Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-306-85 - CITY OF TUKWILA - METRO ETS / STORM DRAIN OUTFALLS, MINI PARK AND PARKING LOTMETRO ETS TWO STORM DRAIN OUTFACES, MINI PARK & PARKING LOT 13500 INTERURBAN AVE. EPIC 306 -85 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Brad Collins Rebecca Fox February 13, 1986 SUBJECT: 85 -63 -SMP The light nearest to the mini park will be a 400 watt sodium vapor street lamp on a 40 foot pole. It will be located at the northwest corner of the mini -park. According to Mike Osmondson of William G. Teufel and Associates (project land- scape architects), the light will provide approximately 1 foot candle (fc) of illumination at a distance of 75 feet from the standard. This distance rep- resents the farthest edge of the mini-park;.other closer -in locations will presumably receive more intensive light. Byron Sneva, Tukwila Public Works Director, calculated illumination of 5.2 fc directly below the luminaire and 3.2 fc at the farthestcorner of the mini - park. Either of these calculations appears to fall within the recommended 1/2 to 5 fc range for foot paths. Additionally, some supplemental spillover lighting will be provided at a later date from the parking lot addition which parallels the waterfront. Given the information, we feel that lighting currently planned is adequate to ensure the safety of park users. No plans revisions are required to provide on -site lighting per the Planning Commission staff. report 85 -63 -SMP, Recommendation #2. /wb 11 mEThD „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 January 27, 1986 Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit Application Dear Ms. Fox: JAN 3 01986 CITY OF TUKWit,q PLANNING APT. Metro staff has reviewed the application and offers the following comments. Water Quality Metro has designated the Green River and the Duwamish River as major waters of regional concern where the protection of water quality is a high priority. To protect the water quality in the area of the proposed outfalls, mini -park and parking lot both during and after construction, Metro recommends the proponent: o identify the wetland areas and runoff discharge points from the parking lot and mini -park and install erosion control measures such as siltation fences and straw bales to prevent increases in turbidity; and o prevent petrochemicals and other pollutants from entering surface waters. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and review. Very truly yours, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:dww RMIIIIND I JAN 27 1986 CITY OF TUKW1u PLANNING DEPT. *METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 January 23, 1986 Brad Collins, Planning Director 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Non - Significance (Mitigated) 306 -85: City of Tukwila Dear Mr. Collins: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant adverse impacts to wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and review. Very truly yours, 4/Ai/A0._ ?e‘------- tillegory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:plw King County Executive Randy Revelle Department of Planning and Community Development Holly Miller, Director January 22, 1985 Mr. Brad Collins Planning Director City of, Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Two Storm Drain Outfalls and Parking Lot MDNS, S126 Dear Mr. Collins: The Department of Planning and Community Development has reviewed the MDNS. Without project plans or drawings, it was difficult to address specific comments toward the project. We appreciate the opportunity, however, to make the following general comments. Direct Discharge The project as proposed would utilize storm drains rather than retention ponds. Because they offer better storm water and pollution control, retention ponds should be considered as an alternative. Pollution Control Water pollutants from the proposed parking lots along with other upland impervious areas could runoff to the Duwamish River. Yet this MDNS fails to discuss adequate water pollutant controls. Oil and water separators and the use of natural vegetation should both be evaluated to control pollution from surface water runoff. If you have any questions, please call Tim Krause at 344 -7503. Sincerely, 4 5' HM:mg24 HOLLY MILLER Director cc: Steve Miller, Deputy Director, Department of Planning and Community Development ATTN: Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator Bryan Glynn, Manager, Building and Land Development Division ATTN: Ralph Colby, Supervisor, Plan Implementation Section Harold Robertson, Manager, Planning Division ATTN: Bill Jolly, Chief, Resource Planning Section 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-7503 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Planning Branch • • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX C -3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-2255 Brad Collins, Director Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: JAN 2 1 1986 We have reviewed the determination of nonsignificance for the proposed construction at 13500 Interurban Avenue, Tukwila, Washington, with respect to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' areas of special expertise and jurisdiction by law as designated by the President's Council on Environmental Quality on December 21, 1984. The Duwamish River is a navigable water of the United States and subject to the Corps of Engineers regulatory authority under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899. For information about specific permit requirements, please contact the Seattle District Regulatory Functions Branch at the above address or by telephone, (206) 764 -3495. Thank you for the opportunity to review the determination of nonsignificance. Sincerely, GEORGE W. PLOUDRE, P.E. Asst Chief, Engineering Division ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 January 17, 1986 Mr. Brad Collins City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: [MUD JAN 211986 CITY OF k% A PLANNING DEPT. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the development of a mini park and a 106 car parking lot at 13500 Interurban Avenue. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If any work is done in the water, a short -term exception to the water quality standards may be required from the Department of Ecology. Information on this requirement is available from the Southwest Regional Office, 7272 Cleanwater Lane, Olympia, WA 98504 (telephone 753- 2353). If you have any questions, please call Ms. Linda Rankin of the Shorelands Division at (206) 459 -6763. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc Linda Rankin WILLIAM R. WILKERSON Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753 -6600 • (SCAN) 234 -6600 January 16, 1986 Mr. Brad Collins City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: JN 2 N 21 1986 ERNE OF TUKWILA NNING DEPT. Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance for Storm Drain Outfall and Mini -Park, Green River - Duwamish River, Fisheries Control Number 00251, WRIA B- 09.0001 One of the major impacts to rivers and streams in urban areas is the intro- duction of pollutants such as oils, heavy metals, phosphates, etc. These pollutants enter the rivers and streams through storm runoff systems. Most runoff systems are designed using underground pipe leading to either under- ground detenion vaults or detention ponds designed to prevent downstream flooding. Unfortunately, even with oil /water separators, these systems concentrate pollutants then discharge them to the receiving waters. Therefore, it is necessary to provide some means, in addition to the standard oil /water separator, to remove the pollutants typical of urban runoff. This can be accomplished by designing shallow grass -lined swales leading to open detention ponds. The detention pond must be large enough to allow the establishment of vegetation within it that will create a bio- filter. We also wish to emphasize that a Hydraulic Project Approval will be required prior to the start of work on the banks of the Green River. Thank you for the the opportunity to review this proposal. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact me at (206) 753 -2980. Sincerely, ;7 Joseph L. Robel, Habitat Manager Habitat Management Division JLR:mr cc: Game A F F I Ill VIT I, Wendy Bull El Notice of Public Hearing • Notice of Public Meeting [1, Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [] Board of'Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet • Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [� Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit OF DIST'RI�T30N hereby declare that: [l Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated Determination of Non - significance �[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [] Notice of Action [[ Official Notice [l Other [[ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on U.S Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District NPSEN -PL -RP P.O. Box C -3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Washington State Department of Fisheries 115 General Administration Building Olympia, WA 98504 Jaunuary 8, 1986 Director KIng County Department of Planning & Community Development 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section MS PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Name of Project Metro ETS: STorm Drains, mini park &.parking lot. File NumberEPIC- 306 -85 Byron G. Sneva City of Tukwila Director of Public Works Shirley Marraquin Metro MS 92 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal parking lot. MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Two storm drain nutfalls, a mini -park, and a 106 car Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 13500 Interurban Avenue NW* 14 -23 -4 on west bank of Duwamish River upstream from the 56th Avenue Bridge. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 306 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with . the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Q There is no comment period for this DNS (J This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Wednesday, January 22, 1986 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This determination is issued subject to the following mitigation measures. Please see attached sheet. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 1-7—gc, Signature `�ru- n . C a`"O You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS January 7, 1986 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor Mitigation Measures EPIC - 306 -85 1. Prevent any damage to Joseph Foster Tree through identification of and construction of temporary barrier around tree. 2. Maintain access to Golf Course parking lot and club house during construction with a temporary access point south of existing one. 5 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER n■gCa CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - RVv(ING FORM TO: [f- BLDG. PLNG. (P.W. Ef FIRE (POLICE L1 r. b R. PROJECT 72070 E.-2 15 ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR ' RESPONSE RECEIVED RESPONSE REQUESTED B PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: /itt6/1W /x4V la46.0 -r- CI D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ 4/64.0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED [Er PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY A', C.P.S. FORM 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Con( 1 No. 05-1--0,q4'9 Epic File No.