The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-301-85 - WESTAR TRANSPORT - TRUCK TERMINALWESTAR TRANSPORT TRUCK TERMINAL FACILITY FOR WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION 1097 ANDOVER PARK EAST EPIC-301-85 WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Truck terminal facility for warehouse and distribution Proponent Westar Transport Tnr Location of Proposal, including street address, if any inQ7 Andover Park East Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 301 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS 0 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 12, —1 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear -some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS A. BACKGROUND • HO/ 25 1985 Cont. No. Epic File No. 85-‘X4 'c-J Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 1n_ C'i T v .11,4• .Ve'1LAENV RONMENTAL CHECKLIST • P! AA'i• ING DEPT. Warehouse & Distribution Services 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: occupy 16.280 s.f. 2. - Name of applicant: Westar Transport__Inc. It-1-7519 II- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Thomas J. Pool (206) 575 —qo9.5 4. Date checklist prepared: November 18, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): To OCSAlay existing hnilrling at 1097 Andnvar Perk East 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property . covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A enter 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Cnnditinnal use p rt tc_ * 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here.. Andover East $iness Park, 1097 Andover Park East Building B. Proposed to occupy 4'280 s.f. of warehouse space including 1,800 s.f. of office on the South end of Building_. B. Building A total s.f. of 36,400 ,.Building B total of 56,.788, _Iota' land 4.9 acres. for the purpose of warehouse and distribution service. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 1097 Andover Park East sound end of Building B. Refer to page 24. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO.BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAO. S Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? no slope c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Does not apply existing buildings. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Does not apply e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Does not apply. PP y• f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,. construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Does not apply. 411. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Does not apply. * 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions from truck;ng..perations known in the b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. _None Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None._ 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None of the above. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. no 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. _ no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. no • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NA c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water inns to a drain located between_Building A and Building B. II) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only ' 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: /A 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? none c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. nnna I• Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: N/A mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: N/A fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: . List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none know c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N/A d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NJA • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. (:as hearers in warehouse. HVAC system in office. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NSA c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, • describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire exit at rear of warehouse. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise * 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: ,traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?_ ��Q. from tha_..AndovPr lark -a.rea 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would, come from the site. Traffic noise between the hours of 7:00. a.m. and 12:00 mid.nite * 3) Proposed measures to reiuce or control noise impacts, if any: .Pnccihly rednre warehousE -hours or operation 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? C -M zoning, light industrial use of warehousing and distribution_ Tnrt„ctrial Park b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Building A 36.400 s.f., Building R 56,768 s f. existing_ buildings • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? light industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ten ( currently sPVPn employees) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: proposal is compatible with snrrnundi„g business, snma of "..which arp the same. • • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N. /A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? % None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A Bo manufacturi g will occur in his space. c.. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nbre Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site..None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None * 14. Transportation, a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and .describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See site plan Andover Park East. enter .aud exit. , *. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? I.f not, what is the approximate distance,to the nearest transit stop? No .transit on Andover Park East. Distance of 500 yards to nearest transit stop. .Andover Park West c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A project has total of _ 113 parking stalls. • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). N/A e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Existing rail G nr is present to proposed space. * f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 6 -12 vehicular - trips.pPrsLay_- .:peak hours 8:00''a.m. - 4:00. p.m. * g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: .S'rhPduling by appnintment_- 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. C e utilitie . r e ei one— IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only ently available at the site: efuse service septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them toma1 make/its decis' n. Signature: cam— - - (J Date Submitted: ZU /9(.P\ 0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of. toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect punts, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? / Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed, measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: i 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whethep/it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans ?. Evaluation for Agency Use Only i/ r • • Evaluation for Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7.. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. / -20- Agency Use Only • Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -21- • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the Objective(s) of the proposal? To graz,t the prnpnsPd a Conditional Us' Parmit a,d Occupy the prPmi ses l nratad of 1 097 Andnvpr Park Fast 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Under definition of Truck Terminal in the City of Tukwila a Conditianal—Zge--is needed in all 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The proposed optioned to try for Conditional Use in C -M Toning. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what popi- cies of the Plan? The.proposed use will be consistent ." with 'all policies o£ the Tukwila comprehensive land. use policy plan.. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: _ ') Working with tha rtty to avoid any conflicts that may arise -23- ANDOVER EAST BUSINESS CENTER • That portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 tast WM.; described as follows: Beginning •at the Southeast corner of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 26: thence North 87°44'08" West along the South line of said Southeast 1/4 of Section 26 a distance of 949.49 feet: ' thence North 01°47'29" as a distance of 185.61 feet to the true point of beginning: thence continuing North 01°47'29" East a distance of 362.16 feet; thence along a curve to the right, having a radius of 300.00 feet, an arc distance of 90.34 feet, through a central angle of 17°1514" to the North line of Southcenter Industrial Park, being the North line of that certain tract described in Real Estate Contract recorded under Auditor's File No. 6034786: thence South 88°12'31" East along said North line of Southcenter. Industrial Park .a distance of 474.57 feet to the West margin of Andover Park East! thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left on said West margin, the center of which bears South 69°09'36" East having a radius of 330.00 feet an arc distance of 109.71 feet, through a central angle of 19°02'55"; thence South 01°47'29" West along said West margin of Andover Park East, a distance of 344.01 feet to the Northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to Nordstrom Best, Inc. by deed recorded under Aecording No. 710520-0140; thence North 88°08'21" West along North line of said Nordstrom Best, Inc. tract, a distance of 470.00 feet to the true point of beginning; Situate inthe County Of. 146g; State:of Washington.' •.•.:, CITY OF`TUFWILA Central Permit System yam' 00 MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT-APPL1CAT1ON FORM rft9FRIVE0 T.T2510851 (':T'4' . ; . TI' . MLA PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NO ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: °BstP ❑SPLIT ODCONDITIONAL USE ['SUBDIVISION ❑UNCLASS. USE QSHORELINE PERM 1T 0 PRD DPMUD 0INTERURBAN ['VARIANCE �CHG. OP ZONING QCOMP PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICANT: NAME WPCtar Tranapnrt Tnr_ TELEPHONE ( 206 ) 575 -9055 ADDRESS 1097 Andover Park East Bldg. B, Tukwila, WA zip 98188 PROP. OWNER: NAME pM RRAT.TY AnVTSORS_ TELEPHONE ( 714) 640 -3558 ADDRESS 700. Newport Center Drive , Newport .Beach, CA zip 92660 PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 1097 Andover Park East * Legal description on separate page. SECTION II: PROJECT INFORMATION. 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YQU.PROPOSE Occupy the premises.listed above for warehouse and distribution of dry food products. 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM N/A TO N/A 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? OYES ONO IF YES, DESCRIBE: NIA PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 2.139 GROSS 4.9 acres EASEMENTS B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL ifFLOORSe) N/A 1NCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT 0 MEZZANINE TOTAL GROSS N/A INCLUDES: O BASEMENT OMEZZANINE FLOOR AREA C1 SITE UTILIZATION: EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES ZONING DESIGNATION C -M same COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION light industrial same BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA N/A ❑ game ❑ LANDSCAPE AREA N/A ❑` same ❑ PAVING AREA N/A ❑ same ❑ TOTAL PARKING rALLS: - STANDARD sfzE 113 113 - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA flat same AVER. SLOPE OF SITE flat same 8) IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? f YES n NO FTUKWILA - ,er~tra[ P®rmi.twSyste -;- MASTER" LAID"-' APP I CAT 1 Ctt FORM- - 1) FRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: • t • go! 1 SCHEDULE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Y. • 2) PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST IN TMC 18.64.020): Truck terminal as defined by the City of Tukwila for 16,280 s.f. of warehouse space in Building B. * 9) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES USED, WHOLESALE/RETAIL/WAREHOUSE FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE STORAGE OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR OTHER 1NFORMAT1ON WHICH WILL FAC1L1TATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSE TO DEVELOP PN THIS SITE): lgcal and out of state distribution. The products requiring temperature control will be stored in a relatively small, movable outside storage container of preferably elec- trical operation. The noice level resulting from the operation of the refrigerated * DESCRIBE THE MAMIER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A CONDITIOUAL_USE PERMIT_-" WILL SATISFY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.64.p30 (ATTACH ADDtTICN- SHEETS tF NECESSARY)'. 1) THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR I MPROVE]mENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED USE OR IN THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED. RESPONSE: Above statement is true, in Westar's case this operation is distribution and warehousing of food products and conforms to other similar operations in the area. * 2) THE PROPOSED USE SHA- LL MEET OR EXCEED THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT IT WILL OCCUPY.' RESPONSE:-It is our intention to meet nr pxrpPrl all perfor,nap,rs st and Arcla rPr,�.irad in the district we will occupy. * 3) THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE GENERALLY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. RESPONSE: Does not apply - existing building. *-4) THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN. RESPONSE: It..is our intention to meet or exc d all .2ipprfnrmanra etandaxds requirprt in the district we will occupy. * container located outside the building would be considerably less than that of the truck and automobile traffic in the immediate area. ALL MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACTS WHICH THE PRO.. POSED •USE' M A X ; . H A V E CN ;THE AREA IN WHICH 1 1 . 1 S LOCATED. RESPONSE : i mexasiires- have been taken CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: E] BLDG [° ] PLNG P.W. (�'IFIRE I tiPOLIC ( P & R PROJECT4W.Qa5K - a.r0 rt �t. LOCATION /QQ7 6,16100- 4 $ cLue_, . 0A.± FILE NO. S - 6-8-f(,(iit) DATE TRANSMITTED / (2-1p'85 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /c2—/3-Ys- CN V5-3(0q EPIC ,1Q /-85 FILE '35-5-A--rap STAFF COORDINATOR fl gj f/ �.�I_ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT AREA OF CONCERN: SCHEDULE "D" PARA #3 DETAILED DESCRIPTION...PETITIONEER MENTIONS THE USE OF A SMALL MOVABLE OUTSIDE STORAGE CONTAINER FOR STORING ITEMS NEEDING REFRIG.-.ERATION. UNLESS THIS UNIT IS PROVIDED WITH EXTRAORDINARY SECURITY DEVICES...HIGH SECURITY LOCKS AND ALARM SYSTEM,IT WILL BE A TARGET FOR THE OPPORTUNIST TYPE BURGLAR. THE VERY MINIMUM SECURITY REQUIREMENT ON A UNIT OF THIS TYPE WOULD BE SPOTLIGHTING AND HIGH VISIBILITY ON THE SIDE PERMITTING ACCESS. 32/9/85 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN r•3(DCI EPIC ,lo /-8 FILE ?5.5 ?-0,140 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 1 TO: 171 BLDG PLNG P.W. �V1FIRE Frf POLICE ["j P & R PROJECT `Oe t. Ty a t cLGLC LOCATION 10Q7 (rl aly4) ALI& E L4. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 12-6915- 2-691 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /.:2 /3 -85 STAFF COORDINATOR a rf RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT �Ae�n�3 At/147;6 rink DATE /2 jo//eTS" COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN --3(f)(-1 EPIC ,10/-85 FILE 8 -58- -(LLp ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM BLDG TO: 171 BLDG j`�( PLNG P.W. [FIRE E POLICE ( P & R PROJECT LL2 LOCATION I QQ 7 (rth I'-&f) EC2A± DATE TRANSMITTED /c2—L 85 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY, /„v FILE NO. n 6-$1C,L( STAFF COORDINATOR si 4 ‘4 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE /2-7/.2-- �% COMMENTS PREPARED BY f�� C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 71 BLDG 11 PLNG rl P.W. (FIRE t' POLICE I'I P & R PROJECT CVL t. --r-rziy),port it(. LOCATION /010r7 (it 06-0), 4) V ado EciA± FILE N O . ' --- 6--8-6i(.All) CN V5-36(4 EPIC ,10 /-$5 FILE c85 5 -(L(,p DATE TRANSMITTED 1,2-& -,5',5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /? /3- '.5 STAFF COORDINATOR t/ a 4 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 11/9 cornm DATE / / 6 /6J. COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN ?5 -3( q EPIC ,1Q/-85 FILE ‘35-5-MLP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: [1 BLDG 171 PLNG P.W. I�FIRE (r] POLICE PROJECT tViatif,K TY2r'3po-r t itu_ LOCATION /0? (ij'l obLe) t0al,(io Et FILE NO. P & R ASS 58-Cup DATE TRANSMITTED /2-& --5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY h9-/3-85- STAFF COORDINATOR r( '�G RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW. AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE fle COMMENTS PREPARED BY0 C.P.S. Form 11