Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-278-85 - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - 44TH PLACE CENTERWESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES 44T" PLACE CENTER 44T" PLACE SOUTH BETWEEN SO.134TH & SR 599 EPIC 278 -85 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Becky Kent, CPS Tech - DATE: March 19, 1986 SUBJECT: Reactiviation of EPIC - 278 -85 and building permit application CN -85 -164 Per the Development Review Committee at their March 12, 1986, meeting it was decided that a new environmental checklist and :building permit application would be required, and that all previous concerns were still need to be addressed. Per my conversation with Judy Stoloff on March 13, 1986, this information was conveyed. I suggested that she set up a meeting with Phil Fraser to discuss the hydrological study, and Moira Bradshaw to discuss the Planning issues. • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (208) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM: Becky Kent DATE: March 11, 1986 SUBJECT: CN -85 -164, Western Pacific Properties Fill Application Western Pacific Properties would like to reactivate their request for a fill permit for the property located east of 44th P1. S., between S. 134th and SR 599. The outstanding requirements as noted previously were: 1. SEPA determination. 2. Hydrological report on the building pad site The applicant would like to know specifically, what must be submitted in order for us to complete our review. Judy Stoloff has been in contact with the Public Works Department regarding the hydrological study to determine the 100/25/10 year storm events, and was referred to KCM to obtain information on the City's Green River Flood Plain Study. This information has not yet been provided. Please review your past SEPA comments on this project and provide specific requests for information which will be necessary in order to complete the environmental review and issue the building permit. - These requirements will be directed to the applicant in writing. Attachments 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 . Gary L VanDusen, Mayor October 30, 1985 Don Moody Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Re: 44th Place Center Dear Mr. Moody: The City has not received any response from you concerning the environmen- tal review process on the above subject property. A letter from Rick Beeler on September 17, 1985, stated that if we had not received additional information from you within thrity (30) days, we would close the file. This is formal notification that the file is closed and any future review would be with a new checklist and EPIC File number. Moira Carr Bradshaw Assistant Planner cc: Planning Director File (MOODY1) ( #1B) /ks City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard 2p Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor September 17, 1985 Don Moody Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, WA 98168 Re: 44th Place Center Dear Don: This letter is a follow -up to the City's Environmental Review process wherein on August 5, 1985, a copy of our concerns was sent to Judy Stoloff. These concerns related to the site plan included in the Environmental Checklist, and one of the paramount concerns was that the proposal did not reflect the required building setbacks. Since we haven't heard from anyone for over a month now, our concern is whether this application is still proceeding. Should an additional 30 days pass without receipt of the required information, we may have to close this file. If you are continuing to pursue this project, please so inform me in writing in order that I may keep the file open to receive your forthcoming information. L. Rick Beeler Associate Planner cc: Planning Director /ks (MOODY) ( #1B) CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM • • CN EPIC FILE TO: I1 BLDG © PLNG [j P.W. [i FIRE (l POLICE ( j P & R PROJECT U/Ji '/t/ ) 11! 1 ' f("y2Aif /-6-�/ LOCATION 44P' 3, J34/ x`' FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED &-V-Y6- ' RESPONSE REQUESTED BY &-/715- RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. DATE -7? COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM Err'VIRONlENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ( BLDG i PLNG PROJECT (//,1j€ €'/// 44 i LOCATION 1/1/11' )1' .5, jar/ I- DATE TRANSMITTED is -1Ov 15 STAFF COORDINATOR P.W. •CN g5753- EPIC FILE FIRE gitIPOLICE r7 :7A,t � FILE NO. P & R RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.. ITEM COMMENT APPLICATION TO FILL AND PRELOAD AT THIS SITE WILLHAVE MINIMAL =ACT UPON POLICE SERVICES. DUE TO THE EXISTING WAREHOUSING AND SMALL BUSINESS FACILITIES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA SOME TRAFFIC CONGESTION CLAY OCCUR DURING THE MORNING AND POSSIBLY EVENING PEAK HOURS. APPLICANT SHOULD BE MADE AWARE OF SOME INCIDENTS QF VANT)ALTSM AND THEFTS, PARTICULARLY SMALL TOOLS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT SIMILAR. SITES IN THIS AREA DURING EARLY CONSTRUCTION STAGES. THE APPLICANT SHOULD • CONTACT THg TUKWILA POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER AT 433 -1822 FOR ASSISTANCE IN THIS PROBLEM; 6 -14 -85 pji�'1/� DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA t E _ . n we hi w CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM JUN 1 1 195 BY TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREU ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG PLNG n P.W. FIRE PROJECT u4(Jti/1/ yq ,c (677o..f /-..t4/ LOCATION 'y)' )4% 3, ,/,5P- DATE TRANSMITTED &-10-Y6-- p 1D" Y6 • CN EPIC FILE POLICE [l P & R STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Lo -/7-85 RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT DATE No L/1 v / ran ni -e."c A -/ 6911 c-e /1S U7 — (tea Sc 6941,44i h/G c ` .. Ccn /` -C(y 4 ra' %itj E1740 I- 41/ r /44(ei --- cavil-4_1,g_ 4 bo7 • b ((dolls _ o f- -• ce-wi p l.e € o.e. e 4-c bo77i 614iiI /1j (2_-c //4ne) rt r,-:.. CL MILK S s4-• e4.-. &Gc r-ed , d— & VIA c vi ( COMMENTS PREPARED BY s 577- -7 jC.P.S. Frm 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM • ICN 35-155' EPIC o1%�' ?56- FILE -� TO: n BLDG n PLNG P.W. (-1 El FIRE n POLICE © P & R PROJECT azJi &V/j/ jg/ ' 0-2,,f 7 evii LOCATION "/ 94% 3, )34/A- FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED &-/61 -85 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Gp- /7-(15 STAFF COORDINATOR 6!„6, �� . RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE S COMMENTS PREPARED BYY�_ /����.e�.,.,� _,C.P.S. Form 11 OF TUKWILA • iENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN g5-/55- EPIC 91Y 45- FILE • ENVIRONMENTAL EVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG 0 PLNG Q P.W. Q FIRE 0 POLICE Q P & R PROJECT LOCATION 4410' 0% ,3, FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED /0-)0'15- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY e'- /7-,5' STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISS.I.ON.,_B_OAR.D_0ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE AT ACHED— CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING—FORM. ITEM COMMENT Coaq ate, j V437;t1/85,5i0-* f DATE ce%( COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 Controo. Epic File No. Fee $100.- '`°' . OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST JUN 7 1985 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 44th Place Center 2. Name of applicant: Western Pacific Properties BUILDING Vii, 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Don Moody 13975 Interurban Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98168 4. Date checklist prepared: May 15, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Filling and preloading to occur on approval or permit. Actual fill operation to take three to four weeks during six month period after approval. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The building facilities will be constructed. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known_ Tt is possible that the adjoining property development to west, which included the adjoining road improvement at 44th Place South, addressed the development of this property. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila filling permit. Building permits and utility and road permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The existing site of approximately 44,000 s.f. will be filled with two to three feet of fill. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The land is east of 44th Place South (adjoining) between S. 134th St. and S.R. 599. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. . TO, BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANO B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • Evaluation for a. General description of the site (circle one): flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Some clays and organic silts. Some peat. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Strurfural fill from adjoining construction site and excavation from freeway work f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. _None anticipated_ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 80% on completion of project. Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Provide temporary storm drainage system with filter fencing. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air wou . - - from the proposal (i.e., st a omobile industrial wood smoke) during cons uction an when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction dust and equipment exhaust will occur during construction. On completion of project auto fumes will be emitted. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No specifics anticipated. Dust will be controlled during filling with water truck. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Not immediately_ • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. EQtimata Q,Qnn to t, snn r y 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Nnne anticipated.. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will collect in catch basins, pond in parking lot, and on site, then be released as allowed. :.During filling process filter fences will impound soil and runoff. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Development of on -sit and retention system/ • u I.:- 111 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All grass and hriish will ha removed_ c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. • 410 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The final project when constructed will be landscaped. Earth fill and preload will not be landscaped at this time. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not specifically. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Landscaping. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. - 1/0*- oil. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy- efficient equipment. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None anticipated. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None proposed. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 11, Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Freeway traffic. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or . associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Truck traffic and earth- spreading and compaction ecdnipment, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None during construction. Building design in future will consider the freeway traffic. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Road south, vacant to east, freeway to north, manufacturing to west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not recently. c. Describe any structures on the site. move exist_ d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -1 (Light Manufacturing) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Same. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Nn i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not known at this time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: nPGig per rnrie and review by the city Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Filling will not rise above existing road. Future buildings will be within code. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will not occur with the filling project. Some may occur under building in future. ■ b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not-anticipated. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? City parks, golf course. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No_ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Nnne known_ Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nnne proposed 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. I -5, SR 599, Interurban Ave., So. 134th St., 44th Place S. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance,to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Parking not proposed under the site filling proposed. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No specific needs anticipated at this time. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, -generally describe. Not anticipated. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Vehicular trips under this proposal will be construction /earth hauling. Estimate at 20 trips per hour. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Not at this time. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Ultimately when buildings are built the above will be required. For filling there are few such requirements. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Proposed at this time_ 16. Utilities • a. Circle utilities rrently available at the site: atural ary to Muse servi 9, er, septic system, other. ac o t ese utilities has been extended into the site. Storm drainage also serves the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,. the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Nnne at this time Side rnnnertinns fnr all utilities exist to property_ C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Don Miles 641 -1462 Date Submitted: 15 May 1985 Evaluation for Agency Use Only . TQ. BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN1 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. .Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Water discharge will be controlled by storm drainage retention. Additional emissions will occur from construction and from vehicles using the site. Limited noise increase will be detected next to freeway. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Installation of a storm drai naop collection and drainage cyctem 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Some winter wet —land will he filled, although area is dry in summer_ Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: No specific measures proposed at this time. Landscaping will add to environment. Drainage course should concentrate water, perhaps extending length of wet area. • • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Use of energy- efficient heating and cooling equipment, use of insulation and cold warehousing. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Some intermittent wPt.lands may be altered similar to the adjoining project being completed. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Concentrate watercourse to free ditch area. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Nn Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: None proposed. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Should comply. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The girp hac anticipated the road and utilities required at the site_ Each has been extended to the site Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such .demand(s) are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts anticipated. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None pr posed. TO'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To fill a site with suitable earth, raising the ground level to that of the adjoining roadways, thus creating a suitable and adequate building pad. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? As previous development plans allowed the adjoining roads and sites to be filled, this site must also be filled to coordinate the driveways and utilities. There are no practical means to accomplish the proposed alternative, while elevating the site to new grades and developing a cost - effective buidling pad. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The filling course of action other than no course at all is the preferred action, the only means by which the property can be developed. � gess !Poov J ,t 0 0 n 30 f. 041.1,7 .4 T,1• • , •or I.1aa.ti. •• •,1• am . - •aco Ra A • • At OA �. + vrit ►1 .f.r.17•KA0Af• f. iVV. 4f /4 �••• N,' , o fr, • I,e /of A0r. g ..•.re . .. S �' zitG III _ wfr1Aftr _ •A•N .,•••1 '.%Z /,TN /• ,s ^ (.r• it LIrnsts 8 37 37E e09, . Or •••• • " ✓wr/ti Co or �••' •• •. • . lI• .1 0' ±0 ■ •se IO •.s Jt• 4. A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 6 through 10 inclusive in Block 4 of Fostoria Garden Tracts Subdivision Blocks 1 -5 in King County • l I Z1 s Nave.;.? IUC ?u.:' d 2t{ 11.■<I1.4Co Itty - jLC.•�t�r?.. C o n c . a oN CLt�.J vbaio `'Cb 8 rk ■ s..,@ .7:-4... �.i Y/ t .4.'14134 r J +gin v��ti�ta. • 4:'i r7t$rj:. prQPk,.Orc 1•aa LOGe,T10N'. "69114,-1-1, '5 % %As.' - =- - Tk itit � i i ice..;. ` � . � ► JR C: A1S Nto(ur... r �t i•J�cle�.C� i�NU �1L1,1i� P20J (.i STh7'ST1C.'�, (A -1 L1 t' 44 12.5 UIC U.)1 t.•1�. , • CS <<►�r.rt�L:' ' 'NMN I mtim t,,crt -5131.: t`1 oar " L.■ 3TCab. MV'..al: Pb s. es,/ m..JJ cap) . Qr�- I R.�a.4 (t -C.'T .. 2 1.: oT% LIST 1 1'� 4,>n 'i'r LOT Ze ? a '5.13/ . T .7440 /3,1‘.0 S.t• 1J"9c, 82OO 4..,F.. c,Qr/ .a.. ,.y%.9 °A, c.Uve.e. t'<..L 30.7 :caPobRt:. v'b&: P4- coca* ∎C.6c/ WINO -LA -JUST r.� r•; • P1.kax, 'aZtc,?`o : (/ I Ooo 000 C").% ?Pate.' 442 PROVlocty ; k1J'Cr.) 4- 1 Tzvc,ir._ g Lo kcm m►aTILLY 2a" /:a. oFt+� L� -S P21►J1 L& (L,C -ec- a..' .� Ooc,J 4.. • '5 \0115 O L 1!l 7c:+ . C, \ r,), • t 4tt. Yts d• " RS.114c- 020 LAr+'O c. P4P PC %ROo: PR O N'T 14 213 15'.. 'Gt tri. e•.2 a (LU SzgR.■ tehtl,ll tt; V.f o% •s -r" 0 a rlrG.%t _`e - -,ct.J cnt ik I c? L? (t i\ ST:� ni .r �a.ti ; t.►V1_1 C.`1 �. r .) o .. � rj qtte.R caenD ^`,4 �J c;,r J it \~i. f't' �,) u 11C-'1-• ,=;r Tc? V N 144•4..r.:n2, P1n3G11E- W CT).+ IT:-) ("wro(e. -rn tOTt i. r•J 1' . G1't"Y 'Pi.►olz. 1- ,1z. p1„ o,ZU. ) VP vtL.t 1%'1 i {uN 7 CITY OF T1 PLANNING MILES CONSULTING. (206) 041 -1402 10020 8.E. 24T11 8T. PELIeVUe, WA. 060011 . KWILA! DEPT.. Z.0 3 t.-> 7%4 1.4■T ■(7) CA= k.A.) I t mr,t-tt.L.,1) tZ To Ict T t•A /4.7 C:**4. OF \O. 0 ° 1"A a. t.) ' L . - • • • • •••.. • !",, MMIHWR • rJUN r 1985 ' DIV OF T(.17‘;ILA •PLANNING DEPT. • •