The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-261-85 - WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY RESURFACING (STATE ROUTE 181)SR 181 RESURFACING- WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY SOUTH 212T" TO SR 405 EPIC - 261 -85 JOHN SPELLMAN Governor STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of District Administrator • D -1, 6431 Corson Ave. So., C -81410 • Seattle, Washington 98108 April I, 1985 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 SR 181 South 212th to SR 405 Resurfacing Project L -7329 Dear Mr. Beeler: We have enclosed information on the work to be done at the flap gate drainage outfall on the east bank of the Green River. Because the project is part of normal maintenance procedure to prevent damage to the existing outfall, we are asking that the work be considered exempt from the Shoreline Management permit requirement. Also, the estimated cost for the erosion control work is approximately $850. Of that amount $I00 is for excavation and $750 for the riprap and ballast. Approximately ten cubic yards of riprap and ballast foundation will be placed at the site (for details and dimensions please see the enclosed plan sheets). The outfall and the area where the riprap is to be placed are below the ordinary high water line. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Pat McGuire (233 -2413) of my staff. Should there be any problem with the exemption please arrange a meeting with us at your earliest convenient time. Sincerely, R. F. ''JOHNS ON, P. E. District Design Engineer PDM /hl Enclosure DUANE BERENTSON Secretary PROJECT DESCR/PT/ON, • • Th,s project proposes to ,replace and restore. hand anted rprop - at the Flap gate oveCall in the vio,n;ey or SR/8/, M.P. /1.06. Ex,st ins cone/ tIons reowre, • rna,ntena a., or eros,on b, 1jh water- . will render . this outra II useless.- . - SR /8/ 7.E cla.ssr,ea', by D 0 77 '..s level of development p,ogram , a.. "maintain Struetcfra/ iniear,t and operational 1 sateA,/, .4. h . • J • Y '7 '..3 -7. - Any work performed or contracted by Me State. ,s cil:! r e ma,nienante variebv . ' . ' . • .. / . • ,- • SR /8/ M.P. /106 STA. /55i 00 • . • . • IBGHLND I P.7.RIS I WHITE CENTSR ) rni:Ct• , . • ,1 16- ) ( R.7.17;IER BEACH • eBwocros. •I Lk 30 C•ee T 23 ff 41'; o) Poo .7.34/ ,11 128,!,/ • - . I I '• A' 11 • ok,C;1.1"j I 7.1713. • r-J F'. Ai Bur ien ; LA . SEA-TAG y ERNATIONAL ` AIRPORT L - 1 T 22 N • I. . , 1 ' - / • Ro 0 VI. \ • . \ Pett!kon •- - ' SE 2567r, • • '1 PONT . • stre- oLSK . , Door:: - i 7-22N ; 1 - - • • - • T2/N Ooh Point • - - ! Be77,,c7?1 0.) 0 I171 • \s • • .• L. , • • . — • . • •ea oSS . —J1 • :Ii•E St • crl'i rH • CYnon, 0 in":. , / • • , . • cl-( . -1- • /(-;---/ • k 1 • Green River •: Lo..e 7.: • .. :151;7:: Mce: e • • ••„.•, • . . , •k 6rn.inS POin1 ("0 "Ta• 'Z. • et, or -s. • 49.k I IL \ - , TACOMA. , . or: STATE DRAWN CHECKED PROJ. ENGR. DIST ADM.. 10 WASH JOB I.JUBE • DATE REVISION BY APP D CONTRAC 7 NC. FED AID PROJ NO. ',V 7 sr s DIVISION. OF HIGHWAYS APPROVED , LAMING • :.'• . I: • , ./ , • ;•'; . • A • • " N in Mi • I 14 GEYSER • '4/ AIM Washington State • Wi' Department of Transportation • : . VICINITY MAP- K-E DOT "" 221-011 /Flo SHE f TS, So /id MMeto/ Cover for C.B. (5 td. Pion B -19.1) NOTES: ,E /e v Meto/ Frame for C.'j Std. Pion B- 19.1 fxponsion Bolt Elev. v. C 5trop i/ Restricto• 2' m:n' • W,14 5 /ide Out /et 1 Except As Shown Or Rioted, Units 5ho// Be Constructed in Accordance With The Requirement For Catch Bosin Type 17 fir Standard Pion B-6.2 And Section 7-05 Of The Standard SpecS'cotions 2. Fo,- Details Not Shown, See Stondord Pion 8-6.2 . 3 Units Shall Be Reinforced Per Catch Bos,n Type II Standard Pion B-6.2. ' 1i.,h w.� -,,r t le',. -!• J F /ow /i..e E/ev /6 06' (approx.) 4 Ladder Rungs Shall Conform -To Standard B-9.1 And 57'2ndard Spec; ficot.on Section 7 -05. 5. Lh"t Chain Shall Be Galvanized And OF 200 lbs. Ca/Doc/75"; 6 Thr Restroinin9 Strap Is Required Where D.stance B -C /5 Greater Than 6 Feet: 7 Restraining Strop Sho // Be 3/6"x .3" A -36 Stee/ W.th A-153 Ga/vanizin9. -. B. C /eonout Gate Sho // Be One OF The Fo / /ow.n9: 0. 'Armco /50 Turnout Gate. - • • - b Waterman C -2 - D,stribut,on .Gat' With 8 Gal. S /.de. C. Approved Equal To a orb Above. 