Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-29-91 - RHONE POULENC - PLANT DEMOLITIONRHONE- POULENC DEMOLITION & REMOVAL OF CLOSED INDUSTRIAL PLANT 9229 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH EPIC-29-91. WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Demolition of a closed industrial plant that formerly Description of Proposal produced Vanillin, an artificial vanilla favoring. Equipment will be dismantled and the facilities demolished as part of the proposal. The demilition also includes the removal of above - ground structures to the top of the floor • slab, except for the laboratory building and administration building, both will remain. Proponent Rhone - Poulenc, Inc. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 9229 East Marginal Way South; Section 33, TWN. 23, RGE. 4E. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -29 -91 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. iiix There is no comment period for this DNS [] This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by proposal for 15 days from the date belowe lead agency will not act on this Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address Date Planning Director r\ Phone . 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukw'1 -s.,'"A 98188 Signatur You may app al this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: ( 1 /9 / 9/ MoN TU nau FFaI SUN TIME: 4! :.°' 0 Incoming 0 Outgoing TYPE: g'Clisit ❑ Conference El Telephone — Name of person(s) contacted or in contact with you: Organization (office, dept., bureau, etc.) Telephone No.: Location of Visit/Conference: SUBJECT: ghok, _ / ' y7e.„ SUMMARY: • Sj� /4 /eb _s txii /d��' of e/7 • / i' T��9 �s Grsed a21 /1-e) •$, re i�cs ./42 ae%ir2 A ( / U cc X9,0). • mo d &",' W Ahsa0044.es / M,f' ��. X64/ e/ / �' ,z7d/ /,y /suits, • //Wick, e40 Cale Caeil 4&e / V7 Z G2 • Pe Se ,q// 6.07/ C'cT i�ir� z7ie, ,// I'Qd. • le&I# g/1' r4$G A92- /4&,5. z� ej,I- • � '/ .s 'S,�S --• Signature: Title: Date: CINe V 11"`i l `41Vi!=I! 11-4.16. ML V 1I`VV CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT !'h _ "G ROUVIG FORM EPIC: - .29 -9/ ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED 6 STAFF COORDINATORD/i RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 6A//f/ DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED e attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project Please review an comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination., The revlew.file Is available in the. Planning Department through the above staff coordinator, Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,.;' Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT f4A 491/e 9// e/,e /, -7 ��%GtPi�u I 'TA ,S4-rri"m P(J kill fe -VIe1.3 a+ Ak Gill A - Jfl!I5 . 3 5 a./ / p /h ( / b12S err 5/g)-v CPYL a 1 1 19(-_ f %,re) f ,Ai Date: Comments prepared by: ''r CCYYI'V i ritVNIV p d4 Y AIL n V 1 VV ROUT O FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EPIC: -.29-9/ PROJECT ,Qha- _ "Da,l -jc ADDRESS�a�9 DATE TRANSMITTED / / RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 6,y #/ STAFF COORD1NATORDAex. `l%GSd» DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED g attached environinentai checklist was recewe regarding this project. Please review'and comment: below to•advise the reSponsibte official. regarding the . threshold• determination ; :The :. environmental review file: is : available in the Planning Department through, the •abovo'stait ..coordinator,. Comments regal-ding-the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT A .4>6- J4/lJ /0/ /°Aof Awe 9// / 6 ',401G a/evA Cifa u&c, A4,414414, > ,24 144/007 au. . oae c is ,6)!', /a 7 a try 7.t iivoz - -r � ; T • Date: 2/ 0/ Comments prepared by: , 09114!81 Control No. Epic File No. -- 2 9 ' 9/ Fee $225.00 Receipt No. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Rhone - Poulenc, Inc. Plant Demolition 2. Name of applicant: Rhone - Poulenc, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 9229 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington 98109; (206) 764 -4474; Lew Herr 4. Date checklist prepared: June 13, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): sea8101/+054q.51/1 6/13/91 The schedule for application, review and issuance of permits for this project is the basis for the planned sequence of demolition. The major permits required fall into two basic categories, those required for upland, or non - shoreline demolition and those required for demolition within the shoreline area. Because the Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permit require longer agency review periods than the Demolition Permit, the demolition work will be sequenced in two phases. The first phase will be the demolition of the upland structures which may begin immediately following the issuance of the Demolition Permit from the City of Tukwila and approval of the SEPA checklist. The second phase will be the demolition of structures within the shoreline area which will immediately follow issuance of the Shoreline, Corps of Engineers, HPA/Fisheries • • Permits. The pier and all structures within the 200 -foot shoreline zone will be demolished during this phase. This work will commence as soon as the required permits are obtained. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activ- ity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The site will be sold. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been pre- pared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA Environmental Checklist, prepared April 16, 1991, for soil excavation project. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental ap- provals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. RCRA Part B closure of interim status storage unit. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application for soil excavation project. Land Alteration Permit Application for soil excavation project. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Hauling Permit, City of Tukwila Grade and Fill Permit, City of Tukwila Demolition Permit, City of Tukwila Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, City of Tukwila Section 10 Permit, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydraulic Project Approval, Washington State Department of Fisheries Water Quality Modification, Washington State Department of Ecology 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the pro- posed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several ques- tions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) sea8l0lro54q.512 6/13/91 The proposal consists of the demolition of a closed industrial plant that formerly produced Vanillin, an artificial vanilla flavoring. Equipment will be dismantled and the facilities demolished as part of the proposal. Demolition includes the removal of above - ground structures to the top of the floor slab, except for the laboratory build- ing and administration building, both of which will remain. The site will then be sold. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur. over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located at 9229 East Marginal Way South in Tukwila, Washington. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Compre- hensive Land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive? sea8101/054q.5113 6f13/91 The project site is located adjacent to the Duwamish Waterway. Portions of the proj- ect site located within 200 feet of the Duwamish Waterway are considered "environ- mentally sensitive." • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. -General description of the site (circle one): at rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The site is essentially flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than one percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand, sandy silt, minor gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The project will not disturb the below -grade portions of structures; therefore, no grading is proposed. Certain structures are below - ground structures. These include basement, wet wells, and trenches. These will be filled with granular material and capped to prevent infiltration of runoff water into the groundwater. This material will be obtained locally or recyclable material will be reused onsite where possible. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion will be minimal because no structures will have the below -grade por- tions removed. Existing plant drainage will remain intact. sea8101/054q.51/4 6/13/91 About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The project will not change the percentage of the impervious surfaces of the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other im- pacts to the earth, if any: Drainage from the slabs of structures that will be demolished will be con- ducted to the existing storm drain system. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the pro - posal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) dur- ing construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minor dust generation may occur if very dry conditions exist at time of demolition. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other im- pacts to air, if any: Soils in demolition could be wetted to reduce dust. 3. Water a. Surface: sea8101/054q.51/5 6/13/91 • 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, de- scribe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Duwamish Waterway is adjacent to the project site. sea8101/'054q.51 /6 6/13/91 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project site is adjacent to the Duwamish Waterway. The pro- posal includes demolition of portions of the existing plant within 200 feet of the waterway and removal of an existing pier in the waterway. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. The existing barge dock located in the Duwamish Waterway will be demolished. No dredge material will be associated with removal of the dock. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and ap- proximate quantities if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Flood heights of the Duwamish River are controlled by the Howard Hanson Dam. The 100 -year floodplain in the project area lies within the existing, modified banks of the river and does not impact the project site. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materi- als to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be dis- charged to groundwater? Give general description, pur- pose, and approximate quantities if known. No. sea810l/054q.51/7 6/13/91 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for ex- ample: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the fol- lowing chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quanti- ties, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The existing plant drainage systems will be left substantially intact. The only alteration is expected to be the removal of roof leader con- nections and drainage piping from upper elevations of structures as they are demolished. Drainage from the slabs of structures that have been demolished will be conducted to the existing storm drainage system via the former roof leader connections or via floor drains which are connected to the storm drainage system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Reuse of the existing storm drainage system will reduce runoff water impacts. 4. Plants Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d.. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. sea8101/054q.51/8 6/13/91 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, pigeons, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Animals and birds which have been observed on or near the site include waterfowl, rodents, hawks, herons, and songbirds common to the region. The Duwamish Waterway is used by migrating salmonids and other fish, both fresh and brackish water species. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The area is occasionally used as a resting area for seasonally migrating water- fowl. Migrating salmon use the adjacent Duwamish Waterway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity, water, sewer, and storm drainage systems will continue to serve the two buildings not demolished. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. sea81O1i 54q.51/9 6/13/91 • • 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Elements of the process equipment to be removed that are known to contain asbestos are being removed under separate action by a licensed asbestos re- moval contractor. The asbestos removal is being performed under separate permit and the schedules provided in this plan take into account that the removal of asbestos and residual process chemicals will be complete before any removal or demolition under this plan takes place. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Standard safety procedures to be followed during demolition. The plant fire protection system will remain in place. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft, other)? None. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Demolition equipment will create noise on a short-term basis. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Equipment will have mufflers installed and be properly maintained. • sea8101/054q.51/10 6/13/91 8. Land and Shoreline Use sea8101/054q.51 /11 6/13/91 a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site was a former Vanillin manufacturing facility-- manufacturing opera- tions were closed in February 1991. Kenworth Trucking and Boeing facilities are located on adjacent properties. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures on the property include single -story offices and laboratory, and process -type structures related to former Vanillin manufacturing. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Demolition includes the removal of all aboveground structures to the top of the floor slab, except for the laboratory building and administration building, both of which will remain. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -2, Heavy Industrial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. "Industrial." If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? "Urban," in accordance with the King County Shoreline Management Master Program. h. Has any part o£ the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Portions of the project site are located within 200 feet of the Duwamish Waterway and are considered "environmentally sensitive on that basis. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. • Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics sea8101/054q.51/12 6ns/9l a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not in- cluding antennas; what is the principal exterior building materi- als) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if P any: None. • • t11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What 6/13/91 • • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show onsite plans, if any. Site is accessible off a private roadway to west of East Marginal Way South. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the ap- proximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improve- ments to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. sea8101ro54q.51/14 6/13/91 Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:. Not necessary. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl avail. . - at the site: f atural gas , ate fuse service telephone .. rotary sewer septic sys- Utilities circled are those currently available at the plant. "Other" includes the storm sewer system. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, water, sewer, and storm drainage will continue to serve the two buildings not demolished. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead age cy is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. sea8l0l/054q.51/15 6/13/91 TO BE CUMPLticu ar APrLI` i D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS c.valuat.io11 rur Agency Use Only (do not use this sheet for project actions) - NOT APPLICABLE .ecause these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the/list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster .rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Agency Use Only ' 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: • How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. . Evaluation toy. Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a pro- posal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the pro- posed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objective of the proposal is to demolish a former vanillin production plant site on East Marginal Way South, adjacent to the Duwamish Waterway. All existing equipment and demolition debris will be removed from the site. The site is to be sold. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None are proposed. sea8101/054q.51 sea8101/054q.51 /18 6/13/91 EAST 1053.:0 , ' -5 2l'02'67O:E CI . 561 Ni(OEEOI. 76 'r.:C; • _ ••• •- E65' '/ 566.99IC9_C • 542 e2 cc, _Lc, - 5331 ' yEaCt Oat m86.7497.4 +66 .9 1 t?VA'IFICATIOR• SURVEY IDENTIFICATION NO.: REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 80.: SURVEYOR'S' ADDRESS A COMPANY: •Oi21.o1 : 22333 '•BUS1, HOED A HITCHI40s. INC. 2007 MINOR AVENUE EAST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 99102.- TELEPHONE: . CERTIFIED' TO: (20:7) 323 -9119 RHOME- PCJLENC STr1ART TITLE COMPANY OF • • .WASHINGTON, INCORPORATID •THIS IS TO CERTIFT THAT THIS NAP OR PLAT-AND THE SURVEY 0P WHICH IT IS RASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE W1., •MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS 'FOR ALTA /AGSM NANO TITLE SURVEYS," JOINTLY ESTAB- LISHFU-AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND AGSM I11' 1990; AND MEETS 112 "ACCO - RACY REQUIREMENTS OF A-CLASS •A• SURVEY, AS DEFINED THEREIN AND INCLUDES ITEMS (2 L 9) Of • l TMEFNF.•. 5T •r A. HITCHINGS, P.L.S. O. 2333 I - THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE IS BASED 'PON 1ORN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED PROFESSIONAL 5'.9tVEY PRACTICE. RE MANE NO OTHER WARRANTY, EITHER DRESSED OR INGLIED. i THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED ACCOROING.TO THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION, BURNISHED BY STENART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INCORPORATED, COIQIITMENT NO. 137029, DATED FEBRUAF ?. 1, 1991. THE EASEMENTS 'I SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON RELATE TO TM19 C0101ITMEOT.'. NOTE: EASEMENTS CREATED OR RESCIND':D AFTER THIS DATE ARE NOT . SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON. . Figured Facilities To Remain MAJ S A H 1' • 60' 2 -22 -91 e6191.01