Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-305-85 - MCLEES GERALD - ANNEXATION AND ZONING AMENDMENTMCLEES ANNEXATION AND ZONING AMENDMENT 4526 S0. 135T" PL. EPIC - 305 -85 AFFIDAVIT Kathryn A. Stetson Q Notice of Public Hearing [[ Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline. Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action • Official Notice El O Other Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Fire District 18. 4237 So. 144th Seattle, WA 98168 Boundary Review Board King County Courthouse Room W378 Seattle, WA 98104 South Central School District #406 4640 South 144th Seattle, WA 98168 February 6, 1986 Terry Matelich Val Vue Sewer District P.O. Box 68063, Seattle, WA 98168 Water District 125 ,P.O. Box 68147 Seattle, WA 98168 Name of Project McLees Annexation /Zoning ktdittorYt) lif = aafT6-14) Amendment Signature File Number OFFICE MEMO CITY OF TUKWILA TO: FROM: Apt DATE: /1/6785-- SUBJECT: ! r�c Lees „, vat/ e-e( 4o 8V( Ph f oima )1-o EASEMENT FOR INGRESS El EGRESS The Grantors, MARREN NEUMOTH and ROSE MARIE NEUROTH, husband and wife, J. DAVID JENSEN and AMY JENSEN, husband and wife, and the FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN =SOHN.= CORFORAffTON, a corporation, for valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledgeL, do hereby grant, sell and convey to FRANK LINDELL and MARIAN LINDELL, husband and wife, and ELLING HALVORSEN and BARBARA HALVORSEN, husband and wife, their successors and assigns, an easement and right-of-way over, through, across and upon the following described real property situate in King County, Washdngton, to-wit: The southwest 10 feet of the northeast \, 282.12 feet of the southeasterly 92.25 feet of tract '15, Fostoria Garden Tracts according to the plat recorded in Vol. 9 of plats, page 95, in King Obunty, Washington. The purpose of said easement shall be for ingress and egress only and there shall be no parking allowed on said easement. This easement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the successors, heirs and arligns of all of the parties hereto. Dated this ,i‘ daY of 11#) , L 1973. Dated this -,D10 day of /(1)1'1-1k-- , 1973. 7" Pay R. 41M1811 Jenson / 14th dik k Federal Sainrjs 4 Dy; 1 Corpora -1- , 1973. 7305080375 TO National TitL ins. co, 719 Second Manus THE GRANTOR S, Statutory Warranty deed J. MVID =EN and Mfr N. JENSE7f, hie wife, km aad le c eidestNS d TEN DOLLARS AND ODER VAUJABIE BSI ERATION is fwd paid. cowers eat wsfwa to RPM R. I.DOELL and MARIAN B. LINDELL, his wife, arid !1L 4r IAWORSQI and BARBARA hAU/OPSQI, his wilt, Ow lotluuina dwctMad eel awe. diesel io dr Cows r KING it Kalaapaa: AS attached hereto and by reerince fade pert hereof. Iwa/ Ine 19th STATE OF WAMHO4GTtEi. Comity al latc S. d April, Ian Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Tract 15, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plate, page 95, in King County, Washington. Thence South 49• 43' East 90.94 feet; thence South 40.17' West 272.12 feet; thence North 49.43' West 183.19 feet to a point hereafter described as point "A "; thence South 40.17' West 10 feet; thence North 49.43' West 82.75 feet: thence North 40.17'East 282.12 feet; thence South 49943' East 30 feet; thence South 40.17' West 119 feet; thence South 49.43' East 130 feet; thence North 40.17' East 119 feet to a point hereafter described as point "B "; thence South 49943' East 15 feet to point of beginning. Together with an easement for footings over the followini; described portions of said Tract 15: Beginning at point "B" as heretofore described; thence South 40017' West 110 feet to true point of beginning; thence South 40.17' West 9 feet; thence North 49.43' West 100 feet; thence North 40.17' East 9 feat; thence South 49 °43' East 100 feet to the true point of beginning. This easement granted with the stipulation that gran. reserves the right to erect a building upon said easement utilizing the footings placed thereon for foundation support. Said footings shall be designed and oonstructed with excess capacity in consideration of said f.`ure building construction. The added load from any future bu. ding shall not cause the design capacity of the footings to be exceeded. And together with a non- exclustve easement for ingress and egress only over the following described portion of said Tract 15; Beginning at point "A" as heretofore described: Thence South 49943' East 92.2S feet; thence South 40 °17' West 10.00 . feet; thence North 49943' West 92.25 feet; thence North 40.17' East 10.00 feet to point of beginning and point "A ". Said premises being subject to the following easements reserved to the grantor: 1. beginning at point ",A ", as heretofore described; thence South 49.43'. East 92.25 feet; thence North 40917' East 43.12 feet; thence North 49.43' Vest 100.00 feet; thence North 40.17' East 110.00 feat; thence North 49.41' West 45.00 feet; thence South 40.17' West 183.12 feet; thence South 49.43' East 52.75 feet; thence North 40917' East 10.00 feet; to point "A" and point of beginning. Said easement for non- exclusive parking and access. 