Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-30-91 - HUNT JOHN - US WEST EQUIPMENT BUILDING AND ANTENNACELL SITE (U.S. WEST) EQUIPMENT BUILDING & ANTENNAE 13130 44T" AVE. SOUTH EPIC 30 -91 s AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING The undersigned, on behalf of U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc. commits that Corporation to the following: As a condition of the approval of a Conditional Use Permit 91 -3 -CUP and associated building permits by the City of Tukwila for a cellular telephone antenna site, the City of Tukwila has required the installation of landscaping, as shown on the attached plans, sheets L -1 and L -2, dated 9 -10 -91 by Richard Ward Associates. The City of Tukwila further requires the commitment of U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc, their successors or assigns in operation of the facility as approved, to a schedule of regular inspection and maintenance of the described landscaping once installed, for the life of the permit and use, according to the documents attached hereto titled "IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES - " and "LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES - U S WEST NewVector, Riverton, Tukwila Site ". The undersigned further binds the Corporation for the life of said permits to annual inspection of the landscaping in the fall of each year, and to accomplish the removal and replacement of any dead or dying plants discovered in such inspections by March of the following year, or within the nearest such period as will optimize the likelihood of survival of such replacement plants. Responsibility for the performance of the maintenance, inspection and maintenance schedules described above and attached hereto shall be with the U S WEST NewVector Group, Seattle MSA Field Operations Division, 6901 West Marginal Way Southwest, Seattle 98106. Currently, the maintenance supervisor for at that facility is Mr. Glen Page, Telephone # 762 -0256. The Corporation shall in a timely manner inform the Tukwila Planning Department of any reassignment of Divisional responsibility for this performance, any subcontractor's names and phone numbers, and any change in phone number for the responsible Division or person. Assistance in assuring timely performance may also be obtained by contacting the Corporation's Northwest Regional Manager for Real Estate, currently Mr. Ron Smith, at 450 -8100, or at Post Office Box 91211, Bellevue, WA 98009 -2211. The Corporation understands that repeated failure to perform this maintenance and replacement shall subject them to revocation by the City of Tukwila of 91 -3 -CUP, under the procedures and subject to the penalties prescribed therefor by the City of Tukwila Zoning Code, Section 18.64.070. The Undersigned Ron Smith attests th t _h is empowered by the Corporation to bind it to the performance specified in this agreemen as a condit. on of the Conditional Use Permit. Signed this 7th day of January,1992: Ron Smith, Northwest Regional Manager, Real Estate Division, U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc. MEM I JAN 0 8 1992 CITY OF IUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GUID•INES US West, New Vector Riverton, Tukwila Site System Activation Activate system during first mowing visit (March 16). Inspect system including: point of connection, automatic controller, . electronic valves and solenoids, back -flow preventor, manual drain valves, shut -off valve, quick couplers, turf heads, planting area heads. Repair or replace immediately any damaged, defective or missing equipment. All new equipment shall match existing. Following visual inspection of system pressurize system to determine underground leaks or breakage. Conduct a valve sequence test and watering coverage test. Adjust heads and nozzles as required. Weekly Inspection During watering season (March 16 to September 16) inspect all components of system prior to each mowing of lawn. Make required adjustments and replacements. Winterization Winterize system no later than October 30. Purge system of water by compressed air blow -out through quick coupler at point of connection. Open all remote valves, close shut -off valve upstream of point of connection, pressurize system with gradual addition of compressed air so that all nozzles are activated. Pressurize for five (5) minutes (do not exceed 90 psi), stop air purge, wait five (5) minutes then repeat. Following air purge, close all remote valves and inspect system to insure all nozzles have fully retracted. •NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES US West, New Vector Riverton, Tukwila Site The following maintenance guidelines are intended to be used with some flexibility on the part of the maintenance person. Because Of changing site conditions, such as weather, temperature, wind, tenant traffic and use, vandalism, etc., it is necessary for the maintenance person to use some common sense in applying these guidelines to achieve the desired result, which is optimum plant growth and health, and a pleasing appearance. Watering Irrigate all planted and lawn areas thoroughly at least twice per week during the growing season: April 1 to October 1. During unusually warm weather, water as often as three times per week. It is necessary to feel by hand (or use an' instrument that measures soil moisture) so that an evenly moist soil condition may be maintained. Adjust watering to meet weather conditions. Established lawns require approximately a 1" (one inch) depth of water per week during warm weather. Established shrub areas require a 1/2" (one half inch) depth of water per week during warm weather. Fertilization Apply fertilizer a minimum of three times per growing season, beginning April 15 and ending about July 1, so that the plants may begin to harden* off before winter. Fertilizer may be broadcast evenly over the planting areas, using a broadcast type spreader. If fertilizer is applies by hand, keep it out in the area of the drip line of the plant, and avoid concentrating too much in one spot. Water thoroughly after each fertilizing. Additional fertilizings may be done with liquid