Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-262-85 - CITY OF TUKWILA - 51ST AVENUE SOUTH ANNEXATION51ST STREET ANNEXATION REZONE WEST SIDE OF 51ST AVE. SO. BETWEEN S0. 161sT ST. & SO. 164th St. EPIC - 262 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Rezone of single family King County zoned property (RS -7200) to City of Tukwila single family zoning of R -1 -7.2 Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any west side of 51st Ave. So. between So. 161st St. and So. 164th St. consisting of 3.48 acres. The subject properties bear the addresses of 16049, 16059, 16209, 16211, 16219, 16227, 16233, 16239, 16249 51st Avenue South; 4918 South 164th Street, and 4929, 2930 South 161st St. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC262 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. (l There is no comment period for this DNS E This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by .March 22, 1985 Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address Date 3 - g- ers- 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Signature �• You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at Ciy Ha 1, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM• TO: n BLDG <NG P.W. ( (FIRE PROJECT i/ adil/n L1-a- 'M L_bi L:E LOCAT ION - ` i "171 t DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR' •CN EPIC ;(p2- ?5 FILE -oy- {e POLICE n P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY c3/145- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. DATE % COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. EPIC ;0 F5 FILE FIRE POLICE 1 P & R PROJECT ,,-70;t: a ,12f2LX L?' O �f C%F LOCATION p -a- ,Mad c.177a. DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. ,z;,---G(-/-R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 0/145- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON'THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT THIS PROPOSED REZONE FROM RS7200 (COUNTY ZONING) TO R -1 -7.2 (TUKWILA ZONING WILL HAVE NO IMPACT UPON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. DA T E i/ 01 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 0 BLDG Q PL�NG� P.W. FIRE PROJECT ,F7. Ct4 L 1!�1c.�i zo J LOCATION 6V- FILE NO. ----0y -42 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .3/`%4.' EPIC (p2- 5'5 FILE POLICE »r1 P & R DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR M1/g5 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM . ONE` D5 2 EPIC ;(g,2--f15.- FILE (f . 'oy- %e TO: n BLDG PLNG P. FIRE POLICE 1 P & R 1 PROJECT J7 0,t7 a n21�' Xeth . WI z '2 zi LOCATION 6V-a 4.eut/.(%I (12/e22 i FILE NO O 5---10f1- 42 DATE TRANSMITTED .-V 7/35 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 0/145 - STAFF COORDINATOR v5,6e ,��,(�, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED' TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON'THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM •COMMENT No a fl) M DATE Wo`��l' COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 410 ffos:2. EPIC ;(p` -F5 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG t 1 PLNG P.W. FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT nk2 t a libri .- W%b'( ZK) K� L:E LOCATION 672 i i "%',IQ _ FILE NO. %--oy "R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY a:3/7 4 DATE TRANSMITTED -STAFF COORDINATOR .V21/5/3- /l/J RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 22_ cr, COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL R -V'IEW ROUTING FORM I N �5 Q3 2 EPIC 15 FILE jf, _G)q" 1e. TO: mBLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE ( (POLICE I P & R PROJECT �% LOCATION U. DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR Ote crin , FILE NO. .5.7- %y "R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 0/7//'5 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR.. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE `Z r � 3--S COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Contr No. 551052 arty OFT' Epic File No. V.0'� -�,j Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 11 /1n FEB 27 IMa IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 51st Street Annexation Rezone 2. Name of applicant: Tukwila Planning Commission 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 15, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Completion of rezone by Summer 1985. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future annexations and subsequent rezonings are possible at the request of adjacent property owners. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Checklist was prepared for the annexation request - EPIC. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 101. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Planning Commission and City Council approval of the rezone request. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone of single family King County zoned property (RS -7200) to City of Tukwila single family zoning of R -1 -7.2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The subject area lies on the west side of 51st Ave. So. between So. 161st St. and So. 164th St. consisting of 3.48 acres. The subject properties bear the addresses of 16049,16059, 16209, 16211 ,16219,16227,16233,16239,16249 51st Avenue South; 4918 South 164th Street; and 4929, 2930 South 161st Street. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO 'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other slopes somewhat downward from North to South b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 16.6% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. surface soil is brown gravely silty sand (loose to medium dense moist) at depths of 5 to 10 feet the soil is gray silt with sand lenses and rust stains. (stiff, moist) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, at site of Valley View Estates rpoposal (EPIC- 205 -83) due to excavation activity in 1966 for I -5 construction. Existing stability is being reviewed in this projects FEIS. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction* or use? If so, generally describe. No construction proposed. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None since construction isn't proposed. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Adjacent city streets and I -5 impact air quality. Valley View Estates DEIS (EPIC- 203 -83) indicates this is not a significant impact c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: none 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. none Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate- the source of fill material. none 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. no 0 Evaluation for b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No more than existing accrueing from single family development. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None, except pnssible driveway surface water funoff from Pxisting single family development. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Single family residences discharge into existing city storm drain system. Agency Use Only • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Perhaps oil from automobiles and fertilizer chemicals from single family lawn maintenance. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: none 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other e• vergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other r s• hrubs g• rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? none c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none known Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4 III Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: none . Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: miscellaneous common varieties mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels, rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: none Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Existing single family development uses existing various utilities b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire, medic 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1). What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from adjacent streets and I -5. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. See EPIC - 203 -83 which indicates noise levels probably do not exceed existing health standards. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use . What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single family b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Single family structures • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County RS7200 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Tukwila Plan shows the area as single family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside. or work in the completed project? approximately 26 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to /A avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed rezone would ensure compatability with Tukwila Zoning and comprehensive plan. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? No new units, only existing housing b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. ,Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 25 feet b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Crestview Park that is under construction b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Area lies approximately 1/4 mile from the southwest intersection of I -405 and I -5. Direct access to 51st Ave. So., So. 161st St. and So. 164th St. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Site is served by Metro Transit Route 240 which travels along 51st Ave. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No more than existing. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, -generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No more than existing - approximately 78 adt g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Slight expansion of police patrol area which is currently coincidental. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. existing development 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. W�l Vu SewQr D' rict ater District #75 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, .the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed rezoning will create no changes in the environment Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or TAserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Conditions will not change due to the proposed rezone Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No affect Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No affect • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: - N/A %. BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAS III Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objectives of the proposed rezoning is to change the •Kinq County zoning designation to a comparable Tukwila zoning classification for newly annexed property. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The alternatives would be to change the Kinq County zoning to Tukwila Zoning designations other than R1 7.2 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: To change the Kinq County inning to a Tukwila zoning classification other than Ri 7.2 wnuld create nonconforming situations for some of the existing structures on the subject property or would increase the density standards for the area. Increasing density standards would not be in accordance with the comprehensive land use plan and would not be compatible with existing neighborhood characteristics. • ! •. x113_„ 48 VACATED ia.ru —� J • 1 •ECEtVE1 CITY OF UNNIZA Ftts 2? 1985 ALBERT L. PITT 20 Ac UNPLATTEO j? X 4OvWARO E 1 PARSONS ti 1 I / � +i 1�! t.13AC. r W MRS. GLENN H. HCLS I NGE R 420 AC r•S 442 7 TRACT E 12 • MRS. GLENN H. HOISINCER • 3.65 Ac 0 0 8 • tLJ eJ z i 58TH�.� 57.E Me /7 r 0 • • •./. 2 . 1 I i _ : 'LO 0 ` a 13 In X' IIIIIb— ei 75 55 ti 1 • Y 1 � 1 • — w ti _ (sr Pure ..f, .a (: 1L T.. ZONN Ex /577/46 -RS 797x, try) pRoPoseb • lj- /-7.] &vr) !� _ 11 �`° ' ° J ▪ L.4.1 L. --- == - -.i T'•∎∎∎ = t 1 4424 1 at. II ,.I _ 1641S :rn o -.jam • • _J2_ •40 40 • r , ,r• rr • jr ••1 4 r-- 113 •t o J U - —i W rs 6� �1 r Qc vI 4t• •• 7.5' IiS.40 l • /S /00 1v • r, • 4 n . ,,, • (?o II 1 O, 40 • • /G0/ •o 0 /G d/o ronve • 11.00A r k O1:774 4; • �c. r 8. 11.60 Co A� ! 1t'€r /4,5: do x 0 f ,c or -d .. -r 0 01 /GA1 9.: . /GOS 17 IMP.