The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-30-88 - MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS / HEIDECKE MARK - PVC CONDUITMCI TELECOMMUNICATION- SEATTLE TERMINAL TO KENT JUNCTION FIBER OPTIC CABLE I -5 & HWY 405 ACROSS DUWAMISH & GREEN RIVER SHORELANDS EPIC 30 -88 jmETRD-' Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 "- December 14, 1988 DEC 19 1988 Rick Beeler, Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Non - Significance File No.: EPIC -30 -88 MCI Telecommunication Corporation Dear Mr. Beeler: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:plg A F F JOANNE JOHNSON AVIT OF DISTRI•UTION [[ Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet [j Short Subdivision Agenda Packet hereby declare that: Determination of Nonsignificance Ea Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action 0 Official Notice Q Notice of Application for E] Other Shoreline Management Permit E] Shoreline Management Permit C1 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, DECEMBER 1,1988 , 19 SEE ATTACHED AND WASHINGTON -STATE DEPT OF FISHERIES 115 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING OLYMPIA, WA 98504 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAIL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BEATTY Name of Project MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS File Number EPIC -30 -88 King County 500 4th Avenue Seattle,'WA 98133 Black River Quarry, Inc. 6806 S. 140th Seattle, WA 98187 Burnard Sanft 5030 25th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Raymond Neilsen 5108 S. 163rd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle Metro - 821 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Pat Box 10636 Main Street #303 Bellevue, WA 98004 Adolp Sanft Container Corp c/o Seattle Barrel Co. Box 42 4716 Airport Way S. Renton 98108 Seattle, WA 98108 BNSF Burlington Northern RR Property Tax Dept. 777 Main St. #2680 Fort Worth, TX 76102 L.P. & Mary Ellen Hughes 8865 Overtake Dr. Bellevue, WA 98004 Eland Development Co. P.O. Box 80187 Seattle, WA 98108 Manufacturers Mineral Co. 1215 Monster Rd. Renton, WA 98055 City of Seattle 821 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Jacob Nielsen 1602 Monster Road SW Renton, WA 98055 John C. & Carol D. Radovich 2000 124th NE B103 Bellevue, WA 98005 An Marco 9125 10th S. Seattle, WA 98108 Americ City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Best Way Motor Freight, Inc P.O. Box 80187 Seattle, WA 98108 Schober Enterprises, Inc. 1800 Monster Road SW Renton, WA 98055 J.D. Fiorito & E.J. Ferull 1100 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 Eva Miller 783 Mayfield Ave. Stawford, CA 94305 Container Corp. of America P.O. Box 429 Renton, WA 98057 WAC 197 -11 -970 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal INSTALL A 2" PVC CONDUIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS WITHIN UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY. CONDUIT UNDER.THE BLACK RIVER WILL BE INSTALLED PER DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES. Proponent MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Location of Proposal, including street address, if any BLACK RIVER CROSSING OF THE U.P.R.R. IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 14, TWN 23; RANGE 4. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -30 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS Et This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by The lead agency will not act on this DECEMBER 16, 1988 proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukw Date Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS RE: TELEPHONE MEMO A4 c CA-3 L-2 c/ oSS /n/G o6 /3C./+cr VOQ PERSON CONTACTED: ■O %Z.O P Lc) AeP7 OF PERSON CALLING: �- orG,J (/j ri u °"-`" Frs 6((e-5 DATE: ((/ Q /58 INFORMATION ITEMS: C ,.173- 4CTe:A ZT k cr2CA /a( /88. (h 6'1c7-8-KS rALK- Cor. M cr 77q6 fe-44t4 I 7: S S �4 71S / / 7 77(-71-7" 7W ?'- c.J r C. M 7 H-/5 e - Q u i le C-M E K 73' p o g- peke-icy rs S UB9 -a1/4t C E r Pux-SuR T' Ta !PO /M CS A-Gie_e ue7\1-7s. 4) As K e'er le- - 7 cD cock cT M O (F 7-rge72e- f/L,Gr S(Gtv-( Frc,4/\!?" coM pt./ Csr-T <cv,CS. CITY OF TUKWILA • PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM • TO: 0 BLDG. J PLNG. CONTROL NUMBER P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE [[ P. & R. PROJECT MCI SEATTLE TERMINAL TO KENT JUNCTION - PROJECT NO. 06009 ADDRESS BETWEEN I -5 AND 405 ALONG THE UNION PACIFIC AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY ROW. DATE TRANSMITTED NOVEMBER 21, 1988 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: H -'guU> G Scc -.p>~. 161 L~t A $1- flit -c Ora rX►-splv4r. [[ Ft('t-U c,`-uos. -1 "C - b iz Pu rA '( Ric),_115 L(c, S , ct-t \O w14-1 s , r c 3 (F-L(T R \- -)1 sT n- r1NO•0\ 13 tvn . FuTo Il�� , (g �� ^ S r . w c rt-I C1,5 , SPf 11 Ko. f-161 N614 VC_ 1] t\t7 -- -=4vi lc 1 l 5Sn 11,1T(-) G-) l \ 1 E ?■ (_ – TIVOL— Su vrw f -i Q Ct v4.►S Q .Q Q Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [[ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED J PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER CENTRAL PER TEM - ROUTING FORM TO: [J BLDG. [[ PLNG. P.W. [-=[ [[ FIRE ❑ POLICE pl P. & R. PROJECT MCI SEATTLE TERMINAL TO KENT JUNCTION - PROJECT NO. 06009 ADDRESS BETWEEN I -5 AND 405 ALONG THE UNION PACIFIC AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY ROW. DATE TRANSMITTED NOVEMBER 21, 1988 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [j PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ PLAN APPROVED PLAN CHECK DATE / / /Z./ COMMENTS PREPARED BY 6rr C.P.S. FORM 2 ,CITY OF TUKWILA • PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: ]I BLDG. [[ PLNG. P.W. [l FIRE [] POLICE Q P. & R. PROJECT MCI SEATTLE TERMINAL TO KENT JUNCTION - PROJECT NQ. 06009 ADDRESS BETWEEN I -5 AND 405 ALONG THE UNION PACIFIC AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY ROW. DATE TRANSMITTED NOVEMBER 21, 1988 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CON ERN IS NOTED: 0- po El a a a El D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [l PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED [[ PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY 1/ 4h C.P.S. FORM 2 G. E. RALEIGH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Facilities Location Consultants P.O. BOX 25247 (503) 626 -6656 8118 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 BEAVERTON, OREGON --- 97005 November 15, 1988 City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Ms Moira Carr Bradshaw, Senior Planner Subject: MCI Telecommunications Corporation City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Master Program Substantial Development Permit Application Dear Ms Bradshaw: 'NOV 17 1988 1 Pursuant to our conversation on November 7, enclosed herewith is a Letter of Authorization from the Union Pacific Railroad Company which authorizes MCI's preliminary work on the fiber optic cable project.. Also enclosed are copies revised Site Plans showing a relocation of the cable from the Burlington Northern Railroad Company right -of -way to the Union Pacific Railroad Company right -of -way in the Green River Shoreline Environment. Lastly, pursuant to WAC 197- 11- 800(24Xa), WAC 197 -11 -305 and WAC 197 -11 -908 and King County Code, this project is exempted from the SEPA requirements within the jurisdiction of King County. Therefore, the City of Tukwila should begin its independent SEPA determination. Any assistance that you can give in expediting the evaluation and processing of this permit would be appreciated. If you require any further information or data, please contact me by phone at (503) 626 -6656. Please address any correspondence to me at: G. E. RALEIGH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. P. 0. Box 25247 Portland, Oregon 97225 Sincerely, G. E. RALEIGH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. i * Z / c2/12——Z �� Mark R. Heidecke Permit Agent MRH /sdh enclosures Project Management • Environmental • Surveying • Mapping • Right -of -Way [y. 1N1 Iv a. -h IAS "RACKS IrJOI -,aL. Nt r ie. _. aADE r_'f.KLuNTgVy I1• Im NN4 fdTNfAaT Rl444441sa NKr, OItw.MNy 141414 01111CR NARK GRd:S SE -TION A kLE VEITT:1• =io' 1-1n41 . 1,2D. DUICCT DUIII[D CONDUIT. 1cnG M E• • lL CANE E ARKEU uuu ,- -- TArC • coon 4CONDUTANL 1.51/4 CAADE ORAL L. G: BORE PROFILE 40 ' 0041'1144 GUUN. O'VSTN44.0WD SITE PLAN ELK I "A NW' Alb VKvs 1,U4L4 1h W411 WAR .1 P1iCC .' 0u 41 Y. 24 ks_PROPeSED P1EEA erne. UOIt CPD SEGTIDN B scA.-E VERT:I'.a0' NWC -1.10 s vn s� re • POWA.MINH FIVER -G-11y pF TUKANLA N0.1 SvMMARY THE IN•TAA.LATION OF A L:VRIED FILM' OPT.L CAOLG ENTERS AN AAEJ1 DitIGNATC4 AS AN •URDAN ENVIRONMENT SNORE-.1O' PvRt. ANT TO Toe • KING CJVNTY SNORE L.N. M MENT PROA.AI'a; • A•PROVE➢ MAY 2, 1110. LAM v•f 1s NANU•ALTURIN4,1AININ4 AND • • QVARtY, VA[AJT INOVt1 RII.l ww1 WAX 01.1S INA. • tZlirat 2 Gu W i s c NSR x4DRM6 2. tUnT vt. SI e2 Fes:meo Y RI Rev.SED 11- 111-BA 7;f_A. 1h{-80 bra /00, ATTACHMENT C. KoR6ED Flag cer LOP.' -E Ler.AIIDN Al2' OUWAMI51-1 RNER 5110PEe,t& G1T1 ..F TuFWLA AEG tL I TtON V4 e. r1 WM ave. CO.NTy1VVA. HALT I DE 2 [MG. ID .. 11 -4.R 2 OLECAI.TIOM LEGEND I 0G w 1nN1Lv :7 NOV 17 1988 �-LANNiNG CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Application No 6--P 1 G- 3o- 8 8 A. BACK6ROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: MCI Seattle Terminal to Kent Junction Project No. 06009 2. Name of applicant: MCI Telecommunications Corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: MCI Telecommunications Corporation 400 International Parkway Richardson, Texas 75081 Contact: Mr. Mark Heidecke G. E. Raleigh and Associates. Inc. P. 0. Box 25247 Portland, Oregon 97225 (503) 626 -6656 4. Date checklist prepared: November 7, 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction activities will be completed within one month after issuance of permits. Completion of all construciinon activities is scheduled for Spring, 1989. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. This proposal is a portion of MCI's Seattle Area Upgrade program. This program is part of MCI's nationwide micro -wave and fiber optic telecommunication network. Completion of the network is scheduled for completion within 2 to 3 years. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. U. S. Sprint Communications Company submitted an Environmental Checklist for a fiber optic cable installation within the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way adjacent to the Duwamish River Shoreline Management Areas as part of the application for City of Tukwila Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit No. 87 -5 -SMP with a Determination of Non - significance dated August 12, 1987. Page 1 • • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly relating to the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. Although no applications are known to be pending at this time, U. S. Sprint Communications Company and AT &T Communications of the Northwest received Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits and Hydraulic Project. Approvals for fiber optic cable installations within the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way adjacent to the Duwamish River Shoreline Management Areas. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. In addition to the City of Tukwila, MCI will submit applications to other jurisdictions for those areas requiring Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits. MCI will submit. Hydraulic Project Applications for those stream crossings requiring approval under RCW 75.20.100 and Ch. 220 -110 WAC to the Washington Department of Fisheries. Work within the waters under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is authorized under a Nationwide Permit for utility lines (Department of the Army Regulations dated November 13, 1986; paragraph 330.5(aX 12).) 11. Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The purpose of this project is to make available a high quality long distance voice and data communication transmission system to the Seattle Area. Fiber optics utilitizes laser technology and digital transmission. This project is part of a nationwide telecommunication network being constructed by MCI Telecommunications Corporation and is vital to the continuity of the overall communications network owned by MCI. The cable will be constructed underground and located entirely within the Union Pacific Railroad Company and Burlington Northern Railroad Company rights-of-way within the City of Tukwila under permits to be issued by the appropriate railroad. This location provides the most direct route from downtown Seattle to MCI's Kent Junction micro -wave site. Due to the geography of King County, in particular the Green /Duwamish River Basin, the existing railroad rights -of -way cross Shoreline Environments. The cable location was coordinated with the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Burlington Northern Railroad and is fully compatible with the current railroad uses and the location of other utilities and facilities located within the railroad rights-of-way. Project construction will utilize plowing, trenching, boring and bridge attachment. In plowing, a crawler will be used for direct burial of a 3/4 inch diameter fiber optic cable encased within one of two 2 inch diameter plowable P.V.C. conduits. The cable will be placed with a minimum of 42 inches of cover. In trenching, a backhoe or trencher will excavate a one foot wide trench for direct placement of the cable or encasement of the cable within one of two 2 inch P.V.C. conduits. The P.V.C. conduits will be encased in concrete to provide further protection to the cable in those areas which are likely to have future sub - surface disturbance. The conduits will have a minimum of 42 inches of cover. The boring process for fiber optic cable placement involves boring machine installation of a 4 -inch diameter Black Iron Pipe to contain the P.V.C. conduits which encase the 3/4 inch diameter fiber optic cable. In bridge attachment, a 4 -inch diameter galvanized iron pipe, which encases the 3/4 inch fiber optic cable within one of two R.V.C. conduits, is attached to existing bridges. The cable will be buried at a minimum of 60 inches below the bottom of all streams requiring an underwater installation. Page 2 • • A warning marker ribbon will be placed directly above the cable and 12 inches below the surface. The cable is wrapped with a locator filament, locatable by a M Scope attached to the cable at handholes located approximately 2000 feet apart along the cable route. Route locator /warning signs will be placed at regular intervals along the cable route. Post - construction contours will match in situ contours. Extracted native materials will be replaced back into the ditch or trench after placement of the conduit. When required by the governing body, extracted materials will be disposed of in an area designated by the governing body. Replacement fill, when required by the governing body, will be of a type and from a source designated and /or approved by the governing body. MCI will protect trees, plantings, grass, asphalt and concrete surfaces, irrigation facilities, drainage structures, and existing utilities during construction. The work sites will be restored to as good or better condition than as found before construction. MCI will exercise sound construction and erosion control practices. Construction techniques will be used that minimize the amount of disturbance to the adjacent roadbeds and properties, thus reducing the chance of construction related erosion. All locations of erosion control structures and mitigation will be guided by the type of