fertilizer if desired, but is not necessary. Use a well - balanced fertilizer that contains trace elements as well as the three major elements ( Nitrogen- Phosphorus- Potassium). An excellent fertilizer for most plants is a rhododendron -type fertilizer or Sierra blend 18 -7 -10 with trace elements. Follow the manufacturer's directions for all fertilizer applications. For lawn areas, use a well - balanced lawn fertilizer, again containing trace elements such as Agriform 21 -8 -8, apply at 15 lbs. /1,000 sq. ft. Don't use fertilizers that are too high in nitrogen, resulting in quick top growth and more frequent mowings and poorer root growth. Apply the fertilizers as above. except continue to fertilize lawn areas throughout the summer. The last lawn fertilizing should be done in late September or October using a winter fertilizer. At the same time that the winter fertilizer is applied, spread dolomitic limestone Q 100 lbs. /1,000 sq. ft. or at the rate recommended by the manufacturer. Weed Control The best weed control would be removing weeds, including roots, by hand as they appear (and long before they produce seeds). This should be done continuously throughout the growing season, and occasionally during the dormant season. Do not allow any weed buildup to occur. 1 • • If pre - emergents are necessary for weed control, apply only those that are safe for use with all of the plants. Avoid strong pre - emergents, such as Casaron, in the planting or lawn areas. A contact weed killer, such as Round -up, may be used carefully in gravel or rock areas, or wherever there are no desirable plants or grasses. Follow precisely the manufacturer's directions in applying all chemicals. Most chemicals need to be applied by a person with an applicator's license. Disease and Insect Control Watch for signs of insect or disease damage and treat the problem in the early stages, before much damage occurs. The plants that are most vulnerable to insect damage are the flowering cherries and rhododendrons and evergreen azaleas. The evergreen azaleas need to be sprayed on a regular basis with Orthene to control strawberry root weevil. Again, these chemicals must be applied by a licensed spray applicator. Pruning Remove all broken, dead or diseased branches, and all branches that are growing in a direction against the natural structure or form of the tree. Avoid shearing, except where it is desired to have a hedge -like appearance for certain shrubs. Tree pruning is an art, and should only be done by experienced persons who are sensitive to the natural structure and shape of a given tree. Dressing Beds Planting beds and lawns should be kept clean on a weekly basis from all litter and debris. Keep mulch raked smooth and even to present a sharp appearance; do not allow mulch to accumulate more that 1/2 inch in depth around the stems of shrubs. Place new mulch only in disturbed areas to a depth of 1 -1/2 to 2 inches and rake out smooth and even. Any plants that are replaced because of damage or injury should be of the same variety as the original in so far as possible. All dead or damaged plants should be removed immediately. Lawns Lawns should be kept moved to a height of 1 -1/2 inches. All clippings should be disposed of off -site. Mow lawns only when the grass is dry and the soil is firm enough so that mowing tracks are not visible. Use only a sharp mower. Trim around trees which are planted in lawn areas by hand. Avoid using string trimmers around trees, as trees can become unknowingly damaged and even girdled. Mowing Schedule March 16 to April 15 every fourteen (14) days April 16 to May 15 every ten (10) days May 16 to September 15 every seven (7) days September 16 to October 15 -every fourteen (14) days October 16 to March 15 every twenty -one (21) days 2 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 December 4, 1991 John Hunt 2205 Seattle Tower Third and University Seattle, WA 98101 PHONE 11 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor RE: 91 -3 -CUP: US WEST Cellular Phone Facility Dear John: On November 18, 1991, the Tukwila City Council voted to uphold the Planning Commission's decision which approved construction of a cellular phone facility at 13130 44th Avenue South. In order to review the building permit application (Plan File No. 91 -371) for this project, a complete set of revised plans must be provided. The revised landscape plan must include the conditions made part of the Conditional Use Permit. The following must also be provided: 1). An irrigation plan and irrigation schedule 2) A Maintenance Agreement A copy of a maintenance agreement used for a similar project has been enclosed as an example. The agreement should describe the maintenance program and inspection schedule for the replacement of dead or dying plant materials. The name of a contact person or responsible party for maintenance should also be provided. You may contact me at 431 -3663 if you have further questions. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner Enclosure. CC: 91 -3 -CUP Plan File No. 91 -371 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 September 30, Applicant: Contact: Address: Re: PHONE 11 (206) 4331800 N O T I C E O F D E C I S I O N 1991 U.S.WEST NewVector Group John Hunt 2205, Seattle Tower Third & University Seattle, WA 98101 Notice of Decision by the Planning Commission File Number 91 -3 -CUP Gary. L. VanDusen, Mayor This is to confirm that on September 25, 1991, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the construction of a 120 -foot tall cellular phone tower and a 423 - square -foot equipment building to be located at 13130 44th Avenue (adjacent to the Highway 599/ 133rd St. interchange) in accordance with the revised site plan dated September 10, 1991. The conditions are as follows: 1. That Douglas Fir,trees be planted along the perimeter of the planted area between the St. Johns Wort and seeded grass area to create a visual wall of trees; 2. That clusters of Poplar trees be planted on the street side of the fir trees; 0 3. That shrub beds be interspersed along the perimeter of trees. 4. The applicant shall provide a maintenance agreement to ensure the establishment and survival of all landscape materials. A revised landscape plan and maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for final approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Any changes to the specific design approved by the Planning Commission would require further review and approval by the Planning Commission. Minor, incidental changes may be administratively approved by the Director of Community Development. The decision of the Planning Commission is not final until the appeal period has elapsed, which is ten calender days after the above date of decision. Appeals must be filed in writing to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the final day of the appeal period. Where the final day of an appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday, the appeal period would be extended to 5:00 p.m. on the next work day. If you have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact me at 431 -3663. Sincerely, 0.14i„ Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner A r r i u m v t r O F G I S T R,._I 8 U T f O N 6 Sylvia A. Osby. hereby declare that: (l Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting (] 8oard of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet J Planning Commission Agenda Packet [] Short Subdivision Agenda Packet X Determination of Nonsignificance [1 Mitigated Determination of Non. significance (� Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice C1 Notice of Action Q Official Notice [! Notice of Application for Other Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit [] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project U.S. West Cell Site File Number EPIC -30 -91 August 6, 1991 i/g/A-- -(.6V4-' Sign ure WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Erect 432 square foot equipment building and 120 foot tall ground -mount antennae to carry nine cellular phone base station antennas. Proponent U.S. West Newvector Group, Inc. P.O. Box 91211 Bellevue, WA 98009 -2211 Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 13130 44th Avenue South, S.E. end of site behind existing industrial building adjacent to SR- 99/133rd Street Interchange. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -30 -91 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not 'have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [] There is no comment period for this DNS [J This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwi) , lA -8188 Oat (5-/e Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS [gal l�l L -Jut-0-1-1991 Cis p_LQQlM1NG DFPT Tukwila Planning Department City Hall, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Dennl Shefrin Re: Conditional Use Penult Applications U S WEST NewVector, Riverton and Andover Cell Sites Dear Ms. Shefrin: Hunt - Associates (206) 624-0846 2205 Seattle Tower Third & University Seattle, Washington 98101 July 1, 1991 I am enclosing supplemental materials to assist you in the preparation of the staff report for the above applications. These include: (1) Photo-composites made up of photos of an existing NewVector "monopole" of similar size, taken at measured distances, mounted on background photos of the Riverton site taken at the same estimated distances, at various points around the vicinity. The Andover pole will not be visible for its full height fran most areas, so no photo-composite was made; the architectural elevation should adequately illustrate the scale. (2) A basic landscaping plan for the Riverton site, sent under separate cover by the architect; we would expect to use this as a starting point for discussion with Planning staff of the best landscaping to meet the City's objectives in this area. No landscaping plan is submitted for the Andover site, as it is surrounded by paved parking and loading area. A solid fencing screen could be used if appropriate, but landscaping would be difficult to install (see photos). (3) Description ,r the need for the facilities, based on NewVector's system design and need for capacity e: ;r nsion (following discussion). I hope that these will be helpful, and that you will feel free to call me if you need any materials further explained or supplemented. THE SYSTEM DESIGN: Cellular phone service is provided in "cells ", which are geographic service areas defined by local topography as reachable from a single "cell site" with line -of -sight transnission from the cell site's antennas. The system uses low -power FM radios to broadcast in allocated frequencies in the upper end of the U1-11' band. Where a market has a potential for a large volume of simultaneous calls on portable or mobile telephones, which may exceed the number of frequencies allocated to the company, multiple cells are set up at low -lying locations. These use topography to isolate the next- adjacent cells from one another, so that allocated frequencies can be re -used without interference with phones using the same channel some distance away. The Tukwila area has up to now been served by a single cell site, an antenna next to the water tower at the top of the hill west of Southcenter (3765 S. 164th St.), now in the City of SeaTac. This cell is currently being overloaded by call volume from the SeaTac Airport area, combined with the high volume from the 1 -5/1 -405 interchange area. Capacity needs to be increased by "subdividing" the single cell serving Tukwila, SeaTac and Burien into a number of smaller cells. These are what may be called "second generation" cell sites which, instead of a covering a broad area from a hilltop tower, are focussed at small, local areas from a shorter pole set in a geographic basin, using the edges of the basin to help limit signal carry to a defined area. U S WEST NewVector - Riverton/Andover CUP's 1 July 1991 - Page Two le -------7-..i---51,7N--[0----- uLsk Ls JUL 01 1991 ) CITY OF TUKVVILA PLANNING DEPT. Both the Riverton and Andover sites are a part of a general plan for subdivision of the fonner "Tukwila" cell; the existing Tukwila cell will be relieved of call volume in the Green and Duwamish Valley areas to the East of it, by these two proposed sites, and on the south and west peripheral service areas by new cells in Burien and Des Moines. The "Tukwila" cell site will then be turned down in power and made directional, to only serve the SeaTac area. Topographic breaks between most of these cells, the natural ridges, will be used to isolate signals and allow channel re -use; this will be illustrated at the hearing with graphics and maps. In answer to your question whether further cell sites are contemplated in Tukwila, the answer would he a tentative 'no ", for the "second generation" sites. There may be some poor signal areas evident, once these new sites are on the air, which might require supplementation, possibly with a passive repeater or a small cell. An example might be Interurban Avenue, where it passes close to the hill north of City Hall; if the reduction of power at other sites deprives it of a strong signal, there height be a need to fill in frun another location. Beyond this type of second generation design fine - tuning, new cells might be held off until Tukwila might generate sufficiently dense call traffic to go to a "third generation design ", such as is now being installed in downtown Seattle and Bellevue. Third generation sites tend to be quite low, such that virtually all are mounted on building rooftops, with equipment typically in the building. RADIO SIGNALS AND HEALTH ISSUES: The issue of potential health impacts of radio broadcast signals has arisen in a number of local communities, generally accompanied by considerable confusion between different types of electro- magnetic fields (EMF) and different frequencies of broadcasting and signal modulation. Literature cited by concerned citizens generally focusses on two types of field or radio signal: major facilities such as radar installations or major microwave relay points, or high- voltage electrical transmission lines and other sources of EMI' which are modulated at an extremely low frequency (ELF). There is also, understandably, confusion between discussions of "EMF" and "ELF ". Documented reasons for concern in these areas, plus misunderstanding of the teen "microwave ", occasionally spills over as concern for all manner of Radio- frequency (RF) signals, most of which do not in fact have the characteristics of the sources of concern. Cellular radio, especially, is in a range of frequencies (formerly the upper end of the "UI -IF" television band) which is a million to ten million times greater frequency than the area of concern for "ELF" health effects. In teens of the concern for very powerful radio -band generated EMF, the cell sites generate a maximum power which is lower by a factor of one millionth, compared to the military radar installations which are indicated as a concern. Power density is similar to that produced from the antenna of a single "Ham" radio operator, who can broadcast at 1000 to 4000 watts "ERP" (effective radiated power, from antennas). Finally, though cellular is in the upper end of the "UHF" spectrum, close to the arbitrary boundary with "microwave" (one Gigal -lertz and above), there is not the potential for tissue damage from induced heating, which occurs with special frequencies tuned to the resonant frequencies of tissue molecules or (as in a microwave oven) the water molecule. Some tissue heating or other biological effects are a potential which has not been experiinentally ruled out entirely, so the industry does inaintain standards for inaxiinuin EMF strength for general safety. The closest comparison is with the inajor television antennae, which have been broadcasting in heavily populated areas for 40- 50 years, at similar frequencies but at power densities 100 to 1000 times greater than cellular phone antenna sites, without epidemiological indications of potential health effects. Volumes of technical studies and reports in these areas have been reviewed jointly over the past two years by the City of Seattle and by King County, assisted by technical staff in the Seattle - King County Health Department. Conclusions, embodied in draft ordinances now up for adoption, include setting maximum levels for electro - magnetic field strength in the UHF frequencies of 200 microwatts per square centhneter; these are 10 tunes to 100 times greater than the levels which this U S WEST NewVector - Riverton/Andover CUP's 1 July 1991 - Page Three ![J/[] JUL 01 1991 CITY OF TUKVVILA PLANNING DEPT. type of cell site will generate at or near the base of the pole. Detailed calculations and comparisons can be provided if desired. Should the City desire to check these general conclusions independently, I would recommend that you call Mr. Kurt Horner at the Seattle -King County Health Department, at 296 -4974. CELL SITE DESIGN: As noted elsewhere, the Riverton cell site search area was restricted to the center of the natural bowl at the south end of the Duwamish Valley. Ideal sites were within the Gateway area, though this area has generally developed as a high- quality office/industrial park and had no landowners willing to acco niodate a cell site. Sites on the periphery were investigated, and this site was chosen, utilizing a small property corner close to SR -99. There are a number of tall poles in the vicinity, including gas station signs and interchange light poles. The equipment building will be screened by low -level landscaping and fencing; the pole will to some extent be screened by existing trees, but more by the substantial distance between the site and the nearest residential zones on the hillsides to the West and South. The Andover site is in the iniddle of a developed industrial area, behind a building and facing a railroad spur and loading docks. The pole top will be visible within the industrial area but distance wiU diminish the scale of the pole fran outside the industrial zones. The search area for the site was almost entirely within the East Andover Industrial Park, where the hill north of City Hall blocks signal transmission between it and the Riverton site, yet a good transition between the two signals can be made along the crest of 1 -5 north of the 1 -405 interchange. I encourage follow -up questions and discussion of these materials. I would be happy to supplement them if needed for the staff report or at the public hearings. A joint hearing date on the two sites will facilitate the explanation of the cellular system design and how it has resulted in the location and characteristics of these two proposed sites. Yours very truly, Enclosures cc: U S WEST NewVector - Ron Smith CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONM NTAL REVIEW ROUTI�G FORM EPIC: 3D_ psi dfrl�' tanning Pub YE Ode,. 'arfcsl tK�c PROJECT U Wf4ci Zet4j01/ -r'O I 41-{ (w. I f ruroav aass ricru.* ?Q{KP5,1 ADDRESS DATE 'TRANSMITTED 40,71/4( RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (i/ /fir I f / ` DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR j. ITEM IJAe : o . entAtiousici reviewed vari ante offliatiffern. alt c ladenvironme itat checklist was received regarding this project. Pteasa review'anc mrnant below to. advise .the•responsibte official` regarding: the tflreshotd"detetminatioiPTtae' anylronmentat review.file.is available in the Planning Department through theabove Staff; ordinator.';Comments regarding the • project you. wish carried. :to the Ptanntng�Commisstofl Board of Adjustment and City Councit.should be submitted tnthe comment section betow� COMMENT Date: Comments prepared by: 09114/811 CONDIJNAL US'E .. APPLICATION a I 6300 Southcenter Boulevard ;-Tukwila, -WA 981 68-- -r Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planner: Alut FOR STAFF USE ONLY File Number: Ot — y 3 - Cb1 Cross - Reference Files: 091C 36' 111 Receipt Number: A ! ;'C 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: T"cate a 12' x 36' prefabricated equipment building and a 120' tall metal pole to carry 9 cellular phone base station antennas 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 13130 44th Avenue South, SE end of site behind existing industrial building, adjacent tothe SR -99/ 133rd St interchange. Quarter: NE Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc./ Agent: John W. Hunt Address: P.O. Box 91211, Bellevue, WA 98009 -2211/ 1218 3rd Ave #2205 450 -8100 / S�aLLle 98101 WA Phone. / 624 -0846 Signature: * The ap to who �✓' Date: 13 June 1991 t is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: Clark Mechanical, Inc. c/o Wendell G. Clark OWNER • Address:201 Union Avenue SE, #200 Phone: 271 -5767 I /WE,[signature(s)] - swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: ��� ,Le, %1/, / / CONDITIONAL USE API/CATION 1 Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant field behind industrial building 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): (11) Radio, television or observation stations and towers 7. ADJACENT North: Industrial /storage with contractor's office LAND South: Freeway interchange USES East: West: small single - family house 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): The building will contain low -power FM -band radios (800 -900 MHz bands.@ 100 watts output from antenna) and computers to control channel usage for mobile or portable phones in the immediate area (1 -2 mile radius). Backup batteries for short power outages in main room of building, diesel generator for extended power outage use in sepdLdte C:l1dll eL dL end of builaiciy, with 15 yd 0115 aiebel Luel, iii ibuldLeL1 chamber with "spill -pan" floor to contain all liquids within building. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? Yes 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: The operation will create very little traffic (1 visit per month by technician plus any repay visits). noise will be less than ambient highway noise. No processes will create impacts off -site or hazardous emissions or spills. Radio. frequencies and signal strength will not interfere with other electronic processes or equipment in the industrial area, nor create any health risks for persons living or working in the a ar . B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: Applicants will discuss structure colors and site screening with City staff and will follow specifications recommended by staff and agreed to by BAR. CONDITIONAL USE API CATION • Page 3 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: Extremely low traffic, will not generate or impede pedestrian traffic. Building and site design will be of higher quality than existing adjacent development D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: The site is in a Manufacturing area where existing and future land uses are least likely to conflict with it (no consistent, existing pattern). The site uses a remote property remnant on a highway interchange, generally unsuited to and therefore not affecting or displacing other Manufacturing uses. The use is located in an area where the view from the surrounding residential areas (hillside to west) already includes similar, pole -type visual elements. E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: See siting factors noted above; the pole height is the minimum necessary to serve the local area with this utility service from a single site, without proliferation of such sites in the same geographic area and visual area. A. BACKGROUND Contro. Epic File No. 3D-61 1 Fee - $4-997$6 Receipt No. 616110000 $22-5 0._c? ENV IRONMENTAL_CHECKLIST UVWF WIAALTE 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RIVER'ION CELL SITE - Cellular Phone antennas 2. Name of applicant: U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc. (206) 450 -8100 P.O. BoN 91211, Belle ue, WA 98009 -2211 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact: John W. Hunt 1218 3rd Avenue, Suite 2205, Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 624 -0846 4. Date checklist prepared: 13 June 1991 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Immediate construction, no phasing 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No outside changes; some additional radio sets may be added in the building in future, but this will not require addition of any antennas or other external equipment. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Technical studies and literature reviews conducted by Seattle -King County Health Dept. have documented that there is no basis for concern on antennas such as these, for health effects from non- ionizing ram signals of high frequency and low power, as proposed. If City staff have not reviewed these or similar ma erials, contact Mr. Hunt for additional —3ocumentation of non - significance of antenna output. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No JUN 1 3 1991 -2- CITY OF T UKWILA f-PT • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. FAA/FCC approval of broadcast location and tower height (decision to mark or not mark for aircraft safety) in progress. City of Tukwila height variance, Conditional Use Permit and DesignlReview II " building permits and related .permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you.. to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Erect 120' tall "monopole" to carry cellular telephone base station ( "cell site ") antennas; locate 12'x 36' prefabricated building at baserof pole, for automated electronic equipment and an emergency diesel generator. Site will be unoccupied. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13130 44th Avenue South; Lots 8, 9, 11, and 12 of Block 5, Riverton Replat of IOtskl to 5, Fostoria Garden Tracts, Vo1Z3 of Plats, p.40, King County WA. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Nci only first 15' of access drive are within affected area, within 35: of Cl a53 drainage channel T0BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAI B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth •Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Mixed sandy soils and surface fill (rear of developed commercial lot) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Excavation and removal from site of up to 20 cu. yds. o soi or massive pi e oun•ation or pole, tour -,grade beams under building. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? l00 3 • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Remove excavation spoils from site 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i..e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. very occasional use of diesel generator b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not sensitive c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None; standard emission controls on diesel engine; used only in tests & emergency power outages 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Unnamed drainage channel immediately to West across access easement; flows to Duwamtsh River Evaluation for Agency Use Only • .Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 41) Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow ,into other waters? If so,, describe. small building roof of 432 sq.ft. and building on grade beans, will minimally • - cli to West �e -• III • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste produced d. Proposed measures.'to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Fuel tank and filler for diesel generator will be wholly within a separate building chamber which includes a spill -pan floor to contain all possible spill volumes from tank and engine within the building. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? grass removed from site surface c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None Site perimeter landscaping screen will be determined with City staff, primarily for screening purposes. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Not surveyed; site very small, adjacent to Highway interchange mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Not surveyed; heavily impacted site fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Not surveyed b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: See Water quality protection measures, above • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Single -phase electrical power to operate equipment and air conditioner to exhaust excess heat from peak operation of radios; emergency diesel generator b. Would your project'af.fect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Unheated building; automated equipment powered up only on demand 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Fuel spillage from diesel generator; will be contained within building (see above, water). -. Electromagnetic field from radios at high trequency, very low power will beLfar below levels of concern for7health; peak operation will create less than 25 microwatts /cm. at base of pole. See Note, page 1 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health dhazards, if any: See above, under Water, 3d. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? not sensitive 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated. with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Air conditioner would operate during peak phone demand periods (weekday commuting hours); diesel generator would operate up to 10 min. once a week in daytime, to test, Up to 8 hours continuous during extended power outage. Both produce less than 55 dBA 0 lUU tt. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts if any: Engine muffled, contained within building to shield engine "clatter". 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site,and adjacent properties? Tire shop on site, industrial uses in immediate area. Limited access highway interchange is immediately adjacent on East and South b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Tire shop building to North (see plan) • 4111 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the . urrent zoning classification of the site? Ml. , Light Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No; drainage ditch within 50 feet of buildings, only small portion of driveway within 35' of ditch i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Site is an extremely small area, "remnant" from highway interchange condemnation, not displacing or affecting • other potential land uses; use is compatible with all other uses as no appreciable traffic,onoise or other impacts. 4111 Evaluation for 0 Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate'-whether high, middle, or low - income housing. ne c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 120' tall pole; equipment building is beige painted fiberglass panel exterior. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Tower visible from hillsides to the West, against backdrop of industrial area, tall gas station signs and highway interchange. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Pole can be painted any color desired; trees along drainage channel to West will screenTer portion of pole trom some directions . Applicant wishes to develop landscaping plan with City Planning staff to mitigate appearance of equipment building. • 11. Light and Glare .Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There is slight possibility that FAA' would require a non- blinking, red marker light atop the pole, for aircraft safety marking; this is unlikely but not definite until FAA makes official response, b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not sensitive d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: No lights or reflective surfaces proposed 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A .Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No c. PropouA measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing Driveway yto edead Show c of 132nd pStreet, (then e . S. and 133rd St. to SR- 599,.;.or via Interurban Ave. to 1-5. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c. Now many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? One new; none existing • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. One trip per month for site inspection, after construction g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control, direct impacts on ublic services if any. Site building will contain automatic alarms for fire, entry, equipt. failure, monitored 24 hrs. /day at central switch 5 miles north • 16. Utilities Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Only electricity and phone line will be used; immediately available at site b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Power (Seattle City Light) and phone (U S WEST) will be extended by overhead line from nearest poles C. Signature The above answers my knowledge. I relying on them to Signature: Date Submitted: are true and complete to the best of understand that the lead agency is make its/d'= ision. 13. Ju e 1991 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. (pp.18 -21 for non — project actions, not included) Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide low —power FM -band radio coverage within the immediately adjacent natural basin in the Duwamish valley, between Riverton Heights and the southerly end of Boeing field. These radios are the link between the wire-line phone system and mobile or hand -held cellular phones in this area. Careful siting and precise antenna height are required to cover a precise area, allowing computerized "handoff" of a call in progress from a mobile phone passing through the "cell" to the next cell, and to prevent signal spilling over into the next cells beyond the immediately adjacent cells, where the same FCC allocate radio frequencies may be re -used. This allows re- use.of channels to increase system capacity without interference between calls or "cross- talk ", and is the primary objective of the "cellular" system design, i.e. to isolate broadcast signals within clearly defined "cells ". 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Antenna pole siting elsewhere within the limited geographic area at or near the center of the "cell" defined above, with the same antenna height above mean sea level (generally taller than here, as base elevations are the same or lower elsewhere). Most of the rest of the area searched vas of higher existing visual quality; landowners in the Gateway area (most of the "height exemption area ") were unwilling to have a pole on their properties, as they have or intend to develop high quality campus offices, not compatible with this installation in their opinion. Four potential sites were analysed in Allentown but were dropped as, at that time, City policy indicated the height was not permitted by_zoning. There are fewer existing tall structures ( signs; power poles, light poles on.freeway) in the Allentown area compared to this site. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: See above, #2 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with. policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No; industrial /type uses compatible with this low- traffic, low- impact use. City now interprets utility poles as exempt from general policies on structure height. Sensitive Areas ordinance as passed does not affect this proposal. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Work with City staff on low -level bulding screening, building and pole color for minimum aesthetic impacts. -23- May 3, 1991 Interstate Mobilephone Co. d /b /a Cellular One 617 Eastlake Avenue E Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98119 Re: 12228 51st Place S, Allentown, WA Dear Sirs: I agree to maintain the lawn area of the above referenced property. This maintenance will consist of regular lawn mowing as needed. Cellular One will be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped area of their leased area. ./ I also grant permission to Cellular One to erect a chainlink fence across the fron •roperty line of the above address if required by the City of Tuk rt M. Burke RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER • • STATE OF &v co12�1 4S17n J COUNTY OF vet SS 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Robert M. Burke is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he is the owner of the property located at 12228 51st Place S, Allentown, WA., and that he signed this . instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ____Vo6 /9i Notary ublic 49.//0/9 My appointment expires -1.24487. Residing at •, Washington r , 1' v r 1 HI:� �CHUSTER GROU [NCB. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 4, 1991 TO: Ron Smith FROM: The Schuster Group, Inc. RE: SEA Riverton The following is a description of the status of all properties in the Riverton area that would provide a feasible location for a U S WEST NewVector cell site, and would meet the zoning requirements for the City of Tukwilla: Property_ Ownex Status 1) Kaiser Gateway Assoc. Willing to roof mount antennas at height of approximately 15 feet, not willing to allow for additional height. 