The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-272-85 - SOUTHCENTER DAYCARE - DAYCARE FACILITY AND WAREHOUSESOUTHCENTER DAYCARE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BUILDING REMODEL 345 ANDOVER PARK EAST. EPIC 272 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Remodel Existing building at 345 Andover Park East to permit a day care facility and warehousing Proponent Southcenter Day Care Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 345 Andover Park E. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 272 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Er There is no comment period for this DNS [l This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date S- 22 - 8 s Signature f -t& You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM T0: (- BLDG PROJECT PLNG LOCATION P.W. •CN ?5-01-0 EPIC .272 -85" FILE FIRE (i POLICE n P & R .%/L . of U/ / _' iL ,3t5 DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR 092tvAuk FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD. BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT l,* 4,1-4/1/ A #/zetto k ,a6ve?.)----- A44 .4;,4 _ glb 1 /16J 4,,, Oi ,e___ I , ,, /1zG,4 (0,(kM.Alael 4A., a ,MA/Aid V, 4� A6- 7'/2't fi , al 0 A , de0,/iiini /47,.6 .c._ ✓. .� / /l ' a \sc. 7,7, /Ai��Lf' Al r ✓ 4d��f%'� u, _ Pi/kb Br w ' ' d .!/ / / C) .T.4 SGCs€'e k A,kigl. . i,eit s -94k- 5 i, ,a_hyku , I(°i / c , yeio) &lag, hi Aihd _kg, DATE /0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY ikilt C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN 575-OW EPIC ,27285 FILE FJ,S -Z-04o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: (1 BLDG El PLNG P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT 4..,./_ "_'_I �� 0�_� 1 J C�1 1'Li » l_� C'6C ___ ru- ,3('/s firdni.eA) 7q2. c_a FILE NO. 35'�0-C' DATE TRANSMITTED 'y':39-g5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5-7-35" LOCATION STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD. BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 J CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM BLDG ri PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R TO: PROJECT LOCATION • CN EPIC FILE .7 72-85 F5 -2 -6 so . of I1/ /. - . i/ �W5 it C2 eiV y.00 ) I ait DATE TRANSMITTED 41-30-Y5 STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE. IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD. BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ICJ -( le; .� DATE 5/7/75 COMMENTS PREPARED BY %r.4rL Ae„,) C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • taw ��.vi.Ge� • CN 75 -20 EPIC 277-85. FILE F5- .20-6u40 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG PLNG n P.W. n FIRE POLICE n P & R n PROJECT ∎ Z' 1001-00A1- LOCATION 3W5 fQjiO?/ -e%U " Q-tiC) O ± FILE NO. M2D-C DATE TRANSMITTED V -3915- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY --7-,j5"" STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE -0 REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD. BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 11 EXTERIOR LIGHTING...IF THE INTENDED USE OF THE BUILDING IS FOR DAYLIGHT HOURS ONLY EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHTING MAY BE SUFFICIENT. SHOULD'THE HOURS OF OPERATION SPILL OVER INTO THF. FARTY T.iQRNINn OR EVENINC DUSK IDER1-813C eR FULL HARK THEN SOME CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN THE UPGRADING OF EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF SAFETY - TO C'HTT.TIRRN FNTPPTVC OR LEAVINE FACILITY. 14C I ATTEMPTED TO LOCATED 90 PjoRKTNn RTAT T C Ann raTTLD 441Y B- IST1NC ISH X. 20. IF IT IS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT TO CREATE ADDITIONAL PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUILDING WHERE LOADING DOCKS NnW PYT4T TT-TTC /LAY REQUIRE PER1WTENTLY CLOSING SOME LOADING DOORS. BUILDING OFFICIAL SHOULD INSURE ADEQUATE PARKING FOR THE OFF LOADING & PICK UP OF YOUNGSTERS DURING, PRAV PPRTQDS_ 15B THE FACILITY, LOCATED ON TRECK DRIVE AND ANDOVER EAST Ts .cm THF' LTPRTPRN Tyr: OF AN INTERSECTION FORMED BY TRECK DRIVE, ANDOVER EAST AND INDUSTRY DRIVE. TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA IS ABOVE AVERAGE IN DENSITY AND THE ADDITION nF 120 TRIPS DURING THE AM AND PM PEAK PERIODS WILL HAVE SOME POTENTIAL TO IMPACT THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RATE. APPLICANT SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER FOR ADDITIONAL St.uux1TY LNrORMAT10N WHILE THE BUILDING IS STILL IN THE PLANNING STAGES. 