soil, amount and type of ground cover, terrain, and proximity to water bodies. The trench will be backfilled immediately after placement of the conduit. Hydro - seeding will be utilized in appropriate areas or as directed by the governing body. The Black River and tributaries to Springbrook Creek will require underwater burial of the conduit. MCI will utilize two track mounted excavators working in tandem on opposite banks to dig a two foot wide trench from bank to bank. It is estimated that a maximum of 2 hours will be utilized to excavate the trench and install the conduit at the Black River. Another two hours will be utilized for clean -up activities and placement of rip -rap. Rock will be placed as rlp -rap on the stream bank for erosion control. Additionally, the area will be hydro - seeded as an additional erosion control measure. This project is consistent with the applicable City of Tukwila Municipal Code General Requirements TMC 18.60.050 (1 thru 5) and TMC 18.60.060 (OA thru F). 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a large area, provide the boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. See Table 1 and the attached vicinity maps. Page 3 entown •:.N 1- • imi. -` ■ •S IN' • 1 1 • :t ► • . 3M i::11 DUWAMISH RIVER-CITY OF TUKWILA NO. I ci P own , _ .Q . — - - -- `1�c:c .liver \ \� .1,� River .� i • • • FOS • L • iSch 19 .011 • • .3C • -•1 tl V1611\11TY GREEN RIVER CITY OF TUKWILA NO. 2 • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat. rolling. hilly. steep slopes. mountainous. other. The project route follows railroad rights -of -way through the City of Tukwila. See Table 2. b. What Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent. slope)? See Table 2. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. clay. sand gravel. peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. Alluvial and glacial soil overlayed by crushed rock and dirt (roadbed and railroad bed materials). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. None of these sites show any history of soil instablility. e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of flit. Small quantities of non - native backfill material may be required to meet applicable construction codes at the approaches to bridges or when within road rights-of -way. This non - native fill will be compacted and graded to approximate the pre - existing grade. When required by the governing body. extracted materials will be disposed of in an area designated by the governing body. Replacement fill, when required by the governing body, will be of a type and from a source designated and /or approved by the governing body. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? if so. generally describe. There is a slight chance of construction related erosion occurring at the Black River crossing adjacent to the Duwamish River Shoreline Area. The cable is to be buried under the Black River at this location. The stream banks are at an approximate 45 per cent. grade. After installation. the cable location will be hydro - seeded with an appropriate seed mixture and /or rip - rapped with rock taken from the adjacent quarry site. Page 4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only The cable route lies within and along a railroad bed. These grades are relatively flat and therefore are not susceptible to erosion. In those shoreline management or other sensitive environmental areas which have pre - existing vegetation, the areas disturbed during construction will hydro- seeded with a compatible seed mixture. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 2 percent of the project will require restoration of roadbed surfaces (e.g. concrete or asphalt) due to roadbed crossings. Not applicable while within the Union Pacific or BNRR rights -of -way. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: Construction techniques will be utilized that minimize the amount of disturbance of the adjacent roadbeds and railroad beds and thus reduce the amount of construction related erosion. Appropriate erosion control structures will be utilized in the trench in areas exceeding 10 percent grade. In those shoreline management or other sensitive environmental areas which have pre - existing vegetation, the areas disturbed during construction will be hydro - seeded with a compatible seed mixture. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, Industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Project construction will result in short -term. temporary emissions from gas- and diesel - powered construction equipment. Short -term, temporary increases in airborne dust will also occur during project construction. The project will not create emissions or odor once construction has been completed. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Existing off -site sources include automobile and truck traffic on adjacent roadways, train traffic on the railroad rights -of -way, and light industries on adjacent properties. These sources will not affect the proposed project during construction or operation. Page 5 • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams. saltwater. lakes. ponds. wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. See Table 3. 