Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-268-85 - CITY OF TUKWILA - MCMICKEN HEIGHTS ANNEXATIONMCMICKEN HEIGHTS ANNEXATION REZONE SOUTH OF SR518, EAST OF 42ND, NORTH OF164TH ST. EPIC 268 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal rezone of King County zoning classifications from RS -7200 to R -1 -7.2 Single Family Residential, from BN Neighborhood Business to C -1 General Commercial and from RM -900 and RM -2400 Multiple Dwelling Maximum and Medium Density to P -O Professional and Office. Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any That area generally bounded by SR 518, 51st Avenue S., S. 164th Street and 42nd Avenue South. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -268, 85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. xQ There is no comment period for this DNS . This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for a5 -days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date f- It' SS Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Nall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low density residential and commercial to an office classification Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any. 16234, 16228 and 16218 42nd Avenue South, and 4230 S. 164th Street. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-268.85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS). is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Ex There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Ufficial Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date Li-- i8' 75- Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. • CITY OF TUKWILA • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG n PLNG 0 P.W. 0 FIRE Q POLICE LJ P & R PROJECT rrignicwv iqzeiput5i /2e uYZ) LOCATION ?U ( 9 w/Y, E y z4 -11/,-- FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 'y -385 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY y /o-8S STAFF COORDINATOR � L/_ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU, WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 4f 7 Y COMMENTS PREPARED BY A-07.,_--177- K;2.;/'/ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT LOCATION ota % �s�i' � ��Y, Fe1,� ��� 0(1 /1 1(;irt 7PITE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 4-/-3-1:1 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Z/-/04_) STAFF COORDINATOR 062e,e RESPONSE RECEIVED CN 6 EPIC FILES BLDG [1 PLNG (1 P.W. 1 1 FIRE ri POLICE -1Q1-ein9,(1Lf/ (� P & R • THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 0//rS COMMENTS PREPARED BY*, C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG n PLNG P.W. FIRE n POLICE ri P & R PROJECT /21Unr(j'jJZV ` ek. /Q /-: / �,��✓�!�C l � �ezi»2z) 7Srp'IL64-ii:i LOCATION � ZC rGi (1 ) �`%�' x, F ?? �Z/7a NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C' /i 4.,) EPIC (265',5,/.5-- 65' FILE (:(5--/ 1 DATE TRANSMITTED x-/-5-g5" STAFF COORDINATOR e,, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 3� ,47e - /74))) I7 yW sue. 15- 5 5' 17 14?‘ /L - Aid A*, C. 60401 T (7 (f/ ,, D,e9kvA/7f RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA . APR 8 198 ()Oil PUBUC WORKS DEPT. DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM J BLDG ] PLNG n P.W. FIRE (l POLICE r--1 P & R inV/10/J,I7) 1Q1-e.19-(,1±5/ Peun-e) LOCAT ION .3)tc 'rte (3.19j49,,77 E7i < L fi6I /r O'-- FILE NO. 57� / �/e DATE TRANSMITTED ' ' -g ' ?5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4/H/04,) PROJECT • CN • EPIC 269...C- FILE 5,5- / %F STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU. WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ?\c5 COry .E a DATE y - 9 -CRS- COMMENTS PREPARED BY 0.4 C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • N EPIC ,145< FILE 5',. / '/e ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: = BLDG (l PLNG P.W. [-1 FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT (171 /0/)j' ' ICS. /cp(i -/- ' (i,_/;' c/ ,&?iSY✓ )_ U)nL) LOCATION )Uei^ }(y,1i' -- .`,' /Y,UF1).:��'I VLI ? %); 1(9/r -- N0. 5 %�/' DATE TRANSMITTED '-/'.5 -g5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY y /G STAFF COORDINATOR 0�%('l THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT AN AITNF.Y'ATT(1N nF TTTTC MAGNITUDE WTLL HAVE SOME IMPACT ON THE LEVEL -OF POLTCF SERVTCR, PARTTCiTT,ART.Y RF4PONSF TTM"F, Tk OUGHOTJT THE ENTIRE CITY. AS STATISTICAL INFORMATION RRCOMRS AVATT.ART.R A mnRF TN -nEPTH STUDY WUJ1 BE CONDUCTED AND RECOMMENDATIONS TOWARD MATNTATNTNC THR PRFRPNT T PVFT 4 OF POLICE SERVICES WILL .BE PUT FORTH. 4 -8 -85 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 410 • CN Y-1d EPIC FILE c/5: /!3'R ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTI FORM TO: 0 BLDG PLNG n R.W. ( jFIRE E1 POLICE [i P & R PROJECT /72(ilra a 0 %4/' 1J , ai//V Ai67(f)1.-/ LOCATION ,60t.001) (%l) ,; , Fi ( `7 � ,, y� ✓�t� -C�F I LE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED '<-/-.5-8,5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY y /U 8.) STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU. WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 . CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System ;TER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR :.ASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REOUES :EPTED FOR PROCESSING. . • EREYEM APR 31965 CITY OF TUKWILA IA! DEPT. 40 ail( OF �I't� lfitl� APR 3 1985 MC LETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ECTION 1: GENERAL DATA YPE OF APPLICATION: BSIP QSHORT P LAT OCOND I T I ONAL USE APPLICANT: NAME ADDRESS >_) PROP. OWNER: NAME 3 QS RE I E BAR Q SUED 1 V 1 S 1 ON PERMIT ❑UNCLASS. USE City of Tukwila VARIANCE 6200 Southcenter Boulevard attached CHG. OF ZONING TELEPHONE nICOMP. PLAN ULIIAMENDMENT ( 206 ) 433 -1848 ZIP 98188 TELEPHONE ( ADDRESS PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) ZIP SECTION 11: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE ERIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. Rezone of recently annexed. County zoning classifications to Tukwila zoning classification TO 5). ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? DYES ❑ NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: Change from King 7) PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: NET 185(approx CROSS EASEMENTS INCLUDES: D BASEMENT G MEZZANINE INCLUDES: O BASEMENT DMEZZANINE TOTAL /f FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE -COMPACT SIZE . HAND I CAPPED S I ZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 8) IS THI SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL MAP? BB YES ❑ NO EXISTING PROPOSED RS -7200 R -1 -7.2 RM -900 P -0 RM -2400 ❑ P -0 ❑ B -N ❑ C -1 ❑ RS -7200 ❑ R -2 (Possible) Single Family to Commercial to Public Facilities Parks & Open Space CONSIDERATION ON THE NOTES Single Family and Office Commercial and Office same same CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE SECTION III: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT 1 AM THE 1, CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF T}�NPROPERTY NED�AND THE MN�FORMA�ON1 HEREW II THrSUBNl1 TTEDEAREREN GOING STATEMENTS AND AN -'WEBS HER ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME DAY OF . 19 THIS NOTARY ►'tJ L 1 r: 1 N AND FOR THE STATE OF WASH 1 NGTON X (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER) A • CITY OF:TUKWILA Central P . _- RECEIVED CRY OF 'i't ►'M.A APR 3 1985 S C H E D U L E 11111M DEW MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT U SL CHANGE OF ZONING' EXISTING RS-/200 RM 900 ZONING BJ RM 2400 * COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION REQUESTED ZONING R -I -7.2 P -0 C -1 Possibly R -2 SITE IN CITY LIMITS? yes PROPOSED USE IF REZONE APPROVED existing uses *Single Family Residential, Commercial, Park 6 upen Space, & Public Facilities EXISTING USE AND CLASSIFICATION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: RS -72M -1800, COMP. PLAN DES1G. Major land uus-to the north is SR518 whi NORTH RM1800P,.RM2400 Single Family, Commercial acts.as a barrier to adjacent land uses SOUTH 'BN & RS -7200 Single Family, Commercial EAST C -2 & R -1 -12.0 Single Family Single family residences WEST PM1800, RS7200, BN Single Family, Commercial ch ,ZSCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOUR REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONING CLASSIFICATION SATISFIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.84.030 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECES- SARY). 1) THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE AND LAND USE POLICY PLAN, THE PROVISION OF THE CITY ZONING CODE AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST. No, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map would have to be amended 2 ) RESPONSE: THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS APPROPRIATE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE ZONING AND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES (IN ADDITION TO THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE, SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SHOULD BE REFERENCED). RESPONSE: Yes 3) IF THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING IS NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN, THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE IS CITED IN SUPPORT OF THE NEED FOR THE REQUESTED • RECLASSIFICATION. RESPONSE: The change is requested because the uses which are existing would support new classifications and due to the annexation from unincorporated King County in Tukwila, it becomes necessary for the area to be rezoned to comply with TMC 18. CITY OF TUK APR 3 1985 Central Permit S stem A MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPL 1 T I soTLK DF TUKWITA LAR�NG DEPT. CEMEEP F =MA 1985 S C H E D U L E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Commercial possible office EXISTING COMP ples17 & S'I C�d1lf�T I ON S i n g l e F a m . R e spROPOSED COMP. PLAN DES I GMAT I ON Me d . Density EXISTING ZONINGRM -2400, RM 90 OpOSED USE Those which are existing, no change in use propc RE EXISTING USE AND CLASSIFICATION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: ZONE COMP. PLAN DESIG. NORTH SOUTH EAST • WEST SEE SCHEDULE H -USE SE IDENTIFY THOSE POLICIES IN THE TUKWI:LA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH YOU FEEL SERVE TO JUSTIFY - - -- -THE PROPOSED compRgHENsrvE PLAN AMENDMENT, AND ANALYZE THOSE POLICIES AS THEY RELATE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. POL I CY Ii PAGE i'I RELEVANCE 1 24 The R -1 -7.2 zoning district will help to maintain the character of steep slopes by limiting economic potential indevelopfng land. 3 46 No spot zone is being proposed. 5 46 By continuing the zoning of single family residential, several non- conforming uses will be prevented from expanding and if left vacant for a period of time will eventually be prevented from existing. 1 66 The P.O. district will be an effective buffer between residential and GOAL commercial uses. 1 12 Creating Tukwila zoning classifications for newly annexed property promos the regulation of land use and community growth 3 12 Rezoning the annexation area facilitates planned expansion of the City's - corporate boundaries 4 12. As closely as possible the proposed classifications will imitate the RESIDENTIAL existing uses and the standards that have existed in the area 1 17 The proposed zoning will preserve the pleasantness of a viable single. family neighborhood 1 n2rat2nnn�n RECEIVED CRY OF TUKW$ L APR .3 1985 • APR 3 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA vi ®N1dINO DEPT: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila Control No. v--Ogg Epic File No. ,2193 -45-- Fee $100.00 Receipt No. N/A LIST McMicken Heights Annexation Rezone 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Assistant Planner, 433 -1848 Moira Bradshaw, 4. Date checklist prepared: March 25, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: - City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Completion of rezoning by Summer 1985 . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future annexations and subsequent rezonings are possible in adjacent portions of unincorporated King County at the request of the property owners. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Checklist was prepared for the annexation request (EPIC 236 -84) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There may be building permit applications with the King County Building and Land Divisio • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Tukwila Planning Commission and City Council approval of the Zoning and Compre- hensive Plan amendments. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that 'ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone of the McMicken Heights annexation area from King County to Tukwila Zoning - classifications: RS -7200 to R -1 -7.2 Single family residential BN to C -1 General Commercial IN -W019 RM -900 to P 0 Professional Office RS -7200 to , R- 2(possibly) TwO—T5Trilly resiTntiaal 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Beginning at the intersection of the Tukwila City limits and the south right -of -way margin of State Highway 518; thence westerly along said south right - of -way margin of Stat Highway 518 to the east right -of -way margin. of 42nd Ave South; thence south along said east right -of -way margin of South 164th Street; then_c_e_st along said SOlitll right -of -way margin of South 164th Street to the Tukwila City limits; thence northerly along_said Tukwila City limits to the south right -of -way margin of State_Highwav_5l8 and to the beginning. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally-sensitive? A portion of the area proposed for the rezone is designated as environmentally sensitive. • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Because of the size of the area, there are several different types of terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 43% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Surface soil.is brown gravelly silty sand (loose to medium dense moist). At a depth of 5 to 10 feet the soil is gray silt with sand lenses and rust stains (stiff and moist) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction proposed g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A • • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No measures. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None, since new construction is not being proposed. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally • describe. Adjacent city streets and SR 518 impact air quality_ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach 'avai)able plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface -water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate- the source of fill.material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- titis, if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. . r 1 Do not believe so. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged ' to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate _quan- tities, if known. Any discharge would be from existing structures sand -um- uses. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system.(s) are expected to serve. The area is currently served by septic systems. There_wi1 d_be approximately 312 domestic sewage tanks serving 813 residents. Sixe businesses are aTos served by septic systems. Possible drixeway and parking 1R7-surface water runoff from existing single family development could also occur. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Single family residendences, a community center, several offices a restaurant and a preschool discharge into whatier facilities exist.nn the street system. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface'. waters? If so, generally describe. PerlaAas_o'1- -f •u o'obil-s . d'f- ilizer chem'cals from landscaping and lawn maintenance. Due to t e use of septic tanks typicar domestic sewerage. could enter ground or surface water. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: none .4. Plants a. ;Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture _ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other . water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if :any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: . ,birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: miscellaneous common varieties mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels, rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: none Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Existing single family residences, professional offices preschool, restaurant and communi ty center tie xi sting FcTTitTes from various companies. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No 1 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire, medic 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from adjacent streets, 1 -5 and-7W 518. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. / The noise level for the majority of the site will be at a minimum level and the type associated with single family neighborhoods. The southwest corner of the subject site will generate more intense types of noise and at different hours due to the commercial related uses. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None, already exist. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent. properties? Current uses are: 1) Single .family residences & mobile homes 6) King County Community Park 2) A duplex 7) A preschool 3) A group home for 6 residents 8) A community center with multiple uses. 4) A restaurant 5) Medical offices and hair salon b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures on the site are typical of the land uses listed in 8a. The community center leases a building that was a former Highline School building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County RS -7200 single family, RM -2400 multiple dwelling medium density, RM -9(D multiple dwelling maximum density /restrictive service & BN neighborhood busine. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single family residential, park, public facilities and commercial If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? A g. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, a strip of land in the northeast quadrant is shown as environmeni.dlly sensitive on the comprehensive land use plan map. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Residential population of the area is 813. The employee population would be approximately j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:The proposed Tukwila Zoning classifications will be as nearly identical to existing King—County designations while attempting to reflect the existing land uses of theta. • Evaluation for Agency Use only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing?_ None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None' 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 25 feet b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Maintain comparable zoning standards and. regulations. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?. What time of day would it mainly occur? None b.. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. .What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and :glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? King County Community Park, Crestview and Tukwila's proposed- Crestview Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to {the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nine 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Public streets in the area include 42nd, 43rd, 44th, 45th, 46th, 47th, 48th,, 49th Avenues So., So. 156th, 158th, 160th, 162nd, 161st, 164th Streets, So. 163rd P1, 45th Place. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit route 240 travels along_SSo. 170th, 51st Ave. So. and So. 160th Street; and route 170 travels Military Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No more than existing. Evaluation for Agency Use only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak .volumes would occur. No change in trips will be generated by the proposed rezone. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, there-will be an increase need for Tukwila's Police and Fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available a natural gas sanitary sewer, septJ system other. the site: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed rezoning will create no changes in the environment. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Resources will not change due to the proposed rezoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4.. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No affect. Situation will remain the same for the environmentally sensitive area. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? There would be a change in the type and requirements of certain land uses. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Match existing land use and King County zoning with comparable Tukwila zoning classifications. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6.. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such.demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objectives of the proposed rezoning is to change the King County zoning designation to a comparable Tukwila zoning classification for newly annexed property. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The alternatives of the project are the possible zoning classifications other than those currently proposed: R -1 -7.2 PO C -1 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: 1) Possible alternative would be to create several spot zoning districts to make several non - conforming uses conforming. 2) Another alternative would be to propose zoning classifications that are less restrictive, allowing higher densities and intenser uses. 3) Another alternative would be to propose more restrictive zoning classifications thereby limiting uses and decreasing permissable densities. This would create many noncontorming situations. The proposed course is the preferred course because it minimizes nonconformity while maintaining present standards of use and density.