9. E.rpansion, Bo /ts Shall Be Commercially ' A'yt.lab /e And• 3 /GS " D,om. /'latch Ex,s,f /no Frof:ie Elev. = B.7' (approx.) - In /et P,,pe Slott- • YO.. 01/ Restrictor•Shal/ Be Fabricated From Schedule • A'i= Corrugated Meta /. Pipe In Accordance -With. AASHTO:". Des'gnation M 36, M 196 Or M 197. J,o,nts 'Show/). Are -'Optional. For Pre Cos t' Units. Cost ` /n' • -F' /ace dn.ts` Shall r Be :'Roured W shout Jo.rl1s Set.we`en;. .The; Base' And The Top..', ; - :•y Out /et. She // Bel'Connected .To Cu /rert: 0,- Sewer' F. ,V,t1i A -.Standard.>•Band'..Or'Groute'd into - The` C7F' Coner•ete .PJpe f�ivrneht "'Sha // .,Be Per Eoeh For �Mod�f ed, Type Catch Bos'n W.:th O'7.= Res trictci he Vertical Stem Of Tim O./, ReStr.e'or Sha // 8e Tie ' • Sane,.Diometer,As The:•hC�i.zonta /- Ou tie r.:'Ape Unless . 'U /heiiv,se' .Noted As Diometei'G 0,, The -,O, -/ -Restr,C.'.tor :khedu /e. SECT info,: place). S1op4, Prctec-r ;or. ni Ovt4'a01 /Sec.lion A -A Or/ Restr /ctor' Schedule UN /T. -. • Elevation.. A ' .ZG;39 E /cvofion B'. -. 9- (Max.) bnn E /evert /on C - .23.89..046x.) : elevation D t•4 -8.9- (Min.) .AA Min. Overt /ow E 0.5' Or /Free D.om F /8" Pipe Dram G /8". ' • SLOPE PROTECTION 1" = 10' ver +real 10 AT OUTFALL &ciiilast - ''prop —.,O C. Y.: Tt is rJJI: -10 0 I (b 120 !40 A C.V.D. Of 1929 20' S-,c.'.zor,to,l STATE FED. AID PRO J. NO. S,.LE T DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RAWN J. 1. Stevenson EVIEWED G HECKED J ROJ. 'NASH R Schworer E. Miles JOB NUMBER ENGR. R.F. HAUKAP 1ST. ADM Washington State Department. of. Transportation SHORELINE PROFILE 5 ^EET . R.E.BOCKSTRUCK DATE REVISION 8'' APP D •APPROvED DOT fORM 221 -011 Revised 6/80 - 0, S "EETS 0 0 ro f) 0 in 155 '14 SR 181 0 0 r- '7 co 0 cn • •• • . • • • **.• 0 ; - • , -.12 0 00 - - - - in* . . . . "' ,•. , 8.1-.. 0 a _ 20 00: Ex-ifing 151pe Max. Inv • E:lev. = 18 89 • 15:00 154 - 155 2" .050870 (Min) • 9.64 1 2 34 14 ' 0.50% 156 - • t • - - 157-- *- - - -158 - - • • . • . 1211 • . • 1,* • ..; Fence Fabric- ; • • • 12`' - - -0 50% i ' .. '' • 0e5,-?°/;?_..1... ' • .1 „...... . • .- , 174 . -1. . • " . - .. . * • . .* 0.50% 2 15 26 20.82 ,.-.• 21 27 .. . .• . , . . . . , - 59 -• • 160 ---: -;••••• - • 162 - 1. 73 • 23 41 - • 23 03 • • -- 163 . -164: .ZO•Z.V/1"71//kW 4SN.NY//,k%Y ;DATUM Af6VD. Of I529 • . . • • - DRAWN J I. Stevenson REVIEWED G.R Schworer CHECKED J. E Miles • PROJ. ENGR. R F Houkop DIST. ADM R E Bockstruck DATE - REVISION BY APP D STATE .10 WASH JOB NUMBER CONTRACT NO. FED. AID PROJ. NO 5 ••„1,.,F. • DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS APPROVED Washington State Department of. Transportation SITE PLAA /ELEVAT/ON 5,EET OF SHEETS DOT FORM 221-028 Ravicati • /R0 O y 2 .19 08 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor February 22, 1985 Molly Johnson Department of Transportation D -1, 6431 Corson Ave. S. C -81410 Seattle, WA 98108 Re: Determination of Non - Significance SR -181 Dear Ms. Johnson: Attached are our comments on your determination. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Respec L. Rick Beeler Associate Planner Enclosures CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM k05, TO; _ n BLDG ri PLNG P.W. PROJECT it2. 1 P..ebt&y..f- dic CN a5a3g EPIC f- ,42 /G'c216, /' ?.:5- FILE — ,LOCATION, ) 12.141. 0 50e &/0 5 DATE TRANSMITTED P 3 IW STAFF COORDINATOR gte, FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY RESPONSE RECEIVED .1//c? F5 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- !ENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH 'TARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT- -A 7 WHY- NOT INSTALL BUS PULLOUTS AND SHELTERS ON BOTH SIDES -OF WEST VALLEY • -•; HIGHWAY- AT THE ENTRANCE TO T.lNCACRF.S (R 15R ST) AND STRANDER BLVD. 15 PUBLIC- SERVICE...INCREASED TRAFFIC CONGF.STTnT AmD THE POTENTIAL FOR ACCIDENTS WILL REQUIRE SOME EMPHASIS PATROL DURING THE CONSTRUCTION._ PERIOD. . GENERAL AT THE TIME OF THIS UNDERTAKING THERE ARE CONSTRTIC.TTnN PT ANS ON THE _DRAWING BOARD FOR ANOTHER HOTEL IN THE VICINITY OF. SOUTH 158 ST. AND WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY. SHOULD THESE OR SIMILAR PLANS PRESS FORWARTI TWFV LTTLL GENERATE THE NEED FOR ANBS ADDITIONAL LANE FROM THE SOUTHBOUND EXIT OF I405 TO THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AND THE INTERSECTION OF THE HIGHWAY AND STRANTIRR RTxm THIS LANE WILL BE PARTICULARLY CRITICAL AT S 158 AND VALLEY HIGHWAY. PJL • DATE z /IQa5 i COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.F.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING F TO;. fl BLDG j PLNG PROJECT `Jt2 1 4 I K.C,��jl Can LOCATION , / t 54C &/O DATE TRANSMITTED ?