Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-28-89 - BEDFORD PROPERTIES - GATEWAY NORTH TWO BUILDINGGATEWAY NORTH PHASE II BEDFORD PROPERTIES OFFICE / WAREHOUSE / INDUSTRIAL BUILDING EAST MARGINAL WAY SO. EPIC -28 -89 1 MEMORANDUM From: Vernon Umetsu ,( To: Ron Cameron RE: Gateway North Traffic Mitigation Date: October 25, 1989 Per Dave Kehle, Project Architect, the County has already collected some mitigation payments for improvement of the 116th /E. Marginal intersection from at least two other office buildings. No improvements have as yet been made so we may want to see about acquiring those payments since the road is now in Tukwila. This raises the question of other unspent mitigation payments which may have been made to the County for road segments now in Tukwila. cc: Beeler, Pace • • City of Mi iHa PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6300 Soulhcenler Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Ross A. Earnst, P.E. Director MEMORANDUM TO: RICK BEELER /VERNON UMETSU /DARREN WILSON FROM: PHIL FRASER '.4 DATE: OCTOBER 23, 1989 SUBJECT: BLA REVIEW OF GATEWAY NORTH FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT REVIEW THROUGH PLANNING DEPARTMENT — PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW COMMENTS THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE PROVIDED FOR THIS REVIEW: 1. PHASE I GATEWAY NORTH — KING COUNTY PERMITS AND OTHER APPROVALS INCLUDING WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES HYDRAULIC PERMIT, US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 404 PERMIT, WSDOT DRAINAGE PERMIT, KING COUNTY REZONE AND SUBSTANTIAL USE PERMIT, DOE WATER CERTIFICATION. 2. 10/19/89 REVISED BLA MAP 3. OCTOBER 17, 1989 BARGHAUSEN LETTER TO PHIL FRASER RESPONDING TO PUBLIC WORKS CONCERNS AND INFORMATION REQUESTS. 4. COPY OF APPROVED INTERURBAN AVE. BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT BY KING COUNTY. 5. TRIP GENERATION STUDY AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED BY TVA CONSULTANTS FOR COUNTY. 6. OCTOBER 13, 1989 BARGHAUSEN LETTER TO NICK OLIVAS 7. REFERENCE FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE PLANS INCLUDING PHASE I AND FUTURE PHASES — FOR REFERENCE ONLY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE 10/19/89 MAP AND PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS RELATED TO THE CITY'S BLA PROCESS ONLY: 1. THE PROPOSED DIKE EASEMENT REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY SHALL NOW BE IDENTIFIED FOR REQUESTED FOR DEDICATION TO THE CITY. ALSO, THE FORMAT OF THE EASEMENT SHALL BE PER AN EXAMPLE PROVIDED BY PUBLIC WORKS AND AGREEABLE TO THE TUKWILA CITY ATTORNEY. FINALLY, THIS EASEMENT SHALL INCLUDE A TRAIL EASEMENT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S RECREATION DIRECTOR (SAMPLE INCLUDES TRAIL ELEMENT). • • MEMORANDUM RICK BEELER /VERNON UMETSU /DARREN WILSON OCTOBER 24, 1989 PAGE TWO THE DEDICATION THIS EASEMENT SHOULD GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ACCEPTANCE AS PART OF THE BLA PROCESS, IF POSSIBLE. 2. BECAUSE STORM AND WATER LINES CROSS BLA BOUNDARIES, AN INTERPROPERTY EASEMENT FOR SAID FACILITIES WHICH IDENTIFIES HOW THESE LINES WILL BE REPAIRED, MAINTAINED AND /OR REPLACED BETWEEN THE OWNERSHIPS. THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE BLA PROCESS. 3. IT IS NOTED THAT WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY LETTERS FROM WD #125 AND VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. 4. IT IS NOTED ON THE REVISED BLA MAP THAT A 50' INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BLA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADWAY AND UTILITIES. THIS EASEMENT SHALL IDENTIFY HOW ROADWAYS AND UTILITIES WILL BE REPAIRED, MAINTAINED AND /OR REPLACED BETWEEN THE OWNERSHIPS. 5. THE BLA DOES NOT IMPACT TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS DETERMINED BY THE COUNTY. THE BLA DOES NOT OBLIGATE THE CITY TO ACCEPT THE TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS REQUIRED BY KING COUNTY. ATTACHMENTS XC. RON CAMERON PAT BRODIN DEVELOPMENT FILE: GATEWAY NORTH BLA COMMENTS SEP 181989 `'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Contr4IINo. Epic File No. 2 $ -- 8`i Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 2 2-1 7 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable :\/ 001 ROD 2. Name of applicant: 3. ddress and phone nu ber •f app. can and contact person h B\Y i i JIB' , • 1' • /• 4. Date checklist prepared: CI . 1J•A 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. ' •posed imin• or schedule (in ludin. phasing, i appli ble): 2 : FMC !l ikatafi 1i�! ___ 1 %I . • • li r� .� ►]ice .� L 4 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related t ;•r connecte• with thi proposal? I yes, explain. �.: ✓► 111/...- 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will •e prepared directl related to this proposal. 17,.- X77 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals a�ectly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • 10. List any governmen approval or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be s mari zed here. ii, ;0) _A . 1. F .rli1. I__. 5V_/ i3O . _ // II A . O. 1 :F111TG• J. .,." 11U .., :./ .iris 4I 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- ions related to this checklist. 1 > • . !. !. IIJ L /✓, %. _mil �r� _�2 ►: - • - - 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land U'se '' Polic Plan Map as en ironmentall sensitive? _tai lh &l OE ' ?NB • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, er b. What is the steepest Sloe Qr�,the site (approximate percent slope)? '� vv c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, pecify them and note any pr me armland. A20 it4r 0. h:AP 's. t J_,.1- '.AiIMMIR- *G-�►; d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils 1n the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of, f i l U, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, se If s gene�ry describe. M �Mbt� g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after proje t construct'on (for example asp alt or building )? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or ther impacts to the e•rth, if any: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally escrib and giv approximate quant'ties if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect our proposal? If so, generally 'escribe 9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or her ' mpacts to air, if any: la k_ r • fa.. 1.= 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what ream or r'v- it flows into ittAp_ Lai..;✓ !._... 7J■4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe .nd attach ilable plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fillaa��erial. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if k,gown. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodpl in? If o, note location on the site plan O� • Ento AriMagliA 1,4/.; 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of di$ charge. 110 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, descr'be. 4 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, eneraily describe. g.IbH L T . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, und, and r off water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs )( grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,.bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind a • amo t of vegetation wi 1 be removed or altered? 4g_ � + ' c. List threatened or a dangered species known to be on or near the site. �05 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to p eserve or - hance !etation on the site, if any: Al ,„,, ►,df /,T IOU ! ,/ ' : /. ' Ir 1:2 ti _► .. -At 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: NiNe mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, trout, herring, shellfish, other: 61 tUIbM(1%1 b. List any threatened or dangered species known to be on or near the site. Is the sit q Rart of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures preser a or enhance wildlife, if any: . _bNll _ Lp%._ 4 I l �1 ;/ • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy 1501111ft oil, wood stove, solor) wi se uses to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether 't will be used fo he.ting, manufacturing, etc. • 44 l .. , a It�lq b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by ad_yaaccent properties? If so, generally describe. NN c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy pacts, if any: 01 LP FaininirSA-111=1/1P31... 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur . as a r sult of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe speciill emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health ards, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equjr�, operation, other) ?___ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate wh t hours not e ould come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise mp acts, any: _ del �� al le 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site an adjacent operties? b. Has the siAeLbeen used f a riculture? If so, d escribe. II yrio!ok or c. Describe any structure •n the ite. >.. go_ _ i .' ( IG i,eJ1.1 I • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is th current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the rrent prehensive plan designation of the site? Irt t✓Ihill retlAIMICet If applicable, what is-the current shoreline master program designation to of the site? g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environm-'tall sensitive" ar-.? If so, specify. 1G r f:. 1►iaa A i. Approximately how many peo le w uld reside or work • the completed project? � ' '� � '40 200 work,_ 17q ttbobt w L ;,,, f%'0, I. Approximately how—luairelpeople would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to a impacts, if any: i-�i16 •id or reduce displacement ).+,Ul�.e1� 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with istin. and projected land ses and p1 ns, if an :I =. L h-Ci 1,6NG VUW1+41$1! es , jaw -.171R10• IzAin4TC046.V. xi,pt ' i ti fX�1 . iIU "- IL1 l4U4 wool. %it Rrth ' off, 141401,Cb� 0 Ml L l m Poop LiP to witurti bow,. iftwo rw,� eI 1ltrt -u 16-arts W1t-1o1 Mao rov, CPrIG5c, Ah� b117W.0 bee* exitWEJ1 !All w% -thooki ®l►• iAOF ‘1143tlit400 41t4 dim 400 jll btl0 W. -12- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whet er high, middle, or low- income housing? di b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. k*4 c. Proposed measures, t9 reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 1 b. What views in the i ed'ate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measure to reduce r control aesthetic i npacts, if . n,,yy: ' '1 �,Qb� �t Lee • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal p odu'c4e? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety h_v and or interfere with views? 1,10 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may ffect your propos 41? ..711 36'j' I,438d104 vikt__�.JQt b `t* d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and 1 re m acts if any: `NW47.1� rt ! I t Get o bNa Eeiz 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tun4ties are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreationalos? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by th pr.'ect or asp icant, if any: ,^ /i• j�:i0 1■ &LAI J i 77 -14- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measu es to reduce or control impacts, if Sat bt�1 any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing ree system. Show on site .1. , if any. .-e14/ y U ' ' ELMAIIMEirairigiariM 01 / ..1011111riarii. 4% 1 " /_, /10 ri b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximape distancgto the nearest transit stop? _- c IIWI . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project ve? How many would he project eliminate? __ /Alloy 1• Or 4i.. •,1 .„12461,44 y'. - I isi • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public o private). 90* hioluiwIL, 'It#, lM • 09 ety teg 1: urt bto �AV • . - .: .. W •3e IW e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally daribe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project ?, If •known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce tation imp acts, if any: r control transpor- 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If generall describe. r ; A,, r !r O? /%111 ri A Piri b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct 'mpacts on public vi es, if any. r(► %L.4.1J0114.14 UMW ALA .7771. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilitie ectricity • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only lable at site: refuse servic septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity Which might De needed t -Yue C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency relying on them to _s d;; ision. Signature: Date Submitted: /$ is PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or . hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- 2#0 D ATE INIT. vs to ACTIVI4 LOG COMMENTS -06 =x /e /& //I / fina /) 14145 uet peso . 1) AceTharl. 1 wA i nc,l“ phr .p