1 2. beginning at point "A ", as heretofore described; thence South 40 °17' VEst 10.00 feet; thence North 49 °43' West 52.75 feet to true point of beginning; thence North 49 °43' West 30.00 feet; thence North 40 017' Fast 282.12 feet; thence South 49 °43' East 30.00 feet; thence South 40 °17' West 292.12 feet to the true point of beginning. Said portion subject to an easement for driveway, land soaping. lighting, utility purposes. 3. beginniing at the most Easterly oorner of said Tract 15, and the true po.zt of beginning; thence North 49 °N.' West 15 feet: thence South 40.17' West 119 feet; thence South 490 ce 43' last 30 feet; thence North 40 °17' East 11° feet: thenc North 49 °43'. West 15 feet to true Toint of beginning. parc.a subject to o non - exclusive easement for acee[:s and utilities only. Said easement area shall not be used for parking or loaning. 4. Rregirning I.. Routh 49 043' South 49 °43' feet; thence 11' East 119 the most Easterly corner of sail'. Tract lb; thence East 15 feet to true point of hepinninc:thanoe East 75.94 feet; thence South 40 °17' Weat 119 North 49 °43' West 75.94 feet; thence North 40° feet to true point of beginning. Said pares) subject to a non - exclusive easement for.laading, parking, access and landscaping. King County Executive Tim Hill Department of Planning and Community Development Holly Miller, Director January 23, 1986 Mr. Brad Collins, Planning Director 6200 Southecenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: McLees Annexation /Rezone - City of Tukwila Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed the Environmental Checklist and support the Annexation /Rezone request. In addition, we have the following comments. iiQ6QOP7B ran 27 lees CITY Oi TUKWILA PLANNING an • The proposed use of the site differs from the Highline Community Plan residential designation, however, the plan designation simply reflected existing uses. Our main. interest siottid b fo sere the:residentiakar.et betwinnwill ishbi and: 48 f Avenue South otected: front/t or :. . Appropriate mitigation measures should be employed by Tukwila when approving the zoning and subsequent development proposal. Thereiens, and annexation+: is cbasistent: sith,thmICing•Cotsty Comprehensive Plan whiah:d tes the- City of 'I tdreila as: .asr.Urb Aclp ttty® Center, where commercial and industrial development should fixate, Sincerely, HOLLY MILLER Director HM:VN:am CP040 /MH cc: Steve Miller, Deputy Director, Planning and Community Development Department II ��'ATTN: Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator `Harold Robertson, Manager, Planning Division ATTN: Lois Schwennesen, Chief, Community Planning Section Vaughan Norris, Community Planner 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (2061 344.7503 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRI.UTION Wendy Bull hereby declare that: [[ Notice of Public Hearing [E Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of'Appeals Agenda Packet �[ Planning Commission Agenda Packet [� Short Subdivision Agenda Packet (� Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated Determination of Non- significance [[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [] Notice of Action 111 Official Notice [[ Notice of Application for [J Other Shoreline Management Permit El Shoreline Management Permit [L Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on January 8 , 1986. Director King County Department of Planning & Community Development 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section MS PV -11 Olympia, WA, 98504 Gerald M. McLees 4585 South 134th Place Tukwila, WA 98188 Name of Project McLees Rezone File Number EPIC - 305 -85 ,e42(-6(7 Signature f5tat WAC 197 -11 -970 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal McLees Annexation and Zoning Amendment Proponent Gerald McLees Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 4526 So. 135th P1. NE 4 15 -23 -4 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 305 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. El There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Thursday, January 23, 1986 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This determination is issued subject to the attached mitigating measures: Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date Signature i You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS January 7, 1986 Mitigation Measures EPIC- 305 -85 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 1. Development of site shall be subject -to Board of Architectural Review design review and approval. 2. Development of site will require the design and construction of a drainage system to connect the developed site with South 134th Place. 