5/7/85 DATE 40f/li/Ar COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM T0: BLDG PROJECT r--1 PLNG �N AS"-OL1D EPIC 7.2-85" FILE F.5"--07-6-6t40 P.W. IRE E POLICE (l P & R LOCATION Sys j 0?0-1/) Y12,, GQ DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR V-30-Y5 FILE NO. F5 -c20 -0 L.j RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. .COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT er • DATE - I rr COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC .22215' FILE F5-07-6-61.46/ TO: (i BLDG l l PLNG n P.W. Ei FIRE 1 ( POLICE 0 P & R PROJECT 00l,l)/44LP_Q.,n -e. ) �G C' J �� 6 c LOCATION 3W5 fij oii-ex 13,a0± FILE NO. 35 - O-C1(,[9 DATE TRANSMITTED 4--/-30-85- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY -7-05" STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. OF REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD. BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 A i` /. Nvia) filiCci-V°L--- 1 LIM CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System ,c_Z7z_g5-13 ;TER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM -ig-) • CRY OF TUIMMjI APR 2 G 1585 _ASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE :EPTED FOR PROCESSING. ECTION 1: GENERAL DATA YPE OF. APPLICATION: D BSIP DSHORT P CONDITIONAL USE • BAR 0 SUBD I V 15I ON Dr' PERM IIT E D PRD DPMUD' D I NTERURBAN DUNCLASS. USE 0 VARIANCE QCHG. OF COM PLAN ZONING DP. AMENDMENT APPL I CANT : NAME SOl3T NCC, h►'�� 1.3P14 C e P t E TELEPHONE ( - 2 - 0 I , ) G-7 S- v -g 8. ADDRESS 12-33 A 14 bOVER 'PARK E-•, TO KW ■ l_A ZIP ciS I T% !) PROP : OWNER :. NAME S K P/R80, R O h1 Z 1•G-E TELEPHONE (.06) 575 -330 ADDRESS 16 ?0 SouTrtcet 2 "P e.-U-1A , -T-UwlLAz1P 481 ET g ) PROJECT LOCAT 1 ON : ( STREET ADDRESS , GEOGRAPH 1 C , LOT/ BLOCK) , 4 S r'1 t' o J E1' -PARK_ E . SECTION 11: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE ' PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. REMODEL-. 11*. .1 LATER Io.R 314 S P) 1JDUiC�ii . PAR K 'E.. DUI CD 036-, SV ITA"$LF FOR •ZSVEI l U 6- n- At4 ceire . c 5) . ANT 1 C I'PATED PER I OD OF CONSTRUCT I : • FROM M Ay ) 4 $S TO SV N€ IQ$S W 1 LL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED . I N PHASES? OYES 'U NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: 6) 7) PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: 8 ) NET GROSS TOTAL f{ FLOORS TOTAL GROSS 14. 000 + FLOOR AREA SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COOP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD SIZE - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL ILALIID9 ❑ YES ❑ NO EASEMENTS INCLUDES: BASEMENT n MEZZAN 1 NE INCLUDES: D BASEMENT 0 MEZZAN 1 NE EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES ❑ ❑ 0 90. 'O ❑ 0 -7O APPRO*. ao Lseb FOR PLfl4GizOUN O R-RcA CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE CITY OF TUMNILA Central Permit System -MASTER LAND' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM- • PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: COM MERC(t°sl. ' OFFIC6 /w P EttoUSE 2) PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST IN TMC 18.64.020): • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED.USE (FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING-PROCESSES USED, WHOLESALE/RETAIL/WAREHOUSE FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE-STORAGE.OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP ON THIS S 1 it) : DAY CARE CE LATER "›RESctiOo L 'FoR CHI l.'DRE,1.) • 4 wsevz To $ YEARS 'OF • AGE. - =IJGLV01i.16- ov rtooR "PI- A4 &RoUN� ARF•A_ • THIS i5 • A LQCIa - O3 co F THE DPI WHIcH c uRviENT 1_• OPERATES S BLOCKS -' SO .rr-H of .mE. 'PROQOS • h16 tom.( S l TE . DESCRIBE THE MANNER; IN WHICH YOU. BELIEVE. THAT.. YOUR REQUEST FORA CONDI7.IO AL_USE PERMIT_'_ WILL SATISFY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED. IN TMC 18.64.030 ..:::.AL SHEETS tF NECESSARY) . . (ATTACH .ADD ITION- 1) THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO. THE PROPERTY OR 1 S INTHE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED USE OR IN THE DISTRICT 3 IN WHICH. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. • RESPONSE:. THE Pizt4POSEb • ONLY RELOCA"rE..s Ail EXt ST- lV•3€ .-DAB,. • C ASE CENTSRI Wt-•tc H NOW QPE.RArES 1 tJ 1--H-E 513t11/4-4 Zo►JE • THE PROPOSED USE SHALL-MEET OR EXCEED THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE D ISTRICT , I.T WILL OCCUPY. RESPONSE : Die PERFORM AN C.e STA►JDA'tZDS 'W t t--L- EXcE Ell THOS E REQUARPA 11.1 ?]-k DtST`RtcT 1:i2O1 oS'Eb WILL o cr+ UPy. rt.! FACT IS L \ C }-1 T • M A IJ OF Pt c:r % G '' p1ST Rt cis; P »y C RRe CE eJTE R W I LL 1:3E LESS t iJ TQ Ll S THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE GENERALLY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. RESPONSE : THE 13L� 1 LD 11J 1 S 1 (J S T I IJ G 'RU cTt12E S 1 M 1 L 1Pi-R TO THOSE A'RQU 7'T__ The Lot Lt_ NOT E-KCEE'� vJ H AT IS NS oRt-4 fl t_ FOP, Tr-YE PE A 1A11-t E t r l 5 L O CATS ib_ 4) THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. RESPONSE : THE. E. DAY CP, RE Cc-i,1 oY t- SFszv 1 cF S FOR W QR E RS A03t STPRc F ► ■.5 S Q 2tZo UtJ QI NI G PA G t L IT) ES . Ti-t E N EET Fob THESE SERUtCES 1S 1iJ (-4 14 1JEMfl1l. • pp voa�..,try. ALL MEASURES HAVE'+BEENVTA TCW M I N I M I ZE THE POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS WH 1 CH THE PRO- POSED USE MAY HAVE ON THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED. • RESPONSE.;' THE ' C DAy CPze_E ceo-reQ.. NAS )JOT GEV.)E,R.