The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-321-86 - DIAZ GYMNASTICS - COOPERATIVE PARKING AGREEMENTDIAZ GYMNASTICS COOPERATIVE PARKING 1106 ANDOVER PARK W. EPIC 321 -86 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Diaz Gymnastics Cooperative Parking Agreement Proponent Diaz Gymnastics Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 1106 Andover Park West Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 32-1-86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. .fix[ There is no comment period for this DNS (J This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date May 14, 1986 Signature ? ' - - Y o u may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS -"A grie / // CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: •CN 86 -140 EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreemen. TO: Ei BLDG 0 PLNG n P.W. FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- , MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CI 01 COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT e/t (/ ran fr / a5wce 5 duk-11_, & /di , p /,n 1<e Vieo p rDG.es5 DATE By MAY 61986 TUKWILAf_JF /,',Y'-�,VE(J QN ---- -- t/ /ae4T( /.21 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: EJ BLDG 0 PLNG Q P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics •CN 86 -140 EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreement LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT \0 kIrtsA 14-00 0 DATE .S1'i( 6 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN 86 -140 EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreement TO: 0 BLDG Q PLNG 0 P.W. n FIRE El POLICE (VII& R PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 6 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: .CN 86 -140 EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreemen TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG 0 P.W. PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics 1 1 OL I CE 0 P R Pcct L LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT B2C....ONLY DEPARTMENT CONCERN WOULD BE THOSE PARENTS OF YOUNGER CHILDREN WHO DRIVE TO FACILITY AND THAN PARK AND WAIT. LIABLE TO CAUSE AN OVERFLOW OR SOME ILLEGAL STREET PARKING. 5/5/86 pj11� DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 skti CITY OF TUKWILA 411CN 86 -140 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreement TO: 0 BLDG EaptNG (] P.W. n FIRE J POLICE n P & R PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT w fr M / w ..- / '9 o 1P00 /1 /1,2 4i6,4,6te DATE r ,1 ; - COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: �CN 86 -140 EPIC - 321 -86 FILE 86 -17 -SPE Diaz Gymnastic School - Cooperative Parking Agreement TO:LDG ; n PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT Diaz School of Gymnastics LOCATION 1106 Andover Park West FILE NO. 86 -17 -SPE DATE TRANSMITTED 5/2/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR Moira Bradshaw via K. Stetson RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT qq0 uPflorOrvir.acta ("tn,evirt,e0) potyg) (sia.0 vitti/c1/4 607/AtLiCal t.)42 11/1-1 04k;A2b&E.4031. DATE 1 —��Q COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 111111% .. OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM INFORMA410 TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM PROJECT Diaz - Cooperative Parking Control # 86 -140 Irmit /File # 86- 17 -SPE ADDRESS 1106 Andover Park West STAFF REVIEWER Moira Bradshaw BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE TRANSMITTED TO THE APPLICANT /DEVELOPER. (14/111, ✓ L mOG+L/f , adir 7 , Cc,a tit.h , .P , • a . Q-li OI Uu-P -gb ,L. J-kv £u»dig/1 Jvi oi-' • 419 NAy £ `e Lft C) ylat ui . 0 O � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer 0 I contacted applicant /developer (name) on (date) 0 Please follow -up with me on my concerns by (date) CPS FOLLOW -UP (i Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on (date) Distributed copy of letter to file #s: Comments Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence .to.staff . person and appropriate files. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. • ContriNo. Epic File No. Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Diaz Gymnastics N/A 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: John Diaz 1027 Andover Park Past. Tiikw; 1 a, WA 4. Date checklist prepared: April 91, 1QRh 5. Agency requesting Checklist: _ City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): N/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. or.ora 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that as you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Di a7 GymnaRti rc Je7i chat to nrrury 1 n, 5(10 adnar& feet in a 1 12, 000 srhtarP _oar mul — -! -1 -89 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. • 1,106 Anndver Park West. Exhibit A and Exhibit R enclosed 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No TO BE COMPLETED.BY APPLICS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth iEvaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. N/A d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N/A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. This would not be a trucking facility only emission would be from automobiles b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Most of the students are under the au of c ixteen and will rirdP the bt'S to this 'oration_ 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ,__No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Sanitary GPwer only_ c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. _atom water into storm drain Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Nn d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Nnne 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X- shrubs _ grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x, other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? gone c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: NnnP mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Nope b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nnnp c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only ilO Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Gas space hear b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Rark dnnr exit 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None • b. Noise . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Andover Park West 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the. site. No noise 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial builslinp,.s_ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Concrete building. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? cm f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 15 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? NI.a. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nomp c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views ?_ N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Nth 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? The proposQ* b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N /A_ 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing st,eet system. Show on site plans, if any. Andover ParkJ est b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YPs c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Currently 14R parking stalls_ • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1n trips a gay, hntirg of op Ling 2:00 p.m_ 1701 Tenn p m Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Nn b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. jAt_ • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. gas, water, telephone, sanitary sewer • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A C. Signature The above answers area rue and complete the best of my knowledge. I un erstand that y the ad /sency is relying on them to mi, e its decisi Signature: Date Submitted: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• (U0 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms: 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural recourses are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan?__ /A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: TO BE COMPLETED'BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proposed is wishing to occupy space at 1106 Andover Portliest 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? At this time there are none due to their specific requirement. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: £.1 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Not to nnr knowledge Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: WP feel there are no ronflictg -23- • 1 • -.—' Street McTessc hx4ner rit ue +t 11./cv11n. W► 4811$ ...A' n' - _ .. ill••. — ?1l _. - • • • EXHIBIT B LINCOLN CENTER SOUTH ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA - WASHINGTON That portion of Government Lot 1 f Section 35 and the South- east 4 of the Southeast k of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, described as follows: 13cginning at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1 of Section 35; thence North 87 °44'08" Wcst along the Nortli line of :.aid Government Lot 1, a distance of 949.49 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 01 °S1'39" West a distance of 107.44 feet; thence North 88 °08'21" West a distance of 333.00 feet to the East margin of Andover Park Wcst; thence North U1 °S1'39" East along said East margin of Andover Park West a distanco of 109.79 feet; thence Nortli 01°47'29" East along said East margin of Andover Park West a distnacc of 634.01 feet to the North line of Soutiicenter Industrial Park; thence South 88 °12'31" East along said North line of Soutlicenter Industrial Park a distance of 34(1.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 70 °57'17" East, Having a radius; of 300.00 feet, an arc distance of 90.34 feet; through a central angle of 17 °15'14 "; thence South 01 °47'29" West a'distance of 547.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. CITY OF TUKWILA - Planning Department APPLICATION TIMETABLE CHECKLIST Project Diaz Gymnastics - Cooperative Parking File #(s) 86- 17 -SPE Location 1106 Andover Park West SEPA # EPIC - 321 -86 Pre - application meeting date 5/5/86 Control # 86 -140 Pre -app. # Date application received 5/2/86 Fees $ 100.00 Kroll page 344E Qtr- Sec- Twp -Rng SE 26 -23 -4 Receipt # 1127A Tax Lot # GENERAL INFORMATION Request A cooperative parking agreement for a gymnastic school Description of project APPLICATION INFORMATION Contact Person George Rockwell Phone 251 -0770 Address 2120 SW 43rd Renton, WA Zip 98055 Property Owner Howard Wong Phone (604) 685 -8264 Address 227 East Georgia Street Vancouver, BC Zip V6A 1Z6 Contract Purchaser Phone Address Zip PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS /DEADLINES Notice publication deadline 5/9/86 Date published 5/11/86 Notice to property owners deadline 5/9/86 Date mailed 5/9/86 Notice posted on property deadline 5/9/86 Date posted 5/9/86 Notice of Shoreline app. deadline 1st notice published 30 day comment period ends 2nd notice published ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Comment period: Yes X No 15 day deadline from action Date routed 5/2/86 Due back 5/9/86 All comments received Additional information required Date submitted Date routed Due back All comments received DNS issued Mitigated DNS issued EIS required Date N ARKADJU NT /PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting date(s) 5/22/86 Date of final action Approved Approved with conditions Denied Conditions Appeal deadline June 2, 1986 Appealed: Yes No Shoreline Permit sent to DOE Date-DOE received 30 day appeal period ends CITY COUNCIL Hearing date assigned Results of Hearing Ordinance or Resolution assigned Effective date LAND USE MAP UPDATED ZONING MAP UPDATED (23 /ATC)