3. Access to subject property for any commercial /industrial development shall be restricted to South 134th Place. A legal easement for access shall be required to be created and recorded. ,CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUSING FORM TO: 1100 yr PROJECT ADDRESS BLDG. PLNG. PERMIT NUMBER P.W. 4'52( 3 _//35-& FIRE CONTROL NUMBER 525:13Q..6 POLICE Er/P. & R. DATE TRANSMITTED /7- -02-8e� RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 7)7 / ;G , RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED ❑ C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: fl BLDG. Elf PLNG. [ P.W. FIRE POLICE E P. & R. CONTROL NUMBER g5-7,50'`5 PROJECT I/ ..' .I % _. L _' 4 _ • ADDRESS y� -6 i' 4=35-..1/6 DATE TRANSMITTED ,2-8 j RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 16- 9- C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 99gV ,J o,,A6l RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE . SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED [� PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - R TING FORM CONTROL NUMBER 05:Q6 TO: d BLDG. PLNG. ( P.W. rf FIRE POLICE ["P. & R. PROJECT t' a/A4) ��' /L!/ii i,a1'I Q� ADDRESS 952( /35 DATE TRANSMITTED - 8� RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 749/Q/ I/1 aik1 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ▪ ANNEXATION /REZONE WILL HAVE NO MEASURABLE IMPACT UPON POLICE SERVICES. ❑ DEPENDING UPON THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE POLICE SERVICES MAY ❑ BE IMPACTED TO A SIGNIFICANT DEGREE. ❑ ]/3/86 pjl ❑ D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED J PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED ❑ PLAN APPROVED (] PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER iP CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUIiNG FORM TO: BLDG. Ef PLNG. P.W. FIRE PROJECT ADDRESS y5�(g J DATE TRANSMITTED C CONTROL NUMBER 8� 3Q� POLICE El/P, & R. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 2aca Visa ,s RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: U o -K 6 4.p c.+' F P.. cp-p,e� c:) -v.. 6 D. ❑ \Dual (544 e:tOW4J2iet Witt(). ( -eLe4,4.J 4ei tet ❑ i' /ia6 i )35 ). a e (i, 571p5" Q )36/ ) o aloud, , ,5ap`nJi" / 2 i�iG ia/ia, Cd. O W L-64 ( � ' i 2� t e3 2 7 t' c.c.0 Q (i/4) .fnULt. O L-au:61, ($./B.5-v- /24 ❑ Liadeyra Cit),0r� zm & ❑ . /0 41,4tvitalI1 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED ❑ PLAN APPROVED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE //-- 3 ` ekS COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 `CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUI TO: fl BLDG. PLNG. i% ''c W. rf FIRE rirPOLICE EP. & R. PROJECT ADDRESS '/524' DATE TRANSMITTED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 99749/al Vi Q PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER F51,.-5Q.1)--- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY, RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ ? ) c � 1-Th -IT. 1 ' ' 43, 4) t-rem - J , b ❑ COrn/ (Nt.) LLS . 'Dry IFLo P rnrNir cpc.C,t q t.& cm p 14As --rug n pp kn P k.vf-r -D4 t kde ❑ 'rl k's r)-1\I - i..a0113 3 n 34 - s PrAkt_ i ct . ❑ ❑ 0 a ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED p PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED p PLAN APPROVED p PLAN CHECK DATE // COMMENTS PREPARED BY 6 6- C.P.S. FORM 2 Contr *o. 55'395- Epic File No. 305=86- ' + Fee $100.00 Receipt No. '>,,I'� ENV IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 'y "` • Pt `.:,.. �, �.:�„ DEPT . �`? sr►� te/ 3 , A. BACKGROUI�(Q�` �r�N�/lT(oti (z It 'S-49 v AG11 M L-0T ) 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: No ppl y 2. Name of applicant: Gerald M McLees 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4585 So. 134th Pl _ 242 -7129 4. Date checklist prepared:December..20, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Not apply 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Warehouse and parking 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA$ III Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep("sl mountainous, other b. What is the steepest lope on the site (ap roximate percent slope)? 6° (Us ,QC (iPsto St 'f- c. What general types. of soils are found on the site J (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification.of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. c]ay Sand and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling is antiC 4.f - p-rOjR -Ct ,-S prnnnsnd f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N • • .. _ . grade as thPrp is nnw same g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not apply as nn prnj'rt iS prnpoced at-this—time. • -4- CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER I CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM TO: ri BLDG. 16 PLNG. ( P.W. FIRE POLICE ElrP. & R. CONTROL NUMBER '4;2-0(-4.4.5 PROJECT ADDRESS y :2(p 3 435- DATE TRANSMITTED (//--,„27,F5- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 977, / l av Ati 1 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED ❑ PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY r._p_s_ FnPM 9 :•,N":r "Ci DEPT. A. BACKGROUND- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Contr( No. 55'395 J