2) Boeing Employees Credit Union Not Interested. 3) Bedford Development Company No Room. 4) Willard Levine No Room. 5) Mobile Oil Corporation Not Interested. 6) Unocal Corporation Not Interested. 7) Texaco Inc. Not Interested. 8) Donald Wilson No Room. 9) Denny's Inc. Not Interested. Based on our research of the area, there are no properties within the height exemption area that would provide an adequate location for a NewVector cell site. If NewVector is to build a cell site in the Tukwilla area, it will be necessary to pursue zoning relief in the areas surrounding the height exemption area. If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 562 -3054. Thank you. KVE P Ft' Nc 71).1■,5 . 1.1P1l,>v,ir VJ\ QXO(t7 - 1?Of�l 5(i7 "ti154 • NORMANDY' PARK ow\ . ■•• AREA MAP VICINITY MAP ESP `111110N .1 \ ,c>, \\ 9! \\ \ !f,_ • '5 \ \\ . :, M1_W'� • VJ A 6` • `// 000 0I /!� SITE PLAN �fsole: 1•.20' •0' \,7 PACIFIC HIGHWAY I� 033rd. Sr - Ram,) I ♦I 24 LONE. "II II AREA MAP VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION ton 0 a 1, AND 11 • R 1130C[5 •0101011 RFIAT 01 MO 1 TO R. FOITOIIA GARDEN TACO ACCORDING TO FIAT RECORDED IN YOEUME 13 OF FAR FAG 40. IN ONG COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITE PLAN DRAWN BY: DATE: 2- 20 -1I REVISION: SHEET: 1 OF 2 Q�- r L.,.•. „f ,>.L Iw•. is • •••••• .e• ++'I s'o' a T xo FOUNDATION PLAN Katz 4.• oci OFOUNDATION DETAIL .L.0 w • 1. 9 u' ANCHOR DETAIL ELEVATION OF TOWER & EQUIPMENT BUILDING SCALE: ,r10' . 1'•0. H 2 410 2 2 a o j J O 5 W o-I 2 .,0 0 cL_ L U .AIL" ANTe N N,,S Cil P. W/ EI TI-1 EL. n i `E TUwE L ) d 1._Dcx. SEEh21 -m rL - M T cv v , S A. am sus ELEVATION N Sr 1LE: 1/16" = 1'•0" 'r A • ,. ve y-- 71-00 c/o CDP1A afil-Le-• • . • t• • ' • ."•. . • . • • r,. YeW k kAACe)' 3 -CIL_ (500 r. A.A dl ojj:s 41/4ii.ilvo ot.1 '1? 444 +c Ail a. e 7,1" vnderra-si pc ;,4461 cr 4' giv.c1/1-(n/vCc., ;62-,a4.. S•12-_-79q i T ! ` . 35- 07 20 .76'-40 T / /fie O6;j 1/�< C,419: /3g0 F� I� 45/3• /2j¢ 45/7/22 s ¢'S "/22 8. As N O e,4) 0 NN o``D 61') N s sR?C ss ▪ 0 634ti O c � F o F›, 3 o I o - ▪ F 2 22 /382 N z I oN Q3 tu 1 °b 2;e6) C iV h• v O W p i'�. .w \ � .•I - 30.0. • p; r'� ■ V .A .6h 4... 75 '1 7�,. "ccc-PA4/FIG fllGNW"»' • R =542 9�° a514 r P.0 T i7f 9,5.28 CRELOC ! 20, Dy.2.3 A ?arFE /0too .. p.c. Rr ✓EK'o//-Y 4/8.87 •OQD f c ^9ro iV 39-57-57 208 /8 w /LA �b ; Q x:!14 j Sao 0 0. h • m .�S �.'.0 - I I < �( / • O T fr L - • CA Tl CP 67 v w , , !/ISu az8b-•48 S • 394.50 9- 0 e°. 095 R_ �� Q(,l 7R. (cfkl U�4—c--7 ,r. LOT 3 • 3 BDI•.� , LC Nom,__, CA S \ coy 4°; /D1 e /66 :)v A' � '\° 32G t4 %P,) 3?. ,Z, • 2 0 • 6bI\ j F . 68 -53� 2. at. �' z Qom__ a. •\<7, sc LOT 2 AREA MAP :. ,10 ,HRUp Il4 .44004 MEIN RDGOU pR .• Sf TVAT SRBIRUIO Burien 7H oUlDER. E 4E DITCH F DRe.I1-.1AC4 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION' LOTS 8'8 9, AND 11 & 12 BLOCK 3 RIVERTON REPLAT OF LOTS 1 TO..:. 5. FOSTORIA GARDEN ;TRACTS ACCORDING TO FIAT: RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PIATS.'PAGE 40. IN RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DRAWN BY: DATE: 2 - 25 -4I REVISION: 9 - 30.- 91. .NORTH _ . _. N SITE:., PLAN scale .1.0.20' - 0• 9 .O3•019 IJUM1019911. CITY OF Tu�•••W PLAMNING DEPT.. SHEET:. ■ \\\ O x /. I \\s /33rb' scree./. 1 \� 11=E11-D-: ol101-, Mr-."6.41-4'ef-/ c TALav y P ?fl LAW4I-rAl2 -4'I ' -IP fOro? } • Z.5'MGIo . %h rbl. ^, 2(a), 4(M,7(P),. Mali 1-t FFCGWPIT 11oN P. NN -t- oµ . 71114 e,i4INE:. blNT 'N6 DeTHLZD. • 1Pt1f% t-thAD - 12 fiiP -IMP SAM P17G 2- - 26'f1;171( :4 " /hr •'2(a), 1(f°, l (F).MATC4-1CP PF CP: INSTAu.DN . I, JO N.. � Ab SeTAU;f.L:•' FV1r0 YIH1_IL' com12.0. \AU10 •- 1' 111X, Ph 1,17rGD o1 :Pf "4-111" : I-tuNTeP- f - P•J 3(A' . iurrre& Pbti - ALt1 • ? ' ° I'A N1IP"D I?G G1P I U� f F�l +PPfD Pc.1•11-/rtP Ifo .,o, elos-r • ® ' I'1j WATGP- MCTGY- G{ UI�IF,I N ✓ pvL ACt A` , 2Q)` .. Ay�l p Cf'TC D 1,3" M N' COCA- . PlFe, •4IZC -N cG Ih PT •PIfi°i D:A.: Pu-ow Fr ACC. Mt?". VAWe '�IPiN6 /_'1ucfCA1Ct. ZP ,C. • - . INLICATe&, &fM ���10� ILIC!Lf�TG%? 51'ZL on ic• V1FTef -ik, f L r 47WIJ [x.> 1t.A N 4. Z.1•iIO-4 COfK1 ouCP • C.6NNe(1 TO.12ov a.c. Ser-VIGG IN LOCATION 10 IN , PGDe>T,ot, N10•)NT, f JI Gr. • • 'PAP •, Qr Ov'.µlwh - {Ps2) rF2M r.✓- g7oi,I.ep- TNPo'& cA •vave • . f324 To FdPTrI� T• f3 rFar/1"Goi•,rpoaG I'/4" f'oNze a- {--.VA ve• Est r .7 : INSTALL -As fr'- L�TAIIi. -FWON. GMOE PPlN8'.PD - ?i', pvPc .. s/y • • QUiU'. ('c4- \ L Je., Irr z,u. Ot-e% Pr :cAx, vAWe : ft-F•CCTAU.. PP'ONZL- .NR4 FL. 7F-A!N V(-A JG -, �ZM 1 = e - ' 1 v N • IN•7rAi,L P.‘=- Ft F- ' A1" LoW • f $TS OP 1p1N1.4 NPi Asf'cR TO ftl.Vf PLAY+ CfiAMP■ON WV F-4 ec.eaae+oTosTerr.r . - FOR uvrwZATIGN I 4dI ')o-, -no re, p'-eee .•ttc WX.G •:. a .GOno -fif bor.: I% 4I /Jae ruck CdXuh //'%J ✓•ulf h:x .. •fin�D9 •OL 'h' CRASS DRAIN VALVE. .. _ ' •.I' h/J.• 4,...ti/v fiv!/ �' fI N1 R•o5Ta•novAUreno% VALVE t-- wAC �x1 i Zi F♦•LCO&OWMILIEYLGCCX [q /w qar aPW'oved .b.e4. I nsr (►RevGl•rtJC... nos fFl. uwU NI- - If nl LI_ EiAFOGN VALVE EOx Q • I'II 1' �`/ ♦u►errn M Iv 044.../e Cox .° o%fr'�/g= i a.. WI .9 smillill♦lal �rocil ll= (n.M J MOB (_' 1 ' ..gam' g., '.113riifwm gi • 0 O • NCN tice'1►ryeAt:r NRLYC nerzp. f--/71 CONNIEIGT1117 vu'•Carnc eecvlce 404E1L ML'R]T itt9/1 of Co:A/A/Kr /om) AI& ENS! A UALV.IMd TX FK. TEL OACK01.1 FTC. MAIN ' OQ OHO -YOIL ✓ALVL I N e•ILrcD' SFNN[1f/.LD4L FASO W a Awry, • 11LMOtt vALTL • ISO ■ , pvc. shave. fon .end- aostr. • NI/ ✓G ruder b e„,9n•rl ov+p.... V'oia Y•A!J px j�wJ esw?n ��I I - 9 //`Oa• .to Omin sf•a✓zlt. Drub /a check va /vv aa5•mb /y •prin J6 f /ush • .4' 6Nyl yI du finish ynde. I Gtuf.ev`G// P• VL 1•13/151 ly /i barbed G L'/t v.46.x/ e ray iy- Cfhy /•he, •. /LX pP- barbedpo /y- ethy /ehe. eJ/ n• NI it dafe: /e- 1lo -9/ crave : / - ?o' -o'. • STATE OF WASHINGTON • ltd [.E0 ueosCAeE ARCHITECT C[•Tn KATt 110. •-"t"'"7"ea'' • „.4.,,,...,,,,,!•-•.....' • .. ,. ., I ., .. .. ,,,.,....i..L. • ^• • f rA,A • ie.,' ' • N., • ! •. K § ( • ' . * :