The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-274-85 - SMITH GRAYDON - SOUTH 152ND STREET VACATIONVACATION OF S.152ND ST. EAST OF 57T" AVE. S. ADJACENT TO HAMPTON HEIGHTS APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT EPIC 274 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal vacation of S. 152nd St. east of 57th Ave. S. Proponent Graydon Smith Location of Proposal, including street address, if any east of 57th Ave. S. adjacent to the Hampton Heights apartment development Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 274 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.03O(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. J There is no comment period for this DNS. This determination is based upon compliance with existing City ordinances and regulations. �( This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date August 30, 1985 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS TO: FROM: DATE: August 27, 1985 SUBJECT: S. 152nd St. Vacation City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM The proposal is for vacation of approximately 734 feet of street which currently serves the Hampton Heights apartment complex and two undeveloped lots, one zoned single family (R -1 -20) and the other zoned multiple family (R -4). Hampton Heights abuts the initial approximate 400 feet of the street which is improved with pavement. The total property conisists of four lots created by short subdivision 83 -17 -SS on December 15, 1983. If vacated the street would become a private street to the extent desired in future development of the two easterly undeveloped lots. TMC 17.24.030 (Subdivision Ordinance - minimum standard for private street) specifies a private street can be no longer thatn 200 feet and accommodate full future development on the lots. Clearly the proposal exceeds this standard by at least 200 feet, but may provide adequate access for future development. The latter has not been demonstrated or analyzed by the applicant and /or Public Works. On this basis alone the proposal cannot be approved. However, vacation of the easterly portion (adjacent to the two undeveloped lots) would conform to the subdivision ordinance. Originally the alignment of the street was straight, but the existing curv- alinear alignment was created in 1975. The latter was followed in the recent short plat of the property. Therefore, vacation of the easterly approximately 334 feet of the street will result in the R -1 -20 and R -4 zoning classifications aligning with the center of the street, the same as now exists. Lot 2 (R -1 -20) is approximately 1.93 acres in size and will accomod t about fd(g three single family homes. Lot 4 (R -4) will theoretically support multi le 401 family residential units on the 1.91 acre parcel. Slightly more units may be possible after factoring the addition to the lots of area within the vacated street. A cul -de -sac is required of 80 feet in diameter at the end of the street (TMC 17.24.040.1) provided the street is no longer than 600 feet. 1 F 3 93 / •'•40 as 1PP 03 61- d 0 �o r 273 ;ti 4� G ✓C 9 ) 0 . 2 7.31' J M G 1 ik 85.50 7 • • ,eo sa t•00353 4� ,� c • F + ry, 58 %. M. 35 N. :72 72 Ai 1. tit 403 3s •rdS -S2- /dw • 0 i�•r�l or • 2Zr. RAJ a SC) 04 1130 24 3.3J vS9.32 -/3 w .55 4'8.95- -/9W 0i h PF • dd Lot "8" 1-2 - o A/89.52-/J w Lot es "C �a . 5 y 0189 .Lot\ 4 1 -? B'" F J p 13'0001 �I �'� 40'J 0 89 -621/3 w' /75 • .✓89-52 -/3 W Lot /65 40_ 16�6oBOJLot C . B /o I 40 N h h a 0 v t 0 • .1 zo R� oy�.eF'' 9 1. 2 019 268 25 202 330.40 TU SP 83 -17 -55 8312210348 • • :y .V 67 -roe. S. ,52ND ST. 46 J I /7/ N NOTE • TH:6 A14 P A.VO /J d AJEO Ow/ ■V Y. M/PJ� PLATO CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG n PLNG PROJECT LOCATION. OAF 57 DATE TRANSMITTED 8 14' RESPONSE REQUESTED STAFF COORDINATOR , RESPONSE RECEIVED • CN 85'• 2r) EPIC 27 { •115 _ FILE P.W. FIRE E j POLICE P & R 'LAO FILE NO THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 49 1A/ 64-r 1 -- 4i ,' 67---s en V Pr7 1 t)'J o= 02 7 W E W A- 7 &' w t1- F_" Ena 4 IA, cc_ 13 N b Lb ( /. 2- I"'-0 S% 71—) getifloore 4_,0 Aki D l %1-e_ ,A-- E [, 711 i2T4119-11 5 e IA) rei --41 ; DATE n: 2 17 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CND 73) EPIC' 431511. FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTINGFORM TO: n BLDG Fri PLNG PROJECT LOCATION e, • of- 5 DATE TRANSMITTED 8 is 14 —85 STAFF COORDINATOR gag. ea (l FIRE (l POLICE P&R oaf FILE NO RESPONSE REQUESTED RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COM /0, 4411 j / DATE ro- !/ :10.0,51,0W7 i so3/ AUS , COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses • and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your Proposal.' You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires ,a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Vacation aL S.152nd _&s it'traverses subject property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would'occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. That portion of S. 152nd lying east of 57th Ave S. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent�� a" properties? Vacant site - apartments adjacent. (AA, a, L.91,�' b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None- 16. Utilities a. Circl- lities currently ay.. lable . te: naturalp, 4 efuse servic anitary sewer septic sys em, o her. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best my knowledge. I and and that the lead agency is relying on them to ma is decision of Signature: Date.Submitted: 7/31/85 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Nnna How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? not applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not applicable until adjacent properties are developed. Proposed measures to reduce or respond such demand(s) are: Nn„ 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. will not conflict. Evaluation for Agency Use Only ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Contr•No. 465 -2-37 Epic File No. 274 ' . S Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ? ?a Z ' 1. Name of proposed project, •if applicable: Subdivision of tracts 37 & 38. Blookvalle Garden Tracts. 2. -Name of applicant: Graydon Smith 3. Address -and phone number of applicant and contact person: 13861 18th Ave. SW, Seattle, WA 98166 #872 -8796 4. Date checklist prepared: 7/31/85 5. Agency- requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): As soon as approved by Tukwila City Council. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Development of lots 2 & 4 of this subdivision. . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property . covered by your proposal? If 'yes, explain. No -2- ICI��`y`1i?I�l [.UG 14185 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses • and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not, need t� repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Vacation,S;152nd as it traverses subject property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. That portion of S. 152nd lying east of 57th Ave. S. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land ' Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No -3- ' 'TO'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAS • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Hilly b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. .Glacial till and large rock d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 1O% • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None needed 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air; if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface -water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected.- Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general .description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the . general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Over and through systems approved by the City of Tukwila. . • Evaluation for 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None needed for this action. ti 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the si deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other p/<vergreen tree: fir; cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other wester plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,.other ✓other types of vegetation What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nnna Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency -Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, • explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not appl_icabje in this action • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, • describe. None 1)• Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant site - apartments adjacent. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Apartment, medium density (2--14 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Apartment, medium density g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site ?Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None (road vacation) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with existing laws. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable b. What views in the immediate vicinity would altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Applicable only when adjacent property is developed. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Tukwila Park, 65th :Ave. S. Hazelnut Park, 59th Ave S and 147th St Tukwila Elementary School_ 58th S. and S 149th St b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation, a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. S. 152nd - See site plan submitted to City of Tukwila. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets; not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. • 16. Utilities • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle u..tilities currently av lable ele tLi it i, natural telep one, sanitary sewer. septic sys em, o her. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable until adjacent property is developed. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I and and that the lead agency is relying on them to ma is decision Signature: Date.Submitted: 7/31/85 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable until adjacent properties are developed. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NotE applicable until adjacent properties are developed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No‘ effect - Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Nona • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not likely Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Not likely Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans ?. Not applir.ib1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: NnnP How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? not applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not applicable until adjacent properties are developed. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: NnnP 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.will not conflict. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila - Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Unknown Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- 40 BE COMPLETED' BY APPLI T • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The- objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The owners of this property dedicated this strip of land to City of Tuk- wila at no cost to the city back when the city planned to have S. 152nd connect as a through street to the east. This is no longer a possibility therefore it makes sense to vacate this strip and allow this development to control its own access and security needs. The advantages to the city besides maintenance and upkeep of additional roadway is evidenced in the liability factor. It'is imperative if the city approves this vacation that the new property line between the North and South lots shall be the center line of the _existing right of way. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The alternatives are two fold 1) Deny vaca- tion completely. or .2) Approve the vacation of the Easterly portion only. However, my request is based on anc. agreement between Graydon Smith, S &M Investments and • The City of Tukwila, whereby the involved parties agreed to complete the L.I.D. 30 by reducing the length of the street to be improved, thereby reducing the cost of the project thus eliminating the major property owners objec- tion of the L.I.D. The City of Tukwila in turn agreed to the vacate 152nd as evidenced in the attached letters. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Self expanatory. see # land 2 above Evaluation for Agency Use Only O FFAE MEMO CITY o F T U KW I LA TO: 6P;1%ul FROM: DATE: 1 ici 83 SUBJECT: S,'52I3c Sri , ks-m0 sVore- (-0\N cs---,1/49-PA-.) Speed Message Date -1-. l`_IL .fit ` e as 3, -2swie0 19 •.(k_ u A Gam_ df- 61,‘ 111,4.0-770 wt Signed WilsonJones P�� ,AcceSS ``' #1-6° (s5 y GRAYLINE FORM 44 -900 2 -PART Q "^� �U /� 0) .1983• PRINTED IN U.S.A. "1 ^__� (�••�/ ./ I 6r70.‘-`4‘.‘ W . (1 483 HUM APR 10 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING. DEPT. PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREETS Pursuant to RCW 35.79.010 TO THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL: 7P0'1\gE APR 10 i ;;15 CITY OF TUKWILA CITY CLEP,KS OFFICE 1 The undersigned petitioners hereby request the vacation of the following described portion of right -of -way located in the City of Tukwila. See attached legal description of South 152nd that traverses Tracts 37 and 38, Brookvale Garden Tracts, as recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 47, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the unplatted strip ad- joining on the east. 2. The name and address of all owners of property abutting on said portion are as follows: NAME ADDRESS 575 -0225 Hampton Heights Associates 752'Broadway,Tacoma,WA 98402 (Se•a.phone) Graydon and Marlys Smith 13861 - 18th Ave.SW, Seattle,WA 98166 872 -8796 3. In accordance with Section 18.10.010, Ordinance x1006, the $150.00 fee for street vacation has been received. DATE RECEIPT NO. CLERK 4. The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two - thirds of the owners of real estate abutting on the above described property. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, NAME Hampton Heights Associates di 41erriAla/dalf 140 ay. on Smith 13861 - 18th Ave. SW, Seattle, WA 98166 ',17r. . Marlys`Sm N. ADDRESS 752 Broadway, Tacoma, WA 98402 13861 - 18th Ave. SW., Seattle, WA 98166 • �%Je /,"T /ate -c�T !'oe-a XL) e --5.;‘,//C y r �c.� - - �.��i 7iis f�,..,a� 7. /z /oo 74 7 .•*--//.; ar Sc /'p LY7 ArJ A portio volume 1 WITH the strip of n of Tracts 37 and 38, Rrookv 0 of plats, page 47, records o unplatted strip adjoining on land the centerline of which ale Garden Tracts, as recorded in f King County, Washington; TOGETHER the east consisting of a SO foot is described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of South 152nd Street with the centerline of'57th Avenue South, from which point the centerline of 57th Avenue South bears due north; thence north 87 °20'00" east, 445 feet to.a point of curvature; thence easterly along a 200 foot radius curve to the left an arc distance of 108.21 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence easterly along a 200 foot radius curve to the right an arc distance of 108.21 feet to a point of tangency; thence north 87 °20'00" east, 98.90 feet •to a point located south 87 °20'00" west a distance of 5 feet from the• west line of Interurban Addition to Seattle, as recorded in volume 10 of plats, page 55, records of King County, Washington, and the terminus of this description. TOGETHER WITH: .a turnaround area described as follows: Commencing at the terminus of the above centerline; thencenorth 0 °37'54" east 25.04 feet to the point of beginning; thence north 0 °37'54" east 15.02 feet; thence south- 87°20'00" west 65 feet; thence south 0 °37'54" west 15.02 feet; thence north j 87 °20'00 ".east 65_feet to the begin.ning....- 1 i Hampton Heights A sociat %le& Grayd'on Smith Marlys ith SHORT PLAT NO.— .8S-1i 55 — TUKWILA, WASHINGTON . Subdivision Coaaltt.a .n1 h____v certified for filing this IS.' _ Say of ?L_ ��- 1• Tiled for record at the request or, Oroydan Smith • Same S•trra toe Chairman. Sho • • _ division Coaaltt. 21 IC: 34 IM 'Al 85/12/21 •01.48 A RECD F 7.00 CQSHSL •••«•7.00 22 Planning Division • .. Office of Community Development 1230 touthe.nt.r Aoul.vard _ Tukwila, washington !1211 GAL DESCRIPTION AL TRACT 37 AND 38, 1ROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RED3UN D IN KLLIE 30, OF PLATS, AGE 47, IN KING COINTY• WASHINGTON. • LSO, THAT PORTION OF SECTION 23, TOIGHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.N•, IN KING =NTT, ASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS F0LL St • EGINNING AT THE SOJT1EAST CORNER OF TRACT 371 THENCE EAST TO THE WEST LINE OF INTERRRRAN •'•ITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE SS, IN KING WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE - ••TH LINE OF TRACT 381 THENCE WEST TO THE NQRTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 381 THENCE SOUTH LONG THE EAST LINE CT SAID TRACT 38 AND SAID TRACT 37 TO THE POINT OF DEGINNINGI OGETHE4,WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTH 132ND STREET WHICH, UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TD SAID EMUS BY OPERATION OF LAW, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THERECT DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUWILA UNDER ITOK'S FILE NO. 7312100346 DZPARTNENT OP ASSESSMENTS SZAMIIID AND APPROVZD TM 3 Day of ••.))&e_ . 1/e3 • / /t7Q.- •f7• *kg, •h-1, .30 b C 2119133./ JI. 1-47pe ASSCSSOR =PC:: essssk r EN • • • 1 -. - - :vc...c etcrr�a -snrr airw _- 8 — �..0 7`S . - -•;. - • 1 Z 0 t. - - -_- _ 100009- - - -- ' 1 - = 73 <:�u�T— - l jaarsewr.ome s..srwc+w..o SS �4W9/;la/£ W,Irkg MA•I•.•ii• tow.r.•Iwev AIM.•' _ - - - - - -- - -_.Of _r..AS:wat St. A.44• k 000.1.410 Corfeow,,./r ris sr 7s0/077p/yam - • ... _ LOT." . L;4z 1.4 -r Inge. Ascot- r Alas•MC AvC ews.✓r s,.vt46eG/V.•••■•0 ittecT. dYJTY.•7. LAO MT__a�..•— eb.visw.r•TG ,- orie /rr F/Jf�W✓7 393 383. 7,6 /V 69 :49:53"w . 7Z&.76 •1 • - L✓' W✓tt{tr Lenc. _ .5s • Snnetary Seiukr O• 1./D rr: iir nicicp /n lit mafic%/ 4.n) B./ /3ne / Svr•vc y ° p^- ° pp‘ C1'. /P. 7-44 G�/erSt1 3,4 •ly o�Tnocfi 'Ss�! 1f E/ntew Tj Z. /s.N7'.wY/h erialit -� O.r r_ /- .!' !rri• fir: ir✓I +* .e! �.w,. land S yor's Certificate: This short plat tip represents • survey^ made by see or and.: ay direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute end has bun properly stated in accordance with the Tukwila Subdivision Code. Date e r�•- Certificate No. Short Plat No 83-0— 5S DrC 211963 M•p on File in Vault Stomp Pape 2 of • -THE WEST 393 PEST OF TRACT 37, BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE - - -PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1: GP PLATS, PAGE 47 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TCC_TH -M WITH T:U�T r0: TIC: CT VACATED SOUTH 152ND STREET WHICH, UPON ''�"- - - VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TC THE CITY OF TUKWILA UNDER AUDITOR'S TILE W3.--.-- 7512100369. • SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7402040162, 7512150829 AND 7601070497. AND SUBJECT TO UNRECORDED EASEMENTS AS DEFINED _ IN DRAWING OF "BUILDINCS_&ND UTILITIES" DATED SEPTEMBER 23i1976,_(SEL EXHIBIT-1)7 LOT 2. TRACT 37 BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 393 FEET THEREOF; ALSO, TEAT PORTION OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RAP4E- 4-EAST1- N.44., -;A KING-COUNTY, VASHINGTGN,- DESCRIBED,AS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH!AS CORNER OF TRACT 37; THENCE EAST TO THE VEST - LINE OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID VEST LINE TO TEE *ASTMLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 'O TRACT 37; THENCE WEST TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 37; THENCE C SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 37 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: • T0CtTN R WITH THAT PORTIO'< OF VACATED SOUTH 152ND STREET WHICH, UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAL: PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 6 75/2100369. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 7402040162 AND 7512150829, AND SUBJECT TG UNRECORDED EASEMENTS AS DEFINED IN DRAWING OF "BUILDINGS AND UTILITIES" DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 1976 (SEE EXHIBIT A). LOT 3 THE VEST 403.55 FEET OF TRACT 38, BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUM' 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7512100369. SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AECJRD'ED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 6311175, AND SUBJECT TO UNRECORDED EASD+.EF S AS DEFINED IN DRAWING OF "BUILDINGS AND UTILITIES DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 1976 (SEE EXHIBIT A). short suss Io, 63 -17-5i • pore mot M2I1983 • • ••■••■1111p■ . • ' .4; ...r.t.1.-.7.' . VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, 'PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST ' TRACT 58, BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN • _ ••._ ....•.•.. '1 [ _ .• -- .. ... t.- .:a. -.......-- .ir.L-•-,-.. =-77.-.e-..:or__.......— ...,..__, .,....-..?.z -e-=. .1 • . : - -4- ..... -.._. _ ..._ __,_-_—... --.......-- _ _ _ _ .. _ _ .___ . _ • .... _ . • . _ _ . _ . • • _ _ _ _ . • _ . • -. • • _ - • __ _ ___. - • . • _ • • _ _ • _ ... • • LoT46_,.....-.....- — • ...- - ••• 741.07711,vi PORTION OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP .23 NORTH, RANGE 4-EAST, R.N., il ------=--4x .rnz =cm,. ilASAINCTON, DESCRIBED AS : 4 • ..: .: . • .. --- • •••• . •—:—.16PCIFININC AT THE(SOUTBEAST CORNER OF TRACT 38; TREECE EAST TO TEE VEST' • LINE OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PACE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID VEST LINE TO THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF - TRACT 38; THENCE WEST TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 38; THENCE - SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 38 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: . TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTH 152ND STREET WHICH, UPON . VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THAT CO PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. ‘r 7512100369. fro most 'eat moo 1.53 -11- SS D. re 1 19 8 3 • iCLA1Lll�TUN_ ` -- _ K,ow all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owners) in fee simple _end contract purchaser /a) tbe.laod herein described do hereby make -a short -'subdiv117'oo Lber-.of -pursuant-to !CW 38:777060-ana-scYnowledge-that ..-j '.said short subdivision shall not be tuRther divided In any manner within a ..' •i period of five years, from date -of - record•,- without -the- filing of-4 p1.t. The'undersigned further declare this sh =representation of said short subdivision and that same is made -with theefree -- -- -- i_= ad_Sn_ accordance with e the desir of the owner(s)ti. whereof we have set our bands sndsealsr -- - -- CITIZENS DERAI,.3AVI*GS f LOAN._. _ ._ ASS0�0 �6E 7. Ilj LFS RAKE moans W. Backer LRA • A$!!•i�FGi'9N ; County of King On this day personally appeared before ■e Graydon Smith and Marlys M. Smith be the lndividualsdescribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same ea their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. i!V1983. EN under ■y hand and official seal this A511 day of 0 rl 2 fq//:.01.10t1P1./ Votar y b c in and for the State of Washington, residing at llrkland STATE OF WASHINGTON - 55. County of King On this 1 hh day of October , A.D. 1983, before me, the unders gi ned, • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Thomas V. Backer and Eunice 1. Richards to be known to be the Assistant Vice President and Vice President respectively, of Citizens Federal Savings and Loan Association of Seattle , the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corp- oration, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they authorized to execute the said instrument and ,that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • • TRESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written �1fnLF- _ v • j'7 d Voter Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Kent Short Plat Number 83 -P-SS at 211983 Page S or S `ALA Li, CD Z N City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor October 24, 1983 GRAYDON SMITH Air Freight Containers, Inc. P.O. Box 58148 Tukwila Station Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Short Subdivision Application 83 -17 -SS Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is to formally notify you of the City Short Subdivision Committee action of October 20, 1983. The Committee approved the following configuration of your application: 1. The property line between Lots 1 and 2 to be located 5 feet from any existing parking lot and 8 feet from any existing buildings. 