Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA EPIC-297-85 - STORSETH & ASSOCIATES - FOSTORIA PARK REZONE / ANNEXATION
FOSTORIA PARK ANNEXATION REZONE S. 134T" PLACE & 42ND AVE. S. EPIC - 297 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 REVISED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (Originally issued November 1, 1985) Description of Proposal Rezone of approximately 2.36 acres of<land proposed to be annexed to'the City of Tukwila. Current King County zoning. SR Suburban Residential Proposed zoning. is Tukwila's M -1 Light Industrial Proponent Robert Storseth and',.Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Triangular parcel located between S. 134th Place and 42nd Avenue S Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 297 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS ELI This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by ,A///, lfY �/ /9,6 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This Revised DNS is issued subject to the original three conditions and one additional condition. See attachment Responsible Official Brad coilins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date I2 - lG - 85 Signature �' -f-� You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor Page Two DNS EPIC 297 -85 Building F Fostoria Park 1. Design and construction of drainage system to handle to handle on and off site drainage. 2. Install oil /water separators in all parking lots 3. Design and install a landscaped buffer along 42nd Ave. S. and prohibit any ingress or egress along this right of way. Access will be limited to S. 133rd Street. 4. Proposed development shall be referred to the Board of Architectural. Review for design review. WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Rezone 2.36 acres of land from Unclassified to M -1 (light industrial). Pre - annexation zoning =King County S -R Proponent Robert Storseth and Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Between S. 134th Place and 42nd Avenue South Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 297 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued subject to the attached conditions. There-is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Thursday, November 21, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date i I1 &S Signature 4, Cm- OL-o You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Page Two DNS Epic 297 -85 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 1. Design and construction of drainage system to handle on and off site drainage. 2. Install oil /water separators in all parking lots. 3. Design and install a landscaped buffer along 42nd Ave. S. and prohibit any ingress or.egress along this right of way. Access will be limited to S,. 133rd Street. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ON EPIC FILE '5 -Jq9 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RO NG FORM TO: BLDG P NG V1 P.W. / I FIRE 1✓ I POLICE 1/ P & R PROJECT &(J,Syoy /Q, LOCATION 61385 oj, %t33y- ow. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 4/-2 _ ?5- ' ESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ifre" ©/2 26on' ? /*Cka --pi /% do i ✓/ f' /3`% l= /v Ah/s7i a.i2e f ,c). h87dt /fy0 B1 a- 1104e."1` 4OF /eitCt',hAe; 65.144_, %dS� .;,A Q �e /v • f /33 !'( ®ez , fC / / )) / 6 /fcc L%/rx lx l�z �yL,y a-7-,( Aw, / /d.,, d& /o e'— e/e v,c4 ,90, pb ).e.'d c . z Gc 47 A.s` cm" v,ca✓ i,� •mot' DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Control ..o. ?5 -1Q61 Epic File No. 6_a2q7 -Y5' Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 12/i'7 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FOSTORIA PARK REZONE 2. Name of applicant: FOSTORIA ASSOCIATES /ROBERT STORSETH INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 15610 S.E. 24th Bellevue, Washington Phone: 747 -5665 - Robert Storseth 4. Date checklist prepared: October 30, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansio.n.,. or further activity related to or connected with this pi oposal? If yes; explain 2) - Construction of Building "D" and future Buil ings_'f ", demolition .f 2 s_f_ dwelling. \ ,F,,,°.F " / P °tL :.—a 1) - Annexation to City of Tukv441a. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. t) cn, _LA- 3 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation to City of Tukwila. :�� _.- ►, ,�. 12"4.3..41.:.., * fir 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Approval of annexation to Tukwila. ri ft-1 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone will enable construction of concrete and _ ]sass Dffi ce /warehouse huii cling_ with building area of approximately 30000 s.f. site to be annexed to the City of Tukwila. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See attached legal description and proposed site plan. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes - A new fall out struct. will be required and the drainage course will feed into a treatment 5 cmp pipe out to 133rd St. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. A portion of Building "F "site will be filed with the preload from the site of 8uilsling "E ". No fill material required for Building "0" 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Drainage course will be diverted_j..nto an cmo pipe per #2 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve .any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated W volume of discharge. No — 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: (aattail ) buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Entire site will hp stripped as required by the soils report tp_LoaIrjjct the buildings on the site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping mill match_ Buildings "A ", "B" & "C" to the best of our knowledge. at this time. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, Starlings /crows, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes - 2 u noccu ed _ ` chel Liriga__tallE dpmn1 ishpd e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County Zoning - SR (Suburban Residential 4 -6 uni s /acre) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County Comprehensive Plan - Urban g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? No h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 20- 35.:..x..0, Approximately how many peo would the completed project displace? None some; on -site dwellings are currently unoccupied k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None necerssary • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Use will be consistent with M -1 designation on Tukwila Zoning Code. Specific uses will be reviewed when business licenses i sued, 't�� 5 i el6 5, 12.2'3'15t• - 5,13:4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 67_ . /&L., s,i33 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glazing will match buildings "A ", "B " & "C" which is low glare Bronze tint glazing b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All on -site lighting will be of low glare 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Memorial Park (135th & Interurban Avenue) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None prop osed at this time Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access from S. 134th St., 133rd St. •and 42nd Ave. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Interurban and 133rd St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 139 stalls None TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Noise level likely to increase once development in completed Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases Keep activities within limits of permit and co requirements.. ..:z1() s. 0,3-.45t 1-4..0, 34rtu 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Yards will be replaced by pavement and Building ,Aezone will allow more intensive development to occur Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: None at this time for rezone V3. ttl I'rY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING F TO: BLDG el PLNG PROJECT F(j, yjQi 410FN F.5--/q9 EPIC Cl)/ - c.207 -AS FILE I ( FIRE 171 POLICE P & R LOCATION /36s 6, / 35 ow. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED //".2 -15 ESPONSE REQUESTED BY / / .7- 0,5---Q ,46, STAFF COORDINATOR '4F" ■' RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH, CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 30- J�2 Pz N Pr- G C S y S 4-ENt, u> f A'h.0 3 cY © l rZ S c3 c /4- 2a w l 4-e t DATE a/ /(. COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • .N EPIC FILE 85-189 C�Qr ..-02q7-95 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 1 TO: IIB 'G I7IPLNG I /IP.W. ✓(FIRE (7POLICE (✓IP &R PROJECT /Q, �0�� adix.tzziho7u L2 zgy2.2J LOCATION C/36,5 j,k 5'- 6. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED //-2 �85 STAFF COORDINATOR ESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT '?1n MMO,t)5 DATE (( lkr COMMENTS PREPARED -EL C.P.S. Form 11 r - CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG el PLNG I "j P.W. PROJECT F LOCATION 8385 ;j, f 3$- . DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR g5-11q EPIC Ea, l'-2Q7`g5 FILE //-2 -g5 FILE NO. ESPONSE REQUESTED BY / /2- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT / T— //� l e2o, e .74A /�ot,J S C// evel91017W94 U _ •ih/ o Ace, b/d /11 re.sc,AL , a, uri c J DATE 1 1 /11/i{ S� COMMENTS PREPARED .B C.P.S. Form 11 ',CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Fel BLDG [ PLNG P.W. I/I I/ I FI'E POLICE (✓ I P & R PROJECT LOCATION c/385 o5,05pi- th. DATE TRANSMITTED // "2 "8S _ESPONSE REQUESTED BY / /2- ,65',5-Q` ,p RESPONSE RECEIVED •N ?5 -)q9 EPIC C10/.- ,?g7 -9S FILE FILE NO. STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT - /4/&' e4 /t)/,2 Nm--L OI77 /ti�� Q /2V// aI C,q /o 4J DATE /// COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • •N EPIC E?0i /_- 02q7 -g5 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG [ PLNG I1 P.W. �✓ ( FIRE gi POLIC PROJECT F6,5tYjCl, LOCATION 6/365-,5,103A- DATE TRANSMITTED 4/-2 ",j ' ESPONSE REQUESTED BY / /-,27- eYS'Qc� STAFF COORDINATOR Q.,'t r1. DAtJ 101 z�r) FILE NO. RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. DATE `/ 1-- t5 COMMENTS PREPARED C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • 8 - -jqq EPIC 540//)_-207- 95 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG I.✓( PLNG P.W. Imo[ [IRE (P OLICE EI P & R PROJECT f _if ' LOCATION (,138,5 6,05Y- DATE TRANSMITTED //"a2 -'Y5 ' ESPONSE REQUESTED BY / /;.7-�', FILE NO. STAFF COORDINATOR 6241-/ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND. COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 SP90/(10 /44 . �.)i i. fo✓�oeifl- /,4 ,val,fTiau ,'6 E 6a7ed off ~f-t41 7"°419/7 , - L A tw %hL 7 d ve-t ,- L. i - -1ce cake • w ' - ea, S`z: at, 5 a-n.f,C J' /33rd 740 de-ttreep-h4opti-- 47A-14- 74,4(e..4 % - .e awes s 4,9 X727 L- 7'i a,J ,1)4/ic • �1'�i� o3, Attere Controio. ?.5-16/61 Epic File No. E":14Q,i‘G— aG7 -85- Fee $100.00 Receipt No. Ja,49 % ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FOSTORIA PARK REZONE 2. Name of applicant: FOSTORIA ASSOCIATES /ROBERT STORSETH INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 15610 S.E. 24th. Bellevue, Washington Phone: 747 -5665 - Robert Storseth 4. Date checklist prepared: October 30, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 2) - Construction of Building "D" and future Building "F ", demolition of 2 t_f_ dwelling. 1) - Annexation to City of Tukwila. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation to City of Tukwila. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Approval of annexation to Tukwila. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone will enable construction of concrete and cal ass.ffj celwarehous_e_ huiJ di ng with building area of approximately 30,000 s._f._Qj a 2.36cre site to be annexed to the City of Tukwila. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See attached legal description and proposed site plan. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAP • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, Gradual slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3 -4 %± c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils on the site range from good sand and gravel native to clay - sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is a low ponded area which will be filled and preloaded as required e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be appoximately 12_,MOLL .y. of existing preload moved to the _west porti9n_of the site f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes - Erosion is possible during clearing and construction. All Soils will be stablized by landscaping and pavement for truck maneuvering and parking g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75 -30% • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction installation per erosion control plan and sediment fence. After construLtion there will be no erosion 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust and vehicle emissions during and after construction due to traffic generated by_ building operations b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust from construction phase will be reduced by careful site and street cleaning as required by City of Tukwila 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, currently there is an open drainage_coiirs_e_ along the northwest property line • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes - A new fall out struct. will be required and the drainage course will feed into a treatment 5 cmp pipe out to 133rd St. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. A portion of Building "F" bite will be filled._. . with the preload from the site Qf_..Bui1ding "E ". No fill material required for BuiJ ' " " 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Drainage course will be diverted _into an cmp pipe per #2 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 1 • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. All sewage will be collected and connected to- existinq S.S. lines in S. 134th St. and/or S. 133rd St. c., Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The only runoff is from storm water and will be collected in on -site sheet retention ponds, then will be drained at a controlled rate_into existing storm system Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention 4.- Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, other shrubs K grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: 6-attai1 buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Entire site will be stripped_as required by the soils report to Dastrac t the buildings on the site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other' measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping mill match_ Buildings "A ", "B" & "C" to the best of our lawleilgll at this time. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Starlings /crows, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or •endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric natural agif , oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The natural gas and electricity will be used for heating and cooling. Other requirements wi tthe �e_t at the time the space is leased b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Proposed project will meet the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code for heating, cooling, lighting, thermal insulation and glazing 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Because theme a buildings are spec. exact tenants are not known at this time. Uses will be those allowed under Tukwila's 9 -1 Zoning Requirements 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services arm anticipated. Standard fire and police protection will be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Building operations will be maintained in accordance with all apolicable environmental regulations • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicle traffic. None _which will affect the project 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Long term - vehicle traffic will be the only noise. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Short term -noise generated from construction of the project. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays construction 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction schedule will be maintained to minimize noise impacts on adjacent property. Vehicle traffic should be scheduled with consideration to noise impacts (i.e. minimize early deliveries) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There are two single family houses on the site, one with unattached garage • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes - 2 unoccupied 5. E. dwe.l lingsLiaLliEL dPmol ishe.d_ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County Zoning - SR (Suburban Residential 4 -6 uni s /acre) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County Comprehensive Plan - Urban g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? No h. Has any part of the site been classified as. an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 20 -35 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None - some on -site dwellings are currently unoccupied k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None necessary 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Use will be consistent with M -1 designation on Tukwila Zoning Code. Specific uses will be reviewed when business licenses issued • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None Two middle- income houses c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None per a & b 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of , any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? "D" 21' + from finish floor. - Principle exterior_ material will be concrete. "E" 19' + from finish floor. Principle exterior material will be concrete. "F" 27' + fin. flr. Principle ex. mater. will be conc. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed project will be de&igned_ to meet Owner's needs and to provide as little as possible impact on the surrounding mmuni±y Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glazing will match buildings "A ", "B " & "C" which is low glare Bronze tint glazing b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All on -site lighting will be of low glare 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Memorial Park (135th & Interurban Avenue) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed at this time Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access from S. 134th St., 133rd St. and 42nd Ave. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Interurban and 133rd St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ 139 stalls - None Evaluation for Agency Use Only •. • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak times 8 -9 a.m. and 5 -6 p.m. Approximately 70 -80 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None at this time 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No impact on schools and health care Increased fire and police consistent with building operations per M -1 Zoning designation b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None required Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 16. Utilities AMENDMENT TO CHECK LIST a. Ci cle utilitie currently available at the site: electricity natural gas (water (efuse service telephone sanitary sewer septic system, other. The water service for the annexed site will hp from King Co. #125 Water District or from the City of Tukwila b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. New water meters will be required for all three hj,Lj n q s C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to mal ke its desisi` Evaluation for Agency Use Only Signature: LA I'J 5W& _1 rt1t ts-uwaem. i/ Date Submitted: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAIII D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Noise level likely to increase once development in completed Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Keep activities within limits of permit and code requirements 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Yards will be replaced by pavement and Building Rezone will allow more intensive development to occur Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: None at..this time.for rezone Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Development of office /warehouse enabled by this Rezone would utilize energy and natural resources in amount proportional to level of development Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Adherence to code requirements and environmental standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No effect on these areas Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? If the Rezone is approved it will allnw develnpment of land uses consistent with Tukwila'c Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation, which is light industrial Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation. for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Not part of shoreline area Landscaping will be installed to an extent beyond zoning code requirements and a proposed building will be constructed at a lower elevation on the property How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Rezoning will allow an office /warehouse use to be built_, This development would result in increased demands on water, electric, and sewer utilities as well as the road network Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Restrict access to S. 133rd St. per review of the Public Works Department 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No known conflict • • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? The proposal is consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Designation (Light industrial) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None required Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT" • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Make zoning consistent with Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Rezone King County S -R to Tukwila M -1 Designation 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? No alternatives available given annexation of annexation 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: No alternatives available Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No conflict with Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None needed -23- City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 October 29, 1985 Robert Storseth Robert Storseth, Inc. Fostoria Associates 15610 S.E. 24th Bellevue, WA Dear Mr. Storseth: We have determined that the rezone will require a separate environmental checklist with a separate fee of $100. Please recopy this information onto the blank environmental form, sign, and return by 12 p.m. Thursday, October 31st in order to get this issue onto the November 14 Planning Commission agenda. If you don't return by 12 p.m., Thursday, we will not be able to schedule the rezone until the December 19th Planning Commission meeting. We need further information for the following questions. Please add this in the appropriate places. #8 (p.12) Provide an approximate range of the number of workers on the site. #10a (p.13) Provide specific information for Building D. #14b (p.16) Provide approximate range of the number of trips per day. We hope that this rapid schedule does not present a problem for you. Your cooperation will ensure that the rezone receives a timely hearing. Please call me or MoirrBradshaw at 433 -1848 if you have any questions. Sincerely, hucA -96)6 Rebecca Fox /ks cc: Planning Director File (STORSETH) ( #1B) ContreNo. Epic File No. Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: /i31 h% ./x kr:21_ 2. Name of applicant: h.��rfr9-zL Anac.c.g- //e-e -y ,4- 1`2›.'= -'' 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /5'‘./0 &*. f % )44- ,��e Gfa�+rcu.� G<JIa 7y 7 - 566 S" 4. Date checklist prepared: D(,„/06v_ z-9 /4' fX 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 2) - Cv.�d ✓chi �� / /d /n- c/ /i ^o%' hati '7 2. S. F We /brty -, 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ,9,q 'a./i • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. t ,O,r✓, dor An(iXecl5?n 6 To/rw)!.. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. dorrov- / e rant �%/ ehcc %/C ce�f/rv�h on GoAi ere-C2 � o-"� ,c Addlimi i /G !✓J fM Lri /dirr Gu-e4 d5 app xir�. Q 2 00 o J: art. A 2. ) Q G -C 1Z4dc fv 4 a ,i n Cxl.,/ /t, 14 C- -, 7,.4.--7-/s, 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. ,le-A a- 6!x cd r d j fai' de- ,cf-7 ,$ Or.; •-a( pry,e es ✓/ 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Nc TO 5E Cv'! ?LETED BY AFPL:CA:IT _.3 e for Agency cy Use Only _;IV R,1NmENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. Seneral description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, Gradual slopes Flat, b. what is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3 -4 %t c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils on the site range from good sand and gravel -- native to clay - sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is a low ponded area which will be filled and preloaded as required e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be apor4 mately 12,000 c.y. Df pYicting re1nad moved to the west Dortion of the site f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes - Erosion is possible during clearing and construction. All soils will be stablized by landscaping and pavement for truck maneuvering and parking g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75 -80% et Proposed r easures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During copatru cljon installation - per erosion control__ol_an and sediment__ fence. After construction there will be nQ erQsiQn___ 2. Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust and vehicle emissions during and after construction 604l iv I ,{ �j lJViIdiu� o c.j�c Vb'L b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No iPs�ex -+- - �f K I T C T 1 c. rte' ose measures to re uce or control emissions or other im. cts to air, if any: Dust from construction phase pe1,444 be reduced by 4.s- c ea site- a4--y( J#''- cal e iTa� rclu,Lv-e tl ivy (-4-1 Jl Tuti.-4 4 _va Jatr)n :r Agency Use Only 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including_ year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state ;hat stream or river it flows into. Yes. currently__ there is an open drainage courig along tt north - wes tproperty l i ne • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the descrited waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. yet - A new fall out struct. will be required and the drainage course will feed into a treatment 5 cmp pipe out to 133rd St. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredce material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of f i )1 rIateri jl,, A portion of bui ing F Site the preload from the site of Building "E'. No Lit j.,akrtruz K.lu+rf4 Lo-, 0141d i ." 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Drainage course will be diverted into an cmp pipe per #2 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or 4i11 water :e discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and. approximate cJan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. All sewage will be collected and CQII0 tesl Q existing S.S. lines in S. 134th St._10ALor S. 133rd St. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The only runoff is from storm water and will be collected in An -site sheet retention agnds._th�- will be drained at a contrQ].led rate. Lnto existing storm system Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: (• buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass•, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Entire site will be stripped as required tly the soils report to construct the buildings on the site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: proposed landscaping will matrh buildings A.B &C to the best of Sur knowdaeAt this time. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, Starlings /crows, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None _va:Ja;,on for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. :;hat kinds of-energy electric. natural ; oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to Beet the completed project's energy needs? Describe v:hether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The natural gas and electric ty will hP used for heating and cooling_ Other requirements will be✓st_t It—the_time_the space is leased b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation feat':res are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: proposed prnjert will meet the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code for heating, cooling, lighting, thermal insulation and glazing 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including, exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. RPral1SP these buildings are spec . exart tenants are not known at this time. Tcn3nt3 ill b, as a l e- i^ Oies wial.e. •f /0K- 6- (1ov`%cd iuK ' M 1 ( 2v.�rtiq •c�,�r/e�i, 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nn cperial emerggenry cprvire5 0.-re r^+�h'c��•f'�o� d a dard fire and olice 'rotection wol e required Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: ildrK; vv i 4rna t mafi riZt/Ne4 (ti a GU) i Lt wrfi Ar> 4nmA 1 kle4lh -L r^Cq U i a ho✓u our 5. Noise .) ',That types of noise exist in the area. .: ;ich ,:,ay affect your project (for example: t-a`fic, equipment, operation, other) ?- �X1SS.10.9 Yehjcle_ traffic. None which will affect the prQ1e.t___ 2) ghat types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for exaTale: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? ;ndicate wWg hi) rrrk-vechiic e ctrahfci cmwi l50Tet die son fy Evaluation for Agency Use Only noise. Hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. . Short term -noise generated from construction of —the projec . •urs will se approximately 7:DU a. to 4:00 3) Proposed measures' re•uce or con rot not e impacts, if any: .#l,m 5,f vc Berl 1411,661e w,i1 be pviaiKfueNLjb_iirLa,o,,+ 0 o l K 1 Bh P-�l o��i+^'� lie G •'- h111,41. 1AA- e 6,41D - riatA lriS 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1 S - 1 1 LWleet eommers4al . Has the site been used for agriculture? if sc, describe. No C. Descri a any structures on the site. o 1. There are twol'h"uses'on the site s ). a Igo p.m. Go..+ShvaV✓i Lam-- -Tl:• ,N.LA Pl = N1'':r;G DEPT. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any tructures be demolished? If so, what? es• Z vnv/ c ie€/ — F• fv he e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? cc.," y Z- vr, /n2 • S £Svbv - G v.r..- A-4-re f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 47 If applicable, applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? /✓0 g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Abele k a"- -�� ce-sz T k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: AVOWAVGe.4. -47 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: V.Pe j !M / 4r ,ee1,7 1` N /f/i /f -/ C1PJ .s4/SFiy,, oi, #i.A /a 227 r i,.7 c v d Q. 0-4'e bps/ n(tS /,GP7 -l.K 4 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be or.:,v ;d:o, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or !c.;- Inco,le housing? None f('ylLl.� b �Yp oximate y how many units, if any, would be eli- minated?, Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None 1. Two middle- income houses c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Nnnp ppr a R h 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; ;hat is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 21' + from finish floor Principle exterior material will be concrete b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control a._sth tic impacts, if any: Proomed Project will_be desigaEd__ to meet. Owner's needs and tQ provide as little as_____ possible impact on the surrounding community -13- agency ',Ise ,n;y 13u,Ic1, ri ' d' .,'_ ` - T.C.`f'LA Pt '1^'1r;;; DEPT. o1 �r L • 11. light and Glare a. What type of lignt or glare will produce? What time of day would it 7a—'y Glazing_ wil l match buildings A,B &C_ which is. lori.gl.iare_ Bronze tint glazing b. Could light or glare from the finished ;reject be a safety havrd or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All on -site lighting will be of low glare 12. Recreation [.va1,,ation for Agency Use Jny a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? kr /mob r lei- 19 - -7 .O /14'7C (e/ r q /., fy°url,� ) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed at this time -14- • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. :.re there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be On or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. Noke. Lvt0Wk c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: . Noy-► ie�..z,v( 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access from S. 134th St., 133rd St. and 42nd Ave. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Interurban and 133rd St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have ?, How many would the project eliminate? 139 stalls None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Number of vehicle trips not known at this time. Peak times 8 -9 a.m. ands 1677F- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None at this time 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No impact on shcools and health care b. Proposed measures to reduce or impacts on public services, if any. None dust-Ix-tai control direct Evaluation for Agency Use Only ✓4i) • • Evaivat on for Agency Use Only 16. Utilitie Avon itJowt&a'r a. Cir le utilities currently available at the site: natural as refuse service c anitary sewed septic system, otner. b. Describe ,the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. New water meters will be required for all three buildings C. Signature Tne above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: -17- '771 I .TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? n/o %ft /eve/ //Re // / ,,, riade mince. q%e ✓e I pm . '- /1 co,79 /C /e d Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: /ce ep is h ' h e.r Ardf in /'n., /-r JL • i( a s,uQ 10 de Kl✓/ era/ /op i-r 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Ye j /// 6e fi°r /•tcet/4/ /04., e 'new f a n!1 6u:4641 , z',ie AwV a/ /Ow mote idi ,dr ve ciwe-edros`e.i /b t , Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Nonc adt f�cf hfrc " 't 2an4- • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Evaluation for Agency Use Only Du/t /opnttn' d1 DH7 i.Jat+ehovt endb %r 49 1111/r i t _ ■ ? D n e 14001) re( / , z , t o eelf V 1 hat /i/# -/l Loviuv /p at- h•,a,nf- propv.hor, iG kvc/ JJ dee,rlo %orre).f Proposed meastres to protect or conserve energy and natural resour,es are: Ave tr4►►u. fv co c% /e e-lfr„eritr 4Rd •44/1•w,..+ts• -tne d f2-ndaf9J 4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? /Qv aire, C On f ,j.e Aacde Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 14- iC Z-poie /.i #P`•-•v ✓e- /t F.s /ff d //oW d f yr /v r►� t',I i- 2 v.K.! Lon.Kl fort w /t� T kn4/ar Coh pTe he?1Jrit Lznd 44c P /ate . deji., 44,1:A /i L, °9ht / ,,c10,t4-14 :r• SEvaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: _fro t �� Jo,-e/,,,€ a /elk - I Ad /t �4 /'if r.t: /fed ti et o e —4 f- he 10"4" 2Dn/.?/ � rep,/rz'/r+errtf and a /o neared 611i41ifry hid/ /Ile cop,i/vc4/ xi" A /over e%✓0ial o,. /rte a .//, How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N0,` / /e0 4/Q 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? fc'2V n,np, N/ /// er/ /olv ti) 6[ ' #,//`• 7lir /eve /oiome,,t A✓oci/d /61 v/14- inert, ace,A' pfs°.,,g it 0,1 J frP/t°t41( I-60/e/ ah/ihe./ a1 we // e fi4e raaI hefwo,,E Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: /Qas17'cf a cce. 74) 1 /33'! d/• re,/i 14.) 71 fly 4,4,//c. do° �t��hrer,t 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. lip /rnowh Lo/tj /le-14 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? 'Ar /.PPOSA/ it ec,"fif,•nf with ?*fwl /as (.a+,/•.rhtwp&t Cs,-41 u.te Pvbey /hcn Ar✓lnaho►: �41,/- /`rdvsl% -:4.OJ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: . r r v/.,i.i. .TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL ICI • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? - /1a_.te 2-ohin comer/ ( . r P //I To,tw//a Co.npr(he.iIi''c /-a..d !/1c 'hip, - Re i-on t King Lo ✓� fy f -0e d e.r�9nah / H -/ 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? A/o a /Av-na f rcr avail /e fivt n .rir/rexc4a 9 annek -A40,; 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: /vo 1 /hri,a/nrf 'rvw/id44e. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No coljici< L///* 71,4- i/Q Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Non( needed. -23-