��� Fee $100.00 Receipt No. Construct two (2) storm drain outfalls, 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: mini -ark A parking lot_ 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Byron G. Sneva, Director of Public Works 433 -1855 4. Date checklist prepared: December 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): April - September 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Shoreline Permit No. 85-02-S1;113-METRO EFFLUENT TRANSFER SYSTEM Construction Documents ETS 3 -D 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. King County Flood Control Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. These storm drain outfalls are replacements for older ineffective existing storm drain systems on nts which are being relocated and imporved at this me in orllpr to rnnctru-_ the ETS Pipeline and appurtenances described in— ShoreTine Permit Nom 85- 02 -SMP. Additionally, a parking lot and a mintpark are to be constructed to serve patrons of the City of Tukwi 1a. Golf Course. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13500 Interurban Avenue; N.W. 1/4 Sec. 14 -23 -4 King County M1. on City of Tu wial Municipal Golf Course Shore i e. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes - shoreline zone TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, FLAT Flat, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty Sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Slight chance at river bank excavation for outfall and during the landscaping_ About what percent of the site will be covered with . impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NONE (parking lot exists @ site along with existing street and sidewalk surfaces) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE [4' "/ ail / 7 '. 6 Oef r- o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. FronOnterurban Avenue over existing golf course parking iot. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes - 50 feet c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NONE, NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OF TUKWILA //CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - RPING FOR TO: ri BLDG. tf PLNG. PROJECT c- i -naY11 F1" ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED /-2--1)25- -2 ?5- C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR ' va-de RESPONSE RECEIVED PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER Wg,TCG�60 Ef FIRE POLICE !J r. & R. RESPONSE REQUESTED B 11713 PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: P.2 fL300 C-61,11-NIL ❑ T-EilW i £ T.I-IEft 1 ITS . C.lr.1 LI s t IT 1R\i j'2.0y O SNmI A LET/ &ib MOTzo � A3 P�PQL1'fSLU _ (] bTNi N- (--`tv cI ; MAN B3-- 44)45U44 I 1 felon flS4 -a1n ❑ '$' iDa4i, (0 bev v� ❑ -Poi'- oak( 6061.11- u.I , ❑ 6490y12,1110� radfre,6 ❑ Q Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED D PLAN CHECK DATE 1 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ COMMENTS PREPARED B PLAN APPROVED [] C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM — RANG FORM • TO: BLDG. tlr PLNG. I P.W. Er FIRE (POLICE 1 P. b R. PROJECT (4-y),07-0 E-T"3 ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED 44 /-0?- ?J -- RESPONSE REQUESTED B l -6-8.3 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR ' ViCt,eli RESPONSE RECEIVED CONTROL NUMBER 0 ak° PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ___eLr4o:v. ❑ Q — - -- — Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED PLAN CHECK DATE /x/76 COMMENTS PREPARED BY ,-r,^-,c2- ,40.,. --� C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - INFO•ION TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM PROJECT ML M) .FT ADDRESS STAFF REVIEWER Control # y> Gxo Perm i t /File # BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE TRANSMITTED TO THE APPLICANT /DEVELOPER. ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 j CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer L I contacted applicant /developer (name) on (date) 0 Please follow -up with me on my concerns by (date) CPS FOLLOW -UP E] Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on (date) Distributed copy of letter to file #s: Comments Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence to staff person and appropriate files. CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER M.PCO CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - KUUTING FORM TO:, ri BLDG. rf PLNG. E(P.W. Ef FIRE 1 POLICE P. & R. PROJECT -172ar7) ,_:""3 ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED -saf C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR ✓�Ct,� RESPONSE REQUESTED B( f- 41,5- RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 0 DUE TO AN INSUFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION AND MAPS....COMMENT WOULD NOT BE 0 0 0 �697(1daf p )0n 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME. 1/3/86 Pjl 660/Aucsi, Q a a D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - RUufING FORM TO: BLDG. rir PLNG. PROJECT j>'77) 2:F;,7-6 P.W. FIRE POLICE CONTROL NUMBER '57-Da6p . &R. ADDRESS �--- DATE TRANSMITTED %-.?1?5" RESPONSE REQUESTED B l --64 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR oa.,e9 '�l(,� RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ 1.1 o-.-sLci — �34_e. t 0- .ham cr_ e ¢ �.c1 - . Lo-LX.K A✓J.Le ❑ -1 ©SN b4 1 lAn S\ A e ❑ u^,,.- C ■p 0 CC • 0 0 CLI2,6 0- ./w)..11_a ---..t 4 u-v■ at...k.-tCSL--1-•-e_s C_C)-0-tk_SIZ, Ci__Q_ p>.-c—Q_Q_c_-, __ , . Q 0 Q Q Q 0 Q ❑ Q Q ❑ ❑ Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED ❑ PLAN APPROVED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE /- - SS- COMMENTS PREPARED BY /._h_e C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER F5-- CgCa CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - RUaING FORM ( TO: I BLDG. PLNG. [ P.W. Ef FIRE (POLICE . b R. PROJECT ..t 7) 2E:7_76 ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED /-2-'J RESPONSE REQUESTED B( i-6-g3- C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR , Via zde e RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ ~ 'f — ;#Afo5 4.44 1° ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [i PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor M EMORANDUM TO: Byron Sneva FROM: Moira Bradshaw 1-18 DATE: December 2, 1985 SUBJECT: ETS Project The staff of the Department of Ecology has confirmed that any improvements not actually shown on the site plans or explained in detail in the original ETS Shoreline Permit 85- 02 -SMP must be included in subsequent application(s) for construction in the shoreline areas. Please review the plans submitted for Shoreline approval against actual construction plans. I am aware of several items that need a shoreline substan- tial development permit: 1. Outfall modification at 42nd Street. 