The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-32-87 - KAISER GATEWAY ASSOCIATES - GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTERGATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION INTERURBAN AVE, 48T" AVE. S., 42ND AVE. S. & DUWAMISH RIVER EPIC -32 -87 *METRO ‘\f\ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 February 24, 1988 Rick Beeler Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Non - Significance File No.: EPIC -32 -87 Kaiser Gateway Associates Dear Mr. Beeler: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:plg ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FEB 24 1988 Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 45. 6000 t PLANNING DEPT. February 22, 1988 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Gateway Corporate Center proposed by Kaiser Gateway Associates (EPIC- 32 -87). We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. As noted in the checklist, a shoreline permit will be re- quired for this project. The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Linda Rankin of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459 -6763. BJR: cc: Linda Rankin Sincerely, Barbara J. (Ritchie Environmental Review Section FE! r,1.c;l,;7 `01 !7L�1��J�S X4.1 7ce1504, A aD6) /4v4 Ae6 AF DAVIT OF 01STRO UTION 1, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: J Notice of Public Hearing J Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [[ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet J Planning Commission Agenda Packet J Short Subdivision Agenda Packet X JX, Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of. Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice 0 Notice of Application for [] Other Shoreline Management Permit J Shoreline Management Permit J Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on (SEE ATTACHED AGENCIES) Name of Project GATEWAY CORPORATF CFNTFR File Number EPIC -32 -87 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1988 , 19 . STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY •ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAIL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BEATTY SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST #406 9690 SOUTH 144TH SEATTLE, WA 98168 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHORELANDS DIVISION MAIL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BEATTY METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV MS 92 -821 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 ATTN: MANAGER KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ATTN: LARRY KIRCHNER 3001 N.E. FOURTH RENTON, WA 98056 PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT ATTN: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 10608 N.E. 4TH STREET BELELVUE, WA 98004 PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL ATTN: ENGINEER (EIS REVIEW) 300, S.W. SEVENTH STREET RENTON, WA 98055 WASHINGTON. NATURAL GAS ATTN: WILLIAM FRY P.O. BOX 1869 SEATTLE, WA 98111 KING CO. BUILDING & LAND DEV. 3600 - 136TH PL. S.E. BELLEVUE, WA 98006 -1400 ATTN: ALTON SMITH SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPT 1015 3RD AVENUE RM 922 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Gn•9 •..c' -. _,..F;1i" r' ~ mil! _ }•: J"` � . _ • • CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS ( ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department ( ) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency ( )Dept. of Social and Health Services ()4Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division (>1-Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * ( )Department of Game ( )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Dept. of Planning & Community Devel. ( ) Fire District 18 ( ) Boundary Review Board q>1 Health Department (South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library (, Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Washington Natural Gas ( Water District 75 ( ) Seattle Water Department ( ) Group W Cable ( ) Kent Planning Department ( ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ( ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ( ) - -Public Works ( ) - Parks and Recreation ( ) - Police ( ) - Fire ( ) - Finance ( ) - Planning /Building ( )Fire District 1 ( )Fire District 24 ()Building & Land Development Division - SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES (Puget Sound Power & Light ( )Val -Vue Sewer District ( )Water District 20 ( )Water District 25 ( )Water District 125 ( )Union Pacific Railroad CITY AGENCIES )Renton Planning Department )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: )- Edgar Bauch )- Marilyn Stoknes )- Joe Duffie )- Mabel Harris )- Charlie Simpson )- Jim McKenna )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) ( ) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency ( ) Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce MEDIA ( ) Daily Journal of Commerce ( ) Renton Record Chronicle )METRO Environmental Planning Division Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times • City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1988 TO: AFFECTED GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, PLANNING DEPARTMEN SUBJECT: GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER - EIGHT LOT COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION If you have any recommendations regarding the attached pre- liminary plat, please file recommendations with the Planning Department by February 25, 1988, or call Moira Carr Bradshaw at 433 -1848. WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Gateway Corporate Genter- an Eight Lot Commercial Industrial Subdivision Proponent Kaiser Gateway Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF fl5- 32 -SS, LOCATED BETWEEN INTERURBAN AVENUE, 48TH AVENUE SOUTH, THE 42ND. AVFNUE SOUTH BRIDGE. AND THE DUWAMISH RIVER. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -32 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [[ There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by FEBRUARY 25, 1988 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevar Date F . 0 � � Signature Phone 433 -1846 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter. Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • • DESCRIPTION en coelein neat props., of Cow., of ben, pass. of Ste C Clean Me 07, . yen.. West. Damp 4 E. er *ens. an Pod*, lots I,E., 4 sit et. ens. Corse.. Center 100-3,1307 ord DP ed Sures.. • 0011170001 ...W. in .4 C., state of Wesintrupon, C. Lasts Demernort land O TesonsIns CS .4 Pew, ewere 0.4.4artu NOTES • - Ituestin.siem 4eness4 ✓ ead. under ...••■010.220, 51,0 in5. tow. A.F. eppoval. 2. Prior to final plat approval on lots 2 and 7 and bts 11, 3. and 6, a recipocal easement/agreement utilities and storm drainage facilitien vehicular im pedestrian Mgress ancl even and 1.1,41.14, .14. parking of mot. vehicles into, out of, on ore, AM /dr.', the stated lots including all parking aaaaa , ingress and egress points, service drives dull. povided. 3. Site and adjoinMg poperties on south side of the Eitiwamish Rivet are in City of Tukwila Zoning District WI. Properties on the north side of the °wenn. River, within City ol Tukwila limits are as noted (R-1-72 and R-Nh oithin uninconwated Xing County are SubortwaResIdential IS-R). • 6. Tne Ida-year M.o. Elevation ol 13.2 is in Zone P-1, per Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, Community Panel No. 130091 PO10. • .7. 4••• /. z • / ' I ' r 4' gi ' , 1,\: • - - // , :Lj • , / .1 -.'. ----7 7:— 1 V I 1 ri Al ;.c;. \ '''' s .:-r- -4,,„......,---- / e , • .: t '. s' '.4:°."'-',,,..""-K„\--,1"z".: - , _,^ . \t.'• ;...,, 1—r- --a- — -- --C-- _..,. ,, . " a • -:',.."7•...:,) ,... -.. GAT iEWAY DI? i ___ VICINITY MAP sxs LEGEND: Esi.trn P40 —es- • • • • • =1 Erl _if_ MAO, Cireunnon 0.6r/Dersiops. lesase.trosse aenares 5001-71.16, V. 504.11 Esgamr/Surveyor: wseay 4 as. RE'.-2&".7.• %PAN I-657*. =7,,t4I513.77531 Z01313 M —I Arsa Calcutta:Y. LOA. .56_ 176551 4.05 • C05•10 4 37 3 101;375 Z • %05003 Z. 5 I3A35 (7. ▪ 114.544 C. '7 573434 1J10 • 33.711 ars 5 5' .p.8 002 24w7 153455 5. IL.. 137334. 60.40 9- PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY (SEATTLE CITY LIGHT) ROW t INTERURBAN AVEACE ' -117 / .10.10/111110 KING COUNTY s CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [l BLDG El PLNG P.W. (l FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT 447-gAMy A P C J 6bi V 15i E ) LO CATION;Z Uhf UWJEH►1I,4�u 576 ay FILE -NO. DATE TRANSMITTED %a ?/ 3/ % RESPONSE REQU STED BY //7/8 STAFF COORDINATOR -i4f 1dam & aleli RESPONSE 4tE,U/IL_______ CN EPIC 2- ) 7 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY //) // C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM c. E P I C FILE 87_1_5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: PLNG Q P.W. FIRE [] POLICE 0 P & R 0 T0: Q BLDG PROJECT ' WA' 4/ ��i l C_ 0•1 A �yt ems: ► (V S! /J' i � C" YA'. FILE NO. ___/17/_S_______ LOCATION �/v � �i �� ' �3 '7 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY / DATE TRANSMITTED /• � RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR -cd:. i THE _ ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THISDING PROJECT. THRESHOLD PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN PLANNING ENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDIN THE CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY --Ag----------- C.P.S. Form 11 • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Future site development along river max utilize some native species and existing trees aloes river will be retained to the extent possible. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the sate: bird : haw,/heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Possible songbirds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Possible Salmon in river b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Future construction during normal work day hours over short term. Incremental increase in traffic noise over long term. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None S. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Approximately two years ago was pasture land. c. Describe any structures on the site. Site has recentl constructed high •ua_' buildings. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation; a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Avenue S. - See Plat Map. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Do not know. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Quantity of new spaces to conform to required amount for use. None will be eliminated. • Alialuation for ency Use Only d. Will the proposal ro osal require any new roads or streets, roads or streets, not or improvements to exisif gso, generally describe including driveways? If (indicate whether public or private). ova underway. No - roadway already constructed for ate_ — — Will the project use (or occur in the immediate e. Wi of) water, rail, or air transportation? If vicinity so, generally describe. No. vehicular trips per day would be generated f. How many d project? If known, indicate when by the completed _ __-- -- peak volumes would occur. Approximately 2,000 - g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: As condition of ,revious a••rovals a,.licant makin installation im.rovements to Inte of si nal at 133rd. 15. Public Services Would the project result in an increased protection, a• (for example: other)? If public services (health care, schools, police protection, so, generally describe. None other than that associated with business to reduce or control direct b. Proposed measures __---- - impacts on public services, if any•- — None -- CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM •CN EPIC 43' FILE e7 -/ -5d8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG El PLNG n P.W. El FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT 4/41764/0 Kfk Orl i f! e . vi f)i er& LOCATION (ie_FAMVUli��' /PP FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED a/3 /c 7 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY //,7 STAFF COORDINATOR -d RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 7-110d. / Ocsirmoote-- DATE ./ "7' COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM TCN coacyzi EPIC - E FILE 87- / -5)18 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Ei BLDG Q PLNG Q�_,PP .Wes. FIRE n' /POLICE El P & R PROJECT 447/4)/ ��l /f'I (� 50 b( V I..ssi vk LOCATION 2J7 Y IWfillv/VOLPI ej6 4Y1r. FILE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED '/3/@ 7 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY //1/o STAFF COORDINATOR, i� /9 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT Z 3 e e ne/e-- / 7 /17/ " 1 "67 7 ,�►� ems• 7S 1-hi/J 1h clkie d kc � ✓i / <y l � � l�4L�iS a r c4/0/.00/ 1;1 f4 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA •CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: FILE Oa-g3 7 137/ -a)630 TO: E[ BLDG [f PLNG (j P.W. es �(i FIRE J j /POLICE (i P & R PROJECT ('4*' e� eloa61 - e_re Silt V i i LOCATI0N,1 /7 ketlye i11L',fOU1J i 4Y FILE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED /G,/ 3/e 7 Pile‘ STAFF COORDINATOR-J ,RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /`7//? RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /J1, /'/1 d'ic.(0� /J' d:OD 49:26 floir.4,1 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 WILSEY & HL*1 ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Improvements • Land Development • Thutsportation 1980 112TH AVENUE N.E. /P.O. BOX C -97304 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98009 -7730 (206) 454 -3250 TO lVA - ®• TvILt,4 i Lb (07,0 0 tl.vD , —1-%) \L w k tat, ldclIS,6.lr∎AlT�N $156c6 Ov t� Go WE ARE SENDING ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Attached ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Under separate cover via • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 1 70/70 I /% 1 JOB NO. ATTENTION: RE: `1 b"ire w.6.9 C N TIft.R. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED ❑ For your info -file (As requested ❑ For review and comment COPIES DESCRIPTION e". 4- m r- Fzj4v1 t41..e."4-d. L GJA- eGlL-L4' � 1-. MEMORANDUM - REMARKS s't- ray �y,-rt` 0 N o t4 t1- /ZI t-o st 43 -n- co Sv tit w► e."4- k- L. t's-I- C71,- 0- w 3 `7,--e, C-f T'4,r 4 - 1 - T 6c U . -ro -r" a�lc , • c & P e c 1 c So -17A1 1 'vim -tom e. >' o tiro 1" '21 . 714 U.011( S cs.c -cb io v ° - c. e etc— 1✓O" '7„ 4, 0 ovt s 0%.) {Z SIGNED: \A1pg COPIES - �k- 1-f-9 AVM UEC 23 1987 CITY oF TLTKwEEN�VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PL�4N�ffNG GAP ._ _J , Co `Mo1 No. EpFile No. Fee S100.00 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Gateway Corporate Center 2. Name of applicant: Kaiser Gateway Associates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Joe Layman, Bedford Properties, 12886 Interurban Ave. S., Seattle, Washington 98168. 248 -7318 4. Date checklist prepared: August 21, 1987 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase III anticipated in late 1987. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None, other than site development of vacant lots. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Previously prepared short subdivision, geotechnical studies, surveys, improvement plans. Approval for Phase III on lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 is currently in for city approval for shoreline permit. 9.. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila permits Shoreline permit for Phase III construction Shoreline permit for this subdivision 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi . checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. This proposal is for resubdivision of an existing approved industrial property. Objective is to accommodate existing and proposed buildings on individual lots as well as provide for dedication of Gateway Drive. Proiect site equals 36.4 acres. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and_section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica -. tions related to this checklist. • Site is located along Interurban Avenue S. at approximately 133rd. See attached plat map and legal description for additional information. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Possibly_only the river frontage. -3- . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1 - 2% other than river bank. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silt and sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minimal fill for additional new buildings. access drives and parking. Quantities are not known -t this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Due to setbacks from river bank and flat site slopes, erosion should be minimal to none. Approved erosion control devices will be utilized during f„t„rP site development. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 80% Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Development will conform to city requirements for erosion control. Potential increase can be mitigated by proper construction techniques such as temporary . siltation ponds, silt fences, diversion swales and hydroseeding. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Vehicular emissions normally associated with industrial parks. Emissions from site construction would include dust and equipment exhaust. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: _ Any industry that locates here would have to meet emission standards. Provide proper equipment maintenance to control exhaust emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Duwamish River • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The subdivision will not require work within 200 feet other than placement of lot corners for final plat. Future site development will occur within 200 feet. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None anticipated. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, site adjacent to Duwamish River. Location is shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps for City of Tukwila, Community Panel No. 530091 -001B. No development proposed within 100 year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Proposed subdivision will not change currently approved means of handling storm water, which is to discharge it into the Duwamish River. liO Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Properly designed, constructed and maintained drainage facilities will minimize impacts as well as utilization of erosion control measures. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass and shrubs with eventual site development of remaining vacant land. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Future site development along river utilize.some native species and existing trees along river will be retained to the extent possible. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Possible songbirds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Possible Salmon in river b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only i 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas, primarily for lighting, heating and some manufacturing. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation and orientation of future buildings. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None anticipated. Future tenants must meet city, count/ and state regulations for hazardous materials. Specific future tenants are not known at this time. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Future construction during normal work day hours over short term. Incremental increase in traffic noise over long term. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Approximately two years ago was pasture land. c. Describe any structures on the site. Site has recently constructed high quality industrial buildings. Evaluation for Agency Use Only dik Evaluation for IMF Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the Site? Light Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, shorelines area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not available j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: _ Proposed future development will be compatible with recently constructed improvements. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Does not apply b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable to subdivision action. Future site development will be subject to further revie3 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable to subdivision action. . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Future site development to utilize cut off light fixtures. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Future trail along Duwamish River. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Making provisions for future shoreline trail. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation, a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Avenue S. - See Plat Map. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Do not know. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Quantity of new spaces to conform to required amount for use. None will be eliminated • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - roadway already constructed for approvals underway. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 2,000 - 3,000. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: As condition of previous approvals applicant making improvements to Interurban Avenue S. and installation of signal at 133rd. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None, other than that associated with business park. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities efectr1c1t elep • tly available a Ovate septic ys em, o er. •Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Power (Puget Power & Light Company jl0ity) Gas (Washington Natural Gas) Sewer (City) Telephone (Pacific Northwest Bell) C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 601/, Signature: Date Submitted: //$1/6 ' 7 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. Now would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect, environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Meet site elanning requirements for M -1 uses. The objective is to create individual lots around existing building envelopes and future building sites. This will allow the applicant the ability to sell existing buildings and future building sites to individual owners. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There is no viable alternative means under current city and state subdivision laws to achieve the objec- tives of this proposal. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: A condominium is possible. However, this mechanism would create unnecessary difficulties in the mainte- nance and management of common areas. The end result of this approach would not result in mitigating significantly environmental imparts_ A subdivision of the parcel is preferred. 1 • 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 7 / n r da -VICINITY MAP NIS DESCRIPTION 4' 011 jnot ee re ln n el propeery situ4+ee • in 4he C.:4N '+. of Tu1sw 1e'. 6....4../...of re ....g, Strife of - Woehinyton, •• Ue n3!. that perkieri of the' C.C. Lewis Donation Ln.d'. • G1a No,' 67;4".41 Seet.Pne,•.(0 4 15,''Township. 25 Ner1h; :Range 4'`ic.d W ML; ad' being ore porNeularly daxr•ted - as fa00w5 4.•- L0te 1, 2. 9 414 ts4 4tle : 9.eri, Subdivis on 8oteay Corporate Center; (85 -52 -89)x. recorded -.near A.F. A 21811170585, and ',...in Boor 52 of 9urVe.ls 04.,Veye 113, under A.F. '0 88 1117 9001 1-1--- -- --- I-.- `\ 3:35 ACRES l ' i O ,..,...r- \ . -� - -- 250'- --Dr R. -f 2. 4/� - _ GATEWAY "250' - ?o- " LEGEND: Exlslmg 0 - -- 69 - -- 54orr•' Oroin Ceteh Sabin. Manhde Sanitary Seer .:. Water Line .. .. :Water Vo0e' Faire MVdrant. -' ?ewer Pole Liyht Pete NOTES. Owner /Developer ((4045 .GAT5W 4550032055 (2886 INTE2U294N AV2.. Engineer /Surveyor.'' W LSEY -4 -11AM ".'580-1124. 4V4. (45 Beu -sv3E, WA 55004 Properly: 1-°c°6317 CITY OF TU(WILA 10146 C0UNTY, WA5NIN&T0N - Zoning'' �••I -_1 . • 3i•e rind oe3o.n,n5 Praperhee e.. south sale of the Ouwo..lsh . .. Elver are In, City ef- •T.Kwlw.Lenin" 01etruse 84-1. .W'aperhee ann.. nor., fide .4 -0 Duwasonn diner: wi4•.in City of Tet.wlla Ll..:4s • ore as no - (2-1-72 4.2.4); wl4hin Unlncorporetad • 10..3 Counfy • L.49 4.5 40 and 7.8.9 4 10 ere s.,b;err'fe :joint::porene and eircuht:en o3ree,9er.fa: . A e:gn oe easement is .,e be piwlded on Let 40 -. no bene44 .lets -7, 5 15 The 000,ear F1oed EteVOhon of .15.2 Is In tone A.1, per Ftood I,.5 tunes Rote Mop for 'the - Ci4V of Tue.wda, K■g Count7i'WA, Cornmuninf Pone1 Ne.- 580051 001: 0. Area Ca:culotlons' 11 . 176,351 ' d.05 .' 203,410.•' 4.07 3, . 121,379 - : 279. �_ 4j teepee - . 2.49 51 :119335 -: • 274 6. 114,541 " 2.63 7i .141,094:.. 3.24 8 .137,175 115 9 137764' .3.10 -, - 10 157,451, -. 5.01 11 .32712 .0-75. 1,048 , 002 Edey 155)55 5.10 707755 1,585460 53.40 • 2) 8 48'13'44'V 1170.27 PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY (SEATTLE CITYLIGHT) RO.W. INTERURBAN AVENUE Yeee . eaaeoone i r=,tirr�VIP.n 19871: 0 /1'13zlr Arose 4,1837 . •, Scale :1--100- 'Designed 0,13 p� Coleeee/1es Checked FPC/YAC Approved Dwg. Number \ 3 -280- 1001- 10-DI' zoo SHEET 28010 402 28- Jul - 87,15.43 •• / 280.10 - 10110 . "'