Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-284-85 - FOSTORIA PARK ASSOCIATES - ANNEXATION / 2 OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDINGSFOSTORIA PARK BUILDINGS D, E & F S. 134T" PLACE & 43RD AVE. S. [P1 C- 284 -85 • • WAC 197 -11 -970 CORRECTED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (Originally issued September 13, 1985 for only the annexation) Description of Proposal 1. •Annexation of approximately 2.36 acres to the City. 2. Construction of two office /warehouse buildings consisting of a total of 73,000 sq. ft. on a 5.47 acre site in the City. Proponent Fostoria Park Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any easterly portion of the intersection of S. 134th Place and 43rd Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 284 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. (l There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date October 16, 1985 Signature 1)11-01A You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433-1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor October 2, 1985 Holly Miller, Director Department of Planning and Community Development 811 Alaska Building 618 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Comments on Fostoria Associates Annexation DNS (File #EPIC - 284 -85) Dear Ms. Miller: We have received your comments on this determination. We have corrected the checklist to show the appropriate King County zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation. We have further communicated your concerns regarding drainage and soils to the Public Works and Building Departments and requested that particular care be given to site preparation. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Brad Collins Planning Director cc: Ross Earnst, City Engineer Tom Hill, Building Official /ks (FOSTORIA3) (4C.3) • • King County Executive Randy Revelle ,. i. r' 2 C 1985 j Department of Planning and Community Develop - - P! - .� 1"' ! "'G DEPT. Holly iller, Director September 23, 1985 Mr. Brad Collins Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: DNS on Fostoria Associates Annexation (File No. EPIC - 284 -85) Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed this determination and submit the following comments. LAND USE f Item B.8.e.: The current County zoning is S -R (Suburban Residential, 4 to 6 /acre). Item B.8.f.: The current County Comprehensive Plan designation is "Urban ". The Highline Community Plan designates the site Single Family, RS 7200 (4 to 6 units /acre). As proposed, the anticipated land use is inconsistent with current zoning and applicable community plan designations. / SURFACE WATER Given the large amount of fill required for the "low ponded area and the presence of the drainage course, we suggest that particular care needs to be given site preparation. Drainage and soils conditions should be carefully considered to avoid long term effects after development. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. HM:MG:me Sincerely, M LLER Director cc: Steve Miller, Deputy Director, Department of Planning and Community Development ATTN: Meredith Getches, SEPA Coordinator G. Brice Martin, Executive Secretary, Boundary Review Board 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-7503 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S .7 13 1995 ` TUKEN V4RON PLANNING DEPT. ,BACKGROUND 'Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fostoria Park Buildings Name of applicant: Fostoria Associates /Rober.t Storseth, Inc. Coin Epiic File No. Fe S100.00 Receipt No. ENTAL CHECKLIST and F., Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 15610 S. E. 24th Bellevue, WA 747 -5665 . Date checklist prepared: July 10, 1085 Agency requesting Checklist: • City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule .(including phasing, if applicable): AMENDMENT TO EC T o you aye any p ans for `future additions, expansion, or further activity elated to-'or connected with this proposal? If yes; explain. he owner is asking the City of Tukwila to.vacate a very small pipce.of property at the nur Lhwest, corner of the si Le near S.134th. P1 .See attached 8 1/2 x Tl partial site 4..) du fur exdc.L totct .run. 2. We are concurrently requesting approval for annexation to the City of Tukwila (see attached legal description). 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or wild be prepared, directly related to this proposal. AMENDMENT TO CHECK LIST) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.1‘. Permit application for property vacation with•the City of Tukwila. 2.- Annexation approval to the Lity of Tukwila • Amf5400461.1 -C"o 64e614_ '-6-r 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building permits Occupancy permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that- ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repnt those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Three concrete and glass office /warehouse buildings with a total building area of 73,000 s.f.± on 238,444 s.f.± site A E►DU ► TO CHECK LIS nc uses in e proposa i s o annex e si e o th.e City of ! ukwi.l a boundries. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See legal description (attached) and proposed site plan (attached) 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No -3- v.,c90-_----- SEP 131985 ,""Y i�. !Ct;WILA PLANNING DEPT. . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAANT d. _;,ViRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General- description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, the) Gradual slopes b. Wnat is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3-4%± c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils on the site range from good sand and gravel--- native to clay - sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is a low ponded area which will be filled and preloaded as required e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be apprulmately 12.000 c.y. of axicting preload moved to the west Nrtion of the site f: Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, .construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes - Erosion is possible during clearing and construction. All soils will be stablized by landscaping and pavement for truck maneuvering and parking About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75 -80% Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1urin4_9Ds_tructjon installation - per erosion control_ plan and s_e_dent,_ fence. After construction there will be no 2T4 _Sion_____ 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would resu t from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any., generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust and vehicle emissions during and after construction b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. ..ose• measures o reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust from construction phase could be reduced by keeping the street clean as possible 1. Required by the City of Tukw.i_la. 3. Water a: Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, currently_ there is_an open drainage course along the north- west property line -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and a :tach available plans. - -Yes - A new fall out struct. will be required and the drainage course will feed into a treatment 5 cmp pipe out to 133rd St. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would- be affected. Indicate the source of fill Ii erigla� A portion of building FF site the preload from the site of Building "E" 4) Will the proposal require surface rater withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Drainage course will be diverted into an cmp pipe per #2 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water.be withdrawn, or will water to discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. All sewage will be collected and cQnne�ted Q existing S.S. lines in S. 134th. St. and /or S. 133rd St. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The only runoff is from storm water and ill be collected in on -site sheet retention ponds. ten will be drained at a contrQ L1ed rate. into existing storm system • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, . ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: 61 de r maple, aspen, evergreen tree: shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Entire site will be stripped as required by the soils report to construct the buildings on the site fir, cedar, pine, other c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: proposed landscaping will match _ buildings A.B &C to the best of pur knowgdge at this time. 5. Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds,6the> Starlings /crows, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • 6. Energy and Natural Resources • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What kinds of energy electric. natural ;) oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe ti .hether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The natural gas and electricity will he used for halting na and cooling_ Other requirements will be_.s t__ at the time the space is leased b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation feat.res are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: proposed project will meet the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code for heating, cooling, lighting, thermal insulation and glazing 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Remise theSP buildings ar s.pec exact . tenants are not known at this time. Tenants will be as allowed in an M -1 Zone. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nn cpPrial PmergPnry SPrvirec wed. Standard fire and police protection e required 2) Proposed measures to reduce or.control environ- mental health hazards, if any: No environmental hazards b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation; other) traffic. None which will affect the project 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: 'traf- fic, construction, operation, othehhr)? Indicate wL0nghtc�rm —ven cele • uratf- °mwilrlobettfiesoniy , Evaluation for Agency Use Only noise. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. I 1 Short term —noise generated from construction of the project. Hours will be approximately 7:00;a.m. to 4:00 p.m 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 1 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the properties? North - commercial South - residential East commercial West - commercial site and adjacent I 1 b. ..Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No (AMENDMENT TO Ufa 1 IST) c. Describe any structures on the site. There are two houses on the site. has a seperate garage (unattached). 1 d. gill any structures be demolished? Nn If so. ;hat? es - there are two sinale_familL residences with one seperate2rage. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1 °1116 Kiel t o,n1 y rohin � = S-12, ( S J {9J , bw Qb idc4hC � i TJ K ✓i lq '6021' ' 111 /014 current compre' en- ive plan designation to i 8S rJK.n14. c, rlw., �rtiA�Isin�Q If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? f.. Evaluation for Agency Use Only What is of the s the i t2? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive " - area? If so, specify. No 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The occupant load is not known at this time j• Approximately' how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None ME�FNT Ta CHFCK 1 TST1, 1. -Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project meets with all comprehensive code and zoning code to iiehest of—our knowledge. 1. Upon annexation the City of Tukwila would evaluate zohinq the property M -1 light industrial. -12- c. Approximately how many units any? Indicate whether high, housing? None would be provided, if middle, or, low-income A E I pproximate y how many units, if any, would be eli- minated?- Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None 1.. Two middle-income houses 1 Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nnnp pPra & housing 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proPosed? - 21' + from finish floor 1 Principle exterior material will be concrete ' b. What views in the immediate altered or obstructed? None I vicinity would be c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed project will_bLdesignadi to meet, Owner's needs and to provide as liltie_aL: I possible impact on the surrounding concounit Evaluation for Agency Use Only SEP 1 a 1985 CITY (D TWICA PLANNING DEPT. • • 11. Light and Glare a.' What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glazing will match buildings A,B &C which is low glar. Bronze tint glazing b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazdrd or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare - ,impacts, if any: All on -site lighting will be of low'glare 12. 'Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not known b. 'Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed at this time -14- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Ti V1W).5) SE? 13 1985 0111 pl:P.tkik;,li,G, DEPT. • . • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. '.re there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None due to answers of a.& b. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access from S. 134th St., 133rd St. and 42nd Ave.' b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Interurban and 133rd St. c.. How many parking spaces would the completed project have ?, How many would the project eliminate? 139 stalls None • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Number of vehicle trips not known at this time. Peak times 8 -9 a.m. ands -6-57F. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None at this time 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. _ Fire and Police per (7a -1) No impact on shcools and health care b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None due to (a) Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilitie i jtvv'tet41> 4Li'f 14, o+•l -trGl4. L lS-T a. Circle utilities. currently available at the site: natural as tee refuse service (sanitary.i sewers septic system, other. 'mow► Vi KVA Irtgs 0 1.4k b. Describe _the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction, activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. New water meters will be required for all three buildings C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. ' Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAIE D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. Wher1 answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? At this time no increases are anticipated due to the annexation. No toxic or hazardous substances are anticipated within the project. The uses allowed in an M1 (light industrial zone). Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None at this time for annexation. 2,. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? 1 Nnne at this time fnr annexation. 2. All. impacts will be kept to a minimum beyond this non project action. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- - mals, fish, or marine life are: See #2 of #2 above. Evaluation for Agency:Use Only -18- . 3. Hoer would the proposal be likely to deplete lenergyor natural resources? None at this time of annexation. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Same as-above. 4. Hoy; would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated '(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplain,s, or prime farmlands? None at this time of annexation. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Same as above.. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or - encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not a part of shoreline use. -19- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1, . l•n \sEP 13 1985 G;, C; `y p► 4.NNR DEPT. • c �= Evaluation Pori Agency USE Only 1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Not a part of shoreline use. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Same as above 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? None at this time of annexation. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: ' ! Same as above 7.' Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None for annexation process. } S. Does the proposal conflict .with policies of 'the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? To.the best of our knowledge the annexation would not conflict with the City's: comprehensive plan., Evaluation for Agency Use Only ...SO -4 n •- Proposed-measures to avoid or reduce the confliict(s) are: None required due to above. -21- • I A PLANNING C DEPT. :ro BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ' • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for .a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide on a speculative basis office /warehouse space 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternatives 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the . preferred course of action: The preferred course of action is to follow the obiective of #1 LOT 3 of Short Plat NO. 79- 26 -SS, according to the Short Plat survey recorded under King County Recording No. 800424 -0503, and as amended by boundary line agreement recorded under Recording No. 821001 -0841; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of washington; SUBJECT ONLY to Exceptions A, B and C and Exceptions 1 through 9, inclusive, of the Preliminary Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Transamerica Title Insurance Company, Order No. 649700, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and Incorporated herein by this reference. ML./ j j 3.28 STEWART TITLE COMPANY of Washington, Inc. ORDER NO. 14487 - Co IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. PO 1 • • • 4=1 LI cut; rVAI•JAFLy rcrrss-feller aL cocastass ar-chttec-ts .1. .ODO ■••••••• • -ti- t••••• •O.O11•60111 SOS •OSS rPrOe,-.0 Eitil-1)4144.G, f17104A P#4,2-K wAs. 4 r' SIL,I1.11 ISO WO. • • 1 •••■•••• 7,4,44 ••■• jr•li •••••••••• WAC 197 -11 -970 ATTACHMENT A III DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal annexation of approximately 2.36 acres /45y/ J/ OA11) Proponent Fostoria Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any easterly portion of the intersection of S. 134th Place and 43rd Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 284 - 85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not, required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [� There is no comment period for this DNS ID This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by September 28, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, 74A 98188 Date September 13, 1985 Signature L. 