//,';3/35 STAFF COORDINATOR ft, CN g5-63g EPIC F.A /C -O2G %'g5- FILE '- FIRE 741 POLICE n P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ,a%Cdif5 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS :REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT NOTE: THIS PROJECT IS FOR STREET MAINTENANCE ONLY. PUBLIC WORKS VIEW OF THIS PROJECT IS THAT IT DOES NOT CONSITT.UTE A FINAL STREET IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE THE ELEMENTS OF THIS PROJECT DO NOT DEVELOP SR!7.181 TO THE CITY'S CURRENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING STANDARDS FOR NUMBER OF LANES, SIGNALIZATIONS, CURB /GUTTERS; SIDEWALKS, UTILITY UNDERGOURNDINGS, DRAINAGE OR;'.EINALL.r.i;.'TS STREET ALIGHNMENT. 10 "FLOOD ZONE CONTROL PERMIT" IDENTIFIED FROM KING COUNTY. I BEI IEVF COMES .2 FROM CITY OF TUKWILA AND ALSO ANOTHER ONE FROM D.O.E. (CHECK WITH K.C. AND D.O.E. ON THIS) ITEM 5 ON PAGE 4 CONFIRMS THAT TWO F.Z.C.P.'S ARE REQUIRED FROM THE CITY AND D.O.E. 8c BIN WALLS NEXT TO GREEN RIVER EXIST AND ARE STRUCTURES. 16c STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.F.S. Form 11 - 'CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM BY TUiNifLA FIRE PREVENIIO BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 055. 8 TO; . f BLDG fl PLNG I/1 P.W. PROJECT .V J I P.,/, w- FC(CJfr1 LOCATION , gi v, '9D DATE TRANSMITTED r9 %355 STAFF COORDINATOR CN �5 -132 EPIC /16. -9l /'15- FILE — 741 POLICE (] P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /1 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT Aye, DATE / &5 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.F.S. Form 11 JOHN SPELLMAN Governor STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of Distract Administrator • D -1, 6431 Corson Ave. So., C -81410 • Seattle, Washington 98108 February 6, 1985 Mr. Brad Collins, Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: D[EIHNIED FEB 8 1985 CITY D>s TUKWILA PLANNING. DEPT. Determination of Non - Significance SR 181 South 212th to SR 405 Resurfacing L -7329 Attached are copies of the Determination of Non - Significance and the environmental checklist for the above project. These were prepared in accordance with State Environmental Policy Act regulations, and are being circulated for review to all agencies with jurisdiction. We would appreciate your review of the proposal and return of written comments by February 21, 1985. This proposal will not be acted on before that time. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact Molly Johnson at 233 -2415. MAJ /hl Attachments Sincerely, R. F. •HNSON, P. E. District Design Engineer DUANE BERENTSON Secretary DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: This project will resurface SR 181 from South 212th Street to SR 405. Right turn lanes will be added at Strander Boulevard and South 212th Street. Bus pullouts will be constructed near South 204th Street at the Boeing Aerospace Center. Drainage will be improved near Longacres Track. Proponent: Washington State Department of Transportation Location of proposal, including street address, if any: The project is located on SR 181, also known as the West Valley Highway, in the cities of Kent, Renton, and Tukwila, and Urban King County. Lead agency: Washington State Department of Transportation The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2IC.030(2)(c). This decision was mode after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by February 21, 1985. Responsible official: J. R. STEPHENSON, P. E. Position /title: District Location Engineer Phone: 233 -2305 Address: 9611 S.E. 36th Street, Mercer Island, Washington 98040 Date: Z A/ PS— Signat ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts for your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. The checklist questions apply to all parts of the proposal, even if they are planned over a period of time. Attach any additional information that will help describe the proposal or its environmental effects. Be prepared to explain answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: SR 181 South 212th to SR 405 Resurfacing and Safety Improvements 2. Name of proponent: Washington State Department of Transportation 3. Address and phone number of proponent and contact person: 6431 Corson Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Contact Person: Molly Johnson Phone: 233 -2415 4. Date checklist prepared: February 1, 1985 5. Agency requesting checklist: Washington State Department of Transportation 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will begin approximately July 1985 and be completed approximately December 1985. 