Epic File No. 3O5-85T Fee $100.00 Receipt No. '2133 2. Name of applicant: Gerald M McLees Not apply 6i /Vi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and cont Gt-• ,r-so 4585 So. 134th Pl _ 242 -7129 4. Date checklist prepared:December 20, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Not apply 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Warehouse and parking 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None c� c 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. For annex — Tukwila City Council and King County Review Board For zoning— Tukwila City Council and Tukwila City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. _PrQRaa 1J s to be annexed inti_Tukwilt an &x zoned to M1_nt_the__ same ti We have _no_sp cific project in mind at this time. 46-9(.0 ,:.1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. _Legal description and survey map _attached. I . k 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA. C Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, stee slopes; mountainous, other b. What is the steep st slope on t�a site ( approximate percent slope) ?, 6° ,e/ %, /, c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. clay sand and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No_ fi llinj is anticapate i f -a--p ec _i_s prnpose_d f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Nc wa Sarni 1 A nrnhal 11 y u sc generally the Sdine grar1 a s 1- hp i s _nnw g. About what percent of the site will' be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not apply as nn prnjPrf is proposed at-thi-s- -time. -4- h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None at this time 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? ,If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None at this time b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. a Non e�i',�t' .ff ,,� i 5 I tomWJ Y'1 r)6(4 5 Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air., if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.: No -5- b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Na 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. —II a project is hiii] t there -would- water run off from p. wed Area _th.at_ woul,ct_run-- rn toss o rm Evaluation for Agency Use Only H' Evaluation for 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not known at this time b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not known at this time 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No Agency Use Only 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not known at this time 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Not apply �~. Evaluation for b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which/may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, per4/42n, other) ?_ 4P None __ _r 0/047...0 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None at this time 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Nothing _on. site. Acljagent is sales_/and 1 i ght manufaat xia% .0 5/ >late 4- b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Nn c. Describe any structures on the site. Nona Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the site? R urrent zoning classification of the s 67rPZ i af' a.ri 179,g, f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family (4 -6 per acre) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not apply g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Unknown because no project is proposed at this time. j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NOt apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 1 �`a The site is boardered on two sides by M1 f�, . 0 11 property. When developed it will be compatable with M1 zoning designation. / X11 51 0 1. '611 hiPP Aletit "11:436 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4=i-ez) ca) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Nonp b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? _Uft as sperifip1 in procu ia_ an - 743 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only -13- CEvaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No way of knowing until specifies projecd: is planned b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? —Same as above c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? same as above d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not apply 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None rveri b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not apples -14- a if c 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national,' state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? ' If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not apply 14. Transportation Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. South 135th and South 134th Pl. ' i'1"/ (lf/lej I DID 4;52 t; b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes approx 50 ft. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ Unknown.._ at this time c 4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, ,� �P or improvements to existing roads or streets, not �/+/°�►� including driveways? If so, generally describe A ()iG&te—wt1ether public or private). NO ( 1.0,'"/"" e. Will the project, use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No_ f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. iinkrr� _ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Not apply 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not apply (1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use im acts as. part of shoreline C t .044716-47NO: /4/?G& How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not apply 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on sf transportation or public services and utilities? .� � /(A- This pxoposal would make no demnr3c - ?t. l~ .,1'v 2, } , WI/ Ltoi me_es Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not apply 1. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not apply -20- 4RINGS 'Y FILED /N 800K 14 OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE 64, UNDER RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE NO. 78081/9004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTr WASH INGTON. / • 1. • 0 LE_ FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT //y �0. b a • , SET 4 � REBAR IN AUGUST 1978 / fIG. , j* ? / 1 / / /,1/ P0 / / /J a /7' ti ./o \ea 1t`/ /'/ vy ah' / i - / JULY 1984 14)/`1\1 k,,+ 'I' i� ' a' SET 2 REBAR N �1. /;�y 1 � a� - \I' ` / �, ete /101 (>4‘ ^‹ cs, ..., ( ,-- F /ELD BOOK NO. 108 Y 0 / - 6A- /q, h yy0 ° �a' F8. /�0 0t P �it oa so 0 / a�. • 0 0 0 a` ■ 4G0q . Jao 09 ti . a y ,0 a a°t • 0 �P �titi' \3h . a er 1 4RINGS FILED IN 800K 14 OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE 64, UNDER RECORDER'S CLLR ` /GATE NO. 7808119004, RECORDS OF K1N6 COUNTr / /, /0 /Q Jai /41 00 /o A°a ,t, LEGEND ▪ FOUNO CONCRETE MONUMENT • SET 4. REBAR IN AUGUST 1978 0 SET �Z - RESAR IN JULY 1984 F /ELD 800K NO. 108 6 1 WASNI NG TOM / /P a00 a 1 'S / 1,4`11, 0*/ 14 1 42) 1,4‘. 0 • Ns J�, G o o- 1% _...- Y /3 h y� �� y y 0 0 0� 00 �J� 000\ �l 0 t 1)1 - tiL -y day F' ■ �9 • '.fSry F ,P A. 0 • VI1 - -1 2 :3 985 s a 2 --- -----� Con o 1 No. 1,�'J7' 57 Epic File No. 305—'86— Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 'x.183 CITY 3T f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Z,FatA 124411e6 PlAr117,1 DEPT. A. BACKGROU D 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 'NotYapply 2. Name of applicant: Gerald M McLees 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4585 So 134th Pl. 242 -7129 4. Date checklist prepared:December_.20,, 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Not apply 7. Do you have. any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ,Warehouse and parking 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. For annex - Tukwila City Council and King County Review Board For zoning - Tukwila City Council and Tukwila City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. _Proposal _is ± _e_ exd intQ__Tukwila_ ansl_ €z.4 _to ML at tile- same We have .rio specific project in mind at this time. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Legal description and survey map atta _ched. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. G 'i %i glwir (ti) -3- ; :r 2 3 i93r TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLILPNT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, stee . slopes mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 6° c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. clay sand and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No_ fi llin —is anticapaten if _a n rt -i.s prnpnSe`l f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No We wrlli l d probably use generally +-he same grade as there is nnw Evaluation for Agency Use Only g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not apply AR nn prnjPrt i s proposed at -th-is -mime. -4- _ 9 L, ,[.E 2 3 1985 Pi AN :r.:!:!(3 f.)E.PT. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None at this time 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,' dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None at this time b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only D(J ,� r- �ti � f ' 4 J 1 CITY 0:: T1 :•,v li..A l't r^ l\ N ;G DEPT. • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None -6- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Ii) l ._ l r) C231985I CITY A P.I \N: :t7.3 DEp-r. • • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. _.If a project is built thPrn - wou1-d- water run off f rom_ p ved area that would -run- intn_stnrm dirain _ -7- Evaluation for Agency Use Only [DEC 2 3 1985 DEPT.ti . a Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None at this _t:_im€.— 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: xx deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other xx evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other xx-shrubs xx grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ,Tone at this time c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None at this time 9 ;? 