2) Will the project require any work over. In. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plsns. Sites Tukwila No. 1 & No. 2 are within 200 feet of the surface water bodies described in Table 3, and shown on the attached site plans. The Black River will require underwater burial of the conduit. MCI will utilize two track mounted excavators working in tandem on opposite banks to dig a two foot wide trench from bank to bank. It is estimated that a maximum of 2 hours will be utilized to excavate the trench and install the conduit at the Black River. Another two hours will be utilized for clean -up activities and placement of rip -rap. Rock will be placed as rip - rap on the stream bank for erosion control. Additionally, the area will be hydro - seeded as an additional erosion control measure. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of the fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description. purpose. and approximate quantities. if known. This proposal will not require any withdrawal or diversion of surface water. Page 6 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 5) Does the proposal lie within s 100 -year floodplain? If so. note location on the site plan. All of the proposed sites, excepting the Black River crossing, lie within the 100 -year floodplain. However, construction will take place only on elevated roadbeds, railroad beds, and bridges. These locations appear to be above the 100 -year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve say discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This proposal does not involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Oround: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose. and approximate quantities. if known. There will be no withdrawal of , or discharge to, ground water. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. if any (for exmaple: Domestic sewage: industrial; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system. the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe. Current sources of runoff include unknown quantities of rainfall and runoff from adjacent roadbeds and railroad beds. No permanent alteration of existing collection or disposal methods will occur; no additional collection or disposal facilities will be required as the result of this project. Page 7 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. Waste materials will not enter surface or ground waters during normal construciion or operations. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground. and runoff water impacts, if any: There will be no significant or long term adverse impacts to water quality as a result of this project. There will be some increased turbidity associated with installation of the conduit beneath the Black River. These increases will be localized, of short duration, and have very low levels of increase in turbidity. It is expected that the method of conduit installation will have minimal or no impact upon the aquatic community, including anadromous salamids, in or adjacent to the project. area. Erosion control measures will be implemented to avoid impacts to water quality and erosion control vegetation meaures (seeding and planting) will immediately follow construction to avoid post construction erosion and sedimentation. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder. maple. cottonwood, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine. hemlock, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup, skunk cabbage. others water plants: water lily, eelgrass. milfoil, other other types of vegetation See Table 4. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? At all sites there will be smell amounts of vegetation removed or altered during construction. This vegetation will generally be grasses and small shrubs from the railroad rights -of -way. Trees, plantings, and grass will be protected to the greatest possible extent during construction. It is anticipated that the disturbed areas will revegetate within a short period of time Page 8 • • and that no permanent changes in vegetation type and /or quantity will occur. Those shoreline management or other sensitive environmental areas which have pre - existing vegetation and which are susceptible to erosion will be hydro -' seeded with an appropriate seed mixture. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered plant species in the vicinity of the shoreline management or other environmentally sensitive areas crossed by this protect. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds. other mammals: deer. bear, elk. beaver. other fish: bass. salmon. trout. herring. shellfish. other See Table S. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered animal species in the vicinity of the shoreline management or other environmentally sensitive areas crossed by this project. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. Sites Tukwila No. 1 & No. 2 are adjacent to the migration route of anadromous salmonlds. It is likely that migratory waterfowl use the Green and Duwamish Rivers as migration corridors. It. Is expected that the method of conduit installation will have minimal or no impact upon the aquatic community, including anadromous salamids, in or adjacent to the project area. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural ga% oil. wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe Page 9 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • whether it will be used for heating. manufacturing. etc. Not applicable. The project will not require use of energy or natural resources during operation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. Not applicable. Project will not affect potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: Not applicable. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur es a result of this proposal? If so. describe. Not applicable. 1) Describe special emergencey services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any. Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment. operation. other)? Existing off -site sources include automobile and truck traffic on adjacent roadways, train traffic on the railroad right -of -way, and light industries on adjacent properties. These sources will not affect the proposed project during construction of operation. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic. Page 10 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment will cause short -term, temporary increases in noise levels during cable laying efforts. Project - related increases in noise levels are not expected to be significant relative to existing background noise levels. Noise will be generated during daylight working hours (typically 0700 to 1800 hours). Once construction is completed, the proposed project will not result in increased noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, measures have not been proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use or control noise therefore mitigation a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The cable will be placed along existing railroad rights -of -way or roadways. Land and shoreline uses in areas immediately adjacent to the shoreline and environmentally sensitive areas crossed by the project are summarized In Table 6. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No evidence of agricultural use of the proposed railroad and road rights - of-way. There is no evidence of agricultural uses on land in the immediate vicinity of shoreline or environmentally sensitive areas crossed by the project. c. Describe any structures on the site. Bridges or box culverts (concrete or steel) are located in the vicinity of each of the sites. Other structures in the immediate vicinity are typical related to land uses noted in Table 8, and include residences, commercial structures, and • industrial structures. d. Will any structures be demolished/ if so. what. None. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? See Table 7. Page 11 Evaluation for Agency Use Only f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Comprehensive Plan designations are the same as those indicated for zoning classifications (above). If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? See Table 6. h. Has any part of the site been classified as in 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so. specify. See Table 9. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? J. None. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any? No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: The proposed project will be located entirely within existing railroad and road rights-of -way, and is considered an allowable use under zoning regulations for these areas. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high. middle. or low- income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units. if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle. or low - income housing. Not applicable. Page 12 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Small numbers of existing vegetation at some shoreline management area crossings and areas throughout the proposed cable route will be temporarily disturbed, resulting in short - term aesthetic impacts. No long -term alteration of existing aesthetic conditions will occur as a result of this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 11. Light and Mare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing sources of light and glare include automobile and truck traffic on adjacent roadways. These sources will not affect construction or operation of the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. Page 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate area? Shoreline management area crossing Tukwila No. 1 is located in the vicinity of Foster Golf Course, a designated recreational use. The crossings at Tukwila No. 1 & No. 2 are located immediately north and south, respectively, of Fort Dent Park. Potential opportunities for informal fishing exist at all water crossings. Opportunities for swimming and boating exist at these locations as well. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for. national. state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. Results of U. S. Sprints assessment in King County indicate that most of the cable route follows a railroad right -of -way where previous disturbance has resulted in a very low probability of intact cultural deposits. No significant sites were considered close enough to the cable route for any mitigation measures including archeological monitoring of cable installation. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological. scientific. or cultural Importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. Page 14 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 14. Transportation Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. See Table 10. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit. stop? Public transit service does not exist directly to the shoreline management area crossings. but is available (via METRO bus lines) at distances ranging from 1/2 to 2 miles away from the crossings. c. How many parting spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets. not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. The proposed project will not require use of water, rail, or air transportation. The proposed shoreline management area crossings do not occur in areas used for water transportation. Shoreline managment area crossings, Tukwila No. 1 & No. 2, are located approximately 5 miles east of Seattle - Tacoma International Airport. (SeaTac), 3.5 miles south of King County International Airport (Boeing Field), and 3 miles west of the Renton Municpal Airport. . The Burlington Northern and Union Pacific (formerly Milwaukie Road) railroad lines are located immediately adjacent to Tukwila No.1 & No. 2 crossings. Page 15 . • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. 9- The completed project will not generate vehicular traffic on a daily basis. Occassional traffic may be generated on an infrequent basis in the event of cable repairs or during surveys to verify cable location prior to construction in the area. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. None. b. Proposed measures to reduce of control direct impacts on public services, if any. No significant impacts are anticipated, therefore mitigation measures have not been proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas. water. refuse service. telephone. sanitary sewer. septic system. other. In general, utility services such as power, water, and telephone are available in the immediate vicinity of all shoreline management area crossings. Service hook -ups have not been extended directly to shoreline management area crossing locations, since they occur along rights -of -way rather than specific parcels of land proposed for development. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities off the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. Page 16 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • c. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature- Date Submitted- Page 17 Evaluation for Agency Use Only TABLE 1 LOCATION OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) JURISDICTION LOCATION ADJACENT STREET Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) City of Tukwila SE1 /4 SE /4, Sec. 14 T23N. R4E City of Tukwila SW /4 NW /4, Sec. 24 T23N, R4E Monster Road Monster Road TABLE 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TERRAIN, SLOPE AND SOIL STABILITY AT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING TERRAIN (AREA NUMBER) SLOPE STREAM BANK SLOPE STEEPEST SOIL SLOPE INSTABILITY (PERCENT) (TYPE) Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) Flat Flat. Moderate Gradual 45 5 None None Page 15 • • TABLE 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF SURFACE WATER BODIES NEAR SHORELINE AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ESTIMATED MEAN PROJECT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ANNUAL CROSSING MAINSTREAM AREA CROSSING LENGTH DRAINAGE DISCHARGE LOCATION RIVER" (AREA NUMBER) (MILES) (SQ MILES) (CU FT /S) (RIVER MILE) (RIVER MILE) Duwamish River 94 440 1,520 9.5 -12.0 Puget Sound (Tukwila No. 1) Green River 94 440 1,520 12.0 Duwamish R. (Tukwila No. 2) (11) This column indicates the larger river to which the shoreline management area river /stream is a tributary, and the river mile at which it enters. Source: Washington State Dept. of Fisheries Stream Catalog (1977) USGS Water Resources Data (1984) Page 19 TABLE 4 PLANTS KNOWN TO OCCUR IN THE VICINITY OF SHORELINE MANAGMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN WET SOIL WATER OTHER (AREA NUMBER) TREES TREES PLANTS PLANTS VEGETATION Duwamish River Maple Shrubs (Tukwila No. 1) Cottonwood Blackberry Green River — Blackberry (Tukwila No. 2) -- Indicates not observed. Page 20 TABLE 5 ANIMALS KNOWN TO OR LIKELY TO OCCUR IN THE VICINITY OF SHORELINE MANAGMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) BIRDS MAMMALS FISH Duwamish River . Songbirds Chinook Salmon (Tukwila No. 1) Coho Salmon Chum Salmon Steelhead Trout Green River Songbirds Chinook Salmon (Tukwila No. 2) Coho Salmon Chum Salmon Steelhead Trout -- Indicates not likely to occur. • TABLE 6 LAND AND SHORELINE USE ADJACENT TO SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) ADJACENT LAND AND SHORELINE USE Duwamish River industrial (Tukwila No. 1) Green River industrial (Tukwila No. 2) TABLE 7 ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS AT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) ZONING CLASSIFICATION Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) M1: light industrial M1: light industrial • • TABLE 6 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT DESIGNATIONS FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) SHORELINE MANAGEMENT DESIGNATION Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) Urban Urban TABLE 9 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DESIGNATIONS AT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA DESIGNATION Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) 'Special development considerations" (review for shoreline management criteria) "Special development considerations' (review for shoreline management criteria) Page 23 • TABLE 10 STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADJACENT TO SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSINGS FOR MCI ROUTE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA CROSSING (AREA NUMBER) ADJACENT STREETS AND HIGHWAYS Duwamish River (Tukwila No. 1) Green River (Tukwila No. 2) Monster Road, 72nd Avenue S. Monster Road, 72nd Avenue S. e y t .{: WW 1WK# S(u.P•) 126' 1T' CYIbOG sAis e — °• LAST TWAY -5 ImK044 30.ITHeArr cNJ•MISH RIVER oRDINRRy HY4 YATeR IMRK! 6RO55 SECTION A GALE VERT:1 " °10 HOP I• "?D' TYrICAL DETAIL;_ DIRECT BUILD CODDtJIT. . E%ISifq if. YIN. °flow KIYUY neal COO. ORAO4 2`I EpSTfW DUDE C -PAL 1rY.l L.o 40' BORE PROFILE uAOLE YAIIPrR lAI'E • CONDUIT SITE PILN zue, I "Imo' DIReaT PvTICo Cn.WIT &Z 4 PLAcf c• DVa 14 13 2 24 tAttni tjV eN°anO.P'fieOfeL a m ,SRY v �t1' � E• �„nW ,gmDE ressreo eri t It`LVCP°SlD FIDeR CMG Uar C POSS SEGf ION B SLALE vERT: 1 - -IO' HOE :1'•10' \/IC N U MAP ` gym' UUWAMISH F VER -CITY of TUKWILp 4O.1 •VMMANY -1 He I U-Af 0M OF A AJ RIae fleaw 0PTIG CADLC ENTGPS AM AP ILA Da,14r.ATea AS AN "V10A4 AP%J%*ONM•NT SYCRt.INt PVROJAHT TO 141 • r04 CVVNTT SIIRRRLWe t J&tPMtNT PRRCRAN7 ,PRO VPA MAT LI 111tl. LAN° u11 1• MANVPALTVRIN4,MIHISA A411 OV•P11.4, VACANT I4OVS7PIAL, "NI M•RCNOVSIN4. LA Fc J1 SED FIFER GPM C661 -E 1.ZATIOti1 r ALWh DU At11514 RNER 51- RELAND; .l0' IS T 04H 12.4C W.M. I CI1G Lowry l t•M. 110040 rNen 1 or 2 I .0 PO. ID t� u P }}f 7..{{ 27' hRTRKK II t 1Th 12' 12' '7\ • GNEEN RIVER 0110144 -1j 444.141 Ico..,. 5o4TNRAer ,�:tATOM MARK GR05 SECTION jALE VERT: l - c HaR : f'7D Iy�cni nETAIJ. INSECT BURIED CONDUIT. : . D na rYlur Lt • u■ COVER 11' INK. 1LOW 1 I1R111 DRAW E215T414 GRADE tL'D.L LC GI BORE PROFILE ED CABLE YARNED TAPE LC PI OWARIL CONDUIT 23 24— 4PD mink M fILIEMEI mama. Mt" i`1 1 LVATVK FLLt7 M*PONAP NtL7t PIMPLY 0. MGR!' of t al/ WI• Dp FRSVPCO'P TI LNSINW PjTaI. SITE PLAki 'u E• 1Y612' ^ ✓R4E%T MQUUD LON1 4. 11 U (j.MG IN 14ACL' iP (ari4 VIC j :i_MAP — '4.IC- I..2�y' CCREeN RIV4. - •IT`/ OFTUK'IILA 140.2 SUMMARY T11G INSTALLATION OF •••• DJRIG.D FRSGR OPTIC CADLG, LMTII11a AN ARGA DEt4LN TCD At AN"VODA.J DNVIRONMGNT LNOPRLININ PUPSUANT TO TN! 'KING LOJNTT 500REL•NY MANALGMINT PIASTCR PROGRAM ;aenOIGD HAI 1, 117E. LAND •GG 144 WAIRNOUII•G AND sTOPALE. VACANT. - ._..._.._.. WDJ41RIAL/COMMGRCINL, MANJP.LTJ It 04 AND SGWALL TREATMINT, AV17. =H1 1: 11-T • DPUt4 J.N /DpL 11-.40 .07444 Ir'I -DO n %fiJ7:? D.NA sa • • SG.. OLSLwTDN I *T1 l 1120W -17 FlE€R OPTLr GL+6LE. LOCATION . C 9 4REEN RIv2 I1,9RE1 NDh ,cc.2A 7-2,N• R.40. W -N., 01.44. muYTY, 4M.. D LEGEND 0166,511 +ANN wErt 2 Dr 2 I Olga NO 1 SEATTLE TERMINAL. 5TH a COLUMBIA 1 L AKE F•ben Py MERCER ISLAND WASHINOION PONTOON ORInQ Otaw Span AAA :i • . :area I ilc:airull Island MCI ROUTE MAP SH10F3 '11 !J-1l,1 \ reP•011, SEATTLE JUNCTION • • SHORELINE AREA PHOTOGRAPHS TUKWILA N0. 1 Photo No. 1) 200 feet south of Black River (Sprint crossing) looking north 2) South bank Black River looking north 3) North bank Black River looking south 4) North bank looking north 5) North bank looking southwest 6) South edge shoreline area looking north 7) North edge shoreline area looking south 8) North edge shoreline area looking southwest TUKWILA NO. 2 9) North edge shoreline area looking south 10) Metro Sewer crossing looking north 11) Metro Sewer crossing looking south 12) South edge shoreline area looking north PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 PHOTO 3 PHOTO 4 Photo 5 Photo 6 --• -4 4 Photo 7 Photo 8 Photo 9 Photo 10 Photo 11 Photo 12 TYPICAL" =DETAIL'= '`' DIRECT. BURIED' CONDUIT Li PRr 1GSE - MI: t P I is _"'rt' .1E-E 4?P erc,a 4 :J: ^. .tieu ; 11' cc K11J 7 • xz1THr� sT 12' MIN. 4-2 • BELOW MINIMUM` FINISH 'COVEfl '-ONADE CABLE PARKER TAPE • Lsr PLOWABLE, CONDUIT . (;UUJC.hll Sri RI VER OF•LIIt4 V,Y N16'- ',;IT i• MARY.; E TION:_A tpfi t.111J R\t'F:fiPDS EC: FIBEK Ci'T K- GABLE S'MR.; .. .. . THE IN= TALLATION OF A 1?••)R:EL:FICER OPTrL GAP.L6 ENT •. .A LE Lily- +'TE.D. An qN 'uge AIJ EWVIR:),I MERIT SHCAa..UJa•' F'V n!>U a,NT SHE °KIN:; C..t'NTY ..:+0 `aC _.i.'.:.. T ,.:-C' i`•�E �+ - +R Ois2.�N'� I1r %�; i• -v vli :NMi : '�'j. tiHNL 'JS� 1'= �'�h N`�oIAC T•�hNJE� MerJlw la .win :OA VAC I:VT iN ^:�., •a�r.�_ a. <� o: ARC'. CLy4.,. L ALL Ur.AllLTbnFi WILL. tE 6!d4 FILL EED. AND GiNpp?GTED TD THE D9.511-y • SVRD.OVIJ(AtJy 5l71L• 4E.+C pc, .'..0 -4-2A O+TT li. V kPPAOVED O APPROVE1BI il.scanamourtais CGFPO114TI014 rFOfO ED 1'IVN 7' Y/.W �{� ✓�. W(T 1 �O'v. Awn .GUW01151 RIVER 5171012`ELM rri .'F •'NKwIL•C. . SYMBOLI - DESCRIPTION LEGEND' SHEET t OF 2 I DWG NO. ID