2. New Outfall at 56th Avenue 3. Construction of a parking area at Foster Golf Course. 4. Sidewalk, bike path, landscaping within 200 feet of Green River. The time period involved in processing a shoreline permit is approximately three months. Please allow adequate lead time. (ETS) (1B) • A. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ConiTol No. 7571069 Epic File No. :P�g� Fee $100.00 Receipt No. Construct two (2) storm drain outfalls, 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:_ mini- arp k & rking lot_ 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Byron G. Sneva, Director of Public Works 433 -1855 4. Date checklist prepared: December 1985 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): April - September 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Shoreline Permit No. 85- 02 -SMP -METRO FFFFUENT TRANSFER SYSTEM Construction Documents ETS 3 -D 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. King County Flood Control Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. These storm drai1 outfalls re replacements for older ineffective existing storm drain systems components which are being relocated and imporved at this time in order to cnnstruct the ETS Pipeline and-appurtenances described in Shoriline Permit No. 85- 02 -SMP. Additionally, a parking lot and a min -park are to be constructed to serve_p trons of the City of Tukwila Golf Course. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13500 Interurban Avenue; N.W. 1/4 Sec. 14 -23 -4 King County WA. on City of Tukwial MunicipAL Golf Course Shoreline. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's ComprehensiveLand Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes = s.hQre] i ne zone TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only d: ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other FLAT b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty Sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. —Tor e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Slight chance at river bank excavation for outfall and during the landscaping. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NONE (parking lot exists @ site along with existing street and sidewalk surfaces) • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Riverbank will be protected by quarry rock Rip -Rap in conformance with King County Flood Control Standards, and with completed landscaping_ 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment exhaust - 2 weeks construction period. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Maintain construction site wetted to prevent dust. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year= round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Duwamish River approximately 9.2 miles up- stremfrom Puget Sound. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, construct storm drain outfall on river bank - flood control plan attached. and landscaping plan 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site - plan. Yes - river bank 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water run -off from residential (85%) commercia5. areas through existing built -up system consisting of on -site retention _install ions and street catch Tasins - €hougg out -Tails to Duwam sh Diver to Puget Sound. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Only those from storm run -off. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Catch basins in streets and parking lots, retention systems in commercial and multiple dwellinj develp- ments. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: , aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? River bank brush tree approximated 30' in width and 50' long. de c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Replant with native brush in the Eck Rip -Rdpnd formal landscape planters. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: eagle, songbird other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass other: herring, shellfish, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Salmon d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE - not disturbed Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Various for manufacturing of pipe, quarry_tark— b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Nn c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Slialjt chance of fuel or oil Spillage from construction equipment. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Soak blankets, floating boom 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Keep construction equipment far enough from river to prevent drainage. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation other)? _ NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Riverbank in out -of- bounds and open space area of municipal golf course. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. Maintenance shed, clubhouse, residence structures exist on the golf course property but not in the construction area of the storm drain improvements. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Golf Course h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Shoreline 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? /ONE j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible ,with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Riverbank and existing ground restoration to existing condition and improved landscaping with two seating benches. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Below grp9und headwall in riverbank. Cast iron manhole cover:and two seating benches. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Replant exposed riverbank, Ani install formal landscaping with two seating benches. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views ?_ N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NIA 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Golf course bicycle trail. River front mini park.(viewing point with two seating benches)_ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NONE REQUIRED Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Fro) nterurban Avenue over existing golf course parking iot. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes - 50 feet c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?____ NONE, NONE • . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities • a. C'rcle utiliti s currentl available at the site: t. •as, (refuse service,) telephone, anitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NONE C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I l•erstand the lead agency is relying on them to •.ke i •-.ision. Signature: Date Submitted: /Z /23/8' Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1.0 BE COMPLETED BY APPAL. • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To better facilitate the removal of surface water run -off from Interurban Avenue South and adjacent areas by upgrading the storm drain system and outfalls. Enhance the golf course frontage through improved landscaping and increasing parking stalls. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Establishing increased capacity of the storm drain system may be accomplished by water retention ponds. Landscaping and increasing parking in a specific area has no alternative means to achieve an objective i.e. Either you landscape or you do not. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Storm Drains vs. Retention_Ponds: Water run -off will eventually have to return to the river, therefore, an outfall is obviously required for any alternative retention ponds take up much more space and are a maintenance_ problem. _It is therefore, preferred to use a direct route of run -off to the river, Evaluation for Agency Use Only • rr Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? NO Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- CITY OF T •WILA �o Central Permit System'��� MASTER LAID DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR.TYPE ALL REQUESTED 1NFORMATICN -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. • SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: 0881P 35.001 APPLICANT: 0 SNORT PLAT 0 SUBDIVISION 0 CONOITIONAL QUNCLASS. USE USE ®SNORELINE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE c3PRO O PMUD QCMG. OF Q COMP. PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT BAR INTERURBAN NAME City of Tukwila TELEPHONE (206 ) 411 -1855 ADDRESS 6200 Southcenter B.lvd., Tukwila, Washingtno ZIP 98188 PROP. OWNER: NAME City of Tukwila TELEPHONE (206 ) 433 -1855 ADDRESS 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington zip 98188 PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) 13500 Interurban Avenue 11 .1. . 11 n •u Duwa 11 Rive SECTION 11: PROJECT 1NFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YQU PROPOSE Along Duwamish River construct a new storm sewer outfall, modify a storm sewer outfall, construct a mini -park and approx. 106 car 5) ANTICIPATEED PERIODIOFeCUONNS�n CTION South. April 1986 To December 1986 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED.IN PHASES? OYES iD NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET NA B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: C) SITE UTILIZATION: TOTAL # FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING TTALLS: - STANDARD s zE. - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE GROSS NA INCLUDES: NA INCLUDES: NA EASEMENTS NA • EXISTING PROPOSED NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA D NA D NA D NA NA NA NA NA NA El BASEMENT El MEZZANINE El BASEMENT El MEZZANINE NOTES FOSTER GOLF COURSE FOSTER GOLF COURSE 8) 1S THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S M.AP? YES ❑ NO ENVIRONMENTAL BASE 1SECTION I11: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT • CITY OF1KWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM y • 1) GENERAL LOCATION CF PROPOSED PROJECT: At 200' and 300' upstream from Foster Bridge (56th Avenue) on left bank of Duwamish River. WITHIN N.W. (1/4 SEC.) OF SECTION 14 OF TOWNSHIP N., RANGE 4 M.M., IN TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 23 2) NAME OF, WATER AREA AND /OR WETLANDS WITHIN WHICH DEVELOPMENT 1S PROPOSED: Duwamish River Shoreline 3) CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: Golf Course Open Space 4) PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Parking lot along Interurban Avenue South for 106 cars, modify existing storm sewer outfall at 56th Avenue South, mini -park at 56th Ave. S. and new storm sewer outfall Northwest. of 56th Avenue South. 5) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST AND FAIR MARIE VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDING ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS CONTEMPLATED BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION: $30.000.00 6) CONSTRUCTION DATES (MONTH AND YEAR) FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT 1S REQUESTED: BEGIN April 1986 COMPLETE December 1986 TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE: Unimproved riverbank in the out-of- bounds area of the Foster Golf Course. APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT WILL HAVE A VIEW OBSTRUCTED BY ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. NONE