to 1-5. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 3/4 of a mile to stop at Southcenter, or 1 mile to stop at Highway 99. c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 20 None eliminated. • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Improvement to S. 151st St. (to access parking area from north) As required by Tukwila Public Works standards. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, -generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 24 Peaks: 8 :30 & 5:00 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, . police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The new building would need police and fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities a. C'rcle utilities currently available at the site: atural gas, ‹fuse servic ar sewer septic system, of Wash. Natural Gas Company will let me know about availability. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric: Puget Power, phone: PNB Tel., Water: District 125, Sewer: Bellevue, Refuse: 3 companies available. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 1 -30 -85 Evaluation for Agency Use Only - TOBE COMPLETED BY APPLICAA, D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. Now would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only ' -TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide a headquarters for a commercial business presently leasing space elsewhere in Tukwila. (which they are out- growing) Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Finding a larger space to lease in a better location, or building their own building. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The company doesn't want to invest in building their own building and a larger tenant space may not suit their specific needs so our client (the project owner) will custom build this project to suit their needs and give them a long term lease. OFbICE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA TO: FROM: VIC- DATE: SUBJECT: B-I BORING LOCATION TP=I TEST Pif LOCATION -4)- PH-I PROBE HOLE LOCATION SCALE: 0 5 10 20 B-2 i PROPOSED 'BUILDING\ P1 L PAVEMEN.t....EDGE--52nd...AVE..$ SI 40 PLAN REF. TOPO. BY LEONARD 1. SCHROETER 8-7-.."-1 • fl TERRA ASSIOCIATES GeotechnIcal Consultants BORING AND TEST PIT LOCATION BLUME OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA • WASHINGTON ProJ. No. 142 1Date FEB. 85 'Plate I - I" -FENCE T vC H ,: 4/ 4la 2 lC '( . 3.9..,x, e_...v .,y c tic CI.. wear • %'\•'1FL = .60.6. '.v _ 7?.c, •J.._..-. 15_' T1g17•_.E. FE • ..-- i+c'r. G. .._ . . — .A111Ne T'_ �.t9 'ToO L•.;• afros / 7l r,•: / --- NFNO.24 CMp.60� -3 / C 54- =Tov:. 98.9•T••• 9TL =4T.P . • L' A2.0 • c n, IpT ) • ,' l 1% 2$:'T PP '171.1.4 . iZ6 R _ ,:(:(A''...-------1;,•11-:'1, (17(X1.) _ %...'.."---- - -_ is /. Q F. ? L 11Y0c.o.NT- a 9, w•.-• B9 1rwN E. 4 w.OLToP� • 44 571.,.zD 09' 0.c.) \ •:N.1., 1.---7 .BB G• 4-11-r,-....,, • 0T.2 E E o •• —^l 1^ 1tC M ? e P -L.. --^-,------7 - -. 9o.T T. EDG. PnvannaNr (0....$4".-r) 7-c S... L N -Ev- eM,.Ft - - _ I1 - .` -A- Qtr... 44005 F.1- • .15:47 J •�� _ .. - - 1 293 33 - Tov -; 299 4T' T...r :Jr -' F • . . - - - _ - _- YS•9.4.T .e G -_. —Z - II . . 92 . . Fne L11Y Dl .W W.L PP ..•/l .c •ec_oan.. •.a p -.••ec t . C 'Eo�e ,..,1,,.... 7,....... 908. - TeUcN ----- I '� E..94 �_ FP a T6 l T ........• �s. E cr.92.99 ) , _ . _ I — — -- - v.90.6-SE rDawlwP _ r' ly(w -n.P ,v$ -- _ . 9 t -/ . E..... ____R,..._....._......,...(0. ---3,1:--- _ —_ __ ------ 1 -- ------- _ _ c . ,- :(b ��wv., Tvee. :D.T_ �' -90.0 1.,-PC.-4, 4- P./ AT En_ rip. T. P.') I I • E.e .,: 9 t %z) et' -_ .• 925..E.aoa PAV elneNr. SAN.SEw Ea. F. I:..i_-99z.T9 -(1 F.L. s 14 799 LO•LALTao M .ow.. F..o., NILE To S.). - • 24' SS NOTLS 1. E A.1; R P NTED A 1G_C.h•G.'6 F.• He 1 r • TlEn�l -1 '!. 'r'1•.•� -':'.K �+.TE LEG F'.�.'DESCR1PT tON TR Acr 3 .4. .t U'..NuS HALF'i ACRE : TRACTS , P.= ORDING TO THE' PLAT 1::1.4CORDE0 -IN VOL 1(o PLATS; PA.2E. 3'-7• 3'41 NC? CO'•.NT'., WASHINGTON. EX = EPT T ■-■AT _POF<T “Or, .:COND'cM:.ED' 'tN . 34.11'1G COUNT -r • SO'-EFi1OFR COURT, CAUSE *3 594'L84: FOR STATE :HIGHWAY u' 1. TOGETHER `+4t-s- THAT- PORTION OF "VACAT ED:.:So. 152ND 51 -REST Alps) Oln oNG ,TRACT -3 As 'N1 Ax ATTACH -$ Y L A4 i LEGENL F C- Z VF- ,RN,t•-T I "ill OF .° ,mow So J.•. 2TEv. •NC v. �, 'w = ., C_: T' . -r LGT� • •-'1 0• - . T 1_ - p. A._a•[ i e.a = -G 'J11 --r 1 =a THE 'F:L' E� tyb Y i' /10 w,1U VIE NT I-- _oC/•.r.o rte. F-C�T� 1,— . -./JE �T )14 gaelleED E8 7 1985 2125 FIR 7.:A•/ENUE, )UITE 1.Oi Co " -_2 -716.0 • No. I amsloNS / - C;1•S l r%T# 3^ ti s -11 a o• a .• d LEONARD 1.•SCHROE.TER CIVIL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR 3201 LW. 13210 • SWILL WAUOIGTON 96166 • .202 -0621 SCALD 11N.sIQFT DATE 1 -10-85 DRAWN 1h1LS s1taT 196 N0. liato9