The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-31-87 - THE CASTILLO COMPANY - STATE FARM INSURANCE BUILDINGSTATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY OFFICE BUILDING & PARKING SPACES INTERURBAN AVE. S0. & SOUTHCENTER BLVD. EPIC -31 -87 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON A.PR 1.5 1988 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PL `. -_ I N `' Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 April 13, 1988 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila Planning 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: We received the determination of nonsignificance for the con- struction of an office building by the Castillo Company. Al- though there is no comment period on the DNS, we have the following comments for your consideration. 1. As noted in the checklist, a shoreline substantial devel- opment permit is required since the site is bounded by the Green River. The project must be consistent with the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program, with particular attention given to the 40 foot river management zone. 2. The checklist indicates a permanent storm drainage system and pollution control devices will be installed to control and clean runoff before it enters the Green River. How will these facilities be maintained in future years? Would the city assume maintenance responsibility? If not, there should be a bond posted by the applicant /developer to ensure that future maintenance will be done at specified intervals. 3. If permits or approvals are required from other agencies, this DNS should have had a 15 -day comment period as required by WAC 197 -11- 340(2). If you have any questions, please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459 -6789. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section cc: Linda Rankin WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal • • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CONSTRUCT A TWO - STORY, 18,401 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUIUDING WITH 146(.PARKING SPACES ON A 4.14 AREA SITE. Proponent THE CASTILLO COMPANY Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERURBAN AVENUE/ SOUTH /SOUTHCENTERA LVDr.INTERSECTION IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TWN 23, RANGE 4; TUKWILA, WA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -31 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. E[ There is no comment period for this DNS 0 This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Plate Director 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevar .You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor February 19, 1988 Mr. Mounir Touma. P.E. Touma Engineers 201 Southwest 41st Street Renton. Washington - 98055 1)0(-1 RE: State Farm Building in Tukwila. Washington Preliminary Site Plan review - review of hydraulic analysis Dear Mr. Touma: Per our discussion on February 19. 1988 and your hydrology calculations submittal of February 19. 1988 (attached) the following conclusions have been reached: A. No surcharging of the downstream storm system which discharges into the Green River will occur from above development with the proposed widening of the River cross section for the 100 year river event (12,000 cfs) and either a 10 or 25 year local storm event. This calculation includes all properties served by this storm drainage system in a developed state. Therefore, no detention is required as a result of your development. B. Per the attached January 12. 1987 Planning Department Report by Vernon Umetsu, you stated no problem exists in meeting the requirements of this report. C. Per your meeting with King County Surface Water Management staff, the proposed widening of the Green River adjacent to your development with a 15 foot wide bench between the 9.000 cfs and 12,000 cfs elevations would increase the flow capacity of the Green by approximately 250 cfs; anticipated flows from this development for a 100 year storm event is calculated at 7.74 cfs. Therefore. this river widening will allow the development to occur as an appropriate mitigation of impacts to its contribution to the river flow. • • Mr. Mounir Touma February 19. 1988 page 2 Per the above conclusions. your analysis of the criteria by which the storm and flooding criteria is appropriate and you may proceed into the final site plan preparations. Included in final plan reviews will be criteria previously passed off to you under the FCZP process. If you have any question or I can be of further assistance do not hesitate to call me at 433 -0179. Sincere raser Senior Engineer Enclosures (2) xc..U0OnAnUOmVbsullk Duane Griffin Becky Davis /Permit File Citt of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 January 12, 1987 David Parker The Castillo Company P.O. Box 21087 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 RE: State Farm Building in Tukwila, Washington. BEeta JAN 181928 CASTILLO Dear Mr. Parker, Attached are our notes of the Development Review Committee meeting of January 7, 1988 at which we discussed your project. In general, building design was the only issue which required significant project modification. My own specific notes are shown below and are supplemental to the attached DRC notes. 