7. Are there any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Bus shelters will be constructed by Metro at the bus pullouts. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal? If yes, explain. The City of Kent has proposed formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) to construct curb, gutter and sidewalk, and construct enclosed storm sewers from South 212th Street to South 180th Street. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for the proposal, if known. A Water Pollution Control Plan will be prepared for Department of Ecology approval. The project will also need a Shoreline Permit from the City of Tukwila, a Flood Control Permit from King County, a Hydrualic Project Approval from the Departments of Fisheries and Game, and an Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit. 1 I. Give brief, complete description of the project including (but not limited to) its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature. There are several questions in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of the proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project will resurface 3.7 miles of SR 181 with 0.12 feet of asphalt concrete pavement. Two bus pullouts will be constructed near South 204th Street at the Boeing Aerospace Center, one adjacent to the northbound lanes and one adjacent to the southbound lanes. Metro will construct bus shelters at the bus pullouts after this project is constructed. Right turn pockets will be added southbound at Strander Boulevard and at South 212th Street. An existing unused cross culvert will be connected to a new outfall to the Green River near Longacres Track. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of the proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. The project is located on SR 181, also called the West Valley Highway, between Interstate 405 and South 212th Street, in the cities of Kent, Tukwila, and Renton, and urban King County. It traverses Township 23 North, Range 4 East in Sections 24, 25 and 36, and Township 22 North, Range 4 East in Sections 1, 2, 11 and 12. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: Flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately I percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils are slightly silty to silty - gravelly, fine to coarse sand. There is no prime farmland on the project site. d. Are there surface indications of history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Some settlement has occurred in the southbound lanes north of Strander Boulevard due to a drainage condition. Some localized erosion is present along unstable portions of the banks of the Green River. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading and filling will be required for the bus pullouts and right turn lanes. There will be no net change as a result of the project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion is possible, however, the erosion control measures required by the Water Pollution Control Plan will prevent any impacts. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 90 percent of the state owned right -of -way for this highway is presently covered with impervious surfaces. This project will increase impervious surface area by less than I percent. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Rip -rap will be placed in the new outfall to the Green River. A Water Pollution Control Plan will be prepared. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example: dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some objectionable odors may be present duirng paving. Some dust may also be present. Automobile emissions will not increase. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on, or in, the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The highway is adjacent to the Green River from about South 182nd Street to SR 405. SR 181 crosses Mill Creek twice in the viciniity of South 200th Street. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project will be within 200 feet of both the Green River and Mill Creek. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Twelve cubic yards of rip -rap will be placed on the bank of the Green River at the site of the new outfall. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The project is within the Green River flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be dicharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff from the highway currently flows into existing drainage systems along the length of the project. This project will not increase the amount of storm water. The runoff that will enter the Green River through the new outfall previously entered the Green River through an existing outfall. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials could enter ground or surface waters if a spill occurred on the highway, but the likelihood of this is small. An oil restrictor will be installed in the new catch basin to filter the highway runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: Rip -rap will be used at the outfall, an oil restrictor will be installed, and erosion control measures will be used. 4. Plants a. Types of vegetation found on the site: Grass b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Less than an acre of grasses will be removed. The area is previously disturbed and urbanized, and much of the area where widening will take place presently has no vegetation. -5- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: No landscaping is proposed for this project. 5. Animals a. Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, songbirds, and other waterfowl. mammals: beaver, and other rodents. fish: salmon and trout. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Steelhead and salmon use the Green River for migration. Some salmon may use Mill Creek. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Erosion control measures will prevent impacts to the Green River and Mill Creek. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Fossil fuels will be used during construction. Some electricity will be used for the proposed new lighting at the bus pullouts. b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental 'health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that would occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect the project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a Tong -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise levels will increase during construction. These increases will be short -term and would occur during the day or evening hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The contractor will be required to obey local noise regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used as a highway. The adjacent properties commercially for manufacturing, for recreation, and residentially. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site was probably used for agriculture at one highway for many years. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site has no structures. The adjacent areas have some residences, businesses, warehouses, and large manufacturing facilities. are used time, but has been a d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? State highway. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? State highway. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. g. h. Has any part of the site been classified cis an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal. is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None -8- 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The bus shelters will be Tess than ten feet tall. They will be constructed of wood with plexiglass windows. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None I I. Light and Glare a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Some increase in light or glare may occur during construction. The bus pullouts will be lighted for safety. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Longacres track is adjacent to the project. Also sortie playfields, bike trails, and fishing areas. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project, if any: None -9- I3. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project is on SR 181, also known as the West Valley Highway. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro transit uses SR 181 as a transit route along the length of the project. The bus pullouts will be transit facilities. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project will improve SR I81. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project has two railroad crossings. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g• None Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Service a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. AOP Design Engineer Signature: Date Submitted: