Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-27-90 - MCDONALD'S - REMODEL AND ADDITIONMCDONALD'S REMODEL / ADDITION 15210 PACIFIC HWY. S. (T.I.B.) EPIC -27 -90 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKW /LA, WASHINGTON 98188 November 14, 1990 PHONE # (206) 433. 1800 McDonald's Corporation 10220 N.E. Points Drive Suite 300 Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE: McDONALD'S RESTAURANT 90 -13 -DR & EPIC -27 -90 Dear Mr. Perryea.: Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor This letter is in response to your written request, to withdraw your Design Review and SEPA Checklist. I have closed both the 90- 13-DR and EPIC -27 -90 files. No refunds will be issued because of the amount of staff time used on both reviews. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 431 -3670. Thank You Darren 1 - on Assistant Planner cc: J. Pace, Senior Planner L. Anderson, City Attorney D TE INrT ACTIVI'1l LOG COMMENTS 17411/WWWW-4111111VAIMP ENVIRONnr �''NTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EPIC.�� - 9a TQ f ..� 4 x � 4> dui dfng Y` ....,••• . Planning >a : Pub Wks ..i.: : Y \�:.A> /t4, \'L1:', OV y , 7 SI >? AlCe :1 °f re�< ' 0 Ponce r Parke /t eC • PROJECT /47v-)9A/./2/...c �n ADDRESS 45-e;0 7,9e/tG i/ S'. DATE TRANSMITTED /01,25/1 i STAFF COORDINATOR e attaohed environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review: a ommeiltbelow°toi advise the• responsible officials regarding the threshold dotermirlat,on. envlrOnmental:review file is.avaiiable in the Planning Department through the above staff; oor'dinator. ;Comments regarding the project you wish carried.to the Planning Commission, • Board Of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in:the commen( section below: RESPONSE REQUESTED BY / 012M0 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Date: Comments prepared by; , 091141011 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IENVIRON NTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM y, } guitding *� < D Planning )PubWks PROJECT j%i p ")9,¢ /L.D.I.S .5re /Rl3sI / ADDRESS /So? /D P41Co 4 Akir "C- DATE TRANSMITTED /02..25/9-O STAFF COORDINATOR e P DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED EPIC: 29 - )� �Police� °f parks / Rao RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10129 1 e • attaobed environmental `checklist. 'was received regarding this .project:i Piease� rQview" omneilt:below.to: advise the .responsible official` regarding :the threshold determination :envirOnmentai.reviow file is available in the Planning Department through th.e •above staf oorditlator.:•.Comrnents regardingothe project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, oard ot:Adjustnient and City Council should be submitted in the comment section bolo ITEM I1/e COMMENT Xfike 5-'e.ept, itq' a,ydc, g/k, A 1nee 4c( 0e5-‘ a ./625 u l7 of Vice kP S' Ala d ilte V 0._,en14. y v 475 f Date: ) -90 Comments prepared by: , 09114109 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMEOTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM PROJECT /,&7-y)Ati,_c /4.5-75ipe,/,,e)-474 — ADDRESS /5/,0 1/9K94.41d A4'y Ss' DATE TRANSMITTED /02.725/9 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /DI 29/9D STAFF COORDINATOR D.Ae DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 7'1 . The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review a comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination The envirOhMental.revlew file is available in the Planning Department through the above staif ‘•coordinator, Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning CoremissiOn,.. Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted In the comment section below • • •• . . . . . ITEM COMMENT Date: Comments prepared by: , 091141011 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND • ildnIn iglihalar9AliCHEIKLIST CITY OF TUKVViLA PLANNING DEPT. ConSl No. _ Epic File No. Fee— WO--96 Receipt No./ .7&2447 42 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: McDonald's Remodel` /.Addition 2. Name of applicant: McDonald's Corporation /Keith Perryea 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10220 NE POINTS DRIVE, KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 827 -9 /uu 4. Date checklist prepared: 9/14/90 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CONSTRUCTION START LATE JANUARY 1991, COMPLETE BY MARCH 1991. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NOT AT THIS TIME 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE KNOWN 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly opting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA, BUILDING PERMIT BY THE CITY -OF TUKWILA, HEALTH DEPARTMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY KING COUNTY. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. WE PROPOSE TO ADD A 504 SQUARE FOOT STORAGE AND FREEZER ADDITION TO THE EXISTING McDonald's AT 15210 PACIFIC HWY S.(TOTAL SITE SIZE IS APPROXIMATELY 77,000 SQUARE FEET) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and .topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 15210 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH./ 2 BLOCKS NORTH OF WASHINGTON 516 ON PACIFIC HWY. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T B.' ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat WITH A SLOPE ON THE SOUTH rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, - ker SIDE b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. SAND, CLAY. GRAVEL d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NDNE KN_oWN e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or ,grading, proposed. Indicate— source of fill. NO CHANGE TO THE EXISTING GRADES ARE PROPOSED f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NONE ANTICIPATED g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 70% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: FILTER FABRIC AS A TEMPORARY MEASURE MAY BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED 2. Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION /WATERED DOWN AS REQUIRED TO KEEP DUST TO A MINIMUM b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: AS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO 4 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NOT APPLICABLE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated NONE KNOWN volume of discharge. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quan- tities, if known. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. THE EXISTING RESTAURANT IS ON THE VALLEY VIEW SEWER SYSTEM c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ALL RUN OFF WILL RUN INTO AN EXISTING STORM SYSTEM ON SITE • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: EXISTING ON SITE STORM SYSTEM WITH OUTFLOW AS DESIGNED TO KING COUNTY-STAMM 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other —1,,shrubs ,L grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A GRASSY AREA NEXT TO THE RFTAUR NA T WWTT T RF RFMO EI TO 1AKE WAY FOR THE A11DTTTfN c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: EXISTING LANDSCAPING SHOULD BE MORE THAN ADEQUATE 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: NONE mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: NONE fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: NONE b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NOT KNOWN d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NOT APPLICABLE Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ELECRICTY TO RUN ADDITIONAL LIGHTING NOT ALREADY THERE. (FREEZER IS REPLACING AN EXISTING UNIT- - NO ADDITIONAL ENERGY REQUIRED) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: BUILDING ADDITION DESIGNED TO MEET ENERGY CODE. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT - -ALL REQUIRED SAFETY PRACTICES WILL BE FOLLOWED '1'U MINIMIZE HEALTH HAZARD POTENTIAL 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. FIRE DEPT, AMBULANCE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: FOLLOW REQUIRED SAFETY i= PRACTluis Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. CONSTRUCTION NOISE -- CONSTRUCTION TIME LIMITED TO THOSE TIMES (DAYLIGHT HOURS THROUGH 10 PM AS REQULRLD BY TUKWILA) LONG TERM - -NO ADDITIONAL NOISE .ABOVE THAT WHICH ALREADY EXISTS. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: LIMITING CONSTRUCTION TIMES TO THOSE PERSCRIBED BY THE CITY FOR LOUD CUNS'1'RUC'1ION ACTIVITY. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? SITE = RESTAURANT -- PROPERTY TO NORTH :ACROSS STREET = SERVICE STATION PROPERTY TO—S.1 =' 1•A TY - -TO THE EAST = APARTMENTS b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. UNKNOWN c. Describe any structures on the site. • AN EXISTING McDONALD'S RFSTAURANT, A TRASH ENCLOSURE, AND A SM'T.T STnRA(F. RTTTT,DTNG -- -THE SMALL STORAGE BUILDING WILL RF T1FMfT TSHFT) AS A PART OF THIS PROPOSAL • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A. SMALL STORAG BUILDING/ APPROX 650 SQUARE FEET e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (-COMMERCIAL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? COMMERCIAL 9. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NONE ABOVE THOSE THAT ALREADY WORK IN THE RESTAURANT j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: USE FITS WITHIN ALLOWED ZONING • 41/ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? APPROX 16' PAINTED SLUMP STONE EXTERIOR WITH WOOD TRIM b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NA • 411, Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NO ADDITIONAL LIGHT AND GLARE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? no c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NA 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? NOT KNOWN b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or onext to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NAc• 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. PACIFIC HWY S., 152nd STREET - - -ALL EXISTING ACCESS POINTS WOULD REMAIN AS THEY EXIST. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YES - -METRO ON PACIFIC HWY SOUTH =:200' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? ATOTAL_OF 79 PARKING SPACES WOULD BE PROVIDED- - 66 EXIST CURRENTLY. WE WOULD PICK UP THE DIFFERENCE THROUGH RESTRIPING THE EXSITING LOT AS WELL AS INSTALLING PARKING AT THE LOCATION OF THE DEMOLISHED STORAGE BUILDING • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE IN ADDITION TO WHAT THE RPOJECT ALREADY GENERATES g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: NA 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE • • 16. Utilities a. Cir_c -1•- ities— cur -,e•tl available atth site: -.l- ectr_icitf atural gas, water' use service., elepho e, sane a se e , septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ALL UTILITIES REQUIRED ALREADY EXIST C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best my knowledge. I understand that the agency is relying on them to make its deci .o of Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only