The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-317-86 - SEGALE BUSINESS PARK - BUILDING 862 (BANK)SEGALE BUSINESS PARK- BUILDING 862 OFFICE /BANK BUILDING & DRIVE -UP TELLER STATION ANDOVER PARK WEST & S. 180T" STREET EPIC 317 -86 SEGALE BUS /NESS PARK May 13, 1986 Ms. Moira Bradshaw City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Segale Business Park Project 862 18000 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA Dear Moira: MAY i 19861 CITY OF TUmty LA PLANNING DEPT. Enclosed please find the Hydrological Study for our above captioned project. Very truly yours, SEGO_ :_ INESS PARK Ann J 'ichols AJN:sb enc. P.O. BOX 88050 • TELEPHONE: (206) 575 -3200 • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 NV 8.L ti.• etlt..'O.•.r .r !., tY .d. GENERAL CONTRACTOF. P. O. BOX 88050 a 18010 SO CENTER PARKWAY • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 11/ • TELEPHONE (206) 575 -3200 223- 01- SE- GA- LM- A372NO HYDROLOGICAL STUDY FOR SEGALE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT 862 Tukwila, Washington in .King County .Washington George By € MAY i is 1986 L CITY Cl:. .,..r FUi:'v.rI.A PLANNING DEPT. 5. Crawford Frofessional Engineer 1.3945 April \c):66 D(1:1:, 1 'it GENERALCONTRACTO P. O. BOX 88050 • 18010 SO HCENTER PARKWAY • TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 9 • TELEPHONE (206) 575 -3200 223- 01- SE- GA- LM- A372NO HYDROLOGICAL STUDY FOR SEGALE BUSINESS PARK PHYSICAL DATA PROJECT 862 offsite area = 0.21 ac onsite area = 2.56 ac Total drainage area = 2.77 ac PREDEVELOPMENT COEFFICIENT Area offsite impervious = 0.00 offsite landscaped = 0.00 offsite natural = 0.21 onsite impervious = 0.00 onsite landscaped = 0.00 onsite natural . = 2.56 Coef. f . 0.55 0. 0.70 0.95 0.35 0.30 Predevelopment Coefficient Cu = 0.30 DEVELOPED COEFFICIENT Area offsite impervious = 0.00 offsite landscaped = 0.21 offsite natural = 0.00 onsite impervious = 2.19 onsite landscaped = 0.37 onsite natural = 0.00 Coef +. 0.95 0.35 0.70 0.95 0.35 0.3C Developed Coefficient Cd = 0.67' TIME OF CONCENTRATION 10 + 36C/60(2) Tc = 13.0 min GENERAL CONTRACTO 9eO BOX ouoau• 1uu1oGDuTnCswTsn PARKWAY mTum�u\vvAa*mG7Ow• TELEPHONE (2o6)a7a3omo HYDROLOGICAL REPORT FOR SEGALE BUSINESS PARK KING COUNTY RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH Q (peak) = C*I*A* 10 year Storm Frequency Basin identifier - Project 862 Discharge into - City of Tukwila 60" Storm Line Basin area = 2.77 Runoff Coeff. = 0.82 Rainfall int. = 1.4 in/hr Q = 3.18 cfs AREA A 1/2 Area Q = 1.59 Length of culvert A to City M.H. = 70 feet Slope = 3% 8" conc. culvert @ 3% = 2.3 cfs > 1.59 cfs OK 10" M.C.P. @ = 2.2 cfs > 1.59 cfs OK * Use either conc. or metal culvert pipe AREA B 1/2 Area Q = 1'59 Length of culvert B to City M.H. is 90 feet Slope = 3% 8" conc.cuivert @ 3% = 2.3 cfs > 1.59 cfs OK 10" MCP @ 3% = 2.2 cfs > 1.59 cfs OK * Use either conc. or metal culvert pipe GENERAL CONTRACT IIR. O. BOX 88050 • 18010 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 188 • TELEPHONE (206) 575 -3200 223- 01- SE- GA- LM- A372NO HYDROLOGICAL REPORT FOR SEGALE BUSINESS PARK KING COUNTY RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH 0 (peak) = C *I *A* 100 year Storm Frequency Basin identifier - Project 662 Discharge into - City Of Tukwila 60" Storm Line Basin area = 2.77 Runoff coeff. = 0.82 Rainfall int. = 2.22 in /hr 0 = 5.04 cfs AREA A 1/2 Area 0 = 2.52 Length of culvert A to City M.H. = 70 feet Slope = 3 10" conc. @ 7. = 4.2 cfs > 2.52 cfs 01 :: 10" MCP @ 3% = 2.15 c: 2.52 cfs NG 12" MCP @ 3% = 3.4 cfs :> 2.52 cfs OK 12" Conc. or metal culvert pipe is adequate AREA B 1/2 Area n 5 0 Length of culvert B to City M.H. = 90 feet Slope = 3% 10" conc. @ 3% = 4.2 cfs 12" MCP @ 3% = 3.8 cfs �. 52 cfs > 2.52 cfs OK OK 12" Conc. or metal culvert pipe will be used 48.ME111140 .. „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104 April 23, 1986 Brad Collins, Planning Director Department of Planning City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Non - Significance EPIC - 317 -86: Segale Business Park /1 Dear Mr. Collins: • EMBER APR 25 1986 CITY OF TUKWii.A PLANNING DEPT. Metro is under order by the State Department of Ecology to upgrade its Puget Sound treatment plants to a secondary level of treatment. Metro is in the process of evaluating five secondary treatment alternatives and a Metro Council plan adoption decision is scheduled by July 31, 1986. Metro has been ordered by DOE to institute a sewer connection ban for the entire Metro service area to be effective August 1, 1986, unless Metro adopts a secondary treatment plan by that date. Metro is proceeding on schedule and anticipates meeting the August 1, 1986, plan adoption deadline. If you would like additional information concerning Metro's secondary treatment planning process or would like to be placed on our mailing list to receive regular updates on the status of secondary planning, please contact Gerry Larrance, Metro Community Relations at 447 -6626. Water Quality Metro has designated the Green River as a major water of regional concern where the protection of water quality is a high priority. We recommend that adequate slope setbacks be established and maintained, and that routing of stormwater should be in such a manner to prevent erosion and limit significant increases in sediment loading to the river. Measures to protect water quality should include, but not be limited to: o Construction timing and staging; o Temporary erosion and sedimentation controls; o Permanent and /or temporary runoff control facilities (e.g. grass -lined swales, detention /retention ponds); • • Brad Collins April 23, 1986 Page Two o Provisions for maintaining adequate setbacks and riparian vegetation; o Preventing toxic materials, petrochemicals and other pollutants from entering surface waters; o Identifying runoff discharge points into surface waters through King County's drainage planning process. Public Transportation The proposed project site is served by the following transit routes: o #150 - All day service to Seattle, Southcenter, Kent and Auburn o #155 - All day service to southeast and downtown Renton o #241 - Commuter service only to /from Southcenter, Renton, Bellevue, Juanita and Kenmore Bus zones already exist in all quadrants of the Southeast 180th /Andover Park West intersection. We recommend that passenger pedestrian improvements to all stops be incorporated into the project although none of these zones are likely to be located on the project site itself. Don Winston should be contacted regarding bus zone access improvements. He can be reached at 447 -4085. We also recommend that the proponent take the following actions to promote transit and ridesharing on -site: 1. Post transit /rideshare information and distribute to employees; 2. Distribute ridematch applications annually; 3. Provide secure bicycle parking; 4. Establish an Employee Transportation Coordinator; 5. Provide preferential car /vanpool parking; 6. Provide transit pass or carpool /vanpool subsidies; 7. Conduct periodic promotions; 8. Sell Metro monthly bus passes; 9. Encourage flexible work hours. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Very truly yours, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:smw cc: Don Winston • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor April 11, 1986 M.A. Segale PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Ann Nichols Re: CN -86 -102, Segale Buildin (FTC-317-86) The following comments and concer IFTTised during the environmental review of your project. They may not pertain to the environmental determina- tion, however, it was was requested that they be forwarded to you as they will need to be addressed during subsequent project reviews. Fire Department (Doug Gibbs, 433 -1850) 1. Two story office /bank building requires sprinklering per City Ordinance #1141 (attached). 2. Remote drive -up teller station if over 120 square feet will require fire alarm system per City Ordinance #1327 (attached). 3. Fire lanes must meet the requirements of City Ordinance #1110 (attached). 4. Fire hydrants must meet requirements of City Ordinance #729 (attached). Parks and Recreation Department (Don Williams, 433 -1843) 1. The site plan does not show a sidewalk by the railroad tracks and South 180th Street, however it does appear on the landscape plan. 2. It is requested the sidewalk on the east side of the project on South 180th Street meet and match the City's Christensen Trail. The City will be pleased to work with the contractor or developer to see how this can be done. 3. It is requested all sidewalks have appropriate ramps. 4. How will dike maintenance vehicles gain access to the dike road, and how will the road be surfaced? Page -2- M.A. Segale April 11, 1986 • 5. I have a concern that people will cross the railroad tracks anywhere and not just at the driveway crossings. Can something be done to discourage such potentially unsafe crossings? 6. The areas marked future plantings should be planted as soon as possible. Police Department (Pat Lowery, 433 -1822) 1. Please be cognizant of the contents of the Federal Banking Act of 1968 as revised by the Federal Depositors Insurance Corporation effective November 1, 1973. 2. Lighting and landscaping should conform to industry standards for a banking facility with outside teller services. If you should have any questions please don't hesitate to call the above listed individuals, or my self at 433 -1845. Respectfully, Becky L. Kent Permit Coordinator )?0L6 attachments cc: Doug Gibbs, Fire Marshal Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director Pat Lowery, Crime Prevention Public Not. CITY of TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 1141 TSG E ES• ASLHINMM UMUI FIRE QUIR ME TCTIOR SYSTEMS IN BUILD- INGS WRHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA USED FOR ASSEMBLY, EDU- RIAL, IN L, ISTtTUTIIOMSAL, MERCANFFFICE T AND MULTI- FAMILY DWEL- LING PURPOSES; AND REPEALING ORDI- NANCE 0730 IN ITS ENTIRETY. • MOW, THEREFORE, • • THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO.OR- DA1N AS FOLLOWS: Tukwila used for assembly, educational, Industrial, in- steutlonal, mercantile, stor- age, office and multi- family dwefling purposes shall be equipped with fire protection systems which meet the fol- lowing minimum require- ments. A. Sprinkler Systems Re- quired: A fully automatic sprinkler system designed, Installed and tested, per NFPA 013 (Current Edition) shall be installed in all new buildings In excess of 10,000 squ feet total floor area. B. A fully autom sprinkler system per above may be required the Chief of the Fire Dep ment and the Officer tion charge eau or new Prey Inge under 10.000 squ feet total floor area when their judgment, any of t following conditions exist Hazardous operation hazardous contents, pit exposure problems, limit accessibility to the build or other items which m contribute to definite 11 'hazards. C. Hose Stations Re- quired: Hose stations (stand- . pipes) shall be required In all new buildings. Hose shall be U.L. approved ed fire hose, , 75 feet diameter length with an adjustable (log-type) plastic shut off. type nozzle. 2. Design, Installation and testin3 of hose stations shall calmly with NFPA 014 (Cr-rent Edition) with any ' exceptions stated herein. 3. Hose stations shall be "wet." That Is, water pre- • *sure shall be present at the Individual station valves at alt times. 4. All hose fittings shall be National Standard Thread, Public Notices conflicts e�«� Building require- ments, nts, the more sbinpen (greatest protection) shat apply. E. My exceptions to items covered by Ordinance the Fire Department and the Officer In charge of the Fire • Pre exceptions n�aj. Su Ih writing. • F. Existing Buildings: 1. Existing fully 'prink -: • bred buildings when remod- Bled or added on to shah retain the feature of being aprdnldered In the remodeled or added on portion existing by on to an Ing total w rsithin the covens falls within the age of (A) or (8) of • structure Ordinance, the entire ' sprinklered. O. Repealer :. 1. Ordinance 0730 Is hereby repealed In its en- tirety. PASSED BY THE CITY , COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this 21st day of January, 1980. Frank Todd Mayor Are ATTEST: Norma Booher Deputy City Clerk atic Published In the Daily Re- (A)cord Chronicle January 25, 1980. T1510 art- in ven- Ild- are , in he a,.. dal ed ng. ay re ORDINANCE NO. 1199 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, TUKWILA g AB: LISHING CERTAIN MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR OF SPRINKLERS APPROVAL BUILD- INGS WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND AMENDING ' ORDINANCE NO. 1141. NOW, T THEREFORE, CRY COUNCIL O THE CITY OF TUKWILA, Public Notice WASHINGTON, DO OR DAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No 1141, passed by the C Council on January 21, 1980, Is hereby amended as follows: Buildings within the City of Tukwila for assembly, edu- cational, Industrial, InstItu- tional, mercantile, storage, office and multi - family dwel- ling purposes shall be equipped with fire protection systems which meet the fol- lowing minimum require- ments: kler Systems A July automatic sprinkler system designed, Installed and tested per NFPA 013 (Current Edition) and as ap- proved by the City of Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau and Washington Rating Bureau, Surveying other by the City, Oen be Instafied Public Notice - In all new bulidt gs In excess of 10,000 square feet total floor area. • City • No 'construction of such building shall be commenc- ed until approval for said btaiaineedd system has been he- rein amendedEalt�t� por- tions of Ordinance No. 1141 shall remain In full force and effect. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this 5th day of January, 1981. Frank Dodd qq Mayor Maxine Anderson City Approved as to Form: Clerk Lawrence E. Hard City PPublistt fed in the Dally Re- cord Chronicle January 8, 1981. T1830 • .ftrciALpiaTs;,....thlit CISYOP TUKwt1AwASNINO,ON OR DMA NCI MO. ►I0 AN ORDINANCE t$TA1411SNiNO 1 ►!C. IFICA11ON1 AND 1TANOAROI POR FIRE NYORANTS (N$TA(LEO 141114114 1,414 COOPORATO SWISS Of THE CITY OPTUKw1M • THE CITY CO111KI .OD TM OTT OU tVKW/1A, WAIHINO10I4 DO ORDAIN • AN lire h►dnde bssteRad WWI. We terp0r•N IMmile d nM OW el TebwR• shall 'wet or 'need 1ha tanning epac lI , canons and nadart . UMW, 1.TYPE..• • . yeM r,M Hads /110 cant1• American Wan Herbs Aueclglan Specllkatlae C 1071di Well M carrg?uteMtype end . shall awn • Iweplece bnst, donee .1111 Weigh, thlanbl M NW wood the el ONrwl sh'M lore • se1Mllr14 dry bonnet WM11 tacNry Mined rtserwwlr molding am pree1n111ely a'.roles of 111. Old ?runway shed haw M less Ikea 1 "O'• flag Nate. 011 reservoir shad be s• designed es N glee Sr camwNte lubkalbl of stems mum ' • lime the hydroid b prated. The toper • stem Shell have • bins skew.. ' . • Hydrates shed be equipped wIM he 7W' NUJ. how parts and any SW' N.i.t. punpw dhcMrp' ports awl shad have • 11•" pentagon pn.SMl awning nut. • Hydraah shalt have • r M.). bottom • connecter and S'A" mein van openlrngl • small be designed tar • O' bury sin shad Wm Ira abaft grade level NM* center 04. the purger discharge part. Hydrant color I• be •'Rwlefevm" 1117 vellew Glen. • Hydrants are N equal Mueller M•71011 or Mueller "A.ele. Bedlam I. INSTALLATION. ' Hydrants shad •N1 be closet than 1 140 • N any WHO: I.e. fences. parting. bulls i Ings. Mc. IwIM the 'sorption d hydrant I guard poste.) • Guard posh shad be installed 'round } blear ones not protected by (uvim so as N prevent an automobile from contacting the hydrant. The guard posts Mall be v • tither steel (minimum g•.• diameter) or concrete (minimum r• diameter,) Pmts i Mall be 3 feel Iran the center of 1ha hyd. rant and Mail not be in direct One &M i.; • any discharge ports. Pests Mall be • len ■ long: 3 • 3•• feel shall be burled. Painted A Hahn Men be theism* es for hydrants. • All hydrants Mad be petalled with an •.` eve111ary gale valve between Ile hydrant • • main valve ate 1h* water main. The gate t 1 valve Mail M U.L. wormed sin have • 1". • severe prating M. The valve Hall be Installed •t the hydrant•lataal Tee. II i tin hydrant Is greaten Man 10 feel from the main. IM gale valve shad be Installed In the lateral line. M Net Iran Hat hydrant. The protector cover ter IM valve Mall be 1ett In plain view. flush w1M grad' N•er land15M1.g at psvig• L Hydrants. •u.11lsry gate valves and supply Hn.. Mad be Installed M min Wand eginewring standards per NFPA •7A paragraph* Mt •O1. AOi des .4304 aoS. • t S'cIlon7.0011ERAGE. Nydr ants shall be plated N Mgt no point I d • building (from/ 111 perinwl'rl 11 - greater then 7a0 IM hem • hydrant. • . Winn 91005101Wal or ca structlen 1 leatwrw p?•'04 the 01151., d water mains 'Adler hydrants. the AN. Pr•••• Hon limier may lutharlte de use el am. proved "wed hydrants" M Mailer de. new. Such evthorlutIon must be In nil. Ing. • • . .1 • 1acfentACCl1111111TY. ' ' Hydrants Mall be N ptein plies ter • 11114•1411 S0 1'04 M Me lie 04 vehkvler •opreaesl. Write Irene IINyq. /lees. fencoe.'SWUM'''. etch • The •M• /u••e', ditcher,/ Mrs WN tau the street. er M the came et prt'Ml /Hereof*. mad loco loom" Me ..fir— — • • • 11121111111113:WWWIla . We eel Annply flaw WN be 04 WM, Nee e.w Onion as 1• mends Ile required • Inn tow as recammernded by Me View. Irwin loner sod RNMg E,s., Harr. Tapeh, Ines CMy caster ►babe 011.0 11 E► We prowls Mew* N "wl.lgpph,." Y as N anew entteetfepM a•yvke am Ohms Sodlea s. I KC E P TIONI.. AIM s.w11w r Is Netts amered by 1110 Ordinance 0.$ be made be M 01104 had the Fin DnertnwM •410 No Officer 1041 thong' et the Flee Prevention SWUM e/ Nit Tea wile Flee Department. Sorb eft! I Skew Pant be la trolling. • PAWED 14Y tie CNy C .ucR gad a►:' Mewed by tine Mayor 11 a rgelM meeting 1 Memel en . 11111 day M Sep,tmber. •j M71 FRANKTO00 Mayes Afltst: SOUR E A. K•NNEY City ere • AOpre.ed as le Firm: WAYNER.PARKER City Attorney 1 • • • • PUblia . 1 . • .-.. •:...431Pili iakvilli '. ' • • '.!..Washinglon '• - ' . • ORDINANCE NO. 1110 ... AN ORDINANCE OF . THE CITY OT TUICW1- .. LA, WASHINGTON, ES- TAM:MING THE RE- ' • OUIREMENTS AND EN- • FORCEIAMT PROM • . °URI FOR HARD- .. .• SURFACED FIRE LANES II • REPEAUNG • : ORDINANCE NO757. .. : • NOW, •THEREFORE, , THE CRY ' COUNCIL OF • %THE -ClY OF nnoviu.. WASHINGTON, DO OR- I DAIN'AS FOLLOWS: ' Sectiori 1 - Definitions. ..The following definable . shall apply In eve Interpreta- tion and enforcement of this ordinance. 1 '. ' A. Fire Lane: lbst area . ; . with awry public right of !, way, easement, or pd- • . vete property designated fOr Om purpose of um*. **fire trucks and other fire fighting or ernergen-• cy equipment to . use, .. Sorel upon and park. • • B. Park, Parking, Stop, Stand or Standing: • • Means the halting of a ..." vehicle. Other than an • emergency vehicle. •.• .' Whether occupied or not, except when necessary to avoid Conflict with dn- .: er traffic or in compliance with the directions of • police officer Of fire ofil- • dal or trafIc-control sign kr sifinal- .- • C. Vehicle: A machine propeNed by power other than human power de- • • signed to travel along the • ground or rat by use of wheels, treads. runners .. or slides; and transport . • persons or property, or Viu:dm:, dlkiery and shall , without ed :. lions, a N* utarrobile, trudc, • • Peer, motorcycle, an-. kx,. WEN. Wagon and • •...locomoNve......1..!:..::.:...-. er-sawnrr Standerils. When re quired by the Fire Depart- ment. hard-stelaced driving lanes 411111 'be provided around faidlities nilich by their stirs, location, design or contents warrant access which exceeds that normally povided by the Elloicknity of ally struts. • A. Lanes shoe provide a • unobstructed - •continuous width and . :hed12f. . B. Lames shoe be 'den- • lilted by a 4-inch wide. ' Ina and biodc letters 2 • feet high, painted in ihe tans. at 50 fod intervals • sUffing,-"FIRE LANE - • NO PARTKING", color to • be !night yellow, or by the of signs stating, .rFsiti LANE - NO :PARKING". Signs shall be posted on crbn- • modality next to the curb line, or on the build- • Ing. Signs shall be 12" x • 18" and shall have letters and bedcground of con- • treating colors. redly readable from at least a • 50-fo01 distance. Signs • ihall be spaced not furth- er than 50 feet apart nor !shire they be more than 4 • feet from the ground. C. Fire lanes shall be either asphalt or reinforc- ed concrete, 2 inches --edok, minimum, a When. - specifically authorized by the Fire Deparirlent, coed crushed rock rimy be used. • • D. Mier* flre.lanee Con- dty streets Of -311andrig Ad& adequate .4114ra:ices and radii tette. be AN proposed plane must 41have Fire .Deportment 101)/9YOL..• • • ..• .-BiliEdrIP Paddle Prat- Med. Except when war- m! to _avoid confect with other Wit, or in acre- dance with the direction of a police officer or lire official°, Sado control sign, signel or device, no person shd: A. Stop, stand cc put e vehicle, whether occupied or ! not at any place where dil- 1 del 0 Nu signs are post- ed. sued: 1. Momentarily to pidt up t • 0, 111••hvg• • P•••••0- 1 Of Of pesoongoro; Of . • r 2. Tempera*/ for the • purpose of and vtigle• actually engaged in load- ing or unionding pro- Section - Fke Lanes as • Pert of Driveways end or- /Parldng Amu. lb* Fire • Department • may require that areal VedlNd for use U driveways or Ovate e arse shall not be used paridrp. These • arum when spedfled, shalt be marked or identified by one cd the two means de- tailed In Section 2(0). • Section 5 Inge. When the Fire D.pwt. -mint determines that a hazard due to inaccessibMry of fire apparatus exists around existing buildings, •they may require lire lanes to be constructed and main- ! brined u detailed In Section 2 and Section 4. • ' Section 8- Enfon:ement. It shall be thelointdutyolthe Tukwila Police Chief and the then _euthorized_„.. enlorcs'Wh—ordinenco Notated to Section 3. II shall be the duty of the Tukwila fire Chief or his mehortzed designed.) to ardent* the • other sedions of this ord- Alarm. Sidon 7 Pintas& Any • person violating any 01 8* paisiona of this Ordinenc:e shell be gully of misde- meanor, end Upon convic- tion, shall result in a fine of not more than ti-five: (825.00) dollars Of by Impris- onment for not more than. (30)._■biriprrtatiymentboth ang r - R . epealer- iiity 101 Tukwila Ordinance No. 757 Is hereby repealed. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASSED BY THE CITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at • regular meeting thereof Ns 7th day of May, 1979. 1.• ,) .Edger D. Bauch • •s Mayor • ATTEst . • Maxine Anderson • • City Otak Approved u to Form: iLawrence E. Hard Published In the Daily Re-' cord Chronicle May 13,. City Attorney AFFIWAVIT I, Kathryn A. Stetson [[ Notice of Public Hearing [l Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [l Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [( Planning Commission Agenda Packet [( Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [] Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 1 Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I O T I O N hereby declare that: Determination of Nonsignificance NFitigated Determination of Non - significance [l Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Q Notice of Action Official Notice [[ Other [[ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on April 10, Washington State Department of Ecology Shorelands Division MS PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Washington State Department of Ecology SEPA Division MS PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 METRO Environmental Planning Division Attn: Eileen Kadish 821 Second Avenue, MS 63 Seattle, WA 98104 Name of Project Building 862 - Segale File Number EPIC 317 -86 , 1986. 7 Signature WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal Mitigated DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Two story concrete office /bank building and associated drive up teller station on 2.77 acre site. Proponent Mario A. Segale, d /b /a Segale Business Park Location of Proposal, including street address, if any southeast corner of intersection of Andover Park West and S. 180th Street NE $, Section 35, Township 23 N, Range 4E, W.M. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 31 -86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. J There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by April 24, 1986 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This DNS is issued subject to the conditions in Attachment A. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA' 98188 Date tf'- r Signature -t& C- l o You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Attachment A Mitigating Measures for Epic 317 -86 1. Curb cuts and access to 180th Street to be approved by the Tukwila Public Works Department prior to issuance of the Shoreline Substantial Develop- ment Permit. 2. Review hydraulics of existing storm water system relative to elevations on site prior to issuance of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. CITY OF TUKWILA • 00 81p /O CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 3i7-g(p FILE gb-/3 d 40 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:owythiiti 42141 U J t '.,tzD, ey/c? , / ,L/n L TO: [ BLDG PLNG ('I P.W. FIRE ] POLICE j° P & R TOM H YYI0i /Gi.13 ,J AMA) F ,Doug (y. fb t 1-. Dm, u) PROJECT ‘,...5e/(-142j, LOCATION 0, J gO J c ands aM(7 /67A t ,4 G DATE TRANSMITTED 142/ gl!' - PONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR //♦ 1 Y' �I`�..,.; RESPONSE RECEIVED FILE NO. Vy "I c5d7143 t/%8/0 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC IVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE I ALI At 4' Alf i 2411709C//.4,701 10.0191017 /,6S-.4* Mit_' ArtilltINCOL !s'" 4, r �. ` i L _/ e ..,./.0,0111170,511M7 //g /, ,&( /d::Fr /� AMY !) NO S „Orwirr // /� xp/o 4.* `i .r OV % � ATE I iVe - MMENTS PREPARED BY / / /Far w /0„;„ .P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN V!a l02 EPIC 3/7- ;(p FILE Mr/3-617140 /OLV/V -0/ 614, /, nV i r'( POLICE P & R �i,t 1- Don, w !r49Nk ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: r±i BLDG Fri PLNG P.W. Tam 14. moi/a, �3, p i F. PROJECT \`eld (di E LOCATION 0, )'Q,Kt, ol (,/ di ,Mdab ia/6 E FILE NO. Mr/,' "i%n40 DATE TRANSMITTED AIolO 6) " P_ONSE REQUESTED_ BY L.aga_. STAFF COORDINATOR 4/0 / Vi /. tI./6.____ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC IVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE /l/v e%1 W I-64 /144,th'f ( M 6e-a-/1 s -- 6911110.€4-e5 41- y ,6 u 2v1 AeA c.c_ reVf.5..e eitirc-401.eoir in /ate- is/4141 e Ir .C4t.u,i vte.v4.e.4,-1 gto COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA •N V ID 2 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 317-0 FILE Vp1 3 b 40 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: 60Ore.//)1 ,.t 81c, , 1"wniT TO: EJ BLDG PLNG ] P.W. FIRE t POLICE ( P & R PROJECT Tom 14, mowa- &, PW) F. Doug (7. ,-$.t �- .`' ,Ov L) : `6140,0 LOCATION 2, )5)0,m, A'd, i /iclO J 7 FILE NO. .y (0-16o DATE TRANSMITTED 1/ Pig& PONSE REQUESTED BY til v o STAFF COORDINATOR lip [/. (/i /. �I�......; RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC IVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT * * ** *PLEASE BE COGNIZANT OF THE CONTENTS OF THE FEDERAL BANKING ACT OF 1968 AS REVISED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSITORS INSURANCE CORPORATION EFFECTIVE NOV. 1, 1973. LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING SHOULD CONFORM TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR A BANKING FACILITY WITH OUTSIDE TELLER SERVICES. 4/7/86 pil DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA •CN ?(Q (Q , CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC 3/7- ?(p FILE $(x'13 d ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:6IQ»'eLi/t4 OW tv i1,40/ 61414, 1"-(.urUt TO: a BLDG fl PLNG (eel P.W. FIRE r41 POLICE P & R PROJECT c I .�.P moifc /5. Amij F 4)09 (7, 1-, DM, w LOCATION 0, ) ()Y'h ol:c C id/ ,WdCJ 4) 014 FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 1Wg , - PONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR 1,• / L/ /. tl�...... RESPONSE RECEIVED I THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC IVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT , /III ( 6 o rYUY1, tr AT g /6 44t DATE COMMENTS PREPAR C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN Vp IDS EPIC 3/7- FILE 8060-13-6040 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:WI'l ith/U)1 (26(//' / / 1 6th , / unit TO: a BLDG Efl PLNG P.W. [ FIRE tri POLICE P & R PROJECT -Dm t . ca, Mo /a l3 , P,H,C) F. ,Doug Lr • - .i.t 1-. LOCATION 0,3 , o )& 6316-b andow fob d,✓ FILE NO. VD -1 e71-c5 DATE TRANSMITTED 1/0/80 PONSE REQUESTED. BY : _ in/84 f STAFF COORDINATOR 1,, / Vi /. RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC IVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE yip/re( COMMENTS PREPARED BY Pror-u.-.'/' C.P.S. Form 11 . o CITY OF TUKWILA Control # Ufi- /Ua CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - INFORMAa TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM •rnit/File #317-86 PROJECT \hipe' STAFF REVIEWER // 7 a1- BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO " SM TTE�y O THE APpLIQANT/DEVELQ EARie dd iv L� p1 t O41 (�'� i �J_/� fbrmaJ t�'NG .. W%.�Lt u/L(�0, (( ,,II ��:^ 00.� Q - ►-ci 614 e /f 4 /G /314i MI 4 re ai Lc. gyres y i-(n KLeH (zi- p 0/-9 ca //4 / 6-14Y-Aild --p h v -ttp - lee Al 1:i b 04- /?o 5Q ��-t tt 1 l ❑ reau►re, a- - C"tlr, ellt rr►yk r Ct Ord , /3g7 Q /saes �ius�" `led" e ,-e Quty es4eths e6 / //o (41rAtAef • cih' 4ts nitiftsver / uce* eii± o+ f1- A-4.147,31 (4.- ee .a a 0 0 Q 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer ❑ I contacted applicant /developer (name) on Please follow -up with me on my concerns by (date) (date) CPS FOLLOW -UP Ej Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on (date) Distributed copy of letter to file #s: Comments Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence to staff person and appropriate files. Control # 8!P " / CITY OF TUKWILA 0� CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - INFORMAIION TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM •rmit /File # 31,740 PROJECT 9-01/ STAFF REVIEWER ein - /-l/ BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO SM TTED ta.c ut writeij/72._forrna,t, 11 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • J 804) (pct f,`tcll07,6v y ail EtuA , EVEL PEER d �U` G a A 7 ,/ i / i ,/_ / errs /�� 0 CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer 0 I contacted applicant /developer 0 Please follow -up with me on my concerns by (date) name) on CPS FOLLOW -UP M Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on Distributed copy of letter to file #s: Comments (date) Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence to staff person and appropriate files. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy for heating, cooking, lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Double glazing of windows, others to code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might berequir -d. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise during construction Automobile noise atter completion 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant. . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not for at least ten years. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only ( Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Heavy Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban. h. Has .any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, within 200 feet of Green River. i. Approximately how many p opple wo ld reside or work in the completed project?( 50 1 • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Is compatible with existing and surrounding office and industrial land uses. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 feet Concrete, glass b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only -13- 13. Historic and Cultural ?Preservation a. Are there any plates or.objects listed on, or pro- posed for, natiorraa:l, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeoTcDgical, scientific, or cultural importance known tc be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures .v reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Andover Park West, Andover Park East, ---gT—ISUFh Street West Va ey Highway Viand l -5 • b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, on site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Will have 118.par i g spaces, 'll liminate nnne Evaluation for Agency Use Only ( Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Does not apply. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire and police to cover project; health care only insofar as tenants might require emergency care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Tenant security system. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Conti No. WD "hQ aZ Epic File No. 3,7- ?6' Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 0510 Building 862 2. Name of applicant: Mario A. Segale, d/b /a Segale Business Park 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P. 0. Box 88050, Tukwila, WA 98188 - Attn: Ann Nichols 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/24/86 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence construction spring of 1986, expected completion - 5 months. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Impact Statement for Segale Business Park. Shoreline Nnagement Substantial Development Permit - 1974. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No, do not know of any. • 10. List any government approvals or. permits that will be needed for your proposal. Shoreline Permit Building Permit BAR Revi-ewi & Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not, need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. - 'I story concrete office/bank building and associated remove drive -up teller station. 26 489', SF Building 2.77 Acre Site 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While, you should . submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. SEC Intersection of Andover Park West and S. 180th Street. Tukwila. WA NE 1/4, Sec. 35, Township 23 N, Range 4E, W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, portion lies within the Shoreline Management Urban Environment. (Within ZUU feet of Green River.) TO, 'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAte • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, ' specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor site grading for drainage and landscapeing source (import gravel borrow). . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the • proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust. construction machine odors during construction. Automobile odors after completion. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water . a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Green River. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Landscape along toe of dike, driveways, parking areas, portion of building. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None, project will be served by Tukwila sewer system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff will be collected in catch basins and discharged into an existing storm water system which is pied into the Green River by the City of Tukwila . • • Evaluation for. Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No adverse impacts are expected. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ..X other types of vegetation - weeds. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A11. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing vegetation will be removed and replaced with plants natural to the Pacific Northwest such as Juniper, Photinea, etc. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None observed mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None observed fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None observed b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not aware of any. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not aware of any. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy for heating, cooking, lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Double glazing of windows, others to code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None. IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise during construction Automobile noise after completion 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant. . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.. Not for at least ten years. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. III Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Heavy Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? urban. h. Has .any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, within 200 feet of Green River. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 50 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Is compatible with existing and surrounding office and industrial land uses. . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 feet Concrete, glass b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. Glazing reflectivity less than 15% (non - reflective glass). b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, primarily concrete Glazed window fenestration with reflectivity of less than 15% (non - reflective glass). c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Types of lighting (building and parking lot) will be restricted to interior .of site. . 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Green River TYailentry. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Project is close to Green River Trail entrance. • 13. Historic and Cultural preservation a. Are there any plus or .objects listed on, or pro- posed for, natiorra-Al., state, or local preservation registers known to✓ be on or next to the site? If so, generally descr—ibe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeoTcgical, scientific, or cultural importance known t be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Andover Park West, Andover Park East, ---S7-1TOTh Street West Val1 Highway an 1- b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, on site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Will have 118 parking spaces will eliminate none Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,-generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Does not apply. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire and police to cover project; health care only insofar as tenants might require emergency care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Tenant security system. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently /electricity, natural gas, /telephone, sanitary sewer, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only available at the site: water, refuse service,/ /septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Power; Washington Natural.Gas, Water District #75, Tukwila Sewer, Seattle Transfer, .Pacific Northwest Bell, City of Tukwila Water C. Signature The above answers are true and complete my knowledge. I understand that the relying on them to make its decision. to the best of lead agency is Signature: Date Submitted: 2118u TO.8E,COMPLETED BY APPLICA• 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the contekt of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Develop two story concrete office building and remote drive -up banking facility. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Build an alternate design or use alternate materials. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Other designs and materials have been considered, evaluated and eliminated. The proposed project represents the preferred course of action. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? NO. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -23- CITY OF T U AVVI LA ' -13 5)1( -1° Central Permit System qua • co MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM • PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. S SECTION I: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: D BSIP f NOR SUBDIVISION ®SNORELINE a pRD D PMUD' IS2I BAR PERMIT INTERURBAN 0 CONDUSEONAL ❑UNUSESS. VARIANCE ZC I G AMENDMENT 1) APPLICANT: NAME Mario A. Segale d/b /a Segale/ Busines TELEEPPH NE ( 206 ) 575 -3200 ADDRESS P. 0. Box 88050, Tukwila, WA . ' ° ZIP 98188 2) PROP. OWNER: NAME Same as Above TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS ZIP 3) PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) SEC Intersection Andover Park West and S. 180th Street, Tukwila, WA SECTION 11: PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE Two Story .Concrete Office /Bank Facility with Remote Drive -up Teller Station 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM 5/86 TO 10/86 6.) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? DYES (NO IF YES, DESCRIBE: 7) PROJECT STATISTICS: A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET 2.4 GROSS 2.77 20' RR = 0.23 15' Util = 0.1( EASEMENTS Total = .22 B) FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL 1, FLOORS Two INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT O MEZZANINE TOTAL GROSS 26,489 INCLUDES: D BASEMEN 0 MEZZAN1NE FLOOR AREA C) SITE UTILIZATION: . EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES ZONING DESIGNATION M -2 M -2 COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION M -2 M -2 BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 0 c 12,597 O LANDSCAPE AREA 0 0 12.000 O PAVING AREA 0 O 95.160 0 TOTAL PARKING TALLS: -STANDARD S r` r 0 90 - COMPACT SIZE 0 23 - HANDICAPPED SIZE 0 8 TOTAL LOADING SPACES 0 0 AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA 1% *AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 0 8) 1S THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERAT1CN ON THE CITY•S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE MAP? D YES 1 NO rolA GeoEnglneers Incorporated (2061746 -5200 P.O. Box6325 Consulting Geotechnical 2405 - 1401h Ave. N. E. Bellevue, WA 98008 Engineers and Geologists Segale Business Park, Inc. 18010 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington 98067 Attention: Mr. Mario Segale Mr. George Crawford Gentlemen: February 24, 1986 Report Geotechnical Studies Proposed Two -Story Office Structure Segale Business Park Tukwila, Washington File No. 291 -04 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical studies at the site of a proposed two -story office building. The site is located on the southeast corner of 180th and Andover Park West in Tukwila, Washington. The proposed structure will be oriented such that the walls are at an angle of approximately 45 degrees with adjacent streets. We understand that the finished floor and finished yard grades are planned at Elevations 25 and 23.3, respectively. Existing site grades range from approximately Elevation 20 to 23.5 and are the result of regrading done in 1972. Prior to that, site grades ranged from approximately Elevations 22 to 26. Several explorations have been done on and adjacent to the site in the past. They include a boring located to the south of the site, two boring, and three Dutch cone penetration tests located immediately west of Andover_ Park and west of the site, and numerous test pits, one of which is located in the building footprint. • • Segale Business Park, Inc. February 24, 1986 Page Two SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soils are alluvial deposits consisting of interbedded silt, sandy silt and silty sand underlain by a thick unit of fine to medium sand. The test pit excavated within the building footprint to a depth of 12,feet (Elevation 13) encountered a 3- foot -thick layer of silt between Elevations 18 and 21. Below that, silty sand with occasional thin layers of sandy silt was encountered to the depth excavated (Elevation 13). Based on our review of nearby borings, we interpret that the silty sand unit extends down to approximately Elevation 5 and is underlain by the medium dense to \dense sand unit. This sand unit extends to below the depth of the borings which were drilled to 90 feet or to Elevation -75. Ground water levels observed in nearby borings range from about 8 to 9 feet below the ground surface in March 1983. Recent test pits show the water level about 11 feet below the ground surface. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the site be developed by a combination of overexca- vation and surcharging similar to the way other buildings have been developed in the immediate area. This procedure will help control postconstruction settlement and allow support of the structure on shallow spread foundations. The existing soil should be overexcavated to a depth of at least 2 feet below the bottom of footings. Backfill should consist of gravelly sand pit run material placed in layers of appropriate thickness for uniform compaction, and compacted to 95 percent of its maximum dry density determined in accor- dance with ASTM D -1557, test procedures. All material up to the floor slab level should be compacted. To help control postconstruction settlement, we recommend that 6 feet of surcharge fill be placed. We have assumed that the surcharge fill will weigh approximately 135 pcf. The top of the surcharge fill should extend 5 feet beyond the footings and slope down at the natural angle of repose. Settlement of the surcharge fill should be monitored at three or four locations. This can be done by driving hubs into the completed fill and GeoEngineers Incorporated • • Segale Business Park, Inc. February 24, 1986 Page Three -taking survey level readings referencing a benchmark well outside the influence of the fill. The surcharge fill should be left in place until the maximum settlement observed is less than 0.01 feet per week. For foundations supported on a minimum of 2 feet of compacted fill we recommend an allowable design bearing of 2000 pounds per square foot for all dead and real live loads exclusive of the weight of the footing and backfill over the footing. The recommended allowable may be increased by one -third for the total of all loads including wind and /or seismic. The footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade and have minimum widths of 16 inches and 2 feet for continuous and isolated footings, respectively. We trust that the foregoing meets your present needs. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please call. < U ^�s r. ,HEN0i 4,; . . o 9 .' i .S 'pQ. t i:-, c%\ %- /,��rC% GWH:wd L' rIL I' .rvo°' Two copies submitted Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. sy4 / 44(teha-brk Gary W. Henderson Principal GeoEngineers Incorporated Mr141 HIS 01S010I1 DIr1 SSUMISf I nYIS • •t•M- .O► .�irwi_t) � ✓.t. r• r __a at • /4 M V• ,w • %SYry .911r,f4•• _ , F ...4'y F! - / j 6 • ••• 'v_.& '`�!''.`:.,:vv,,: "uNra 111.. .n1't1'wi1/.; :1174411M1i11'II M1119,p�liM11^_IIM'A'._'bt'J)f 1 i:a'I! ;)il1 ij t,pllld!iil11l! " "NC.614!/?.. . w ' •I•' ,.» 41 "ill ,s 1 r arc si. SEGALE 862 BUILDING N HIN TO • 1 .me Mbomou` • ••• _.., ..••• .... s. •.. SEGALE 862 �; BUILDING T,KT«