1:; -8- r1i • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: pr y al i s hol 1 y fir cedar_ ai nine already on site. JiQ other ans attli' s time_ 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: NOne b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. _io d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only tDEC 2 3.1985. Ci:Yi. ".: Tl:,.V ILA Pi r.1v'r:?;:G DEPT. • Evaluation for 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not known at this time b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not_known at this time 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not known at this time 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Not apply -10- Agency Use Only ,,,;,ig;5 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate' what hours noise would come from the site. Non at this time 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Nothing_ site,__Ad,ja.ent is sales_and light manufacturing. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Nn c. Describe any structures on the site. Nnne Evaluation for Agency Use Only k PiAliNE, LZ Q'E T Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R S f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family (4 -6 per acre) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Unknown because no project is proposed at this time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NOt apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The site is boardered on two sides by M1 property. When developed it will be compatable with M1 zoning designation. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? Non P b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? _1 f t as spPr.i f i Pd in mukw1Ja—Ordinan 743 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No way of knowing until specific pr oiect is planned b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Sam' as above c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? same as above d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not apply 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not apply • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. South 135th and South 134th P1. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes approx 50 ft. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ Unknown at this time Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. _unknnwn g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Not apply 15. Public Services a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not apply Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricitykhatural gas ater CrefUse servic ephones sanitar sewers 'septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Unknown C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: ��,� ` / ,_ ��3 j q TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL NT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? _ ;. _ planned at this time Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not apply 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,.ani- mals, fish, or marine life? None. If developed,; any impact would be kept to a minimum. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: All possible trees would be kept on property. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Only by the amount of electricity needed and heating source needed. None of natural resources Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Would have no effect Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Mould have no Pffpct • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Not part or shoreline_. Fnr annex and rezone there woLld be no impact. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not apply 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal would make no demandG- Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not apply 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not apply • • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Not aware of any conflict Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not apply Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI T • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To annex to Tukwila as two boardering pieces of property are and also to change zoning to MI-so as to be compatable with the two properties. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternate means that we know of. to accomplish this objective. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not apply Evaluation for Agency Use Only >/ 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Not aware of any conflict Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not apply -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4R /NGS Y FILED /N BOOK 14 OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE 64, LINDER RECORDER'S /CERTIFICATE NO. 7808119004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASFIINGTON. / / / /.4� / / Ja Q/�00 / sj o / q. S+ /pQQ�` ,y4r � LEGEND / *5, o a\ iv./ `000 ;i• FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT /Pg a0- 4// • 4 ' IN AUGUST 1978 /� 0� / ' h1 / • SET 'z ,QEBAR / /�� ,�1v , / a / o SET �2 - RESAR .1N JULY 1984 ,SAS /y III' : :' ` , a; a / sb/ to �x -\ 0. yam? /1'tif. / 1 / QQ' OV y� o� p�� a. 