The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-288-85 - FIRST WESTERN DEVELOPMENT - TUKWILA II BUILDINGS (WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY / STRANDER BOULEVARD)TUKWILA II SITE PLAN REVISIONS WEST VALLEY HWY & STRANDER BLVD INTERSECTION EPIC 288 -85 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 November 22, 1985 Mr. Brad Collins, Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: t 198 }S I, r IN i' t r17 DT Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of four buildings proposed by First Western Development of Washington. We have reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments: The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. Print maps should indicate the location of the ordinary high water in relation to the proposed building. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Linda Rankin of our Shorelands Division at (206) 459 -6763. BJR:pk cc: Linda Rankin Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section 3 WAC 197 -11 -970 CONDITIONED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Develop a total of 26,000 gross square feet in four buildings on a 76,941 square foot (1.77 ac.) parcel. Approximately 5,200 sq._ft. of building area will be in retail use while 20,800 sq. ft. would be developed as warehousing. Proponent First Western Development of Washington. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any N.W. 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23N, Range 4E; on the east side of W. Valley Hwy. Buildings addressed as 16600, 16550, 16490, and 16460 W. Valley Hwy. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -85 -288 CN 85 -184 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. LJ There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by November 19, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This DNS is issued subject to the conditions listed in Attachment A. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date i(- iv-25 • Signature 6"6 -t You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS ATTACHMENT A Conditions to the Determination of Non - Significance for "Tukwila II" 1. Left turning movements from the northern access point shall be prohibited using "Right Turn Only" signs at the exit and installing 18 inch striping with turtle backs along West Valley Highway. Striping and turtle backs may be substituted with other turning control measures with approval of the State Department of Transportation (DOT), the Tukwila Police Department, and the Tukwila Public Works Department. 2. Road Paving to DOT standards shall be installed to the property line with curb and gutters installed along the property line, outside of the right - of -way. Curb and gutters shall be to a standard approved by the Tukwila Public Works Department. 3. A storm water detention and disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Tukwila Public Works Department by November 20, 1985. At a minimum, the above system shall be characterized by the following: a) All run -off to pass through on -site oil -water separaters to be main- tained by the landowner. b) Detention system to accommodate the 10 -year storm event. (TUKII.DNS) (1B) (11/85) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Tukwila II File Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner lO �s 8S' October 1, 1985 Police Department comments on the northerly right -in, right -out accessway. Information Items 1. Pat Lowery, Tukwila Police Department, recommends that either C -curbs or turtle backs with 18" striping be installed along the roadway to prevent left turns from the northerly entrance. The placement of right turn only signs is not sufficient to permit the Police Department to cite drivers making left turns. 2. The preferred method of turning movement control is the use of turtle backs and 18" striping. This should deter at least 90% of drivers from making illegal left hand turns and will provide the legal basis for Tukwila Police officers to cite illegal turning movements. (TUK.II) ( #1B) Tukwila II File Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner October 14, 1985 Left Turn Movement Controls from Northerly Accessway Information Items In response to Police Department comments of 10/14/85, Ross Earnst recom- mends 4" reflectors with 18" striping, or whatever WSDOT has been using to designate median islands to the north on SR 181. (TUKII) ( #1B) OCfvbtrr w 9,198 Cornmercla t Ve5i'94 033ou'a-te-5 t, /9854' .16.1 w !- thWvODOj, Zv,4 qiG 3 l' Qom? : j %' $ia. 5 Re: T4davi/a, Ttvo The following comments and concerns were raised during the SEPA review of your project. They do not pertain to the environmental determination, however, it was requested that they be forwarded to you as they will need to be addressed during subsequent project reviews. BT• ing Department (Tom Hill, 433 -1849) Plann n' Department (Rick Beeler, 433 -1849) Fire Department (Doug Gibbs, 433 -1859) 1. QCCC, ' vtice 5 CLu f'DrYIQ / G tat -41 t `/o4074 Ct7e, 0. 8 a..-,of -noi- be. ecry ea a5 Sel i 6 11Cf/J 4-6 y2,i0)o61 ec/. Public Works Department (Phil Fraser, 433 -1850) Police Department (Pat Lowery, 433 -1822) Parks and Recreation Department (Don Williams, 433 -1843) If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me at 433 -1845. Sincerely, Becky L. Kent Permit Coordinator cc: • FRONTAGE AREA A i - — .r.Gowawom Gu. o451.1,4a, MIIIII a Cor. GaiC363,3ALr- re"We JIIN irriSALk 4)'•10 -dWU NPR • FRONTAGE AREA B Zilblracefiria, 1113343444 3/1' ORO Lankeri L.UPC4.• .03..JiCe4 14.11,e, LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SYMB ABV DESCRIPTION SIZE OU. COMMENT 0 ^ca. 1•000..,..., .190 aunte r...1.0 ueL.4. . 032% eV 1.1ffrerri ,••••113•14 ■•••41.• 2 04- Vie i•Mie re- KA. el 31 # P44.3... NV.. 34400. ...an f e.e ,s,..: ..... •Itr. •..... Cr ts •,..0. c.,,,...4•to.., y „k•••,, -.v........ Criol....• ref • ara ISM: •... V. Aar. NOTES 1. 111 1.■••■•• are.. ........... •mmIll• Mo. 1•11. 11611 el I looms et .111 •INN Pm. 1 MI ..... tea. Nave • ...I. IrriptiN mt. 3 NM. erwle all Ismota. ..... • eac•M M•••• .M11 P• Ma.. et 1 N.. 0.11 the to et imes t•pm ..... • All Plant Nees special. No ....... t• ...... 14 mallte et lanat.plat MN, awl" m, M ..... tee IN egt;gt"pn::11■1:4:11::1•1. "."" """ ""."' PUGET SOUND POWER • AND LIGHT CO. R.O.W. ._.__._.. 5 • . 1 .4.4.....ajart, • • r ••• " • .(•,,a48 fr•W•ve., 200 Foot Shoreline Limit • •■• ••• ••• Mi..;;;• e— /N. ...0• 111111:. ,.^77.1B 8.7.,‘"74 Ear.. NneW ... .... • '•••• • • • - .• -•..•. • fr• .••••• - ..aratonam. TuRa AWN, 11111•Mme A PAIOIT60 8/13PE • .• . . . • .•••• • ...1•3•=.3 • .-A' !•..-7'.t -- • -• ••- • - • • -f *„ WEST VALLEY ROAD ." S. R. 181 • SITE PLAN 1%-.81Y-cr PM Net M O. Aur, 2 6 1985 DEF•T. :LITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: )N g5 L1 EPIC FILE BLDG [] PLNG ( ( P.W. n FIRE ri POLICE 1 1 P & R PROJECT JLJJL)J)1 i./i; 71,06) K e-(/l '1 O%.�? LOCATION W Q 1'0, Ll, I*J "A�1 FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 04/11,1 J .. ORESPONSE REQUESTED BY /(� -11 -S5' STAFF COORDINATOR V%j� RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT P DATE (0 k..( /g ' COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 PITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM ) N EPIC FILE TO: (:=1 BLDG (i PLNG 1 1 P.W. Q FIR/EE Q POLICE ( ( P & R PROJECT TLJ JI)J)1 //1; L)00 KW I -1 c»'73 LOCATION WI) J, V0),tt '"P- fe44,0.) eu# DATE TRANSMITTED 0-L1-85- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR aril FILE NO. RESPONSE RECEIVED /0 —) 1-85" THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 4 /Uv thU /fo,MmerriL eileeens — 5117- — i /else 455 on cite -/JT o GQ,rIu' 1-e9a��i� / /fn;i-�i ccesS %Ptvu«dAq 7Zar g/ J3 * C not 62- RE�!VED BY OCR .19135 TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUR COVt�SI ater 4S (Seta v-d-e E(15s ck.s ►arced. DATE /o (i (gS COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ,ITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM DN 5 / (?L/ EPIC 23? -35" FILE TO: (l BLDG F] PLNG [ P.W. n FIRE [J POLICE [ 1 P & R PROJECT T L,1JL1,fJIl./L' TWO OW/ }-1 ir)7/s5 LOCATION W P 1119-4,411,1- — 'J -j 41a�1 DATE TRANSMITTED IC) —(1-85- (,1-8 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR Varl .W RESPONSE RECEIVED FILE NO. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT -0 S 5 MXl ICr. 1- A-MiECEI KED 'PK A1,0Th ply . �-r-� L,� 0'T 19 5 T 1 J \v-e s 1� \ �J4�f L DEPT. DATE - c (-4K cl- rr& • s 1-0 . r rp W v iavo, 6CcC2 -� • v � 4.. 04 a COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 �1,ITY OF TUKWILA__ CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL.'REV.IEW,- ROUTING -FORM • TO Q BLDG Q PLNG [ P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE n P & R PROJECT i J JJ/JJJ 1 /.fif T1i,Q LOCATION WP V DATEE',TRANSMITTE-D'° 0-4' STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED- - .; EPIC FILE "'° -.. FILE- NO. • RESPONSE` REQUESTED` BYr. • 1"85 THE ?. ATTACHED .ENVIRONMENTAL - CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW-TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL' - REGARDING THE THRESHOLD. DETERMINATION.. THE, ENVIRONMENTAL. REVIEW FILE. IS. AVAILABLE='IN,THE °: PLANNINUOEPART- MENT THROUGH THE_'ABOVE. STAFF' COORDINATOR.- COMMENTS REGARDING-THE PROJECT-YOU WISH CARRIED TO- THE PLANNING COMMISSION; BOARD OFF.AD`JUSTMENT, ANDS. =CI =TY ,COUNCIL- SHOULD. RE- MADE ON THE- ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. -- -- - - ITEM' - COMMENT ._ rw . 51=i ,� tc s A EI_VFD ? foil; PIA\ e s �!KWA a r• T iLL -}'L.S \■- W � 79 5 vEvz . Lt_ InRKS COT. *S1.--r .- C-T ct 1f1 fi11LY iz-1G� it\ ki aa -4 - qtql. cluttiA. � s -m t r ?w v t ? ;;.._.T y wrtote 7-- fFF /PrC= S'rvv }- ? . ._ -.,___ .i s'' i .. L _ I ; 11 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED -BY C.P.S. Form 11 `-'"--CITY 6F TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM J),1 V 5 I'Lj EPIC �8� -35" FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Q BLDG n PLNG n P.W. IRE n POLICE LOCATION W 1/�(�( f_ 14i 1a,AJ FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED I - 'i -„RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR V%�� ) RESPONSE RECEIVED PROJECT i .JuD!I./L' I VjO P & R 10- )1 -85- THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 4 NO the//f04fne rf /7eeir/75 — i-5aT — R E C E �Jei2se p55 Ger/Ls' 05 r? 196 %a g14, / /1 . ;74Q 4'CGe5S to &a «dn j BUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BURP aCGA 4447' .5 /trnZeI Q`o/ c-7%,, .44/ 734,/9s. c nc71- L2- COY' SI 0t- I' g -s (See crate__ B (%' &i..s q - peDsed . DATE /0 /9(g5 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 \:TY OF TUKWILA 1) PERMIT NUMBER j CONTROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: [J BLDG. 0 PLNG. Q P.W. [] FIRE C1 POLICE j/j P. & R. PROJECT ADDRESS %1Cm /4:( - iZ DATE TRANSMITTED ,(%(1# i, Ate C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR, RESPONSE RECEIVED RESPONSE REQUESTED BY - W7 Wk l PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [l PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [� PLAN APPROVED PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER / _) CONTROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: (i BLDG. Q PLNG. Q P.W. FIRE [I POLICE ❑ P. & R. PROJECT /, % X /76/(2 ADDRESS /// W4%f DATE TRANSMITTED` %/ , RESPONSE REQUESTED BY = ;`1!�/��'/G 2!''�'`.; RESPONSE RECEIVED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: "‘If E 1AUG 2 8 1985 BY TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [[ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [l /061-- PLANe.PPROVED PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 ‘'Y OF TUKWILA P CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FOR ER IT NUMBER -) CONTROL NUMBER TO: ❑ BLDG. ❑ PLNG. P.W. ❑ FIRE [] POLICE Q P. & R. PROJECT --/-E) ,6/.i// 14010 ADDRESS AM//(.� DATE TRANSMITTED bag- C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ' %`-:J%2�i (l);%/2 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ ).). 0 0 C[ O ZK)1 t Ce)W\ P S 1f / ❑ 1. Lc i ckk5w,A s (10. ❑ 1in / s-�.v-i ;w s 61)s >L ❑ -"g / w2US 1, h -- erb 1..) ki P v n ❑ I21.._L.. ' t , 17za) u i i `i'"u v o P az D F f m,-., 6 S(' ❑ (� `� ) - �►i t� A)) /)EN Q STo& DM(1) 12)61 Ew Q ❑ Q a T---sks1N---. 'PO E CC-NI (MnfeNSP.1;4K717'- T--1 Li--- ( 5.5 LI E . g-k.--1-Gok-Vi -'`.)5 0-t-T- (Crr:\"3 ) N.L'n s "Ti . .L54--Y fr5 6 O C 1-11n) l +(S i.ss 4 rc 1-Lt-L6 Lye-) D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [� PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [] PLAN APPROVED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE Ci COMMENTS PREPARED BY Off C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL ,PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM PERMIT NUMBER ) CONTROL NUMBER TO: fj BLDG. Q PLNG. 0 P.W. 0 FIRE 0 POLICE 0 P. & R. PROJECT ' ' //6/() ? ADDRESS //4)/M/%) ``C DATE TRANSMITTED 0‘0 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BYWj?rCi 'jam 2 !'' <'=^ RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Er 6),A617 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED [l PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREP C.P.S. FORM 2 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - R:C ;LNG FORM TO: Q BLDG. Q PLNG. Q P.W. Q FIRE PROJECT < ( /:' / /16'O POLICE Q P. & R. ADDRESS /�C < %✓� G��/ % ( �' /C % RESPONSE REQUESTED BY �i'r%%%: / . /r RESPONSE RECEIVED DATE TRANSMITTED /f i� f ' -/W' C�J C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ITEM 14a DUE TOABSENCE OF SITE PLAN I CANNOT COMMENT ON ACCESS POINTS OTHER THAN: A. RIGHT TURN ONLY ACCESSES ALWAYS RAISE QUESTIONS OF ENFORCEMENT B. VISIBILITY FROM NORTH (SR181 HAS TURN AT THIS POINT) RAISES CONCERNS RE: TRAFFIC ENTERING AND EXITING FROM SITE. OF PARTICULAR CONCERN IS THE SAFETY OF TRAFFIC FROM NORTH WAITING TO MAKE LEFT TURN TO Q ENTER SITE FROM SOUTHBOUND LANE. ITEM 15 THIS PROJECT COUPLED WITH THE OTHER HIGH INTENSITY TYPE BUILDING IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY MAY REQUIRE A STUDY AND CHANGE IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL CONFIGURATION. DEVELOPER SHOULD BE ADVISED TO CONTACT THE CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER FOR RECOMM ENDATIONS CONCERNING LOCKS, LIGHTING. ALARM SYSTEMS, ETC. CONTACT PAT LOWERY AT 433 -1822 Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED• Q PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q PLAN APPROVED Q PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA - PUBLIC WrIS DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW ROUTING FORM PROJECT: TUKWILA II RESUMBITTAL OF SITE PLAN LOCATION: INTFBU_RBAI AVL s, (SOUTH OF STRANDER & JUST NORTH OF NC MACHINERY) REQUESTED BY: PHIL FRASER TRANSMITTED ON: TRANSMITTED TO: PLEASE RESPOND BY: RESPONSE RECEIVED: 11/8/85 P.W. Adman 11/14/85 P.W. Sewer Dept. CD P.W. Street Dept. P.W. Water Dept. J Planning by,ildi Fire Department Police Department Recreation Dept. Other: PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PLANS AND RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS ON THE PLAN AND THIS SHE COMMENTS: PLAN CHECK DATE: PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED. • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be . prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your'proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on . different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may.ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Conti, No. Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 9g &I AU 2 8 1985 ._._...EAVIR NMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 'C DEPT. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: N/4 First Western Development of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Scott Shanks. 4230 -198th Street SM. Lynnwood. WA 98036 4. Date checklist prepared: August 2. 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Project will be constructed in a single phase beginning the summer of 1985. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None that we are aware of. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None that we are aware of. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building Permit Occupancy Permit Shoreline Master Use Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. See attachment 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Project site is located on the east side of West Valley Road and South of the Strander Boulevard intersection. Site area is 76.941 square feet. See boundary and topographic survey included with this checklist for legal description. 13. Does the proposal he within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Nn -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% slope on north end. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See Attached. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Except for the artificial fill placed on the site. the native soils are typical to those found on other sites near the Green River. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or rading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Building footing trenches will be over - excavated and backfilled with structural tin to ne im- ported from a quarry. 3' to 4' of fill will be placed .. . be limited to footing excavations. . :8 • A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so denerallv describe Yes. an approved temporary erotion control - system wilt' g. • drainage swales running into a siltation area. The outfall will be run through a filter fabric prior to leaving the site. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 85% of the site will be covered with impervious surface. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • nd install an on -site temporary erosion contro — system as described in (f) Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., • dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, and give approximate y' generally quantities 002 emissions from heavy equipment will be c eated during construction activity. Depending upon the time of year the_project is constructed, dust from grading operations may be present. This will be minimized and should not be significant. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: If grading occurs during dry weather, a dust abatement program wi a initiate°. L02 emis- sions rom eavy equipment wou e a emporary s ou . not •e signs scant as e si e gra•ing 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. the Green Green lays ac Highway to the West. • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes splehase_ describe and attach available plans. Ye . the Teen aver lies across the West valley Hlgnway and Is wkliln 200 feet of project site. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ivo. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume N of discharge. 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Ground: III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate g if known. portion o the Storm water runoff will be alllowed to drain onto the adjacent property as the underground storm water system located in the West Valley Highway is too high to access. This storm water will be col- lected in catch basins and discharged through an oil /water separator. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharge c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The topography on the northerly site will not allow access to the underground stormwater utify rocated In West Valley Highway. This portion oY the site will drain to the t Puget Sound Power and Light Co. easement area. The southerly portion will be collected and drained nto e storm water pipe located in West Valley Road. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Install on SJLe SLUT ni WO =1 4..a, 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: . Evaluation for Agency Use Only deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The on site vegetation consists of scrub grasses and and low laying ground cover. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on . or near the site. None. • Evaluation for i• Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping will be installed along West Valley Road and in the parking and drive areas as illustrated on the site plan. Landscaping will constsi of trees. sod and shrubs. All ranoscapeo areas shall have an automatic irrigation system. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eaglefngbirds) other: Robins mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Field Mice fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Introduction of new landscaped areas will provide a habitat for urban to e— T ant species of wildI te. c Evaluation for Agency Use Only Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. Building will be heated and cooled by electric fire ea pumps and furnaces. s be used in warehouse areas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Buildings will be designed in accordance with the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of _this prop If so describe. Sherwin /Williams Paint Company will locate in dne of the p ... - • .. • and retail sales of paint and paint products. some mixing of paint will occur as is typical in paint stores. 1) Describe special emergency services that__mioht be required. Standard police. : medic and f ire pro- tection. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- Metntaineciean Pr ti of %ient • b. Noise . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? No existing noise will affect the ect or proposed uses. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - • term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.Noise from construction equipment and construction-rela'e- activities will be short term. I here are no resiaentlal uses within the immediate vicinity that wlit be airecLed. There will be no project- reiatea long term noise".tm L is significant. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently undeveloped. Adjacent uses include South - concrete batch plant. North - undeveloped PSPL Co. easement. East - PSPL Co. electrical easement. West - West Valley Highway. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site.. No structures on site. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Light industry (M -1) f. What is the current cpmprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 20 to 30 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NSA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existjrIrow only those projected allowed uses and plans, if any: the M -1 Zone. • Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any p ro osed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 18' -20' High b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views obstructed dip to huilrlin0 ronatruction are not Considered significant c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if , any: Design building with compatible mass and scale to adjacent and nearby buildings. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare .a. What, type of light. or glare will the proposal produce? What t me of da d• � Xs Parking lot and bui ing lightingYw%�� in o 1 OCCUr? new sources. These levels at the ground levels shall be appTxi- mately .75 foot candles. All fixtures located along property line shall be cut -off type fixture to limit light spillage. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal ?___,___ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use cutoff type fixtures along property lines. Limit Tight level to approximately .75 foot candles at ground surface. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Jogging trail along the Green River. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. - 4 - • 13. "Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro - posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans if any. Site is accessed from State Road 181raka West Vra eyRIIgd.) The proposed site development plan intimates creating Lwu (2) access points one full movement tree other Ilmhed to right -in and right out. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NO. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the ro'ect limin t Approximately 63 on site parkPng stalls are Demg --- -- .. •-• • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak vplumes would .Dour.. Aoaroximately 300 trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Limit curb cuts to two M. Limn full moverrtern --' on to SR 181 to one [ 1) curb cut. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Increase in need for standard police,'fire and medic units. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Construct buildings to current fire codeghnn83ra'. Maintain clean and efficient operation. 16. Utilities a. Circle utiliti 1 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 ailable lkateF;):� er ewEr septic s em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Natural Gas - WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS Telephone - PARIFIr: Nf1RTHWFST RFI l • ►■ -•, a .►• Water C Sewer CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to e its decision. 1,14a• Signature: f %j,,! Date Submitted: • CDk VI�V = ?CiAL wc. �OC�IATES 4230 198th ST S. W. LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 (206) 771-2300 Attachment to City of Tukwila Environmental Impact Statement Checklist Tukwila Two August 2. 1985 BACKGROUND 11. Total project consists of four (4) single -story buildings. The two most northerly buildings as illustrated on the site development plan fall within the 200' shoreline limit and therefore are subject to the Shoreline Master User Permit process. The southerly two buildings are outside the 200' line and are not subject to the Shoreline Master Use Permit process. The site area is approximately 76.941 sq. ft. total. Building area is approximately 26.700 sq. ft. Approximately 63 on -site parking stalls are provided. Proposed uses include bulk retail such as paint sales. hardware. etc.. and office. warehouse. 1. Earth c. A substantial quantity of presumably uncontrolled artificial fill covers all but the northernmost 50 feet (approximate) of' the property. The site surface has been elevated by filling to about the level of the West Valley Highway. with the fill depth ranging between 4 to 6 feet. The filling has created a steep bankline along portions of the eastern property margin. The native underlying soils are products of flood plain and normal channel deposition within the Green River Valley. which consists of grey -brown to grey. very fine sandy silts. silty fine to very fine sands, and occasional clayey silts. MEM • 79,,4e,,„ 1104%,■11: -- • 1•614•4 -ovp L4.1-0e4 Lurisk. • •eIP g...Ncet wt../te FRONTAGE AREA A min wpm AwLe.4-tv cc, Co" cvA•4•40 ce.k. IsAf afro 4444 1-•uPeL moo doter Hote. FRONTAGE AREA B PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. • R.O.W. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SYM3 p.BV DESCRIPTION SIZE OU. COMMENT (..) AGO. 0•00191., REV .11....E.OT 94 14 . ert% el.,. Ltr{ aerl L...4.01. 4.44. 1 .4., Ow Pwom res- .1...., •t b 410' Mow Albs. HUHN. mug, f ke 4,-4 OW Ito- Ion Co* . . IZZZ) ...,..^..,=!..V.A. 0 -.., .64 rel e.I b ' Or101,4 oty BA! fo. tlael • NOTES: 1. 1••4•••• 1911. ...... arfas 8,9991 for ase. rotorto Om. of 1 tn... et oat tow ...NI 1. 1111 990•• ..... 0.11 90 • ....Ms 1,0.119 1. n.... gle.as 940119960P ...... 0010.P" P•191 **1 1911 W • 41.12. 611191o. 0.00 O• 110 of 99/.. PPP 141•1• 1. /.1111wIs1o“ ve..99.er. 1. Pla•1 99a .9e111•1 41.• 10•m0 ..... 110 14 1101101, aid .9111, el ......•. ..... 11ed 00e, ....... 0114 stattIttpt 11 Ito "."". """‘ ••"••. 510,4. RAM TURN ONLY. — mos, n Km - 9 co •••• PANTED OTRPE • • • 1 Pi WEST VALLEY ROAD LIFT es. S.R. R. 181 . --L-.1%;..s.; 001 101; 4;111 • • ot SITE PLAN SIY-W e Ammendments to the parking layout have been submitted and reviewed in this checklist. Buildings have been slilightly reduced in size. JUL 2 1985 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. T ItA • CDk pc\/GX. ?CIAL �OIATES • 4230 198th ST S.W. October 2, 1985 LYNNWOOD, WASNINGTON98036 (206) 771 -2300 Veren Umetsu City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington PROJECT: TUKWILA TWO SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO E.I.S. CHECKLIST Dear Veren: ()CT 31985 CITY C. : TI;NI"iLA PLANNING DEPT. Please accept the revisions to the E.I.S. checklist listed below for the referenced project. These revisions reflected the site plan current as of this date. LOCATION REVISION Attachment to E.I.S. checklist dated August 2, 1985 #11 Transportation 14a Building area revised to 26,000 square feet. On site parking stall count revised to 45. Northerly most curb cut may become full movement if adequate sight distance is confirmed in traffic study being conducted. Trasportation 14g Revise as in 14a. Please feel free to call me at (206) 771 -2300 if you have any questions regarding these revisions. Sincerely, .2)c.ott „l har / Scott Shanks COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. SS /jd