'ic' :eeler, Acting Director You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal annexation of approximately 5.5 acres Proponent Fostoria Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any easterly portion,of the intersection of S. 134th Place and 43rd Ave. S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 284 - 85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS ,(j This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by September 28, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila ,WA 98188 Date September 13, 1985 Signature CL. 'ic reeler, Acting Director You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS 1. 0 o0 i r° I. 1 _ma C . y —;6. 1 7' . 76 ' . A=9t6J7, C• estd . iS +77. ZM•A.o ~_ . W 6ECK RD A too .. ,5: O •1 .e i� . .. r It 6� \ 6 NO ,7` \ 4 44 _t. a ∎ 2 " \� yr 0 . s. 0� .. 7 • PY00 k� hi LC 4 0 �� �� (( 30 �5� :(A 'o M a • S39- ,,.4 \) p? kl, 0 .. ,,s • 4 AC ito.r ,774PAf CJFt/C P e,g.N. a•• . iAv sw . :.4ri ,c;/f /is1 _ "e- �a9 07. L3 P• a•T FE /o +aro �- -•Rf /Eil,O 4z.ttRr4'w ate os) •'Tv/flnia.q 9 • ,7., � •iS p0Ci ' 0 ya 5 0t• • 89.57 • .57E LOB. is • A ,.1(1 ‘0 �� • �.. 0. • 4 .7 3 Ac `LOT 3 ti-o 7. 4 v 5a ,0s 01? TUK SP 79 " oG" � - 004240503 --r sd 8 1. M J 4 7 • LOT I ti 16 53,2 AC. ■ • OF � cone' No. Epic File No. 0111`7 �5 JUL 11 1985 Fee S100.00 Receipt No. 670167 040T EN RUI�1Ef9TAL CHECKLIST R V1S D) A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FOSTORIA PARK - BUILDINGS D,E &F 2.. Name of applicant: FOSTORIA ASSOCIATES 3. Address -and phone number of applicant and contact person: FOSTORIA ASSOC. ROBERT E. STORSETH, 15610 S.E. 24th, Bellevue; Wash. PH: (206) 747 -5665 4. Date checklist prepared: JULY 10. 1985 5. Agency 'requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Building "E" to be constructed initially with.Buildings "D" and "F" to follow. Completed schedule for Buy sing E to be Novemier of 98 . Bui sings D an F to •e construc e• in early 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will • be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals .directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? . If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. . Building permits Occupancy permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that- ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. - Three concrete and_gl -a -ss office /warehouse buildings with a total building area of 73,000 s.f.± onv233,4441 s.f.± site 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See legal description (attached) and proposed site plan (attached) 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No , -3- TOBE•COMPLETED BY APPLIC• EVlR.)NMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, (other Gradual slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3 -4 %± c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils on the site range from good sand and gravel native to clay - sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is a low ponded area which will be filled and preloaded as required e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be apppimately 12,000 c.y. of existing prPlnad moved to the .west portion of the site f, Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, '„construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ,Yes - Erosion is possible during clearing and construction. All soils will be stablized by landscaping and pavement for truck maneuvering and parking g About 'what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example., asphalt or buildings)? 75 -80% Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During _construction installation - per erosion control plan and sediment fence. After construction there will be no erosion 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust and vehicle emissions during and after construction b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust from construction phase could be reduced by keeping the street clean as possible 3. Water a: Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes currently tiere—fs..an open drainage course along the north- west property line • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes - A new fall out struct. will be required and the drainage course will feed into a treatment 5 cmp pipe out to 133rd St. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill water i j 1 A portion of bui i ng -s�.te wi 11 be- -F7lfierl -with the preload from the -site, of`Bi,_lding_ ",E 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,. and approximate quan- tities, if known. Drainage course will be diverted into an cmp pipe per #2 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 1 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. All sewage will be collected and cQnectedd_to existing S.S. lines in S. 134th St. and /or S. 133rd St. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The only runoff is from storm water anL11 be collected in on -sure sheet re ention ponds. then will be drained at a controlled rate, into existing storm system Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention 4. Plants a. Check -or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree. . maple, aspen, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: (ttail) buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b., What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Entire site will be stripped as required by the soils report to construct the buildings on the site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed l andscs3.pi no_wi l l match buildings AJU S. the best of our knowledge &t this_ time. 5. Animals a.' Circle am.y birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Starlings /crows, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy lectric. natural s oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The natural gas and electricity will he used for heating and cooling. Other requirements will beset__ at the time the space is leased b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Proposed project will meet the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code for .heating; cooling, lighting, thermal insulation and glazing 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ReCause these buildings are spec_ exact tenants are not known at this time. Tenants will be as allowed in an M -1 Zone. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nn special emergency services required. Standard fire and police protection might be required 2) Proposed measures to reduce or•control environ- mental health hazards, if any: No environmental hazards Evaluation for Agency Use'Only . Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for. 'example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? Exi s.i<iaq_[e.hi c1 e_ traffic. None which will affect the project 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, othehr)? Indicate WLonghterm— vehlcele tra f1c.wilrl °pettnnesonly. noise. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Short term -noise generated from construction of the project. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? North - commercial South - residential East - commercial West - commercial . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, "'describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately•how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None per a & b 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 21' + from finish floor Principle exterior material will be concrete b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Pro.o ed • • 7 • '.e_desigaed_ to meet:Owner's needs and to provide as little as possible impact on the surrounding cojnmunity -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Nn e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -1 f.. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Indiictrial /Commerical g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The occupant load is not known at this time j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project meets with all comprehensive code and zoning code to tie —best of our knowledge • • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glazing will match buildings.A,B &C which is low glare Bronze tint glazing b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All on-site lighting will be of low glare 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not known ti b. `Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed at this time Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None due to answers of a.& b. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access from S. 134th St., 133rd St. and 42nd Ave. b:, Is the site currently served by public transit? If ..not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Interurban and 133rd St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? Hoer many would the project eliminate? 139 stalls None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Number of vehicle trips not known at this time. Peak times 8 -9 a.m. and 5 -6 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None at this time 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If ',so, generally describe. Fire and Police per (7a -1) No impact on shcools and health care b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impact on public services, if any. None due to (a) Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle • • utilities currently available at the site: atural as ter refuse service sane ary sewej septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. New water meters will be required for all three buildings C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decWoA A. G•/46 /miVEL[d„ , A cc, ouktrAlts pit 7" 6w^/&42 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Signature: Date Submitted: 7/1 Order No. 14487 A.L.T.A COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Tract 48, Riverside Interurban Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington, lying south of South 133rd Street (W. W. Beck Road); and That portion of Tract 18, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, in King County, Washington, lying south of South 133rd Street (W. W. Beck Road); , TOGETHER WITH vacated 43rd Avenue South (Squire Street) adjoining; EXCEPT a tract of land in the northwest corner of said premises, the westerly line of which is 157 feet in length; the northerly line of which is 142 feet in length; the southerly line of which is 133 feet in length and the easterly line of which is 127 feet in length. END OF SCHEDULE A • 1771 q7`EW8\RT TITLE y~/���P�����/ ��__�� of Washington, Inc. ORDER NO. /4487~ .•/NPORTANT This is not a Plat Of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. PD, LEGAL DescRrnioN LOT 3 of Short Plat NO. 79- 26 -SS, according to the Short Plat survey recorded under King County Recording No. 800424 -0503, and as amended by boundary line agreement recorded under Recording No. 821001-0841; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington; SUBJECT ONLY to Exceptions A, B and C and Exceptions 1 through 9, inclusive, of the Preliminary Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Transamerica Title Insurance Company, Order No. 649700, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and Incorporated herein by this reference. ML/3j 3.28 'jf0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for ,a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide on a speculative basis office /warehouse space 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternatives 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The referred course of action is to follow the ob' 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 11)UMIi4Ag./ SITE PLAki thceassiTraittlz architects aid Y'10 bh•ld. • ••••111. wash. 00100•1100 a00 5553 PKofo<.a) v UI1-au44 .1),"5.4:r• War-4A PARK TJKV1d.., w POAI122A•IA It K A4.6O41A16, •C••tLI . lob o• ur.W oh•oh•d dote dote r- TO M E� S S SUBJE�C(T: n/� �� DATE c 2. 0c'l iUc( 4 oil LIB , A 03E1 l ^) pl(caL MS ( J vc. (TO CX,(-- a-YL- st(-0Li tiQ "f)(001‘--). E FOLD `"CZyM t S I I l� I 1IOU wY SIGNED T. R E P• L Y DATE: SIGNED ASSOCIATED L1 -A2374 SENDER: DETACH THIS PART AND FILE FOR FOLLOW UP PRINTED IN U:S.A.J TO v A L SUBJECT: T �` A J !ll DATE •OLO .s A FOLD &___11;" ,&_ .4■t istall. 41 LS L at m n l cvN fUMS (E M >lf s._)( Mf a's... sc«a3 .tijmu is teL`N l l CSC( Cpl ioQ IC t Y�SOci,G -morn L sv4A -K 7p / (�u US . $ (him 1 v -�OI` li 1Z__ L 1- 4-1 T l U 1 \ --f-Wi ( Limos ' JC to , I SIGNED R E. P L Y . DATE: SIGNED .j ASSOCIATED L1 -A2374 SENDER: DETACH THIS PART AND FILE FOR FOLLOW UP PRINTED IN U.S.A. Associated TUWAY MESSAGE A__ _1- --• -^ •-•- TO .■Q5.S THIS FORM IS SPACED FOR 'TYPEWRITER AND FITS A WINDOW ENVELOPE SUBJECT: Ce5(2.4 DATE --a CMAAMT Tel*. ck\crt-1-AST S[C.a+T O Cs F7UK 2. e--ffLe5t9[13 4 ( 3. 3\--N24\1\ D1L\tL r) ac-5- r.r.Qsams ovz_Jc! st.4pu L)e ect\s SIGNED T6_ cop 4,6-1--Le s(c1s20,, cr mikA(J,134 Ik IN21051111■WoMINIMITME SAO AZ ALIA! !A A • 0.4stA)r-r -to _cc DATE: ASSOCIATED Ll-A2374 /1-0 tO Dfz oN----) v-9 r r SIGNED PRINTED IN U.S.A. TO LANCE MUELLER ASSOCIATES /ARCHITECT 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 . (206) 325 -2553 criti ®r 1v *todht irbf iG ale p� nreI II1'.1 1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ A ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter E:' ]. 0 1985 C ach •∎ • -• , Ttr it l: ❑ Print ❑ Change ordI er cover via ❑ Plans p jl 1 umaRgeaDirirGJ DATE DATE i JOB NO. 1 DESCRIPTION !� ATTENT ,�` �� �� ' 4 1 it : �► ; I c / it LEX RE: I 4S , ,, . a11 . 1 i '' 1 , 1 ■ EMI I.1' 1 II ?• Val ., I j the I ❑ Samples II ollowing items: , ❑ Specifications. 1 � COPIES DATE i NO. DESCRIPTION I j f I I 1 it : �► ; I IIM 4S , ,, . a11 1 , 1 ■ EMI . • ,r. s/4 . 4Ie- ..Ac' /. Val ., I j THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmi 1 ■ copies for approval 1 J 1 1 I XFor your use ❑ Approved as noted 1 ❑ Submit 1. •� copies for distribution iicAs requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected 'prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ I I 'I• ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS .I • sennun 1I, Le SIGNED: if .nelo.una nn not as noted. kindly notify us at ones. • STORM DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS FOR FOSTORIA PARK BUILDING "E" TUKWILA, WASHINGTON BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS 2009 MINOR AVENUE EAST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102 SEPTEMBER 5, 1985 BRH JOB NO. 85184 .•010.11% ibibs , • IPF 4444 44 in 4%40 <p �F` Vt PRINTED SEP -91985 • 85 /8Y- zsw Ek0 ` U ^ ,<OretZUC_, GA- GCGre-A- 7704.)5 ' VOL,,-7f AE�&{ // 6 . = ( TAT iq)(O. S iti°iie:s ) =C� Y,z_ ,4rCoS))z /Z %r AT- = Z. O% A ceAES = 901 , Z _ (yo, /6 , , Z)(O . ) = 3)-7 S7.05 C ,0040 /yG \/06_6i /'16 /°/20V/067-0 = /2E.nr/I 044Nd (,4qf4 ♦ AREA + 6A) ( ) 3 QLS E s aF BASE = 3 (A6 -+ A 4°ks) h 3' Q,d = /S /, 50' = 7S0 s� As = 68" = z� Z q- 3� 750 + Z, Z4.4- - (7575 XZ, z ) v,o = 3 C� XXCESS = Yip —Vx& .= 4�Z 1-3- 3,757 oS o c) o./‹, • STORM OR4.IN46-E C,41..cue rio/vs ,7 /PE S /0/ ti& r 1._G S . :: *x:$: STORM WATER HYDF:OLOG'', *T** Runoff bx P. t i ona 1 Method STEEL EQUATION COEFFICIENTS: K = 31.01 b _ 9.1 WATERCOURSE TYPES, 1 FOREST w.' HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION • SHORT GRASS PASTURE LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVEDIAREF 7 OTHER FO=;TORIA E :LG . "E" INIT Ti: _ INIT EAC _ OVERLAND FLOW: RUNOFF, 6.110 min 2.5A POINT: CB #4 TO PIPE Tr AREA is RC I O DESIGN 4' DESSIGN = 6 . 4_1 C1 min 0.00 1.00 t1 =Cf 2.05 iri hr 1.04 c f 7.56 ftssec FIPE: INVERT IN = IN'.!ERT OUT LENGTH = DIAM SLOPE O FULL U FULL FLOW TIME 13.70 it • 16.10 ft 13.0A f t O .024 3.33 in 19.99 2.93 cf= 8.39 f t sc.er O .0.? min * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * *:* Runoff L'i Rational Method STEEL EGUHTION COEFFICIENTS: K = 31.01 b = 9 . 1 WATERCOURSE TYPES: 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION • SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY E :ARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY F PAVED AREA 7 OTHER * * * * * * * * ** FOSTOR I A PARK BLG. "E" INIT Tc INIT IAC OVERLAND FLOW: RUNOFF: 6.00 min 1.11 POINT : CE: #2 TO CE: #1 Tc AREA C • 2AC: I I:! DESIGN ✓ DEIGN 6.00 min = 0.00 acre= 1.00 1.11 2.05 in/ hr 2.28 cf= = 4.78 ft/sec PIPE: INVERT IN = INVERT OUT = LENGTH 01AM SLOPE Q •FULL ✓ FULL FLOW TIME _ 14.82 ft 12.59 ft 60.00 ft O .024 10.00 in 3.72- % 2.29 cfs 4.20 f t %sec O .21 miry • • BASIN ANALYSIS FOR FOSTORIA PARK BUILDING E THE BAS. IN UNDER STUDY IS AN AREA OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS, UN- DEVELOPED FORESTED HILLSIDE AND MODERATE COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT. THE TOTAL AREA OF THE BASIN ABOVE THE PROPOSED SITE IS APPROXI- MATELY 105 ACRES (SEE MAP ATTACHED). A BASIN ANALYSIS WAS REQUESTED BY THE C I TY OF TUKW I LA DUE TO CONCERNS THAT THE EXISTING STORM SEWERS SERVING THE AREA MIGHT BE INADEQUATE TO CARRY THE FLOWS CONTRIBUTED BY THE PROPOSED DEVEL- OPMENT. • AS SHOWN ON THE MAP, AND IN THE .FOLLOWING CALCULAT IONS, THE CRITICAL POINT AFFECTING THE FLOW OF STORMWATER FOR THE DEVELOP- MENT I S AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED SITE, WHERE AN EXISTING 18 INCH AND 27 INCH CULVERT PASS UNDER 133RD STREET. ,THE TWO CULVERTS WHICH SERVE THE ENTIRE BASIN ABOVE THE DEVELOPMENT ARE SEPARATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STREET AND JO IN 'ON THE NORTH. THE PORT IONS OF THE BAS N WERE ANALYZED USING AN EST I MATED C FACTOR OF 0.4 AND T I MES OF CONCENTRAT ION CALCULATED USING THE OBSERVED ROUTES SHOWN ON THE MAP. I T WAS FOUND THAT THE 18 I NCH CULVERT CANNOT CARRY THE RUNOFF FROM A TEN YEAR STORM, WHILE THE 27 INCH CULVERT HAS SUFFICIENT TO CARRY THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PRODUCED BY A TEN YEAR STORM WITHIN THE BASIN. OUR PROPOSAL IS TO COMBINE THE TWO BASINS AND PASS ALL THE STORM WATER THROUGH THE 27 INCH PIPE, SINCE BOTH CULVERTS OUTLET AT THE SAME POI NT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STREET. THIS WILL SERVE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF THE UNDER CAPACITY 18 INCH CULVERT. THE CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT THE 27 INCH CULVERT WILL HAVE CAPACITY TO CARRY THE FLOW FROM THE COMBINED BASINS. AS SHOWN ON THE MAP, THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM I S OF EQUAL OR GREATER CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM THROUGH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND SHOULD NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE NEW CONSTRUCTION. �_`�� ��^�l �� /� ] ' 04/ Mao-65 ��^-`��''~~ ���~t+/�o�\)�� ���� ���� **** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY **** ` Runoff b, Rational Method STEEL EQUATION COEFFICIENTS' K = 76.0r. b = 12.18 WATERCOURSE TYPES' 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION : 3 SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVED AREA 7 OTHER *4.144.***** FOSTORIA PARK BLG.. "E" INIT Tc = 32.29 min INIT 3HC = 28.264.- (70'64)(*4-\ • . OVERLAND FLOW: RUNOFF' POINT 42 AVE TO 18" Tc AREA IRC I Q DESIGN ✓ DESIGN PIPE: INVERT IN INVERT OUT LENGTH DlHM SLOPE Q FULL ✓ FULL FLOW TIME 32.29 min O .00 acres 1.00 28.26 O .81 in/hr 2292 cfs 9'43 ft/sec 11.44 ft 9.37 ft ° � 45.00 ft�k6� /5 � Wu o6� O 024 �� 24.00 i ' 4 60 % ^°3� ^�^5'-` � ' 26.27 cfs 8.37 ft/sec O .08 min **** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY.**** Runoff b, Rational Method STEEL EQUATION COEFFICIENTS: K = 37.07 b = 13.22 WATERCOURSE TYPES' 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION & " 3SHURT GRASS PASTURE LHWNS 4 NEHRLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVED AREA 7 OTHER ********** • FOSTORIA PARK BLG "E" INIT Tc INIT :HC = OVERLAND FLOW: RUNOFF: 18.97 13.36t/53.38 x 4 ' FOlNT-1-41, ST. TO 27" 4-6 Tc AREA C • 2HC l Q DESIGN ✓ DESIGN = 18.97 win • = 000'acres = - 1.@0 = 13.36 = 1'15 in/hr = 15.39 cfs = 8.40 ft/sec PIPE' INVERT IN = 11.8? f1 INVERT OUT = 9.35 ft LENGTH .= 60.00 ft n = 0.024 DIAM = 27.00 in SLOPE = 4.20 % Q FULL = 34.37 cfs ✓ FULL = 8.65 ft/sec FLOW TIME = 0.12 min /l./04+ {}/����//�� 6_A //p/L/S C t/GC E �� 1:�** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY **** Runoff b, Rational Method STEEL EQUATION COEFFICIENTS' K = 36.06 b = 12.18 WATERCOURSE TYPES' L FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION 3 SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 'GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVED .AREA 7 OTHER ' • *;:******** • FOSTORIA PARK BLG. "E" INIT Tr • 32'.29 min INIT EHC .= 41.62 x °' OVERLHt=iD FLOW:, RUNOFF' POINT 42 AVE TO NEW 27" . Tc = 32.29 m in AREA = 0 00 acre-17 C = 1:00 ' 2HC • = 41.52 l = - 0.81 in/hr Q DESIGN = 33.75 cfs V DESIGN = 9.86 ft/sec PIPE' • INVERT IN = 11.87 ft INVERT OUT = 9.35 ft: LENGTH = 60.@0 ft n = 0.024 OlHM = 27.00 in SLOPE = 4.20.%.: Q FULL = 34.37 cfs ✓ FULL = 8.65 ft/sec FLOW TIME = / � 0 10 min / � ! SITE DISTANCE CALCULATIONS Attached is a drawing which shows. the limits of site along South 133rd Street. Also attached is a "Minimum Stopping Sight Distance - Wet Pavements" Table (reference also attached) which shows a minimum site distance of 200 feet for a speed of 30 miles per hour and 275 feet for a speed of 40 miles per hour. South 133rd Street has a suggested maximum design speed of 35 miles per hour. The drawing shows a site distance of 463 feet which exceeds the minimum site distance required. • •■••, • ' . • ..;.;'• . • -...-: 737 - - - 174 CURVE PROBLEMS IN HIGHWAyi4ESIGN . ) 1— z uJ w 2 w 0 z 1- 1. (.9 c7i . z a. or cn , D CO ZI tO • • equals mass times dece F=Ma=—a g If the coefficient o F = W f; hence, a =J velocity u to rest is v: 32.2 ft per s2, and sp distance in feet reduce • 2 = —30f • Actually the coeffi assuming it to be so value is assumed to fi The coefficients of frit are free of mud, snow, In Table 8-1, des highways with full con be slightly less than 1 traveling at yet lower design speed were used (almost double the ta would be somewhat te the critical design yak Theoretically, sto the percent-grade divi = vi 30 (f ± G) In practice the si upgrades, a fact that distances on downgri one-way lanes on divi roadways. 8-5. Passing Sight D In the "Blue Book" tht is the sum of four distz d, = distance traN traveled dur acceleration SIGHT DISTANCE . - - ••••• kr) 4/1 . • CD CD osi un CD un CD CD vn CD r- vn r, un CD r- vn rq en 71- vl v, VD r- $ se) r- --. en CA —'00 CD r-- --, so '.0 0'. (fl CD vD cr V:, u'D r • .c. Oa Z .--.. •-■ 0 0 .,„ --, en --, 00 CD V) r■ el VD on CD CD on 00 cr CD — csi on en on cr cen - ,....„ uO en ci . , • • en — CD CD ON CO r- el en on el f4.C4 C4 ci ci c; c; O ci ci PERCEPTION PLUS REACTION TIME DIST. (s) (ft) . C) en CD — un c‘i r4 -- -- el el cr un Ms./DC:NO .— C.4 el -- --, — CA Csl eV e4 un un vn tin un un un csi CV csi csi esi CV (V „ :-i w Z " E 1 - - : .'.:a cn a ct. oo osi • ‘.o er ri wl 00 •—• 'cr en NI. vn un un '.0 vO . z - 0 it _..-:. ,... 0. ■-1 , , CD on CD CD CD un CD un CO r v,-, vo vO r- r- oo • equals mass times dece F=Ma=—a g If the coefficient o F = W f; hence, a =J velocity u to rest is v: 32.2 ft per s2, and sp distance in feet reduce • 2 = —30f • Actually the coeffi assuming it to be so value is assumed to fi The coefficients of frit are free of mud, snow, In Table 8-1, des highways with full con be slightly less than 1 traveling at yet lower design speed were used (almost double the ta would be somewhat te the critical design yak Theoretically, sto the percent-grade divi = vi 30 (f ± G) In practice the si upgrades, a fact that distances on downgri one-way lanes on divi roadways. 8-5. Passing Sight D In the "Blue Book" tht is the sum of four distz d, = distance traN traveled dur acceleration n, °ollution Control, Third t Edition 'ehat:ior, Second Edition n to Hydrology, Second i Edition tOUTE SURVANG AND DESIGN FIFTH EDITION CARL F. MEYER Professor Emeritus; Worcester Polytechnic Institute DAVID W. GIBSON University of Florida, Gainesville HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, New York Cambridge, Hagerstown, Philadelphia, San Francisco, London, Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Sydney 1817 • • Sponsoring Editor: Charlie Dresser Production Manager: Marion A. Palen Compositor: Syntax International Pte. Ltd. Printer and Binder: Halliday Lithograph Corporation Art Studio: J & R Technical Services, Inc. ROUTE SURVEYING AND DESIGN, Fifth Edition Copyright ©1980 by Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. • All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For informa- tion address Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 10 East 53rd Street, New York, N.Y: 10022. Libraryof Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Meyer, Carl F Route surveying and design. (Series in civil engineering) Includes index. I. Roads — Surveying. 2: Railroads — Surveying. 3. Route surveying: I. Gibson, David W., 1944 – joint author. II. Title. TE209.M48 1980 625 79 -15267 ISBN 0- 700 - 22524 -2 Conter Preface vu PART 1 BASIC 1 Chapter 1. Route Chapter 2. Simple Chapter 3. Comp( Chapter 4. Parabc Chapter 5. Spirals Chapter 6. Earth% PART II PRACT Chapter 7.. Special ;Chapter 8. Curve l TO LANCE MUELLE ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 (206) 325 -2553 C� of -i'o1Cui�I.A Pl.,a �I��la b�r�� ?L4 I� t fi r~ t Aop1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ .Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints n.EUASE OGF mQQaardonal, DATE £/a1 S•� JOB NO. ATTEN ON Ft 6 1A RE: re5rr-df2.4a. .4W-- 1:3Lr)I-6i S CD, e4. F the following items: ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I SNI1%1 fzor i 6hl-t'A1. c645q4■ At41J0441,41' 11(2-1'I Ai. SIDPIA X t.1 4grre ?LAND THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval )(For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS I�(1 AUG 2 8 198 ^'= `fit' r "' !LA PI r itTi! 5 i DEPT. COPY TO n181IW 2402 (Ar ea sJ Inc., QOM ass 01471. SIGNED: Amy If enclosures am not as noted, kindly notify us at once. July 31, 1985 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusan, Mayor Jesse Johnson Lance Mueller and Associates 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, WA 98122 Re: Fostoria Park EPIC 284 -85 Dear Mr. Johnson: 6 The City has review the Environmental Checklist submitted for this proposal and is need of the following information to be submitted in order to complete the environmental review process: /(071, 1/111 1. Hydrological_ study to determine the final grade elevation of the proposal. ojV") 2. Geotechnical study "; :c " 3. Analysis of traffic access and site distance restrictions for the proposed curb cuts. 4. Storm drainage system analysis of existing and proposed system. Please provide this information as soon as possible in order for us to expedite the threshold determination on this proposal in a timely manner to facilitate the current grading permit being reviewed. In addition, enclosed are copies of staff comments on the Environmental Checklist, which contain specific development concerns outside of the environmental review. These are included for your consideration in pre- paring the final development plans. If you have any questions, call me at 433 -1847. Sincerely %e Rick Beeler Associate Planner cc: Building Official Planning Director City Engineer Fire Marshall Crime Prevention Officer Parks & Recreation Director ^' CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM III CN 4 5)q3 EPIC ,gL/-SS FILE `iVP- ENVIRONMENTAL /REVIEW ROUTING FORM .£ yaait'I1 p /1 'LI/- TO: BLDG [j PLNG I i P.W. ( FIRE POLICE ri P & R PROJECT 51r7l Q1 12l -ki LOCATION 30. r',355nt 0, I P"` ,ie FILE NO. Via' DATE TRANSMITTED i'gS RESPONSE REQUESTED BY %��Jr"g� STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW A'ND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT (ovvinmr) DATE COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM III CN 5 )Gj EPIC ,,2'L/-5 FILE /Mg' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM • .67YOL n@ P2t/i77,if- TO: (1 BLDG [ PLNG n P.W. n FIRE 1 POLICE Q P & R PROJECT r-60 / O -' &do LOCATION .50, /,3rd' /dCi i 3"! 4 .Gti DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR eitv, FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 7,734<f- COMMENTS PREPARED C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM - •CN q5 /Q, EPIC ,,$0-55 FILE `'O/--- .byaaJ4@ P -714 TO: J BLDG [ PLNG Q P.W. n FIRE POLICE n P & R PROJECT rtolovai &do LOCATION jQ, /3 eth0, i 3 % FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 16 -g5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR , ('�if. -, THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING. THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT 14A i LOCATION OF ACCESS POINT OF ! # #ST SOUTH IS A CONCERN DUE THE THE CURVE IN THAT STREET REDUCING SIGHT LINES OF TRAFFIC FROM THE WEST APPROACHING THE SITE. WITH THIS PROJECT...AN OPPORTUNITY NOW EXISTS TO IMPROVE.. THE DEFINITION OF THE CORNER WHICH INCLUDES 133 ST., 134 PL. AND THE ON /OFF RAMP FOR SR599. 14C APPLICANT STATES 139 STALLS WILL BE GENERATED...IS THIS FOR JUST THE NEW BUILDING, THE NEW BUILDING AND'TWO PROPOSED BUILDINGS, OR THE WHOLE INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE COMPLEX AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS AND INCLUDING THE NEW BUILDINGS. 15A INCLUSION OF THIS PROJECT WITHIN THE EXISTING PATROL DISTRICT PARAMETERS WILL DATE INCREASE PATROL TIME IN THE IMMEDIATE_AREA OF THE PROJECT AND REDUCE SAME TO OTHER AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY. . „A 0r. FOR RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING BUILDING SECURITY AND LIGHTING. 7 -26 -85 PJ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROU TO: n BLDG PLNG [�[ P.W. PROJECT f6jY /a.' CN 55)gg EPIC ,;7g1/157 FILE in/P- ING FORM •(YaaJ4@ i2efmd= LOCATION jo, 1,3rdi /60, 13114&- FIRE ni POLICE ri P & R DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW A'ND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMM T /','t /i_ . 1 %= ,Jk a /L i DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 1�► CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: E[ BLDG ri PLNG P.W. 1 FIRE J POLICE [j P & R PROJECT F-05 y /L. ih,u6) LOCATION jQ, /,3�jrt /� ,, J 3 .t% �CN I15)gg EPIC ,,L/-5 FILE ki7hq- Gyact;ry FILE N0. Le//4 DATE TRANSMITTED 7'g-g5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-025-65 STAFF COORDINATOR & a RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT A "III _. • t Lt.* 1 M 1• 11:a{: 14 n C (T`I'S CNN\ P Sao $ ca P PU JZ1 ThN. P P Iva AJ rj[L 4t1rnt1 (T'1 -11,1"E 1EL PW or S .13 31z-a0 C W C3 aut. JILD s-As . W (us IN1SC' df 11,44S A1.UW4nq C 1"T 1 o►,; of CA(), L (O S OAkk a 1)W:tc S-T IAYNN S y 5-t S I >J 11r is ggik WQU l (Ur loom vt\ wit cm a.00 AcLo„„\erun 1124iA � r� �� "at p�i`l� ��M O�p�v�.� d,���1� car �\ �T1�► Ge- c. -> s7 h`i w\L L T1�. TZll \3 PAS ?NO- cf. F 11■1r & Wry r-3 1-4M-1\ STCSAV DATE /AC- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN '5-)Q EPIC ,2$L/-5- FILE 1/?/)q- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM &YQa I'I /2(,//truj- i TO: EJ BLDG ED PLNG P.W. FIRE n POLICE ri P & R PROJECT 6 Yl QJ f7u4f..) LOCATION ./U, 0 ,,,d, /co, 131 i FILE NO. `Il f /� DATE TRANSMITTED 1 g' ?5" RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-025'85 STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 7� ,.Q, .6-, 10/TM! 411".1) J) —19'11141'14 ‘1/11j4tC4ifel G•� OPAgij 9G. DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 TO LANCE MUELLER ASSOCIATES /ARCHITE TS 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 (206) 325 -2553 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints LC TT. OF UMRSE 0T TL L DATE J J // ■ 4 /$ ATTE 1 RE roosro i ht f'° 12-tG- JOB NO. ❑ Plans the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 ?AAte 2z or c `c re-us-r 2 J)'tL% or y'6-rg ?L ti THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO PRODUCT 240-2 f J Inc, fygm, Vass. 01471. SIGNED: 0 enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. LANCE MUELLER ASSOCIATES /ARCHITE S 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 (206) 325 -2553 TO e F -r-ot‹ V LA an? OF� JUL 11 1985 BUILDING DEM WE ARE SENDING YbU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order rum. of TURSrdromm. DATE '7I l/ 86 DATE JOB NO. ATTEN ION RE 1 4:4-(,n Les "pug ,s"4 "F'' eNWi R.ci.1 r4\e 1. 6%4, gey Lt' T ❑ Plans ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 eNWi R.ci.1 r4\e 1. 6%4, gey Lt' T 1 'iIA, * CAP-APilg CAP—AP A pt -r-1bP . _2 b..)—e —s, ) — 1 bo °= L - 3e) - • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval )g(For your use ❑ As requested )For review an. e '7if ❑ F• =IDS DUE 19 REMAR ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ RINT NED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO -ft PRODUCT 2142 (N/ Inc, Groton, Mm 01471. SIGNED: 0 enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. F Z.61,1"t4Ag.j MITE PI-AfJ 7 architects ale 120 IH.ae. • ...ft le weal, .r.a•aoe 3S5 anew r oro w e21111,D0J6r4 -17, '5 4.r. fOeirOrslA PARK TJKVIJLA, wA. rooTALIA K A4 04.1Are* AftLe NA lob no. r.viemn e•e• • '"/•;...':.i.'•'",,•'.1‘!•,/ 1;;• met „ • • . I • 1, • I $iftt,.1•; 0.:*1 . I ; ,, !.. • t ' -44 7.! ' . 4-, ' • • I E I ' O. . 40 • • ;.• -11,1 ; • I 't • .• .111. •• I • I; i ■-• - • -.' . ! ' •,Il :`, l'..' 1** . I.. II, ,. „•;•'... . „ . i.;r•:';', • , .,•.• '1 ' -, .1, .. 1 i, -112.,1, ..; 1,;,, ; : . ••• I. !•i •ii: ', .' '1! ,..I.;.1;• .,,It.. ,'-1',,,. ,. r,,",;., 1 . ; .4 11,.; `,-; li,'.' ,! 1.!';'N'1,!... L 091 •ooZ'r' m `_E' --- Sp �ll'r� —7 0 �: 0 G t it 1C e U) I• )k V .6C--''o+��`0``- ‘C-1,1 a- /bvlyl 1J y __ ........ ... • . • WNW .: s`_. ev_ =7 31yrJOdt03 d7IM%�nl SO�- 51141 gC i_.'.....:_:..,/,____,, CGS_ 7/7� Aid, ¢, B / I'LL- p� __ '3 oN ids -go. ; , __._�- �1, j oN �. 1 cN N� r U 7 r-:-.71-- - j �l pS ! '` 11, ADC _t f ;L6 665 \ ,, 11 r� \P Jog at 1� � S__ 21 \` i''�6zt)` I 6Z-I Oro 3 5{So�LN u r_ •pasrnay '998/ dnJy,JO /; 01V Lrcti_fad CRETIN, IOIE41 1. ' ALL 07361RILTIM 961 -E III II®WICE 1016 •STAMM • 5••1¢X0671106 F01 ANIMAL MIX IONS ®61R0TIDI• - • PEPPED BY 5554161155 STATE MITER 154110016 PUBLIC 1000 . ASSIXIATICA, 010010 EDITION (1061) AID CITY 6 T1A01LA 'STRUMS SVITTI01TI06. 2. 155E CDETRACTW D SOLELY RElE< EN it F55 DE PEAR, 1571015 AID SEMMES 0 Ca161RLT7131 A6 FP TIE SUETY 6 100016 . AN) OTTERS 55 754E 0361RLTI01 SITE. 3. IT DOLL E TIE 5091RACT41'S RESANSISD.ITT ID 411107 OIL ' • ACE A L UTILITIES NE M 51RCTLIES METIER 9011 9054 ON WE PLACE 9061 55 7105 PLAY. DAME 0E TO UOTIU CT0I 5 MEMO SMALL BE REFA ED AT 1M 0011ACi0rS E19 . _ 4. PaVIDE AID RATIGA6 TUMMY i711E11 FAB= SILT FEIN TO 11191E SADDER LADEN RATER 012! 6T TEASE TIE PROJECT SOT..'.. TIE FACILITIES ROT E DI OERATIOI PRIM 10 O.ARD6 OR VIER mT6TRCTI06 ODE MIET6DED INSTIL O NSTRCTIDI AID UCC6GPl6 ARE WARRED AID MERLE. FOX 55 -5111. EROSION 615 PAWED. AS 076T9CRON PPS AM EXPECTED • (SEASONAL) CONDITTONS DICTATE. NDE SILTATION CORM. FADLITIES MT E RESIDED TO DESIRE OFLETE SILTATIIR OrR. 55 DE POESOSED WO7ECT. REWIRE. E. 0RDS TIE COA TE •0 (INSTRUCTION, IT 961 E 1101 m1.10I55 IRO RESPO®DITT 6 TIE ROUSER TO'AMOS AO WV m0ITID8 IRO MY E SEATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES 440 TO mono( N1WTI55R FACILITIES, 05531 NO AB01E. 141IDN0 REDUIEPENTS. '65 RAT E NEEDED TO POIEC1 NDAORR B. 'ml 070N NADI PIPE 5141 BE 12D01E1E RIMER 069E7ED AMMR. . C-14 -2 01 4410 C-75-11 W 6 GI.. GILVARIZED STEM 0) 16 G. ALMA N3161- 0761116T al PETAL P1TE. STEEL ON AL11ml1 PPE ' 610411545E 11AIERTI0O'0)6FLTING SPIVS 03561PRIG 10 .715. IE5IDE1ER7$ IF APNO)SACCEFICATID6 SECTION 90-]O2112. STEEL PM 955.1. REOGIVE -19EA1EER1 1 ASPHALT 001716' =OE B. -. =I6 - 655 RIGID PIP ICRIC ETE OI DON) DOLL E 0.655 "e' PER *8 5TROM P IN)I6. 62 (PEA MVO. RO1 A DOES 5155 PIPE TO SINGLING). MODS FIR "'REX500.0' PIPE (0700A1T0 PET L 55 RAVE) WALL E CUSS •• PER PPM 57115545 RAN 60. @ (AEA MAVTI 609 4 DOES E10P PIE TO 5 DOES ABAE PIPE). O5101 ROTH 901.1 E 'AD 110E5 610614 .55 1 -1/2 IDES. FDE 01AIETER PLUS 16 DOES. ACC/EVER 73 GREATER. 6101(1. SHILL ' E PLACED DI 6 1601 - 10. 5. ALL TYPE I 06101 SUDO 9041 E PER ZVI STANDARD RAN W. 52 61)4 /PRA TYPE BOA OWLET - TRAP -AO IPA 50446 D RIP , 6. AS RUSE ND 0011. ALL TYPE II CATCH DASDS MALL E PER AP54 STUMM PLO 6. 55 10111 APA STAMA O MN/ 10. A2 ERNE A6 COWS. ALL REQUIRED 5090 *01ER REEYRON/IETFRTIDN 6401111103 5587, E IDBIRCIED A6 11 OERATI3 ROOD TO PARIS AD 001.016 O R0TRCCION 05155 000OO5E APPROVED O TIE R70W1EO 6 • . -R10S 6006. .. 7. TIE BRIM. 9ALL E PLACED EQUALLY ON EOM 6755 6 TE PIPE I6 LAYERS KITH A LOOSE VER E RPM 6 513 DOES, M1601 OPT0 RENT 14002, 110001T TAMPING EACH LATER.' ': 1155E COPACTED LAYERS 98T 010)06 F55'0E 148E DIAEIER .ON EACH ELIE OF TE PIPE ON TO 515 O TIE TEN55. *17010116 TO OWLET( DE 'FILL OVER PIPE. SWILL E 755E 591 44; EXCAVATED MR THE 1R001 EXCEPT TAT 550154500 '.MTEROL, FROZEN LOPS, 55 ROCS 55 PAYOUT CHINKS IRE . TA6 510 .DOES IN MONA 0151!6155, ON ODOR 1.150I190.2 MT00NS • _ • E2TRCED 015.9RLL E BOOED TO TIE ASPHALT SURFACE 1016 A5 DRY BORIC ALERT =TABLE FIR THAT PIIODE. IL= -.4e, 41 REIWI AT 6'-0° 0.C. DI 61 AREAS. VIER THE 10015, 1411E UL6TRLLTINI 0915615 TE ROOM 6 507, EIC.,11105E MEM 91151 E 10.63 -SEEDED E16 RTE CRASS FIR TE REENTIC0 601 ,511E EROSION. - . • '12. ALL PEE' 9541E LAID 41 A PROPERLY REPNOD F5IDATIDO ACCORDING TO 1061DIGTEI XATE SPEC 7-02.3(1). .71015 9911 MADE E655ARY (064 .D 6 TIE TROD/ 55TIOM DI DE 'TOP .. 6 701 621DAT755 . RATE416. AS TELL • LS RACEFIDO AID • OPACTIDY OF REQUIRED EDDIM MIERU/ TO UNIF001 TARE 50:. . -' 1447 tE ERIK LFJGTM 100TE PIPE KILL E SPRINTED . a A INITCFLT EASE 55)T1O BASE. IT 715 16111E PAT A- IA TIE 411705 6 lE TREIOI 01ET5 TE RDIQEPENTS FIR 'VIM BAWD.. FON DE PIPE EADODC1 TIE FIRST LIFT 6 PIPE . EOOI6 ' MT E OEL1IID PRIMED 11E ARTERIAL IN TIE • BOTT01 '.. IF DE TEPO( I5 1505.55.. E9AAOED AND CCAPACTED TO.FO14 A OEM 1►ODIDDC RAE. " t. •. - - '13.' STRICTURES 961 611 E %ROTTED 101103 10.00 FEET 6 TIE '.. SPRDL . 11NE- OF ANY 57001 EROIRAE PIPE(3). 6 .15.41 FEET OEM THE T6 6- AO t6. 755E 5TOR DRAM= STD* MALL E CONSTRUCTED -01160116 TO TIC APPROVED 14.09 165004 101 6 FILE IN M' EPARTMNT" 6' WBLIC. KM. AO DEVIATION F101. TIE APPROVED PLANS 1011 • :.. RESIDE" 1RITIEN APPROVAL [701 TIE POPLR A030T, 00ENLT . TIE QTY IF IMOLA DEPARIER OF POEIC 4005. . 15 A COPY E TIER APPROVED PLANS ROT E EA RE :141 521E VENDER 4116TRC1ID11 I5 b P.O0E55. ,.5... M2.. iL «MVwe.l..1. .n. y I1w AA A AAA a 1 •.,.S 151A ,...I.u.L.. a•,/. . TV.,. J •4114 plea •..l s••• Aet w..•......t..F AA. %AAA .n•.• 1 .1••1.*l.. Iw...A co. 6(10) a 5(11). - .. .. • • .•'T.. 1..14 ........1 f ...A ... •S,PI. i3, - EA.:.y.r .0...1 .40 AA ..64d .. Nnw 5•...0 .*.•w•. ZS L.F. (o.a) • 324' A /.Kx' merit Concrete Combined Walk, Curb, Curb & Gutter.. Cfl °2, TYPE TOP /7.81Z /N/. M8Z • 15.' ALL - 55115554E STRLi1EES MT ON RELIC 001041-0-01175 SHILL • 1545E 1.15, 50ID 1S266 LIDS UNLESS ODERIELSE 0114111ED BY 'DE OPARf1E4T 6 R01t IOCa.: . - :17.. ILL -RIOT 0086 00 FMTI150 CRAMS SW41 E TIOLRDED TO •1IE 5TOU ONIRAR SISTER. 16. '61/DIARY 551'1 PM. ROLL E C7.OETE.CDIFDOm6 ID 65711 2- 1AF1 RAIN COMTE CR ASIR C-76 F1A E0 2110D- CONCRETE ' (TYPE IV KIL), 6 CLAY CSFOmC ID ASIR 1-E5 (EXTRA STRENGTH) 31/DITS'991L E RBEA 10114 SPECIFIC TYRE m MUD ID E APPROVED D1 IRITDIG 6T 16E.QIT E611EFD PRIER TO OE, MC PIPE 95411 Minn! 150114 111 POO1 Sml6 6 6515 05111 56 S. 19. RACER LINES ROLL'- O AOSOAIQ 101711 TIE. CITY OF TU(IIDA' • 9>QDI06TIOI15. • SMARM SMALL BE C06TRL1m O ACLVO6Q 10 1155 CITY 6 1110011 57AIO= SPECIFICATIONS. • - .SCALE 424.••4 755 F2 TOP 21.7 /NV /s.7 • zr7LF (NO) 30' A6.I6 75. R AN 12.3 C.B' /, St!. TOP 20.50 ' AvV 12.59 STORM WATER SYSTEM .. SCaL6 So • N• 1• L LL i WIDE 1. .-I± 1cPk1wAY 1 . • {rbPOFBgRM .) - I C� 4,NTTRA - -G MM4!'FC 5u (NVN4"FACC) .FACE ���OF SEDIMENTATION POND PI I E. E.* ae,v /S.v /E / / /n ///8 /P5.T - SECTION "" d/- /// -POND SPILLWAY • a . RN, -RAP Low -606-6. OF' • Posit, C Cass/.! LENOM ) FOR oveRFLOw To Ex. OITCN.- nt4' - 0141sT,• GRAPE 604 - �;� � ALTERNATE Z GENERAL' NOTES • • ✓0W75 A.A. • d.' .C•M SAM% 11.01. ny le. ^�l/✓ /N MATERIALS : SAO // .A./ A61O4NA •Nion*. .• COMT.OE7E : 5 .1/be CAN, a(W)o. a(1)• • •P110C6(KoWS:ISAKAYAAAr.,.A. yealCAA 1a-i.�+.c.nt...' NthaPeNvir: Fr 4-' o9s.r ANwrAAO✓ wai +M#C.d. , OTTOM OF POND' SE-a770 i A -4,. <1 /p - 20 L'F. b•_ /," 6" 0.A,.// -� QQ Erx /o war TAP • "• L�\ wtE ' L e l - VALVE /^ /• • STANDARD PLAN NO. 10 • Cement Concrete . •Driveway, - :Type •D• .. I," ,z)„. POND "SPILLwAJ 24 >� (se E: DETAIL) • TEMPORARY SED/MENTATioN PonID 5X/$7/5401 /O' WATER /54/54 /7-A,P1/ e r /AREA N 5541. NEED TO�T/ONS • F/ELO 2+XE� Ec.EVAT /DNS a�,WA7ER \ \� AAV RR R To AN✓ ST/2.1A0 AND NOT/ \\VNN\ /22 \F/ELo VERIFr PRIOR To CONSTRUCT /ON p • - CONTRACTOR NOTE !!\ PoSS /BCE Cow:tier BET EM USN - ao -STa .4 1 .4/.//7 wAT AT R'•' oar - 771 /2.LOCATION. F/6LD LW /£ - ELEVATION OF WATER - \. COT 3.54'0 PR/cse To ANV cYa+ /STN TOP 23.20 ,., /D NOT /FY OwN6R /NV. I6.ZZ SCALE : :°= 50 567 • / L VIC /NIT Y MAP' / "= 2560' Seo1MEA/TAT/ow) PoND • - 4,291.0 CF, CAR . 80TTOr•1 PNMBNS1ONS - 15' x 5 O• BOTTOM ELEVATION - IS g- • ' PIC PLUS 2 P A MET= STEEL STEWS e d.2.LL /t' !OJ- !,7575 n Gam., . .. n.NS -a' � CONS CLEAN; Our 79P 7D ORACLE AO. /.;n . • RIP -RAP ... • MEAD WALL. / LET. . / 1S t Been/ G44TTER eT P PR R AND PAN h AI 2544V.RB, cr00 /Z446w L%i'DOR. 40750 N•rR. MOTOR. ENT. c Ib 'l1e.rov 25. 7I S. /33 �.l� ww c 6ARFw AD ST. CORE 4 0114 -1014 yy3e•DR.VE�•.Y '� 6IE AIL TN/3 5427 Kati (ILTtP PA Ex. SANITARY SEMRR RIP'. /3.51. Avv, Bq_ W /Nair • ![ sro. /VAN ••147 APWA TDP� D. `/•74TON GRADE. W /'° -13- so z%M'N. • me Tit HIM . . SECTION 13.5 ST Fib BEY2222 1 PIECE PC MOO T11 ALL re MC ENCASE SEND DI W,ILSlU . _ /N$/DE OR of+ Mammas - AO SCALE CROS5 /NG c"'SS. /NV. a /8.7o -. 30' 5-D, /NV.. /S. 5/ 5x • - • NITARVSEw6R. " TOP. /9.96' .. /NV. 1/.7( /0".) • /NV. /4.0 C L") . DROP /.1,4A/ NOL6 ESC 11613/1 /Bove' •. /7.45 2271` . ENO NEW CURB, GUTTER SOGF - IB`O•+R - SIDEWALK. SEE PROM /76075 44% SITE PLAN awe DR /VE WAY - LOCATION. 'CALL 48 HOURS. BEFORE:YOU DIG • BUSH, ROED.& HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS &.LAND SURVEYORS.' , ': SEATTLE. WASHINGTON x1""=•5e . *1614 9 -.85.1 S. w 1 85/84.` • 0 C 0 C a 0 3 .6 m 0 m L 0 N Y � m • • GEERAL 1R61 1. ALL 03I61T1C1113 9RLL E IN IC@BIRE ■0TH *STANDARD . SPFLIFIGTI06 iR AI■OCPAL P1..10 MRS 031611617ID0I PREPARED BY YR5101LT01 STATE WRIER NEW' RELIC -1003 A551CIATDN. OAEST COITION (NW) YO Q11 3 T00mA • 2. ..TIE OWTRACTOI IS 541317 1ES OLE_ FR THE MAW. 1311 ANNA SEROCES 17 ®6TIVETION ANNA FR THE BUTT OF EWERS ND UD06 BB 1)• 7161WC0ID1 SIRE.. 3. IT WILL E 1(13 IOCTR'S NESOI6IBD.IT7 ID ROIECT 'D1- RAE ALL 1ODITIEB 555/M S1RLL10E5' NETHER 905 R 'ION 9ON ON TIM RA*. ON3AE RE TD mITWOTR'S OE505115 SHALL E REWIRED AT 11E 71T**C115 S E04ff... 4. 'ROVICE ACM 13511101 TIPPERARY FILTH FABRIC 151 FOAM TO DELHI 9DDEBr LW 0TH L■ES 131 LEAVE THE PRRECF - THE FAC11 **1L5 R67 II 11 RERATION MOIR TO D.EN03G R BIER 116TRLETIR NO E OIJITADED VEIL ONISTRWTD311 4* WOSOPIIG AE mRE1FD AID POTENTIAL FR 01-5ITE EROSION 4b PASSED. AS .61616LTI01. PROMISES ND EXPECI15 (5EA5OR) 7NII HIES DICTATE, ROE SILTATION CONTEL FACILITIES MT E REDID TO DOME =ALETE. SILTATION :.` . 7114L . R DE 100051 RW1EC1. . TIEEFO¢. OR= TM CORE IF =main, II MOLL ff lE - crass T3ON *13 E5o06IDRTT1' R 113- EVELOA TO 616055 AO 8(]R'. COMM 1 4T 011 E RETIE BY 161. ACTIVITIES NO TD . ROME NOIT1OIIL FACILITIES, DER AND OOZE WERE EOIDOEJRS. AS . MT E EEVD ID .PROTECT A7Nfl3T 4444 PPOPERTIES. - - - 5. - ILL :THE I C41R anus 9OL'E PER IIPS1•STNORD RAN W. 52 . WU AMA 1113E RA O TLET TRIP A10 ARP ST*1NNN. RAN NO. 48 FRA C NO MAIL 111 11•E II 011134 905710. SWILL PER IPA STAMEN FUN 16. 55 WIN IPWA STANDARD RAN 10. 42 FPAr 4611 e11FR- . 6. ALL REQUIRED 5706 INTER REDURI3VE1ENTIDM FACILITIES RST . • RE 71610.17 AND IA [AERATION RIIR 10 PADRE All) OD1N1G 0I611C71m1 IUF55 051060E APPROVED R DE WARMED OF 7. 'TIE- 68100111 MILL E R. 5 -00a1• ON EOM SIDES R i113 - PIPE -. IN LAYERS WITH A L. AVERII* EPR CF 5IA . DOES, ` 01X6 EP1)4 LIGHT DOES, ' TEI ONLY TP4'1* EAR LACER. DESE NPACTVD LA135 R61 EIT1O FR EE PIPE. 711E ER ON • • EACH SIE OF TIE PIPE R TO 51E R DE TRENT. 01E5I419 .. TD'. 71131E Elf FILL 01ER PIPE 9111 E DE BEE AS .EXCAVATED FIO3 DE TEEO4 EXCEPT 1145 Rfd*IC OTERI*L. .. FE DEX UWS. R FE05 R PAVEIENT 0016 AOE 'THAN AC WOES ION *01141 0I1FJ6I01. R ODEON LNI4IITABLE .137830.5 :,9V1110i ff HAD. _ - • B. • 4/1 5106 IMAM PIE sal. e• t910E1E R EBER GASAE7ED ASTR' 414-2 R ASIA C-76-05 01 16 08. DICVRI® 5110. CR 16 0*. 4541014 113-MIL 1D3N13ATED IETIL PIPE. 57EM R 132IQ4 4 PIPE 9041 HAVE OTERIIOII OMECTI• 0035 mPIFINDG TO 113E 416113 Q: IOW IPECCIPIGTIOS =TIM 60.3021.7. STEEL PM 9111 RECEIVE TREATIEIR 1 MALT MOM : WIDE AND OO54E. 01 ETTR. BEm1/0 FR RIGID PIPE (78( RE1E'R 3101) SRAM E CLASS -811 co IPA 515134I10 RJR W. @ (RCA NOVEL F034 4 DOES ELo, PIPE TD MRDWDf). 'MODE FR' FIDDLE PIPE (CDgZR1ED FETAL R 0.05701) ROLL FE MASS 1• MB IPA SWORD RAE W. 62 (PEA PBAVEL. FD03 4 DOES mat PM 10. 6 DOES AB6E PIPE). • 1113101 WD7H SHALL E 40.' DOES IOAIR4 R 1 -1/2 TOES PIPE OIINEDER ' RJ6 IB DOES, ROEMER E GREATER. 640/111 BULL E RACED IN 6 DO1.. . ' : -units 71VACIED TO MS ALAI DE4 toarn., 10. EATw1ED DIN SHALL E BONED TO 11E ASAOLT 9RnE.IQ1M'IL5,' EPDXY 100510 WOO 9IITA.F 001 THAT 1FPOSE. RHO: ir. 11. Dual AREAS, MEN omit 1345. 1EOE 71sf11113 ((010615 THE FE7VAL O 90, ETC..' DOSE AREAS 911 E 540145E7ED • 12. ALL PIPE.. SIWI ff LAID OI A' PRIVILY • ROMPED FORWARD' 'A[7DN1* TO NASIIIIGTOi Si ATE SRS 7$.3(1). • 1105 SHALL MAW imam IEVELDG R 7113 1o01 RTMWR DE TR. E 'THE FOAOATIR 01044. AS 1FC1 AS R CEMIFT -50 [IMPACTION R REQUIRED B¢O16 WE10AL TO 003081 RAE SO ._ .:•41007- TIE ENTIE.LOGR MI DE PIPE Im1 E swam - R A L■03RE1 CEOY Rn3i10D1: BASE. 5..51E NATIVE 01ERIAL.1M '1E 101113 R TE- 1EA01EFTS DE- EMIRDE1T5' FR -RAVEL BAOTILL FR THE PION E7I/16- 11E FIRST . LIFT ' R PIPE 9DODG . 05 E RETIED PROVIDED 1113 011334. IN DE ' 133710 CF TIE TWICE I5 =OED..REMAED AIO COPPC1ED TO FOR 13. STRLTOES $NHL 101E 14@0717 lanai 10.0E FEET 13 1E ' mom LITE OF WY 8706 1UTAE PIPE(5). R 15.0D FEET 14. 1E 5706 RA11WF S757Pt WALL E 03151RLETED 150:RNIIG -T0 TE IPPROED RAW 1®1 WE ON FILE IN 113 44(81 EIT 6 RELIC MKS. ' ARR DEVIATION MO THE WARMED 8115. 11.1 EIRE IRIT1EN IPM WL FRON TIE RIOEA =cc. • DA ENTLI 15 A ®1 OF DESE ',soma) RATS MST E (4 TM 30B SITE • NEEER 716TWCTIDN I5 55 MEWED .1:..', wl%i yr ■••I• .:. rw .. 6 Py�..,,y..4. ..I(r.4.r �... ay..4 ,; «...1....... eV. T4.4 J..nt. .\.114.4...4 - /.u1N 4 444 Eq......' !+ umt .1..11 r.11i, .a.w....l..i tl... GL•1TAaM ti <...w1...c..A c6.. *(154)' 4. )74) I.n...,I,..d town .u1 I... ...11... ..4*.. 1#...i • • I..: . STANDARD PLAN N0.15 Cement Concrete: C Combined Walk; Curb, Curb.& Gutter - TOP /7.84 - .. /8(v. MBE All RUDE 51WL71tE3 101 OR. KWIC RIGHT-M-1535 901-: HAVE MAIL 50.IDL0RDG LIDS (14.055 0111320ff APPROVED BY 17. ALL REF ' DRUM 'AN/ F130T114 CRAWS 9131' 51 TI7141). 'T SNII1A81 - WIEI PIPE 9101 E =CRETE CO F01m6 TD *5111 4 - 14001 MIN EMERITI R A51R 478 FOR REINFORCED COGiETE (T1PE 3V ' NIX.), 04 CLAY 7NiWRG TO AST I 441 ((1(186 STREWTH) 3M015'96LL . E RISER 1078 SPEC= THE R RAID T1 E APPROVED DI WITTING BT DE [ITT 1361EER EMIR 10 1613. . PVC PDE WILL 7506 1078 THE P OVI5I06 R 15111 03034 SORE . . •1• LIES SWILL E 02) ACCORLINCE WITH lE QT lF loam.* :. ' SPE$IG1I06. - . 4. SICENAL0 ' ROLL ff 3 STRLETm I1 =MOP= TO DE CITY 6 -SCALE i sSO ,,'' .. /54- *-cox • 11317T4 • 811► C,B. 4 77-.A0X . TOP 24.7 1.414 /9.7 • \ - ZL'LF (OL) 30' a /. /6. R ES L:.R(O- o- :jcr /1. t2,3 m.0 -/, 540 J4 4K" : TOP 20.50 _ i4. -i•4. NV. 12.59 • (11 6 1,0 c3. TEN* 23.20 /.vv.. 15.213 'STORM WATER SPSTEH • $ l S' w,PE IS /ILLWAK 'rbPoP8eR57 ' . -� '585. Rocs. L IJATBR .A 0„V,i A;•FACd) SuRFA,C6 p)7� oF- SED/NSNTA1ION PoND N7: tl/GA/l //CN`E!% /// /!6 /AP 5 E4710,,/ _ POND SPILLWAY 0 N.1 :5. GW 6515 ' 0c - 60.001 E RIP -RAP Lbw fi06i.OF - PoND (FU4. LemOrK ) FOR Ove1FLOw TO E¢. • 011604. • SECT /On( A1/4-A- P 1• 4204 406. ti‘ AL MATE z GENERAL NOTES -.. ✓55571 : . e+. .c..s S.5-A, /4><s/Ary.•I Avy t. t- ns-°yio..t ...we is [lea. sad OS. r MATEA44L8 SAO // m..t 0...-1.enekans. Cowclrcre .:' Gm,/ a c/ ss 60)5'5 ?'(fl' - GOOGIO 65:/Lwc,/✓siy,! h ya ✓C..+'A,p.yt�FsAr.c . NL'AY*PEAYL.'T: I. -064 oei.ar.y M.t..o.Ake! /6.i:✓s.b wciiy 61.7054 OF 508(0 . \\ �.;- ITA10AR0 PLAN NO.10 . Cernent Concrete .. Driveway. Type -D 7 "$ N N \r WWI TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION: POND / j. • � V • frx5S wee TAP • 6 1 E. • 4 E P•l. VALVE ( \✓ CON TRp@TO4 10TE/ ENSrwb ro- .4.47131 ,440,./ . �A0- A0PLIACT AREA MAO. ,, \NEED 751 @ETD E F/'.O . ELEVAT/ON5 O wATER A PR R' TO AN✓ - ., \\ ' . rum w 575 aw, NOT / 'FIELD vSRsor' PRIOR TO '' •MCW.STRucr/oN ER SCALE I`= 50 / • V /C /N /TY MAP' /_5 2560' • ti P SMDIMENTdT4ow3.FbND .'4.291.0 CF CAR. $OTTOM DI5468(SIDT•IS -15' 11 5 O • • $071054 51(74/PTION -15 i \ ' • \ / I -CLEAlb N O6AUA TOP T D61 • A /71..-9A9 recap CONTRACTOR NOTE!! POSSIBLE COVFiKT BET E 3o- .17514/9 Ana; so- ./AT AT TN /5 LOCATNA/, .4141.D CA, X EGEVAT /a8( au WATER • PA/002 ro ANY C6VSTR[&CT AA/0 NOT /FY OwN6Q R/ARA Ou7F Bbu/ 6077ER er IPROI ANNA PAV OW 00*55, S/0EWAL j Z NEW I W.DOr1. 6croap W 16 1R.67 .5. LHG EAT. 140. 11r1 All ..� = • IT as7T .1T < 011 ,. r. Y.143. • 5./33 RO 5T. AU4./ c 156NW 06.58 { 51/7/118 568 oer. 5_ T4/3 T. ASSN P y�"'r (FIATCM /T7ED �.. . ex. EX. - SAN /TARP Se.VER ' . MP. /5.55 \ /N V. B.q.t. . ' eh/ miser ' use STD. /LAN °347 APwA TOP'TO MATON GRADE. •/ /S - 8 -50.O L ••(8(. • .1c .U16 T 1TY111FX181EEt 61054 rPcc tUNLS •1WW' 6EOT04 8B N: •' 4.111510 [CCU 1MEN (*.P MONTE' 0.13651 . • • 11,1110 PVC Mr..1 6016 ' /N$/DE 0190P ••/601,6 CROSS /:VG - 01 55. /NV.. /5.70. 3o- S- 0./NV.. /S. Si -. I';: Ex. .y..N.451 7DP. ITA/8 -7R6 V 513 17 44 /NV. 8(.0 44 1) . DROP MAN NOLO see D6 1*. ABOvE 2 • ` • ENO NEVI WAS ; Oa r TER SIOEWNLIC 85E ARCM /74475 SOL5 /a 4." ' st re fR[A.V'pot DRIVE WA r � 0 \*5 .:E• .. TI•LV`ILP [710.47:167( DEPT CALL 48 HOURS. BEFOREtYOU DIG. P.. 1- 800-424 -5555 . BUSH, ROED 8. HiTCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS • SEA1T1E. wAS/ONGTON - . : 3234144 88 aSO, f° cf.9-.El 5 : .W. 1 85/84-:: +.. 4 70 0 C a 0 0 m .c O N .N (pm 10 I9 m m N 19 .. }�11 a [1 iD i c. To e W c O •c • Eo • 9 p CO • COO aro4oaa�+r .< +a: �;1'• Y'.4gj "1A1^L�- n. �: 1 t:Z-a` a .r a . '.r!j• AREA: SITE CONTAINS _95,395 SQL) BEARINGS: REFER TO AND ARE 14 OF SURVEYS, ELEVATIONS: REFER TO A1 FEET 041 2.19 ACRES. SEE. UPON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED -IN B PAGE 64, UNDER RECORDI1 NO. 78081189004. ARE BASED UPON USC AND GS Et•EVATION DATUM. Gli I CA1CU enc1N TGP441 9' •14i9 444. 1 1E SOuT N TPp LL. . S4 WA•(GR SuRL0AA 1...<v ■P T,ME'OC LIRCO, • 5.1zv aT , e +4 • es NV s10 -uL • VcoutSor•airascr rA. Pia ToR657R /a7,0• • CATGM B4vV ` TOP • 4.1.0 1.4y :49.1 • 6A 6JAS141N(atOL1 eJAfUQ(1� VAS vAUI_T TE DISTANCE PLAN PRINTED • SCALE h= 30' .':. SEP ,9 685 85/8¢ 9 -9 -85 _a— ``s:il.�'�;•_2`i ic: Y:::: ?"_.'.'fu:, :: a.i:•ti:: ,- m"t- ..rtc.:s:�::4+n.��:e:, ._.- s= ls:.a,?,:J ...��.w.�'c,�n_l,.:r:.:,nr.• ••A1 AJ 5''' 1•: 30'. • 8.26 ; • ,65 85157 WIC «,r ?ter' r.rF_n. cl fr „0N'rA1Ns vi.,v" .0 bEArI NGS: PEI'EP '1 . AN3 14 ,)F SURVFYi. f.LF.VAf1Uti_- •E: E'rr CO A ARE. 1) r ;Pr)V US::`AND� "C.54.' 61 :Ep;Gi38s C.1, Tt': -NILA ,110 DEPT rvEe treS M .. SOUTH O/pSut,Jc. Ow.r AIArruzr L Cap, '1hU�T _ S44 iTp0.'r SEwE0. W% WOLF ZOP• 0.. 4') 1.9') PRINTED SEP -91985 5ITE D /STANCE PLAN SCALE 11-3d IA 4 J • 1• 30'. 54P 826.85 L^ • ssw .4.,a..wu.sr.. eaves.«_.,...., ta:... ewa:.. l,.:. c�..: .,:rra>a:.;.w= aaac.:..:::::..�. • • "�717;7c) rR U c. Lys L j ? IL , ,1 I BUSH, ROED 8 NFTCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS g LAND SURVEYORS - PARK BLb. 4 wAt.ew • ■eeocu..ee. !.w lance mueller & associates architects aia .130 lakeside aeattle wash. 98922•206 326 2583 lob no- J. fio. drawn oheoked 7A3/j4 date - no. revision date