The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-267-85 - JANUARY LEASING - FEWEL SITE REVISIONSFEWEL SITE REVISION ADDITIONAL PAVING FOR PARKING 13925 INTERURBAN AVE. S. WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal addition of 2,000 sq. ft. of pavement for parking and access to an existing office development and installation of landscaping Proponent January Leasing Co. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 13925 Interurban Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No EPIC - 263 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS C1 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date May 9, 1985 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. e TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. •Evaluation for 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objective of the first proposal is to complete the paving around the building to provide more parking and vehicle circulation. The second proposal would provide a new access easement'hetween this property and the adj- acent property to make vehicle circulation to and from the site easier. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Alternative means to accomplish better circulation and increase parking would be to have the Owner buy more land near the area. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The alternative means would entail buying a large piece of property to put a small amount of paving on which is not desireable because of the amount of money it would take. But if the same goal can be reached on the existing property. the adjoining property could be lied fnr fururP dPvelnpmPnt. The Owner would prefer the original proposal. -22- Agency Use Only RECEIVED MY OF TUKVIt APR 11 1985 OS■I:' Ftwa1 bite �P,U TO BCCOMPLETED BY APPLICANT • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objective of the first proposal is to complete the paving around the building to provide more parking and vehicle circulation. The second proposal would provide a new access easement between this property and the adj- acent property to make vehicle circulation to and from the site easier. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Alternative means to accomplish better circulation and increase parking would be to have the Owner buy more land near the area. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The alternative means would entail buying a large piece of property to put a small amount of paving on which is not desireable because of the amount of money it would take. But if the same goal can be reached on the existing property. the adjoining property could be used for fnrnre devPlnpment_ The Owner would prefer the original proposal. -22- Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OF APR 11 1985 eutwompier • ° TO. BE COMPLETED BY APPL IC• E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OF TUKWILA. CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM .0 N EPIC FILE ff083 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; BLDG 1 1 PLNG P.W. FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT fu()66 d!6 /1,,1OY�J (e0,04/0i,/ aerA, LAG LOCATION /3Q.25 /Z-W eG�..-YIU(2'J FILE N 0. °- 4 O5 .j DATE TRANSMITTED bVP�'�8S RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Gf�G/i85 RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE WILL AFFORD A BETTER STGHT PTrTTTRR Fnm 1.4nTORTCT ENTERING AND LEAVING LOT AND SHOULD RESULT IN A BETTER TRAFFTC MF.RGF THE TWO PARKING STALLS PROJECTED FOR THE'AREA 111YEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THE NEW ENTRY MAY PRESENT A PROBLEM WITH THE TWO -WAY TRAFFIC CONFIGURATION.' 4/8/85 4/ DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM Apr ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM •N $x083 EPIC c,20745" FILE /2/67-06.9-R5- .-- 'R5- TO; n BLDG PLNG P.W. / FIRE ,,/ POLICE P & &'�R� PROJECT f? G)-66 e �i6 �!' /�O��J l oa -tzt Q�/ L�� L�U X1-60 :��Ai 6v /A LOCATION 1' q.5-- ,./..frite i�YIO FILE NO. a° -06-8.5- DATE TRANSMITTED o9/ �f /g,5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT I-i nTv >✓o m o D o rrI Wla-L c u 11 ( • cuc i L\ w i LLJ NET 1 s C \ , t H cs Pcz(xs3 l \\ X10 t—� )1\ 7C- 10714 �cLL u ti� C� (A\A u MQ l Tl LIT (ES 1 L , RE t)( (-u k Ftyk DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM Wor ,5.t pGL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; PROJECT BLDG PLNG P.W. LOCATION DATE TRANSMITTED tg/p/8S STAFF COORDINATOR FIRE 410N Oa O 3 EPIC ,,*71.5- FILE --0 'g POLICE (j P & R (Aoa -rot ��ii a4'' &GC�i�C�t. J 617jh VT FILE N0. --0�85 y /6//57 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 1(/o ern/M DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 C'ITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL .PERMIT. SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM ON 8a 083 EPIC 10745— FILE -0/P'15- T0; [a'BLDG LNG P.W. [ FIRE J POL PROJECT _ f LOCATION 1 Q2�,�/i_be Gt.4Yk20,,, J FILE NO. -66 85- DATE TRANSMITTED 3 eF/BS RESPONSE REQUESTED BY G#G/ /8j RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT (-e5-69c:7 / i re IV - r i / - - -- - -Iii — Ae COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM. ifor itf6L. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTINVFORM TO; PROJECT BLDG PLNG P.W. few-6L �1`L6 at/Li/0219 LOCATION /, .,5-- /L.t GtA/6 k) DATE TRANSMITTED s/01,5-- STAFF COORDINATOR oN l/�VO3 EPIC ,207'15-- FILE -10'85- FIRE POLICE P & R (.foal -rct� 1/-6 C u4J nei Vi FILE NO. -7% 5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 `'Y OF TUKWI LA, CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM !if-or itp6'-- ENVIRONMENTALAEVIEW ROUTING FORM TO; PROJECT LOCATION BLDG PLNG P.W. f&w1L l3Q2i �Lr�Lf Gl.K�o�•�t ) DATE TRANSMITTED 3/p,F/675 STAFF COORDINATOR FIRE .N EPIC FILE ff 0 ,Y3 0-0b-g5- - -a5 POLICE (A004101/ frp FILE NO. -06-85- 6////8.1 P &R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS .REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 1- 7 -O5 :i • • t,r> (� � - CITY OF TUKWILA °* lam, Central Permit System 7 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM RECEIVED CITY OF TUB MAR 2 8 1985 BUMS 0 PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: D BSIP ❑ SHORT D SUBDIVISION P - _DSHORELINE PERMIT PRO PMUD: OCONDITIONAL ❑UNUSE55. VARIANCE ZONING 6JAMENDMENT anuary Leasing Company i) APPLICANT :. NAME steven Ness Partner ADDRESS P.O. Box 17409, Portland, Oregon BAR INTERURBAN TELEPHONE ( 800 ) 547 -0703 zip 97217 2) PROP. OWNER: NAME Same as above TELEPHONE ( ADDRESS 3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 13925 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington ZIP SECTION lI: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. To add additional paving on site and /or 8 ) provide a new driveway entrance to the site. ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM June 1985 To July 1985 WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET CROSS 1.25 acres EASEMENTS B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL { FLOORS 2 INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT O MEZZANINE TOTAL GROSS 15,716 INCLUDES: D BASEMENT MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA SITE UTILIZATION: EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES ZONING DESIGNATION C -2 COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 10,4820 10,482 0 LANDSCAPE AREA 25, 000 ❑ 23, 000 ❑ PAVING AREA 18,5000 20,500 ❑ TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE. 36 44 - COMPACT SIZE 10 .11 - HANDICAPPED SIZE 1 1 TOTAL LOADING SPACES 1 1 AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA 2% AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 1% IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? Q YES t:NO SZCT:ON III. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT" I , 704[20 e.tA V e .. Yov -i -tnev , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE CONTRACT PURCHASER OR1OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HER WITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE -70 )T-S-c-x PM/ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEF THIS DATE BELIEF. 75(a1-tA • .' ! 4/,i NOTARY PlJ�L 1 1 N AND FOR( THE v ATE OF`` • RESIDING AT in v,+'I� 1� l G CI PLA V' c( L1 LA- (SIGNATURE: OF C 1 9S-5— TRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER) VICINITY MAP \ \ .Axiisting'Natural Vegetation lo Remain._ •• - , _ — • - _ . • • _ - I - I I 1 •/\ \S \--Existing Pa king S RECEIVED CITY OF TUICIARUI MAR 2 8 1985 NUM OW PROJECT INFO iTISt Pl.ts Urn, rl..o • 10,111: : EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING 11,11•5 1•••■•••• t.lat WM1.114: Si•lio S.3 ZONING NEAR SITE isting Pa king Stalls /Mt, Imo His, Wel., • %,..• INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH SITE PLAN "A" graphic scale Nora SITE REVISIONS TO FEWEL & ASSOCIATES Date s-xs-ses Diawn Pro," • PLANT LIST INTS • 10 r1rctr•tur MaNn Orr NM, H•ta...NU. pyr INtro Otto 1,0.1 c1y•••• Car PIMMININ is Pr mv.e•rta Loral NOTE: ▪ CON. t...a. M:. MR , 10▪ 171717110 , Pr nftwonwn 01•117.1. fry, 111.7.110T 1770717M SMITION 11M1 INV[17 MIN NON, � [i \Natural Vegetdtitui.jo Remain • ;,f1.1 a. s� is rp -��•— i EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING MO railvito 1 IT. ej +1? eft 1 il!II� I/► 1 , I ��►1 1101044.42221,if • hPore INTERURBAN MENUS SOUTH LANDSCAPE PLAN "A" graphic scale i b Notes Revised Roped SITE REVISIONS TO FEWEL & ASSOCIATES D'+8 Dar snn Drawn steer 11 VICINITY MAP PROJECT INFO ZONING NEAR SITE • N, I xisting Natal al Veg;1 :num 1 0--14-ermin - . - • - 1 1 1 1 I —Existing Parking Stalls-__/ • EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING z Lyekling Area INTERURBAN /VENUE SOUTH SITE PLAN "B" graphic scale New Driveway Entrance 4. °Iv doam tw.suanl -16 Reaped SITE REVISIONS TO FEWEL .& ASSOCIATES Drawing Date • /5- to, Drawn Propect 5Feet C2 Hansen Hansen & f- )son 1006 a var a■e • t>o b, • Sumner wa 98390 • 2.06 863 8116 • \� \ \\ \ \ fasting'NaEntal Vegetation lo Remain PLANT LIST TIFIS Wow tarrAnow• CIVOCM. met EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING • dow 145.041 'coral Prtn.u• NOTE: MI MP MMOIC, AIMM Rif 11•310. MY MAMMA 10=1111•S NM A IM GIMIMMTIND ANTI. PCP OM 110 NOM. MOM C17.13111M. INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH LANDSCAPE PLAN "B" graphic scale Prclect SITE REVISIONS TO FEWEL & ASSOCIATES Doe 3-tv -so Drawn Project HECINIffilik WM" MAR 2 81985 NUNS OM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Alex Pompel Contro tVo. 55-3 • Epic File No. 207 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 0Ni Site Revisions to Fewel and Associates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Northwest Food Brokers P.U. Box 17409 , Portland, Oregon 97217 4. Date checklist prepared: March 27, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Paving work proposed to tie dome June -July of 1985 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila Bldg. Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E .requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Proposal will provide 2,000 sf of additional paving for parking on the existing site of an existing 15,000 sf offj.ce bldg. All existing landscaping from the previous development will be reused in the existing area. This project will provide better traffic flow on site and provide additional parking. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Existing Building is located at 13925 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila, Wa. Between I -405 and I -5 on Interurban Ave. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. Legal Description: Lots 2 & 3 of Tukwila Short Plat No. 80 -36 -55 as recorded under Auditor's File No. 8102020582 records of King County Washington in portion of the NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 Section 14, T23N, R4E. Subject to a 15.00 foot wide storm easement over the No rtheasterl' corner of said Lot 3. Subject to a slope easement over the Northeasterly 10.00 feet of said Lot 3, as recorded under Auditor's File #6390811. Subject to a sewer easement over the Northeasterly 10.00 feet of said Lot 3, as recorded under Auditor's file t 5683661. Subject to a mutual parking easement (undefinable) as recorded under Auditor's file No. 8105120686. Subject to per easements "A" and "B" (undefinable) as recorded under AF #81H200630. Subject to a Utility easement over the Northeasterly feet, thereof, as recorded under AF #8108270528. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other 90o flat with a steep slope at the rear. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. soft sand over glacial till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some leveling of existing soil. Local gravel ballast will be brought in for paving. (20cyd.) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 6O' Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Redistribtute existing landscaping materials. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, •generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some Construction vehicle exhaust. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 1 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? .If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Paving will have storm runoff into exitsting storm drainage system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No.. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None removed_ All nursery landscaping - materials will be reused. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Reuse existing landscaping. Leave natural hillside alone. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: No fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. No additional sources will be used. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NnnP_ 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? No affect will occur. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction vehicles from 8:ooa.m. to 4:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Office bldg. Fx i st ing I411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? None. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 50 Existing. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nnne_ 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Meets all city codes. 4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 35 ft. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nona. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. IIIEvaluation for • Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Non P_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Golf Course. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities' to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None, Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Ave. provides access to site b. Is the site currently served-by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance.to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 57. Eliminate none. 40 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If . so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities Cir ilities currentl vailable at the site: natural as, at't ephone, sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No additional utilities. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: .TD BE COMPLETED BY APPLICSr • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at 'a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? III Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAP • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: