The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-315-86 - CITY OF TUKWILA - PARK ANNEXATION (53RD AVENUE / 139TH STREET)PARK PROPERTY ANNEXATION 13919 53RD AVE. S. EPIC 315 -86 WAC 197 -11 -970 ATTACHMENT A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 6+ acre Annexation, including 3 acres School District property and 5 occupied adjacent houses Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 53rd Ave S and S 139 St (SW ,- of Section 14, Township 23, Range 4) 13919 53 Av S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 31.5 -86 GN- $1,-080 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [� There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by �I13jg� . The lead agency will not act on this prop8sall for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date 5-- 2-9 -�'!o Signature Virtta4 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare that: [I Notice of Public Hearing [I Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [I 'Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [I Planning Commission Agenda Packet [[ Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [I Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [j Shoreline Management Permit [►Determination of Nonsignificance [[ Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [l Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [I Notice of Action [r Official Notice ❑ Other [� Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on cd5t-ach.a_c0 J:ut Name of Project Fc*i PCLL�. 1�G1Vlaajlz F i l e Number C N - g6-020 gatillt.te Q. Signature , 198%. South Central School District #406 4640 South 144th Seattle, WA 98168 Water District 125 P.O. Box 68147 Seattle, WA 98168 Director, Dept. of Planning & Community Development King County 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 RE: SEPA determination Fire District #1 12026 42nd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98168 Fire District #18 4237 S. 144th Seattle, WA 98168 King County Boundary Review Board King County Courthouse Room W378 Seattle, WA 98104 SEPA Information Center King Co. Building & Land Development Div. 431 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 .CITY-OF TUKWILA CN g% -D3() CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC — 31 5 g Co FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: n BLDG Q PLNG [] P.W. (l FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT POkk, PetAMJAktrl n4., - 53 rd A-V, S 5 . 139 �`` 5t. LOCATION FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED ‘51/6)-E6 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY c",;2/-86, STAFF COORDINATOR &la C Ca_ FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT C. rt- My i -rn cUV\ S61^,IC s* rT 53 Lint r `i-t;s Tsy 1$ -1 N a, tit A 114 - - DATE 3 7 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 •CITY'OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 86 -080 EPIC - 315 --g� FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. n FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT " PCUL4 _ 53 rd A-V, S. 5 . 19 `4` 5±-. LOCATION FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 5/'c RESPONSE REQUESTED BY c-;?/-869 STAFF COORDINATOR 12.0 C C CCi- FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT • .04,1 r Q. ,o it'n4,,,€)---' I ,ir,(g .2;erZidf.,615-15- . Vetf,...- 2L' a,. . ". ' Ai N r.- 5/(• /r�' �/F akii4-44.8.. (:x:4,0, , _..4J4bi J #. Ls/ DATE 5-* COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 -CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 86 -030 EPIC 31 S —' g FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. n FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT PcL4JC Ativvt eiVarAin/u" - 5 3rd # L S. 4 5 . 139 ` 5— . LOCATION DATE TRANSMITTED 5- f C1- g(o STAFF COORDINATOR )2(2.-C Ca-- Fb FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY E-0=2/-$6, RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM. COMMENT id D Li r) k k_z EFFEc-1' OI,v FIiZ t'E -r�i' DATE tv\ ■2 c> 14 ,Es-‘. COMMENTS PREPARED BY.sC C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 8� -c30 EPIC - 31 Co FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: 0 BLDG 0 PLNG n P.W. n FIRE 1711POLICE n P R PROJECT Pa1JC. Avwu,VartA; .," - 530 Av, S. 4 5 . 139-141 5±. LOCATION DATE TRANSMITTED S / 9 - 8 FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5-.21-86 STAFF COORDINATOR KLk1t000L- FOX RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT PROPOSAL AS OUTLINED WOULD HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT UPON THIS ' DEPARTMENT. ADDITIONAL FVALUA TIME OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 1 .5/20/86 pj1 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY'OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: CN -080 EPIC- 315-'g% FILE TO: 0 BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE ri P & R PROJECT PCULIG / wvt /ara;K - 53rd /4V' S. 4 5 . 139.1415±. LOCATION DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR I2d2t C CCi-- F- FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 5-71,;;,/,'45r COMMENTS PREPARED BYa,.__ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: aiirl,( r( C0 TO: Iffl BLDG PROJECT C/ 0 LOCATION /,39/9 DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR ] PLNG r41 P.W. q/btail-ti))/a 4(11/ 3 r7fFIRE FILE POLICE' & R FILE NO. NSE REQUESTED BY 3/96/F6 SPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC T WAS RE ED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE ' PONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM C MMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: O lftJ YMCA) TO: (7[ BLDG PROJECT Otif LOCATION /,3Q /e? DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR CN Rp DAD EPIC (5 7 o FILE j PLNG 191 P.W. %AFIRE POLICE (''1 P & R bziaarn /a., 3CUi� 3 FILE NO. NSE REQUESTED BY 3/gO /F6 SPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC T WAS RE ED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE ' PONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 46-- _pa �// /%ze DATE 3 /1 /Pa COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: FILE TO: C[ BLDG] PLNG P.W. ((FIRE EirPOLICE PROJECT 0 okaar» l LOCATION i ?9i9 3 al/ 5 P &R DATE TRANSMITTED 3 FILE NO. NSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR SPONSE RECEIVED 3/a0 /Sln THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC T WAS RE 'ED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE ' PONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARErn C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 1 fy, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: NA/ E( Ox) " 1) rl i1 TO: [' ] BLDG ]_P_LNG P 1 P.W. ('' ]FIRE (POLICE (�P & R PROJECT o/ 3 b(��{) f a LOCATION /39/e? al/ DATE TRANSMITTED : STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. NSE REQUESTED BY SPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC T WAS RE ED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE ' PONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /l■ DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 1' CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: aim( tabC ) TO: It BLDG PROJECT Otif LOCATION ,/39/q DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR •CN EPIC 315-1(0 FILE . l . 13 PLNG C(° P. W7 r f FIRE I POLICE ('P & R 4kie) / a 3CLri� NSE REQUESTED BY 3/g0/ 66 SPONSE RECEIVED FILE NO. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC T WAS RE ED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE PONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. COMMENT kaktil 1.04.6adaP Yz ,o1 zI.- -t _7 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 fJ • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Con 1 No. 149-O$0 Epic File No. 315_ Fee $100.00 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Annexation of park property 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Parks & Recreation Department 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person :Don Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila Williams, 6200 4. Date checklist prepared: March 6, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): To annex the parcel of land into the city as soon as possible. It is hoped the task will be completed by May 1, 1986. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The .3 acre will be used for park purposes. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Resolution by Tukwila City Council to accept the annexation of the lot. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. It is the City's interest to annex this .3 acre_ lot and house into the city. Within the next four years this site will be used as a park. In the interim we want to be able to protect the property under city_ regulations. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, -vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Address: 13919 53nd. Ave. S. Section Township Range a 3y/4 ! a 3 �a� 4/ No topographical map is available 13. Does the proposal lie ■+ithin an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI. Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of-the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Plat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 4% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay and sands. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of f i l 1.Site may be leveled for future park use. It is unknown at this time what quanities will be involved. This potencial use has no great bearing with the annexation request. f. Could erosion occur as a result of . clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not generally, any will be controlled g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Unknown. • Evaluation for . Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:Unknown 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N.A. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None Evaluation for Agency. Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans . the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.None • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, _ 'en, x evergreen tree: fir, cedar x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None per this request. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • . d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None per this request. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ALA b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. m A_ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N.A. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N.A. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N.A. SEvaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N.A. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential area. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. One residential home and one garage. 1 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None per involved in this annexation request, however both structures may be removed in the future. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Suburban Residential (SR) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Low . density residential If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Zero j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None, the house is currently not inhabited. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N.A. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The Tukwila City Council will consider zoning this lot as R -1 -20, as is the property in the city across the street. This zoning will be compatible with current land use and will allow future park construction. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None per this annexation request. One low income house may be removed in the future. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N.A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N.A. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic, impacts, if any: N.A. • III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N.A. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N.A. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N.A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N.A. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Park Playfeild is 300 ft. to the north of this lot. Foster Golf Links is within 6 blocks_ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The annexation of this _10± into the_ci_ty to develop this Jnd into a ciif y park . • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See maps for site location. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, 4 blocks c. Now many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NIA._ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)•N.A. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N.A. f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N.A. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N.A. 15. Public Services a. Would the .project result in an increased,need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, very little increase in public services would be required by the annexation of this one lot. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None because of the low imput. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, water, refuse, telephone, sanitary sewer, cable. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N.A. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: /aj TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI T • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? N.A. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only' 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N.A. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N.A. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N.A. • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N.A. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N.A. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? The proposed annexation is not in conflict, in fact both the county and the City land Use Plans call tor this cite to be a low density residential area. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: " TO it COMPLETED BY APPL IST • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the ob'ectiv(s) of the proposal? The goal of the annexa 'cion is to add41,:c.abutri.ny pcitc:el u park land to the existing city area. By doing this the city can enforce its park codes, and develop a park using City Block Grant funds within our own city limit. The alternative of not annexing this site into the city is not good as the land cannot be developed as a city. operated park. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The R.C.W., that allows cities to annex park property into its own boundaries is the best method of annexing this particulars parcel. Other methods would be less appropriate and more timely. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The best method to annex the city owned parcel is by the proposed method, it is less time consummatory direct. No other alternative is us acceptable. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- 204.00 4 FOSTER .NfMO.4 /.IC P•/RK /397W sr. /- 41-9.44 PP. rrs. 00 4/19•S2'E 352. 00 332.00' ti L•ne �'�nv..;.:.. Lo acIJ P1.9 (4t ro.. ST .0! �, pcex &' f Jr Cy See /'/ro.. P.p e /• ::. dCo..... ,:,` a t '9-•` N89 • 229'.10 E 71.00' r 4499. 22' 00'7 es? 94 0 H Se L // P.�a tees.. ••./.,4o /e Sae /"ae-. P.fi• 20' 20' . i N M1 4:4/874#:!0 E /404010' /1/4e9'4#30 E /4200 I i� , •-• 9 • . 1 Imo' N 20' 20' ir. • TICOR TITLE INSURANCE Policy of Title Insurance SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAUFORNIA (a Stock Company), a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or 4. Unmarketability of such title. This policy shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating signatory of the Company. Countersigned: By TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By Attest Validating Signatory President Secretary TO 2464 (1-85) American Land Tine Association Owner's Policy — Form B — 1970 (amended 10- 17 -70) CAT. NO. NN01124 -` raasan Iound C aimsrK " -to bs ON.n by and without undue (a) The Company, at its own of an insured in all delay, shall provide for the def litigation consisting of actions or proceedings commenced against such insured, or a defense interposed against an inswaclin.artaction_to„enforce_a contract for a sale of the Diskette number: D130 MR and the Company shall reimburse suc lnaured for am expense so in ed. • 4. Notice of Wa — Limitation of Action In addition. to the notices ions and Stipulations, sua seta paragraph in writing ALTA - B Number : A- 344415 Date : DECEMBER 20, 1985 at 8:30 AM Amount : $55,900.00 SCHEDULE A 1. Name of insured CITY OF TUKWILA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 2. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this schedule covered by this policy is: Fee Simple Estate 4. The land referred to in this policy is located in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 127.4 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 1, COLEGROVE'S ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 85, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. A- 344415 PAGE 1