Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-270-85 - LPN ARCHITECTS - TUKWILA WEST OFFICE BUILDINGTUKWILA WEST OFFICE BUILDING MIDLAND DRIVE & ANDOVER PARK WEST EPIC 270 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 12,215 square foot office building Proponent LPN Architects Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Midland Drive and Andover Park West. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -270-85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for i5 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 14— 1 g'g5 Signature . You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at Z'il:y 1, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG P.W. FIRE • CN EPIC FILE 1 POLICE I" 1 P & R PROJECT 7-64,4 / /d W/i or-6,z - eidg. LOCATION ✓I7S/d,/at9( , .Af1,4-P, FILE NO. `0/A DATE TRANSMITTED 4/4-?,- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /6 $,5 STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 5-- /7 ---5 COMMENTS PREPARED BY fir,- f - C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • . CN .F5-0q7 EPIC 9%6'85 - FILE `x /17 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG ri PLNG P.W. I (FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT T6(.40/ 4i 7,.JA.5f: 7Ct', 6L/61 - 41 "aii, l - LOCATION ✓44/ , , 1/Ifi FILE NO. `i///4 DATE TRANSMITTED (/-Q- ?7 STAFF COORDINATOR QV RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD• DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU 'WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM, TO: I /( BLDG PROJECT LOCATION 471Adia,od DATE TRANSMITTED 4/-Q15-- PLNG P.W. ( FIRE • CN $,-jq7 EPIC POLICE P &P STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT / /12 it) Je or co C -'e y an-4(c to k. 'e 41 g am^ G s , k7 e , yR,ds d, 4`i-r Co de reimov+cd dn0 ViE.fre X paeiZ'a, ce .e.tety7 ,o.pne-r-e-rtriar DATE 4/ 2//i75 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN (/q7 EPIC 976'S5- FILE `1//11 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: in BLDG 1---1 PLNG 1741P.W. FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT 7-6(4 / /QL W, D�'' Qi d / - G y- �-�� /721/7 LOCATION a/ d a/2,1bLe> FILE NO. `11`,4 DATE TRANSMITTED 4/-Q1• STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ;,- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /Arc. Ls - ' en-Li lft. Q • DATE, // COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM • CN U.-OQ7 EPIC 97645- FILE `r%% TO: (j BLDG [ 1 PLNG [ P.W. FIRE [—[ POLICE P & R PROJECT 72).1,1.04L, W, Dr-f7'6 , [�xt f&JrI - L'Ve LOCATION 4721.661/41d 424,) FILE NO. W`q DATE TRANSMITTED 4/-q157 '5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1/ /1p 85- STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT Nc Oa itt ew DATE 1- fj- ¢ s- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN 8.97 EPIC FILE `/VP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: F-1 BLDG fl PLNG n P.W. FIRE 1 POLICE P & R PROJECT 70,,40/lQJ t"-,--171/! LOCATION ✓y17,/(, J(jt7d / % DATE TRANSMITTED ij-Q- 7 STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT.BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. _COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH. CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 4D LANDSCAPING DESIGN...SOD BERMS AND PLANTING SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION . SIGHTLINE IMPACTS ON POLICE PATROL. 14A DRIVEWAY LANDSCAPING SHOULD PROVIDE MAXIMUM SIGHTLINES PARTICLARY ONTO ANDOVER WEST. 15A IMPACT UPON POLICE SERVICES, 60 NEW EMPLOYEES IN AREA, WOULD BE IIINIMAL. PROBABLY OF GREATER IMPACT WOULD BE DEPENDANT UPON TENANT AND TYPE CLIENTELE THEY WILL ATTRACT. 4/10/85 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc. Royce A. Berg A.I.A., 114 Vine Street (2nd & Vine) Seattle, WA 9 •6) 6 4- April 8, 1985 HAND DELIVERED City of Tukwila Planning and Permits 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: One Story Tukwila Office Building Andover Park Way West and Midland Drive Dear Staff: 1... L .ii.i.OV.ii) ' APR 31985 i ct. -A 1"•..0', vr, DENT. , We are enclosing the environmental checklist to start the SEPA review for this project which is in a properly zoned parcel on Andover Park Way West. The working drawings are being completed and will be submitted for permit within the next two weeks. If you have any questions or need any additional information please call. Enclosed for your use are: 1. SEPA application fee — $100.00 2. 10 Sets reduced site plan, floor plan and elevations 3. 2 Sets full size prints, plans and elevations with progress print of site plan. Site rely, oy Pr sident LP ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS RAB: cpm cc: Jack Link Frank Agostino ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST [APR • 3 19851 • c V* TUKw►LA PLANNING !)Epp'. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Tukwila West Office Building 2. Name of applicant: LPN Architects & Planners P.S., Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Royce Berg Contro o. Epic File No. :4770-2'.5— Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 7/ 114 Vine Street, Seattle, WA 98121. 4. Date checklist prepared: March 25, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Submit Bldg. Permit - April 1985 Construction - May - NovPmher 1985 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Grading Permit Buiding Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on ,,this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Small, 1 story office designed and developed for support use in estahlished business area. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township; and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Northwest corner of Andover Park West and Midland Drive on a 1.034 acre site Legal: Lot 11 of Plat, Uplands Tukwila Industrial Park as recorded in Vol_ 104, Plats 8, 9 & 10 records of King County. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• 410. Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat and clear, except scrub grass b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? .5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. medium to dense silt, sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill from adjacent site to be removed from this site. Any residual to be left for landscaping berms. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No 9. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 84% Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures .,to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Siltation control for on -site grading.. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? -'If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Possible dust emissions during grading plus minor construction equipment exhaust. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water site to keep dust down. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state .what stream or river it flows into. No 4 410 Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or, adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Believe site is out of 100 year flood plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None • Evaluation for • Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. None 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Collect and drain storm water into street. Storm water per City of Tukwila standards and existing facilities. • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface' waters? If so, generally. describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Siltation control during construction per City of Tukwila standards. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found . on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass - site to be cleared and grubbed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Addition of sod berms and landscape to enhance site and building. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: no trees - none mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: none . fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: - none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Normal electrical and gas loads for office heating and cooling and domestic water for toilet rooms. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building to meet Washington State Energy Standards. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If 'so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for • Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Normal auto/ truck traffic on City streets and rail spur adjacent property. 2) What. types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis "(for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term - construction noise but noting abnormal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current site is vacant with adjacent office and industrial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? .If so, what ?. No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C.M. - Industrial Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 60 Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- 'patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Maintain similar construction :.: but in reduced scale to adjacent buildings. Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any . proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 ft. max. Textured, painted concrete panels with dark tinted glass and landscaped yards. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Night lighting at building soffits and pole type parking lot lighting with controlled glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to - reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: See Note lla 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. 'Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Project not large enough to provide recreational facilities for office use. Evaluation for • Agency Use Only III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NJA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access to Andover Parkway West and Midland. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance,to the nearest transit stop? Approx. 3/4 mile towards shopping center. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 50± new stalls eliminate: none • Evaluation for d. Will the proposal,.require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak Volumes - 7:30 -8:30 a.m. 12:00 -1:30 p.m. 5:00 P.M. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire protection and police protection would be required but are already provided for adjacent development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Agency Use Only F 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities e ec ric ele'hone • Evaluation for Agency Use Only currently available at the site: e use servfnp septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as above with temporary power for construction. C. Signature - The above answers are tr.e and complete to the best of my knowledge. I unde and lead agency is relying on them to mak s d Signature: Date Submitted: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• Evaluation for • Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N /A- Proposed measures to prot0 such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Small increase in services in an area that is already zoned and planned for. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: See Above. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN • .. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Design and develop a low rise support office facility in an established and developed area. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Use a higher building with increased site coverage. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Preferred course of action is as proposed. Evaluation for Agency Use Only MIDLAND DRIVE ANDOVER P 'SITE DATA SIT! ARIA 40211 at BUILOINO AIM 12.211 a/. COVSRAO! 20.24• BARKING SO 1IS COMIAC1 • PARKING RATIO 1 /244 al. . 41=7a: rP reiIYUI.t LaATem.r. - PLAILL/A0Ou 1104UKE VBRONCAR10.J •NYUDNTS ADM •e YLIOHT •DOve •ECON AAA Y an1n11.101M VOW &ULU,c • 1'r II DYED *CO .--arcess M' l„I / • ii • wive e p SOUTH ELEVATION 'PO PAP - 4' PK/ std My RR ' ENTRY ELEVATION IM MECH. EQUIPMENT.' L- - -- "SKYLIGHTS RAILROAD EASEMENTfi —'�j SITE AREA '- 40,251.s.f.. :. BUILDING AREA 12,245 s.f. COVERAGE 30:34 % PARKING 50 (15 COMPACT) PARKING RATIO ` 1/244 s.f:` Lesson Pomeroy Northwest Inc. Royce A. Berg, A.LA. Principal 1844 -A Westlake Avenue North Seattle, Wash. 98109 284 -5771 NO DESCRIPTION • 3c -vewY 8I2 PJRPP5E7 ONLY • DATE II -e -£i t Z2C.7� ( ,IFY ) MIDLAND DRIVE SITE PLAN 1/16° :1' -0° SITE. PLAN PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .t-1N2t- . i`C L E IlY1ti r�I.Y� AFrt� CJIhi1EtJ`�IOtJ F�f ulf<E / IFI(�TIpLJ- JOB NO; b`4655 DATE +lo t5got DRAWN CHECK. SHEET NO OF ,1/4. I FLOOR PLAN Architecture and Planning Lesson Pomeroy Northwest Inc. I o ce A. Berg, A.I.A. Principal 1844 -A Westlake Avenue North Seattle, Wash 98109 284-5771 NO DESCRIPTION - -- .DATE 'tt-a -mow FLOOR . FLAN ELEVATIONS ' 3_a 6 .PROGRESS PRINT FF NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRY ELEVATION '. APR 8' 1985 LPN Architects & Planners • . JOB NO:644055 DATE Io.7.5 •8Q -DRAWN CHECK • 1'f :11. 17 �. •L' :'i7 hS1 I- A1- iDra�PE 5p.o' a 1. d ..LS>tilv�s.r� MIDLAND DRIVE IMP 1 TABULATION SITE 45,060.0 S.F. BUILDING 12,207.5 S.F. COVERAGE '.. 27:09% PARKING REGULAR ' 30 COMPACT 18 > HANDICAP 2 TOTAL 50 1/244 s.f. `. a .ACT. : ACOUSTICAL- -TILE' ' t INS." INSULATE (INS111. ATION) A.F.F. HOVE LJNISl80. Ft 00R 1 INT. INTI.RIOR AL .' PI Uliti 1 JT. JOINT ,15P11. • ASPHALT- - .,A:410. . AIUDI/. 6 : ; EAV. IAVAIORY ' 018 "MA:1111ACIURER ={ 11411. . 1101FRIAL ' tit.011.- MECPAIIICAL ■ F.F. FILIAL NIX. NIx10R1 N'T.S. tali' 10 S1A11- NO. - 51.115:9 011. 010ICE 0 C. •011 1111118 I OPNG.- OP1 Ni 110 f P1111. - PANEL . l PIN.,, t.ir)TION 0100. . 81111811G ft ' CIII.INb. E - !1111: 811110 •. 1.01.. ' 1111 10-18 011110." . CO41R11E 101141. CON 0111pen0N 1511 T. (01111:0005 0/0 n4ICh:ING 1011TIFAIN 11fi.. • '111.1411,1 nI A. -. 11 :.111111 - 11114., . OUR Pig 08 • . 0.9. 11014INPOUT . D0. DRAIN ONG:.. -"DRAWING • •11.00 ;' 011[1810- -- - ELEV. "01194110N'• . -- - , ENG. ENGINEER ' • EQ. EQUAL, EQUIP. EQUIPMENT - .EX15T .'EXISTING - 'EXP. - EXPANSION EXT.: . : :- EXTERIOR' - .•FT.. `FEET • 'FIN. FIT1151.1'. .FL: • .FLASHING FLR. • • FLOOR • - . ITG.. FOOTING . FON.:. FOUNDATION. - : F.O.F.' FACE.OF3FRANING" GALV.' GALVAOIZE - • "'GL., : :GLASS 1 • -" ..0.1.8.- • GLU- LF{1IIIATFD BEAN GYP'. BD. •GYPSU11;80ARD * MGT.,. HEIGHT • . i -PL. (.AM.. PLASTIC 101(00ATE P1980..'.- .PLYWOOD " REC. RECEPTION RECP: ' ' RECEPTACLE ' REINF. '- REINFORCING SDG. " SIDING -- 'SPE SPEC. C . -590.. STE70ARD IFICATION 1 STL: -STEEL - 5TR. - .STRUCTURAL:. • " TEMP.- - - TEMPERED - - 1' -TYP. . TYPICAL." U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED V.A.T. VINYL ASBESTOS TILE VENT..,. VENTILATE N.C. - HATER CLOSET N.N: WATER: HEATER .- SITE PLAN • 17:20'2 ABBREVIATIONS j - Lot. .11 .of the plat of Upland's Tukwila Industrial Park as recorded- iri Volume 104 of Plats.' pages B, 9 and .10. records.of King' County' 0eshingion. , Situated in the City of Tukwila,.. Con -:7 Washington.... .. • . LEGAL DESCRIPTION F � sTrE e ®, in . e ® . . �. „K AL w • secTi&- O..PETAL'- . P6Ici.. LllilrlCE'IL'jIOT i . 0 PEj4JL Is PpAWIl . . "E'AKTLN.:0 BULL SEG'1700J 2 3 - ' 12 TAIL SECTIOI.I OI' TAECTET "1t T IO0)PIAIISHEP `WALL ELEV &TIOLLS. . f')ECA'1T,Lo0C 41 .E 1 0APL E.LEN/ATIOLI • vooiZ TYPE C{ZP LIUEI - LOL'JM1 J L /OC FALL OF WALL P�ECJ\:I I TILT -UF - C GRi'tE 14T<=1CIOIC,: 4iUYl d pr.ywALL - " IU01ILATE0 STUD PKYWA1LL. 11 TW0 -101J4. KATEP pIICEWALL. . VICINITY MAP 5 SYMBOLS Arcndecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc. Royce A: Berg. A.I.A.. President - (14 Vine Street (Second & Vine) Seattle. wash. 98121 (206) 624 -5771 NO .DESCRIPTION , DATE PROGRESS PRINT • NOT FOR . C &CY'STRIICTION PRINTED NI1Wff PR: 81985 tests & Planners D 81985 TUKWRA D DEPT, JOB NO B 011) SHEET NO OF DATE DRAWN 706 CHECK: