The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-298-85 - WEYMOUTH JAMES - SILVER CLOUD MOTELSILVER CLOUD MOTEL NEW 48 UNIT MOTEL 13050 48T" AVE. SO. EPIC - 298 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal New 18 -Unit motel Proponent James L. Weymouth Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 13050 48th Ave. South Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 298 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ET There is no comment period for this DNS [[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below.. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date /-t. -- I'3— gS Signature 7/t_�tk You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS 77.'4-'7777 of,Jeg -MEMO • CITY or TUKWILA TO: Phi/ FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: rl k--17 eeL.-ry 1,oce_K- ' - .fr■ . . _ • • • 607/e/ev LI:P,701:6 a,e" //-/e5 / TO: FROM: DATE: /i./6-95" S U BJ E CT: WA Qe## #i :€ ) OFUCE MEMO CITY or TU KWI LA (, iu Co d•U , uil d.'» ,aui - &vi W.J 'CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • III CN $5-333 EPIC .?98-85 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: r71 BLDG El PLNG {1 P.W. (i FIRE (%I POLICE P & R PROJECT of 1 kW dud rnota - building Pi,,,iJ LOCATION 13050 4 8 Qe• A • FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED I-615- g 5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR %rtli /4' via) &aid RESPONSE RECEIVED 11-13-15- THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT bin vrE AJnett - (' C 3 S — S*r_rc'- -- ( (.o'1 CBe rns Gv/ / / be _ CCGI (r-e S s ev! /d f V /977p4 ow DATE /1 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Con. No. Epic File No. On -f5 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. /3',.i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: !, /kit:, _l k •>, (it,/ ic' / 2. Name of applicant: [./!C c.vi (4, (ht,/ � 1 f l � <<: /L, 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ?O LI,- ,S S` 4. Date checklist prepared: t— -DC /j 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): / • . C, 1 !• • ry i� 4, 6. if C elL, /r- ( I ki /t f t' 97 i- / r.-. p / c*• .S C•. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. j /'.i /f (1. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. pc.t 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. �� CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN $5.333 EPIC aq2-75° FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG reel PLNG P.W. I I FIRE ri POLICE rel P & R PROJECT of 1L'U/ loud tflota - building Perini+ LOCATION /365.0 (/1 " 0414. A. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED IS-6-15- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11-13-25- STAFF COORDINATOR J111411/ VIQJ &aid RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE // I ..5— COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Con. No . ?S -.�j Epic File No.,aQg -f5 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. /3hf A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 77; / i ;�• ��,1, 2. Name of applicant: 77./6i,,,..4? Ijrt-r (/'ctr/ /Itc /e/ p1•• 1- / 6,7<uou /� 3. Address and phone number of applicant . and contact person: f' p. l2.;- S s� 4. Date checklist prepared: ,P J- 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Lt /l , //�l� f /It l !'��// 4,',i 7�� D4".9 /t! / /e71-7- l i C.5 !/ /4 /i•r f�� /L [-i i!' `cr.! /!/ /aU �k, i/6 Tr' /• /IrrJL /" f�• 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 77' ,J ,- /. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. c CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN g5- -333 EPIC ag8 -85 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM . TO: 171 BLDG ri PLNG [Pi P.W. 1141 FIRE rei POLICE r"1 P & R PROJECT 611UKit/ (dud /rota - !icy Pi rriA LOCATION 1 3 0 5 0 U 10' OW . !Xi • FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED it "615- STAFF COORDINATOR ,V1Z4/a/ via) Beabld RESPONSE REQUESTED BY II-1345 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CI;IY.OF TUKWILA - PU3LIC •KS DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW ROUTING FORM PROJECT: LOCATION: , L 1 J - REQUESTED BY: TRANSMITTED ON: TRANSMITTED TO: PLEASE.RESPOND BY: . RESPONSE RECEIVED: 11 h _ 3 6 _ � P.W. Admin ; ; ==.' > .-------- -- -- P.W. Sewer Dept. � ,_ i P.W. Street Dept. • P.W. Water Dept. 1) Planning L ) I Fire Department Police Department Recreation Dept. Other: PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PLANS AND RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS ON THE PLAN AND THIS SHE COMMENTS: AREA OF CONCERNS: LIGHT IMO GLARE SPILL OVER FROM PROPERTY TOWARD INTERSTATE 5. MAY BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE USE OF DIRECTED LIGHTING. DEVELOPER SHOULD CONSULT WITH CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONER FOR INFORMATION ON LATEST SECURITY HARDWARE AND HOPEL/MCTEL CRIME PREVENTION TECHNIQUES. PLAN CHECK DATE: PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN . 85-323.5 EPIC aq i' FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: K1 BLDG 171 PLNG I P.W. (✓( FIRE (VI POLICE 151 P & R PROJECT 6l lU%c/ Mtti niota - BI Ate LOCATION 1305 0/04' . $0. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 4'615- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11-13-15- STAFF COORDINATOR %111i 12/ Via) &aid RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE r 9pg. Ao e .6) rkori esiedS03/7 6 O1 /410 yr" &i is in IA/d/17 v.i(J/d (17,7/ J/e COMMENTS PREPARED BY A CAF C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM (• CN g5- -333 EPIC .298 -85 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: I-71 BLDG Fel PLNG P.W. K( FIRE (VI POLICE P & R PROJECT o11 LW mow. - tad" Perri' i+ LOCATION /MO 4,/,44-04Y. "0. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED ia'6 1 S RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11-1345 STAFF COORDINATOR )'Y)D; /Q/ ViO) ikaud RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. _ITEM COMMENT (A CAO/ft&� •;16, iil A--i Ire D aSi 'i htC -17 e.ot1 G" AL D i r ��_ � � �►.�� (f vAsLfr eLk` 1 vyNA " P1- ( FRYKICV P.V2 � > C �' c)1 (a. . Di pi , 32 ( G ik. comi9 P L01\6 -TM r 15 oil. ■P i f I n \A) ti�� tt.16 L i��tl�v a h 1 t< 12/ q /as"— DATE (1(P /g_s COMMENTS PREPARED-B C.P.S. Form 11 Cont. No. Epic File No. lar2QS _f5 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. /,Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND / / / 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: de _Duey / , /1, /e� Q<��7/�oo 2. Name of applicant: 7irt wt ('/oc 7 /frdfe /- \/cab ipf fitotl/ 4 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /go, 1vt- ,2& gPiPtioPt ci 9805-2- 6 r- S 9 S7 4. Date checklist prepared: fop IN0k- --3e /9kJ� 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): q % /1 n r r� /24,/e / py W /f 7`v .JJP 'j/ il • /ate / P CS 1" '" e'n.ff, /e 4, (t k e r/, /PC/ / vi yi �, y+ /9'U 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This is 7'.. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. pot,. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 0 • • 10.. List /��/any government /approvalls or permits that will be needed for your proposal. gufftf'fk , ri[tc� /,kttY..rlo,, 7 -71f 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. / f� / / / L! Nl•f Jl'1 0 (e/ / d d /'o � _ Gf u i � aid i` �U X l,� �/ lR g7 e / 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13 oso tf s" r`' ,4 o ,r, u 7� 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? p1 d TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): lat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest sloe on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify the/m� and % note any prime farmland. 6-vv.-vet t �d j,, // y re, 't 14, t O �-r 4 c cf- PbriCr (/ Py —.ci %f bv-aw in L /a, d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. it 0 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. C► -0,40 ,4- ?.ar.ktg4e /j p f4•671- tes 3 Ok-- Qom, ,kL f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. h o g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ,c III Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally des,pribe and give approximat quantities if known. c v c 7 0/1 `1 / p l i v t a 7 4 P d c & r / /' U "-`. J`ruc lark -to 1- b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /40 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: k,d -v 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. vc d ��. • III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please, describe and attach available plans. pt,e 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ,e 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. lA 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. /4d 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Ix,/ • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. u, 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Koc -P c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. filar-, w-Q4'v- Lo t u hu&i (.4 -10 3-4v— Scow P,s f ku 74--- /10 w (^ c vPCY �k�o e Luck '44 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. cw d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:, /ori,.` efr- 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ho - P deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? n0Pt P ri 7 (ej 1si '14 Q u,. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. µ� • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to pr serve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: y�p(&- iv /6Kcsc .O/ p/o . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: uav-t birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 2ce-L4._ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. '40 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: wd ti • S Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. --- Z9%-6' b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Ace c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: yea( pu p_c 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Al 1) Describe special emergency _services that might be required. 74rr'e ponc -e 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: 11014-1› • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?_ 2?-5 rr,A4c-„ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would r� come from the site. 64.s- JJ TVUG74UV1 a �J 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 404, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? pa.,,hr' , % 71-1,-4-4c r b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Ad c. Describe any structures on the site. /1 S• Evaluation for d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? /'1— f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. 7Z74 fInCI4,(74HLQ/ If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? A /..14._ Agency Use Only h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 1149 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ,&tUt -2 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: k d K -r 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: vw- IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? uo b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Ltd..,A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: k, n,., 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Z 4(Rr bklCt & O K� b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? po,„ - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: �..� . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?. What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? j & c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ,t�wt d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ht6, -4-p, 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. l�t..v c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • • Evaluation for 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ii.o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /?co h 1- cr g i% /�%v,P, fo u 74-L - ae- IL o S /lcev, b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 2 /jc-Clcf c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ -15- • • Evaluation for 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. u b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. t.t''o' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: PI -e 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plan s, if any. // f?• C! b r`' "A- AL. - 7 c' Agency Use Only /4/34 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 2 1t/ (cr 671 xiiitrikkv2 41/e. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? �f £� — • • Evaluation for d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). j, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediat vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? f so, generally describe. Agency Use Only f. How many vehicular trips per day would b generated by the completed project? If known, i iicate when peak volumes would occur. (cc S:2 Trips y v etcy 1rr L «:/// Z..ii 9 X C'tt4Y/yy ,;7 /L ' �v.�c,ivr1 / ' /1,'1.11", 0 r ,2 3 9 Cl 2 74i7 / s aces, •: / /"t 1r) Tk P jai [ -:? / Ur.), / c' / 7v ci .7 A e: ( ( /L':1.f(Cfr'r. ./ b v fi c b v r-kr- --)14 C �:�1 //c < hi4 th,r r-y r icz / /,Ly, Proposed measures to reduce o control transpor- tation impacts, if any: n c" , g. 15. Public Services a. Would the project r-sult in an increased need for public services ( •r example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally de ribe. its b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impact on public services, if any. ,tir- -16- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). ho e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 41,, f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. GvhP,,, (oo % ,K // S-2 tors 7Pv-e6ry �er L//ki1 t i 4 96Z ccekv «i iiuvri t fIP stove/4/0g L �2o[iw or ,23 9 grtic1 �,7 _ TA�icr i QcLOV�Cr / /(' /0 7l P /Jjyzic q Pep/ o / 7vQr pSpo` 74 /(6 d1 tdhecvl et Teo."e!I .Le_ c/ /i- r A PGt, /rl P Pp r Tu b e k P 'nu o r t ctp, %!c 4 6/Q 7' tk r 7yp e foa i,,: . g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: n au -e 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. nj b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. u.c/LD • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities cur_r ttly available at thee: sy water, (efuse service, anitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity 'pwh ich might be needed. (t:41c( - C t7 L 4/ Nu7N va��i�ll/G f��la� (9�J�• S w01". -[sty o/ TvEl.14 ifehlr,P YVIGP fc�o c aset ( j 7-e( /act/cc AA -Ca !3P lI C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. � Signature: e-e Z/! // Date Submitted: v _L -_'1 r ?Y`C- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICI ID Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? el oK e excwk f //-ov SA v. Je -6,-er- 4k- /suit ,oAe Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: ew2vJ' 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? met, -f Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: cto'L.c._.., • 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? GcrP 0,47.6 4 o/ 46 lu frQ / Jc ms QC�(( -P(c4 ritf Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: /7{eu 11u",Pr 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 1f cuou /4(h (7& Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Atc.,“ -o 5. Now would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? .71 c.uc 7c4 /les Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation„for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: A0,4, How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? jlI- 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? .1 ur-r -e Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: /lest §L.41/5 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. pau- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? , a Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N,M TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI S Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. Whaj are the objecti ve(s) of the proposal? / %o 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Aa »e. bKf v /o ui% 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: 7' i Pc./(C/ • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? AID Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- 1191 lOZ 1 r1,.F4V1 4— 9P1 r- 1 111111 IL 9 --t ism -- 'e. ILt r: z EL Ev ILI II INUIT II -- -- — — — — - - --� t3 Z r -- u 1 Q Ll +144 e 4 9�151I1 I� II'AVM 441zo b j-�j �-1 —4) 447.01 IL 4,01 - ' . ti- mom c 1 IS'I 8 A sD 4- 1 ) n v L g t q0 g 'tiq rzr L UV 1 EX batfidl 4 /0 NO/ g Mgt ° 3 NhTE,OPMASilEATO JOHN ANDERSON. AND ASSOCIATES'. ',P8 INC 10620 N.E. 6m , .. Mimi i wauogte EOM