2. The property line between Lots 2 and 4 to be located along the southerly right -of -way line of S. 152nd St. 3. The property line between Lots 3 and 4 to be the extension of the westerly line of the right -of -way of 58th Ave. S. Per Section 17.08.060.3, Tukwila Municipal Code, if you feel aggrieved by this decision you may appeal to the Planning Commission. Should you . decide to file an appeal you must do so in writing and submit the appeal to the Planning Department by October 30, 1983. During considerat; on of your application the Committee understood the following: 1. Any vacation of S. 152nd St. will require revision of the property line between Lots 2 and 4 to the extension of the.southerly right -of- way line of the remaining portion of S. 152nd St.' 2. Zoning lines will follow property lines created by this application and any revisions thereto. 3. On -site verification of existing buildings and parking lots on Lot 1 will occur to confirm compliance with current setback requirements. age -2-. GRAYDON SMITH October 24, 1983 • For the City to complete its action on your application a revised map needs to be submitted complying with the aforementioned Committee action and showing verification of existing applicable improvements on Lot 1. I trust this accurately summarizes the Committee's action and understanding. Should you have any questions, please call me at 433 -1847. Respect ck Beeler Associate Planner RB /blk cc: Planning. Director Public Works Director Fire Marshal r A LE°_C'JL.D WOOLN1N I -Al TEN DONALD G FLEMING GEORGE. M HARTUNG MEADC EMORY LEON C ■ISTEREK OWAYNE E. COPPLE THOMAS 0. MCLAUGHLIN JOHN r. COLGROVE C. DEAN LITTLE LAWRENCE E.MARO RODNEY J. WALDBAUM •• LESOUND. PATTEN, FLEMING, HAR f UNG & EMORY ATTORNEYS AT LAW OC EFTTLC.-FIF:ET NATIONAL DANK GUILOING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154 (?061 624.1040 August 4, 1981 Mr. Enrique Mora S & M Investments .19800 Pacific Highway South Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Tukwila Estates Condominiums Dear Mr. Mora: BRUCE 0 HANSON RICHARD P MATTNEWS D. WILLIAM TOONE (DANIEL D. WOO CARL J CARLSON P WARREN MAROUAROSON LAWRENCE A. M. ZELENAK JULIE G. WADE MARIANNE SCHWARTZ OBARA C. A. TEKLINSKI DANIEL W. FERM WILLIAM S. WEINSTEIN ROBERT L. PALMER COUNSEL As City Attorney for the City of Tukwila, Washington, I have advised the City that it should issue a building permit for your proposed Tukwila Estates Condominiums based on- the- condition7that7theT developer_ will: notf commence- con=_ --2 struction until -- the- str-eet vacation - process - for - South- r52nd) Street -is- completed_? and you have satisfied all building permit requirements including but not limited to the follow- ing steps: 1. The_ :publ-icT right = of= way -on- -South 152nd- _Street. east_of- 57th Avenue _has= Tbeen_vaeated)subject to provisions being made for ingress and egress to all affected property owners. 2. Development plans for improvements to be constructed within the vacated right -of -way have been approved by appropriate City departments. 3. Developer has provided adequate documentation to various City departments that provisions have been made to provide all necessary utilities to service the develop- ment. Such documentation should include easements where appropriate, documentation of construction of utilities of plans for construction of utilities in a size and configuration adequate to service the project. Such construction to be completed prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 4. Developer provides documentation to the City to demonostrate the adequacy of a storm water retention system on the subject property if such a system is required. F. A.LISOURO WOOLVIN PATTEN DONALD 0. FLEMING GEORGE M. HARTUNG MEADE EMORY LEON C.MISTEREK DWAYNE E.COPPLE THOMAS O. MCLAUGHLIN JOHN F. COLGROVE C. DEAN LITTLE LAWRENCE £.NAPO ROONEYJ.WALDBAUM • • LESOURD, PATTEN, FLEMING. HARTUNG & EMORY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANA BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154 1206) 624-1040 December 2, 1980 Mr. Ruben Salant S & M Investments 19800 Pacific Highway South Seattle, WA 98188 Re: City of Tukwila, LID No. 30 BRUCE G.HANSON RICHARD P. MATTHEWS 0. WILLIAM TOONE DANIEL D. WOO CARL J. CARLSON P. WARREN MAROUARDSON LAWRENCE A. M.ZELENAK JULIE G. WADE ROBERT L. PALMER COUNSEL Dear Mr. Salant: At its regular meeting on December 1, 1980, the City Council authorized me to institute condemnation proceedings, if necessary, to acquire the right of way needed for LID No. 30. I believe we might be able to avoid such proceedings if you would file an application to have a portion of South 152nd Street vacated in order to allow you to proceed with the construction of your condominium units in that area. This will provide the City Council with a matter which will require formal action. The sooner such a petition for vacation if filed, the sooner this matter may be resolved. Very truly yours, Le OURD, PATTEN, FLEM,NG, HAfTUNG & EMOR LEH:sk cc: Mr. Peter Buck Mayor Frank Todd Mr. Ted Uomoto Lawrence E. -'t Ci/ r -4. LI%�d (d %L4h1U794 Syt�O�S/�J Ye, �"�z'B of *AV l� •*0 /-P/' 7-1E‘Q14 tiros)/ (-(f 1V/-T tivu -757? 7P e.fp7 ce.../()P_//d P'!k A -Eg/rie,m,/ bupPy "pi/00p a nat Z 5far3 Aplrtr'i J' ./u