1. Building sprinklers are required. 2. A fire hydrant must be located with n 300 ft. •f all exterior portions o 3. Modif •, ., duck accesl_--(-accstti Fire Depth.. ig, 4. The (relocated) trail must curve into the existing City right of way at the eastern and western end of the property; at the 12,000 cfs flood elevation. Be sure that this leathering in of the trail conforms with river bank `t nod'fications. • uoI`' 5::L .! letrail should be built with 10 -12 foot wide asphalt and 2 fao:t` gravel shoulders on each side. Design to be approved by Don Williams, Parks Director and Ross Earnst, City Engineer (for dike maintenance aspects). ui (-6. Dedication of the 20 ft. trail area to the City is acceptable. v77. Methane construction standards apply (see Duane Griffin, Building Official). The western access drive must line up with the (Radovich) office building across Southcenter Blvd. 9. The eastern access is acceptable with its 30 ft. curb to curb width, but must be built to City road standards (i.e. as an extension of Southcenter Blvd.) with the apron at the eastern bend. See Ross Earnst, City Engineer for construction standar s. c item No. 3. 10. Storm runoff detention facilities and river floodway mitigation facilities must be approved by Public Works. Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer has not yet received calculations from Tom Tourr 11. There is a question of why the grass swales need to be so deep if, as was stated, they are not for storm detention. Unless otherwise required, swales should be very shallow with a slope adequate to carry water to the storm system. It is recommended that the Swale syst collect paking r area runoff -from the area's perimeter iem n order to reduce erosion and overloading the swale in two spots (thus losing the filtering action). - by' 12. A 12 ft. bank maintenance road of compacted gravel is needed at the 9,000 cfs flood elevation per City standards (see Ross Earnst). Also, see Item No. 5. 0L -13. Six ft. sidewalks are required along Southcenter Blvd. This should match the sidewalk design across Southcenter Blvd., and have a minimum 4 ft. landscape strip. 14. Street trees should match those across the street. ✓15. Cutting down of landscape island to east of evaluation area will not increase the turning radius for exiting vehicles, therefore reduction should be minimized. 16. The Planning staff do not feel that the proposed building design has sufficient off -set, overhangs, and other ,signfificant architectural elements to satisfy Board of Architectural Review criteria. In the absence of very gnificant design improvements, the Department will commend denial of the proposed building to the BAR. . A"review of the project site and surrounding developments leads the Planning staff to conclude that a two story building would much more easily satisfy BAR criteria for compatible site and building design. Such a building could have a flat roof as you desire. Architectural modulation, off -sets, and compatibility with surrounding developments would be essential elements of building design. • •w` A one story building could satisfy BAR design criteria with significant design modifications. Architectural design changes to the proposed one story building could include a sloping, off -set roof, significant modulation such as off - setting the building in two areas, modifying the exterior facade for better compatibility with the office building across the street, and other various options as discussed at the meeting. ,/18. All screening must be minimum of 8 ft. high; not 6 ft. ,/19. Additional landscape screening of the trash collection area will be provided. )0. The area light poles should be reduced in sized from 30 ft. to approximately 20 ft. Additional light poles are permissible. ,/21. A luminaire plan will be required to demonstrate no off -site light spill over. 32. Additional landscaping to break up the large paved parking area will be necessary. ,/23. One truck loading space is required. /24. Automatic irrigation is required. 25. A minimum 40 ft. wide acces • -„ -, . ._ 1 -. - to the new eastern rivArbankjorcel needs to be provided for prior to any subd'lyis3�n ''1 Please feel free to contact me at 206 - 433 -1858 if you have any questions. Sincere y, ernon Umetsu, Assoc. P anner ta • 1 1 pe c i - 7-8 I Otrrt 'ct �8.�� v, Glut �Aauk, ua - Cn, ir, Tam .&.l�iu , ,Dare wit-tic x 11 , c6 £3 'va4 , 424 .6 , VeKf7 P ¢U2 � PPo.S �CM-LL,Q . aoatabcan.t aker jzfArc2 6)1 L/e'f7 cJ ` - 200,47Z. W /CL' 4 C9 oud/ ZZ �. ✓2 ..)&4961,(&&& �y1- �i✓�� . /111-7/1. 0. 67 ttia'Cu . -611 O6 PeLy G , CYcCncu !/ t'' € -a (d1,4 , 6o4J/I.W„ez.a.. F -& 1' p'i CLALE- 30)417/4 d eZ 6:tdie omit Oekt_.t; 4 '-erk&feeife--el ra.e&.' -7u-sitl, 9� din 2..c J24.am:•' C.'-1. - J C l,M.11 cwiQ Dcui -e - 6 a- C Fa-,L0.1._ .tvQ.L- 5 -7Lodeeticce,t -. 0072 - cote-L/4 -/14 C J 671, -a-J"C 41- -1'Cc,' G iaA 7/( LLA, / g, o-0-o out C- Fev & U . '- otiA) L,2_ _it a j-laid cao2JA 9-e . 0721,4 e GYl CQi in .,e 0.4A- .4/1e-to (PI 'c'ciJtc �,c- p4 -ed �� boa/ C r �e WW W1 't of - fr e 6716-±11 e. / f7(, Cial C14 . a cccs3 -Ct U`� -w Cm.e cA.40 d4,v- e.ca-, 0 Cv -5 Ott ic.- CUI- ef_4,4i- ce.2r�, /no G�i CL .4eez Ci c ,cx�( c(A/ trte t4.;ciy ta .;) • • inoc cca--107-(4 * a± azeg-d, a..1& -/-0./i/7 rad./ CIA5t2tifez-7-uora- &r • 772 pf 4.E..cert... a/Li(j 4 t,'• 0.1- ct.tcuila ctraif-) CWI..W t()c t'40 1 a clae, 6- e.,61 1-11 7'0 ra;;;a4,44 (E.1-b.1 :4.e_z,6i.i • 6-1 - ..Jec2/42.e — ne CI-Ma 9-e t-t-e<ji 1,t,/ hoh1 ce-P SI/ 12) le-ei 04- 1 ac.. - clzeLeeiy-feri(--cz 61-.)A61 '77 - QActv-a,LkEd ort, p tr2,,Y - 1ueu eon 6-t-eoC v- au.e.44; L41 t( C4 /th&L- VY 0(em LM 6(._ 32e -(t / g 0(41/nCL-4(i6 - P05,5 cle-ee.) 7! -'te a )10 442A O)1C& QC/16i/ ei<241 & Ci 61-eLW 1/44,41 T/LOL /00 C&7 Q Cato: ec f e um) Co/elk/Lea (,c) eu,4,7 I4 a cb;,(,- awt-o c 2 Ece) ,rioLp 6rY. 01 D71./ -6z9-77 , _/ ere" aeoct/ T105 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATI �� ii, Project : STAT ANCE - TUKWILA County : KING State: WA Subtitle: DETERMINE 100-YEAR, 7-DAY STORAGE Subarea : 4.2 COVER DESCRIPTION FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.) Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) Fair condition; grass cover 50% to 75% Impervious Areas Paved parking loLs, roofs, driveways Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) SUBAREA: 4.2 VERSION 1.11 User: TOM Date: 11•-25-87 Checked: Date: Hydrologic Soil Group B C D Acres (CN) 2.4(69> 1.8(98) 4.2 ==== _ TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 4.2 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NOMIIER:81* * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC. method 0�p��0��N�'0�� N~N�� FEB 1 7 19 TUKWILA PUBUC WORKS ,, • TR-55 Tc Tt THRU SUBAREA COMPUTA N Project : STATE FARK INSURANCE - TUKWILA County : KING State: WA Subtitle: DETERMINE 100-YEAR, 7-DAY STORAGE Flow Type ~ ''Length (ft) Shallow Concent'd 480 Shallow Concent'd 260 Slope Surface (ft/ft) code ' . 005 . 010 --- Sheet Flow Surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface B Fallow (No Res.) C `ultivated < 20 % D Cultivated > 20 % E Grass-Range, Short U p User: TOM Checked: F Grass, Dense G Grass, Burmuda Res. H Woods, Light Res. I Woods, Dense * - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method VERSI 'N 1.'11 Date: 11-25-87 Date: ________ n Area Wp Velocity Time (sq/fty- (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) 0.117 0.076 Time of Concentration = 0.15* --- Shallow Concentrated --- Surface Codes P Paved U Unpaved RECEIVED N�N��N�� FEB �� .^ PUBLIC WORKS ~�= ^ / ww"" TUKWILA ,, "" TR GRAPHICAL DISCHARGE METH -- Project : STATE FARM INSURANCE - TUKWILA County : KING State: WA Subtitle: DETERMINE 0-YEAR, 7-DAY STORAGE Data: Drainage Area : 4.2 * Acres Runoff Curge'Number : 81 * Time of Coentration: 0.15 * Hours Rainfall Type : IA Pond and Swamp Area : NONE _______________ Storm Number 1 2 Frequency (yrs) 10 100 24-Hr Rainfall (in) 2.8 9.8 Ia/P Ratio 0.17 0.05 Used 0.17 0.10 Runoff (in) 1.16 7.46 | | Unit Peak Discharge 0.215 |0.247 (cfs/acre/in) | | • Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 0.0% Ponds Used Peak Discharge (cfs) 1\ 8 _____________________________________ User: TOM Checked: * - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines w VERSION 1.11 Date: 11-25-87 Date: ________ �� N�� N�Q��0��-n FEB 1 7 ^~% ~KW/,_ PUBUC TR-55 ST WE VOLUME FOR DETENTION B NS • VERS 'N '1~11 Project : STATE FARM INSURANCE - TUKWILA County : KING State: WA Subtitle: DETERMINE 100-YEAR, 7-DAY STORAGE Drainage Area 4.2 Acres Rainfall Frequency: 100 years Rainfall-TypeK'IA Runoff: 7.5 inches Peak Inflow: • 7.74442 cfs Peak Outflow: 2.58 cfs Detention Basin Storage Volume: 1.97 inches or 0.7 acre feet User: TOM Date: 11-25-87 Checked: Date: 3 ag~ z ' -- �l Q ~ i/�/ c/47ID/ � �� ,, /�c (/ �«��y3 � /�r��^ RECEIVED �� ^ ^ FEB �� '�~ ww TUKWILA PUBUC WORKS ,, "" • �� SEWER �� SEWER PIPES Enter up to 10 pipes. Enter <Return> only for flowrate and diameter to end. • _ FLOWRATE DIAMETER FRICTION SLOPE VELOCITY (CFS) ( IN��, (FT^1 /6) (%) (FPS) 21.46 20.23 16.78 14.11 30.00 24.00 24.00 27.00 <Shift> <Prt Sc> print DIAMETER (IN) LENGTH (FT) 0.0230 0.0130 0.0130 0.0230 0.86 0.80 0.55 0.65 4.37 6.44 5.34 3.55 <Return> repeat •<Space Bar> back to menu FRICTION COEFF (FT^1/6) ENT+EXIT COEFF INLET CONTROL COEFF INV ELEV OUT (FT) INV ELEV IN (FT) TAILWATER ELEV (FT) ELEV INCREMENT (FT) ? 27 ? 42 ? .023 ? 0 ? .61 ? 10.15 ? 11.22 ? 13.47 ? 1 <Shift> <Prt Sc> print � CULVERTS :•„ ° RESULTS HEADWATER (FT) FLOWRATE (CFS) 13.47 IC 0.00 14.47 IC 19.46 15.47 IC 27.53 16.47 IC 33.71 17.47 IC 38.93 18.47 IC 43.52 19.47 IC 47.68 20.47 IC 51.50 21.47 IC 55.05 22.47 IC 58.39 23.47 IC 61.55 24.47 IC 64.55 25.47 IC 67.42 26.47 IC 70.18 27.47 IC 72.83 28.47 IC 75.38 <Return> repeat <Space Bar> back to menu ��N��N��N�� N�h�� FEB �� `�� ^^ wn�� TUKWILA PUBUC WORKS DISCUSSIONS ��N�� N~��.' -- `'wm TUKWILA PUBUC WORKS It was determined that storage requirement for the proposed property.may be stored in the River by increasing the cross- section area of the River along the proposed property. This method of storage was analyzed by King County Surface Water Management for the subject property and adjacent properties abutting the Green River. ,, • In discussing the above method of storage with AndyLeVeque, of King County .Surface Water Management •this was suggested by Mr Phil Frazer ), it was ascertained that; 12,000 cfs flow is at elevation 22.30o(MSL) 9,000 cfs flow is at elevation 18.70 (MSL) .'