& b Ariy piDve v 4i4:it:rS. Tt-tE REC.ocPrT1 aF -rh IS DAY C��E C E TO Tl-tE r- c os 51 , J UST S $ LOQ N O►'?TH � S Hoy t.'D A LSO , NOT 6- 'Et.1 c i z i t , T A ►.3• AbV 6RS E . M ?Ac-rs • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • Control No. 0 4 51/g Epic File No. /07�,X) Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 7 A. BACKGROUND (345 RNDOVe2 PifyikA4 E ) 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: SCA,111CIFIJ71R. ' j7ft� c rF}gE F SC "Woi 2. Name of applicant: kelA_i A-. GV.ODS'E, q11/P1 SoJnItCEL 1JA-(/ C4012E 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1233 A NDO vt. PP- �., —ry K.uJ i LP, 5-7 5 - I — FS (I i.11EL.L,i E G1 ost) 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): MIA'j -SU►JE 1985 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. .1,In 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Nio(A — ,- IoivEve, f, ONit) t Oki USA 'FERMI T FOR 1-1 -kE. Ey.1 S T IJG >141 GA12! GEn11121 ! W AS Pi P P.ov e c 1 N AP P 1 L 19 $y. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property 'covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 1b. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. DSNS - CHILbCP►RE LI cE.nJSE 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. REMODEL Ia, - EXISTIOG- "$U IN TO A Ay GA6Z THE ST`RUCRJRE POR'71ON 'F3U► Is -PU12PDSE 1 1 N S I DF L I t.I <T Akio A' L A 'jr-r o. J h OUTS Im' - PAP- WRIW . 3nOr, Sf. o1'EQJ o" s �{ 000- s PiRFA 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 3t-1S At4r oJER ,-r-t1K JIc-A, Vt1ASN. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally•sensitive? DO 4 OT v<N 0uu • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other F L What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? no wry KNOLL) (FLA) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. DO( 4 O T 1-ONJ O AJ -" (PAVE. &€ t4 ) 2 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 1,1/T\ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. tin g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N O 4 E 4. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N fF 2. Air a.. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. WOWE b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. WO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N f ( 3. Water. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N /R 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/ h 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 11(7 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. DO NOS' KO0tw 6). Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO • Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will •ground • .discharged description tities, if water be withdrawn, or will water be to ground water? Give general , purpose, and approximate quan- known. Nn 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. DOMESTIC. S GUJ AG'E 'F_g_R APP+ O 4ATEf —Lon NuId$L•15 (CHI L.1yREtil D_sii_TS) • We uJ%LA— "B 0251.116 AN En0 STitJe5 S PAL. i'E¢ATI o nls c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. DO NOT +e.n10v.J • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N0 d. Proposed. measures 'to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NI/p, Plants a. ,Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs )( grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NNE, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if ,any: W19 wE, WiLL -- KtcP AND t t5En1 T LA nibs ct\p 6 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: N fT mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: TA IA b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 0 (i c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 'DO 1,10—r KNOW d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N / 9 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N A-Tv 24 c— GAS 'pry) EL T A F tic 1 sS L� CS b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally. describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: t lf) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NI/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?_JJ t. E. — NoRMPtL "iRArF�L NOISES 'E4ttST,13UT 1.1(YT A F F E CT -p ose c_T 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.E TRAFF- k W l LL. N4T E X c-e Eb W t-1-AT IS NoRMwrL. FOR_ Trkf V PtP i 3) .Proposed measures � reduce or control noise impacts, if any: q 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? WA .Re /OFF1 �E AND _Mp�NVFACII�R►NCr "um (S r tim R�TAC�NT PRO'PE,RII �S b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Nip c. Describe any structures on the site. EtciSTi? G STRUCT\ E, USFA> — OFFiC WA(2E14(1 -6E W 1` to t 1 Ll Q11011 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No_ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LIGHT' MANUFRc-rUe-tt /C)NtMC2C1Arl__ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Do t ten NOu If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? to t4crr ictJO J h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Do NOS KIJOLx-) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? t 00 Too��L_ PS'R� INCLuDt►JG Ct+1LaREfJ VA? \ -oyEE5 Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NOtJE j• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1.11p, 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: OPERATE Co,Js STAN-Th./ W(YH. 7-Re EXI STI NG `t CP2E- CE1J 2 r'&TrE2f I.E . - PtAy6ROU OD 11 m. -DU RI Orr MORM $REHKTiMa✓S LUNCHTIMFG. TAE e IST_Sr' D A �( CAR-E C e1.17E P.. 1 S I N {-t i T IDE M A f "By SUR-,k_ot)I.IAIIUE- WORKPLACES T'-tR S1‘4 P LO / e es. N A S NoT t NTEP -CE O wtzt -+ RNy EXtSTt►JG LAWD USES T DPsTi`.. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing ?. 1.1(F) b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. rJ fV c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ►sJ / F 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 4.11f) — -Y i ST, N & R IJ CflJ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? n1 /7 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N IF) Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce ?: What time of day would it mainly occur? NJa b.. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? On c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N 1rpt d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 1.1 / 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? N o1J E b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nip, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 0 1A b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. 0/A I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N IN 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. _ 1= X I S T I P16 E S h81.1 cAnizt.ietz. 01= PI t.1DDV ER -P. AP-V.. E.. Ft .-t p. DR∎V'E b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? / Ej c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? —70. 1T NOW HAS fl1'PROX. 90 a,o BE USEP FOR PL Av.GROdt \ PrR • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 1,10 f. -How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak .volumes would occur. RTILEs; • sppi..tt, Pt S •FOR --I c\f >r X I sr N I) Al CA RE (e+UTee_ ocPtT 0 $ "'Rv..DG{CS EST► MATED I •0 R C T ' FPsK- " T _ L I . 4 S = 7 : ' 5 0 - 8 , 3M AND t.S PM g. i Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 51-‘001_,s, 1�SOT_ 1MPIPr�T -- NO�FZMP�`_ .'T'RP.c? ‘ G ?op_ przE.. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. WA • • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at th ite: natural gas w ter refuse service, e ep one, . i ary sewer septic system, other. Ho. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. SAMC Pt S ��Gi STI tit (T C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for: Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANIII D; SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS. (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxig or hazardous substances; or production of noise? •l /i Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? J j Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: t..1 /(.\ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N f R Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N fA 4.. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N /F) Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N �A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N if) • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N 'A- How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? bp NUT' KNOuJ 6.. Hot; would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N 0 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IJ (1a 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 81 Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? NO Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N • • • TO BE ,COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the'objective(s) of the proposal? TO ?ER Dt L_ (rN E-yC.1STi OFTkcf- "igUlLtlitQtc. SU lTA$tc P r R o' )Saz Pi-n Al G r- ••U R CJ-E «►.1?�c2 T'D "RElocATE. l+ L xIST IN& -t'f ( C APE C-ENTE.Z LOCRiW l N SFtt --tE 7_01 SE T Thi'G- 71F, j S 11 F S �3 Lo C.(�.S ja-uuA 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? N D N E 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: OB'TAtkl A-J 1/4./ X042 ReM obEc,i—► I.1 — C1-t-E (\l ‘./Q "-1'z-1=1z S &I3 St T