Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-282-85 - CITY OF TUKWILA - 57TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT57T" AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT 57T" AVENUE BETWEEN S. 141ST & S. 147T" ST. EPIC 282 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE 57th Avenue Street Improvement Project Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 57th Avenue between S. 141st Street and S. 147th Street Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC 282- 85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed . environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 30_ /5 Signature Ca-Qf2tA, You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City 200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN )D EPIC 2S2-g,5- • FILE `Oh+ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n ;BLDG PLNG 1/1 P.W. El FIRE n POLICE PROJECT 570', 6V /i/X p/lntet P & R LOCATION 57ea(/`c FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 71845 RESPONSE REQUESTED BYr1 4 STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT NO c? \mr DATE 7 (1r- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 w CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG ( PLNG (l P.W. FIRE PROJECT 57 W; kitilLA24006rita LOCATION 57e a{/`C. DATE TRANSMITTED I NSS RESPONSE REQUESTED BY(ci24s STAFF COORDINATOR° RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. C 95302)() EPIC A7 -g5 FILE ' /A' POLICE ( (P & R' FILE NO. ITEM' COMMENT REC»' 1S�r BY TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREA4 2 �/c2�Yn 41d to r DATE Z 2 ' COMMENTS PREPARED BY� C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: (1 BLDG n PLNG n P.W. FIRE © POLICE n P & R PROJECT 57 a,/76. brrite N 7(4C1/1Qy`ein'Lu LOCATION 571"0,1/r. DATE TRANSMITTED /-1415 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 411CN EPIC 2S2-F.5- FILE TO}' FILE NO. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 4D NEW LANDSCAPING SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION LINES OF SIGHT FOR BOTH PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE TRAFFIC. INCREASED VISABILITY IS A PRIME CONSIDERATION IN ALL NEW SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECTS. 11A LIGHTING....THE PROJECT PLANS SHOW AN UNEVEN BALANCE OF STREET LIGHTING. IT VARIES FROM A LESS THAN 100' PLACEMENT TO IN EXCESS OF 230'. IN SOME SECTIONS LIGHTING IS PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET, IN OTHERS, ONLY DOWN ONE SIDE. OF EVEN MORE CRITICAL IMPORTANCE TO PUBLIC SAFETY THERE IS NO LIGHTING • PROVIDED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF 144 ST, 142 ST. AND THE LIGHT AT 141 St. IS LOCATED A SHORT DISTANCE FROM INTERSECTION. 15B PUBLIC SAFETY...PROPER SIGNING IS CRITICAL TO THE SAFETY OF THE PERSONS RESIDING ON THE IMPROVEMENT. TRAFFIC ENTERING THE AREA FROM THE WEST WILL USE THE 'NEW' 57 AVE. AS AN ARTERIAL TO THE NORTH INSTEAD OF THE DESIGNATED ARTERIAL 58 AVE. STREET ENTRANCES SHOULD PROMENENTLY DISPLAY "NO ARTERIAL" AND "SPEED LIMIT 25" SIGNS. ALL CROSS WALKS SHOULD BE STRIPPED AND A CROSS WALK.SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AT THE "T" INTERSECTION OF 57 AND 142. • 7/22/85 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM r TO: E1 BLDG PLNG P.W. I ( "FI��RE� f POLICE [ P & R PROJECT 57 ,2, ,� 'Y.1,1- N,LGy(orj nt LOCATION 57kiaAx. CN 5c5-02)e) EPIC 02S2-4g',5 FILE T/+ FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 7"1815 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 2'g5- STAFF COORDINATOR ,V1 L' —. RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE J S-- COMMENTS PREPARED BYcA -.... _..„, C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM •CN .,;?) EPIC 2 -g5 FILE T/Pr TO: [j3 BLDG n PLNG 1 1 P.W. I (FIRE n POLICE( ( P & R PROJECT 67,2t t , i Ukr( ii Ci1` nt t LOCATION 5 7ea{/C. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 0l„1=iR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM " COMMENT <-49 /72,99,,oef /7 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY TY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CN EPIC M- R5' FILE `?/P' TO: r-MBLDG PLNG 1 P.W. Fl FIRE [j POLICE ( P & R PROJECT 57 t, N mpAventt* t LOCATION 57ea{/`C. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED ,4 15 STAFF COORDINATOR' RESPONSE REQUESTED BY( ?) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 6/r-1 cpcksr DATE / -6c COMMENTS PREPARED BY, v C.P.S. Form 11 Conti, No.. Epic File No. a12-75 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 57th Avenue Street Improvements 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Dept. .of Public Works 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 433 -1800, Phil Fraser 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed 'timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No information has been prepared. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None s. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City Council approval of Street Improvement Plans. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed .uses and the size of the project and site. -There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The proposed project involves approximately 1900 linear feet of improvements to 57th Avenue South. Improvements include pavement widening, adding curb and gutter to both sides, sidewalks, handicap ramps at street intersections. improving the storm drainage system, driveways repairs and minor adiustments to manhole covers and valve boxes. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and 'topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. .The project is on 57th Avenue South between S. 141st Street and S. 147th Street. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• 110 Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Hilly b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 19% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy silt and brown clay silt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No surface indications of unstable soils. Residents in area report past problems with banks sluffing. but corrected with proper drainage. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The grading and filling will be done to provide for wider raod and improved sight distance. The fill will be either native material or imported embank- ment material from an approved borrow site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. because of soils clay content, the soil is prone to softening and mudding.if subjected to frequent or heavy traffic loads or construction disturbance under wetter - than - optimum moisture conditions. 9. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 65 to 80% of the 40 -foot wide right -of -wav will be covered with asphalt and concrete. 50 to 60% of right -of -wav is presently covered with asphalt and concrete. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Implementation of temporary erosion control measures . as required by project specifications and City. Areas not paved will'be sodded. 2. Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some temporary emissions from construction equipment during construction will result. After construction emissions will be same as exist today. No increase in traffic projected. All such emissions will be under guidelines of Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None required by proponent. Federal and state laws provide necessary controls. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, . describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: valuation for gelki :'Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) .Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. A hydraulic analysis of this drainage basin was prepared as part of this protect. The increased pavement will result in some increase in stormwater runoff, but proposed improve- ments to the storm drainage system will improve drainage within the roadway system. Some existing problems will be eliminated and othersproblem reduced. The storm drainage pipes will continue to connect to same downstream pipes and ultimate points of discharge will not be changed. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Curb and gutters will be constructed to collect runoff and non -paved areas will be sodded to reduce runoff impacts. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing vegetation will be removed where required to allow for widening of roadway. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation ''for Agency Use Only. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Vegetation adjacent to the existing roadway consists generally of landscaped yards and scattered trees on vacant lots. The road improvements have been designed to retain as much existing vegetation as possible. Any existing landscaping which will be disturbed, will be moved or replaced in kind. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing traffic noise will not affect the site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction activities will cause a temporary increase in noise levels. City code allows con- struction noise between 7 :00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Noise levels to be controled by Feder -1, State and City regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 57th Avenue is a residential street and adjacnet properties are single- family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? .If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -1 -7.2 Single- family 7200 s.f. min. lot size. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single - family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The street will be improved to residential street standards. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed .measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NnnP 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any . proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? The City of Tukwila trail system goes west from 57th Ave. N. and 142nd and south from 57th Ave. and 141st. No other recreational opportunities exist in the immediate vicinity. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. The new sidewalk will provide for eas er access to the trail system. • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project is for improvement of existing public street. Connecting streets include S. 141st, S. 142nd and S. 147th Streets. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance.to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would have 14 parking spaces between 141st and 144th: and 20 spaces between 144th and 147th. Many of the existing parking spots do not conform to City Ordinances and regulations for on- street parking. Parking spots are in areas where pedestrians should walk. The project will eliminate 12 spaces between 144th and 147th, and add 4 spaces between 141st and 144th. All of the developed lots, except one, have a minimum of 2 on -lot parking spaces as required by City Codes. -15- • • Evaluation for d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. the proposal is for improvement of existing street. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Agency Use Only S0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ce1-ectricit n.t r_a. a -vat 4.1 se service, ,IAII*0041,01Liamitary sewer. septic system, ot1 r. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which .might be needed. None C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICIN E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objectives are to improve the existing public street and utility corridor in keeping with current City of Tukwila standards. The proposed improvements are limited by existing narrow right -of -way and topography. To provide curb, gutter and sidewalk, and to provide an improved roadway surface requir- ing less maintenance than present roadway. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The alternative means are to acquire addi- tional right -of -way and construct a wider roadway. This alternative would provide additional on- street parking, but would impact the private properties to a greater extent. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The alternative means would reduce . lot sizes by acquisition of property. The cost of improvements are greater than proposed improvements. With a wider street, access to some properties would require major changes. The preferred course of action is proposed improvement as shown on the plans. Evaluation for Agency Use Only