• Average River velocity is approximately 5.0 fps The widening of the River by 15 feet between the 9000 cfs and 12000cfs elevations ( equal to 3.6 feet) would increase flow capacity o+ the River by 270 CFS. • Anticipated flows at .a 100-year storm from the subject property: was calculated at 7.74 cfs which is negligible~ The following calculation is performed in order to determine the capacity of the existing storm system in Southcenter Blvd and the outfall facilities along the Green River. Tributary area: Parcel 1 = 1.04 Acres Parcel 2 = 4.52 Parcel 3 = 7.33 Radovich Site = 1.72 " Southcenter Blvd= .89 Total = 15.50 Acres Existing Culverts from the Southcenter Blvd cul-de-sac to the Outfall pipe; 1 42 of 30-inch CMP steel pipe @ s=0.857 % 2 of 24-inch concrete pipe @ s=0.80 % 3 of 24-inch concrete pipe @ s=0.55 % 1 of 27-inch CMP steel pipe @ s=0.65 % Refer td416EWERIPIPES table for capacity of above pipes. Refer to PIPE SIZING FORM for anticipated flows from the entire tributary area based on 100-year storm. You will note that the capacity of the 42 LF-27" CMP pipe is 14.11 cfs which is less than the anticipated developed 100-year flow of 19.98 cfs. Refer to CULVERT TABLE you will note that a Headwater. of slightly over 1.0 foot will result in accepting the 19.98 CFS flows. • The col 1t'tC,} t,. Ai:.' Ls. e'::,.:„'',I°1s .,.34:•:*.::. ,._. .»;3'a ?.= `..:•:tin ° 2p g G•.?1p21t= ;.t ;J ' ^.:. ;r -mss o'f i:O 25 and 1f.0 : `r' z' storms 21.14 '..t iti . ".(} % %} 1.'Fy74 !..,,.:.. in .,.._ 0f5 0.70 €ti. _ ) 1 .06 Cam{ R P +';y • 21.1,1 '!. :.. "M} ! = 0.'70 9 . ' ,�. ,. _. ' 10,79 21. •._ .. :. OC.,.69 0.90 9. 1( 1 ..» 5 16.96 21.30 00.39 (.N,. 9i_' 9.10 1.04 c:a. i .. , _.:..' 0(..:-.8',.' 0.90 9.10 1 . -...B 1 1 . n.�.$ 24" ' 24" 21,46 .t c "•,2',.•. tl y c ';? .91 2.76 (...., 70 1 Y 1.60 C, . . r3 0--- 3 " " 21.92 - w... . .( »y . 70 '1.0'7 - 1.09 .F 1 . 25 Y/'' '. .,30 ". 21.92 2.7.f..) :::) 0, :: 1 .f...1.2: 1..26 ..'.... w 39 ..o» it 11 14.11 11 100— 10 .tea. J 1 0 o 1:0 You note that the 'anticipated fiows o-'r 10 and 25 year- storms will go through the existing pipes without any problem. Existing pipes are large enough to handle the 10 arrd 25 year - storms. For the 100 the year storm, we notice •a headwater behind the the last .pipe.. equal to . ppro:imately. 1 + feet. alg TOUMA ENGINEERS 1 Southwest 41st Street • Renton. W8snington 98055 • 12081251 -9000 PROJECT 574-"re -Ml.t I SEiroce of JOB NO. I -D-F CURVE SEyt7!'LE, SHEET OF DES. DATE LOCATION► INITIAL Tc (min) Tc (min) A (Aires) C fCA - (Acres,) ' i (infhr) p (cis) PIPE DATA Of Vf (fPs) V (fps) PIPE FLOW TIME — Win) • REMARKS L (f� o S /o) ti (inJ (cf� 2(•i4,Yri BS Y:g0 9.48 /.GC IS, 74 , S6 3p,. 2(.4, 4-37 •(Ce *Par<<I2'2 i _. <MP Pt P.- 21 30 ;89 D JD. 2.8 1.65 I �tg b 3a ' & 24-" 20.23 6 . qv . o g 12oad d„" • > . _ 17,2. . 55 2 4' 1(c:la S -3'4 . _5� C e. -Pt . 2102 21 to . D 12.45 1.6:D (9, 98 42. 6s 21' 14. 11 3 . SS gar IY C-M h -.c '7CEIVED FEB 17 1988 • — UKWILA . ' UC WORKS fttar •. K e re e+ RECEIVED FEB 17 1988 TUKWILA oUBUC WORKS 1: THE CASTI LLO COMPANY Full 824.1•00 r.Mw � - SOUTH SEATTLE. WA. ..a a Intl war•, ON. m824.1•00 SCR•ICC CCMId STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOYOB ILE INSURANCE COMPANY •I•i Is RA* a•.r•s.r.•r• ww• Its• ••• • w• •• F'...N. ....."'. / d • dry, ft.fterift •__........._� ft raft! EXTROOED COM DETAIL • CROSS SECTION • . • •1 -�::r • / 1 CROSS SECTION I - • • THE CASTILLO COMPANY Null IA •a inc. • IlrO.. MMus 41411 114. pltial max cones CROSS SECTION C - C IIECEIVED FEB 1 7 1988 TUKWILA 'UBLIC WORKS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OM Awn rrw RAM S.7 CTO1 .ILL•US 17714 SEAERIL MOTES • 1• ie 4I. nPl w la�O4ft OI VJ[n Ons s•• Ir a1 0103113•3410•. L 114431+ All OlO1P P•MO r••..X. It Pu■ 113o0.a41lti44w•31 Inw•ml Uftftlft •• Ole 1 w•l MKS. IOnr_ • L OM• 44 wL 134444•1141 I••13131••01413 4eI0i101 ••e•. I. ft NM Oft; Swift OK 10_ If •••• • 143O33331• • NOM r • 444•44 111 • 4 4IM O Oat I alma= • I• Maw al MAIM SO O UP 140. 4. ••34 r MI ••1 • as w. S. HY •Y PII • !MM. ammo ■ 11In O on t• mar • 0 ••n A o lir am. L c.14. Pa n o ••• . -P! - L al 44•31 •V IMAM Waft SIB 0146.w0 •••• P MIMS P MO ll =ON MOM KM! NO Nona w 44+344. M. `�� 1 r IR O GOO O w 441••1• IL 4 r INNS •m• MO= •I If -'4444 Piaft . re 34.4 • _.. c-z '.i : ft. ft January 5, 1988 Vernon Umetsu Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: 87 -9 -SMP Dear Mr. Umetsu: We have received notification of the State Farm Insurance development on Southcenter Boulevard. We own property on the northwest side of Southcenter Boulevard within the same Green River peninsula. We would appreciate being kept informed as to the status of the project and the decisions made regarding development. Cordially, Katie Greif Development Manager GRadoviCll J°11111 Development Company 2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454 -6060 CITY OF TUKWILA 0 CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 31 -87 TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE 12/30/87 DRC MEETING. FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: VERNON UMETSUi TO: (l BLDG Q PLNG r] P.W. [ FIRE [l POLICE 0 P & R PROJECT STATE FARM SERVICE CENTER SITE LOCATION Southcenter Blvd. at Ft. Dent Park entrance. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 12/21/87 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 12/30/87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT A F 1, i /YL2fA,liT /5 /et PE' c, r; 6e- `a / /s /hviz. &/A/G- pd1 v IT ,Qe r /'i' /1✓ / L E /-71A "...AA DATE i' Z--LZ— COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 31 -87 TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE 12/30/87 DRC MEETING. FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: VERNON UMETSU / TO: r BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. /FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT STATE FARM SERVICE CENTER SITE LOCATION Southcenter Blvd. at Ft. Dent Park entrance. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 12/21/87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 12/30/87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT. ,! A F /712,0/2A/1-7 /5 fie G'vi 12(,:---D /°f c 7W /5 /TU /L /J /N6- f U ST !YE Y °/Q /N //L �,Cl 7/ 9 �i�✓�F/ V DATE /-z- - COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 '`' CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE 12/30/87 DRC MEETING. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: VERNON UMETSU TO: PROJECT • CN EPIC 31 -87 FILE BLDG 0 PLNG Q P.W. [j FIRE 0 POLICE [] P & R STATE FARM SERVICE CENTER SITE LOCATION Southcenter Blvd. at Ft. Dent Park entrance. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 12/21/87 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 12/30/87 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT OF4, T/7765-,44 k/e6- /Gok l,'k 1 A7ed 0-45-?yuc11&1 54-02,14 Q n ' G I S 21 % f'(41 1 1 P.2ec_f 41 )o ' t (6) ' M i k00 d -P Ai) /(0.„11"1/), (--Anwsed 44/5 (174-- r VII -1 n P I% ►01,(5` / DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CIrol No. Epic File No. !I- 87 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 870A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: STATE FARM SERVICE CENTER SITE 2. Name of applicant: THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. 3. .Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: DAVID PARKER THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. 2345 E. University Dr. Phoenix,Az. (602)231 -9000 4. Date checklist prepared: November 22, 1987 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NO 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SHORELINE, CUND1I [UNAC USE, BAR, FLUUU LUNIROL, Id- LIT-Mb , ERMtT FROM IHt CITY U1- IUKAILA 1 ARIMFNI- OF- FCAI ary AI0 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERY 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no-. need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. S(VI 4�D jc" Cs Q�Ar'° 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for aperson to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The proposed site is bordPrP I nn the west_ by a fully de�— Southccntcr Blvd, on the southwest by Interurban Avenue, an o t e so t and east by the Green River. .__AIPRoxs cY /OO FT, 671S 7" DP 77(6r 715XUA{LIa. AV6; So. /So u -rev ccivr& . 2? Vb. 1N7-EI2.S6-Cr' or/ /n/ Tr/ v lVw SE c. Z TWAI. 23. R. c (/ -1.e.1 . -i _y_.1a1.141- - 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO . - .. +'two..' - TO' BE COMPLETED BY APPL•NT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, of er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? See Attachment. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Stiff hard moist, gray to brown silt to sandy silt refer to Soil Report prepared by Applied Geotechnoligy Inc.. dated October 9, 1987. d.. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. See Attachment. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. See Attachment. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 29% Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally • describe and give approximate quantities if known. la-PA off-site sources of `?EiSSloa odor.r,re .'rls,n v?.)i A;c. s., , -;"' F ri.,Al'(-1 on ) n i:'?r ur ' n [.vo. CO CriC SPP Attachment_ b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Main off -Site sniirces of Pmisti .nr nrinr arP _frnm'VPhd-Caec .travellincg nn Tnterurha Avenii adjacent to the Site c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Site is bounded on the South & EasT by the Green Kiver. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. YES See Attachment. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredging is anticipated. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. See Attachment. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. YES See Attachment. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only FC.00D Go,(rR°(. 5T(.QcYVREi //mPlt.over- l-ferCrs certertAccy fir cc.gfTA-gCer. F I' /A C. APP2ovAL or 'PeS'GAis To ae 44 A cao,R_¢'D CRDrt c c -rY oV G. /A/ec -rit, P OR- TO OCDG P�A-41T ssciA- Acccr, b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. bee Attachment. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such . systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. bee Attachment. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into . other waters? If so, describe. The introduction of imQrevious surfaces over 30% of the bite with increase the storm runott. phis runott will T collected in a developer installed storm drainage system in accordance with City of iuKwi a requirements, and exiting into the ureenn River. F (o_ p,ureA r GJ (L C. $ U S 7 o CGEIa 'nl Pke -c i n(G C.o7 Ro,OFp FrcTne(nrG CITY S7o2M sysrEM, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only F, N/A C. G2h.r,e's Sur 3 c--r 70 C I T Y cl,t c. /N esr7L. �PPR.ov�c. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Refer to br 1 _ R h 2 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: e Attachment. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: r, cedar, pine, other ✓ shrubs ✓grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed . or altered? • SPP Attachment, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered 3'p UFO are known to extS17-071V7Site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Effort will be made to retain all large trees and incorporate into proposed landscaping of the development. 5c. L/kNDSC4-PGA PcPril, 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,(ero), eagle mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass salmon trou herring, shellfish, other: /-AL 2, U. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare, threatened or endangered animals species are known to inhabit the Site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. PART of PAcrr =(c . co4s— F-6)4,)AY d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: _ See Attachment. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturin , The main source of energy is electricity which wil be LET in y GT—energy .such as oil and available to he Site. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energycanserving materials will be encouraged in the buiiding construction. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this 'proposal? If so, describe. NO. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N /A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main source of noise in the area is the vehi cTe i;raTf c from Niue which is on the Southwest border of the Site, and locaT- frattic on the south— Center Blvd. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. See Attachment. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Do not anticipate to reach noise levels above what is permissible. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent. properties? The project Site is presently undeveloped zoned 2 44 ). b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO. c. Describe any structures on the site. No structure existson Site. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what ?. Ti e. What is the current zoning classification of the • site? C -2. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? C -2. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 98 j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: �11g� 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The City of Tukwila Comprehensive l an designates the area for rnmmerrial use (C -2). A Sim devalopmant plans are suhmitted to the City fnr_reylew and to ensure cnmpatihility of existing 7nne_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N /A. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? • Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N /A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N /A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structure is proposed for this Site may exceed the maximum height of the C -2 Zone, WRITIT 35 feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts; if any: The prop °,sed development will place an attractive building with appropriate landscaping treatment. 11. Light and Glare Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glaze that is produced from the Site is from 'ui sing ig ting an exterior ig ing. ere is also light produced-from vehicles using the Site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Outdoor lighting will -6e screened from 150Tic right -of -ways and surrounding areas. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity ?Ft Dent Park is located north of the Site on the other side of the Green River which abuttS the Site. Foster Golf Course is within half a mile from the Site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing . recreational uses? If so, describe. NO. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:The developer is in agreement to dedicate land tor the trail wa system adjacent tie Green Riven or greater use by f} e communif -14- • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N /A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the Site is from Southcenter Rlvd_ which is a cul- de-sac east of Interurban Avenue. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop ?Metre provides public transportation along Interurban Ave. some 300 feet west of the Site c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate ?132 parking will be provided to serve the appsed development_The Site is underdevel.anpertx and there will he no parking spaces illuminated. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated P —1-,7;C (7.7 T�rPS/ by the completed project? If known indicate when I, 00.9 GsP peak volumes would occur. The proposal' will result ad: o� _ 3�S TKrPS(A� approximately 190 (ADT) vehicular trip er day based upon I7,7,c16,4 15,8uu sq.ft. of gross area. Peak Hour volumes will be - eM, Paa_ -op AD sma-T; approximately iu% of Aul 1,82 x(8, -or = 52 TR/PS g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: The use of public transportation and carpool programs would minimize potential trattic. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. See Attachment. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. See Attachment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: , natural gas, at ,defuse servig sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. See Attachment. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its ec.ision. Signature: Cg) Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APP•ANT • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? See Attachment. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? N /A. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: N /A. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? N /A. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N /A. -23- • • ATTACHMENT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth b. The Site slopes gently from west to east, with steepest slope of 6% . e. The basic topographic features will not be altered by the proposed project, some site grading will be required to construct the proposed building, parking areas and • utilities. The maximum cut will be 4' and maximum fill will be 2'. Cuts and fills will be balanced. If any excess material is available, it will be used on -site for landscaping features. f. There will be a temporary water erosion resulting from clearing and grading of the Site. The erosion potential will be mitigated by proper construction of temporary erosion /sedimentation control facilities. 2. Air a. Air emission will occur during the construction phase and as a result of the completed development. The ambient air quality will be impacted by the temporary increase of construction equipment exhaust, emission of dust, gas and smoke. The change in air quality will be minor and will be similar to that of similar types of development. 3. Water a. Surface: 2. The Site is adjacent to the Green River. The work proposed for the site is limited to area above top of bank The bank of the River adjacent to the Site may be graded to provided detention of storm runoff resulting from its development. 4. No the storm runoff from the Site drains into the Green River. The proposed development would direct most runoffs through catch basins and pipes to be discharged into the Green River. 5. Yes. The 100 year flood elevation of the Green River at the Site is 22.3 L.F.(MSL). Flood Control Permit and associated documentation will be submitted to the City and all proposed work will be performed in accordance with City of Tukwila's requirements. 1/4 • • b. Ground 1. Relatively permeable soil over much of the Site result in a fairly high rate of absorption of rainfall. The absorption rate will decrease with introduction of impervious surfaces ( roofs, parking and driveways ). The addition of impervious surfaces will increase the storm run -off which will reach the River more rapidly. 2. As is common with urban development, surface water quality will be reduced as pollutants (oil, grease, and lawn fertilizer) enter surface and ground water after development. The quality of ground water will be reduced as the impervious surfaces increase. Introduction of oil/ separator at all discharge points on the Site will reduce pollutants entering the River. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any. The developer will comply with the City requirements which requires that storm water runoff do not exceed the peak rate of runoff of a ten -year storm prior to development. Temporary erosion /sedimentation control facilities will be employed during construction to intercept potential silt laden run -off prior to discharging into the Green River. These facilities will remain in effect until permanent storm drainage system and pollution control devices are installed. 4. Plants b. The Site is covered by a wide variety of weeds, grasses shrubs and trees. The development will remove weeds, grass and shrubs in the area where the proposed building and parking areas will be constructed. Most of trees will remain on the Site. 5. Animals d. The Site supports a variety of Small wildlife species indigenous of undeveloped areas. Many of them will be displaced by wildlife more commonly found around similar developments. Construction precaution will be implemented as necessary to avoid impact to the aquatic habitat of the Green River. 2/4 • • 7. Environmental Health b. Noise 2. Long term - there will be an increase in noise levels resulting from additional vehicle traffic (190 -200 ADT) generated by the project. No unusual noise sources are anticipated. Short term - There will be temporary increase in noise levels as a result of construction activities. 15. Public Services a &b. New building with fire resistant construction will be substantially less of a hazard than the existing vegetation. The impact of the project on fire protection services is expected to be slight. The number of people that would be using the proposed building will create slight demand for police services. However, the type of activities related to this development are not conducive to unlawful acts. The increase in traffic will slightly increase the demand upon police traffic control staff. 16. Utilities b. Puget Sound Power and Light supplies the area's electrical needs. Power lines to the surrounding area exist. New services will probably be required to be underground. Sanitary sewer system & domestic water supplies are present in Southcenter Blvd. Pacific Northwest Bell (PNB) will provide telephone services into the area. E. Supplement Sheet 1. The objective of the proponent, The Castillo Company, who represents State Farm Insurance, is to develop 4.2 Acres of Parcel #3 of Tukwila Short Plat No. TU -SP 79 -7 -SS for the construction of one -story office building including a customer's evaluation area. 3/4 • • E. Supplement Sheet (continue) The proposed building is approximately 15,800 Sq.Ft. of gross area with approximate parking and landscaping in accordance with the City of Tukwila ordinances and regulations. The close proximate of the Site to the Green River, the proponent will submit application for the Shoreline Permits, Board of Architectural Review, and Flow Control Permits, to the City for development review, and compliance to its shoreline master plan. Upon the City review of the Site development Plans, the proponent will proceed with preparation of construction drawings for the structure and on -site improvements. The construction of these improvements is projected to commence Spring of 1988. 4/4 6.7_ I 1) pae._ -4)er-57 At 2,crrift . mugs $ om ,, ...... •••••••••• I ../.. . / 11 ------- --- 1 / s■-......_ r---/ _.4...! 1 .....,,. ..__/..,..-:„:„.... ... - . • • • ,-4 D.5M1101.0. •■1(• 5.1( .15 •. • •cns dur1.0,•G Ofr CC ••E• J. 1.520 50.r. air CE •.1t• L. 8.,130 50.3. 1••!..?•'. • 10.", 101k. - ss sa.r r. ..4 : • •5 -.PacEs •�0,D(:: :7 .14 AA. _TH F. CA 1:C; :7:_?AtlY SOUTH SEATTLE. .VA. ,E. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSuRmse —.E COMPANY 10C310V1 ;AP .1 . I ••Il SO .1. IH VTIL Si 11•If 1•0 1 •z!, SION, , • 0•71.711•3•1111 ANWW03 33NWISNI 3118OWO1fl 1fl1flW WINS 31V1S OLEO wall *VM '3111V3S Hinos ..40 W. •••••■• •••••••• fee., MI • • Innrd ANVJWOD 01111SVO 3H1 1 ••••••■ • Mem aft* re Mon. We. .1gm •••••• •• • •••• •• ••••••••• ...••• NOLLIVABla MINIM 411101XWAINIE 141110111 _ --__1111131~11111B_III1ON 1111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111•11 111111111110111111111111111111111111 1111OLLVAW1111.111111114 AL. - /' r / _�` _-~_ - T—,4744 • \ \\ \\ LAWN \ \ ` ` . ` ___-�. 07.117 11.111.1.O litiK•1C0 C171101 01100101 10011 0113 11.1011121 KOLB WO ARILICISIM IMO= CIOIL711,17K, 0/401 COMA IIPITALLII IK.C1F1C WPC= =K. iitallin =LIZ 13 111. 0.C. MUSK IVY 1101 11.117 MOIRA •100.01111. MY Mar WARM 10311.1 11C1 HSI OMUTA 11C/1100K =WY 11111101i. KOLL, AMP .1110111011.10 1.30110111.1.1.1 PLUMY YOWL 7111111•Zit 1.00 .0.0111001.11 0011111.111141* VILTOK1 MAIO MO JUMP. MCI AM. CUM /1111117 MAIL •ZOIKI .11.070• IMO WSW. 1.10 1.100101Kni• .711,1C171.11.1 •IMINC4017, PLOT MN 10... 1001111A •C//1/01.1114 COMICS MUM 1101.1.• 11•14 1100010100:0011 YOU VIRGO .I.000 . OIL C.C. 17C01 RATS 11.30 IP. 10-14 tn. THE CASTULO COMPANY Full' SOUTH SEATTLE, WA. ..0. 001 21007 11.00(111•. API /0011 0501.1 11021 11,-9000 SERvICE CENTER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE /wmnmNCc COMPANY ~ ■ c/pc. • • 2 of 3 G R VCR `!".• 4 - For to. so. • \ a- au ‘\_ THE CASTil LLO COMPANY Full SOUTH SEATTLE, WA. BO. DOW nasIo. .1, In. OW. 10071 231-0000 I SERVICE E CE NT ER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY PLOA •-0011.010701.1.1.1.013 II■1' • • •••!.... 7ffTOLIMA ENGINEERS el u.....1•■•■ •■••• • gm.. a.m... Oles" • LIIMI Is, MO • • •••••••0 • I ■ C-I of P TA_ — CROSS SECTION A - A — ,e EXTRUDED CURD DETAIL F • CROSS SECTION 8 - R THE CASTIILLO COMPANY Full P.O. 110. 210117 KnENi X. •112010 11503. 111021 201 -0000 SERVICE CENTER CROSS SECTION C - C _p STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOO.INOTON .ILLINOIS 51710 GENERAL NOTES 81.1. COISTRICTION 0011 awes TO K11 Cm TM unn OM OF 13111.1C IOW .3001111111030 MO 1311001 OF MO SIMMS IPICITIC01010. r m 3-w u n7ms nnnm m uwvun. arm A 3•10.00•1111101$111111 °` rl 1. Es▪ T.M1M 004E 1 MOanlm m MnmM MOW, MMUS v 11001101P 0 MOrr°.MS °naTil S. 11100, R1.TIMM A. M 0).3000 n10 0110007 S. 100111 m PIn 0011 M CUSS r. T O mu 004E SI urnln e aT.Nna 10 1/.n TmwMIRKmKnn7n..sT.as•3-111/. M. man CMS VAIL • ns EwnT 1•.P HIT 03311715. .. u.IRS.70105001■ KMa.lmr.44.0`1111urtu ••• MI WM OF 101101111 ID. ..M'TOmni 1.„711 1. `01 I I aI1 TO w I.M■.es 004E u 000100 TO 011700 +.I TOUMA ENGINEERS A')MATO 11•6• A�') t. Mn gy P0 90. C -2 of 2