The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-289-85 - CITY OF TUKWILA - LIFT STATION #2LIFT STATION #2 SE INTERSECTION OF MINKLER BLVD AND ANDOVER PARK WEST EPIC - 289 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Lift Station Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Southeast intersection of Minkler Boulevard and Andover Park West Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 289 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS [� This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date ( (IS'5 Signature —� You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City y Nall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM,Dp4$. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: [ BLDG n PLNG [ P.W. PROJECT LA 14 j±fdinel 1/:2 LOCATION 6E.77- c-inev 1.lyeilj U G 4 a DATE TRANSMITTED /0 -3' 8S� STAFF COORDINATOR /77 ? /%i OGL/ CN EPIC FILE 0289-F5 FIRE j POLICE (-1 P & R LOU FILE NO. ,RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /0-/O-F5--- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT Cc) rYO LFKI/ — 17 is N_Tra) / N /10 v ti Lni E 3\ d i rs ; r te prtoc- cs Diz Ilcou l/ ( J r21 1 N C '1Pn TILD Paul s)\ik DATE /0 /el cT COMMENTS PREPARED BY/ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG (l PLNG n P.W. fl FIRE PROJECT 0-1-1 j,b'th oyu 2 LOCATION 6 q DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR CN 35-20.3 EPIC 2 'q- 85 FILE POLICE (] P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /0/0-15- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT wcWietr DATE /p /*- COMMENTS PREPARE C.P.S. Form 11 "- "CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN EPIC FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: [] BLDG [] PLNG n P.W. n FIRE [POLICE [] P & R PROJECT jl -�1j 45,tb.d 'i u # 2. LOCATION 6E7 / A55170.41 a_ DATE TRANSMITTED /Q -3-8 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /0-10 -55 LOU, FILE NO. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING'THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT OTHER THAN TRAFFIC CONTROL AND FLOW DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD THIS PROJECT PRESENTS LITTLE OR NO IMPACT ON POLICE. 10/9/85 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 7) CN '105-,;M5 EPIC 02N -85 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTI G FORM TO: � ( BLDG PLNG n P.W. ( j FIRE POLICE [] P & R PROJECT L + jfrthoyu tt 2, LOCATION 6E u� , 1 L- %%'l/' } 4i FILE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED //0 -3 -85 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /0104:5 STAFF COORDINATOR t// 7/ OM% RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE ? COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG n PLNG n P.W. n FIRE PROJECT LOCATION 6E- UU DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR ) CN EPIC FILE !1 /D -3 -8 Q�d 35-20.3 0289 =85 POLICE P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /010 -Fs- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING. COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 1 %/1F-S COMMENTS PREPARED BY ( C.P.S. Form 11 'ITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CN EPIC FILE 35-X0. 0289= Fs TO: BLDG [l PLNG fl P.W. FIRE ( POLICE P & R ( n PROJECT L ++ iltdin ) .t 2 LOCATION 6E Olt ��l' � ntipyi ` DATE TRANSMITTED i - - ,RESPONSE REQUESTED BY FILE NO. STAFF COORDINATOR %Y202/a V9Gt/ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS ER CEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. 8y T U4w/i,4- (R, /0-/O-E5- ITEM COMMENT YOU WISH 4'44 V 01 Pid) 1985 ---- /i%d b t vI to 4 , -4 -/ ( w cei DATE /0///1 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • -2 uP4 11. s41 , sto car-- - 40.T Leer —2 RCW 19 —11 -960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know' or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project," 'applicant," and 'property or site" should be read as 'proposal," 'proposer," and 'affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Pump Station No. 2 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1856 4. Date checklist prepared: August 26, 1985 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start Construction October 28, 1985 Project Completion June 24, 1985 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or 11 be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know . whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Tukwila building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) Wastewater flows to the existing City of Tukwila Pump Station No. 2 are exceeding the design capacity of 1.1 MGD. The proposal pump station will replace the existing station and provide a design capacity of 365 MGD to meet anticipated wastewater flows. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submittcd with any permit applications related to this checklist. Within the Tukwila city limits, immediately to the southeast of the intersection of Minkler Boulevard and Andover Park West. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one other rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPI.ICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, pcat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, spccify thcm and note any prime farmland. Clayey silt d. Are there surfacc indications or history of unstable soils in thc immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. Topography of proposed site to remain similar to existing site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The size of the existing driveway and parking area will be increased slightly. The total site area is 0.09 AC. The proposed paved area is approximately 0.03 AC or 33% of the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A caisson type of structure is proposed for the pump station. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to thc air would result from thc proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Possible dust emission during site grading. b. Are there any off —site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractor to control dust emissions. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Temporary local groundwater dewatering may be required for the final connection of the pump station to the system. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Site area of 0.09 AC is minimal. Adjacent street, Andover Park West is provided with storm sewers. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Contractor must comply with building permit requirements. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs _ grass _ pasture — crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other — water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing shrubs to be replaced with similar landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing landscaping to be replaced with similar new landscaping at the completion of the project, including ground cover, shrubs and trees. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Does not apply. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Electrical power to be utilized for pump motors. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Below grade structure requires minimal heating requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Does not apply. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Does not apply. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing traffic noise will not affect project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short —term or a long —term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise during the construction of this project should not be significantly greater than the existing background noise. Long term noise from the site should be,limited to noise from the standby generator unit when operated. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Noise from the standby generator unit should not be significantly greater than background traffic noise, but a closure wall and muffler system is to be provided for the generator unit. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current use for the site is a pump station site. An office building is located on the existing property. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Below grade concrete structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CPI What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Does not apply. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low— income housing. Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low— income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Pump station to be below grade, concrete generator closure wall to be approximately four feet above grade. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A berm to be provided around generator closure wall and landscaping to be provided. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Existing driveway to Andover Park West to be maintained. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit sue'! -: _ � : -, tZ � ' �� . i ��; No. :.q ;,;:Qu6_ fee$ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Does not apply. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) watcr, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. Proposed project is located adjacent to a Union Pacific railroad spur. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. One, for routine pump station operation and maintenance. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Does not apply. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Does not apply. 16. Utilities a. ice, cle telephone s currently vailable at the site: sanitar sewer electricity septic system, other. water refuse serv- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities required. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is re on th ake its decision. Signature: .. Date Submitted: vo 1 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions arc very general, it may be helpful to rcad them in conjunction with the list of thc elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent thc proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect or conserve encrgy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline usc, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Does not apply. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? Does not apply. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Project complies with laws to protect environment. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY LI • A‘Ilttto gitcr CITY OF TUKWILA WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PUYP 51•IIO3( N O PUMP STATION N0.2 ....R jJ, :T� .,; ,: y °�j. (PROJECT PW 84 - SW- 5 ) I. AND tosto. 1, ,.. , - -• PUMP STATION BYPASS 1 \;^ PUMP STATION NO.e ..: - MODIFICATIONS „` ^I ; PUMP 91A 110N NO.T sums: `�" ' - (PROJECT PW 84 - SWO2 ) L1-.-v..-, 11 ,, Ia l ,� ...( 1 ILL ES MM SUUIHa • 7 I ---4 1111 ■ • T t•. �- -PUMP STATION N0.2 U --PUMP 83*0)0N 3(0.8 PROJECT LOCATION MAP DRAWING INDEX G -I TITLE SKIT, LOCA11011 MP, AND ORATING INDEX 0.1 WIMP 51AI10N N0. 2) SITE PLAN AND DETAILS C -2 (PUMP STATION N0. 2) FORCE MAIN PROFILE AND DETAILS ( -3 (PUMP STATION BYPASS MODIFICATIONS) SITE PLANS AND DETAIL L -1 (PUMP STATION N0. 2) LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLANS AND DETAILS S -) (PIMP STATION N0. 2) PLANS 5 -2 IP11P STATION N0. 2) SECTIONS AND DETAILS S -3 (PUMP STATION 1N). 2) PLAN, SECTIONS, AND DETAILS M -I (PUMP STATION N0. 2) PLANS AND DETAILS 3-2 (PIMP STATION N0. 2) SECTIONS AND DETAILS 1.7.3 (PUMP STATION N0. 2) MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS E -1 (PUFF STATION N0. 2) ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND DETAILS E -2 (PIMP STATION N0. 2) PLANS, 030 LINE DIAGRAM AND DETAILS ( -3 (P1MP STATI0N N0. 2) CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS AND DETAILS R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES 5E4TTL PROJECT LOCATION O - SPOKANE TACOMA W I N G T O N A S H LOCATION MAP CITY Or *urnLA, wASMSGTON WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TITLE SHEET. LOCATION MAP AND DRAWING INDEX 769-G -1.0 • • • • • • 0 r!.547A1PQ ••• • . •.n rr MAN °^LD P %flICLT (PLAN V2l1% •M[ ` 4 4 .4 •r4rk/1• ■•■ /t xA 11. -c p'!� >if+ Ir-RIGIATIdN LE6E •7MBot., 0JAn1. G%�tp- IP1I01J/r'1c( L '10. �fEL1G:LO.7:L*I' 1 ldRV •L/ -4 ELELTPY. LWifa -LiR .74.44..0 606v. PPE f4A■11POLD 1 PAJdac, G31312 ! ViOK- acJILG- raWLnl4 vAL`at ! KGY O L RJ'•rJ6.aV •iao EGA -U -fph ELCLT PIL Ttel vALVg _ I.E.4c' LATE¢IL 1/M11pJ UNES /cc Lv Y Fi'D O 2 /).•J01R0. 100'1- 1tc -LA 6' 4JP S/[Ar plectc., f �vaay • -PP-trt Nc;�oL�. ▪ 1 GA:Jp..LOdi012 - 5r r IC9 -/v •'s .tN .1gAV ta. -1 PA.JfyR'•1h2.4E1,7T GtV -JG J.v.z Np/•O ., ,41G,o.?1n.1 IJr1iEL, 1 r.n-.r J N.P.J •_ 'LIEMAt1L. G.ELY ALLAY -MEJTS MACY Cf i'- '.0=11 .ELT TO PW CVµ. en, JEEa. 're" T• .d A. ■MILL++S LG n .c aeAULATIJL. ELEL rcwlf¢uL w... -1 Fc R .•n„^" /61 .■•E. • '.t �JfeRlKJ/Ifi ✓r'L�Y-y1(L LCLAT�c.J', PR -,e TC TI4614L..1- JCr e...0 1 AJY {,AMA .e PI 1JbE PeO5E. TC et4,1s,-. 4 • •. r07T y.}! - 1pnLM: c ...104. • YWR s..SEVE M1J. 2 • L.R.C./.46.K 1I1p7J DES[..IATEv - ••LE...1.17E 4' /'•LL f'••/EV -}LGAL E•_ v, MN1LLnL ti'r,_e 470•1/ V _vex nT Er'w ../10 nw Local eor U'',PKP(- ff47GF e2JIGf- Go_iP_E� +J %W l IJ L%nl t-I-{ •b •_c A F LAI�ITII�U 1`1V2 1.4.T...1- r•.0. .z c' '- 71.OICv Ttr_e.L .I1: .0 ALL LP 'y✓ Nj01 r • r - cY ,- ncantrl Lv •1-L. 'Over-At/dap anti Y 1x07&7. r•�rc R rv+I1-04. EL 22 A.1 0ALl.r1>,IL..4 /.JA 1 1■2 fir • -rl- L. •TP J ,,,.. //n , car,.. UJM6'r. -1 "/Vice', /EST - 71 L.AM Ka'/•,E. W • C.• •iE -.. -Z" V/04-0 1.17.4.0 -- 4" AIL.EL - G•J A614DE -y P ,P,o -1 de. ('_ NJ YALE 1' • •c'' 77. - LacLT w /1rr(.. 1' n . • r/.- [t•_' ■ .'. ur.L4- - 4.rl.EC .• I0 -re, :Jr 2 410, 1.74 L• •67-4• 107.1 "04 4n /pw1vs wad Gnaw, r•N.r ilmon ...11=a■ mai Um s0m '51ut0 •00 4'LS CNOCILICI ILSE ••••• ..caw YCV,3E� ItICT711.• WAIF `""10-3.85 44o R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES C1irUi 1 .. w11• WiSNNG10N WASTEWATER SYSTEM MPROVEMENIS PUMP STATION NO 2 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLANS AND DETAILS caw` +.1 -•C 769 -L -1.0 TS 20 to 10 5 -B .Q -/5 C,ry OA TUK NIL.!__ Bx157 ORApE u/IL/TY E45EMENT 0 ^C a o- j'2 •o2i; oo- 1W Wp O `1 'at e eVW 'aWp 41 EtiiAQ 'M`Wp 5,0E WALL: �a In4` 6 O� W� es • 'o' e N ?, 2' ' 54 er,orwo %Il l USCHARGE MANHOLE 1 CHANNEL // / I "'L./ E+ 57 e .CHLE WAIN COwvEC TCv 4V/LL BE 1715CCMNEC7EO 4110 /TUGGED •E 15 0 J 0•00 5, 57 ;TAN /� / 1 10 BE 1 I REMU✓EO I E. I EA/S7.NG /AveLnENT -. EL 2/.50 4 RGE EASC 8 `1 D/5C 04 MANHOLE 1 I "DIA 1' D/ AM I F FORCEMAIN PROFILE SCALE NORM 4-4 10' VERT I'•S' E•,57 21 INTERCEPTOR - 7E12 94 PLAN SECTION EXISTING DISCHARGE MANHOLE MODIFICATIONS 110 SCALE 1 100 ^,•("'OVER FSgQK ester PA✓EO ROAD) .3 NI Ni ht 04 �n w O vWi i 9 p�o mtl. 50E ,oreI L' h NQ ivy tih4 Otl 1 /E. / • 5.52 /4.0 0/ FORCE MANN -25 ROADWAYS AA/D uA//MPROVED AREA5 1 PAVED AREAS 2'ASP■ALT CONCRETE NATIVE MATERIAL -- _ S/OE SLOPES 70 20 BE DETERMNNEDB THE CONTRACTOR, Ex /9f. 2/- I_c4NERCEPTOR SELECT,w71ve IS MATERNAL OU'CK O/SCOONECT CA'LG. FOR 8ACK- ALUSN //✓G O05 Yr "4 L✓E VALVE 2 -5V/UT -OFF 1' AIR RELEASE THREADED CO.4NECT/ON 7U 45'CE /JD /4-0 FORCE MAIN 4" BASE COURSE SEE PARKIN(. LOT A1✓0NG DETA9,, ONI0 C-1 BAIJKRUN GRA ✓EL TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION NO SCALE NOTE: EA/STiNG ,2' WATER MAIN LOCA71014 4,0 OEPTH SHALL BE ✓E4', 'eO /N FVLO PRIOR TO N'4 FORCE MAIN 1915T4L•T /ON LOCATE FORCE 4V444 BELOW THE CRO551N4 OF 7HE 44TERLINE /f P055'1LE. -5 GRAPHIC SCALE : d 6 0 0 TO E • p' 70 0 10 20 E I -/S /ELOWOAF VALVE 14.45' BEND AIR RELEASE VALVE ASSEMBLY DETAIL SECTION AIR RELEASE VALVE MANHOLE AND DETAIL 110 SCALE evi L 0. 44144;c9 ALLA 4.40 .•Y R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIAIES 'IT, 0E TL +AIL*. NASNINGTON NA4IEAA7ER S4STEM IMPROVEMENTS PUMP STATION NO 2 FORCE MAIN PROFILE AND DETAILS .J4.1- .999- LA,- AC 769 -C -2.0 5+•4416 5 81•P455 CONNEC,O.N WE7 WELL ACCE55 M4N•OLE 4'r AE `r — — - -J oyM, 55.1,0'- Va 5 //265e) _ASPUAL7 PAVEMENT L:. CO..,CRE 2 E. • EUetl.� ` Lc:76 WALL ,.4.5.064,_ 1 .o.P.6 TREE BA4r // /,+,T■ e0. W = AMP SITE PLAN- PUMP STATION N0. 5 SCAB ■'• 0• SITE PLAN - PUMP STATION N0. 7 SCALE ,'•IO FORT GENT PARK WET WELL ACCESS - e• 46455 AREA 42)460 P057(T1/.1 i Ij 0/07 ROAD cAeE7L 1 NEW G2)4R0 P05T 4 "FORCE MA /N +-r d' -' 576.455 C0NNEC7,ON PUMP STAT /ON NO 2. 1400201 SITE PLAN -PUMP STATION N0.6 SCALE: ■•• IO' 8441 4."' FORCE MAIN --- �I... -LAWN C / 804 W/ WATER METER i CONCRETE 804 W/ H B — CONCRE7E CURB CASCADE AVE 5. - 5706 510N _/2" 5/05 WET WELL ACCE55 CONTROL CA8 /NET 7000 BLVD. SITE PLAN - PUMP STATION NO. 8 SCALE: f• 0' 64/57/•4 4ROUND 2'.4 L' OcECA 0,5CONNEC7 COuPL/NG w /LOCK 716E CAP -ME TER 150. 2'- 4'•1'5' 8 /57661. 7RAFFK 7OvER 6 "0 / 876455 6 /6E VALVE 60) W /COYER 45' 8EN0 - I. • • 4' REDUCER WHERE REOU/REO (SEE TABLE) E,,5T,NG FORCE MAIN /606 512E SEE PLAN 4 7ABL6) I I W7e 512E AS / ,c6,'8LE COUPLING I—_ —I I ,REOu/REIS - SIZE w5 4602)/460 /776) 64,57,5.4 uN0E47,602)5.0 �_ PUMP 5747 /ON PumP 57470, FUSTING ORCE MAIN 5 /LE PPE 55LE REA/ERA-5 NO 5 4' •:' c••••• 4E0 REO'O N0 4 • •.- (o • •• REO REDO NO 7 4' ,. u • .1" REO REO'O NO.B ✓ b - - BYPASS CONNECTION DETAIL NO SCALE NOTES A 816455 CONNEC7,0, 70 BE INSTALLED AT EACH PUMP 57AT /ON SHOWN Z CONTRACTOR 70 6E5704.6 5/76 70 0R /415.47 CONO /T /ON 45766 /N57ALLA7/O14 OF 75.E 8IPA55 CONNECT /ON j ,NTERU.T/ON 05 4ORCEMA/5. AND PUMP S TAT /O,1 0PER.47 /0)1 70 86 A MAY /MUM OF 1.0065 47 EACN PUMP 5741/05. • 7,7/ 70 BE CONTACTED 47 LEAST 48 HOUR5 86506E THE 8EG•vN /5.G .506) AT EACH 62)M6 5767,0,1. GRAPHIC SCALE to o 10 20 1........ 1 1 L:�N,CnimAi 5.v,. �II.C.C.∎ n.n. "5.10 3 85 i :,.2):,o R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES 2. *ASnwcrfN 0)5118AT EN SYSTEMIMPROYEMENTS PUMP STATION BYPASS MODIFICATIONS SITE PLANS AND DETAIL 02•1999.57/ Ai 769 -C -3.. •", .1C.0.7 CE •CZOCA,10 -1 'a, ..e.."•EE r • • 5, . ■•• 41, t,..ca f„....? . .;,■,•,;., e. -* L. 14.- „ .... - .".. 5t--. r-ae•. A 55.7 ,-...2,...,.. ,.c.. 0.'6 C • , •0.• I • .71 CAA., 4401.” <IL., /0 15 /far ere VO"E 1- 1. W_ 5..01+1 - '11 I .111 Irl••••,0e • • • 1174. ,15 1111 e,reec., ACCESS 11010•■•••• 36E DEC Tret5. 'mar •A1.1■••+ 512 Ctf /, DAG, / 6 rc„,.,./ t,44.•■•. ri /14,C. 1,97 C0+4!..,17E- ron.,0 rvALL. 1011111 • .'56,1en• 1.1./ON 410 2 2€'5f aauLa C J- giceoftur e•os _ • • . ••04. •S■■•(:'-57.1 " SITE- PLAN 0. 355 . . • -- 5.1' 5,r5) Arc.. ` • 020 GerAIL 1,15. t.t+ 1(.1. e, 1-.A.'141e7, 0•5,:2-C ,,,,.- UNC,.0,0cIIIC I .7.•41A,A,e TAN, reE4141,2 Fx9+C�'11 H I EFP / 4114E.,4,..• 'IN DO V g l''f' R.I.4R k" vVrE 7 e• /61 A, •, (Aea«.5,10 1 1 1 CURBED ACCESS ROADWAY SECTION NO SCALE 45' BEND 90 BEND H SECTION AT ALL FITTINGS A e - e3E.,,,- ••••:, 111eA, AEGV+1,50 ,•••I 4..... .96,../r. 90' /4 2.7 5.0 - f,:nicg, TE ecoc. 1,10 CAIAL, 2- •441,,,41r CI • . L,C,57,4108E0 4L.,•CR40 0, /sex, 0144,04 '54 100+ az.; 554).....,; 05,05, 50,7 .5/44 4'E0..•4•9 +25•E4404 55A, n.,6 A.94 - co,c,erE OF ../044,4 44/0 ACCESfAC,,E.t. 4445.50■• 4.5...2-1(WAIA5,,,4 /GA, - 1,174/45 ../Cr HAVE /1,,,0 0, "9 555"62- HORIZONTAL THRUST BLOCKING DETAILS NO SCALE 1,54AZ /2` 1 DO Wool, 2.l__ Yerwarecy al.. re ' 1441 10•3..5s 4.1.10 &•-,,,.+IPAC. WET .%ec COA1G1E7G ' IPV,LUE•4r F•,f ',AL 5 414/44441/ ",<EL7. '059 /4,041e7- EL 17:oc,-/-1,---,■-•- fft,,,,Zi IY5 Net:- !,te Lf 74, t-•+.1...A.; .5,:•ENIA. V 5,5,0.-9 TO ee I 1=3 /4 3 10,4 4' 4,,AG *4/t4/44 • ,IS1006150 1,1115/* see A.ore 4 -- PO., (/4,444 EL 2100 ' ,<.• \I i e... :•••./.,c, 4 7C., f.:.:Ac 6,.•,..-.6 • 0.,e .1. 4!, it.-- -- ---.---) '•.4• ,-;•,, .*\ •11. 1Y, I ..i. C44,1950 , .•.1,0 CONCRETE WALKWAY DETAIL NO SCALE 0/ • 4,...,5 AV.,/ 5.,A,04/ 4.. P.• , Ar 4 ' 47 3 SEE 4/C: r 445,1,7.. 54.9•,41,, •• c•••••1',. 4. • 46._ 5.71,•• 7 4 ,m"..,.,05 • 1.+1E ,•"..c., ,,LeR or/lc.,/':Uve A, v4,6 1 L PLAN SECTION EXISTING WET WELL - TO MANHOLE -CONVERSION PLAN NO SCALE R. w. BE0, AND Asscx lAlf I TOP waSolintGR. A451( AWL. SYSTEM IMPROVI MINIS PUMP STATION NO 2 SITE PLAN AND DETAILS GRAPHIC SALE: 10 0 10 20 1 769- C- 4 •