'I / h� �J PJ j 92 o� a�'/ tit/ aa/ C) c.)0 o� h1 ti /99 / // OQ �Pyh�1� 0 o ` as 90 <s �• / a1ti o is- /, / / GO Ja gj • y1 / / / �� �k q. by T ,610 titia0 �a ; a VI to / O or fig' ?►ati • / FIELD BOOK NO. 108 1 • 1' AA a - Mr c—■ .. ITf • Attachment Gerald M McLees 4526 So 135th. Seattle Wa. 98168 Policy No. 48u670 EXHIBIT "I" That portion of Tract 14 of Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 9 ot Plats; on page 95, in King County Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of said Tract 14; thence Southwesterly along Northwesterly boundary of said Tract 14,.a distance of 494.52 feet to Southwest corner ot said tract which point is also the North line of 135th Street (ALSO KNOWN AS Foster Street); thence Southeasterly along said margin of county road, 95.38 feet; thence Northeasterly along the line parallel with said Northwesterly boundary of said tract, 472.12 feet to the Northeasterly boundary ot said tract; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly boundary; 90.24 feet to the Point of Beginning; EXCEPT therefrom the Northeast 272.12 feet thereat; and EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within South 135tn Street I DEC 2 31985 1 CITY Cti Tt.:... A :LA Pt A,P,_N! G DEPT "CITY OF TU NILA • Central Permit System 8 &/ -/e MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEG IBLYCRTYPE ALL REQUESTED ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING..' INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: QBSIP QSH �SN�RR�ITE 0PRD �PMUD QT PERM 0 COND1TIONAL USE APPLICANT: NAME DUNCLASS• USE Gerald M. McLees 4585 S. 134th P1.. ADDRESS PROP. OWNER: NAME 0 VARIANCE oBAR INTERURBAN I 7'CNG. OP ("Comm PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT TELEPHONE (206 ) 242-7129 zip 98168 same as above TELEPHONE ADDRESS PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 4526 So. 135th ) ZIP SECTION it :. PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY. THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE, The zoning of a piece of property proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila. 5) 6) 8 ) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED, IN PHASES? N/A FROM YES N/A NO TO IF YES, DESCRIBE: PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NETS 18,673 s.f. EASEMENTS B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL1/FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR'AREA C) SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING R'IALLS: -STANDARD S r=E - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE N/A INCLUDES• BASEMENT D MEZZANINE INCLUDES: BASEMENT El MEZZANINE EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES SR M -1 Light Industrial (Tukwila existing) ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? � YES NO 'SECTION 111: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT EXISTING'ZONI G SR," King County' REQUESTED ZONING M -1 Light Industrial (Tukwila) COMP.. PLAN DESIGNATION SITE IN CITY LIMITS? No requested to be annexed no change in use proposed PROPOSED' USE W" - I F REZONE 'APPROVED EXISTING USE/AND CLASSIFICATION OF SURROUNDING NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST ZONE (T)' M -1. (KCj SR (T) M -1 (KC) RS -7200 COMP. PLAN DESIG.. Light Industrial Light Industrial Light Industrial Low Density Resid. PROPERTIES:.. USE :: Industrial Single Family (4534 S. 134th P1) Industrial (4611 S. 134th P1) Single Family .ESG'RIBE'THE MANNER IN WHICH YOUR REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONING CLASSIFICATION SATISFIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.84.030 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECES- SARY). 1) THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE AND LAND USE POLICY PLAN, THE PROVISION OF THE CITY ZONING CODE AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST. RESPONSE: The proposed M -1 zoning district would be in compliance with the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 2) THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING IS APPROPRIATE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE ZONING AND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES (.IN ADDITION TO THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE, SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SHOULD BE REFERENCED ). . RESPONSE:. The uses adjacent to the subject parcel are industrial and single family. 3) IF THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING IS NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN, THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE IS CITED IN SUPPORT OF THE NEED FOR THE REQUESTED RECLASSIFICATION. RESPONSE: